<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Gay Rights Trump the First Amendment?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 15:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hardy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5397108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Hardy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5397108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[in this thread...  you are implying that if someone is not ok with someone who is homosexual, they have a phobia and are afraid of homosexuals.  Maybe panic attacks ensure..  who knows.  and it is obviously &quot;uncool&quot;.  I would imagine that if the poster simply doesnt care for homosexuality and doesnt treat that person any differently, then there isnt an issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in this thread&#8230;  you are implying that if someone is not ok with someone who is homosexual, they have a phobia and are afraid of homosexuals.  Maybe panic attacks ensure..  who knows.  and it is obviously &#8220;uncool&#8221;.  I would imagine that if the poster simply doesnt care for homosexuality and doesnt treat that person any differently, then there isnt an issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hardy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5397104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Hardy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5397104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[are you basically saying that if someone doesnt accept a left side ideology that they are bigots or right wing extremists?  Based of multiple studies NOT put together by either the far right or far left, the main stream opinion is that gay marriage is NOT acceptable.  So in your humble opinion, then middle of the road people are &quot;extremist&quot; but the 5% is mainstream? And as for the irrelevant math point..  7,000,000,000 * 84% is actually 5,880,000,000 as I stated...  you might want to invest in a newer calculator.  You can also google the word calculator and one will show up for you to use.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you basically saying that if someone doesnt accept a left side ideology that they are bigots or right wing extremists?  Based of multiple studies NOT put together by either the far right or far left, the main stream opinion is that gay marriage is NOT acceptable.  So in your humble opinion, then middle of the road people are &#8220;extremist&#8221; but the 5% is mainstream? And as for the irrelevant math point..  7,000,000,000 * 84% is actually 5,880,000,000 as I stated&#8230;  you might want to invest in a newer calculator.  You can also google the word calculator and one will show up for you to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hardy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5397089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Hardy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 14:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5397089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As someone who defends your very ability to express your rights, I would say it is more mine than yours.  My personal beliefs are that if you want to be gay, I dont care.  if you want to marry another guy or girl, I dont care.  I have a gay brother, one of my best friends is a lesbian.  I could care less about anyones choices.  But just name it what it is.  A CHOICE!!  You dont get to bend the rules and laws to fit your CHOICE.  I am in no way a right wing anything.  I am nonreligious and havent been in a church in about 15 years.  You only counter what I say with an ill formed opinion which as usual states zero facts (leftist play #32) and if there would be a fact there, I am sure it would come straight from wikipedia.  In your universe the opinion of the very few trumps the wants or rights of everyone else.  there are already plenty of nations that are set up just as you would like them to be.  One is right north of us.  Feel free to move there.  You believe in the typical, because you FEEL something, that makes it true.  It doesnt.  It yours and tiny percent of the worlds populations opinion of how things should be.  Your side just happens to be louder than the majority.  Yelling louder than someone else doesn&#039;t make you right.  It just makes you the asshole in the room.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who defends your very ability to express your rights, I would say it is more mine than yours.  My personal beliefs are that if you want to be gay, I dont care.  if you want to marry another guy or girl, I dont care.  I have a gay brother, one of my best friends is a lesbian.  I could care less about anyones choices.  But just name it what it is.  A CHOICE!!  You dont get to bend the rules and laws to fit your CHOICE.  I am in no way a right wing anything.  I am nonreligious and havent been in a church in about 15 years.  You only counter what I say with an ill formed opinion which as usual states zero facts (leftist play #32) and if there would be a fact there, I am sure it would come straight from wikipedia.  In your universe the opinion of the very few trumps the wants or rights of everyone else.  there are already plenty of nations that are set up just as you would like them to be.  One is right north of us.  Feel free to move there.  You believe in the typical, because you FEEL something, that makes it true.  It doesnt.  It yours and tiny percent of the worlds populations opinion of how things should be.  Your side just happens to be louder than the majority.  Yelling louder than someone else doesn&#8217;t make you right.  It just makes you the asshole in the room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hardy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5397078</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Hardy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5397078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[my writing skills are not relevant to the conversation and your mention of them would be the standard moronic attempt to take the conversation in another direction.  Leftist play #76.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my writing skills are not relevant to the conversation and your mention of them would be the standard moronic attempt to take the conversation in another direction.  Leftist play #76.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5376489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5376489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;This goes back to JFK’s invention of a right to be served anywhere 
leading to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. While people should be served 
everywhere equally, there is no such right, nor does government have the
 right to compel such a thing.&quot;

