<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court Finds NLRB Unconstitutional, NLRB Ignores Court &amp; Constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: kafir4life</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-4203399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kafir4life]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 18:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=175061#comment-4203399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s good reason they call b.o. Stinky.  It&#039;s because of that odor that b.o. exudes. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s good reason they call b.o. Stinky.  It&#039;s because of that odor that b.o. exudes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atthebeach</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-4203045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[atthebeach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=175061#comment-4203045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rule of Law to be enforced - or Rule of Obama?  The power of our Constitution; or the power of Obama?  Justice must prevail here.  And the next move is? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rule of Law to be enforced &#8211; or Rule of Obama?  The power of our Constitution; or the power of Obama?  Justice must prevail here.  And the next move is? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flicker</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-4202197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flicker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=175061#comment-4202197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here on Front Page one headline was Iran will have and will use a nuclear bomb this year.  Earlier on Front Page a video speaker told us that one bomb could reduce the whole US to a starving mass by a single EMP pulse; and this could be prevented for only a billion dollars.  Has Obama done this?  Begun this?  Talked about this as a shovel-ready stimulus?  No.  He wants the US to be vulnerable. 
 
If you were Iran preparing the world for the mahdi, which would be your first choice to bomb?  Israel or the US?  I don&#8217;t know, but if I were a world-wasting savage bent on inducing a muslim apocalypse, I think destroying the US would make the rest of the world much more pliable.  &#8220;Who,&#8221; the world will say, &#8220;can make war with him?&#8221; 
 
And it would give the mahdi the fun of destroying God&#8217;s people at his leisure.  Say, after signing a nice peace treaty with Israel.  And letting them rebuild their Temple.  So that he can seat himself in it and declare himself to be god. 
 
In the meantime, we get to watch Obama stand imperiously in front of his gold brocade backdrop and say, &#8220;Oh, yes I did!  I built that!&#8221; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here on Front Page one headline was Iran will have and will use a nuclear bomb this year.  Earlier on Front Page a video speaker told us that one bomb could reduce the whole US to a starving mass by a single EMP pulse; and this could be prevented for only a billion dollars.  Has Obama done this?  Begun this?  Talked about this as a shovel-ready stimulus?  No.  He wants the US to be vulnerable. </p>
<p>If you were Iran preparing the world for the mahdi, which would be your first choice to bomb?  Israel or the US?  I don&rsquo;t know, but if I were a world-wasting savage bent on inducing a muslim apocalypse, I think destroying the US would make the rest of the world much more pliable.  &ldquo;Who,&rdquo; the world will say, &ldquo;can make war with him?&rdquo; </p>
<p>And it would give the mahdi the fun of destroying God&rsquo;s people at his leisure.  Say, after signing a nice peace treaty with Israel.  And letting them rebuild their Temple.  So that he can seat himself in it and declare himself to be god. </p>
<p>In the meantime, we get to watch Obama stand imperiously in front of his gold brocade backdrop and say, &ldquo;Oh, yes I did!  I built that!&rdquo; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flicker</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-4202127</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flicker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=175061#comment-4202127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only thing left to do will be build a new ship.  That, by definition, would be revolution. 
 
But the new civilian defense force (known by the Orwellian name Homeland Security) will have it&#039;s  
 
750,000,000 hollow point bullets to prevent that, and to enforce his rule.  I don&#039;t want to be pessimistic, but I don&#039;t see any good way out of this short of national repentance in sackcloth and ashes. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing left to do will be build a new ship.  That, by definition, would be revolution. </p>
<p>But the new civilian defense force (known by the Orwellian name Homeland Security) will have it&#039;s  </p>
<p>750,000,000 hollow point bullets to prevent that, and to enforce his rule.  I don&#039;t want to be pessimistic, but I don&#039;t see any good way out of this short of national repentance in sackcloth and ashes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flicker</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-4202126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flicker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=175061#comment-4202126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, Obama is a dictator consolidating his power.  The courts mean nothing.  The rule of law can be imposed by executive order or waived.  His DOJ is a kangaroo.  He has ordered America&#039;s first honest to goodness political prisoner.  He&#039;s ousting Generals and Admirals for slight or feigned offenses.  He&#039;s taken over our health care and, resultantly, our bodies. Next he&#039;ll be outlawing foods and the FDA will make salted butter a controlled substance. 
 
I think Jamie Glazov, or one of his guests today, referred to the US as a sinking ship and said it needs constant work to keep it afloat.  It&#039;s a great metaphor.  Like a ship the US may sink before a new captain can be sent aboard. 
 
There is no time to sit and wait.  You have to work around the incompetent captain to keep it from sinking while he continues to run it against the rocks.  Except that there are no life boats and nowhere to flee to. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Obama is a dictator consolidating his power.  The courts mean nothing.  The rule of law can be imposed by executive order or waived.  His DOJ is a kangaroo.  He has ordered America&#039;s first honest to goodness political prisoner.  He&#039;s ousting Generals and Admirals for slight or feigned offenses.  He&#039;s taken over our health care and, resultantly, our bodies. Next he&#039;ll be outlawing foods and the FDA will make salted butter a controlled substance. </p>
<p>I think Jamie Glazov, or one of his guests today, referred to the US as a sinking ship and said it needs constant work to keep it afloat.  It&#039;s a great metaphor.  Like a ship the US may sink before a new captain can be sent aboard. </p>
<p>There is no time to sit and wait.  You have to work around the incompetent captain to keep it from sinking while he continues to run it against the rocks.  Except that there are no life boats and nowhere to flee to. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart (Austin, TX)</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-4201691</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart (Austin, TX)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 06:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=175061#comment-4201691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NLRB is known for egregious overreaching. In the case of New Process Steel v. NLRB (see URL &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1457.pdf),&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-145...&lt;/a&gt; the U.S. Supreme Court held that the NLRB had been acting for years without a legitimate quorum because it had only 2 members and the enabling legislation required 3 members for a quorum. With no quorum, nothing the NLRB did was legitimate. The NLRB&#039;s position was that on the eve of its 3rd member&#039;s term expiring (literally at 11:59 p.m. on December 31) that member delegated his authority to the remaining 2 members. The NLRB argued that was a legitimate delegation to preserve a quorum to act. It was shameless b.s. then, and the NLRB has distinguished itself for shameless b.s. ever since (e.g., it&#039;s harassment of Boeing over opening its South Carolina manufacturing plant).  
 
