<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Losing the Next War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=losing-the-next-war</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghostwriter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4439319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghostwriter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4439319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe both you and Jerome should grow a brain or read a book instead of parroting anti-semitic swill. 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe both you and Jerome should grow a brain or read a book instead of parroting anti-semitic swill. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghostwriter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4439310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghostwriter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4439310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What &quot;empire,&quot;EarlyBirdbrain? We don&#039;t HAVE an empire! Your history is as bad as your Jew hatred. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What &quot;empire,&quot;EarlyBirdbrain? We don&#039;t HAVE an empire! Your history is as bad as your Jew hatred. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking4Sanity</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4438506</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Looking4Sanity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 01:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4438506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No kidding, tardling? Then why did you want to jump right past it to a firing squad? Insulting me is not going to distract from the fact that you wanted to execute the man without the benefit of a trial. Additionally, and also contrary to your asinine opinion, even if he were found guilty, death is NOT the only punishment available to the presiding officers of a courts martial. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No kidding, tardling? Then why did you want to jump right past it to a firing squad? Insulting me is not going to distract from the fact that you wanted to execute the man without the benefit of a trial. Additionally, and also contrary to your asinine opinion, even if he were found guilty, death is NOT the only punishment available to the presiding officers of a courts martial. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4437942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4437942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A court martial IS a &quot;trial,&quot; you drooling idiot.   
 
Now shoo, bug! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A court martial IS a &quot;trial,&quot; you drooling idiot.   </p>
<p>Now shoo, bug! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking4Sanity</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4437834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Looking4Sanity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 20:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4437834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You conveniently left out the trial part in your original comment. You&#039;re only backpedaling now to hide your Statist proclivities. FAIL. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You conveniently left out the trial part in your original comment. You&#039;re only backpedaling now to hide your Statist proclivities. FAIL. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4437658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 18:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4437658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, I&#039;ll humor you:  what exactly does the Uniform Code of Military Justice require and allow in regard to a American soldier in uniform who kills fellow soldiers?  Huh smarty pants?   
 
I&#039;ll help:  a court martial, after which if found guilty, execution.   
 
You&#039;re welcome.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#039;ll humor you:  what exactly does the Uniform Code of Military Justice require and allow in regard to a American soldier in uniform who kills fellow soldiers?  Huh smarty pants?   </p>
<p>I&#039;ll help:  a court martial, after which if found guilty, execution.   </p>
<p>You&#039;re welcome.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking4Sanity</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4437496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Looking4Sanity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4437496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I expect that kind of response from a tardling. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect that kind of response from a tardling. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Looking4Sanity</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4437493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Looking4Sanity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 17:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4437493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You obviously have no knowledge of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Ignorant people should have the good sense to keep their mouths shut until they&#039;ve educated themselves instead of spouting emotional nonsense as you are. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You obviously have no knowledge of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Ignorant people should have the good sense to keep their mouths shut until they&#039;ve educated themselves instead of spouting emotional nonsense as you are. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4437253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4437253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, he should be executed by firing squad, not put in Gitmo.  He committed an act of high treason while serving as an active member of the US military.  He falls into a different category as an armed combatant (or as so many in Gitmo are, simply &quot;suspected&quot; combatants).   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, he should be executed by firing squad, not put in Gitmo.  He committed an act of high treason while serving as an active member of the US military.  He falls into a different category as an armed combatant (or as so many in Gitmo are, simply &quot;suspected&quot; combatants).   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4437249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4437249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course, Drakken. And this guy should be executed for his crimes, like yesterday.  (Why does it always take so long to off these guys?)   
 
My point is that he should be executed for commiting an act of treason, not because he is a Muslim.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, Drakken. And this guy should be executed for his crimes, like yesterday.  (Why does it always take so long to off these guys?)   </p>
<p>My point is that he should be executed for commiting an act of treason, not because he is a Muslim.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4437246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4437246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nobody is guaranteeing anything.  We could be in a massive armed conflict with China tomorrow for all anyone genuinely &quot;knows.&quot;   
 
The Joint Chiefs are assessing the most likely future threats, and since they understand we live in a world where money is not limitless, are suggesting where to put those limited funds and structure our military to best address those most likely threats.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody is guaranteeing anything.  We could be in a massive armed conflict with China tomorrow for all anyone genuinely &quot;knows.&quot;   </p>
<p>The Joint Chiefs are assessing the most likely future threats, and since they understand we live in a world where money is not limitless, are suggesting where to put those limited funds and structure our military to best address those most likely threats.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4437235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4437235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But this question must be asked:  &quot;Why does the US need to take total responsibility for every hot spot in the world to begin with?&quot;  Once we determine our genuine interests vs. our desires, are, we might realize that we don&#039;t have to &quot;do something&quot; about say, Syria, anymore than any other country needs to.  Force regional players to be responsible for once, and do what they need to do to contain the problems in their backyard.   
 
