<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Obama Be Stopped?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=can-obama-be-stopped</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 22:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 03:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I think the Democrats really are trying to blame the Republicans when it is really their fault. They are unwilling to admit culpability.&quot; 
 
That&#039;s one of the &quot;iron laws&quot; of the left: Blame the right for everything. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;I think the Democrats really are trying to blame the Republicans when it is really their fault. They are unwilling to admit culpability.&quot; </p>
<p>That&#039;s one of the &quot;iron laws&quot; of the left: Blame the right for everything. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 03:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Wrong again, Mary Sue.&quot; 
 
 
I can&#039;t wait for you to accuse others of repeating empty arguments...again. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Wrong again, Mary Sue.&quot; </p>
<p>I can&#039;t wait for you to accuse others of repeating empty arguments&#8230;again. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 03:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Theoretically, there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income,&#8221; Mr. Obama wrote, &#8220;so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.&#8221; 
 
And also in theory, since you didn&#039;t build that, you already get your &quot;commensurate&quot; value. We can tax you up to 100% of your income. That ought to work great. It&#039;s called &quot;communism.&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&ldquo;Theoretically, there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income,&rdquo; Mr. Obama wrote, &ldquo;so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.&rdquo; </p>
<p>And also in theory, since you didn&#039;t build that, you already get your &quot;commensurate&quot; value. We can tax you up to 100% of your income. That ought to work great. It&#039;s called &quot;communism.&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 02:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Yep, it&#039;s a shocking admission that the current GOP does not take governance seriously.&quot;  
  
Virtually all politicians are too obsessed with power which means they are subject to the requirements of success in this environment where leftists control all of the cultural choke points. However, Republicans rely on ideologies that are based on reality rather than fantasy. That alone means you must be insane to support the Democratic Party over the Republicans.  
  
The Republicans sell out too often but Democrats are delusional psychotics with no chance of success. What little successes they seem to enjoy are due to the too few battles put up by Republicans with integrity.  
  
&quot;Not smarter, but more honest.&quot;  
  
Are you as smart as the CPAs and economists that I know? Because you&#039;d have to be to say that you&#039;re more honest than people who contradict you. You must consider yourself a genius and for no reason I can discern. You&#039;re honest to your own heart and that&#039;s all that matters. You learned that from Hollywood, domain of the left.  
 
&quot;Sure, idiot, if that helps.&quot;  
  
It&#039;s not helpful at all. I thought you were the voice or reason, wisdom and honesty so we need some answers from you. Nice bluff though. I&#039;m sure all the leftists are cheering you on, if that helps your spirits.  
  
&quot;Yes, the magic of Trickle Down economics, which we&#039;ve been doing for 30+ years. It&#039;s &quot;we can have everything!&quot; nonsense.&quot;  
  
Your statement makes no sense. &quot;Trickle down&quot; has nothing to do with &quot;having it all.&quot;  
  
&quot;But you don&#039;t know where he&#039;d cut spending, because he refused to answer that question.&quot;  
  
I don&#039;t think he wanted to cut spending until after the economy recovered if at all. He promised he had a more successful business record that 0&#039;Bama and understood the dynamics of the economy. He understood trickle down theory and that growing the economy was far more effective at raising revenue.  
  
I never claimed he was a savior, but he was right in what he said. He deserved a chance to try while 0&#039;Bama already proved what a failure he would be. Why would Romney make up stories about cuts when he wasn&#039;t even planning any yet? His narrative was that economic growth must come first. You just don&#039;t understand.  
  