Obama&#039;s made his erstwhile &quot;recess appointments&quot; because of the USSC&#039;s decision in the New Process Steel case.  Instead of just appointing one or more new members, subject to Senate-approval -- which is how the balance of powers requires it to be done -- Obama just opted for unconstitutional chicanery.   That&#039;s just who he is.  
 
I am glad to see the NLRB called to the carpet.  It is an obsolete, over-funded bureaucracy that exists SOLELY to shore up parasitic, pro-Democrat Party organizations like SEIU. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NLRB is known for egregious overreaching. In the case of New Process Steel v. NLRB (see URL <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1457.pdf)," rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-145" rel="nofollow">http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-145</a>&#8230; the U.S. Supreme Court held that the NLRB had been acting for years without a legitimate quorum because it had only 2 members and the enabling legislation required 3 members for a quorum. With no quorum, nothing the NLRB did was legitimate. The NLRB&#8217;s position was that on the eve of its 3rd member&#8217;s term expiring (literally at 11:59 p.m. on December 31) that member delegated his authority to the remaining 2 members. The NLRB argued that was a legitimate delegation to preserve a quorum to act. It was shameless b.s. then, and the NLRB has distinguished itself for shameless b.s. ever since (e.g., it&#8217;s harassment of Boeing over opening its South Carolina manufacturing plant). </p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s made his erstwhile &#8220;recess appointments&#8221; because of the USSC&#8217;s decision in the New Process Steel case.  Instead of just appointing one or more new members, subject to Senate-approval &#8212; which is how the balance of powers requires it to be done &#8212; Obama just opted for unconstitutional chicanery.   That&#8217;s just who he is. </p>
<p>I am glad to see the NLRB called to the carpet.  It is an obsolete, over-funded bureaucracy that exists SOLELY to shore up parasitic, pro-Democrat Party organizations like SEIU. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 11bravo</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-4201629</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[11bravo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=175061#comment-4201629</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All of their decisions are invalid. All of the effected businesses should send them notice that they will not follow any of their decree&#039;s. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of their decisions are invalid. All of the effected businesses should send them notice that they will not follow any of their decree&#039;s. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 11bravo</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-4201624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[11bravo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 05:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=175061#comment-4201624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would go to the DA&#039;s office of the state where the NLRB resides. Hopefully it is not in DC proper. I would arrest them all, and carry out as much documentation as I could. If I were McConnell and Boehner I would get crackin on it. 
Everyone seems to want to grab power, maybe we can find a balsey DA. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would go to the DA&#039;s office of the state where the NLRB resides. Hopefully it is not in DC proper. I would arrest them all, and carry out as much documentation as I could. If I were McConnell and Boehner I would get crackin on it.<br />
Everyone seems to want to grab power, maybe we can find a balsey DA. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greycoat</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-4201460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greycoat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 04:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=175061#comment-4201460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am so tired of the corruption, lies, deceit, and aspiring tyranny and lawlessness of this regime.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so tired of the corruption, lies, deceit, and aspiring tyranny and lawlessness of this regime.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greycoat</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-4201452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greycoat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 04:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=175061#comment-4201452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This so angers me. These people should be hung by the neck until dead. They should do nothing. They have not applied for a stay of the order pending appeal, and have gotten a signed order granting the stay, so they have no authority to proceed. But they just thumb their noses at the court. If I were a business, I would file a notice with the board that I would not be attending any further proceedings before this board until the matter was resolved in the courts. I would as a business file a motion for protective order. An order to show cause why they shouldn&#039;t be held in contempt should also be filed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This so angers me. These people should be hung by the neck until dead. They should do nothing. They have not applied for a stay of the order pending appeal, and have gotten a signed order granting the stay, so they have no authority to proceed. But they just thumb their noses at the court. If I were a business, I would file a notice with the board that I would not be attending any further proceedings before this board until the matter was resolved in the courts. I would as a business file a motion for protective order. An order to show cause why they shouldn&#8217;t be held in contempt should also be filed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-4201443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 04:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=175061#comment-4201443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Impeachment time.  Get rid of the imperial tyrant. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Impeachment time.  Get rid of the imperial tyrant. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Cline</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-4201436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Cline]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 04:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=175061#comment-4201436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama&#039;s attitude and approach are the attitude and approach of Vladimir Putin or of any other dictator or tyrant. What? Badges? We don&#039;t need no stinkin&#039; badges.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#039;s attitude and approach are the attitude and approach of Vladimir Putin or of any other dictator or tyrant. What? Badges? We don&#039;t need no stinkin&#039; badges.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/court-finds-nrlb-unconstitutional-nlrb-ignores-court-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-4201367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Sue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 03:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=175061#comment-4201367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama&#039;s never been about the Rule of Law.  Or even the Rule of 5. (-supreme court justices).  It&#039;s always been about the rule of HIM. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#039;s never been about the Rule of Law.  Or even the Rule of 5. (-supreme court justices).  It&#039;s always been about the rule of HIM. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 550/555 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 14:28:17 by W3 Total Cache -->