Actually, what the Civil Rights Act of 1964 says is that you can&#039;t be denied service on the basis of your race, gender, national origin, etc.  It does not say you have a &quot;right to be served anywhere&quot;, it says you have a right not to be *refused* service because of racism, sexism, etc.  There is a difference.  Businesses can still refuse service to individuals for plenty of reasons, just not those.

Also, government clearly has the right to compel businesses not to discriminate.  It&#039;s exercised that right for decades.  So do all 50 states.  Each of them now has state anti-discrimination laws which mirror the Civil Rights Act in this regard.

Where does the First Amendment provide the freedom to operate a business in whatever manner you choose?  It doesn&#039;t.  Businesses are legal entities, they are and always have been required to comply with various state and federal laws and regulations, and unlike individuals, they cannot have religious beliefs or biases, because *they are legal entities and not people*.

Professional artists have First Amendment rights.  They are permitted to create what they wish and their expression is not being censored in any way, shape, or form.  They can go on and on all they want about how much they don&#039;t like homosexuals or approve of gay marriage, if they want.  No law is stopping them from doing so.  But if they *hold themselves out as providing commercial services*, they can&#039;t *refuse to provide those commercial services to only some people*.  If someone advertises themselves as a &quot;wedding photographer&quot; available for hire, then anyone should be able to hire them to produce &quot;wedding photographs&quot;.  It doesn&#039;t matter if they&#039;re white, black, interracial, straight, gay, whatever.  There is a huge difference between a person saying what you disapprove of, and the *actions* taken by a *business* to advertise services and then refuse to provide them to only some individuals based on discrimination.  What you&#039;re talking about has nothing to do with speech at all, really.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This goes back to JFK’s invention of a right to be served anywhere<br />
leading to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. While people should be served<br />
everywhere equally, there is no such right, nor does government have the<br />
 right to compel such a thing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, what the Civil Rights Act of 1964 says is that you can&#8217;t be denied service on the basis of your race, gender, national origin, etc.  It does not say you have a &#8220;right to be served anywhere&#8221;, it says you have a right not to be *refused* service because of racism, sexism, etc.  There is a difference.  Businesses can still refuse service to individuals for plenty of reasons, just not those.</p>
<p>Also, government clearly has the right to compel businesses not to discriminate.  It&#8217;s exercised that right for decades.  So do all 50 states.  Each of them now has state anti-discrimination laws which mirror the Civil Rights Act in this regard.</p>
<p>Where does the First Amendment provide the freedom to operate a business in whatever manner you choose?  It doesn&#8217;t.  Businesses are legal entities, they are and always have been required to comply with various state and federal laws and regulations, and unlike individuals, they cannot have religious beliefs or biases, because *they are legal entities and not people*.</p>
<p>Professional artists have First Amendment rights.  They are permitted to create what they wish and their expression is not being censored in any way, shape, or form.  They can go on and on all they want about how much they don&#8217;t like homosexuals or approve of gay marriage, if they want.  No law is stopping them from doing so.  But if they *hold themselves out as providing commercial services*, they can&#8217;t *refuse to provide those commercial services to only some people*.  If someone advertises themselves as a &#8220;wedding photographer&#8221; available for hire, then anyone should be able to hire them to produce &#8220;wedding photographs&#8221;.  It doesn&#8217;t matter if they&#8217;re white, black, interracial, straight, gay, whatever.  There is a huge difference between a person saying what you disapprove of, and the *actions* taken by a *business* to advertise services and then refuse to provide them to only some individuals based on discrimination.  What you&#8217;re talking about has nothing to do with speech at all, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parque_Hundido</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5371085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parque_Hundido]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5371085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, may is suggest you work on your writing skills? The above screed is barely legible to English speakers. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, may is suggest you work on your writing skills? The above screed is barely legible to English speakers. