Fort Hood Terrorist Calls Himself an Islamic Holy Warrior in Opening Statement

Nidal-Hasan_2636090k

Nidal Hassan, the Fort Hood terrorist, is making it really hard for Obama Inc. to stick to its claim that the Fort Hood Massacre was workplace violence. And that will make it easier for the families to sue Obama Inc. and get justice for their loved ones.

First, Hasan’s opening statement.

The evidence will clearly show that I am the shooter,” said Hasan, who was shot by officers responding to the attack and is paralyzed from the waist down and confined to a wheelchair.

Hasan voiced his allegiance to the mujahideen – the name given to those waging holy war in Muslim countries. Hasan was scheduled to be deploy to Afghanistan the month of the shooting.

“Evidence will show I was on the wrong side of America’s war and I later switched sides,” Hasan said. “We in the mujahideen are imperfect beings trying to establish a perfect religion.”

So Hasan’s defense is that he is a terrorist.

Now let’s recall some of the bizarre lies and excuses made up by a media trying to deny Hasan’s terrorism motives. Time and the New York Times claimed that Nidal Hasan had secondary PTSD from treating US soldiers.

And here’s Obama after the Fort Hood Massacre. “‘We don’t know all the answers yet. And I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts,’ Obama said in a Rose Garden statement otherwise devoted to the economy.”

Jumping to conclusions is reserved for blaming a YouTube trailer made by a Coptic Christian after a Muslim terrorist attack. And then locking him up.

The Fort Hood report made no mention of Islam. Nidal Hasan can’t stop talking about Islam, but somehow the report did not find it pertinent.

Now Hasan has come out and said that he’s a Mujahideen, an Islamic holy warrior, the Soldier of Allah acronym that he put on his business cards while still in the military. And the media will shake its head, say it’s bizarre and go back to ignoring the terrorist’s own testimony.

  • Judahlevi

    Trying to create a “perfect religion” by murdering people in cold blood.

    If to create a perfect Islam, all infidels need to be eliminated/killed, then we know everything we need to know about this religion of peace.

    Where are the mullahs coming out to denounce this type of talk? Nothing but silence from his fellow Muslims in the US. That silence says much more than some would want us to know.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      “Trying to create a “perfect religion” by murdering people in cold blood.”

      Who are we to judge another religion? They’ll evolve. They need more time and more leftist TLC.

    • Edward

      How about socialists, “progressives”, “anti-war” frauds, CAIR, imams, sheiks, mullahs denouncing his type of talk?

  • Marridge

    Do NOT give him the death penalty because that will make him a martyr. Better to let him suffer in prison for the rest of his miserable islamic life.

    • ziggy zoggy

      Wrong. He would become a hostage exchange for terrorists. He should be sodomized to death by pigs.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        He would become a hostage exchange for terrorists.

        Muslims aren’t terrorists, as jihad, in stark contrast to terrorism is holy fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam and is only waged by Muslims. Meanwhile, terrorism, on the other hand, is perpetrated for all kinds of various political reasons and is a product of all societies and all cultures. Not to mention also that terrorism is always and only violent, while jihad, on the other hand, manifest both violently and non-violently, but astronomically far more non-violently relative to violently. However, because what is really jihad gets conflated as being terrorism all the time, the many various forms of non-violent jihad manifest throughout the West for the most part unopposed because if it isn’t perceived as being violent, then it isn’t perceived as being terrorism, and if it isn’t perceived as being terrorism, then it isn’t opposed. Nonetheless, non-violent jihad is far more detrimental to our future security relative to violent jihad.

        Indeed, conflating what is really jihad as somehow being terrorism is one of the biggest strategic blunders this country’s leadership and government makes. As a matter of fact, between AQ and the OIC, the OIC is far more powerful and dangerous than AQ and far more detrimental to the West’s security, as the OIC is one of the most powerful stealth and deceptive jihadists organizations in the world. Nevertheless, because the OIC doesn’t unleash violence, it isn’t recognized as a threat, but nevertheless it is.

