<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abdulrahman al-Awlaki and Why You Shouldn&#8217;t Stand Next to an Al Qaeda Terrorist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 22:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: BoulderBiker</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4389461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BoulderBiker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4389461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not the left, I&#039;m on the left. It&#039;s stupid people not do their own research. Right has a lot of them. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s not the left, I&#039;m on the left. It&#039;s stupid people not do their own research. Right has a lot of them. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4365267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4365267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe you&#039;d have paid attention, if your son would&#039;ve been there ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you&#039;d have paid attention, if your son would&#039;ve been there </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rubin Mathias</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4365260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rubin Mathias]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4365260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Nor was he a member of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninusla. Nor was he &quot;an inspiration,&quot; as his father styled himself, for those determined to draw American blood; nor had he gone &quot;operational,&quot; as American authorities said his father had, in drawing up plots against Americans and American interests. He was a boy who hadn&#039;t seen his father in two years, since his father had gone into hiding. He was a boy who knew his father was on an American kill list and who snuck out of his family&#039;s home in the early morning hours of September 4, 2011, to try to find him. He was a boy who was still searching for his father when his father was killed, and who, on the night he himself was killed, was saying goodbye to the second cousin with whom he&#039;d lived while on his search, and the friends he&#039;d made. He was a boy among boys, then; a boy among boys eating dinner by an open fire along the side of a road when an American drone came out of the sky and fired the missiles that killed them all.&quot; 
 
I don&#039;t understand how can this article justify the killing of innocents by calling them collateral damage. He was not with a terrorist, he was just a bystander. What if you&#039;d been there in the restaurant? Would you call yourself collateral damage then? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Nor was he a member of Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninusla. Nor was he &quot;an inspiration,&quot; as his father styled himself, for those determined to draw American blood; nor had he gone &quot;operational,&quot; as American authorities said his father had, in drawing up plots against Americans and American interests. He was a boy who hadn&#039;t seen his father in two years, since his father had gone into hiding. He was a boy who knew his father was on an American kill list and who snuck out of his family&#039;s home in the early morning hours of September 4, 2011, to try to find him. He was a boy who was still searching for his father when his father was killed, and who, on the night he himself was killed, was saying goodbye to the second cousin with whom he&#039;d lived while on his search, and the friends he&#039;d made. He was a boy among boys, then; a boy among boys eating dinner by an open fire along the side of a road when an American drone came out of the sky and fired the missiles that killed them all.&quot; </p>
<p>I don&#039;t understand how can this article justify the killing of innocents by calling them collateral damage. He was not with a terrorist, he was just a bystander. What if you&#039;d been there in the restaurant? Would you call yourself collateral damage then? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4346077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4346077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s amazing what morally reprehensible positions people will stake out when they are consumed with bloodlust. By Mr. Greenfield&#039;s reasoning, had an apartment complex been blown up to kill a suspected terrorist inside, the lesson to draw would be, &quot;Don&#039;t live in the same building as a suspected Al Qaeda terrorist.&quot; Perhaps Mr. Greenfield would like to share with us who this &quot;Al Qaeda leader&quot; was and what evidence of his crimes exist. Of course, he has absolutely no idea. He&#039;s taking the government&#039;s word for it. Remember the day when conservatives used to make intellectual arguments about the dangers of centralizing power and the inefficiency and ineffectiveness of federal bureaucracies? All of a sudden when the military is involved, it becomes unimpeachable and beyond reproach. What a joke.    ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s amazing what morally reprehensible positions people will stake out when they are consumed with bloodlust. By Mr. Greenfield&#039;s reasoning, had an apartment complex been blown up to kill a suspected terrorist inside, the lesson to draw would be, &quot;Don&#039;t live in the same building as a suspected Al Qaeda terrorist.&quot; Perhaps Mr. Greenfield would like to share with us who this &quot;Al Qaeda leader&quot; was and what evidence of his crimes exist. Of course, he has absolutely no idea. He&#039;s taking the government&#039;s word for it. Remember the day when conservatives used to make intellectual arguments about the dangers of centralizing power and the inefficiency and ineffectiveness of federal bureaucracies? All of a sudden when the military is involved, it becomes unimpeachable and beyond reproach. What a joke.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hailey</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4344889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hailey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 06:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4344889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just about everything in this article reeks of ignorance. The issue here is what our rights are as American citizens according to the Constitution of the United States. If Obama can order an American citizen killed without any proof of wrongdoing and no ounce of due process, then he can do it to anyone. If the boy&#039;s name was Larry Johnson and his dad was a convicted serial killer, would it be okay to kill Larry for associating with a known killer? I highly doubt it. Regardless, this was a 16 year old boy who was born and raised in Colorado by family who was trying to distance him from his father. The gov&#039;t should not be able to go around killing people on American soil without proof. And it is absolutely absurd to make remarks that people opposing the drones are trying to say don&#039;t kill terrorists. The boy wasn&#039;t a terrorist nor was there evidence of him being a terrorist. The point is the government CANNOT simply order its own citizens killed in the absence of imminent threat. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just about everything in this article reeks of ignorance. The issue here is what our rights are as American citizens according to the Constitution of the United States. If Obama can order an American citizen killed without any proof of wrongdoing and no ounce of due process, then he can do it to anyone. If the boy&#039;s name was Larry Johnson and his dad was a convicted serial killer, would it be okay to kill Larry for associating with a known killer? I highly doubt it. Regardless, this was a 16 year old boy who was born and raised in Colorado by family who was trying to distance him from his father. The gov&#039;t should not be able to go around killing people on American soil without proof. And it is absolutely absurd to make remarks that people opposing the drones are trying to say don&#039;t kill terrorists. The boy wasn&#039;t a terrorist nor was there evidence of him being a terrorist. The point is the government CANNOT simply order its own citizens killed in the absence of imminent threat. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjrowland</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4320315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mjrowland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4320315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, Mr. Greenfield, you come off as one callous, ignorant, and immature SOB who obviously has no concept for human dignity and the due process of law.  You need to grow the eff up.    
  
