Geneva Conference Moves Toward Criminalizing “Islamophobia”


oic_summit_cairo_02_06_2013In its quest to criminalize speech that’s critical of all Islam-related topics, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC)* endorsed the formation of a new Advisory Media Committee to address “Islamophobia.”

This past September, the OIC held “The First International Conference on Islamophobia: Law & Media.”  The conference endorsed numerous recommendations which arose from prior workshops on Islamophobia from media, legal and political perspectives.  A main conclusion was the consensus to institutionalize the conference and create an Advisory Media Committee to meet under the newly established OIC Media Forum based in Istanbul Turkey.

Supposedly, the purpose of the conference was to support an OIC campaign to “correct the image of Islam and Muslims in Europe and North America.”  By this, it means to whitewash the intolerant, violent and discriminatory aspects of Islam and Islamists.  The OIC has launched a campaign to provide disinformation to the public, delinking all Islam from these undesirable traits and attacks all who insist on these truths, as bigots, racists and Islamophobes.

The OIC is a 57 member organization consisting of Muslim countries whose long term goal is the worldwide implementation of Sharia law and seemingly the ultimate establishment of a Caliphate.  Its members tend to vote together as a block in the UN, so it is extremely powerful, despite the fact that few people have heard of it.

Its present goal is the international criminalization of all speech that “defames” Islam, which the OIC defines as anything that sheds a negative light on Islam or Muslims, even when it’s true.

Its target is the West and one of its tactics is to accuse those who criticize Islam or its various interpretations as “Islamophobic.”  It is attempting to pass the equivalent of Islamic blasphemy codes in the West, using accusations of bigotry to silence anyone who speaks the truth about Islamic terrorism or Islamic persecution of religious minorities.

The OIC uses international bodies such as the UN and international “consensus building” as a platform to achieve its goals.  Certainly, if the OIC straightforwardly informed America and Europe of its aspirations to silence speech, it would gain no strides.  Therefore, it uses bureaucratic, unaccountable entities such as the UN as a means to make inroads, using watered down language and words that sound palatable to the West in order to deceive the public about its underlying goals.

Unfortunately, the OIC has been fairly successful in passing UN resolutions that if implemented, would have the effect of stifling speech that “defames religions.”  Of course, the OIC is only concerned with the defamation of Islam.  Indeed, OIC countries all have some sort of Islamic blasphemy laws which prohibit such defamation.  To be certain, these laws are regularly used to criminally punish those who speak critically of Islam.  These laws are also used to justify persecution of religious minorities.  For example, in many OIC countries, openly practicing a version of Islam not sanctioned by the government can land one in jail for blasphemy.  The OIC has no reciprocity in refraining from “defamation” of Judaism, Christianity, or other religions.

After the US realized that the UN resolution to Combat Defamation of Religions had a potentially disastrous impact on free expression, the US State Department asked the OIC to draft an alternative resolution that would address “Islamophobia” concerns and still retain free speech.  The OIC produced Resolution 16/18 to Combat Intolerance Based on Religion or Belief. Initially, the State Department interpreted this resolution to protect religious minorities of all stripes from discrimination and violence, while still retaining freedom of speech.

The OIC, however, has made it clear that it clings to its goal to protect Islam from so-called defamation.  Indeed, it has manipulated the language in resolution to do just that.

Rizwan Saeed Sheikh, spokesman for the OIC Secretary General has explained that the OIC’s goal is to make “denigration of religions” a crime. Somehow, over time, the State Department appears to have adopted the OIC’s view that the West is Islamophobic and that Islam is a religion of peace which should never be associated with terrorism.  Toward this end, the Obama Administration has completely purged all its counterterrorism training programs from any mention of Islamic terrorism.  Only “right-wing extremists” persist in using the term, and of course are “Islamophobes” for doing so.

The OIC’s claims that it seeks to protect all religions and religious symbols from defamation are patently false and are contrary to the actions of the OIC countries which discriminate against infidels.  In Saudi Arabia, Jews are denied citizenship; in Iran, Baha’is are denied equal employment opportunities; in Pakistan, Ahmadiyya Muslims are jailed for openly practicing their faith, and there’s a genocide against Coptic Christians in Egypt.  Many OIC countries also prohibit the building or repair of churches and synagogues as well as public worship by minority religions.

The September meeting constituted the third Istanbul Conference:  international meetings designed to implement Resolution 16/18 in support of the OIC’s agenda to combat “Islamophobia” in the West.

If the OIC really wanted to combat Islamophobia, it would persuade terrorists to refrain from violence; it would condemn the genocide of Coptic Christians in Egypt and it would spare little girls from forced marriages in OIC countries. The OIC has the power to stop the denigration of Jewish, Christian, Zorastrian and Baha’i religious symbols in the OIC countries.  It can pressure OIC member states to implement domestic policies that will honor and respect minority religions in the Middle East and elsewhere.  Do this, and “Islamophobia” in the West will dissipate.

Instead, the OIC requests that the media censor their reports about Islamic terrorism, Islamic persecution of religious minorities and human rights violations committed in the name of Islam, as an interim step toward the criminalization of such speech.  All of this will only serve to increase, not decrease “Islamophobia.”

The clash of civilizations widens.

*The Organization of Islamic Cooperation was originally called The Organization of Islamic Conference, but changed its name in 2011.

This article was commissioned by The Legal Project, an activity of the Middle East Forum.

*

Don’t miss Jamie Glazov’s video interview with Walid Shoeba about The Case for Islamophobia:

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • American1969

    Islam is not a religion. It is a culture, and it is incompatible with Western civilization.

    • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ Jason P

      No matter what it is, we in the West hold that nothing–absolutely nothing–is exempt from critical examination.

      “Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call to her tribunal every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blindfolded fear.” Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, 1787

      Exempting Islam from criticism is an attack on the West. We must fight this with every fiber of our soul.

    • DownTurn

      > Islam is not a religion.

      There is no strict definition of religion. Everything that calls itself a religion is a religion, Scientology being the best example.

      We have to admit that not all religions are equal and that some religions are better than others and that some religions like Islam are inherently evil.

      • defcon 4

        Ever since I learned about islam my respect for Scientology has increased .

