Fort Hood Terrorist Hasan Blames US Refusal to Accept Islamic Sharia Law

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.


nidal_hasan_AP979385677033_fullwidth_620x350

Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood Shooter, has released a statement claiming that the US is participating in a War on Islam. How does Hasan define this war?

“My complicity was on behalf of a government that openly acknowledges that it would hate for the law of Almighty Allah to be the supreme law of the land,” the 42-year-old Army psychiatrist said. Hasan then apparently asked if this was a war on Islam. “You bet it is,” he said. “I participated in it.”

I don’t recall any US government having the guts to say that they don’t want their country run under a system of jurisprudence that treats women like animals and non-Muslims like second-class citizens. But in Hasan’s mind the mere refusal to implement Islamic Law is already a War on Islam.

That is the logic of the Islamist.

Or as Mohammed put it, “Aslim, Taslam”. Either you accept Islam or we are in a state of war.

George Stratton and his son — who was wounded in the attack — will both testify at the trial.  Stratton told Fox News he is not surprised by the statement.

“I have all along believed Nidal Hasan to be a Muslim terrorist, so it confirms what I’ve always thought,” Stratton said. “I believe that’s exactly how he felt when he did what he did. We should take him at his word.”

Lawyer Neal Sher, who represents Fort Hood shooting victims and their families in a separate legal action, said “This is yet further confirmation of a fact that everyone knows except our government. That is, the Fort Hood shooting was a terrorist jihadi attack.”

Obama however refuses to acknowledge it. Or allow the wounded soldiers to be honored for their service. Because it would prejudice the case against Hasan, who cheerfully admits what Hussein will not, that he is an Islamic terrorist who murdered Americans in Islam’s name.

 

  • Veracious_one

    This should get more press coverage than it does…Obamas words and policies indicate he may indeed be a Muslim….

  • NAHALKIDES

    Obama will never admit that Hasan is an Islamic terrorist because the whole Left is trying to pretend there is no such thing. They’re wedded to the fiction that Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. Here’s a test for prospective Republican Presidential candidates: what motivated Hasan to murder his fellow soldiers? Any answer other than “Islam” disqualifies you from deserving our support.

  • Infovoyeur

    So because we don’t slavishly submit, we are aggressively starting a war, and the shooter was not aggressing but merely defending? I have indeed heard it told, that in some cultures totally non-logical contradictions make sense to them. Well, a lesson in a kind of multi-cultural diversity I guess…..

    • objectivefactsmatter

      “So because we don’t slavishly submit, we are aggressively starting a war, and the shooter was not aggressing but merely defending? ”

      Yup. That’s Islamic justice.

  • DevilsTrumpet

    Meanwhile Hasan keeps collecting his taxpayer-paid paycheck and has amassed three hundred grand while in custody.
    Obama refuses to admit that this was a terrorist attack,that would be counter to the left’s narrative that the west is responsible for all the ills of Muslims,he holds out an olive branch as they take their sabres to it.

    • Edward

      And Holder too.

      The fish stinks from the head – Oval Office.

  • Ross A Lloyd

    OK, that’s plenty thanks. Time for the firing squad & stand his mate Obama next to him…

  • Roger

    While pretending to be a psychiatrist in the Army, Hasan heard a lot of his soldier patients tell him about their combat experiences. Instead of treating them, he PUT IN REQUESTS TO HAVE THEM PROSECUTED FOR “WAR CRIMES!” And instead of busting this jihadist bum out of the Army, they promoted him from captain to major… Forget this colostomy-bag wearin POS, I want to see all the soldiers and officers who enabled him court martialed, and Obama IMPEACHED!
    JUST SAY NO! DEATH TO PC BS!!

    • Edward

      The military brass who know of hasans islamism, and didn’t take precautions to prevent “Sudden Jihad Syndrome” are culpable in the murders – Dereliction of Duty.

      All the warning signs were there, but PC trumps sanity.

  • Lito Young

    There is no such thing as a good Muslim doing good to non-Muslim. A good Muslim is a faithful one killing non-believers. If one says he is a Muslim and respect other religion, then he or she is a bad Muslim, because the Koran instructs every Muslim to kill non-believers in the name of Allah. If someone calls himself a Muslim and does not kill non-believers then he is an apostate. The Europe and America is for non-Muslim. Killing a Muslim is not a crime but a favor to given to them – was there any better than giving a Muslim the best place anyone can think of and FUCK SEVENTY TWO VIRGINS?

  • ObamaYoMoma

    By the way, for those of you who don’t know, Sharia is Islamic totalitarian law. Indeed, the word “totalitarian” should always be used synonymously every time the word Sharia is used, because most people don’t understand that Sharia is totalitarian. Additionally, it was the Bush State Department that acquiesced in Iraq and Afghanistan to allowing Sharia to be enshrined in each country’s respective constitutions. Not to mention also that the only freedom that Sharia makes allowance for is the freedom for Muslims to strive to become more devout slaves of Allah. Hence, if you believe that Iraq and Afghanistan were somehow great American victories until Obama came along and screwed everything up, then that means you don’t have a clue. The reality is the establishment Republicans are competing with the Dhimmicrats to see which political party can be the most incompetent when it comes to Islam, and so for it’s a toss up.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    That is the logic of the Islamist.

    Nah…not really. Just like Islam makes no accommodation for so-called moderate Muslims, it also makes no accommodation for so-called Islamist, i.e., radical Muslims. Islam only makes accommodation for Muslims and all Muslims are jihadists in one form or another, but don’t tell this writer that, because he believes the vast majority of Muslims are so-called moderates. He also believes that jihad is really terrorism. Thus because non-violent jihad, which is astronomically far more prevalent relative to violent jihad, isn’t violent, it isn’t construed as being terrorism. Thus, it is free to manifest totally unopposed, even though it is just as detrimental as the violent variety of jihad in which this writer conflates as being terrorism.

  • objectivefactsmatter

    “I don’t recall any US government having the guts to say that they don’t want their country run under a system of jurisprudence that treats women like animals and non-Muslims like second-class citizens. But in Hasan’s mind the mere refusal to implement Islamic Law is already a War on Islam.”

    Well gee, he’s not the first person to notice this little attitude problem we have among certain people.

    “No sharia? Why we need to defend ourselves against this outrage!”