&quot;Abdulrahman al-Awlaki was not an innocent American teenager cruelly assassinated by the United States. He was the son of an Al Qaeda leader who happened to be standing next to another Al Qaeda leader who was the actual target of an infidel drone.&quot; -- So I guess if you have a father who is accused of being a traitor, and if I catch you standing next to  it&#039;s perfectly okay for me to indiscriminately kill you both?    
  
&quot;Or perhaps we should only kill terrorists when there isn&#8217;t anyone around them for miles?&quot; -- You seem to imply here that if the military just goes into a heavily populated area and starts blasting away, it doesn&#039;t how many civilians die, as long as it kills at least one terrorist.  
  
One of the central issues at hand here is the due process of law.  The al-Awlakis were legal U.S. citizens at the times of their deaths.  Therefore their assassinations were illegal, period.  No one is above the law.  Not even the president.  If you don&#039;t give a crap that they were killed illegally, then you obviously don&#039;t give a crap about the U.S. Constitution.  Even monsters like Charles Manson have their day in court.  Even the Nazis got the Nuremberg tribunals.  Belief and adherence to the due process of law is a principle that must be defended.  That is why there is such a controversy over the al-Awlaki deaths.   But then again, perhaps people like you think that them Muslim A-Rabs ain&#039;t real Americans anyway, so it doesn&#039;t matter how many of them are killed, right? 
  
There&#039;s a lot more I can say on this, but you can just read my full op-ed here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://romuloadvocate.wordpress.com/2012/12/05/how-much-longer-will-the-u-s-survive-a-constitutional-democratic-republic/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://romuloadvocate.wordpress.com/2012/12/05/ho...&lt;/a&gt;      
  
