Burka Bandits Rob Pregnant Woman in Seattle

burka

Apparently it’s a bad idea to let masked people roam the streets. This is why most cities with high crime rates had laws about wearing masks in public. But Muslim Islamization groups arranged to waive those laws on the grounds of religious freedom.

Now Muslim and non-Muslim criminals are using the Burka to carry out crimes.

SEATTLE – A woman who was nine months pregnant was attacked and rob by two teenagers wearing burqas last Tuesday in North Seattle. Now, police are asking for help finding the attackers.

According to police, the pregnant woman was walking on Nov. 5 near the intersection of Pinehurst Way NE and NE 113th Street when two female teens dressed in all black and wearing burqas approached the woman and asked if they could use her cell phone.

The expectant mother said no, and that she would place the call for them. That’s when the girls, between the ages of 13 and 15, knocked the woman to the ground and tried to rob her before fleeing.

It is unclear if the victim suffered any injuries or needed any medical attention. Police called to the scene and police weren’t able to locate the suspects.

Well of course not. They were wearing masks. Legally. All they had to do was take off their Burkas, fold them up into a backpack and they were good to go.

  • Veracious_one

    Burkas should be outlawed…law violators would be easy to spot….

  • A Z

    A crime happened and as usually I looked at the street map in google (pick your own map service). Take a look the pedestrian view and its location to various business etc.

    Pinehurst Way NE and NE 113th Street is not a built up area. It is open with good line of sight in all directions.

    It is not an alley.

    It should be safe!

    This is what Democrat/Labour/Social Democrat/leftists immigration and multicultural policies give us.

    A broad day light attack on the most helpless among us is feasible and encouraged.

    Vote Democrat and you vote for de_th.

    You might pull the trigger but you will be an accomplice.

  • A Z

    And the Idriss Mosque is 2 blocks south and 3 blocks east of the crime scene.

  • Biff Henderson

    Q: Why is a niqab like a bag of Cracker Jack?

    A: Because there’s a surprise in every bag.

  • Notalibfool

    So is the liberal elite going to pass this off as entrapment?
    Will they ramble on and on about Islamophobia? Or will it simply be swept under the rug and forgotten?

    Expect this kind of crime to become commonplace in Seattle-dominated leftist Washington state.

  • WhiteRob

    Hey man, I never have or will trust anyone dressed like a ninja

  • EamonnDublin

    Maybe non-Muslims should stage a major peaceful demonstration, with everybody wearing a balaclava – and ideally a black plastic bag or other such covering to hide all means of identity. Possibly, in addition, individuals who are concerned about the burka/niqab problem should don a balaclava when they see a policeman nearby. We would then see how long this “rights” thing lasts. When the police stop the balaclava wearer (as they would, immediately) we could challenge this by claiming that we were victims of unequal treatment – our “offence” being that we are not Muslims! Oh what a tangled web we weave! Western civilization is committing SUICIDE!! Let us all stand up and protect the rights of our grand-daughters. If we don’t they will be growing up into a servile, backward, uneducated excuse for a society. What do you think they will think of us, for our apathy – leaving them to face the consequences because we couldn’t be bothered? Éamonn, Dublin, Ireland

  • Tom Fjord

    This is the funniest thing I’ve ever read. Do people actually believe this story? Who was the victim? How did she know the suspects were “between the ages of 13 and 15″ if they were covered head to toe? They knocked her down and “tried to rob her”? Please. Plus, I live near an area with a huge Muslim population (International Boulevard North of the airport) and have never even once seen a person wearing a complete (with niquab) burqa. And the women who are somewhat covered are NEVER aggressive in any way. I’m sorry, but this story is either fake or has been twisted to promote negativity towards Muslims.
    Additionally, what’s with all the “liberal” comments? this story has nothing to do with liberalism whatsoever. My mother drops “liberal” all the time when she feels like blaming a group for something that makes her uncomfortable but doesn’t want to bother becoming educated about it, (I think the term is “scapegoat”) and it drives me up the wall. Anything she doesn’t like automatically = liberal. So ignorant. “Those damn liberals!!!” Surely you people know that not everything is black/white, liberal/conservative, democrat/republican, Christian/Muslim.
    People that think this way are either lazy, or simply not very smart. Shame. I expect Americans to be a step above this nonsense. Please try harder.