      • ObamaYoMoma

        There is no strict definition of religion. Everything that calls itself a religion is a religion, Scientology being the best example

        Totally 100 percent wrong. Religion is usually defined as being a faith. You can choose to believe or not to believe. It’s up to each individual. In other words, religion, i.e., faith, presupposes the freedom of conscience.

        In Islam, on the other hand, the first and foremost prerequisite is the total, complete, and unconditional submission to the “will of Allah” under the penalty of death for blasphemy and apostasy. Thus, a person of Islamic persuasion is either a Muslim or otherwise a blasphemous apostate, and if the latter the texts and tenets of Islam are very clear, in that they must be executed.

        In other words, the freedom of conscience in Islam is strictly controlled via the penalty of death for blasphemy and apostasy. Thus, there is no freedom of conscience, and that makes Islam by definition a very totalitarian cult. Indeed, once a Muslim, always a Muslim, as the only other alternative, i.e., non-belief, is suicide.

        Of course, all Muslims believe ignorantly that Islam is a religion and the best religion of all, but that’s because like you they don’t really understand what a religion is, especially since Islam is not a religion.

        Furthermore, what is the “will of Allah” that all Muslims must totally, completely, and unconditionally submit to under the penalty of death for blasphemy and apostasy? In essence it is Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law.

        Moreover, jihad (holy war) is the highest pillar of Islam. Fighting it is also a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims, including women and children, in one form or another. Thus, all Muslims are jihadists in one form or another. Otherwise, they are blasphemous apostates that per the texts and tenets of Islam must be executed.

        Indeed, the sole fundamental purpose of Islam is the subjugation into Islamic totalitarianism of all religions and all infidels through both violent and non-violent jihad and the eventual imposition of Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law, in order to make Islam supreme throughout the world.

        As a matter of fact, it is only Islam that makes the very dubious claim that it’s holy book (the Koran) contains the direct verbatim testimony of Allah (God) as dictated to Muhammad by the archangel Gabriel. Thus, according to Muslims, this makes Islam supreme above all religions in the world since the Koran in essence is the infallible word of Allah (God). The sad part of this stupidity is Islam is not even a Faith, but instead a very totalitarian cult that very strictly controls the freedom of conscience under the penalty of death for blasphemy and apostasy. Meanwhile all Faiths, on the other hand and in stark contrast to Islam, presuppose the freedom of conscience whereby each individual can choose to believe or not to believe.

        Indeed, does Scientology condemn all former believers and all those that speak out against Scientology to death the same way that Islam does. Hardly!

    • kikorikid

      YES!, A culture that is guided by a totalitarian-supremacist ideology.
      The claim of “RELIGION” is obfuscation.

  • Hass

    If this preposterous criminalization of all speech against Islam gets passed through, I’m hoping everyone defies it on mass. I know I will.

    • Johnnie the Jew

      Here we go again. A retarded death cult described as a religion and afforded all the privileges of all other religions that don’t prescribe death for apostasy.And that’s just for starters. And of course that clown Erdogan is spearheading this crap. Ataturk must be convulsing in his grave listening to this wretched, cancer ridden windbag, who sidles up behind that dhimmi in the White House in his demands for an international blasphemy law. If I had a tenner for everytime Obama qualifies his references to Idiotlam as a “great religion” I could finance a trip to Burma to worship with some enlightened Buddhists. Peace.

  • southwood

    I don’t like the tone of this article. There is a virtual genocide of Christians in Muslim countries yet this article downplays this very important fact. It refers to the Jews’ position in Saudi Arabia yet Christianity which is a far larger and more significant world religion has almost no legitimacy in Saudi Arabia. Not one place of worship has been built for Christians there. Obviously the writer is a Jew so that will be less important to her.

    • defcon 4

      I don’t think Jews are even allowed in Soddy Barbaria — at all. How does that grab ya?

      • southwood

        Officially they are allowed in. But here’s the thing: the good old USA aids and abets its great”ally” in Saudi Arabia. In actual fact it is aiding and abetting a state which probably equips terrorists with US supplied weapons, and most of the 9/11 hijackers/murderers were Saudi if I am not mistaken. How does that grab YOU ?

        The United States has long been Saudi Arabia’s leading arms supplier.
        From 1950 through 2006,
        Saudi Arabia bought or was granted from the United States weapons,
        military equipment and
        services worth $79.8 billion. Almost a fifth of all American arms sales
        during that period went to Saudi Arabia—or 19% of all U.S. arms sales
        during the period. The proportion underscores the importance of Saudi
        Arabia to the American defense industry

        • defcon 4

          Liar. “Officially they are allowed in”. Really? Tell that to Delta airlines, which announced they would enforce the ban on Jews traveling to the holey kingdom of Soddy Barbaria:

          http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rabbi-jason-miller/delta-airlines-saudi-arabia_b_883202.html

          • southwood

            Excuse me, friend, but I am not a liar ! I perhaps have incorrect information but that was what I read. You however are definitely stupid. I crossed swords with you before so to speak and you make no sense at all.Obviously eveyrone else on this forum thumbing me down is clueless too. You so-called American conservatives are so rude and self righteous it’s no wonder the left don’t take to you at all.

          • filter

            You may not be an intentional liar, but you are deluded and spreading lies.

          • southwood

            What lies ? EVIDENCE ?

          • filter

            Evidence in this thread – most of your comments.

          • southwood

            No, what evidence have you to refute my comments ?

          • filter

            Look, I read this whole thread; that’s my opinion of you and I sure DO NOT have to justify it to you.

            You also seem very needy and needling at the same time.
            Done with you.

          • southwood

            Oh right I get it, you’re an idiot. Whew ! Had me worried I might be lying there for a minute.

          • filter
        • Hass

          What a stupid comment. You don’t know much about SA, do you?

          • southwood

            The OFFICIAL policy of SA was not to disallow Jews into the country. Perhaps that has changed . Can you refute the facts about the US arms trade to SA, mister Saudi expert ? SA is an oil rich nation with an American al Jazeera TV station, it has part ownership of Fox News has it not (better rely on that “conservative” channel for the low down on Islam, eh?) ?, and other business interests in America, not to mention the wonderful US President who bowed and scraped before the financiers of mosques worldwide, one of the worst hegemonies on earth.

          • Drakken

            It is Israeli citizens and those who have a Israeli entry stamp on their passports who are not allowed, and God help you if you are wearing a star of David around your neck. The funny thing about our supplying the Saudi’s with weapons is that the dumbazz savages can’t fix or repair them without significant western help, if we infidels left the Saudi peninsula tomorrow, Saudi would grind to a halt inside of a month.