We spend the same amount as the next 8 biggest militaries combined.  We can easily afford to scale back the big expensive hardware (ships, planes, tanks, submarines), while dealing with actual threats.   
 
There are limitless things to be &quot;scared&quot; of.  We simply can not afford to be prepared to get into wars everywhere all the time.  The issue is simply becoming moot, and this problem has been happening for decades, well before Obama came on the picture.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But this question must be asked:  &quot;Why does the US need to take total responsibility for every hot spot in the world to begin with?&quot;  Once we determine our genuine interests vs. our desires, are, we might realize that we don&#039;t have to &quot;do something&quot; about say, Syria, anymore than any other country needs to.  Force regional players to be responsible for once, and do what they need to do to contain the problems in their backyard.   </p>
<p>We spend the same amount as the next 8 biggest militaries combined.  We can easily afford to scale back the big expensive hardware (ships, planes, tanks, submarines), while dealing with actual threats.   </p>
<p>There are limitless things to be &quot;scared&quot; of.  We simply can not afford to be prepared to get into wars everywhere all the time.  The issue is simply becoming moot, and this problem has been happening for decades, well before Obama came on the picture.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4437207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4437207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dude, you&#039;re just strange.  You don&#039;t seem to make any sense.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, you&#039;re just strange.  You don&#039;t seem to make any sense.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4437205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 16:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4437205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Flowerknife, I&#039;m not sure how old you are, but here are some questions for you: 
 
Why would we need or want to maintain a navy as big as that in WWII, which was designed to fight a massive global conflict? 
 
Why would we need or want to maintain a navy as big as that during the Cold War, where we were staring down communists in every part of the globe?   
 
Why is it a bad thing to adjust the size and cost of our military to the actual threats that exist in the world, like our very own generals suggest we do given the enormous cost of keeping such a massive military?   
 
Why can&#039;t we recognize too, that the amazing technology we bring to bear means we don&#039;t need as &quot;big&quot; a military in terms of the numbers of ships, tanks, planes, soldiers, etc.?   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flowerknife, I&#039;m not sure how old you are, but here are some questions for you: </p>
<p>Why would we need or want to maintain a navy as big as that in WWII, which was designed to fight a massive global conflict? </p>
<p>Why would we need or want to maintain a navy as big as that during the Cold War, where we were staring down communists in every part of the globe?   </p>
<p>Why is it a bad thing to adjust the size and cost of our military to the actual threats that exist in the world, like our very own generals suggest we do given the enormous cost of keeping such a massive military?   </p>
<p>Why can&#039;t we recognize too, that the amazing technology we bring to bear means we don&#039;t need as &quot;big&quot; a military in terms of the numbers of ships, tanks, planes, soldiers, etc.?   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4437172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4437172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing I am stating precludes us from taking out threats as needed.   
 
If you can&#039;t see the difference between knocking off Barbary pirates (or gaggles of Alquies, assorted terrorists, crazed Islamist groups, warlords, etc.) and coming home, vs. the cost to the US of permanently occupying 130+ military bases around the world as we have for decades, you don&#039;t get it at all.   
 
Fiscal health is part of national security.  Even money spent on wars and weapons counts as much as money spent on ....shudder...education, healthcare, streets, bridges, police, judges, firefighters, etc.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing I am stating precludes us from taking out threats as needed.   </p>
<p>If you can&#039;t see the difference between knocking off Barbary pirates (or gaggles of Alquies, assorted terrorists, crazed Islamist groups, warlords, etc.) and coming home, vs. the cost to the US of permanently occupying 130+ military bases around the world as we have for decades, you don&#039;t get it at all.   </p>
<p>Fiscal health is part of national security.  Even money spent on wars and weapons counts as much as money spent on &#8230;.shudder&#8230;education, healthcare, streets, bridges, police, judges, firefighters, etc.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4437159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4437159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drakken, we need to scale down our spending everywhere, including Defense.  Even your fellow four star generals in the Joint Chiefs of Staff agree with this. 
 
A nation must plan for the types of wars it expects to fight, and you generals agree we should not expect massive armies clashing on the steppes of Eastern Europe, which so much of the wildly expensive weapons systems we continue to build are designed for.  We do that to keep communities who build those weapons systems employed, not to defend ourselves from real threats.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drakken, we need to scale down our spending everywhere, including Defense.  Even your fellow four star generals in the Joint Chiefs of Staff agree with this. </p>
<p>A nation must plan for the types of wars it expects to fight, and you generals agree we should not expect massive armies clashing on the steppes of Eastern Europe, which so much of the wildly expensive weapons systems we continue to build are designed for.  We do that to keep communities who build those weapons systems employed, not to defend ourselves from real threats.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4437117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4437117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;How is it that we could afford a 600 ship Navy under Bush, but not under Obama?&quot; 
 
We couldn&#039;t afford that 600 ship navy, or the empire that it serves.   
 