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Mr. Greenfield, you come off as one callous, ignorant, and immature SOB who obviously has no concept for human dignity and the due process of law.  You need to grow the eff up.    </p>
<p>&quot;Abdulrahman al-Awlaki was not an innocent American teenager cruelly assassinated by the United States. He was the son of an Al Qaeda leader who happened to be standing next to another Al Qaeda leader who was the actual target of an infidel drone.&quot; &#8212; So I guess if you have a father who is accused of being a traitor, and if I catch you standing next to  it&#039;s perfectly okay for me to indiscriminately kill you both?    </p>
<p>&quot;Or perhaps we should only kill terrorists when there isn&rsquo;t anyone around them for miles?&quot; &#8212; You seem to imply here that if the military just goes into a heavily populated area and starts blasting away, it doesn&#039;t how many civilians die, as long as it kills at least one terrorist.  </p>
<p>One of the central issues at hand here is the due process of law.  The al-Awlakis were legal U.S. citizens at the times of their deaths.  Therefore their assassinations were illegal, period.  No one is above the law.  Not even the president.  If you don&#039;t give a crap that they were killed illegally, then you obviously don&#039;t give a crap about the U.S. Constitution.  Even monsters like Charles Manson have their day in court.  Even the Nazis got the Nuremberg tribunals.  Belief and adherence to the due process of law is a principle that must be defended.  That is why there is such a controversy over the al-Awlaki deaths.   But then again, perhaps people like you think that them Muslim A-Rabs ain&#039;t real Americans anyway, so it doesn&#039;t matter how many of them are killed, right? </p>
<p>There&#039;s a lot more I can say on this, but you can just read my full op-ed here: <a href="http://romuloadvocate.wordpress.com/2012/12/05/how-much-longer-will-the-u-s-survive-a-constitutional-democratic-republic/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://romuloadvocate.wordpress.com/2012/12/05/ho" rel="nofollow">http://romuloadvocate.wordpress.com/2012/12/05/ho</a>&#8230;      </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4257056</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laura]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4257056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity et al. have lost all sense of reason and are making asses of themselves.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity et al. have lost all sense of reason and are making asses of themselves.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ziggy Zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4252036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ziggy Zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 05:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4252036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al Qaeda decided they were terrorists and Awlaki was a proud member who got his 72 raisins courtesy of your Obamessiah. Besides, nobody who wages war against America has rights and your criticism of the Anointed one is blasphemous according to Eric Holder. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Qaeda decided they were terrorists and Awlaki was a proud member who got his 72 raisins courtesy of your Obamessiah. Besides, nobody who wages war against America has rights and your criticism of the Anointed one is blasphemous according to Eric Holder. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ziggy Zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4252018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ziggy Zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 05:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4252018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your projection is not very funny. Only 20% of Americans are deranged enough to self identify themselves as leftists and that figure has not changed for 50 years. The country is not divided between &quot;right-wingers&quot; (whatever those are supposed to be) and left-wingers. Marxists and other leftists all believe the use of violence is justified to achieve their social nirvana and they would get tingles down their legs if they could send drones after right-wing extremists-which according to them would be the other 80% of the population. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your projection is not very funny. Only 20% of Americans are deranged enough to self identify themselves as leftists and that figure has not changed for 50 years. The country is not divided between &quot;right-wingers&quot; (whatever those are supposed to be) and left-wingers. Marxists and other leftists all believe the use of violence is justified to achieve their social nirvana and they would get tingles down their legs if they could send drones after right-wing extremists-which according to them would be the other 80% of the population. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tagalog</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4249787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tagalog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 15:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4249787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wha-wha-wha-aah-what did you say?  I wasn&#039;t paying attention. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wha-wha-wha-aah-what did you say?  I wasn&#039;t paying attention. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4248312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4248312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, &quot;terrorists&quot; don&#039;t have rights, but how do you know who is a &quot;terrorist&quot;?  
 
Oh, I know, let&#039;s let the President decide, with no oversight! Great idea. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, &quot;terrorists&quot; don&#039;t have rights, but how do you know who is a &quot;terrorist&quot;?  </p>
<p>Oh, I know, let&#039;s let the President decide, with no oversight! Great idea. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4248301</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4248301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Baloney. Anyone can tell the difference between someone on a battlefield who is in between shots and someone who is riding in a car.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baloney. Anyone can tell the difference between someone on a battlefield who is in between shots and someone who is riding in a car.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4248293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4248293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Larry, 
 
As I recall, neither Hitler nor his staff were American citizens. That was a different situation.  
 
However, if there had been some judicial review of the question as to whether Hitler was a leader of the Nazis against whom we were at war, it would not have been the slightest bit difficult to produce evidence for it.  
 
Please take your own advice. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, </p>
<p>As I recall, neither Hitler nor his staff were American citizens. That was a different situation.  </p>
<p>However, if there had been some judicial review of the question as to whether Hitler was a leader of the Nazis against whom we were at war, it would not have been the slightest bit difficult to produce evidence for it.  </p>
<p>Please take your own advice. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4248263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4248263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very funny, ZZ. If you don&#039;t personally know any people on the left who are opposed to killing their own political adversaries, you need to broaden your social networks some. It isn&#039;t healthy to only associate with people who agree with you politically. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very funny, ZZ. If you don&#039;t personally know any people on the left who are opposed to killing their own political adversaries, you need to broaden your social networks some. It isn&#039;t healthy to only associate with people who agree with you politically. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4247436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4247436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Don&#039;t go away mad, just go away.&quot; 
 
Those are in fact my true feelings too. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Don&#039;t go away mad, just go away.&quot; </p>
<p>Those are in fact my true feelings too. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesus</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4246670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4246670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Abdulrahman al-Awlaki was not an innocent American teenager cruelly assassinated by the United States.&quot; - Have fun jerking off to that, creeps. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Abdulrahman al-Awlaki was not an innocent American teenager cruelly assassinated by the United States.&quot; &#8211; Have fun jerking off to that, creeps. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tagalog</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4245853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tagalog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4245853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps he was watching one of those shows when the drone blew him up, and died happy. As long as he&#039;s dead, I&#039;m OK with that.  &quot;Don&#039;t go away mad, just go away.&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps he was watching one of those shows when the drone blew him up, and died happy. As long as he&#039;s dead, I&#039;m OK with that.  &quot;Don&#039;t go away mad, just go away.&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tagalog</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4245803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tagalog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4245803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al-Awlaki is driving in a car when the drone strike hits him. Al-Awlaki is not engaging in plotting a strke on the U.S. Driving in a car is not an act of war. Was it OK to drone him? You bet.  
 