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parque_Hundido</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5371077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parque_Hundido]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5371077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one cares about what you accept or reject. It is your right to choose the behavior of a right wing religious extremist even if I categorically reject all of your ideas. Our Constitution matters more than your claims based on your poor math skills and your misunderstanding of evolution.  Sorry you find that objectionable. This is my country. If you can&#039;t accept that, there are alternatives. Consider them. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one cares about what you accept or reject. It is your right to choose the behavior of a right wing religious extremist even if I categorically reject all of your ideas. Our Constitution matters more than your claims based on your poor math skills and your misunderstanding of evolution.  Sorry you find that objectionable. This is my country. If you can&#8217;t accept that, there are alternatives. Consider them. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hardy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5370974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Hardy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 06:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5370974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[with 84% of the world being religious, you are basically saying that you are &quot;enlightened&quot; and one of the only smart people on the planet.  The rest of the 5,880,000,000 are just idiots and only you and your cohorts have the real answers which is basically based off of you guys mantra &quot;if it feels good, do it&quot;.  The basis for human life and any life on teh planet has one primary purpose and one biological purpopse only, which is to continue the species.  Homosexual&#039;s are an aboration of this fact.  In the animal kingdom this trait would be lost be being bred out of the populations because a homosexual tendency in genetics could not be continued on in the bloodline.  There is not one factual study that says homosexuality is genetic or a &quot;born with behavior&quot;  just empherical evidence that can be interpreted either way and usually by marginal scientists at best.  Even they wont 100% ascribe to the genetic theory.  It is a choice.  If someone wants to be married to someone of the samesex, fine.  Thats their choice.  But I dont have to like it, accept it, approve of it, or anyting else just as you dont have to subscribe to someone elses belief in God, Buddah, Scientology, or the Bigfoot.  If someone doesnt want to serve you, let your money do the walking and pay someone else to do it.  If it were me I would take the fine, time in jail and sell the business along with a &quot;shove it&quot; sign on top of their wedding cake as a gift.  I dont even consider myself religious though I was raised in a VERY conservative family.  The fact that you people seem to want to FORCE your world and social views on the majority of everyone else is disgusting.  It reeks of selfrightousness and &quot;little&quot; man syndrome.  And whats worng with religion?  Liberals teach &quot;if it feels good do it&quot;, make eveyone else accept and like it, the WANTS (not needs) of the few outweight the wants and needs of everyone else.  Religion teaches acceptance, humility, family, community, others over self, compassion, etc.. Why wouldnt you want those traits in your society?  You dont.  You want our country to be a social cesspool like Europe.  I have been to Europe on multiple occasions and even they think you Liberals are idiots.  Funny how that works.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>with 84% of the world being religious, you are basically saying that you are &#8220;enlightened&#8221; and one of the only smart people on the planet.  The rest of the 5,880,000,000 are just idiots and only you and your cohorts have the real answers which is basically based off of you guys mantra &#8220;if it feels good, do it&#8221;.  The basis for human life and any life on teh planet has one primary purpose and one biological purpopse only, which is to continue the species.  Homosexual&#8217;s are an aboration of this fact.  In the animal kingdom this trait would be lost be being bred out of the populations because a homosexual tendency in genetics could not be continued on in the bloodline.  There is not one factual study that says homosexuality is genetic or a &#8220;born with behavior&#8221;  just empherical evidence that can be interpreted either way and usually by marginal scientists at best.  Even they wont 100% ascribe to the genetic theory.  It is a choice.  If someone wants to be married to someone of the samesex, fine.  Thats their choice.  But I dont have to like it, accept it, approve of it, or anyting else just as you dont have to subscribe to someone elses belief in God, Buddah, Scientology, or the Bigfoot.  If someone doesnt want to serve you, let your money do the walking and pay someone else to do it.  If it were me I would take the fine, time in jail and sell the business along with a &#8220;shove it&#8221; sign on top of their wedding cake as a gift.  I dont even consider myself religious though I was raised in a VERY conservative family.  