Hate and Fear at the Zimmerman Trial

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.


zimmerman22To order David Horowitz and John Perrazo’s pamphlet, Black Skin Privilege, click here.

As the Zimmerman prosecution continues to implode, Sanford, a Florida city with less than twenty thousand black people, is preparing for race riots.

The racial exploitation of the Trayvon Martin case, as documented in David Horowitz and John Perazzo’s Black Skin Privilege, was built on lies, and the threat of race riots is the final race card out of the many that were played incessantly throughout the case.

Daryl Parks, the Martin family attorney, has belatedly come out and said, “It’s not about racial profiling” and “We never claimed this was about race.” But that announcement comes much too late.

While the shooting was not about race, the case has become a political juggernaut that is not about what actually happened between Zimmerman and Martin, but about the guilt and violence churning through the liberal exploitation of race and racism for political power.

Cecil Smith, the new black police chief who replaced Bill Lee, the former Sanford police chief fired for not immediately hanging George Zimmerman from a tree, has been sending police officers door to door to rebuild the “trust” of the black community.

The Sanford police department is enlisting black pastors to act as “observers” in the courtroom in exchange for promising to tell their congregations not to riot if the justice system does its job.

Race riots in Sanford are highly unlikely even if Al Sharpton manages to take a break from misreading the MSNBC teleprompter. As much as liberal activists have tried to make over Trayvon Martin into the new Rodney King, Sanford isn’t Los Angeles.

But the power of the race riot, like terrorism, lies in the threat. The man who threatens a race riot is blackmailing governments and private citizens to do his bidding. The Sanford race riot stories exist to persuade jurors to save lives and avoid further violence by convicting George Zimmerman.

Ever since a local crime story went national when motivated liberal activists decided to pluck it out of the back pages and transform it into their latest teachable moment on the ubiquity of American racism, Sanford has been getting a lot of help dealing with a racial crisis that it doesn’t have.

The Justice Department, which under Eric Holder has become indistinguishable from a radical community organizing group, began interfering in the case from the start.

Last spring it sent in its secretive Community Relations Service, all but indistinguishable from a group of community organizers, to train protesters and provide liaison services for them. The so-called “Peacemakers” wear the blue windbreakers, polo shirts and dark sunglasses of Federal agents, but claim to be the “eyes and ears of the community.” Eyes and ears, but not mouths. The CRS organizers were ordered not to talk to the media about what they were doing.

While Obama has refused to allow the soldiers shot in the Fort Hood Massacre to receive medals out of concern that it might “prejudice” the case against Nidal Hasan, the Muslim terrorist who opened fire on them, he had no such hesitation when it came to calling for an investigation that would leave no stone unturned in the ruthless pursuit of George Zimmerman.

Every aspect of the case has since been investigated. And with ample preparation, the prosecution is reduced to a slow demonstration of why the case should never have been brought to trial.

Without Federal interference, the charges against Zimmerman would never have materialized, not because of race, but because the case was too ambiguous to be prosecuted. But a liberal lynch mob insisted on seeing it prosecuted anyway, not on the merits of the case, which they did not even bother studying, doing so little research that they labeled Zimmerman a white racist based on his last name alone, but to make a statement about race.

Turning the Trayvon Martin case into a statement about race, rather than a confrontation between two men, dehumanized both Zimmerman and Martin, transforming them from people into characters in a morality play about racism.

The racialization of the case led to actual racial attacks, as documented in David Horowitz and John Perazzo’s Black Skin Privilege.

“In the two months following Trayvon Martin’s death, black assailants carried out at least 14 fourteen known attacks against white victims with the idea of “avenging” the fallen youth. In East Toledo, six juveniles beat a 78-year-old white man, shouting: “This is for Trayvon … Trayvon lives, white [man]. Kill that white [man]!” In Gainesville, five blacks shouting “Trayvon!” beat a 27-year-old white man, leaving his face permanently disfigured.”

Unlike George Zimmerman’s shooting of Trayvon Martin, these attacks were clearly racially motivated, but the media didn’t swarm down on them, Obama didn’t make any emotional speeches about them and the DOJ’s best and brightest community organizers didn’t begin training protesters to agitate the crowds and stir up talk of race riots. The Zimmerman case was supposed to teach about the evils of white privilege, while these attacks could teach only about black privilege.

The American justice system is not racist, but the Department of Justice has become expert at manipulating it for racial ends, exonerating the Black Panthers for their racist voter intimidation while targeting George Zimmerman because the man he shot might have looked like Obama’s hypothetical son.

Zimmerman became a useful means of indicting the justice system as racist. And discrediting the justice system is vital because what its crime statistics have to say about the state of race relations in this country is not good news.

“They tell us that black criminals aren’t actually criminals; the true culprit is the white ‘unjust justice system’ that ‘profiles’ blacks and creates this racist illusion,” Horowitz and Perazzo write, before citing the statistics that show that the problem is not in the justice system but in the criminals who enter it.

The racialization of the Zimmerman case began in bad faith as another attempt to discredit the justice system as racist and illegitimate. Now that the justice system is drifting toward doing its job, the next phase of violent reaction and mythmaking is underway.

The race cards of black privilege can only be played so many times until the final card of violence is drawn from the deck.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • hyedenny

    “But a liberal lynch mob insisted on seeing it prosecuted anyway, not on
    the merits of the case, which they did not even bother studying…”

    YES! Including the last 2 articles from FrontPage about this case. I’m glad to finally see some clear reasoning here on this matter.

    • southwood

      Yes. The second of the 2 articles was just ridiculous wasn’t it ?

      • cjkcjk

        No, they both were!!!!

        • southwood

          I can’t remember the 1st one too well but it was pretty feeble I thought. FPM have a big fear of being thought reactionary so they throw this kind of garbage at us now and then. Man, over the Snowden affair, I thought they were about to give carte blanche to Obama to check every piece of communication in existence !

  • Jason Unwin

    Clearly it is a “show trial” and the whole event is political. Zimmerman is essentially a political prisoner.

    • MarilynA

      Actually, what we have here is the legal lynching of George Zimmerman. There is very little difference from what is being done to Zimmerman and the KKK donning it’s robes and exacting it’s version of justice. Death threats have already warned that Zimmerman and his family will never be safe if he is acquitted. The Justice Dept. needs to be spending it’s time tracking down the source of those threats and making examples of the persons responsible as a warning to others that vigilante actions are unacceptable in this country. Once the vigilante cat is out of the bag, it’s going to be hard to put it back in. In the past the white vigilantes have always won.

      • Combat Veteran Seabee

        It will never happen as holder was quoted as saying, ” I will never prosecute a white discrimination case, as they have not suffered like my people have! That there, should have him removed from office!
        Boehner, ever got balls in your life, or are you just a p**** that was demonized by bullies and you can’t handle any retribution because of your weak azz personality. You need to be gotten rid of, as a fool, a fake, and a weak ass speaker who has no backing of the American People, just the Rino’s! You are a fake azz leader who is truley a P.O.S.!

      • Major

        “The Justice Dept. needs to be spending it’s time tracking down the source of those threats…”

        Dear Marilyn…that’s mean the INJUSTICE department under Jabba Holder…would have to prosecute blacks for hate crimes…you know…”His people”?

        “In the past the white vigilantes have always won…”

        As they will again. What else do we have left….they have the rent a mobs…the Klan in Tan…the NBPP. Why do you think Obutthead’s been the best salesman for tactical weapons since WW2?

        • DebRollin

          Liked your reference to Holder as Jabba! Same thing in Chicago…in order to uphold law and order, the Left would have to arrest its own voting constituents and Black on Black Crime! The Government gave away freebies to lawless people who are not held responsible under this government.

  • Sarah

    White male calls police tells them there is a suspcious looking “black” teen. Ask if he should confront, police say no don’t we are on the way – white male ignores order gets into a fight shots teen then calls “self-defence”. And the whites are wondering why there will be race riots?

    I think what we are witnessing is de-evolution. Because that is the only thing that could explain the lack of common-sense.

    • southwood

      Why don’t you get your facts right before posting, Sarah?

      1. White HISPANIC male calls police about suspicious teen. Police ASK for race of suspect. White HISPANIC tells them.
      2 “white male ignores order”. Er, not exactly. White HISPANIC male went to find out his exact street location in order to direct the police to the scene.
      3.”gets into a fight”. This statement is so vague and dishonest. Zimmerman was suddenly confronted and attacked according to his version of events. He could not avoid “a fight” if he tried in the circumstances he found himself in. Martin was into fighting, called Z a “creepy ass cracker”.

      You are a major obfuscation specialist. Don’t ever be a witness at a trial if you have any respect for the justice system.

    • DogmaelJones1

      No, Sarah: It was the “hoodie” who objected to Zimmerman’s presence, and hassled him. Zimmerman was performing his job as as community watcher. Martin was the aggressor, not Zimmerman.

      • Harry Black

        This is the myth that you and all those other terrified FrontPage followers of non-journalist Greenfield use to justify your blame-the-victim reflex. I’m with Sarah.

        • DogmaelJones1

          Harry Black: First off, I’m not a “terrified” FrontPage “follower.” Secondly, if you think so little of Greenfield’s output, why do you read it? What would terrify me would be you censoring Greenfield. He’s one of the few honest observers of current events left in this country.

          • Harry Black

            I have no power to censor Greenfield. I believe in freedom of speech even when the speech is idiotic. But I’m appalled by the way Greenfield mangles facts as well as the prejudice that informs the work of this “journalist.”

