<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Untrustworthy Administration Undermines Even Legitimate National Security Measures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/an-untrustworthy-administration-undermines-even-legitimate-national-security-measures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/an-untrustworthy-administration-undermines-even-legitimate-national-security-measures/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=an-untrustworthy-administration-undermines-even-legitimate-national-security-measures</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 04:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth Janelle</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/an-untrustworthy-administration-undermines-even-legitimate-national-security-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-5231726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beth Janelle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 08:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=192382#comment-5231726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are no longer a Constitutional Republic.  Why doesn&#039;t the POTUS stand in front of the people and tell the truth.  (stupid question I know) however, the grave nature he has put this nation in, so profound and diabolical, nothing short of his resignation is in order.  Meanwhile, hunker down for a category 5 disaster!  His actions are deliberate and his intent is clear.  Protect yourself and your family.  And may God Bless you all during these tumultuous times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are no longer a Constitutional Republic.  Why doesn&#8217;t the POTUS stand in front of the people and tell the truth.  (stupid question I know) however, the grave nature he has put this nation in, so profound and diabolical, nothing short of his resignation is in order.  Meanwhile, hunker down for a category 5 disaster!  His actions are deliberate and his intent is clear.  Protect yourself and your family.  And may God Bless you all during these tumultuous times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Shreve</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/an-untrustworthy-administration-undermines-even-legitimate-national-security-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-5231560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Shreve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=192382#comment-5231560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The untrustworthiness of the current administration is not the ONLY way they are undermining national security.  Funding and ARMING Jihadist, destroying the economy and creating an INSURMOUNTABLE nation debt play a major part as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The untrustworthiness of the current administration is not the ONLY way they are undermining national security.  Funding and ARMING Jihadist, destroying the economy and creating an INSURMOUNTABLE nation debt play a major part as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blair152</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/an-untrustworthy-administration-undermines-even-legitimate-national-security-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-5231362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blair152]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=192382#comment-5231362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IMPEACH OBAMA AND HOLDER NOW!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMPEACH OBAMA AND HOLDER NOW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/an-untrustworthy-administration-undermines-even-legitimate-national-security-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-5231358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=192382#comment-5231358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;A government that breaks faith in several areas will have mistrust spill into every area. Once you have abused a number of powers, then you will rightly be considered suspect in all of them.&quot;



The most significant factor to all of this is that this is the POTUS that wants to extent big government and its power without any apologies. He brags about these big government (socialist-communist) values and objectives. He wants the federal government huge and overwhelming while our military forces are neutralized. He wants to fold us in to the theoretical authority of the UN (with UN as ultimate global sovereign) and he dreams about leading this sharia-compliant UN soon after.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A government that breaks faith in several areas will have mistrust spill into every area. Once you have abused a number of powers, then you will rightly be considered suspect in all of them.&#8221;</p>
<p>The most significant factor to all of this is that this is the POTUS that wants to extent big government and its power without any apologies. He brags about these big government (socialist-communist) values and objectives. He wants the federal government huge and overwhelming while our military forces are neutralized. He wants to fold us in to the theoretical authority of the UN (with UN as ultimate global sovereign) and he dreams about leading this sharia-compliant UN soon after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabuquduriuzhur</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/an-untrustworthy-administration-undermines-even-legitimate-national-security-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-5231352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nabuquduriuzhur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=192382#comment-5231352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not all of us have bad memories. I get tired of one side being dishonest and then trying to blame everyone when they get caught.

This was my blog entry

&quot;We now actually have pundits with bad memories trying to claim that Bush
did this or did that. 

It&#039;s like the little kid who tries to mollify an adult by claiming
everyone does something.

When they DON&#039;T.

I wrote of the Democrat hypocrisy in wiretaps National Wave of
Foolishness, page 359:

-----------

&quot;Our culture, one that is now predominantly Liberal, is replete with
double standards. It would take more than one book to list them all.
Here are a tiny number of examples out of the Ceres-sized Liberal
pile of hypocrisy:

When President Clinton allegedly used various government agencies to
pursue illegal taps on phone calls of political enemies and also
allegedly to find those who didn&#039;t agree with his policies and
allegedly used the government to place cookies and other illegal
software on ISPs and personal computers— this was apparently OK
with people on the Left as they didn&#039;t complain about it. 

The liberal media was fine with it— or they would have complained.
However, when President G.W. Bush signed the Patriot Act— an Act
that required a warrant to start tapping the phones of terror suspects— it was somehow horrible and awful to the Left that the government was tapping the
phones of known terrorists in Iraq who were calling terror suspects
in this country. 

The media screamed, Democrats complained and the Democrat Congress fought it. The sheer volume of dishonest &quot;complaints&quot; I heard from
liberals and read in the news services could fill lake basins with
bad-smelling horse-derived plant food. 