          • southwood

            Not only that but wasn’t it the Americans and British who showed them how to suck the oil out of the ground in the first place ? Without infidel technological know how they would still be trying to work out how to produce the oil. I honestly think SA is the worst, most dangerous state on earth.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            “I honestly think SA is the worst, most dangerous state on earth.”

            Really? Not the Islamofascist Regime of Iran? Not the Islamofascist Regime of Pakistan?

            I know that neo-commies hate SA because they see SA as an ally of the US.

          • defcon 4

            Is it better to be waist deep in excrement? Or merely ankle deep?

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Half empty or half full?

          • defcon 4

            I more meant that choosing between Soddy Barbaria, Pakistain and Iran isn’t much of a choice at all. It’s kinda like choosing between the SA and the SS.

          • southwood

            On second thoughts SA is NOT the most dangerous state on earth. That is the Vatican, but that’s probably beyond your understanding. However SA IS most definitely the most dangerous and worst Islamic nation. It, above all others, exports Islam, builds mosques and madrassas where jihad is taught as has been found out in UK schools. Yet, amazingly, you put a perverse spin on all that by implying that criticizing SA might make you a “neo-commie”. I suppose you are implying that I am a neo-commie whatever that is. Ah, the old ad hominem, the old unfounded allegation, typical of that used by the liberal leftist, if I may say so. If you are denouncing criticism of SA then you are a virtual collaborator with Islam. Reflect on that.

            Iran and Pakistan, if you do not know, hold elections. Pakistan, although it persecutes Christians, still allows Churches to be established. SA does NOT. It is ruled by a dynasty.

          • defcon 4

            The Vatican? I never realized it was the Vatican that was behind the worldwide islamic predilection for persecuting, murdering and raping the najjis kaffir.

          • southwood

            That’s because you don’t want to know. You need to know how they support Islam, are against the state of Israel, and want world domination. You have a LOT to learn.

          • defcon 4

            Do you have any proof for this “theory”?

          • southwood

            Do I have to do the research for you. It’s all out there. It’s well documented. Here’s a nice photo to get you kick started:

          • defcon 4

            So, it’s the Vatican who pulls the strings in Tehran, Riyadh, Mogadishu, Cairo, Islamabad (or is it Karachi?), Ankara and Baghdad? Gee, who would’ve thunk it.

          • southwood

            Heap all the scorn you want, pal, but you can be sure the Vatican has its dirty fingers in every behind the scenes intrigue on the planet. They have your USA by the you know whats too.

          • ziggy zoggy

            The Catholic Church can’t even preserve its own traditions and edicts, much less impose them on the rest of the world. You sound like a nut when you write stuff like that.

          • southwood

            I don’t care what I sound like. I know what I believe. If you think the RC organization hasn’t got massive power you are not awake to reality. It’s involved worldwide in business, finance and the media. It has powerful men and women in high places. Take the US. You have vice president Biden, speaker Boehner, Pelosi, most of the Supreme Court. Funny how in a majority protestant nation like America, not one member of the Supreme Court is protestant. Did you see the funeral of John Paul II ? All the world leaders were there. Why ? Most of them were not Roman Catholics. Why does every US president go and have an audience with the pope ? Obama did that on his first presidential trip abroad. No president of the US has since the mid 20th century become president without the nod from the Roman Catholic constituency. The EU is the invention of Roman Catholics. The Vatican has a large input there too.

          • ziggy zoggy

            51% of Americans are Protestant and only 24% are Catholic. There are currently six Catholic Supreme Court Justices and three Jews. There is nothing nefarious about any of this. You are wildly overstating the Church’s influence. It has hardly any at all on the American government. 24% of Americans who happen to be Catholic doesn’t even represent a voting bloc.

            The majority of Europeans are atheists and EU policies reflect that.

          • southwood

            First of all you need some educating. The RC system is the great apostasy forecast in 2 Thessalonians chapter 2. It is not “catholic”. It is Romanist. Catholic refers to the universal church of Jesus Christ. Rome has perverted the gospel by adding doctrines such as purgatory and prayers to dead saints. “Nothing sinister about Catholic doctrine”. LOL. It is the most deceptive doctrine around, worse than Islam, which is more openly anti-Christian. If you do not realize the political power of the Vatican then you really are naive. I will leave it there. Believe what you want but you can’t kid me about Romanism.

          • defcon 4

            If it’s worse than Islam, then maybe you should put on your walking boots and go live in any islam0nazi state — where the Catholic Church is, if it exists at all, a fast disappearing phenomenon.

          • southwood

            Get back to me on this when the “Catholic Church” takes over as the head of the one world religion. Try out your boots then, if you can find somewhere to hide, that is.

          • kikorikid

            Once upon a time the son of a Saudi Prince took
            his allowance and founded a group which,eventually,
            flew airliners into very tall buildings,killing thousands.
            Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia? Glass em.

          • defcon 4

            A couple of years ago Drakken, I saw an ad in an engineering magazine for aerospace engineering grads to go work in Soddy Barbaria.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Does the UK sell weapons systems to SA?

            Are there Sharia Law enclaves in London?

            Did the UK release the convicted bomber of Pan Am 103?

            Does the UK have a member of Parliament who has a show on Irans Press TV?

            The UK needs to step up and fight back and clean up its own house.

          • southwood

            I will address all 4 points in order.

            1. Ditto the US. So your point is ?

            2. There appear to be, yes, but what happened in Dearbornistan, Michigan, when Christians were arrested merely for evangelizing. It was claimed they were harassing Muslims. Yet Muslims who threw bottles and excrement and physically harassed the Christians were left uncharged. Shariah USA. Coming to a town near you. Oh, and did Nidal carry out a jihad, or was it just plain mass murder ?

            3. At least he was an old dying man, past his usefulness, that is, if indeed, he was guilty. That was not conclusively proven.

            4..At least our PM did not use tax payers money to go on Paki TV to apologize to the Pakis for the “unacceptable” cartoon, which your government clearly stated, caused the deaths of 4 Americans in Benghazi. Nor do we have a leader who says to the UN that any criticism of Islam is unacceptable, oh, and that Islam has made a great contribution to America throughout history. That last statement has got to go down as one of the quotes of the 21st century.

