Association of Gays, Pedophiles and Transsexuals Haunts German Left

Proteste gegen Preisverleihung an Cohn-Bendit

The official narrative is that homosexuality and transsexuals are in a whole other category than pedophiles. Unfortunately someone forgot to pass that message along to the Association of Gays, Pedophiles and Transsexuals of the Green Party in Germany.

The 1986 image was printed in the newsletter of the Green Party’s national working group on “Gays, Pederasts and Transsexuals,” abbreviated as “BAG SchwuP.” It wasn’t just sent to a few scattered party members, but was addressed to Green Party members of the German parliament, as well as the party’s headquarters in Bonn.

Documents like this have become a problem for the Greens today. Some 33 years after the party was founded, it is now being haunted by a chapter in its history that many would have preferred to forget. No political group in Germany promoted the interests of men with pedophile tendencies as staunchly as the environmental party. For a period of time in the mid-1980s, it practically served as the parliamentary arm of the pedophile movement.

A look at its archives reveals numerous traces of the pedophiles’ flirtation with the Green Party. They appear in motions, party resolutions, memos and even reports by the party treasurer. That is because at times the party not only supported its now forgotten fellow campaigners politically, but also more tangibly, in the form of financial support.

When the Green Party was founded in 1980, pedophiles were part of the movement from the start — not at the center of its activities, but always hovering along the periphery. At the first party convention in the southwestern German city of Karlsruhe, pacifists, feminists and opponents of nuclear energy were joined by the so-called “Urban Indians,” who advocated the “legalization of all affectionate sexual relations between adults and children.” From then on, pedophiles, noisy and wearing colorful body paint, were often a visible part of Green Party gatherings.

The pedophile movement was, for obvious reasons, nearly indistinguishable from the gay rights movements in tactics and appearance.

Today, when party members look at family photos from their early history during anniversary celebrations, they are quick to overlook the proponents of sex with children. No one asks about these strange figures anymore, the ones who turned up at every party convention, claiming that pedophilia was a “human right.” Who exactly were they?

No one talks about the Gulags either. The first rule of the left is ask no difficult questions.

It’s embarrassing for the Greens. No other party depends as heavily on the claim of being on the right side of morality. The Greens also played a leading role from the start — as prosecutors — in the debate over abuse within the Catholic Church, emphatically demanding answers to allegations of sexual abuse of children. And, of course, a Green Party parliamentarian, Antje Vollmer, was also a member of the Bundestag’s round table to address the abuses that took place in mainly church-run children’s homes in the 1950s and 1960s.

Fox meet henhouse.

In their initial approach to the issue, Green Party leaders have agreed that they are dealing with regrettable but isolated cases. “Protecting children from sexual abuse was and remains a central concern,” says party co-chairman Cem Özdemir. “It is unacceptable that some are now trying to reinterpret the positions of individual groups in the past as a supposedly lax position of the Greens toward the sexual abuse of children.”

If you allow proponents of raping child a place at your conventions and give them money, that is anything but isolated. Just as having proponents of genocide would make that anything but isolated.

“In terms of national politics, the Greens were the only hope for pedophiles,” says Kurt Hartmann, a member of BAG SchwuP in the 1980s who now heads an association that promotes pedophile literature. “They were the only party that put their necks on the line for sexual minorities in the long term.”

In America, it will be the Democrats.

The pedophiles’ core issue was to bring down Section 176 of the German Criminal Code, which criminalizes sexual acts with children. With the Greens they found for the first time a political force that was willing to entertain this debate. Indeed, in March 1980, the Greens held their second national convention in the southwestern city of Saarbrücken, where they approved a program that opposed “discrimination against sexual outsiders.” The convention established a “pedo-commission” to specifically address the interests of pedophiles.

You can see this happening under political correctness too.

In 1983, an ad for the Greens ran in the gay newspaper Torso. It featured a drawing of the party’s trademark sunflower and the text: “Sections 174 and 176 should be amended to read that only the application or threat of violence, or the abuse of a dependent relationship in connection with sexual acts should be criminalized!” In plain terms, this meant: Adults could have sex with children, as long as they weren’t their own and they weren’t threatened with violence. Such positions were socially acceptable among the Greens, a fact that today’s party members are only too eager to forget.

The pedophiles celebrated their greatest success in March 1985 at the Greens’ state manifesto conference in Lüdenscheid, in the western state of North Rhine-Westphalia. There, the party approved a position paper that sought to generally allow “non-violent sexuality” between adults and children, though the resolution was quickly dropped because of public outrage. Nevertheless, BAG SchwuP did not view this as a defeat because it had finally opened the door to public discussion of the pedophiles’ agenda.

“The subject went from being taboo to part of the political consciousness,” reads a SchwuP newsletter from the period. “The fact that, for the first time, the protagonists are becoming the targets of HATE and disgust, scorn and derision, all of this is good and not bad. These emotions always arise at the beginning of a truly deep debate.”

Again, same language and tactics as gay rights. And it appeared in a gay rights paper.

  • AdinaK

    Nazi socialism is rife with gays and pedophiles and this is a fact. It is understandable that those who seek to "transform" traditional society, and have an utter hated for Judeo-Christian constructs, would want to destroy its foundations. They find it unbearable to be "constrained/restrained" by western civilized paradigms.

    Does anyone wonder why so many within Obama Inc are also very much into the anything goes culture, as they subvert the roots of America into twisted knots? Don't. This does not mean that every non-traditional person is the same. Not at all. But a preponderance are of a similar bent.

    Most tellingly, the Radical-in-Chief is the poster man-child of the above, as he wrecks havoc all over America and beyond –

    Adina Kutnicki, Israel

  • AdinaK

    The man-child POTUS is a poster exhibit for the radical left. So just substitute the German left with Obama Inc and surrogates, and then the following becomes easier to internalize –

    Tearing traditional ethos from its roots is always the left's goal, whether in Germany, America or beyond.

    Adina Kutnicki, Israel

  • Softly Bob

    The LGBT movement, allied with the Greens will form an open alliance with the Pedos and I guess (if the current Leftist trend isn't halted) will eventually get some sort of pedophilia legalised.
    This freak circus of an alliance will then try everything they can to push more Leftist legislation in our faces, and I think that by sheer numbers they will be a force to be reckoned with.
    It will end badly for them when the Islamic wolf turns around and devours them. Except for the Pedos of course, who will be the only one of these freak groups who will actually be approved of by the Muslims.

  • Jim

    Killing live babies,Molesting Children

    Now we see the true face of the Progressives.

    Problem for the progressive.
    Scientists have found that "epigenetics factors" cause Homosexuality and can be detected in the fetus.
    Can we eliminate homosexuality by detection and abortion.? Yes

    Would homosexuals like to out law abortion, so homosexuality can be eliminated
    Would women have to lose their right to chose so that homosexuality can propagate it's self.

    Liberals get furious when you ask them the question.

    They answer the riddle with an angry " That's a ridiculous question.

    That is they are stumped.

    • Mary Sue

      their god is Chemosh/Molech

  • UCSPanther

    The German Left should know, that one is judged by the company they keep.

    Hang out with pederasts, and people will think you either are one, or you defend them.

  • buddy

    This is an interesting issue. And as always it comes down to fundamentals. If you don't respect your children, they never become proper adults. They never become men.