<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did China get its September 11?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=did-china-get-its-september-11</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: kate5778b</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5303177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kate5778b]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5303177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gosh, that long? I stopped buying it because of their anti-Israel stance too, pity because their nature /exploration articles are very good.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, that long? I stopped buying it because of their anti-Israel stance too, pity because their nature /exploration articles are very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5302551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziggy zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5302551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He gotcha. Just admit it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He gotcha. Just admit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drakken</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5302252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drakken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5302252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have to kind of laugh at the muslims who pizz off the chicoms, they aren&#039;t afraid to killem all and let allah sortem out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to kind of laugh at the muslims who pizz off the chicoms, they aren&#8217;t afraid to killem all and let allah sortem out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakareh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5302218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jakareh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5302218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They go where rents are cheap and welfare is generous, so not a single one will go to Beverly Hills or the Hamptons. Instead, they go to places like St. Paul, Minnesota; Columbus, Ohio; and Lewiston, Maine, and regular Americans pay the price.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They go where rents are cheap and welfare is generous, so not a single one will go to Beverly Hills or the Hamptons. Instead, they go to places like St. Paul, Minnesota; Columbus, Ohio; and Lewiston, Maine, and regular Americans pay the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ObamaYoMoma</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ObamaYoMoma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 05:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peace is a permanent solution; a Hudna, on the other hand, is just a temporary truce for a maximum of 10 years. It is not peace.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peace is a permanent solution; a Hudna, on the other hand, is just a temporary truce for a maximum of 10 years. It is not peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ObamaYoMoma</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ObamaYoMoma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I&#039;d think terrorism would at least qualify as a tactic used in jihad.&lt;/i&gt;

Apparently, you don&#039;t have an understanding of what terrorism actually is and thus you misconstrue and conflate it with being a tactic. First of all, the notion that terrorism is just a so-called tactic is very wrong and very false, as terrorism must always also have a political cause behind it. In fact, infidels that perpetrate terrorism are political extremists, like the Unabomber, Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers. Meanwhile, jihadists, on the other hand, are always and only mainstream orthodox Muslims as opposed to extremists waging jihad, because waging jihad is a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all mainstream orthodox Muslim in one form or another. Not to mention that terrorism is always and only violent, while jihad, in stark contrast, manifests both violently and non-violently, but overall astronomically far more non-violently relative to violently. 

As long as you continue to conflate and confuse what is actually war, which manifest both violently and non-violently, as somehow being terrorism, which manifest only violently, per your mass media indoctrination, you will never ever be able to fully understand the nuances of the threat that Islam presents. Muslims aren&#039;t political extremists perpetrating terrorism for various political reasons, because that would be blasphemous and blasphemy in Islam is a capital offense. Instead, Muslims are waging holy war (jihad) in the cause of Allah, because waging jihad is a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims in one form or another. Political extremist infidels perpetrate terrorism for all kinds of various political reasons. Meanwhile, mainstream orthodox Muslims, on the other hand, wage jihad (holy war) always and only in the cause of Allah, which manifest both violently and non-violently, but overall astronomically far more non-violently relative to violently. 

Terrorism is extreme violence perpetrated by political extremists usually against innocents for various political causes. Jihad, on the other hand, is a very strategic war in the cause of Allah to ultimately make Islam supreme and manifests like all wars both violently and non-violently. Now, like terrorists, violent jihadists like to target innocents, but that&#039;s because violent jihad primarily manifests via total war tactics. 

I guess for you, Muslims would have to dress up in military uniforms and wage war only against militaries like the West for it not to be construed as terrorism, even though Muslims are products of a completely foreign and alien civilization apart from our Christian-Judeo civilization. Man...it&#039;s exceedingly hard, if not impossible, for you to step outside the box. 