            Other points to consider:

            Did the US tacitly support the IRA during its campaign of murdering people in NI ? It took 9/11 before the US outlawed the IRA. I won’t go into detail about President Clinton’s devious role in setting up the
            Muslim state of Bosnia.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            The US fights jihadis.

            The UK fetes them. Gives them seats in their Parliament. george galloway for example – a quisling with a scottish accent.

            Islamists openly threatens the UK and Eurabia for 9/11 scale attacks. The UK does nothing.

            The US monitors mosques. Does the UK?

            Americans know that Brits hate the US. Perhaps because the sun has set on their empire.

          • roccolore

            This is the same UK that banned Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer ,while letting in Muslims who advocate stoning rape victims and hanging gays.

          • southwood

            Yes, the UK monitors mosques, and Muslim schools. Did you not hear of the school closed only a couple of days ago ? We also have MPs calling for the Muslim burka to be banned.

            Galloway is a disgrace, despicable. But then you have racebaiter Holder and he’s the AG.

            Mexican illegals by their millions pour into the USA. Does your pres.send them back ? No, he offers them amnesty. And the good conservative republican Rubio agrees !

            Some Brits DO hate the US. Others love the US, or at least what is left of what we recognize as the US. But some English hate the Scots, yet the two nations are part of the UK. Not everyone in every country loves any other particular country. Some Americans hate the UK. Old Joe Kennedy wanted America to ally with Hitler against Britain in WWII.

          • ziggy zoggy

            It’s pretty obvious that America and the U.K. both have $hitty and unrepresentative governments. The only question is what proportion of our populations go along with this pro-islamic crap.

            I know for a fact that the majority of Americans (and illegal Mexicans) absolutely loathe Islam. I assume that there will be a backlash against muslims and their fellow travelers eventually, but it may take awhile.

          • southwood

            At the moment, and I cannot prove this to be the true picture, I am just speculating based on what I read; the majority of UK non-Muslim citizens are just trying to ignore reality on this issue. When people live in nice neighbourhoods where there are hardly any immigrants; when they have well paid jobs,a busy social life, pastimes and sports, comfortable houses, cars and so on, then why worry about something “out there” ? It’s for the plebs to worry about, or for the politicians to provide solutions. Having said that, I reckon, of those non-Muslims who are awake to the threat to the UK from Islam, the majority would probably like to see repatriation, certainly a halt to immigration. A backlash will come. How can it be otherwise when Islam is becoming more and more aggressive and seeking domination. Many people will stand up against that. If they don’t then it’s submission and bye bye, UK, Europe, even America.

          • defcon 4

            “Islamists” the delineation without a difference.

          • southwood

            Yep, the ol’ US sure ’nuff knows how to fight the Muzzies better than us Brits !

            http://frontpagemag.com/2013/robert-spencer/the-muslim-brotherhoods-man-in-the-white-house/

          • kikorikid

            YES!, Unfortunately many in the UK still think
            of the U.S.A as “Colonist” .

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            How many “progressives” in the UK smirked over the Fort Hood massacre?

            The same s c u m smirked over the beheading of Lee Rigby.

            The UK has Estrogen poisoning.

            When British sailors were kidnapped by the iranians, your “love boat” crusie ship sailors, except for four decent Brits, where shown waving goodby to their “hosts’ holding shopping bags of gifts.

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Iranian_seizure_of_Royal_Navy_personnel

            The US embassy hostages never kowtowed to their captors as yours did.

            Should I bring up Price Charles and Camilla?

            I DO have respect for Queen Elizabeth and her parents. They didn’t cut and run during WW2.

          • defcon 4

            Wrong liar. Soddy Barbaria wanted to vet US soldiers going to fight in Kuwait to insure none of them were Jewish. When Jerry Brown, governor of California, agreed to send CalTrans workers to Soddy Barbaria they once again tried to vet all the workers to insure none of them were Jewish.

          • southwood

            So tell me, did your govt.agree to that proposal ? Also, please, tell me why your govt. and other bodies are so keen on SA ? What is it about SA that appeals so much ? Why, tell me, does your President not allow certain US oil fields to be utilized ? Tell me that, liar.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Some countries have no principles when it comes to money and Libyan oil contracts.

            BP’s Role in Pan Am Bomber’s Release Questioned

            http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503543_162-20010673-503543.html

          • southwood

            Ditto the US and SA.

          • defcon 4

            Does that mean the owners are allowed in the holey kingdom of Soddy Barbaria? Because I don’t see any evidence of your assertion that Soddy Barbaria allows Jews into its holey islam0fascist state anywhere in that article.

          • defcon 4

            Let’s see some proof that Soddy Barbaria doesn’t bar Jews from entering your holey islam0fascist state.

          • southwood

            Oh, what’s wrong, are you too lazy to do your own research ? Give me a break. Do some work on this. It not that hard. Otherwise just remain naive but don’t bother me if you can’t offer some intelligent response.

      • kikorikid

        Non-Muslims are NOT allowed into Mecca. Just
        like NO-GO ZONES in EU-UK.

        • southwood

          Or Christians in the Dearborn Arab festival.

  • N. Wasse

    I will tell the followers of the religion of peace! Let us have a deal: Delete all the Christian-phobia and Jewish-phobia and Hindu and Buddhist-phobia and kuffar-phobia and women-phobia in the Qur’an and then we can have a deal
    But the truth is if all this hate is deleted the Arabian book of ignorance would shrink to a few pages

    • DK

      This is the correct approach. Make this UN motion include all religions and cultures. Disallow killing of Christians in Egypt, iran, Arabia, etc, and killing of Hindus in Kasmir by the mohamidists; ad infinitum. Disallow subjection of women to second class status in all cultures. That would be a UN movement worth pursuing. Guess how many of the OIC countries would approve such movement.

      • defcon 4

        They would approve, they just wouldn’t enforce.

  • JVictor

    The goal of the OIC is an all out assault on religious freedom. The objective is the total opposite of why Messianic Jew Cristobal Colon (more commonly known as Christopher Columbus) “sailed the ocean blue” to find a place where practicing Jews, Messianic Jews, and non-Catholic Christians could live and worship and thrive; it’s the total opposite of why the Puritans migrated to the New World. Why am I not surprised that the UN and other progressive bodies, like the current Obama-influenced US State Department, are not fighting this repressive and regressive endeavor?