        • Edward

          Not all Muslims are terrorists,

          but most terrorists ARE Muslims.

          This islamofascism problem needs to be solved by the hundreds of millions of Good Muslims.

          • Major

            They’re non existent…as demonstrated by the last 11 years of not having participated in a “million muslim march” on DC waving American flags and singing God Bless America.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Not all Muslims are terrorists, but most terrorists ARE Muslims.

            Actually, Muslims aren’t terrorists at all. Instead they are jihadists, as jihad, in stark contrast to terrorism, is holy fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam. Also, in stark contrast to terrorism, jihad manifests both violently and non-violently, but astronomically far more non-violently relative to violently. While terrorism, on the other hand, is always and only violent. Furthermore, jihad is waged by Muslims alone, while terrorism, on the other hand, is the product of all cultures and societies.

            However, the non-violent varieties of jihad, such as mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest, manifest totally unopposed today throughout the West because people like you have been inculcated by mass media to conflate what is really jihad as somehow being terrorism, which is always and only violent. Thus, if it isn’t construed as being violent, it then isn’t perceived as being terrorism, and therefore it goes unopposed. Nevertheless, it is far more detrimental to the security of the West than violent jihad, as in the next 30 to 50 years, for instance, several Euroloon countries will inevitably morph into Islamic totalitarian states via demographic conquest through mass Muslim immigration, which in reality is really stealth non-violent jihad for the establishment of Islam via demographic conquest, which unfortunately again is ignored because it isn’t construed as being terrorism since it isn’t violent. Thus, it idiotically goes unopposed.

            This islamofascism problem needs to be solved by the hundreds of millions of Good Muslims.

            I hate to rain on your incredibly naive parade, but there is no such thing as so-called moderate Muslims or otherwise “good Muslims,” for that matter, as the first and foremost prerequisite of Islam is the total, complete, and unconditional submission to the will of Allah under the pain of death for blasphemy and apostasy. Furthermore, the will of Allah that all Muslims totally, completely, and unconditionally submit to under the pain of death for blasphemy and apostasy in essence is Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law.

            Now for a person of Islamic persuasion to be considered a true moderate in the Western sense of the word, that person would necessarily have to disavow Sharia, which simultaneously would turn them into blasphemous apostates and earn them a death pealty in the process. In effect, they would also cease being Muslims the instant they disavowed Sharia. Hence, your assertion that the hundreds of millions of “Good Muslims” must solve the Islamofascism problem is little more than a fantasy based myth.

            Not to mention that jihad is the highest pillar of Islam and also a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims in one form or another. Thus, all Muslims are jihadists in one form or another. Otherwise, again they are blasphemous apostates that per the texts and tenets of Islam must be executed.

            By the way, what Abrahamic and non-Abrahamic religions compel faith under the penalty of death for blasphemy and apostasy the same way only Islam does? The answer, of course, is none of them, proving unequivocally that Islam is not a religion but a cult instead posing as being a religion to dupe its intended victims. Additionally, because the will of Allah that all Muslims totally, completely, and unconditionally submit to under the pain of death for blasphemy and apostasy in essence is Sharia, otherwise known as Islamic totalitarian law, Islam in reality is a very aggressive and destructive totalitarian cult that has as its sole fundamental purpose the subjugation of all religions and all infidels into Islamic totalitarianism via jihad and through the imposition of Sharia, which again is Islamic totalitarian law.

        • ziggy zoggy

          You’re right but terrorism is just a tactic. Anybody who does it is by definition a terrorist. Still waiting for the day we all start calling them muslims and start calling their fake religion islam instead extremist islam, etc. Probably wont happen anytime soon, the way this country has become under the jihadi in chief. Another reason to hate the terrorist tag is because itt implies they inspire terror. They don’t. Just hatred and contempt. Nobody is afraid of those pu$$ies.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            You’re right but terrorism is just a tactic. Anybody who does it is by definition a terrorist.