That&#039;s why revamping education is the only long term fix. Too many ignorant citizens. Thanks for helping me prove this point. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Yep, it&#039;s a shocking admission that the current GOP does not take governance seriously.&quot;  </p>
<p>Virtually all politicians are too obsessed with power which means they are subject to the requirements of success in this environment where leftists control all of the cultural choke points. However, Republicans rely on ideologies that are based on reality rather than fantasy. That alone means you must be insane to support the Democratic Party over the Republicans.  </p>
<p>The Republicans sell out too often but Democrats are delusional psychotics with no chance of success. What little successes they seem to enjoy are due to the too few battles put up by Republicans with integrity.  </p>
<p>&quot;Not smarter, but more honest.&quot;  </p>
<p>Are you as smart as the CPAs and economists that I know? Because you&#039;d have to be to say that you&#039;re more honest than people who contradict you. You must consider yourself a genius and for no reason I can discern. You&#039;re honest to your own heart and that&#039;s all that matters. You learned that from Hollywood, domain of the left.  </p>
<p>&quot;Sure, idiot, if that helps.&quot;  </p>
<p>It&#039;s not helpful at all. I thought you were the voice or reason, wisdom and honesty so we need some answers from you. Nice bluff though. I&#039;m sure all the leftists are cheering you on, if that helps your spirits.  </p>
<p>&quot;Yes, the magic of Trickle Down economics, which we&#039;ve been doing for 30+ years. It&#039;s &quot;we can have everything!&quot; nonsense.&quot;  </p>
<p>Your statement makes no sense. &quot;Trickle down&quot; has nothing to do with &quot;having it all.&quot;  </p>
<p>&quot;But you don&#039;t know where he&#039;d cut spending, because he refused to answer that question.&quot;  </p>
<p>I don&#039;t think he wanted to cut spending until after the economy recovered if at all. He promised he had a more successful business record that 0&#039;Bama and understood the dynamics of the economy. He understood trickle down theory and that growing the economy was far more effective at raising revenue.  </p>
<p>I never claimed he was a savior, but he was right in what he said. He deserved a chance to try while 0&#039;Bama already proved what a failure he would be. Why would Romney make up stories about cuts when he wasn&#039;t even planning any yet? His narrative was that economic growth must come first. You just don&#039;t understand.  </p>
<p>That&#039;s why revamping education is the only long term fix. Too many ignorant citizens. Thanks for helping me prove this point. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 02:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;No, it&#039;s the theory that super low tax rates spurs growth and raises all boats&quot; 
 
You&#039;re not 100% wrong so I&#039;ll let it go for now. 
 
&quot;while producing enough revenue to cover the cost of running the government&quot; 
 
Nope. It doesn&#039;t assume you can spend indefinitely. The point is that taxes have dynamic effects and that if you choke off cash flow with taxes, that money is in the hands of the government and is therefore being less productive rather than flowing through the private sector (where it is always more productive). The reason people refer to these theories as &quot;trickle down&quot; is the recognition that successful people and businesses hire others in the lower income realms and that it benefits everyone even when &quot;the rich&quot; are not taxed according to superficial notions of &quot;fairness&quot; according to the views of unsuccessful people. 
 
&quot;It&#039;s wrong.&quot; 
 
Wow, straw is flying all over the place. We&#039;re so impressed. 
 
&quot;We&#039;ve been doing that for 30+ years.&quot; 
 
It works when we do it. Leftists always interfere though and want &quot;progress&#039; so your &quot;failure&quot; is &quot;insufficient progress&quot; according to the delusional standards of the left. That means paying for everyone to be happy and &quot;feel successful&quot; even when they don&#039;t go to class enough to graduate high school. 
 
Welcome to Shangrila. I&#039;m your host and I&#039;ll show you how to be the first one to get the worm. 
 
&quot;If it worked our middle class would be the king of the world economy, and we&#039;re not. And it has nothing to do with Obamamarxistcommunistislamistterroristkenyan... you infant.&quot; 
 