    Hillary Clinton has said that the Constitution of the United States guarantees the “freedom of worship.” It does no such thing; it guarantees “freedom of religion,” which is completely different. “Freedom of worship” allows one to worship the deity of their choice in a controlled setting and environment. That is all. “Freedom of religion” allows one to not only worship but to live out their faith which includes attempting to persuade others to join them. Even if Islam is not bashed or assailed for its egregious errors or taken to task for its sanctioning of killing the infidels, proselytizing of any sort will be seen as “Islamophobia” thereby making one guilty of violating the proposed decree.

    Freedom of speech and freedom of religion are under serious attack. The west, in general, and the United States, in particular, need to wake up.

  • roccolore

    No suprise that liberals love Islam.

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      “liberals”and “progressives” love Islam due to their common enemy.

      US and the defunct Europe.

  • logdon

    After the Benghazi debacle Obama, following the narrative of blaming an innocent film maker, stepped up to the podium in the UN and in one stroke attempted to rein in freedom of expression not only in the USA but globally.

    His words, ‘the future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam’ clearly denoted which side he was on and from a choice of a democratic and free west or a dictatorial and repressive Islam he chose the latter.

    Not only was the basis of this outrageous attack on free speech a downright lie to cover his criminal abandonment of an Ambassador and his protective team but also a step into areas completely beyond his jurisdiction.

    He does not represent me or any other citizen outside America yet here was this pompous demagogue attempting to tell me and the rest of the world what they can and cannot say.

    Amazingly for such an outrageous flexing of his pro Islamic muscle there was no outcry or uproar and a ho, hum media stayed as silent as they would be forced into if ever the OIC gained the leverage they so avidly crave.

    When the so called leader of the free world can call for such obviously single sided curtailment of free speech he quite openly lays his cards on the table and without any shame or caveat declares his allegiance.

    He is a traitor and together with his leg tingling and grovelling MSM is out to destroy America and with it the rest of us.

    Amazingly it’s taken an ex KGB hard man and the premier Muslim nation, Egypt to put him in his place and in so doing does us all a huge favour which is about as ludicrous as it gets.

    It all of course hinges on his blackness which gives him the free pass and whether it’s our BBC, a starstruck Cameron or just about every msm outlet in the US, the genuflection is embarassing to the point of parody.

    I come second to no one in my defence of equality but when the terms of that concept are dictated by one side and one side only, it completely looses all meaning.

    This naked emperor has now abandoned all pretence and whether stuffing his administration with Muslim Brotherhood members or rooting for an Islamist dictator in Egypt he makes himself abundantly clear.

    America, after the briefest of mourning periods following the worst attack on its soil ever and committed by Muslims in the express name of their faith, now has a Muslim President.

    It is that simple and puts that other benchmark of meaningless appeasement, Chamberlains Munich Pact completely into the shade.

    Things will never be the same.

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      The UIK at the highest levels is not immune to appeasing Islamist ideology at the expense of non-Muslms.

      The UK released the convicted bomber of Pan Am 103, on “compassionate” grounds, which were in fact for the “compassion” for Libyan oil contracts for British oil companies.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_Am_Flight_103

      • southwood

        The UK ? What about the US govt. disallowing any mention of Islamic terrorism by the military ? What about the US govt. making sure the Boston bomber got his Miranda right. Don’t preach your self righteous garbage to us Brits, pal. .Get your own house in order first ‘cos it’s a mess !

        • Drakken

          We are all in the same boat my friend, we either stand together, or hang separately.

          • southwood

            I have to agree with you.

          • logdon

            I agree, Drakken.

            Too much grandstanding from the blowhards.

            And too much talking about Glock’s and 9 Mils and what they’d do with them if a ‘Muzzie’ crossed their path.

            It’s as if Fifty Cent suddenly got white. Why should anyone want to emulate those looser thugs?

            The fact is that whilst it’s bad here in Britain things are decidedly iffy in the USA and Obama’s elevation of Elibiary and co into key defence roles whilst scrubbing all link between Islam and terrorism within the FBI indicates the direction he’s heading.

            I got this dvd last year and it is seriously frightening but compulsive viewing.

            http://www.amazon.com/The-Project-Joe-Weasel/dp/B009SVANG8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1382474695&sr=8-1&keywords=the+project

            Meanwhile we’ve got the useless Cameron who in vain attempt at grabbing a few Muslim votes is now attempting the equivalent of telling us that the Earth is flat.

            No one outside the dhimmi BBC and Guardian believes him and looking at the polls he is finished.

            What replaces him is crucial. If Labour win its curtains. If Nigel Farage’s UKIP can surge we’re on the road to revival.

            Similarly in the US if Hilary of Benghazi cops it we’re all in the merde and that includes Europe.

            And looking at the McCains, Lyndseys and Boehners facing her she’s in with a big chance.

            What then?

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            How about a campaign in the UK to Boycott and Divest and Sanction any company which advertises in Der Guardian?

          • logdon

            That would be the BBC then.

            If not for the revenue provided to the Guardian by their recruitment ads the paper would have collapsed years ago.

            Nice little cosy cabal going there. All extreme, ultra politically correct lefties in it together.

          • SCREW SOCIALISM

            Recruitment ads? They still exist in the UK?

            Online Job sites haven’t crushed printed jobs ads in the UK as they have in the US?

            The NY Times used to have lots of job ads, but they’ve been moved online.

            Bottom line is that I find it hard to believe that Der Guardian continues to exist thanks to Job ads revenue. It must be in part to advertisers (Boycott ‘em) and perhaps wealthy backers of a socialist bent.

          • logdon

            BBC spends 86% of its recruitment budget in the Guardian

            http://order-order.com/2010/09/07/bbc-is-the-guardianistas-broadcasting-arm/

          • Drakken

            As much as I really hate to say this, and as history as my guide, we are on our way soon to a very uncivil war on the lines of the Balkans with ethnic and religious overtones. We are beyond the tipping point of fixing it, it now is going to crash and hard, it unfortunately is now inevitable. Nobody is going to get out of this mess unscathed, but the strong amongst us will prevail against the tyranny of the weak and they will rise to the top. What we end up with as govts is a crap shoot, hopefully, a strong Monarch in your country in Britain will reign in the idiots in charge and get the Tower in London back in business. Bottom line, we are in for some very bloody and brutal times ahead.