    • defcon 4

      Move to Dearbornistan foolio.

    • Notalibfool

      It has everything to do with liberalism because the liberals made such situations possible. Maybe you should listen to your mother and stop assuming that she is ignorant.

      By the way I live near Olympia, and I have seen several women wearing the full burqa.

      • Tom Fjord

        “The liberals”? I’m sorry – once again, who exactly are these mystery people, and what exactly did they do to cause teens to put on disguises and knock people over to try to steal their stuff? I seriously would like to know. I think any bad person could/would do something like this if they really wanted to.

        • Notalibfool

          Please go back and re-read the responses Judahlevi and objectivefactsmatter.

          The mysterious liberals are those fine folks who insist on inviting in people hostile to our nation and its traditions.

          The liberals are people who imply that those who disagree lack intellect, like you did in your post above.

          I could go on and on, but why bother.

          • Notalibfool

            Oops, I meant to say re-read their responses to your post.

        • ziggy zoggy

          You really are a stupid turd muncher, aren’t you?

    • Judahlevi

      This comment by a liberal is a classic insight into the mindset of such people.

      First, he denies reality because it does not fit his worldview even though two separate news organizations reported it (denial of reality).

      Second, he engages in conspiracy theory to try to explain why the story was written by inferring that it was done to “promote negativity towards Muslims.” Yes, I am sure this pregnant victim is part of the conspiracy. His insensitivity toward the victim is because she was attacked by the wrong group. If she was attacked by Christians, he would have been pouring his heart out.

      Third, he thinks his mother and anyone who doesn’t agree with him are not “educated.” Insulting a person’s intelligence is de rigueur for liberals.

      Fourth, he expects “Americans” to agree with him, and if not, they are lazy, or “simply not very smart.” Of course if you agree with him you are brilliant (because he is brilliant in his own mind).

      And he ends it all with an admonishment to “try harder” since none of us are meeting HIS standards (a control freak).

      This about sums is up for most liberals.

      • tickletik

        That was awesome

      • defcon 4

        No wonder lieberals and islam0fascists get along so well. It’s truth by decree, rather than truth by reasoned debate.

      • Tom Fjord

        Thanks for helping me make my point: I’m automatically labeled “liberal” because you disagree with me. What did I say that could possibly be considered liberal?
        First, I’m not denying reality – I’m asking for facts. Who was the victim? How was she able to approximate the ages of the perps if they were totally covered? Why weren’t they able to steal anything (her phone?) if they knocked her down? I’m sorry, but none of this rings true. At the very least, it’s horrible journalism. At most – it’s completely fake.
        Second, I suggested no conspiracy. However, I am suggesting hysteria. Anyone could use a burqa as a disguise, just as anyone could use a nun’s habit as a disguise. The perp’s possible religion isn’t relevant – but the article and the comments here are all anti-Muslim. Why?
        Third, I never said that anyone who disagrees with me is not educated. I simply said that my mother uses “liberal” when she chooses to not become educated about a subject. And I’m not insulting anyone’s intelligence. However, choosing not to think is an un-intelligent choice.
        Fourth, it is an American standard to be democratic: gather the facts, analyze those facts, and make decisions based on the knowledge gained. Anything less that that is lazy and un-American – hence “try harder”.
        No, I do not think I’m brilliant. But I’m concerned when I read a very poor article full of propaganda, and instead of questioning the validity, people are cheering it on. What’s next? Pitchforks and torches?
        And please – enlighten me – What is liberal about anything I’ve said?

        • objectivefactsmatter

          “Anyone could use a burqa as a disguise, just as anyone could use a nun’s habit as a disguise.”

          Correct.