Indeed, I know a few years ago someone wrote something to the effect that we are not at war with terrorism because terrorism is a tactic, and that we are at war with Islam instead. Whoever wrote that was only partially correct, we are at war with Islam because Islam is at war with all religions and all infidels, but, on the other hand, terrorism is not just a tactic. Apparently, whoever wrote that like you didn&#039;t understand what terrorism actually is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I&#8217;d think terrorism would at least qualify as a tactic used in jihad.</i></p>
<p>Apparently, you don&#8217;t have an understanding of what terrorism actually is and thus you misconstrue and conflate it with being a tactic. First of all, the notion that terrorism is just a so-called tactic is very wrong and very false, as terrorism must always also have a political cause behind it. In fact, infidels that perpetrate terrorism are political extremists, like the Unabomber, Bernadine Dohrn and Bill Ayers. Meanwhile, jihadists, on the other hand, are always and only mainstream orthodox Muslims as opposed to extremists waging jihad, because waging jihad is a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all mainstream orthodox Muslim in one form or another. Not to mention that terrorism is always and only violent, while jihad, in stark contrast, manifests both violently and non-violently, but overall astronomically far more non-violently relative to violently. </p>
<p>As long as you continue to conflate and confuse what is actually war, which manifest both violently and non-violently, as somehow being terrorism, which manifest only violently, per your mass media indoctrination, you will never ever be able to fully understand the nuances of the threat that Islam presents. Muslims aren&#8217;t political extremists perpetrating terrorism for various political reasons, because that would be blasphemous and blasphemy in Islam is a capital offense. Instead, Muslims are waging holy war (jihad) in the cause of Allah, because waging jihad is a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims in one form or another. Political extremist infidels perpetrate terrorism for all kinds of various political reasons. Meanwhile, mainstream orthodox Muslims, on the other hand, wage jihad (holy war) always and only in the cause of Allah, which manifest both violently and non-violently, but overall astronomically far more non-violently relative to violently. </p>
<p>Terrorism is extreme violence perpetrated by political extremists usually against innocents for various political causes. Jihad, on the other hand, is a very strategic war in the cause of Allah to ultimately make Islam supreme and manifests like all wars both violently and non-violently. Now, like terrorists, violent jihadists like to target innocents, but that&#8217;s because violent jihad primarily manifests via total war tactics. </p>
<p>I guess for you, Muslims would have to dress up in military uniforms and wage war only against militaries like the West for it not to be construed as terrorism, even though Muslims are products of a completely foreign and alien civilization apart from our Christian-Judeo civilization. Man&#8230;it&#8217;s exceedingly hard, if not impossible, for you to step outside the box. </p>
<p>Indeed, I know a few years ago someone wrote something to the effect that we are not at war with terrorism because terrorism is a tactic, and that we are at war with Islam instead. Whoever wrote that was only partially correct, we are at war with Islam because Islam is at war with all religions and all infidels, but, on the other hand, terrorism is not just a tactic. Apparently, whoever wrote that like you didn&#8217;t understand what terrorism actually is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moa</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Moa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 04:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; &quot;as Muslims can never ever make peace with infidels&quot;


Correction amigo, Muslims cannot make *permanent* peace. They may make temporary truces, called &quot;hudna&quot; for up to ten years.


One problem is that the West does not understand the concepts or limitation of hudna. Therefore they are suckered into believing that Islamists can be &quot;peace partners&quot; - when this is prohibited by Islam except for short time periods.