          • southwood

            You really think Farage can save the UK ? I wish I had your optimism but I don’t. It’s all gone way too far and what took UKIP so long to get involved in the domestic scene ? I can only see a European wide or even transAtlantic resolution to the problems we face.

          • logdon

            Europe is even worse than Britain.

            Sweden, for instance just more or less opened the door to Syrians.

            Italy is becoming swamped. Spain doesn’t seem to care. Germany is still infected by war guilt.

            Marine le Pen seems to be doing well and maybe she’ll pull off a miracle. But expect major rioting and mayhem.

            Obviously the EU is up to it’s grubby fingers in Saudi chicanery, backhanders and fraud.

            At least Farage would remove the dead hand of that lot. And put a halt to further immigration.

            As for the US, Obama has three more years of destruction to carry out his islamification programme and it looks again that half of the US aren’t over worried.

            Couple that with a completely useless GOP and in comes Hillary to finish the job.

            Whites are now a minority in London. The East End is more or less an outcrop of Pakistan and Bangladesh.

            Here’s what is going on. And if you follow the further links tagged to the story you’ll see the affect its having.

            http://www.eastlondonadvertiser.co.uk/news/court-crime/video_horrific_whitechapel_bottle_attack_caught_on_cctv_1_2914323

          • southwood

            I know Europe is worse than the UK. Sweden is a basket case, Norway too. Italy is as you describe it. France has a huge Muslim problem in the metropolitan ban lieus and inside Marseilles. Denmark has no go areas for the police. In Germany the Turks won’t integrate. What I would like ideally is a Europe wide coalition of right of centre parties like the Sweden Democrats and Die Freiheit in Germany, maybe Wilders’ party in the Netherlands too, but NOT the dodgy crypto fascist parties such as the Austrian Freedom party or Vlaams Belaang. Le Pen ? Mmm dubious, there’s an anti American element there. However, I cannot see even if a coalition were to succeed in gaining a power base in Europe, how can we deal with Muslim demographics without repatriation. They are breeding at 4 times the rate of the Nordic, Slav and Latin races. Big problem. I leave it in God’s hands. I sympathize with you about the state of London. What would our heroic forefathers say if they were alive ?

        • SCREW SOCIALISM

          YOU Brits are a big part of the problem.

          The US Left gets many of its ideology from the UK Lefties.

          Rampant Socialism is rapidly destroying the UK and the infection is spreading to the US.

          Muslims in the UK openly threaten the UK and Eurabia with 9/11 scale attacks. I’ve seen pictures of the Islamofascist demos. The UK is MUCH worse off than the US when it comes to tolerance of Islamofascists.

          And the fascist BNP, British nazi Party is more prominent in the UK than any fascist party in the US.

          The UK calls its Muslims “Asians”. Come on pal.

          The US has never released a convicted Islamofascist murder on “compassionate” grounds. The assassin of US Senator Robert F. Kennedy is still in prison.

          I am disgusted by the UK.

        • kikorikid

          Agreed. All that you mention are Obamas attempt
          to remain/become Shariah Compliant. Stomping
          on our Constitution in the process. Our history here
          indicates Americans will, eventually, throw off
          the Jackboot of Tyranny.

          • southwood

            You think firearms will be able to deal tyranny ? Somehow I doubt it.

          • defcon 4

            Better to die on your feet than live on your knees.

          • southwood

            How about it’s better not to have to do either ? Yep. that would be a whole lot better.

    • Johnnie the Jew

      With you all the way here friend. A splendid diatribe against the most crass of cretins who has the audacity to tell both the Nigerians and the Burmese to respect the human rights of uneducated, illiterate savages in the course of hunting them down after committing heinous crimes against humanity, particularly in Nigeria.They relinquish their human rights as soon as they start preparing their acts of violence and should be considered fair game to any reasonable human. But, not this twat of a dhimmi. Bollocks to ALL demands for blasphemy laws that protect this hideous totalitarian, retarded paedo worshipping cult.

  • JAMAL

    FRIENDS I BRING YOU MANY GREETS AND PEACES FROM QATAR. I WRITE JUST TO SAY THAT IT IS IMPORTANT FOR RESPECT TO BE INTO ISLAM. YES IT IS CRIMINAL TO ON MUHAMMAD (PEACE ON HIM) SIN FOR HE IS THE GREAT PROPHET. YOU MUST KNOW ON ISLAM IT IS FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE A BEATIFUL LIFE WAY. DID YOU KNOW THAT ISLAM HAS FOR CHRISTIAN AND JEWISTS SPECIAL RESPECT LAWS FOR AL KEETAB (I KNOW NOT OF ENGLISH FOR THIS)? SO PLEASE FOR ISLAM RESPECT AS WELL. I WISH MANY BLESSINGS ON YOU AND YOUR FAMILIES.

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      JAMAL,

      May your prophet of Satan, muhammed, continue to BURN in H E L L for all time.

      INSHALLAH!

    • N. Wasse

      Your so called prophet Mo was an Arabian warlord and caravan raider and this is what Ibn Ishaq tells us so was Ibn Ishaq an Isalomphobe too? You see we kuffar only tell you what your Islamic sources tell us so if you do not like what we are saying then destroy your Islamic sources and good riddance

    • defcon 4

      I SELL MUCH HEALTHY CAMEL URINE FOR GOOD MOSLEM MAN. HEALTHY TO DRINK AND TASTE SO GOOD. MAKE YOU STRONG FOR WOMAN AND IN JIHAD.

    • Hass

      You can keep lying to yourself and the gullible LeftTurds, but you’ve come to the wrong site to spread your BS cause most commenters here know more about Islam than a lot of the Muslimes themselves.

      • Jane

        How can I not agree?

    • iluvisrael

      it’s lil jamal – go suck pig turds

    • Trofim

      Bollocks to Islam. Bollocks to the Quran. Bollocks to Mohamed.