When I grow up I&#039;ll better understand social justice and the wisdom of the leftist fantasies, no doubt. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;No, it&#039;s the theory that super low tax rates spurs growth and raises all boats&quot; </p>
<p>You&#039;re not 100% wrong so I&#039;ll let it go for now. </p>
<p>&quot;while producing enough revenue to cover the cost of running the government&quot; </p>
<p>Nope. It doesn&#039;t assume you can spend indefinitely. The point is that taxes have dynamic effects and that if you choke off cash flow with taxes, that money is in the hands of the government and is therefore being less productive rather than flowing through the private sector (where it is always more productive). The reason people refer to these theories as &quot;trickle down&quot; is the recognition that successful people and businesses hire others in the lower income realms and that it benefits everyone even when &quot;the rich&quot; are not taxed according to superficial notions of &quot;fairness&quot; according to the views of unsuccessful people. </p>
<p>&quot;It&#039;s wrong.&quot; </p>
<p>Wow, straw is flying all over the place. We&#039;re so impressed. </p>
<p>&quot;We&#039;ve been doing that for 30+ years.&quot; </p>
<p>It works when we do it. Leftists always interfere though and want &quot;progress&#039; so your &quot;failure&quot; is &quot;insufficient progress&quot; according to the delusional standards of the left. That means paying for everyone to be happy and &quot;feel successful&quot; even when they don&#039;t go to class enough to graduate high school. </p>
<p>Welcome to Shangrila. I&#039;m your host and I&#039;ll show you how to be the first one to get the worm. </p>
<p>&quot;If it worked our middle class would be the king of the world economy, and we&#039;re not. And it has nothing to do with Obamamarxistcommunistislamistterroristkenyan&#8230; you infant.&quot; </p>
<p>When I grow up I&#039;ll better understand social justice and the wisdom of the leftist fantasies, no doubt. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 02:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Republcians are too obsessed with Obama&quot; 
 
 
Republicans are too impressed with 0&#039;Bama&#039;s power in controlling the discourse. They need to go on the offensive.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Republcians are too obsessed with Obama&quot; </p>
<p>Republicans are too impressed with 0&#039;Bama&#039;s power in controlling the discourse. They need to go on the offensive.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 02:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Do your own f**king research, you lazy sumbeach!&quot;  
 
OMG that is so funny. I guess &quot;the force&quot; really is &quot;with you.&quot;  
  
In the research I did perform in good faith, the only people who support you are those who claim that people are afraid of 0&#039;Bama-care. So maybe in the current climate the argument can be made subjectively. Is that the point you are trying to make, that 0&#039;Bama-care is causing fear among productive people? You have a strange way of trying to make your points.  
  
See, I thought you presented 0&#039;Bama-care as the answer, not the problem. Maybe I misunderstood you. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Do your own f**king research, you lazy sumbeach!&quot;  </p>
<p>OMG that is so funny. I guess &quot;the force&quot; really is &quot;with you.&quot;  </p>
<p>In the research I did perform in good faith, the only people who support you are those who claim that people are afraid of 0&#039;Bama-care. So maybe in the current climate the argument can be made subjectively. Is that the point you are trying to make, that 0&#039;Bama-care is causing fear among productive people? You have a strange way of trying to make your points.  </p>
<p>See, I thought you presented 0&#039;Bama-care as the answer, not the problem. Maybe I misunderstood you. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 02:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;But the Tea Party didn&#039;t win that argument. Their position was if there was not a problem with healthcare costs at all.&quot; 
 
 
Their position was and is that the federal government doesn&#039;t have the answer. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;But the Tea Party didn&#039;t win that argument. Their position was if there was not a problem with healthcare costs at all.&quot; </p>
<p>Their position was and is that the federal government doesn&#039;t have the answer. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 02:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Which marxist professor was she listening to when she made her mind up about Santorum?&quot; 
 
She probably listened to every Marxist professor she ever met, just like her brother. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Which marxist professor was she listening to when she made her mind up about Santorum?&quot; </p>
<p>She probably listened to every Marxist professor she ever met, just like her brother. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 02:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOP: &quot;We love our misremembered nostalgia about how America used to be. But we hate it now and will &#039;take it back!&#039;&quot; 
 
Yeah, clearly defined support for free speech laws, being able to defend ourselves against foreign enemies all that BS never existed before. Being able to work towards success without being accused of fraud or theft was never a part of the past. Being able to decline an invitation to marry or condone th marriage of two or more people based on successful tradition, that&#039;s all thinking based on false memories. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOP: &quot;We love our misremembered nostalgia about how America used to be. But we hate it now and will &#039;take it back!&#039;&quot; </p>
<p>Yeah, clearly defined support for free speech laws, being able to defend ourselves against foreign enemies all that BS never existed before. Being able to work towards success without being accused of fraud or theft was never a part of the past. Being able to decline an invitation to marry or condone th marriage of two or more people based on successful tradition, that&#039;s all thinking based on false memories. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 02:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Actually we&#039;re both registered Republicans and quite conservative voters. Try again, fools.&quot; 
 
 
Every word you utter is the result of leftist indoctrination. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Actually we&#039;re both registered Republicans and quite conservative voters. Try again, fools.&quot; </p>
<p>Every word you utter is the result of leftist indoctrination. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 02:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Me: &quot;Without question both Darwinism and global warming adherents use incredible amounts of junk science and the burden of proof is on them.&quot; 
 
 
You: &quot;No.&quot; 
 
No to what? 
 