The fact that you people seem to want to FORCE your world and social views on the majority of everyone else is disgusting.  It reeks of selfrightousness and &#8220;little&#8221; man syndrome.  And whats worng with religion?  Liberals teach &#8220;if it feels good do it&#8221;, make eveyone else accept and like it, the WANTS (not needs) of the few outweight the wants and needs of everyone else.  Religion teaches acceptance, humility, family, community, others over self, compassion, etc.. Why wouldnt you want those traits in your society?  You dont.  You want our country to be a social cesspool like Europe.  I have been to Europe on multiple occasions and even they think you Liberals are idiots.  Funny how that works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avrum</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5334341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Avrum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5334341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parque-Hundido---which apparently is Albanian for &quot;Smug Something or Other With a Bad Case of Repetition Compulsion&quot;--fails to notice (perhaps because it was admiring itself in homeroom rather than studying---is that laws are obeyed only as long as their benefits outweigh their costs.  Laws based on coercion are rarely experienced as legitimate, except by persons whose lives are clever imitations of sheep.  The rest of us---when pusged far enough---are doing to do things that the Hundido of the world will not much like.  The law is backed by force, dear, and so is resistance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parque-Hundido&#8212;which apparently is Albanian for &#8220;Smug Something or Other With a Bad Case of Repetition Compulsion&#8221;&#8211;fails to notice (perhaps because it was admiring itself in homeroom rather than studying&#8212;is that laws are obeyed only as long as their benefits outweigh their costs.  Laws based on coercion are rarely experienced as legitimate, except by persons whose lives are clever imitations of sheep.  The rest of us&#8212;when pusged far enough&#8212;are doing to do things that the Hundido of the world will not much like.  The law is backed by force, dear, and so is resistance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parque_Hundido</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5334000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parque_Hundido]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5334000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are correct, it would not matter if the photographer were an atheist. The law is blind with regard to religion: it just doesn&#039;t matter. Atheist or bible thumper, s/he cannot discriminate against people because of their sexual orientation. That&#039;s the law. There is no compulsion here except to obey the law.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct, it would not matter if the photographer were an atheist. The law is blind with regard to religion: it just doesn&#8217;t matter. Atheist or bible thumper, s/he cannot discriminate against people because of their sexual orientation. That&#8217;s the law. There is no compulsion here except to obey the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hard Little Machine</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5333981</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hard Little Machine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5333981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does the photographer have to do a stellar job or will the results if they aren&#039;t up to expectations also wind up in the court as hate crimes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the photographer have to do a stellar job or will the results if they aren&#8217;t up to expectations also wind up in the court as hate crimes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoPasaran</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5333961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NoPasaran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5333961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if the photographer were an atheist?  In other words, would THAT matter?  No.  They are being compelled to provide a service for political reasons, and you are repeating the same endless pedantries because of some sad need for affirmation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if the photographer were an atheist?  In other words, would THAT matter?  No.  They are being compelled to provide a service for political reasons, and you are repeating the same endless pedantries because of some sad need for affirmation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nottaturk</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5323609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nottaturk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 05:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5323609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite obviously you are obsessed with other peoples &quot;personal religious feelings&quot; or beliefs, and judging from this thread, you spend more time trolling for &quot;a tiny minority of ultra extremist right wing fringe&quot; to hurl your smug &quot;intellect&quot; at than what we&#039;re worth.