          • objectivefactsmatter

            Because you only accept lefts-speak and leftist talking points as “objective.”

          • Harry Black

            Really OFM, if you were serious about objectivity, you would admit that objectivity is a complicated business. I would guess you can’t even begin to describe the epistemological grounds for your claims to objectivity. Indeed, your repetitive, narrow-minded rants suggest you’re “objectivity” is no different from the “objectivity” of the other blinkered right wing ideologues who inhabit these pages.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            Sir Harry,

            Don’t confuse narrow focus with a narrow mind. My narrow focus is much wider than your own narrow mind apparently. Our discussion was focused on your radical claims that I pointed out were extremely biased summaries from headlines that you referred to as facts.

            I then challenged you to quote your source. You didn’t respond to that. I quoted your source and the best you could come up with was confessing that you got your headlines from huffpost.com. And you noted that the original source was funded by politicians.

            From start to finish I challenged you to analyze your claim of institutional racism and your “fact” about jail time ratios. You refused.

            So in that context, where’s the evidence that I have a problem with objectivity? You’re simply making things up because that’s the culture you come from. If you can get other leftists to agree with you, that’s liberal objectivity.

            My standards (clearly, since I already quoted the report you when you refused to) require that I strive for maximum objectivity. That’s why I started with the executive summary that easily explains an alternative to your theory. You reacted emotionally when you reacted at all.

            I can only conclude that you have no idea what objectively is. To you and virtually all leftists, all objectivity is subjective and therefore objectivity doesn’t actually exist.

            But for those that know that it does, and who have read our conversations, they know precisely what I’m talking about.

          • Harry Black

            OFM: I have more important things to do than argue with your obsessions. Your “objectivity” fails to take into account the fact that institutional racism persists in the US because of the racist attitudes that pervade FrontPage. You see no racial bias in the courts, in voter suppression, in the way in which, for example, Republicans in North Carolina wage war against women, minorities, the unemployed, the poor. Far easier, however, to demonize leftists (“dupes” in your objective lexicon) than to take a hard–one might say “objective”–look at the world you inhabit and the politics of FrontPage. Ayn Rand–an objectivist to you, no doubt, an adolescent fantasist to many–would be proud of your “objectivism.” I deplore it as inhuman and contrary to the facts of history, culture, and society. Rave on. I have nothing more to say to you.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “Your “objectivity” fails to take into account the fact that institutional racism persists in the US because of the racist attitudes that pervade FrontPage.”

            Again showing you have no clue what objectivity is.

            “You see no racial bias in the courts, in voter suppression, in the way in which, for example, Republicans in North Carolina wage war against women, minorities, the unemployed, the poor.”

            From the moon, I just see the planet. I don’t think that the “system” is “racist.” In other words, you’re collectivist approach does more harm than good. Focus on the facts and focus on objective analysis. When you pursue justice, pursue it for those who you can show objectively have been damaged. Not racial theory, but objective analysis and evidence for each plaintiff.

            If you want to focus on objective facts, why didn’t you take any opportunity to teach about the actual research there the bogus headlines were derived from? It was a perfect opportunity to slam your point home, except that you clearly realize that the facts do not support your charge of institutional racism unless you think racism is any collective outcome that is distinct between artificially constructed social classes.

            There are different results. Racism no doubt affects some people and justice should be pursued in those individual cases. Pursuing class justice is another way of supporting class warfare. Because innocent individuals have to pay the price for the guilty, and most importantly anecdotal evidence can be used to create fake grievances that become so politicized that there is no remaining integrity in the pursuit of justice. It becomes a zero sum game where racism is even perpetuated by the supposed victim because it’s useful. It pays.

            Get rid of your hyperbolic approach. Use objective evidence when you make accusations. Every time. Or your just another tool for the racists. Just because you happen to believe in the justice of your cause doesn’t make you just. It makes you a dupe.

            “Far easier, however, to demonize leftists (“dupes” in your objective lexicon)”

            I find it useful to start with the fundamentals of where the problems originate. If you can’t accept that, we can’t have any basis for building a fact-based understanding.

            It would be like asking me to ignore the fact that Allah is a fake idea about god. Ask me to try to build an understanding with people where every definition is distorted by the worldview that Mohamed had the final word on all matters of God.

            The left believes similarly that the Bible is a fraud. They believe that the entire history of Western civilization before Darwin was corrupted by scamming Christians and Jews. If you don’t believe that, but you accept all of their theories derived from those assumptions, that’s clear evidence you are a dupe.

            Atheists and Muslims lie about the Bible and attack conservatives because as a class they are considered Bible believers.

            That’s why with idealog s like you I push so hard on forcing you to justify your ideas with facts, or admit that it’s faith-based.

            “…than to take a hard–one might say “objective”–look at the world you inhabit and the politics of FrontPage.”

            Objective facts matter more than anything else, but that doesn’t mean you can’t inject subjectivity in to the conversation. You just have to do it honestly and discern the difference. You can’t even support your collectivist claims about “institutional racism” so you rant and point fingers. I might rant, but I tie down my points with objective facts. Our conversation started with you quoting silly headlines and then you start running around offering similar rhetoric when I challenged you to investigate the data behind those headlines.

            “Ayn Rand–an objectivist to you, no doubt, an adolescent fantasist to many–would be proud of your “objectivism.””

            Whatever that has to do with this conversation, it’s hard to imagine unless your only goal is to constantly take shots at everything you can think of that I suppose is intended on distracting from your failure to support any of your positions objectively. Not once did you even come close to supporting your radical statements with objective analysis.

            “I deplore it as inhuman and contrary to the facts of history, culture, and society.”

            And you do so for purely subjective reasons. You haven’t supported a single statement with objective analysis of any kind.

            “I have nothing more to say to you.”

            Nobody is forcing you to be here, or to respond to me. I’ll say what I like. It might or not be about you in the future. You shouldn’t care so much really.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Harry Blackhole.

            When you take it up the @$$, does it hurt so good?

        • putthehammerdown

          ….just a hint ,…I hear she’s ‘real fun’ at parties.

          { Just a rumor, you understand. This is me, de-evolving…}

        • NAHALKIDES

          Harry – do you have some special knowledge of the case, unknown to the rest of us? Something that proves Zimmerman attacked Martin? So far, every piece of evidence is consistent with Martin starting the fight and injuring Zimmerman, which is sufficient by itself to require an acquittal in this case.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            Sharpton and other “community leaders” already “investigated.” That’s all he needs to know. That’s where he gets his marching orders.

          • Harry Black

            As usual OFM, you know nothing. I take “marching orders” from no one. I’ve never even said I thought Zimmerman was guilty of murder. The myth is that Zimmerman was “doing his job.” All the evidence points to the fact he was looking for trouble.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “I take “marching orders” from no one.”

            I can only judge you by what you wrote here.

            “I’ve never even said I thought Zimmerman was guilty of murder.”

            So you are slightly more reasonable than the average leftist. I sensed that already.

            “The myth is that Zimmerman was “doing his job.” All the evidence points to the fact he was looking for trouble.”

            The “fact” is that his job was to “look for trouble.” Facts and myths some times line up with reality.

            Your entire lexicon is leftist. Wait for the trial to be completed or at least quote specific evidence that you’re responding to. That makes you seem a lot more reasonable and even perhaps like someone who knows about objectivity is.

        • CowboyUp

          The person who initiated the use of force is the aggressor, and the person who force was initiated against is the victim. Y’all are the ones blaming the victim.

          I live in a shall-issue concealed carry state, with a stand your ground law, so I’m not worried about, much less terrified of, violent predators of any kind. If I’m ever terrified, it’ll be for them, not of them.

          • kikkoman

            You have every right to be terrified of the implications of the entire circus, though.

            Even if every single one of the race baiters, beginning with the Boy-King Obama, clearly states that this was indeed a perverse miscarriage of Justice (and so much more), who or what guarantees that your life, livelihood and family won’t be destroyed (which is what we’re witnessing) should you accidentally have to rely on your right to self-defense?
            You might be up against a lynch mob, and this trial has shown that its members sit firmly in every institution up to the White House.

            The next guy who shoots a black guy in self-defense might think twice about whether to call 911 or let the body disappear, and I wouldn’t blame him for that.

        • glpage

          Provide some documentation to support your statement.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            Don’t hold your breath. I tried that already with him and even provided the actual documentation for his own statements (from a leftist media headline) and he wouldn’t even acknowledge it.

          • Harry Black

            glpage and OFM–no evidence I present will ever be accepted by Frontpage true believers (who, it must be said, believe and repeat the most fantastic myths and lies). I did present documentation and you rejected it as biased. In your cloud-and-cuckoo land, evidence is credible only if conforms to your ideological presuppositions. Otherwise, it boils down to so many “leftist talking points.” But enough. Arguing with you is futile and increasingly boring. Although it’s interesting how little it takes to stir up this hornet’s nest.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “I did present documentation and you rejected it as biased.”

            The opposite is true. You presented a headline from a leftist rag, and then refused to discuss the source when I began to quote the executive summary of the report that they paraphrased.

            Quoting a headline is not really “documenting” other than “documenting” an audit trail for the source of your biased material.

            If you do not want to pursue the sources (apparently you don’t) you cited from even after I ask you to several times, that shows our respective standards for objectivity. Remember these are your original claims that you refuse to discuss. You use headlines as “evidence.”