&quot;Global warming is a legitimate scientific theory.&quot; 
 
I agree it&#039;s a legitimate theory for research, not influencing regulations until they prove their case with sufficient evidence.  
 
&quot;It can and should be questioned scientifically, and adjusted if need be. But simply ranting that &quot;libruls!&quot; are out to take over the world in the name of the environment is political fantacism, not science at all.&quot; 
 
Nobody said that was science. That&#039;s political rhetoric. Positions are tested with science. The positions themselves are not required to be &quot;the science.&quot; The problem is that you are a troll that only reads the rhetoric without testing who is right. That&#039;s your problem that you blame on others. You&#039;re typical of the left in that regard. That&#039;s one of the distinguishing characteristics of the left. 
 
&quot;Creationism is not science in any way, shape or form.&quot; 
 
It depends on how you define &quot;creationism.&quot; There&#039;s a lot of strong science that destroys Darwinism on the basis of earth age, showing evidence for the global flood and virtually ever major position staked out by Darwin supporters. Your ignorance proves nothing. I suppose you do your own research and you do it by reading &quot;progressive&quot; blogs. You have to follow the evidence chain, not the mere claims to see if they have footnotes. Challenge the footnotes. 
 
Darwinsm is a huge sophisticated theory developed to answer the question, &quot;Given we know that God does not exist, how do we explain the world as we find it?&quot; 
 
Do you see the flaw? Louis Pasteur destroyed Darwin&#039;s theory but nobody paid attention to that. They simply kept going and took decades to work around the evidence Pasteur provided. Given that life comes from life, you can see just how much faith is required to believe in Darwinistic theory. Once you have that absolute faith, finding out &quot;the most plausible way&quot; to determine that evolution explains all life is just a matter of effort. Darwinism is the most popular theory supported by the cultural elites. They&#039;re the ones that hand out the most research funds. 
 
But political considerations can&#039;t possibly influence the outcome of research findings. No way. Can&#039;t happen. 
 
&quot;Creationism is not science in any way, shape or form. It is not another legitimate scientific theory that needs to be taught &quot;along side&quot; evolution.&quot; 
 
The problem is that there are more &quot;faith based&quot; creation theories than those relying purely on science. If you ignore the science you can pretend it doesn&#039;t exist. Good for you. So we discover that Coo coo birds also behave like ostriches. 
 
&quot;Creationism is a religious allegory of how God made the world, not a scientific description.&quot; 
 