    • kikorikid

      SO, Jamal, “Special Respect Laws” are those that apply to
      Dhimmis, the conquered, who must DIE or pay Jizya, JIZYA
      being the imposed Tax that buys “toleration” of Muslims.
      If a Dhimmi refuses to pay he/she and their family get their
      throats cut.
      Piss on your demand for respect. Taqiyya allows you
      to throw a verbal fluff job over criminal extortion.
      One day soon you Islamist will commit an act so
      heinous that you will earn hell on earth, your Islamist
      Capitals will become shimmering pools of molten sand and,
      unlike the Mongels, will not go away. You and the other
      three Islamist left can sit in an oasis and roll camel turds
      back and forth to each other.

  • SCREW SOCIALISM

    May the prophet of Satan, muhammed, continue to BURN in H E L L for all time.

    INSHALLAH!

  • therealpm

    I’m as islamophobic as it’s possible to be, and damned proud of it too. Anyone with a functioning brain in their head must loathe this vile ideology that aims to impose itself upon the entire planet regardless of whether the people actually want it or not. I can hardly express in words just how disgusted I am by its Dark Age barbarism, its outright misogyny and Jew hatred, and its total and utter contempt for everyone other than the Ummah.

    Islam opposes everything that is decent, honest and dignified about the human spirit. It truly reflects the dark side of human nature; that of the beast as opposed to that of the civilised man. Ronald Reagan once referred to the Soviet Union as the evil empire, but the evil empire we face today is not Marxist but Islamic.

  • LindaRivera

    Muslims immigrants to Britain and Europe unlike immigrants who came before them are NOT expected to make any contributions to society! They are not
    EXPECTED to work! Muslims are provided with free money, free homes, free
    healthcare and luxury goods! Desperate, homeless British vets and other homeless Britons live on the streets DENIED help!

    In France, Muslims are eager to show how much they appreciate infidel generosity by burning lots and lots of infidel cars.

    In non-Muslim countries, Muslims never stop accusing. Never stop condemning non-Muslims. Always DEMANDING special rights that will DESTROY our merciful Western culture and civilization and replace it with an Islamic one. Barbaric halal
    slaughter DESTROYS our precious Western civilization.

    I don’t believe in the Muslim DEATH god! We infidels believe in our Glorious, Awesome Creator! We believe in God’s eternal Laws: YOU SHALL NOT MURDER.

    We are called Islamophobes because we believe it is WRONG to hurt other people! Barbaric mass murderer, founder of Islam, Mohammad was a HUGE slave trader who married a six year old child when he was in his fifties. Mohammad is regarded as the perfect man and role model by devout Muslims.

    We are called Islamophobes because we believe in God’s Laws! God gave the
    death sentence for kidnapping/slave taking.

    Bible Exodus 21:16
    He who kidnaps a man whether he sells him or he is found in his possession, shall surely be put to death.

    I am proud to be an Islamophobe! I am proud to believe in our Wonderful, Precious Awesome God Who cares so deeply for the humanity that He lovingly created.

    The 1,400 years of the horror and suffering of the cruel, EVIL, forbidden-by-God, Islamic practice of Muslims taking slaves continues to this day in Sudan, Mauritania and other countries. And Muslims are upset with Islamophobes for hating Islam.

    Jihad Slavery in Sudan, with Dr Charles Jacobs
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NP4Fcx7AE_o

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      The big problem is that the UK kowtows to Islamofascist demands.

      The UK has lost pride in its history.

      SCREW the BNP too. Choosing between the BNP and Islamofascists is like deciding what fatal disease to adopt.

      How about the UK choosing Democracy and equal treatment over fascism/islamofascism.

  • LindaRivera

    The 1,400 years of the horror and suffering of the cruel, EVIL, forbidden-by-God, Islamic practice of Muslims taking slaves continues to this day in Sudan, Mauritania and other countries.

    Jihad Slavery in Sudan, with Dr Charles Jacobs
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NP4Fcx7AE_o

    • defcon 4

      Has anyone noticed how the enemedia completely ignores the fact of legalized islam0nazi slavery?

      • LindaRivera

        SILENCE IS CONSENT! By their silence, wicked Western leaders and wicked Western media AID and ABET the terrible evil of MUSLIM slave taking and satanic atrocities perpetrated against the slaves, and the many and constant barbaric atrocities and murders of non-Muslims by Muslims perpetrated daily in many countries.

        • defcon 4

          Yes, silence is consent. And WHO is more silent than the islam0nazis of the world?

  • Anto de Chav

    This will be near impossible to enforce unless they want to try and prosecute thousands,maybe tens of thousands of people.. we in the west don’t need or want this vicious cult in out culture (apart from a few crackpot lefties)

    • Trofim

      prosecute tens of thousands of people . . ?

      Millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions of people

      • Anto de Chav

        True… together we can make this law a real ball buster for the liberal fascists…

    • defcon 4

      People have already been charged, arrested and prosecuted for defaming islam in places like Canada, the UK and France. As well as Dearbornistan, Michigan. Do you really think the corrupt US federal government won’t be willing to go to the expense of doing so here? Especially considering the zero administration used the IRS to persecute his political opposition.

      • Anto de Chav

        If the figures run into millions it will be near impossible.. can’t wait to see the back of the zero admin… scum of the earth

        • defcon 4

          I’m sure people in the Weimar Republic were saying the same thing about the Nazis. They would never round up people based on their religious persuasion, it would be too costly, too immoral etc.

  • defcon 4

    Who knows what goes on in Dearbornistan, Michigan these days? Do you really think the local media in Dearbornistan would report any civil rights violations committed by the Dearbornistan P.D. in the name of islam? Have they ever done so in the past?

    • kikorikid

      Keep in mind that Eric Holder has stated that if
      there are civil rights violations and the victim is White,
      the Laws will not be enforced.

  • USARetired

    No dam international organization has the right, nor ability to circumvent the constitution of this United States of America, So help us God!

    • kikorikid

      HEAR! HEAR!

    • ObamaYoMoma

      Tell that to the Left, which today includes both Dhimmicrats and Republicans, as both major political parties are really just two sides of the same leftwing coin.

    • southwood

      I think you’ll find that you are wrong. Sorry, pal, but there’s a globalist agenda and people’s petty “rights” won’t stand in their way. Your US constitution is in danger too.

  • kikorikid

    They,OIC et al, are practicing a form of TAQIYYA in order to
    bring about Shariah Compliance. Obama is Sharia Compliant.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Instead, the OIC requests that the media censor their reports about Islamic terrorism, Islamic persecution of religious minorities and human rights violations committed in the name of Islam, as an interim step toward the criminalization of such speech. All of this will only serve to increase, not decrease “Islamophobia.”