            Please. Don’t forget huffpo also says that the Civil Rights Act has been “gutted,” so that case is closed. To leftists.

            It’s sad really. These are topics you mentioned as evidence of institutional racism, but your evidence consists purely of leftist headline spin.

            Not objective. At all.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “But enough. Arguing with you is futile and increasingly boring. Although it’s interesting how little it takes to stir up this hornet’s nest.”

            When I find people in need, it would be wrong for me to ignore if there is any chance to help. Clearly you need to figure out that your opinions are largely delusional as you present them here.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Hairy; How are the @$$ herpes? does it hurt?

        • ziggy zoggy

          Harry Black @$$, you’re with anybody who hates America.

    • Alvaro

      “White make calls police [...]. And the whites are wondering why there will be race riots?”

      I wonder, because Zimmerman is not white. And he does not become white by you or anyone else saying so.

      “I think what we are witnessing is de-evolution.”

      You are right about that. It is what happens when some people get full responsibility and few privileges (Zimmerman) and other get little responsibility and full privileges (Martin) based on the color of their faces. It is called racism.

      • tagalog

        Zimmerman is not white? You mean Spanish people are not white? I think most Europeans would give you an argument on that.

        • Alvaro

          “You mean Spanish people are not white?”

          That is a different discussion, because George Zimmerman is not Spanish. He is half white (father) and half Latino (mother).

          Even Obama has a white parent. I guess that makes him white as well..?

          • tagalog

            Well, it’s a completely different point, but to be completely honest, I don’t have a problem with calling Barack Obama white. He’s just as much white as he is black.

            We need to get away from a Nuremburg Laws type of society, where the least drop of this race or that race means you are of that race. Leave that kind of racial parsing to the liberals.

          • Alvaro

            This has little do do with drops of blood, but with identity on one side and social acceptance on the other.

            I am white, but no one can deny me calling myself black or asian if that was my identity. Still, it would be useless because blacks and asians would identify me as white regardless. So I would never be accepted as anything but white – with or without the Nürnberg Laws.

            Obama identifies himself as black, and is accepted as black by other blacks. Therefore he is black.

            In order to identify Zimmerman as white he has to identify himself as white, and he has to be accepted as white by other whites.

          • tagalog

            But your pigeonholing of Zimmerman as not a white person is entirely based on your conclusions. I don’t think I’ve seen any report on what Zimmerman thinks about race or his racial identification. His neighbors, of all sorts of racial background, seem to like him but I’ve never heard anyone say he’s Hispanic or white or whatever.

          • Alvaro
          • objectivefactsmatter

            What complicates matters is that “Hispanics” are not white when the left wants to use them as class victims but they’re white when they can be used to attack the established culture in America. Or what used to be the established culture.

            It’s dishonest and racist. Politically correct racism.

            Frankly I don’t care at all what paradigm they want to use to describe themselves. I hate when others use racial identity for political gain. It infuriates me.

            How many “colors” are there in the “official scientific” theory of racial politics? Black and white? What about brown, yellow, red, and so forth?

            That answer is that it depends on what the leftists are up to.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “In order to identify Zimmerman as white he has to identify himself as white, and he has to be accepted as white by other whites.”

            We know how it works. It’s just racist. Some racism is deemed acceptable today.

          • ltcdmward

            Isn’t the correct identification of Zimmerman’s RACE to be Caucasian?

          • tagalog

            I believe you are correct.

          • OfficialPro

            Latinos have a large portion of South American Indian in them, and last I heard, Indians of North and South America are NOT caucasian by any stretch of the imagination.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            We’re talking about politics, not objective facts.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            In this case, he’s the “perp” charged against the white collective. That’s what matters to leftists.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            I wish we could leave all racial parsing to the ash heap of history.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “Even Obama has a white parent. I guess that makes him white as well..?”

            Well how about that. This whole racism thing isn’t scientific? Who’d have guessed? You’re telling me Hitler was wrong about race?

    • GeorgeRomero

      Sarah , it looks like you have something against ‘Whites’ and ‘White male’ in paticular.Care to elborate?

    • Guy Fromage

      Actually, the skin color of the suspicious person was the last descriptive element George provided, and only after prompting from the 911 operator. If George were as skin-obsessed as you appear to be, you’d think he would have made that the first thing he told the operator.

      And knock it off with the whole “order” meme. There was no order, nor could there be. The operator is not a peace offiicer. His “order,” which was not even expressed as an imperative, was boilerplate, likely intended to enhance the safety of the caller.

      If you want to witness de-evolution, look at the calls for retributive violence by some members of the “black community.” Failure to learn from mistakes, like the riots of the past, certainly implies social regression.

    • Pete Clark

      Sarah..You are an idiot..911 operator cannot give “orders” only suggestions to keep you safe you have no legal obligation to follow! The Racist thug attacked the “cracker” for following him and got his dumb a$$ shot!!

    • CowboyUp

      Sarah, thanks for providing us with yet another example of those mentioned in the article, who don’t bother learning the facts.

    • DoubleTap45

      You have to stop listening to the falsely edited tapes from MSLSD. They said “We don’t need you to do that” which is NOT a command. Morde me!

      Ray from Bloombergia
      NRA Life

      • cjkcjk

        Not only that, but it most likely wasn’t even a law officer who told him that.

    • cjkcjk

      Gotta give you credit for accurately summing up the last two FrontPage articles on this subject.

    • defcon 4

      Um, wasn’t Trayvon beating Zimmerman’s head into the ground? Or doesn’t that fact bother you at all?

    • OfficialPro

      what I think we’re seeing is the rise of illogic as an art form practically. This is evidenced by the blacks who attack random white people and call it “justice for Trayvon”. If that’s their idea of justice, who taught it to them? The race hustlers of course. Sharpton et al should be class action sued.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      This is what happens to people who are indoctrinated to think that everyone BUT the left lies.

    • Bishop Greene

      Sarah, he wasn’t ordered to not follow, the dispatcher merely answered no, now just suppose you lived in that neighborhood and while waiting for the police, Martin broke into your home and raped you. Would you not want the neighborhood watch person to tell the police when they finally arrived that the subject broke into your home while you were sleeping and the police find him in or exiting your home? Or would you have rathered he stayed in his vehicle and didn’t see where the subject went. Martin turned around and came toward Zimmerman, had him pinned to the ground beating him, so had he killed Zimmerman instead of the other way around I must think that you would say ahhh the poor kid made a mistake, let him free. I bet your married to a non-white to defend him like you have.

    • Sarah

      I’ve accidentally wandered into a white supremacist site…oh crap.

    • ziggy zoggy

      Sorry,
      What is the only thing that could explain your stupidity? Degenerative brain herpes?

  • Alvaro

    Thanks , Daniel, for this good analysis. What I have read the last few days concerning this case on Frontpage Mag seems to have been driven by (well intended) opinions that unfortunately have collided head-on with plain facts. It is good to see the combination of facts and common sense prevail.

    The fact that this case has been stirred up to such enormous proportions, with underlying threats of violence unless a man is convicted, is a sign of something seriously wrong with society.

    If those threatening with violence showed restraint and let the justice system do its job, everyone would be better off.

    • kikkoman

      You’re missing that the Black Grievance Industry is part of the Justice system, with Obama and Holder on the top.

      Do you think the Sanford Chief of Police was fired because a few unhinged thugs were threatening a citizen with violence?

  • cedarhill

    Having read the article posted at Powerline on how the GOP can win by DH, which was excellent, perhaps DH can outline the cournterattack strategy in detail using the GZ-TM case as the jumping off point.

    Fact is, race, particularly Obama’s Black-white race, is being continually “reported” by the Left and has only increased since January. All in the build up to Nov 2014.

  • Rdlake

    They do it because we let them. Liberal media air all these race baiting guest & hosts daily. Put them both together in front of a camera, step back & let the pot roll to a boil. Once the destruction starts it makes for good TV for a week. Besides when can you burn things in public & loot @ the same time. There are many out there making their Xmas list if this happens.

    • Combat Veteran Seabee

      Take time, Take aim, you will live!

  • tagalog

    It’s somewhat interesting, in a repulsive sort of way, that if there is a Not Guilty verdict, and blacks riot over the verdict, of course that will not change the verdict.

    In fact, it will cement the verdict in stone, as no court is going to be OK with declaring a new verdict and be accused of caving in to the mob.

    So the rioting will be an act of cutting off the black community’s nose in order to spite its face. I look with a low-key concern on the likelihood that when they are finished destroying the black community, no construction company will be willing to undertake the necessary repairs due to black racism, and the burnt-out buildings in the black part of town (or towns) will continue to look like Berlin after the war for a couple of decades.

  • Infidel4Ever

    As usual, Mr. Greenfield tells it like it is. The race hustlers created this “trial” and if the truth, fairness and justice prevail, George Zimmerman will be found innocent. Then the fun starts. Will the race hustlers be held accountable for the mayhem to follow? Yeah, I know. That’s just crazy talk.

  • Matt

    “But a liberal lynch mob insisted on seeing it prosecuted anyway, not on
    the merits of the case, which they did not even bother studying,”

    Who is that liberal lynch mob?

    Why don’t you start naming names?

    • Ray Burke

      Matt, if you’re a liberal, YOU’RE a part of that “liberal lynch mob.”

      • Matt

        I’m not a liberal. I would like some names of journalists mentioned. Why should they get a free ride when throwing bombs?

        • The March Hare

          You didn’t specify journalists. You mentioned the liberal lynch mobs. Trying to back pedal?