Otherwise, your post was spot in. jihad is predominantly non-violent undermining of non-Muslim society, with a bit of violence on top to keep everyone&#039;s head down as the political transformation is made.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; &#8220;as Muslims can never ever make peace with infidels&#8221;</p>
<p>Correction amigo, Muslims cannot make *permanent* peace. They may make temporary truces, called &#8220;hudna&#8221; for up to ten years.</p>
<p>One problem is that the West does not understand the concepts or limitation of hudna. Therefore they are suckered into believing that Islamists can be &#8220;peace partners&#8221; &#8211; when this is prohibited by Islam except for short time periods.</p>
<p>Otherwise, your post was spot in. jihad is predominantly non-violent undermining of non-Muslim society, with a bit of violence on top to keep everyone&#8217;s head down as the political transformation is made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: defcon 4</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[defcon 4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As long as they live in lieberal communities I almost don&#039;t mind. Let them live in Beverly Hills, let them live in Long Island. Let the islam0nazis live among their admirers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as they live in lieberal communities I almost don&#8217;t mind. Let them live in Beverly Hills, let them live in Long Island. Let the islam0nazis live among their admirers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ObamaYoMoma</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301698</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ObamaYoMoma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Israel is a victim of a very perpetual and very strategic jihad (holy war) to ultimately make Islam supreme, as opposed to it just being terrorism perpetrated in response to harsh Israeli policies. As a matter of fact, that very strategic jihad being waged against the infidel state of Israel, exactly like all the many other jihads around the world, manifests through both violent and non-violent jihad, but overall astronomically far more via non-violent jihad relative to violent jihad, as, indeed, the massive amounts of taqiyya demonizing Israel and the Jews worldwide is really stealth and deceptive non-violent jihad intended to isolate and weaken Israel. As a matter of fact, the so-called peace process is really stealth and deceptive non-violent jihad intended to weaken Israel, as Muslims can never ever make peace with infidels. Indeed, the non-violent aspects of that jihad relative to the violent aspects of that jihad are far more detrimental to the survival of Israel. Nevertheless, as long as people continue to conflate and confuse jihad (holy war) as somehow being just terrorism in response to harsh Israeli policies or terrorism perpetrated by Islamic extremists, people will always continue to fail to understand what is really happening over there in Israel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Israel is a victim of a very perpetual and very strategic jihad (holy war) to ultimately make Islam supreme, as opposed to it just being terrorism perpetrated in response to harsh Israeli policies. As a matter of fact, that very strategic jihad being waged against the infidel state of Israel, exactly like all the many other jihads around the world, manifests through both violent and non-violent jihad, but overall astronomically far more via non-violent jihad relative to violent jihad, as, indeed, the massive amounts of taqiyya demonizing Israel and the Jews worldwide is really stealth and deceptive non-violent jihad intended to isolate and weaken Israel. As a matter of fact, the so-called peace process is really stealth and deceptive non-violent jihad intended to weaken Israel, as Muslims can never ever make peace with infidels. Indeed, the non-violent aspects of that jihad relative to the violent aspects of that jihad are far more detrimental to the survival of Israel. Nevertheless, as long as people continue to conflate and confuse jihad (holy war) as somehow being just terrorism in response to harsh Israeli policies or terrorism perpetrated by Islamic extremists, people will always continue to fail to understand what is really happening over there in Israel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: defcon 4</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[defcon 4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d think terrorism would at least qualify as a tactic used in jihad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d think terrorism would at least qualify as a tactic used in jihad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: defcon 4</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[defcon 4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 03:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Islam, spreading peace and tolerance wherever it goes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Islam, spreading peace and tolerance wherever it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ObamaYoMoma</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ObamaYoMoma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 02:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;China has predictably fallen into censorship mode, but it’s obvious that its leaders are being forced to come to terms with the fact that they may be facing a terrorist campaign similar to the one experienced in Europe, America, Israel and other parts of the world where Muslim minorities backed by foreign interests cause violent mischief.&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s about as idiotic an analogy as it gets. Muslims aren&#039;t perpetrating terrorism in Europe, America, Israel, and now also China in response to provocations, or imperialism, or interventions, or because of a tiny minority of extremists, or to make mischief. Instead, Muslims are waging jihad (holy war) around the world to eventually subjugate into Islamic totalitarianism all religions and all infidels via the imposition of Sharia (Islamic totalitarian law) to ultimately make Islam supreme. This is a very strategic war as opposed to just terrorism and this war manifests both violently and non-violently, but overall astronomically far more non-violently relative to violently. As a matter of fact, the OIC&#039;s worldwide campaign to outlaw speaking the truth about Islam because according to them it&#039;s Islamophobia is an example of non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad, while this China attack, on the other hand, is an example of violent jihad. Both violent and non-violent tactics are part of the same very strategic jihad (holy war) intended to ultimately make Islam supreme. 

&lt;i&gt;China, like most countries, has tried to deal with Muslim terrorism as a local problem, while allying with Muslim countries internationally.
That’s the same mistake that America and Europe have made.&lt;/i&gt;

There is only one solution and it doesn&#039;t involve massively growing the size, scope, and power of the federal government as GWB, like a Dhimmicrat on steroids, did in response to 9/11, and that is banning and reversing mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage. As a matter of fact, mass Muslim immigration is really stealth and deceptive non-violent jihad for the strategic purpose of demographic conquest, as Muslims never ever migrate to infidel lands to assimilate and integrate, but instead to one day subjugate and dominate. 