Your activist allies have stacked a few courtrooms with your fellows, and you claim a great victory when the rights of someone to exercise their Constitutionally delineated rights are quelled, simply because their views are based in a Constitutionally protected institution which opposes your own.  


So then, where do you find your authority to  declare your morality superior, and upon what do you base that morality?  


Remember we&#039;re not talking about homosexual marriage here, even though that is the weak point you are clinging to,  but the right of a business owner to name terms of a contract where in she may enter of her own free will. 


I await with baited breath for your condescending reply eminating from all that fiery intellect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite obviously you are obsessed with other peoples &#8220;personal religious feelings&#8221; or beliefs, and judging from this thread, you spend more time trolling for &#8220;a tiny minority of ultra extremist right wing fringe&#8221; to hurl your smug &#8220;intellect&#8221; at than what we&#8217;re worth.</p>
<p>Your activist allies have stacked a few courtrooms with your fellows, and you claim a great victory when the rights of someone to exercise their Constitutionally delineated rights are quelled, simply because their views are based in a Constitutionally protected institution which opposes your own.  </p>
<p>So then, where do you find your authority to  declare your morality superior, and upon what do you base that morality?  </p>
<p>Remember we&#8217;re not talking about homosexual marriage here, even though that is the weak point you are clinging to,  but the right of a business owner to name terms of a contract where in she may enter of her own free will. </p>
<p>I await with baited breath for your condescending reply eminating from all that fiery intellect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parque_Hundido</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5320877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parque_Hundido]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5320877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m trying to help you finish high school and avoid prison. If you&#039;re lucky, you may even learn to write a proper sentence.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to help you finish high school and avoid prison. If you&#8217;re lucky, you may even learn to write a proper sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lhfry</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5320795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lhfry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5320795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allowing homosexuals&#039; demands for &quot;special rights&quot; to be termed &quot;civil rights&quot; was the first mistake.   All future arguments about their demands are then on their turf. 
I&#039;m still waiting for someone to tell me which civil rights homosexuals have been denied.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allowing homosexuals&#8217; demands for &#8220;special rights&#8221; to be termed &#8220;civil rights&#8221; was the first mistake.   All future arguments about their demands are then on their turf.<br />
I&#8217;m still waiting for someone to tell me which civil rights homosexuals have been denied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parque_Hundido</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5320717</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parque_Hundido]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 06:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5320717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poor thing, you&#039;re just mad that the court decision didn&#039;t turn out as you would have liked. It&#039;s a sign of maturity to recognize that things aren&#039;t always as you&#039;d like! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor thing, you&#8217;re just mad that the court decision didn&#8217;t turn out as you would have liked. It&#8217;s a sign of maturity to recognize that things aren&#8217;t always as you&#8217;d like! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5320716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 06:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5320716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I take it you&#039;re pointing me in this direction:


http://www.gurleyauctions.com/images/030109germanuniform4.jpg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it you&#8217;re pointing me in this direction:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gurleyauctions.com/images/030109germanuniform4.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.gurleyauctions.com/images/030109germanuniform4.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parque_Hundido</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5320712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parque_Hundido]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 06:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5320712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[School uniforms would be best for you. Certainly better than the prison orange you&#039;ll wear if you don&#039;t stick to your studies and finish high school! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>School uniforms would be best for you. Certainly better than the prison orange you&#8217;ll wear if you don&#8217;t stick to your studies and finish high school! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parque_Hundido</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5320711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parque_Hundido]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 06:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5320711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wouldn&#039;t it be better if you studied harder and learned to write? Otherwise, people like you end up wearing prison orange. Sorry to be so blunt, but I think you already know this. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be better if you studied harder and learned to write? Otherwise, people like you end up wearing prison orange. Sorry to be so blunt, but I think you already know this. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parque_Hundido</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/do-gay-rights-trump-the-first-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-5320709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parque_Hundido]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2013 06:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=211560#comment-5320709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel, with that attitude you&#039;re never going to be a journalist. You need to be open to constructive criticism in order to move beyond this type of article. I know it sounds harsh, but this piece is amateurish and comes across as juvenile. Sorry to be so blunt, but it&#039;s not like you haven&#039;t heard this before. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, with that attitude you&#8217;re never going to be a journalist. You need to be open to constructive criticism in order to move beyond this type of article. I know it sounds harsh, but this piece is amateurish and comes across as juvenile. Sorry to be so blunt, but it&#8217;s not like you haven&#8217;t heard this before. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 811/934 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 10:37:13 by W3 Total Cache -->