    • Smoking Hamster

      Eric Holder and Obama…

      • glpage

        Add Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and the Congressional Black Caucus.

        • Elaine Blazosek

          don’t forget the black panthers, that little thing called a bounty placed on his head.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        “If I had a son…”

        That ranks up there with “The future must not belong to those…”

        Our class warrior POTUS. Just don’t call him a communist or a muslim.

    • The March Hare

      Apparently, you haven’t kept up with the news. You didn’t hear the Panthers put out a contract on him in public? You didn’t hear Sharpton and Jackson rile people up and demand prosecution? Methinks you are one of them.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      I hope you’re joking.

      • Matt

        “unsubscribe”

  • ricsands

    There was a man named Charles Manson who used murder and mayhem to create what his feeble mind thought would cause a “Race War”, but this administration, well they are extremely proficient at Charlie Manson’s cause, basically they are nothing more than Charlie Manson disciples.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      “…basically they are nothing more than Charlie Manson disciples.”

      It’s more accurate to say that Manson and the others are Satan’s disciples.

  • mtnhikerdude

    It is simple Liberal Politically Correct Logic … It is fine for blacks to kill whites or blacks to kill blacks . It is just not acceptable for whites to kill blacks regardless of the circumstances. The MSM will now be waiting for a white to kill a black gay.
    The ensuing trial will trump the O.J . and Zimmerman trials . We will have to endure Rainbows 24/7 . D.C. will pass a law requiring all homes to have a Rainbow decal in a street facing window . The president will declare ,”If I had a son he would
    look like a Rainbow’.

    • becky21k

      In other words, it’s expected of blacks to kill others, they don’t know any better, because they’re black. I find it absurd that the same group of people who 50 years ago demanded equality now demands special treatment because they apparently can’t live up to the same laws and standards of society as anyone else – now, they’re the ones saying they’re not as smart or as good as other races.

      Which is amusing in a dark way as well. Pun not intended.

      • mtnhikerdude

        Becky , I find it absurd that after they were awarded equality and desegregation , they segregated ….NAACP ,Black Miss America ,
        Black only Colleges , Black Caucus , Black Entertainment Television etc.
        The truth is per capita more blacks hate whites than whites hate blacks and the new racism is anti racism.

        • Dennis X

          Your an idiot .Name one Black College that does not allow white students. whites choose not to go to these schools and there’s a little racism there. You choose not to watch BET , there are whites in the NAACP ( no Blacks in the kkk) and Ms. Black amerikkka hell how many decades did it take to get a contestant of color in the ms. white amerikkka. You people really do have a god complex!

        • Dennis X

          Your liar or idiot or both.

          • Drakken

            So says our resident black panther.

          • glpage

            No, he’s just a low information ideologue.

          • mtnhikerdude

            Yo Dennis , you related to Malcom ?
            LOL !

          • Dennis X

            No , but it would be an honor. Are you related to David Duke? Do you even know the history of Malcom X?

          • Combat Veteran Seabee

            Do YOU?

          • objectivefactsmatter

            Given enough time he might have become a conservative.

          • tagalog

            Well, I for one have read The Autobiography of Malcolm X, which, interestingly enough, was written by someone other than Malcolm X and so isn’t an autobiography, but maybe Malcolm X was hiding stuff from some projected white readership.

          • glpage

            To the contrary, a recent Rasmussen poll showed that even blacks think blacks are more racist than whites.

          • Dennis X

            A white right wing poll tell you what Black People think, that’s rich. How did Rasmussen do in that last election ? There’s a difference between racism and hate!

          • Combat Veteran Seabee

            Exactly how? Please, try to make the distinction as the liberal you are, and you will lose in your own argument!

          • Drakken

            BOO! There is a white guy behind you!

          • Major

            Hey Eggplant….since you can’t stand any truths coming from whites…including the racist lineup at MSNBC ( your favorite I’m sure ), you need to migrate. Maybe Kenya…Obuttheads home favorite homey’s, perhaps?
            You deny that blacks are racist and have segregated themselves to favor the outcome of everything they do and can’t do? Including mastering English instead of an incomprehensible…Ebonics?

            Call us when you can beetch about the “White Entertainment Network or the White Congressional caucus or White Miss America or the White Lawyers association…OK Eggplant?

          • tagalog

            It’s true that many black people won’t respond truthfully to a poll administered by white people.

            Evidently such folks find it in their interest to keep certain things hidden. Maybe that’s why so many blacks think that white people are keeping things hidden from them.

          • OfficialPro

            Pardon me for being the grammar nazi here but allow me to correct your sentence:

            “You are a liar, or an idiot, or both.”

            mtnhikerdude is probably correct. The vast majority of whites couldn’t give a rat’s behind about race, and those that do, either read stuff about it or had their lives negatively affected by someone of another race (i.e. the stereotypical black mugger).

          • ziggy zoggy

            You are a liar and idiot both. White boy.

        • MarilynA

          In 1895 the Supreme Court ruled they were entitled to separate schools because they couldn’t keep up with the white children. (Plissy vs Board of Education) 50 years later they sued because they claimed the separate schools was causing them not to learn as much as the white students did. Now 50 years later, they have resegregated themselves but instead of demanding separate schools they have now won the fight for “social and economic justice” by forcing educators to dumb down the curriculums so that that white students are not taught any more than they can learn. Now everyone is getting an education equal to what blacks got in the pre desegregation all black schools, and they are affirmative actioned into colleges and jobs they cannot handle, while whites, especially white males are left to fend for themselves. . .

          • Dennis X

            You are an idiot. Most historically Black Colleges were opened ax 1867 or later so that freed slaves could get an education. My point is they ( the schools ) were segregated by whites. Even today these schools Morehouse , Spellman etc. are not segregated. Because whites are racist they just don’t attend these schools. Which is cool you don’t belong there. Your stupid ass comment had to all public schools that were segregated by whites!I know so-called affirmative action hurts because it broke up some of the ” good boy networks”

          • Elaine Blazosek

            kind of makes you wonder, maybe Old Abe was wrong!!!!

          • objectivefactsmatter

            No, it’s the collectivists that are wrong.

          • tagalog

            Plessy v. Ferguson had nothing to do with schools. Its fact pattern involved a Louisiana law that required blacks to wait for trains in black-only waiting rooms and whites to wait in whites-only waiting rooms. The reasoning was that if facilities are “separate but equal,” then segregation of the races by law passed constitutional muster.

        • tagalog

          Be glad that black people honor the principle of liberty, upon which the United States was founded, in segregating themselves from the mainstream, instead of insisting on equality, which is antithetical to freedom, which they usually do.

    • Gee

      Kind of like how the West treats Israel. If a Muslim slaughters a Jewish family and he is caught and tried – he becomes a political prisoner. If Muslims murder 100,000 other Muslims (Syria) nothing is said. But if one Israeli kills a Muslim attacking him – that is genocide.

      • mtnhikerdude

        Gee , Same Liberal Politically Correct Logic applies,
        Blame the tax payers . Blame the working class . Blame Christianity. Play the Race Card when all else fails. Enforce the death penalty for any white using the “N” word .
        There is no middle ground .
        It is acceptable for Muslims to call Jews apes and pigs ,yet make a film depicting Islam as a ” Religion of Hate” and go directly to jail.
        Criminals are now considered victims and victims are now considered criminals . If it wasn’t so sad it would be comical.
        Insanity is the soup de jour on Planet Earth.

        • MarilynA

          In Revelations it says that in the end times “Good will be evil and Evil will be good.” I never could figure out how that could be, but darned if we aren’t seeing it in our society now.

        • objectivefactsmatter

          Blame the capitalists.

    • glpage

      The politically correct attitudes you mention are a perfect example of leftist racism. They really don’t give a rat’s patoot about blacks except at voting time or when they can score points with low information voters.

      • Major

        And they elected a guy who they thinks gives a rats patooty about them…cause he was a shade darker than Mitt? LOL

        One of the greatest scams of all time Obuttheads pulled on them.

        A half white guy who wouldn’t rub elbows with 90% of them.

  • dizzyizzy

    The Left has caved to “black skin privilege’ as Greenfield asserts, which is puzzling as they are supposed to be the anti-racists par excellence. See http://clarespark.com/2013/07/02/groupiness-group-think-and-race/. “Groupiness, group-think, and ‘race’.”

  • trapper

    A commenter asks: “who is the liberal lynch mob”? Well, the same as the Duke Lacrosse lynch mob: Liberal news media who continually posted pictures of Martin as a 14 year old child instead of an adult; the liberal news media who called Zimmerman a “white” Hispanic; the liberal news media who gave us continual coverage of a not very significant incident; the liberal news media who edited the 911 call to make it appear that Zimmerman was racially motivated.
    And, then, there is Obama who intervened in the case by calling Martin his hypothetical son. And, then, there are all the Congressional Black Caucus who wore hoods and said things like: “Trayvon was killed for acting black”. (There is irony here but you will have to find it).
    And these are just for starters!

    • Dennis X

      And white companies that produced targets with the image of Martin holding a bag of candy and an ice tea. But its white so its not hate or racism!

      • Drakken

        You playing the victim only lasts for so long before whitey says enough is enough.

        • MarilynA

          The massive increase in the sales of gun and ammo makes it appear that whitey may have already reached the point where he no longer feels safe depending on government agencies to protect to protect him from our new domestic MauMau.