    Well the OIC notwithstanding, it is not Islamic terrorism. As a matter of fact, Muslims aren’t terrorists at all, as that is misinformation, i.e., leftwing propaganda. Indeed, Muslims are not victims reacting to Western Imperialism; they also are not victims reacting to America’s interventionist foreign policy; in the case of Israel, Muslims are not victims reacting to harsh Israeli policies; and finally Muslims aren’t political extremists at all perpetrating terrorism against innocents. Instead, Muslims are jihadists, i.e., Mujahideen (holy warriors), fighting a holy war (jihad) in the cause of Allah for the establishment and expansion of Islam. As the sole fundamental purpose of Islam is the subjugation of all religions and all infidels into Islamic totalitarianism through both violent and non-violent jihad (holy war) and the eventual imposition of Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law, in order to make Islam supreme throughout the world.

    Indeed, study the infamous sword verses of the Koran, which were some of the very last verses issued by Muhammad shortly before his death. Study also the universally accepted throughout Islam “Doctrine of Abrogation”, which holds that when two verses of the Koran conflict with each other, i.e., contradict each other, the latter issued verses of the Koran, i.e., those issued by Muhammad later on in his career, abrogate, i.e., supersede and replace, the earlier issued verses of the Koran. Thus, since the infamous sword verses of the Koran, which commands all Muslims to wage jihad (holy war) against all religions and all infidels in order to subjugate them into Islamic totalitarianism through the imposition of Sharia in order to make Islam supreme throughout the world, were some of the very last verses issued by Muhammad just shortly before his death, they abrogate, i.e., supersede and replace, all earlier issued peaceful verses of the Koran in which they conflict with.

    Thus, when Muslims cite peaceful verses of the Koran, as they always inevitably do to “falsely” demonstrate that Islam is a so-called “religion of peace”, they are obviously using taqiyya, i.e., dissimulation, to dupe gullible useful idiot infidels since they are citing what are, as a matter of fact, abrogated verses of the Koran that are no longer in force or even applicable except for duping gullible useful idiot infidels.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Supposedly, the purpose of the conference was to support an OIC campaign to “correct the image of Islam and Muslims in Europe and North America.”

    In reality, the OIC is a jihadist organization very similar to the Muslim Brotherhood, as it wages jihad (holy war) primarily non-violently via stealth and deception. Again, Muslims aren’t terrorists, as that’s leftwing propaganda. Instead, they are jihadists, i.e., mujahideen (holy warriors), waging jihad (holy war) both violently and non-violently, but overall astronomically far more non-violently relative to violently against all religions and all infidels to subjugate them into Islamic totalitarianism through the eventual imposition of Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law, in order to make Islam supreme throughout the world. Indeed, it’s a very preemptive and aggressive holy war (jihad), as opposed to it being just willy-nilly terrorism in response to Western provocations as the left, which comprises today both Dhimmicrats and Republicans, would have us believe.

    • defcon 4

      You’re telling the ugly truth OYM, a truth that no one wants to read or hear. The kind of truth that got Meir Kahane murdered by a muslime in NYC. The kind of truth that got Theo Van Gogh murdered in the streets of Amsterdam, in broad daylight, by a muslime, while the citizens of that fine state did absolutely NOTHING.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    The OIC is a 57 member organization consisting of Muslim countries whose long term goal is the worldwide implementation of Sharia law and seemingly the ultimate establishment of a Caliphate.
    Its members tend to vote together as a block in the UN, so it is
    extremely powerful, despite the fact that few people have heard of it.

    You should mention that Sharia law is considered to be divine and infallible by all Muslims because it emanates directly from Allah (God), i.e., it is the “will of Allah” and also what all Muslims must totally, completely, and unconditionally submit to under the penalty of death for blasphemy and apostasy. Indeed, according to Islam it must supersede all imperfect laws that emanate from very fallible man. Moreover, Sharia is also Islamic totalitarian law. As a matter of fact, the word totalitarian should always be associated with the word Sharia, especially because Sharia is 100 percent totalitarian.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Its present goal is the international criminalization of all speech that “defames” Islam, which the OIC defines as anything that sheds a negative light on Islam or Muslims, even when it’s true.

    Again, Muslims aren’t terrorists, as that is absurd leftwing propaganda. Instead, they are jihadists waging jihad in the cause of Allah to ultimately make Islam supreme, and the OIC is a non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad organization, very similar to the Muslim Brotherhood and AQ, that is waging non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad in this case against all religions and all infidels to render them into Islamic totalitarianism via the imposition of Sharia. Indeed, it’s a war. It’s not just terrorism. Muslims aren’t victims perpetrating terrorism in response to the West. They are waging jihad (holy war) preemptively against all religions and all infidels. Indeed, if the OIC were successful, it would mean that all opposition to Islam and Sharia (Islamic totalitarian law) is racist and illegal. In other words, it would represent the surrender of the infidel world to Islam. As a matter of fact, they are seeking to exploit the Lefts unhinged obsession with racism, victimhood, and political correctness in order to stop all opposition.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Unfortunately, the OIC has been fairly successful in passing UN resolutions that if implemented, would have the effect of stifling speech that “defames religions.”

    The sad thing is Islam is not even a religion. Instead, it is a very totalitarian cult masquerading as being a religion in order to dupe its intended victims.

  • southwood

    I am disgusted by the USA. It’s a disgrace now.

  • Tuco

    I was inclined to “share” this article on Facebook, but when I clicked a link to come to it here I was hit with not ONE, not TWO but THREE friggin’ pop-up ads. I’ll never again darken the door of Frontpage Mag and damnsure won’t be referring anyone else to come here. — OUT

    • filter

      So you can’t even figure out how to install popup blockers ON your OWN computer? You just blame someone else? Gees….
      BTW, FB is for kids.

  • Fred

    Vain attempt. The cat’s out of the bag. Too many people are speaking out. They really won’t or can’t go after the millions who will not be stopped from doing so.

  • henrikrclausen

    An extensive analysis of the fallacy of “Islamophobia” can be found here:
    http://www.libertiesalliance.org/2013/09/22/problematic-definition-islamophobia/

    I hope more writers and commentators will challenge the deeply flawed instrument that OIC uses to assault freedom of speech and consience in the free world.