What is wrong with requiring a judge to issue a warrant before a wiretap??
It is in the 4th Amendment, isn&#039;t it? (It&#039;s like the Left took what Clinton
was allegedly doing and transferred it to Bush.) Matthew 23:13-36
applies to the actions of Democrats of the last 20 years, doesn&#039;t it?

Hypocrisy. It&#039;s either OK to illegally wiretap/surveille or it&#039;s not. Party
shouldn&#039;t enter into it, should it? The Constitution should be the
law, should it not?&quot;

------------------

Now we have a judge illegally issuing orders for MILLIIONS of
customers&#039; information. Not quite the same thing as a court order for
a specific person calling a known terrorist in Iraq as the Bush
wiretaps were? 

It&#039;s not permitted by the Patriot Act, either. How do you get from a court
order required for a wiretap for one person, to millions?  There&#039;s nothing in the Constitution to allow such an iniquity.

The Fourth Amendment requires a warrant. It&#039;s always been understood that
a person or business entity can have a warrant written against them.

Not the population at large.

But because it makes the Democrats feel better to try to claim everyone
is a crook, as usual, they try to shift blame.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all of us have bad memories. I get tired of one side being dishonest and then trying to blame everyone when they get caught.</p>
<p>This was my blog entry</p>
<p>&#8220;We now actually have pundits with bad memories trying to claim that Bush<br />
did this or did that. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s like the little kid who tries to mollify an adult by claiming<br />
everyone does something.</p>
<p>When they DON&#8217;T.</p>
<p>I wrote of the Democrat hypocrisy in wiretaps National Wave of<br />
Foolishness, page 359:</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>&#8220;Our culture, one that is now predominantly Liberal, is replete with<br />
double standards. It would take more than one book to list them all.<br />
Here are a tiny number of examples out of the Ceres-sized Liberal<br />
pile of hypocrisy:</p>
<p>When President Clinton allegedly used various government agencies to<br />
pursue illegal taps on phone calls of political enemies and also<br />
allegedly to find those who didn&#8217;t agree with his policies and<br />
allegedly used the government to place cookies and other illegal<br />
software on ISPs and personal computers— this was apparently OK<br />
with people on the Left as they didn&#8217;t complain about it. </p>
<p>The liberal media was fine with it— or they would have complained.<br />
However, when President G.W. Bush signed the Patriot Act— an Act<br />
that required a warrant to start tapping the phones of terror suspects— it was somehow horrible and awful to the Left that the government was tapping the<br />
phones of known terrorists in Iraq who were calling terror suspects<br />
in this country. </p>
<p>The media screamed, Democrats complained and the Democrat Congress fought it. The sheer volume of dishonest &#8220;complaints&#8221; I heard from<br />
liberals and read in the news services could fill lake basins with<br />
bad-smelling horse-derived plant food. </p>
<p>What is wrong with requiring a judge to issue a warrant before a wiretap??<br />
It is in the 4th Amendment, isn&#8217;t it? (It&#8217;s like the Left took what Clinton<br />
was allegedly doing and transferred it to Bush.) Matthew 23:13-36<br />
applies to the actions of Democrats of the last 20 years, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Hypocrisy. It&#8217;s either OK to illegally wiretap/surveille or it&#8217;s not. Party<br />
shouldn&#8217;t enter into it, should it? The Constitution should be the<br />
law, should it not?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Now we have a judge illegally issuing orders for MILLIIONS of<br />
customers&#8217; information. Not quite the same thing as a court order for<br />
a specific person calling a known terrorist in Iraq as the Bush<br />
wiretaps were? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not permitted by the Patriot Act, either. How do you get from a court<br />
order required for a wiretap for one person, to millions?  There&#8217;s nothing in the Constitution to allow such an iniquity.</p>
<p>The Fourth Amendment requires a warrant. It&#8217;s always been understood that<br />
a person or business entity can have a warrant written against them.</p>
<p>Not the population at large.</p>
<p>But because it makes the Democrats feel better to try to claim everyone<br />
is a crook, as usual, they try to shift blame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WHITE CLOUD</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/an-untrustworthy-administration-undermines-even-legitimate-national-security-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-5231348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WHITE CLOUD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=192382#comment-5231348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GET THE FAKE OUT OFOFFICE GET IT OUT NOW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GET THE FAKE OUT OFOFFICE GET IT OUT NOW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/an-untrustworthy-administration-undermines-even-legitimate-national-security-measures/comment-page-1/#comment-5231323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=192382#comment-5231323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, I get it.


The problem isn&#039;t the sweeping unjustifiable surveillance of the American people, it&#039;s that the Obama administration is making the NSA look bad by doing it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I get it.</p>
<p>The problem isn&#8217;t the sweeping unjustifiable surveillance of the American people, it&#8217;s that the Obama administration is making the NSA look bad by doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 427/437 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 23:34:39 by W3 Total Cache -->