          • Combat Veteran Seabee

            Shoot first, ask questions later if riots break out! You are allowed to protect yourselves America, 2nd Amendment! Fuck oblowhole and holder, they will go down also!

        • tagalog

          That’s true, but only in the same sense that the Jack Nicholson character in A Few Good Men is correct when he says that America is free because he and his Marines man the battlements. It’s putting the cart before the horse.

          • Drakken

            There are millions of veterans and millions of hunters and shooters, if you think they will just stand by while the MauMau loot, rob, murder, burn and steal from them, you are very mistaken.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Yeah. The LA riot days are long over. We are tired of you.

        • Dennis X

          Never said I was A victim and your not man enough to make anyone a victim.

          • Drakken

            Come play, I’ll leave the light on for you.

          • Dennis X

            Give me directions to your trailer park.

          • Drakken

            Happy too kaffir, bring friends, you’ll needem. Sorry to disappoint you, but my house among a few, sits on a nice remote lake near the Cannuk border.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Give me directions to your mommy’s basement. B!tch.

          • ziggy zoggy

            sorry. Your 30 year old grandmamoms. Biiiiiiiitch.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Prove it, big mouth. talk is cheap and you lefties spew it in all directions.

      • glpage

        The image was a person wearing a hoodie with no visible face. Yeah, one can assume it was Martin, but it just as easily could be any young male that wears a hoodie. Was it racism? I don’t know the intent of the target manufacturer, might have been, then again, might not.

        • Ajax Dahgue

          the point about the target being Martin has credibility; the figure’s right hand has skittles and tea (I thought it was an anonymous hoodie at first, too). But, my other point above stands

        • Dennis X

          The image was of a person wearing a hoodie holding a ice tea and a bag of candy. Check ear waxes post!

          • objectivefactsmatter

            And it shows what in your mind?

            “Hey white people, shoot all of the blacks who carry candy and tea” or was it, “Look at poor Tray, targeted just because he’s black even when the tea and candy show he’s harmless?”

            This is just the kind of thing I’m talking about where racists see things only one way. It might be racist, but so are you.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Chomo.

        • objectivefactsmatter

          It’s also more likely trying to say he was immorally targeted. Not the kind of racism he’s talking about.

      • Ajax Dahgue

        You’re a jerk. Searching and reading articles about your allegation reveals that it was one guy that was trying to make money off controversy who made some targets. not ” white companies ” (you did use the plural…and BTW, how do you determine a company is “white”?)

        And if you search on the company name alledged to have produced the targets, the vast majority of the articles and posts are condemnation of said targets and the company (including a petition to close them down)…AND are coming from white folks and “white companies”.
        Racism is condemned by the vast majority of the majority. Actual white racists are a tiny minority of whites and almost universally condemned by the rest of us.
        so, you have no credibility and should shut your pie-hole (and put your typing fingers back in your pockets).

        • The March Hare

          Very well stated, Ajax. Thanks for checking into it to expose this.

        • Dennis X

          Thank you for confirming what I said, The fact is it happened period! All whites are racist just like all Blacks are thugs , are on food stamps etc.

          • Drakken

            Ya know malcom x wantabe, if you hate whitey that much, have you ever thought of moving back to Afrika, where I am sure that you wouldn’t have to put up with us whites?

          • Dennis X

            Its impossible to go BACK to somewhere you’ve never been. Besides I’m doing just fine here. I don’t have to deal with creepy crackers like you!

          • Combat Veteran Seabee

            But you will now deal with a Navspecwarcom warrior like
            me! Bring it on azzhole! You will not win in this battle or debate with me! You don’t have enough gunpowder to blow your own damned nose! GO AWAY BEFORE YOU GET TRULY EMBARASSED!!

          • Dennis X

            Shaking in my boots!

          • EarlyBird

            Dennis, you are obviously dealing with some unabashedly racist individuals, but there is a lot of legitimate frustration and anger being expressed here too.

            These electronic boards are the only place for white people to tell the obvious truth: there is a serious problem in the African-American community of thug culture, crime, violence, dropping out, multiple illegitimate and un-parented children, and on and on. The reason there is this terribly negative stereotype of young black males is that far too many fit this stereotype. BLACK women (such as my wife) hold their purses a little tighter when rowdy, rough, young black men get on the elevator.

            And it is no more racism when whites point this reality out than when Obama does to black college audiences.

            Agreed: Martin was going from Point A to Point B, doing nothing wrong at least until he had contact with Zimmerman. But why was Zimmerman suspicious? Because Martin had every outer appearance of the little thug that his record shows he was. He fit – yes – the profile of the very same young black thugs who had been breaking into apartments in that neighborhood. If red-haired midgets had been breaking into these homes, and Zimmerman saw a red-haired midget walking through the neighborhood, he’d have been just as suspicious.

            We’ve got to grapple with reality here. Young black men with the outer appearance of Martin are associated with violence and dysfunction, as many of them want to be. There is a serious problem inside black America and it has very little to do with white racism.

          • Bishop Greene

            Earlybird,

            I disagree, it is Black America who is making this about race, not White America as you put it. Martin was over top of Zimmerman pounding him into the concrete, if some thug was doing that to me I would blow him away also. If the situation was reversed you and others would be crying Martin was justified in killing Zimmerman but maybe that is your mentality anyway. If it had been reversed I would assure you Al Sharpton and others wouldn’t have come out from under their rocks to fight for what is right but I promise you many people would be out for Martin’s blood and he would be convicted regardless of the whining from the Black community. I know you also would not tolerate someone slamming your head into the concrete as was stated, so stop trying to make Martin into a victim, Martin’s own mother profited off her sons death by selling t-shirts and things. This is not the actions of a grieving parent, but rather of a greedy person. So in closing I will say let’s get off the race card and face reality. Martin was the agressor.

          • EarlyBird

            You’ve completely misunderstood my post. I wonder if you even read it.
            Agreed: many black Americans (certainly not all, maybe not even the majority) are making this about race, not whites. But white Americans have been forced to respond to the contention that Martin’s killing was about white racism.
            Was it about “race”? Partially. Because young black men are regretably but understandably associated with crime, Martin’s race was one component of his outer appearance, in the context of that particular neighborhood where other similar looking young black men had been breaking into homes, which made Zimmerman suspicious. But that does not indict Zimmerman for racism; it indicts young black American males who commit crimes disproportionate to their numbers for building this profile themselves.
            As for the case, there’s simply zero evidence that makes Zimmerman responsible for 2nd degree murder. I disbelieve certain parts of his story but find the pertinent parts of it believeable. There is no “beyond a reasonable doubt” level of evidence that the killing could be defined as 2nd degree murder. He may be guilty of some form of manslaughter. If he got a few years I wouldn’t cry.

          • Bishop Greene

            Early Bird

            Perhaps I misunderstood your post but it reads to me as if you are saying that the blame falls on white America when in fact it was people like Al Sharpton, who is a snake in the grass because he insights more problems than he helps solve. Others much like him do the same. Race was brought into it by people like Al Sharpton, Barack Obama and others who want to cause a race riot. These morons want to have whites and blacks fighting again because it makes them look good, keeping the pot stirring. While I agree racism is much alive, it is very little around. That is until people like Sharpton and Obama and others calling themselves activists do their best to stir the pot. They don’t want peace, they want hate and anger to keep going because it gives them cause to exist. Without these problems they would have nothing more to do and would have to go out and get real jobs. Al Sharpton is the biggest RACIST in America and even perhaps the World. He isn’t happy unless he is stirring the people into anger.

            Now as to Zimmerman, he may be guilty of manslaughter, but given the evidence he is most likely not guilty. Given that he was being beaten and the evidence proves this, he was being slammed on the concrete and if that were me I would have shot the moron too. As I said Martin’s own mother profited off her sons death by selling t-shirts and
            things. This is not the actions of a grieving parent, but rather of a
            greedy person. So in closing I will say let’s get off the race card and
            face reality. Martin was the aggressor he could have kept on walking ignoring Zimmerman, Martin was high on marijuana at the time, that is fact #2. Drugs make people react in funny ways. Fact #3, Martin’s school record and police record speak volumes as to the type of person he was. I don’t buy this he was an innocent kid bull.

          • EarlyBird

            Please read the posts you respond to. You continue to argue points on which we agree.
            The fact that Martin was not a choir boy, or his mother may be greedy, changes nothing about the case. (Nor do the tiny traces of marijuana found in Martin’s bloodstream, a drug which tends to make people less, not more, aggressive, why the defense isn’t making much of it.)
            Remember: even Zimmerman stated to 911 that Martin was merely walking through the neighborhood, NOT that he was trying doors, looking into cars, etc. (And again: given that Martin looked like the young black kids who had been recently breaking into homes in the neighborhood I understand Zimmerman’s suspicions. Was it “racial profiling”? Yes. But I blame young black thugs, not Zimmerman for creating that profile.)
            We now know that Martin was innocently walking through a neighborhood which he had every reason and right to be in. Period.
            I don’t believe Z committed murder, or that the evidence shows that he should be found guilty of murder. But I DO believe:
            - That Zimmerman wrongfully confronted Martin to hold him for the police and was only comfortable in doing so because he was armed;
            - That Martin may have feared for his own safety, and the fight ensued;
            - That Martin did NOT grab for Z’s gun as Z claims.
            - That Martin did NOTstate, as Z claims, “Tonight is the night you die!” (That’s out of Hollywood.)
            Martin was getting beaten in a fight that ONLY happened because he wrongfully precipitated it, ending in an apparent need for deadly force. That may or may not legally be manslaughter, but Zimmerman certainly has some moral culpability.