            It may be a tactic, but it isn’t an Islamic one, as Muslims aren’t reacting to America being a bully nation (if you are a libertarian) or out of poverty and despair (if you are a delusional leftist). Jihad is not only the highest pillar of Islam; it is also a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims in one form or another. Thus, Muslims are preemptively waging jihad in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam via the imposition of Sharia in fulfillment of this holy obligation. Indeed, the sole fundamental purpose of Islam is the subjugation of all religions and all infidels into Islamic totalitarianism via the imposition of Sharia, which is Islamic totalitarian law.

    • Major

      Yea….like he’s “suffering” now in prison? Get real…this animal, jihadist POS deserves to hunt for rats to stay alive each day.

  • http://www.clarespark.com/ Clare Spark

    The Fort Hood massacre reminded me that I knew nothing about military psychiatry, and it is as scary as you might imagine. See http://clarespark.com/2010/04/22/links-to-blogs-on-military-psychiatry/. “…blogs on military psychiatry.” I especially recommend the one on NCIS, that establishes that we should be happy to equate Islam with Christianity and Judaism as just another religion that is to be “tolerated.”

  • Conniption Fitz

    There is no such thing as an Islamic Holy Warrior here.
    Islamic jihad is not recognized or valid in the USA.
    Hasan is a mass murderer. He violated his oath of military duty and of US citizenship and should be executed as soon as possible.
    Period.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      Yeah but…multiculturalism.

      There you go.

  • georgejochnowitz

    There is no way the murders committed by Nidal Hassan could have helped Islam. Similarly, there is no way that the 3,000 deaths caused by the 9/11 pilots could have helped Islam. What they did was evil. It was also idiotic. Terrorism is not simply murderous; it is also pointless. Nothing is stupider than jihad.

    http://www.jochnowitz.net/Essays/The-Boston-Bombers.html

    • ziggy zoggy

      Jock Itch, Al Qaeda is now a franchise with more members than ever. Islamopithecines around the world are inspired by Hasan. Are ever right about anyting?

    • Veracious_one

      There is no way the murders committed by Nidal Hassan could have helped Islam
      You don’ t know much about Islam…do you?…..Every single one of the Muslim terrorists have said they killed for Islam…How could all these Muslims misunderstand their peaceful religion of Islam in exactly the same way?

  • ziggy zoggy

    I guess Hasan still doesn’t follow orders. His islamophile Commander in Chief has ordered that islamic jihad be referred to as workplace violence. If he isn’t more careful, he might get audited by the IRS.

  • Major

    Please please…pick me….I’ll supply the bullets you cowards are not going to use against this animal.

    • BS77

      Back in FDR’s day, this vermin would have been summarily tried and hanged within weeks.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    All Muslims are holy warriors in one form or another, as jihad is not only the highest pillar of Islam, it is also a fundamental holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims in one form or another. Hasan just elected to do the violent variety as opposed to the stealth and deceptive variety, as the vast overwhelming majority of them elect to do.

  • objectivefactsmatter

    Here is how the leftists will spin it:

    He had civilization dysphoria. He was a legitimate Islamic soldier trapped in the body of a US soldier because of his CDS.

    And he had legitimate grievances because we all know that Muslims are victims. Those them there are just the facts.

  • Mario
    • ObamaYoMoma

      What Abrahamic and non-Abrahamic religions compel faith under the penalty of death for blasphemy and apostasy the same way only Islam does? The answer, of course, is none of them, proving unequivocally that Islam is not a religion but a cult instead posing as being a religion to dupe its intended victims. Additionally, because the will of Allah that all Muslims totally, completely, and unconditionally submit to under the pain of death for blasphemy and apostasy in essence is Sharia, otherwise known as Islamic totalitarian law, Islam in reality is a very aggressive and destructive totalitarian cult that has as its sole fundamental purpose the subjugation of all religions and all infidels into Islamic totalitarianism via jihad and through the imposition of Sharia, which again is Islamic totalitarian law.

      Apparently, you are one of those low information voters that Rush is always telling us about.