Both exist. You pretend the science doesn&#039;t when it does. Your inability to find something is not evidence. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me: &quot;Without question both Darwinism and global warming adherents use incredible amounts of junk science and the burden of proof is on them.&quot; </p>
<p>You: &quot;No.&quot; </p>
<p>No to what? </p>
<p>&quot;Global warming is a legitimate scientific theory.&quot; </p>
<p>I agree it&#039;s a legitimate theory for research, not influencing regulations until they prove their case with sufficient evidence.  </p>
<p>&quot;It can and should be questioned scientifically, and adjusted if need be. But simply ranting that &quot;libruls!&quot; are out to take over the world in the name of the environment is political fantacism, not science at all.&quot; </p>
<p>Nobody said that was science. That&#039;s political rhetoric. Positions are tested with science. The positions themselves are not required to be &quot;the science.&quot; The problem is that you are a troll that only reads the rhetoric without testing who is right. That&#039;s your problem that you blame on others. You&#039;re typical of the left in that regard. That&#039;s one of the distinguishing characteristics of the left. </p>
<p>&quot;Creationism is not science in any way, shape or form.&quot; </p>
<p>It depends on how you define &quot;creationism.&quot; There&#039;s a lot of strong science that destroys Darwinism on the basis of earth age, showing evidence for the global flood and virtually ever major position staked out by Darwin supporters. Your ignorance proves nothing. I suppose you do your own research and you do it by reading &quot;progressive&quot; blogs. You have to follow the evidence chain, not the mere claims to see if they have footnotes. Challenge the footnotes. </p>
<p>Darwinsm is a huge sophisticated theory developed to answer the question, &quot;Given we know that God does not exist, how do we explain the world as we find it?&quot; </p>
<p>Do you see the flaw? Louis Pasteur destroyed Darwin&#039;s theory but nobody paid attention to that. They simply kept going and took decades to work around the evidence Pasteur provided. Given that life comes from life, you can see just how much faith is required to believe in Darwinistic theory. Once you have that absolute faith, finding out &quot;the most plausible way&quot; to determine that evolution explains all life is just a matter of effort. Darwinism is the most popular theory supported by the cultural elites. They&#039;re the ones that hand out the most research funds. </p>
<p>But political considerations can&#039;t possibly influence the outcome of research findings. No way. Can&#039;t happen. </p>
<p>&quot;Creationism is not science in any way, shape or form. It is not another legitimate scientific theory that needs to be taught &quot;along side&quot; evolution.&quot; </p>
<p>The problem is that there are more &quot;faith based&quot; creation theories than those relying purely on science. If you ignore the science you can pretend it doesn&#039;t exist. Good for you. So we discover that Coo coo birds also behave like ostriches. </p>
<p>&quot;Creationism is a religious allegory of how God made the world, not a scientific description.&quot; </p>
<p>Both exist. You pretend the science doesn&#039;t when it does. Your inability to find something is not evidence. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 01:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;One of the reasons we have so many regulations, and stupid ones, is that we don&#039;t keep the two types of banks separate.&quot; 
 
That&#039;s not a new theory. Separating them limits profits which in theory drives costs up for the consumer. Why don&#039;t you pass more laws to keep fools from going nuts with credit card debt that they don&#039;t understand? Why don&#039;t you regulate how much debt a consumer can take on depending on what they buy? That would be a lot more helpful, but not the kind of authoritarianism that leftists accept. You&#039;d rather tell &quot;corporations&quot; what to do to protect stupidity. The more you &quot;protect&quot; stupid people, the dumber they get. 
 
That&#039;s your plan, which I can understand on one level because you&#039;re just another one of the confused. 
 
The answer is to revamp our education. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;One of the reasons we have so many regulations, and stupid ones, is that we don&#039;t keep the two types of banks separate.&quot; </p>
<p>That&#039;s not a new theory. Separating them limits profits which in theory drives costs up for the consumer. Why don&#039;t you pass more laws to keep fools from going nuts with credit card debt that they don&#039;t understand? Why don&#039;t you regulate how much debt a consumer can take on depending on what they buy? That would be a lot more helpful, but not the kind of authoritarianism that leftists accept. You&#039;d rather tell &quot;corporations&quot; what to do to protect stupidity. The more you &quot;protect&quot; stupid people, the dumber they get. </p>
<p>That&#039;s your plan, which I can understand on one level because you&#039;re just another one of the confused. </p>
<p>The answer is to revamp our education. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 01:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;We can &quot;break up the banks&quot; by ensuring that real banking is separate from investment banking.&quot; 
 
Because consumers aren&#039;t smart enough to know what products and services they sign up for, we must regulate and limit those who offer these products. 
 
How much do we spend on educating people in this country, yet we impose stupid regulations on industries rather than teaching consumers how to understand what they sign up for? And it&#039;s not like these continuous experiments ever cause in problems of their own. 
 