          “The perp’s possible religion isn’t relevant – but the article and the comments here are all anti-Muslim. Why?”

          Because we’re asked to tolerate people wearing masks when they’d otherwise be outlawed. Because of Muslim lobby groups that also happen to front for the Muslim Brotherhood.

          • Tom Fjord

            I appreciate this. Thank you.
            A couple of questions:
            1.) Were the assailants mentioned in the article wearing the niqab (eye-slit face mask) or just the burqua? The article just says “burqua” which leaves the entire face exposed, and is not a mask.
            2.) Has there ever been an initiative in Seattle to outlaw face masks that has been successfully lobbied against by Muslim groups?
            Like I mentioned previously, I’ve never seen anyone in Seattle wearing the full eye-slit burqua it. I’m not saying that they don’t exist here, but in all the international areas I frequent – I’ve never viewed it.
            From a crime perspective, I would like to know exactly what these assailants were wearing, because it is important to be able to identify criminals. Like I mentioned before: this article is really bad.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            It’s preliminary, best taken as an illustration until we find out more. It’s worth reporting because of the potential to spin the facts later, or perhaps even bury it.

          • Tom Fjord

            That makes sense. I appreciate you being objective, and answering my questions rather than screaming “liberal!!!” like other people here.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “It sounds like this is more about anti-mask practicality, rather than Islamophobia – which is exactly what I wanted to find out, and what the article failed to communicate.”

            Often the articles here are knowingly “preaching to the choir.” There’s a bias towards entertainment rather than worry about being politically correct.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “I appreciate you being objective, and answering my questions rather than screaming “liberal!!!” ”

            They are implying that you are a dupe of liberal propaganda even if you don’t perceive yourself as “liberal.”

            It’s not a very good label without understanding context so I can understand your confusion. I try to use “leftist” when I want to convey such ideas, and I try to remember to specify dupery if that’s what I want to suggest.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “2.) Has there ever been an initiative in Seattle to outlaw face masks that has been successfully lobbied against by Muslim groups?”

            Seattle? Perhaps not. Seattle is a bit of a bubble. But the trend nationwide and throughout the West is to tolerate exceptions for religious reasons…and CAIR is constantly pushing hard for “multicultural” standards of compromise which means that the host get’s no consideration for its own laws and values.

            Wearing a cross or other expression of religious faith doesn’t cause anyone any harm. Tolerating masks obviously creates additional risk to the public. It doesn’t matter at all what the religious motives are. If a nun’s habit is seen as facilitating crime it should be limited or banned. It’s just that simple. The same goes for any other costume regardless of justification.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Do you suppose the assailants were Christian or White? Your comment is really bad, you piece of $hit. Fuck you up your @ss.

        • Judahlevi

          First Comment:
          “This is the funniest thing I’ve ever read. Do people actually believe this story?”

          Second Comment:
          “First, I’m not denying reality – I’m asking for facts.”

          That is a odd way to ask for facts. BTW, I don’t think a pregnant woman being attacked and knocked to the ground is “funny.”

          You are denying reality – again. And for the record, you were not “automatically” labeled a liberal, you proved yourself to be one by your own comments.

          You can write a thousand pages denying what you are, but quantity does not equal veracity. Don’t worry, we see this all of the time, but unless you go through an epiphany like David Horowitz, you will be blind to it.

        • Rocky Mountain

          Can’t remember the last time some nuns robbed somebody unless it was Whoopi Goldberg in that terrible movie she made.

        • ziggy zoggy

          You’re recognized as a lefty because you tow the line. How are the perps more credible than the Vic? Hmm? Well?

          Islamopithecines spread their violent filth wherever they crawl. Why are you defending them, you contemptible piece of filth? Seriously. You are beneath contempt.

          • hiernonymous

            It’s “toe the line,” unless you’re discussing a Coast Guard rescue.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            Tow the line is an (I assume) accidental deviation that some times makes sense though.

            Toe the line implies passive obedience, tow the line implies something more active.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      The “liberal” cook burned my toast?