          • ziggy zoggy

            You have done a complete about face in your lefty rhetoric about widdle Twayvon. You recently encountered a real life Negro and got your @$$ beat, didn’t you? That is why reality hit you in the head. Don’t deny it, b!tch.

          • EarlyBird

            My “rhetoric” has been totally consistent on the killing of Trayvon Martin, you Neanderthal.Or has my position been just too complex for you?

            My position is:

            Zimmerman WRONGFULLY CREATED a situation THAT SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED IN THE FIRST PLACE where he apparently believed he needed to use deadly force. He WRONGFULLY precipitated a whole series of events against a TOTALLY INNOCENT PERSON which ended in him killing someone in self defense.

            The state simply could not prove within a reasonable doubt that at the time he pulled the trigger he didn’t believe he was in danger of serious bodily harm or death. I believe the verdict was correct under the law, but that Zimmerman is still morally culpable for the entire tragic set of circumstances.

            Now back to your cave.

          • No2Deviants

            GayBird was spewing his Trayvon-loving crap today on another thread, then he backtracked because the crowd was realizing that his liberal bigotry is based on his gay deviancy. He always backtracks as he tries to stay in is closet.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Girly, you muslims really hate Blacks, don’t you? It’s because they remind you of your abject inferiority.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Girly, you just gave me a heart attack. You told the truth for the first time in your life and it was conservative.
            I will send you my medical bill. 3:)

          • EarlyBird

            Truth and honesty is not “conservative” or “liberal.”

          • ziggy zoggy

            Shaking your @$$ for five dollar tricks. B!tch.

          • EarlyBird

            Dear Lord, dude. Chill out.

          • ziggy zoggy

            F*** you.

          • No2Deviants

            Have you announced yet to everybody that your new liberal nickname is GayBird?

          • Drakken

            Well perhaps you would be much happier in the land of your ancestors Kaffir.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            That’s real retarded, sir.

          • m4253y

            love it, lol

          • Paul Yoder

            The ‘c’ word is just as racist as the ‘n’ word. Look in the mirror to find the real racist.

          • Dawn – Naturally Texan

            only racist i see here is you. =(

          • m4253y

            “…that’s retarded sir”

          • Major

            And if you’ve NEVER been there…you’re hardly “afrikan” are you? Eggplant.

          • fistdeyuma

            Would not work Drakken. Those there would give everything they had to go to the USA. They have good work habits and an entrepreneur spirit that helps them succeed if they do come to the states. Someone from the US would look like a bum and asked to go back to where the government can afford to support their lazy butt.

          • Drakken

            Very true, plus the ones there wouldn’t tolerate them for very long.

          • m4253y

            i believe he was being sarcastic…or just plain “retarded

          • objectivefactsmatter

            So you’re playing a caricature of a racist?

            Racism sure exists. You’re a racist and most leftist are racists too. They’re proud of it too because they think they are just. They’re lunatics.

            But it seems you think that all “racism” is ipso facto from whitey and for the benefit of whitey.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            You’re acting out as a caricature in response to being or feeling stereotyped?

      • OfficialPro

        Hey for all you know the company could be hispanic. There’s a civil war going on between Blacks and Hispanics, ya know…

        • ziggy zoggy

          And the beaners are winning. Thank God.

      • BRK

        Martins OWN MOTHER tradmarked his name less than amonth after the incident to make money off of it. Don’t act like white folks are the ONLY scumbags out there exploiting a sensationalized issue for quick money/TV ratings.

        • Dennis X

          Good for her.

          • Major

            No good for Trayvon. That’s probably the most significant contribution he’s made in his life. Making the “parents” rich. It’s pretty clear that his imminent incarceration in a State prison like Starke or Raiford wouldn’t have yielded such rewards for mom and dear old pop.

            And acquital or not…dear little St. Skittles will bring in a paycheck so long as the race hustlers can squeeze a dime out of those cute pictures of him as an all “American” lad. And as long as Fat Al ( poverty and race pimp ) can make a percentage off it too.

            Alas…Such was Skittles fate to be like too many other young black youts that willingly choose the “Gangsta” mantra. And cheap plaid undies from Walmart as their uniform.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Dude, why did you have to insult Jabba? he was a huge worm but at least he had a neck.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            You’re a white supremacist trying to pose as a caricature of a black racist.

          • Dennis X

            Now that’s a new one. But not the case.

          • ziggy zoggy

            No, you’re a White ret@rded leftist posing as an angry Black man. F*** you.

      • Bishop Greene

        Dennis X, do us all a favor and crawl back in the hole you came out of and shut up as it appears your full of hate for white people and will say anything to justify the lies you tell. Racism comes more from people such as yourself and less and less from white people who are accepting of everyone else based on behavior and attitude and almost always not about skin color but you apparently are hung up back in the 60′s and want to play the poor us factor even today. Like I said it’s time to crawl back under your rock and be quiet.

        • Combat Veteran Seabee

          Hey Dennis X,
          Ever hear of “Anthony Johnson?” Maybe you need a history lesson! Look him up and get set straight about slavery and such! You are nothing but an uneducated, uninformed, illiterate fool!

        • Dennis X

          No

          • ziggy zoggy

            “No” what? No you don’t like women or no you don’t like to give reacharounds out of common courtesy? CHOMO.

      • Combat Veteran Seabee

        Are you really that much of a liberal , uneducated, uninformed, obamabot, fool?

      • objectivefactsmatter

        Show me what you’re talking about and I’ll offer my comment.

        Racism is racism.

        • Dennis X

          My point regarding the target is that is it an image of Martin. Which is truly sick but truly white amerikkka to profit from someones death and to and incite uneducated rednecks like dragoon. I love describing whites the way whites do Black People and according to these responses you’ll can’t take it. I love it ! Example, dragoon always using the term kaffir which is another way of saying ni–ger. Now I know that and I’m sure you know that but I’m the racist. And you wonder why I feel the way I do.

          • Drakken

            Gee whiz golly! it couldn’t possibly be the HUGE chip on your shoulder could it? Love how you misspell America, and you call me a redneck and uneducated? Priceless!

          • Dennis X

            Hosier,hey

          • ziggy zoggy

            “Hoser, eh,” you f****** ret@rd.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “My point regarding the target is that is it an image of Martin.”

            We all agree that the event has been politicized. Images are often used or abused for these purposes.

            “Which is truly sick but truly white amerikkka to profit from someones death…”

            “white amerikkka” profits on the backs of non-whites, right? We know this because we just know this.

            “…and to and incite uneducated rednecks like dragoon.”

            Only whites incite violence. How do we know? Because they’re white. Blacks are innocent. How do we know? Because they’re black.

            We know because we know.

            I don’t know who “dragoon” is, but we know he’s white because you don’t exactly care much for him.

            We know because we know.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Dennis X sez, “And you wonder why I feel the way I do.”

            No, not really. Sperm consumption destroys brain cells. A mouth is a terrible thing to waste.

      • m4253y

        “…that’s retarded sir”

    • DoubleTap45

      I HOPE Corey gets the exact same treatment that Nifong got in the Duke case. His career is whale dung now.

      Ray from Bloombergia

      NRA Life

      • MarilynA

        The fact is that local authorities did not deem this case worthy of prosecution and were forced to indict Zimmerman by the state Attorney General under pressure from the Just Dept. It appears to me that the prosecution’s case was conducted in such a way as to show the world why they didn’t want to indict Zimmerman. They had no legitimate cause to indict him because all the evidence points to the fact that Zimmerman was a victim of a hate crime perpetrated by an black hoodlum. Did anyone ever think that Martin may have had a juvenile rap sheet and the local cops were familiar with his criminal activities. Does anyone think that school authorities did not notify the local police when they caught Martin with burglary tools and stolen jewelry at school? He was suspended from school. Surely the school notified the police.

        • EarlyBird

          Marilyn, I was with you until this:

          “…all the evidence points to the fact that Zimmerman was a victim of a hate crime perpetrated by an black hoodlum.”
          No it doesn’t. All the evidence shows is that these two were in a struggle, and Zimmerman probably was getting the crap beaten out of him. To suggest that the evidence shows that Martin’s struggle was race-based is as absurd as suggesting Zimmerman got out of the car with the intention of blowing someone away.
          “Did anyone ever think that Martin may have had a juvenile rap sheet and the local cops were familiar with his criminal activities…”
          Martin’s record has zero bearing on the case. The question of self defense vs. murder doesn’t change because we discovered after the fact that Martin was a little hoodlum.

        • DoubleTap45

          He also doubled back on Zim. I agree that it was foolish to leave the car but he was not ordered to. He talked to a low rent 911 operator NOT a cop or DA.

          Ray from Bloombergia
          NRA Life

          • EarlyBird

            You’ve got it backwards. After Martin saw Zimmerman checking him out at first, he was trying to get away from Zimmerman.

            It was Zimmerman who doubled back on Martin by his own admission. Zimmerman states that he called 911, and got back out of the car after the operator told him “We don’t need you to do that” in order to check the name of the street sign, at which time the altercation took place. I think they either bumped into each other again, or Zimmerman was trying to confront him.

            But I surely don’t believe Z’s contention that Martin “jumped out of the bushes,” or for that matter in the midst of their fight grabbed for the gun and said, “Tonight is the night you die!” That sounds like Zimmerman guilding the lilly to me.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Everything you wrote is a lie, you little b!tch. F*** yourself deep.