The banking crisis was caused by the wrong regulations. As I said before, regulations should ensure fraud and deception and other examples of bad faith are discouraged and punished. But if we don&#039;t educate our children on how to engage in financial transactions and contracts without getting lost, then we can&#039;t regulate our way out of that problem. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;We can &quot;break up the banks&quot; by ensuring that real banking is separate from investment banking.&quot; </p>
<p>Because consumers aren&#039;t smart enough to know what products and services they sign up for, we must regulate and limit those who offer these products. </p>
<p>How much do we spend on educating people in this country, yet we impose stupid regulations on industries rather than teaching consumers how to understand what they sign up for? And it&#039;s not like these continuous experiments ever cause in problems of their own. </p>
<p>The banking crisis was caused by the wrong regulations. As I said before, regulations should ensure fraud and deception and other examples of bad faith are discouraged and punished. But if we don&#039;t educate our children on how to engage in financial transactions and contracts without getting lost, then we can&#039;t regulate our way out of that problem. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 01:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I don&#039;t blame &quot;free enterprise,&quot; nor am I against it. But we need smart regulations...&quot; 
 
 
Aha. Exactly. Next you need to recognize you&#039;re not smart enough to judge which regulations are the &quot;smart&quot; ones and which caused the problems. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;I don&#039;t blame &quot;free enterprise,&quot; nor am I against it. But we need smart regulations&#8230;&quot; </p>
<p>Aha. Exactly. Next you need to recognize you&#039;re not smart enough to judge which regulations are the &quot;smart&quot; ones and which caused the problems. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4337174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 01:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4337174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;that&#039;s because we don&#039;t have idiotic banking and lending laws. And we don&#039;t force banks to loan to people who cannot pay it back in order to incur fairness in home ownership.&quot; 
 
Few people realize that the USA does impose this on our banks in the name of &quot;fairness.&quot; Because fairness is not about equal opportunity and or even equal results for equivalent effort, it&#039;s about equal results for class victims no matter how little effort they muster. 
 
Even fewer people realize this was the root cause of the banking crisis that revealed itself fully in the late Bush years. 
 
No no no, we need to regulate derivatives. What&#039;s a derivative? I don&#039;t know, but surely regulating them will fix everything. The talking heads said so...I think. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;that&#039;s because we don&#039;t have idiotic banking and lending laws. And we don&#039;t force banks to loan to people who cannot pay it back in order to incur fairness in home ownership.&quot; </p>
<p>Few people realize that the USA does impose this on our banks in the name of &quot;fairness.&quot; Because fairness is not about equal opportunity and or even equal results for equivalent effort, it&#039;s about equal results for class victims no matter how little effort they muster. </p>
<p>Even fewer people realize this was the root cause of the banking crisis that revealed itself fully in the late Bush years. </p>
<p>No no no, we need to regulate derivatives. What&#039;s a derivative? I don&#039;t know, but surely regulating them will fix everything. The talking heads said so&#8230;I think. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlcblog</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4336281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mlcblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 20:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4336281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remarks like this make anyone&#039;s stomach or something hurt... 
 
Caustic, spiteful. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remarks like this make anyone&#039;s stomach or something hurt&#8230; </p>
<p>Caustic, spiteful. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4336012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 18:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4336012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, everyone who disagrees with you is a &quot;troll.&quot;  That&#039;s got to be comforting living in this little right wing bubble.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, everyone who disagrees with you is a &quot;troll.&quot;  That&#039;s got to be comforting living in this little right wing bubble.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4336002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 18:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4336002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, so Obama didn&#039;t &quot;steal!&quot; the election?  You may be coming around, Reader.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, so Obama didn&#039;t &quot;steal!&quot; the election?  You may be coming around, Reader.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/can-obama-be-stopped/comment-page-1/#comment-4335999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 18:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=179107#comment-4335999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re definitely right that Americans feel that way about these two social issues, especially gay marriage, but that&#039;s not what cost Romney the election.  The unserious, orthodox extremism witnessed daily on this psychotic website iis what cost him the election. 
 
The American people want a serious problem solver, not a person who has turned politics into a religion.  Romney could not be himself during the nomination process, due to the insane right wing fringe which has taken over the GOP.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#039;re definitely right that Americans feel that way about these two social issues, especially gay marriage, but that&#039;s not what cost Romney the election.  The unserious, orthodox extremism witnessed daily on this psychotic website iis what cost him the election. </p>
<p>The American people want a serious problem solver, not a person who has turned politics into a religion.  Romney could not be himself during the nomination process, due to the insane right wing fringe which has taken over the GOP.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 712/783 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 17:28:34 by W3 Total Cache -->