      You’re not too bright. That’s why you don’t see the connections. The point of the article is that multiculturalism is “liberal” but often in reality contrary to liberty.

      • Tom Fjord

        So, I came back to this after a month to see what people were saying, and to maybe have an interesting conversation with someone in which both parties come away having learned something new. I tried to be polite. I tried to bring something different to the discussion. However, I come back to the most disgusting comments I’ve ever seen, and have been labeled “not too bright” for basically defending the American Constitution.
        No, I see the connections and I understand the propaganda of this article. I do not like Islam and I think burqas are super creepy. However, instead of being xenophobes, we need to come up with a solution that respects the constitutional rights of all Americasn – even the ones that creep us out. However, the discussion didn’t even come to that before I was attacked for not being one of the sheep commenting on this article. I was just trying to present a different point of view to help break through all this tunnel vision.
        What a bunch of horrible people. I’m done with you. Good luck with your cause.

        • objectivefactsmatter

          “However, I come back to the most disgusting comments I’ve ever seen, and have been labeled “not too bright” for basically defending the American Constitution.”

          Ah, you’re motives are pure. We should respect you for that.

          “No, I see the connections and I understand the propaganda of this article. I do not like Islam and I think burqas are super creepy. However, instead of being xenophobes, we need to come up with a solution that respects the constitutional rights of all Americasn – even the ones that creep us out.”

          That’s true. The question is how effectively you are contributing. Calling people xenophobes might be the wrong move given that this is a comments section where people might be adding a bit of sarcasm or drama in order to convey their point without getting bored. If you want to be taken seriously, it’s on you to show that.

          Reading your comment again, it seems that in your world you’re the only one that gets to react emotionally to what you see and you expect others to conform to you rather than to the group you recently visited. You want the “sheep” to follow you rather than follow anything you object to, even when your objections might be premature.

          “I was just trying to present a different point of view to help break through all this tunnel vision.”

          It used to be that people understood it was incumbent upon the new arrivals to look around and show respect for the established participants and conversations given that many of us have had these conversations for months or years. It’s natural that people will hone their comments according to the local crowd. That’s not being sheep, that’s human nature.

          You want to parachute in and immediately judge in order to feel superior without actually trying to find out truly what’s going on.

          If you want respect you must show it first. Especially on the web. People that learned to browse on iPads often miss out on the essentials and end up being…sheep by following their pre-Internet indoctrination. But you feel independent because you troll people that you disagree with.

          Amazing and impressive stuff.

          “What a bunch of horrible people. I’m done with you. Good luck with your cause.”

          Join the jihad and chop off our heads. That will improve the world lots. Then kill those hated sheep and eat them on designated holidays. Who knows, maybe you’ll love Islam once you go full jihadi.

          Or maybe lighten up and see if you learn anything.

    • roccolore

      Liberals support the Sharia Law that would give special privileges to women wearing full-body garbage bags.

      • Notalibfool

        …meanwhile they complain nonstop about Christianity and Judaism.

        • roccolore

          I find it funny when the same liberals who advocate in support of Sharia would never move to a country where it is practiced. Those same people would never wear one of those full-body garbage bags.

          • Notalibfool

            Agreed! If they think Sharia is so wonderful perhaps they should move to Iran or Saudi Arabia.

    • Rocky Mountain

      The first problem is that you live near an area with a huge Muslim population.

    • ziggy zoggy

      You are a lying, self loathing sack of $hit. Islamopithecines are the most violent animals on the planet and wherever you find a burka in the West you find duplicity and savagery. And the only “people” more hateful than islamopithecines are lefties.

      Go fuck yourself, you scumbag.

  • roccolore

    Another crime approved by the terror front CAIR.

  • worldwatchman

    Is open season yet? I hope there’s no bag limit. You can thank the muslim in charge for allowing so many of them in our country. What pieces of crap they are.

  • ziggy zoggy

    “North Seattle.” The real name is The Central District.

    Take a guess which racial “minority” lives there.