Padilla was on his way to meet with other terrorists when he was arrested at O&#039;Hare Airport in Chicago. Did he require due process and a trial? The Supreme Court said Yes. Why? Because, though an enemy combatant, he was a U.S. citizen on U.S. land? What difference does that make? Even though he was just a plane passenger at an airport when he was arrested, he was still in the process of making war on the United States. The Supreme Court was overprotective and its decision was an exercise in sophistry.  
 
If my daughter becomes a crystal meth addict, and she enters my home with the intent to burglarize it so as to rob me of my money and I -a policeman- shoot her while she&#039;s standing in the doorway of her old bedroom reminiscing, have I, acting as a policeman, deprived her of some due process right? if so, who cares? The ACLU? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al-Awlaki is driving in a car when the drone strike hits him. Al-Awlaki is not engaging in plotting a strke on the U.S. Driving in a car is not an act of war. Was it OK to drone him? You bet.  </p>
<p>Padilla was on his way to meet with other terrorists when he was arrested at O&#039;Hare Airport in Chicago. Did he require due process and a trial? The Supreme Court said Yes. Why? Because, though an enemy combatant, he was a U.S. citizen on U.S. land? What difference does that make? Even though he was just a plane passenger at an airport when he was arrested, he was still in the process of making war on the United States. The Supreme Court was overprotective and its decision was an exercise in sophistry.  </p>
<p>If my daughter becomes a crystal meth addict, and she enters my home with the intent to burglarize it so as to rob me of my money and I -a policeman- shoot her while she&#039;s standing in the doorway of her old bedroom reminiscing, have I, acting as a policeman, deprived her of some due process right? if so, who cares? The ACLU? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kasandra</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4245617</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kasandra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 14:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4245617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m going to make one last, and probably futile, try at this.  I do not mind killing American citizens who have joined with al-Qaeda.  I do not mind deliberately targeting such citizens when they are engaged in combat.  What I do mind is leaving it up to one person to make the decision to assassinate such people under vague standards such as those presented in the DOJ memorandum.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to make one last, and probably futile, try at this.  I do not mind killing American citizens who have joined with al-Qaeda.  I do not mind deliberately targeting such citizens when they are engaged in combat.  What I do mind is leaving it up to one person to make the decision to assassinate such people under vague standards such as those presented in the DOJ memorandum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tagalog</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/abdulrahman-al-awlaki-and-why-you-shouldnt-stand-next-to-an-al-qaeda-terrorist/comment-page-1/#comment-4245600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tagalog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 14:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=176621#comment-4245600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no frenzied push to disarm citizens. The entirely un-interfered-with frenzied rush to purchase firearms and ammunition for them is ample demonstration of the fact that the administration is not pushing to disarm anybody. The run on the market is evidence of an overblown fear of a hypothetical threat, not reality. I don&#039;t like the current gun attitude among our leaders any more than you do, I&#039;m just not about to panic or overreact at this point. I&#039;m more worried about my state legislature; there are 21 gun control measures before it in this session.  
 
Also, on the issue of gun control, we may see some heartening results when specific gun control bills begin to make their way through Congress. Newtown is receding and the gun &quot;crisis&quot; is passing. That&#039;s a positive turn of events for the Second Amendment. It&#039;s my hope that soon the supply of those semi-autos and the ammo for them, that have been the subject of so many lawmakers crying out and consequently have been in short supply, will start to be available again, as I have the bucks to buy one and am shopping around.  
 
I submit that ONE valuable lesson has been learned from this most recent gun flap: Wayne LaPierre is a TERRIBLE debater on gun rights. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no frenzied push to disarm citizens. The entirely un-interfered-with frenzied rush to purchase firearms and ammunition for them is ample demonstration of the fact that the administration is not pushing to disarm anybody. The run on the market is evidence of an overblown fear of a hypothetical threat, not reality. I don&#039;t like the current gun attitude among our leaders any more than you do, I&#039;m just not about to panic or overreact at this point. I&#039;m more worried about my state legislature; there are 21 gun control measures before it in this session.  </p>
<p>Also, on the issue of gun control, we may see some heartening results when specific gun control bills begin to make their way through Congress. Newtown is receding and the gun &quot;crisis&quot; is passing. That&#039;s a positive turn of events for the Second Amendment. It&#039;s my hope that soon the supply of those semi-autos and the ammo for them, that have been the subject of so many lawmakers crying out and consequently have been in short supply, will start to be available again, as I have the bucks to buy one and am shopping around.  </p>
<p>I submit that ONE valuable lesson has been learned from this most recent gun flap: Wayne LaPierre is a TERRIBLE debater on gun rights. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 725/776 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 17:27:53 by W3 Total Cache -->