As a matter of fact, in just 23 years the country of France will become a Muslim majority country, and when that happens the new Muslim majority will inevitably impose Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law, and France will cease being a democracy and morph into another Islamic totalitarian hellhole at that time. 

Indeed, jihad, is a very strategic war to ultimately make Islam supreme as opposed to willy-nilly terrorism perpetrated by a few extremists, and manifests both violently and non-violently, but like in the Cold War overall astronomically far more non-violently relative to violently. Finally, with zero Muslims living within, violent and non-violent jihad will be impossible and non-existent. 

&lt;i&gt;Until all the countries that are the victims of Muslim terrorism begin standing together, they have no hope of defeating it.&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s not terrorism. Instead, it&#039;s a very strategic jihad (holy war) to ultimately make Islam supreme, as the sole fundamental purpose of Islam is the subjugation of all religions and all infidels into Islamic totalitarianism through both violent and non-violent jihad and the eventual imposition of Sharia (Islamic totalitarian law) in order to make Islam supreme. Therefore, all Muslims as long as Islam continues to exist are our eternal mortal enemies. 

Thus, all infidel countries, including the infidel state of Israel, should all stand together to simultaneously ban and reverse mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage, to deprive the forces of Islam valuable resources through the confiscation of the Mid-East oilfields, to eradicate the ruling Mullah regime of Iran and their nuclear weapons program, to destroy the Pakistani nuclear weapons arsenal and nuclear weapons program, and finally to render the Islamic world into abject poverty and then totally isolate it until such time as Islam as a force becomes discredited.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>China has predictably fallen into censorship mode, but it’s obvious that its leaders are being forced to come to terms with the fact that they may be facing a terrorist campaign similar to the one experienced in Europe, America, Israel and other parts of the world where Muslim minorities backed by foreign interests cause violent mischief.</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s about as idiotic an analogy as it gets. Muslims aren&#8217;t perpetrating terrorism in Europe, America, Israel, and now also China in response to provocations, or imperialism, or interventions, or because of a tiny minority of extremists, or to make mischief. Instead, Muslims are waging jihad (holy war) around the world to eventually subjugate into Islamic totalitarianism all religions and all infidels via the imposition of Sharia (Islamic totalitarian law) to ultimately make Islam supreme. This is a very strategic war as opposed to just terrorism and this war manifests both violently and non-violently, but overall astronomically far more non-violently relative to violently. As a matter of fact, the OIC&#8217;s worldwide campaign to outlaw speaking the truth about Islam because according to them it&#8217;s Islamophobia is an example of non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad, while this China attack, on the other hand, is an example of violent jihad. Both violent and non-violent tactics are part of the same very strategic jihad (holy war) intended to ultimately make Islam supreme. </p>
<p><i>China, like most countries, has tried to deal with Muslim terrorism as a local problem, while allying with Muslim countries internationally.<br />
That’s the same mistake that America and Europe have made.</i></p>
<p>There is only one solution and it doesn&#8217;t involve massively growing the size, scope, and power of the federal government as GWB, like a Dhimmicrat on steroids, did in response to 9/11, and that is banning and reversing mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage. As a matter of fact, mass Muslim immigration is really stealth and deceptive non-violent jihad for the strategic purpose of demographic conquest, as Muslims never ever migrate to infidel lands to assimilate and integrate, but instead to one day subjugate and dominate. </p>
<p>As a matter of fact, in just 23 years the country of France will become a Muslim majority country, and when that happens the new Muslim majority will inevitably impose Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law, and France will cease being a democracy and morph into another Islamic totalitarian hellhole at that time. </p>
<p>Indeed, jihad, is a very strategic war to ultimately make Islam supreme as opposed to willy-nilly terrorism perpetrated by a few extremists, and manifests both violently and non-violently, but like in the Cold War overall astronomically far more non-violently relative to violently. Finally, with zero Muslims living within, violent and non-violent jihad will be impossible and non-existent. </p>
<p><i>Until all the countries that are the victims of Muslim terrorism begin standing together, they have no hope of defeating it.</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not terrorism. Instead, it&#8217;s a very strategic jihad (holy war) to ultimately make Islam supreme, as the sole fundamental purpose of Islam is the subjugation of all religions and all infidels into Islamic totalitarianism through both violent and non-violent jihad and the eventual imposition of Sharia (Islamic totalitarian law) in order to make Islam supreme. Therefore, all Muslims as long as Islam continues to exist are our eternal mortal enemies. </p>
<p>Thus, all infidel countries, including the infidel state of Israel, should all stand together to simultaneously ban and reverse mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage, to deprive the forces of Islam valuable resources through the confiscation of the Mid-East oilfields, to eradicate the ruling Mullah regime of Iran and their nuclear weapons program, to destroy the Pakistani nuclear weapons arsenal and nuclear weapons program, and finally to render the Islamic world into abject poverty and then totally isolate it until such time as Islam as a force becomes discredited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: defcon 4</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[defcon 4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 01:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NatGeo has been whitewashing islam0nazism for decades. Their meme was and is that islam had nothing to do w/the terrorism Israel has experienced for 65 years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NatGeo has been whitewashing islam0nazism for decades. Their meme was and is that islam had nothing to do w/the terrorism Israel has experienced for 65 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 01:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regardless of who did it, China does not deal lightly with terrorists. They wont be getting halal meals in jail, that&#039;s for damn sure. Sad though if it was a pro democratic group.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of who did it, China does not deal lightly with terrorists. They wont be getting halal meals in jail, that&#8217;s for damn sure. Sad though if it was a pro democratic group.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheOrdinaryMan</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301594</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheOrdinaryMan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Jihadists wage a concerted campaign to subjugate China, they&#039;ll find they&#039;ve bitten off more than they can chew. The Chinese don&#039;t care about notions of political correctness; their pushback will be that much harder...and they&#039;ll just dump the dead Jihadists in the Yangtze river...where they&#039;ll float...forever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Jihadists wage a concerted campaign to subjugate China, they&#8217;ll find they&#8217;ve bitten off more than they can chew. The Chinese don&#8217;t care about notions of political correctness; their pushback will be that much harder&#8230;and they&#8217;ll just dump the dead Jihadists in the Yangtze river&#8230;where they&#8217;ll float&#8230;forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antioli</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[antioli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many fifth columnists does the Jihad have in China?