          • EarlyBird

            You’ve got an anger problem, Soggy.

          • No2Deviants

            Don’t have another hissy fit, GayBird. You know you wet your panties last time.

          • http://www.facebook.com/phil.schipsi Phil Schipsi

            Earlybird: Are you kidding? TM could easily have outdistanced GZ, if he chose to. There is absolutely no reason to disbelieve GZ’s story. It all conforms to forensic and witness evidence.

        • tagalog

          The prosecution of George Zimmerman is a demonstration of the age-old trial lawyers’ principle that you can’t turn a pile of dung into a pile of gold no matter how good you are.

    • Ajax Dahgue

      Don’t forget the media description that Zimmerman shot Martin “as he was walking home from a convenience store…” to make it sound like Z gunned him down in cold blood.

      - a -

    • knowshistory

      I would have to agree with the racist media about saint trayvon being killed for acting black. he was killed committing battery due to his own racist animosity. if that aint acting black, what is?

    • ExposeNRidRacism

      Tim Wise on CNN, 7/14/13: Race, Trayvon Martin and the Zimmerman Trial

      http://www.timwise.org/2013/07/tim-wise-on-cnn-71413-race-trayvon-martin-and-the-zimmerman-trial/

      Trayvon Martin,
      White Denial and the Unacceptable Burden of Blackness in America

      http://www.timwise.org/2012/03/trayvon-martin-white-denial-and-the-unacceptable-burden-of-blackness-in-america/

      Trayvon Martin’s
      Death Extends Sanford’s Sordid Legacy

      http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/03/trayvon-martin-sanford-racial-history

      The Trayvon
      Martin Killing, Explained

      http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/03/what-happened-trayvon-martin-explained

  • American Avant Garde

    Fight black skin privilege!

  • cathy

    What is wrong with this picture? There appears to be a prosecution and judicial conspiracy in an attempt to bring about a guilty verdict. Why? Is it about a PC appeasing of the Black community?
    .

    Zimmerman judge needs to read this case on authentication of text messages
    July 10, 2013 at 7:11am

    Judge Nelson stated that there was no evidence that Trayvon typed the texts even though the messages were on his phone and stored in DOUBLE-PASSWORD protected format usingphone apps. …

    The defense countered that its computer forensic expert, who testified, was able to track hundreds if not thousand of text messages on the phone and that the flow of conversations indicated it was Trayvon in context

    http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/07/zimmerman-judge-needs-to-read-this-case-on-authentication-of-text-messages/
    .

    Breaking – Jury will not get to see Trayvon fighting texts
    July 10, 2013 at 9:15am

    The Judge in the Zimmerman trial just ruled that the jury will not get to see numerous text messages on Trayvon Martin’s phone regarding his prowess at fighting, including texts as to how to punch someone in the nose and make them bleed.

    http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/07/breaking-jury-will-not-get-to-see-trayvon-fighting-texts/

  • UCSPanther

    Personally, I can’t wait for this circus to end, so we can analyze the facts critically WITHOUT the shrill circus of emotion and idiots in the background…

    • Drakken

      The circus is only at the beginning, if and when Zimmerman gets acquitted, the blacks will go full Congo and expect the rest of us to go along with it because it’s all of our fault and they have an excuse.

      • Charlie97

        Why are you so racist? You hate Muslims because of Beirut, apparently. What happened to make you hate black people? Someone slash your tyres you thick moron?

        • Drakken

          Racist no , western culturalist absolutely! In case it escaped your notice muzzy, we are no longer a melting pot, but a boiling pot, multiculturalism and diversity are epic fails and we are headed for conflict. It is that bloody simple.
          As for your kkk comparison, the kkk has been dead for years and have a few old geezers who are no threat to anyone, but you folks love to bring that up at every turn and throw down the race card and then have the temerity to tell us to ignore the problem and let you folks do your worst and expect no response. We infidels will not go quietly into the night no matter how much you wish it so.

  • DoubleTap45

    If it’s “not about race” then WHY replace the Chief for a black hack to appease the mob? I’m sure an examination of the new chief’s record will show a mediocre at best cop advanced to appease the race baiters.

    Ray from Bloombergia
    NRA Life

    • Major

      Cause the Bantus really believe a good black cop won’t have them arrested for crimes? Nah..he’s a “brother”…he’d never be down with the law…would he?

      • DoubleTap45

        I worked once with a black ex-detective when I used to supervise a security firm at night for extra $. He told me they’d try to “brother” him. He told them that if they called HIM “brother” one more time he’d soon be an only child. LOL

        Ray from Bloombergia

        • ziggy zoggy

          He sounds like one of the good ones.

  • Drakken

    If the blacks riot, the whites won’t sit idly by and be victims, they will band together and shoot anything that moves, so go ahead race baiters and keep stirring the boiling pot, the law of unintended consequences will be that we aren’t as weak and helpless as you thought we would be and we will fight back, the days of easy pickings because you threw the race card and us to fold in the face of it are going to come to a very nasty end.

    • UCSPanther

      And the race pimps will only have themselves to blame when it all comes down…

    • EarlyBird

      If “the blacks” riot, they are going to burn down their own neighborhoods, if history is any lesson. I lived through the LA riots, and barely a scratch happened in white neighborhoods. (Oh, but Korean shopkeepers weren’t burned out of their stores specifically because they were non-black, but we’re not supposed to mention that.)

      • Major

        Not the ones ( Koreans ) with AR15′s and shotguns at the ready.

        • EarlyBird

          I remember during the riots being glued to the television watching some Korean shop owners shooting at looters and arsonists with their pistols, just a handful of miles or so from where I lived at the time. Gripping stuff. That footage is what the NRA should show over and over as to why people need to be able to have guns.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Holy cr@p! You just made two sensible comments in a row! Who is using your name tag? This isn’t you.

      • autdrew

        the nbpp has been saying they wont burn down their own areas but plan on attacking “white neighborhoods”. Ive heard Florida has a large number of concealed carry permits, I hope that is a deterrent.

        • tagalog

          Given the recent flurry of sales of firearms and ammo since Newtown, a black incursion into white neighborhoods may be suicidal. But then again, maybe not.

        • EarlyBird

          What is the “NBPP”?

          • autdrew

            New Black Panther Party

    • ziggy zoggy

      Exact;y.

  • OfficialPro

    Nobody chooses not to watch BET over anyone on it being black, geez, if being black prevented people from watching TV shows then Family Matters, The Cosby Show, Good Times, The Jeffersons, Sanford and Son, Dif’frent Strokes, 227, Amen, and a ton of other shows never would have got off the ground. If they’re not watching BET it’s because the shows suck.

    • ziggy zoggy

      They suck racist ant-White @$$.

  • victoryman

    Stopping the potential riots is simple. Do whatever was done to prevent the nation-wide, angry White mobs from rioting, looting and burning after the O.J. innocent verdict. No riots. No looting. No burning. Those angry Whites were stopped even before they began their orgy of looting and destruction. Whatever was done here, worked. The evil, riot-prone, easily led Whites stayed home and watched events on their bought-and-paid-for TV’s – not one just stolen from the nearest store. They also drank their own bought-and-paid-for beer and liquor. The local liquor stores didn’t suffer one broken window, or looting. Am I missing something here? I’m sure such “Leaders” as Jackson and Sharpton will do all in their power to calm the mobs…….not. Maybe Tawana Brawley will make an appearance.

  • clifhennecy

    Let them riot! I certainly wouldn’t expect any better of them. I’m prepared, in any event.

  • Melinda Craig

    since zimmerman is Hispanic why are blacks not threatening Hispanics? How did this turn into a war on the whites? This just proves whites are not safe around black mobs and the thugs they raise by the thousands, and proves blacks and their leaders would use any excuse to kill cr@ckers,

  • Drakken

    Hmmm I guess we should judge the way things are by looking at who is fighting to get into what neighborhood, I frankly don’t see whites trying to get into black neighborhoods, but I do see them fleeing them.

    • Dennis X

      Should you do its called gentrification.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        “Should you do its called gentrification.”

        And what does that tell you?

  • videriquamesse

    I’m still diligently researching what is meant by the phrase so beloved of MSNBC and CNN hacks, “White Hispanic.” As I recall a cursory investigation of George Zimmerman’s genealogy revealed that he had some African ancestors mixed with his Hispanic heritage.
    But, [and...this is a BIG but] “It’s. Not. About. Race!” Keep repeating that particular piece of fiction long enough and maybe people will believe it.

    • ElizabethMC

      If Zimmerman is a “White Hispanic” does that make obama a white African American…or vice versa…a black Caucasian?
      These people never think of the logical extension of their supposed logic.

      • videriquamesse

        From what I’ve seen about our President’s growing up years he was raised by a white mother, a white grandmother and was known as “Barry.” That’s about as white as you could get. As my senator, Light Horse Harry Reid said of Obama, “…he has no Negro accent unless he wants to.”