&quot;The greatest threat to America&#039;s fiscal solvency is the criminal, runaway spending,...&quot; 
 
Exactly.  And that includes unnecessary Defense spending. Three main expenditures drive our debt: Defense, Social Security and Medicare.  All three must be addressed to get our debt down.    
 
&quot;and mindless printing of paper money...&quot; 
 
That too!   
 
&quot;Sorry, defending ourselves isn&#039;t a threat to anyone; and if we can&#039;t defend ourselves, we don&#039;t have a country.&quot; 
 
We do not need numerous carrier battle groups, armor and airplanes intended to fight a Cold War style conflict to defend ourselves or our interests, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff say it themselves.  All that hardware is wasted money to keep politicians&#039; constituents employed, not to defend ourselves.  We. Can. Not. Afford. It.  Part of national security is fiscal security.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;How is it that we could afford a 600 ship Navy under Bush, but not under Obama?&quot; </p>
<p>We couldn&#039;t afford that 600 ship navy, or the empire that it serves.   </p>
<p>&quot;The greatest threat to America&#039;s fiscal solvency is the criminal, runaway spending,&#8230;&quot; </p>
<p>Exactly.  And that includes unnecessary Defense spending. Three main expenditures drive our debt: Defense, Social Security and Medicare.  All three must be addressed to get our debt down.    </p>
<p>&quot;and mindless printing of paper money&#8230;&quot; </p>
<p>That too!   </p>
<p>&quot;Sorry, defending ourselves isn&#039;t a threat to anyone; and if we can&#039;t defend ourselves, we don&#039;t have a country.&quot; </p>
<p>We do not need numerous carrier battle groups, armor and airplanes intended to fight a Cold War style conflict to defend ourselves or our interests, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff say it themselves.  All that hardware is wasted money to keep politicians&#039; constituents employed, not to defend ourselves.  We. Can. Not. Afford. It.  Part of national security is fiscal security.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flowerknife_us</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4436568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flowerknife_us]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 11:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4436568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Navy has shrunk in Half as I grew up It is our principle source of conventional defense of the Country as well as securing the shipping lanes of a Country heavily dependent on Imports. 
 
Your &quot;facts&quot; leave a wanting of relevance. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Navy has shrunk in Half as I grew up It is our principle source of conventional defense of the Country as well as securing the shipping lanes of a Country heavily dependent on Imports. </p>
<p>Your &quot;facts&quot; leave a wanting of relevance. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snorbak</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4435128</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snorbak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4435128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Fact: for 20+ years the US military&#039;s own analyses has been stating that low-intensity wars fought against insurgencies, such as those found in Iraq and Afghanistan, will be the rule, making the massive standing army and Cold War hardware Walsh prefers completely pointless.&quot; 
 
The only &quot;fact&quot; here is that some within the US military falsely believe the above thinking to be true. Don&#039;t be so naive as to believe that some analysts perception will turn out to be reality. Assuming that the only wars to be fought in the future will be &quot;low intensity?&quot; COIN operations &amp; structuring your military for same shows a lack of insight &amp; leaves your military vulnerable. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Fact: for 20+ years the US military&#039;s own analyses has been stating that low-intensity wars fought against insurgencies, such as those found in Iraq and Afghanistan, will be the rule, making the massive standing army and Cold War hardware Walsh prefers completely pointless.&quot; </p>
<p>The only &quot;fact&quot; here is that some within the US military falsely believe the above thinking to be true. Don&#039;t be so naive as to believe that some analysts perception will turn out to be reality. Assuming that the only wars to be fought in the future will be &quot;low intensity?&quot; COIN operations &amp; structuring your military for same shows a lack of insight &amp; leaves your military vulnerable. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-walsh/losing-the-next-war/comment-page-1/#comment-4435062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Marshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 01:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183688#comment-4435062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those who read THE ROOTS of OBAMA&#039;S RAGE know why he wanted to weaken our military capabilities and destroy capitalism. These same plans were mentioned in his book, Audacity of Hope. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who read THE ROOTS of OBAMA&#039;S RAGE know why he wanted to weaken our military capabilities and destroy capitalism. These same plans were mentioned in his book, Audacity of Hope. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 732/813 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 15:10:02 by W3 Total Cache -->