They have a lot in our country.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many fifth columnists does the Jihad have in China?</p>
<p>They have a lot in our country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakareh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jakareh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whatever else happens, this will end with Uyghur Muslim &quot;refugees&quot;, more accurately called settler-jihadists, coming to America and Europe and not to any of 57 Muslim countries throughout the world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever else happens, this will end with Uyghur Muslim &#8220;refugees&#8221;, more accurately called settler-jihadists, coming to America and Europe and not to any of 57 Muslim countries throughout the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate5778b</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301516</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kate5778b]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember the Uighur Muslims kicking off in 2009 and the Han Chinese seen as the perpetrators of violence, the sympathy was only for the Uighurs and not the Han Chinese who had the most casualties, who are er.....Chinese and trying to live a Chinese life and and keep peace in.....China.  I even remember in National Geographic article at that time showing the bad Han Chinese building on land Uighurs considered theirs.............hmmm, now what does that sound like? They&#039;re all tarred with the same brush.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember the Uighur Muslims kicking off in 2009 and the Han Chinese seen as the perpetrators of violence, the sympathy was only for the Uighurs and not the Han Chinese who had the most casualties, who are er&#8230;..Chinese and trying to live a Chinese life and and keep peace in&#8230;..China.  I even remember in National Geographic article at that time showing the bad Han Chinese building on land Uighurs considered theirs&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.hmmm, now what does that sound like? They&#8217;re all tarred with the same brush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N. Wasse</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[N. Wasse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh yes and that despicable woman Rebiya Kadeer who lives the good life in Washington by supporting the terrorist and Arab wannabes the Uighurs]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes and that despicable woman Rebiya Kadeer who lives the good life in Washington by supporting the terrorist and Arab wannabes the Uighurs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tagalog</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/did-china-get-its-september-11/comment-page-1/#comment-5301498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tagalog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=209002#comment-5301498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, those pro-democracy terrorists, they&#039;ve been a real thorn in the side of the Red Chinese.

All those subversives in the lao gai.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, those pro-democracy terrorists, they&#8217;ve been a real thorn in the side of the Red Chinese.</p>
<p>All those subversives in the lao gai.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 705/732 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 03:50:24 by W3 Total Cache -->