  • Alohajonny

    Great read and spot on. Obama is a Sunni and an A$$ Whole

  • Bishop Greene

    The statement that makes the most sense is this one “While the shooting was not about race, the case has become a political
    juggernaut that is not about what actually happened between Zimmerman
    and Martin, but about the guilt and violence churning through the
    liberal exploitation of race and racism for political power”

    To replace the police chief with an African American who is doing what he can to insight a riot by making promises he has no intent on keeping to solicit the help of black pastors in the monitoring the trial, what will he accomplish if they report back that Zimmerman is set free being found not guilty which I believe he should be. The evidence shows that Martin was high, and drugs make people act in horrible ways and the fact that he was over top of Zimmerman being his head into the concrete would make me shoot someone who was doing great harm to me. Yes, Martins parents want to find fault with Zimmerman because they want to portray their son as an angel who did no wrong but we all know that ain’t true, he used drugs, he had problems in school and he was a THUG. I believe the race card is used as a matter of convenience rather then actual truth because it gives some people something else to blame rather than take the blame where is should be upon the person.

    No truer statement than this, ” The race cards of black privilege can only be played so many times until the final card of violence is drawn from the deck”

  • garyfouse

    As an ex-DEA agent who worked with pride in DOJ for almost 25 years, I feel shame at what this DOJ has become under Hoider and Thomas Perez. What kind of Justice Department sends operatives to Florida to organize demonstrations to indict a man and fire a police chief? That is the stuff of a third world banana republic.
    What kind of media leads a charge to convict a man especially in the face of so much exculpatory evidence?
    This case puts my life experience upside down. I never thought I would see the day when a man who is innocent wisely decides not to testify. I am by nature a prosecution guy and had always thought only guilty defendants shouldn’t testify.
    This case should never have been allowed to go to the jury especially with all this racial background. Once the state rested, the motion for acquittal should have been granted . The judge didn’t have the courage to do her duty and preferred to dump it in the laps of the jury.
    By the time the state finsihes their rebuttal, they just may convict Trayvon Martin of assault beyond a reasonable doubt.

    • DoubleTap45

      The Obama Crime Family WANTS to turn America into a 3rd World Banana Republic. They think that’s “only fair” because Frank Marshall Davis (look HIM up) taught Obama from age 8-18.

      Ray from Bloombergia

  • Elaine Blazosek

    Dennis, I do not know of colleges that do not allow whites. but I do know of many that have “black” organizations, but not white organizations. when my daughter-in-law was in law school, there was a group for black students only, but NO group for whites only. what would happen if whitey tried???? ACLU!!

    • Dennis X

      Black

      • Dennis X

        Black People like anyone else will seek social organizations. When you have been excluded then you form your own. So fraternities as an example whites would not allow Blacks into theirs so we started our own. However, unlike the whites we don’t discriminate. There are a few white brothers in my frat. When surrounded by hate people will tend to circle the wagons.

        • objectivefactsmatter

          “Black People like anyone else will seek social organizations. When you have been excluded then you form your own. So fraternities as an example whites would not allow Blacks into theirs so we started our own.”

          That would be a good explanation for the origin. What’s the explanation now? It seems like at least some of these “racial equity” and “social justice” warriors are like fishermen stocking the lakes. With our blood and treasure.

        • Drakken

          Please do tell us how that degree in ethnic studies is going? I don’t usually talk to someone with an ethnic studies degree, but when I do, I usually ask for large fries with that.

      • ziggy zoggy

        $hit is black and so are you. $hitty, that is.

  • Combat Veteran Seabee

    Zimmerman needs to go free, and oblowhole and holder put in his place, as acutaries in civil unrest!

  • edgineer

    We are getting close to the time for white backlash.

  • garyfouse

    Double Tap45
    Agreed.

  • Bishop Greene

    Shortly after Martin’s death his mother capitalized on his death and sold t-shirts and caps with his name on them and photo so she could make money, what kind of mother does that upon the death of their so called beloved child. Non that I know of who are fit to be parents. She will probably sold his clothing to make money on them all in the name of money, not love. Now she plays the part of the bereaved mother who lost her baby. Something wrong with this picture. Selling t-shirts and hats with her kids photo to make a buck. SHAME ON HER.

  • Rod Jacobs

    If you’re against Zimmermen then you are racist!!!

  • The Dead Critic

    Where is the national media interest in 100′s of other similar cases across the nation?

  • DebRollin

    The Fact that the DOJ enabled the rallies in Florida for Trayvon and Against Zimmerman shows the Government is not interested in a fair trial, once again they are promoting division and lawlessness.

  • spyeatte

    Let the Zulus riot.

  • Paul Yoder

    Mr. Greenfield, I MUST take issue with one thing you said. “Justice system” does NOT exist in this country, we have a legal system that struggles mightily to make sure no perpetrator is mistreated, while running roughshod over the right of the victim. In this case, justice has already been meted out, as the aggressor was neutralized by the victim.

  • BBop

    Would seem the real enemy here is the ‘liberal news media.’

    It becomes not a question of race or racialization, but who in the name of fkc is consistently glorifying this idea and pushing it down the throats of impressionable people.

    Who keeps it going?

  • Barb3000

    If you haven’t heard about this it was found out that the Justice Dept.helped organize Trayvon Martin protests. What was done also has caused numerous deaths and serous injuries by gangs attacking and trying to kill any white person they find on the street. One guy is in critical condition. There may be more that got away from the mobs. The organization in the Justice Dept. is called the,”Community Relations Service”.

  • seewithyourowneyes

    Don’t forget that this case came to national attention during a presidential election campaign! This case is only about race because the Obama campaign needed fresh meat to feed his narrative and gin up the vote.
    The same thing happened in his 2008 campaign, with the Black Panthers complaining about racism in a case where a group of about six black young men knocked a white student unconscious, and then spent 10 minutes jumping on his unconscious body, breaking his ribs, stomping on his head and putting him into a coma. (Wouldn’t that, by any rational standards, be anti-white racism?) The Panthers complaint was that a charge of attempted murder was too high. Big protests, national news, all right on time to help the Obama 2008 campaign.
    I remember, decades ago, when a law-and-order Republican running against his soft-on-crime Democrat opponent, criticized the Democrat’s policy of quick parole for violent criminals. The Republican used the picture of a recently paroled inmate who’d gone on to commit another murder. That inmate’s name was Willie Horton. Anyone else remember that? Well, because Willie Horton was black, the Democrats accused the Republican of being racist, and of using racism to get votes. It was a very big story at the time. Compare and contrast to the way Democrats now use racism to buy votes! Compare to the way the shameless news media actually fabricated evidence in the Zimmerman case, claiming falsely and repeatedly that Zimmerman used a racial epithet in his 911 call. The truth is that the Willie Horton story would have worked for the Republican candidate even if Willie had been white. But the Zimmerman case works for Obama only because of the race of the parties. The hypocrisy of the left is truly breathtaking.

  • Guest

    Would love to take Al Sharpton hunting with me, my vest would be bullet proof, I have one for him too. It would be a trip I would never forget, and I must say after reading the threats on twitter that if Zimmerman gets off and goes free, some saying they will begin killing white people. I say bring it on I have plenty of ammo and a complete armory. I say take your chances and you will many who have died being stupid.

  • HADENOUGHINAMERICA

    Would love to take Al Sharpton hunting with me, my vest would be bullet
    proof, I have one for him too. It would be a trip I would never forget,
    and I must say after reading the threats on twitter that if Zimmerman
    gets off and goes free, some saying they will begin killing white
    people. I say bring it on I have plenty of ammo and a complete armory.
    I say take your chances and you will join many who have died being stupid.

  • HiPlainsDrifter

    Look for a hung jury…a mistrial….a re-file of charges threat by the State….then quietly ship Zimmerman off to the Witness Protection Program…in Idaho…

  • http://boogieforward.us/ K-Bob

    Once your skin color group has moved to second place “minority” status, it’s a little late to begin a war based on skin color.

    But even worse, the skin-color obsessed left seems to forget that barack is the world’s greatest gun salesman (of all time). Add that fact to the fact that the skin-color hucksters have been threatening violence for many months.

    Do the math.

    Don’t follow skin-color obsessed Democrats down a suicidal path.

    Better still, forget skin color entirely and support Liberty, the right to defend yourself, and the only minority that matters: the individual.

  • cathy

    Ben Kruidbos and former Sanford Police Chief Bill Lee are both men of integrity. Doing right is not always easy when there are personal consequences but it is always right.

    Each article is a must read in its entirety. IMO

    +++++

    Ex-Sanford police chief: Zimmerman probe ‘taken away from us’
    July 11, 2013

    “I upheld my oath,” Lee said. “I’m happy that at the end of the day I can walk away with my integrity.”

    One of his greatest regrets, he said, is that the Zimmerman investigation ultimately shattered his childhood dream to be police chief of the community where he was raised.

    “It’s a dream of a vision that is going to be unrealized,” he said. “I’m at peace with it on most days. I’m a man of faith. But it stings.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2013/07/10/justice/sanford-bill-lee-exclusive

    .
    State Attorney Angela Corey fires information techonology director who raised concerns in Trayvon Martin case
    July 13, 201

    He said he had acted in good faith about “genuine concerns.” He said he had been proud to work at the State Attorney’s Office and feared the letter would cripple his chances at finding another job to support his family, including a 4-month-old son.

    “I don’t have any regrets,” he said, “but I am terrified about the future and what that will end up being”.

    http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/2013-07-13/story/state-attorney-angela-corey-fires-information-techonology-director-who

  • ExposeNRidRacism
  • ExposeNRidRacism

    Tim Wise
    on CNN, 7/14/13: Race, Trayvon Martin and the Zimmerman Trial

    http://www.timwise.org/2013/07/tim-wise-on-cnn-71413-race-trayvon-martin-and-the-zimmerman-trial/