Hindu American Foundation Calls Attention to Muslim Hinduphobia

bangladesh-islamic-terrorism-300x2032

Muslim religious tolerance is rather notorious. But while Muslims have the ability to drive stories about their grievances in any part of the world from America to Burma to Israel, Muslim persecution of non-Muslims tends to stay buried.

But the Hindu American Foundation is attempting to bring attention to the serious problem of Muslim Hinduphobia.

With the release of their ninth annual report, members of the Hindu American Foundation are pushing policymakers to take action against international human rights violations directed at Hindus.

The four countries the report categorized as egregious violators — Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia and Pakistan — are all Muslim-majority countries.

Samir Kalra, author of the report, titled “Hindus in South Asia and the Diaspora: A Survey of Human Rights” said the foundation included countries in which the plight of Hindus is largely overlooked. The impact of the report, he said, is twofold: It gives a voice to Hindu minorities and educates officials in the U.S. and worldwide.

The 2012 report cites Bhutan, Sri Lanka and the Indian state of Jammu as countries of serious concern, while Fiji, Saudi Arabia and Trinidad and Tobago as countries where conditions for Hindus have improved. Kalra said the problem is that many of these nations sanction discrimination, creating “an atmosphere of intolerance at the top, which trickles down.”

Kalra said he’s concerned the U.S. government hasn’t taken more notice of this persecution, adding that human rights often take a back seat to geopolitical issues. But he hopes the foundation’s report works to create a link between the two issues.

They take a backseat, because violence and oil count for more than actual human rights.

  • truebearing

    And then there is Buddiphobia, Christophobia, and Sane-ophobia. Even if there weren’t any other religions to attack, the Muslims would still have Sunniphobia and Shiite-ophobia. They hate and kill each other too, despite sharing the same “holy” scripture.
    If Islam wins in its cultish obsession with world domination, humanity will die. In the end, there will be two Muslims left and they will be fighting each other, to the death, over one idiotic belief, or another. The winner will than shout “Allahu Akbar” and fire his worn out AK-47 into the air….and then dead silence as he realizes that he is all alone and that Islam’s goal of world domination destroyed itself when it destroyed the human race.

    • http://israel-thrives.blogspot.com/ ziontruth

      You know, I always heard the truism that “all religions lead to intolerance and war,” but one day it dawned on me that in today’s world, all the religions of the world are at peace except one particular troublemaker.

      I don’t think that anti-religious statement was sweepingly true even historically, but today it’s as untrue as can be, and it’s pretty much a whitewash over the fact that, if you just removed the train of all the gruesome news concerning that specific religion and the interactions of its adherents with everybody else, you’d realize what a bane on peaceful coexistence that single religio-political system is.

      The one spoiled brat that needs to be dragged kicking and screaming into modernity, yet everyone’s careful not to step on its adherents’ toes.

      • truebearing

        I’m afraid that ‘spoiled brat’ is demonically possessed.

  • Softly Bob

    Islamophobia is the only recognized disorder because the Muslims have oil. The Hindus and Buddhists don’t, and even they did have some the Muslims would have stolen their land years before it was discovered.

    If there was no oil under that wretched barren peninsula called Arabia or it’s ME neighbours, then Islamophobia would be confined purely to it’s sub-disorders of Sunniphobia and Shiaphobia, and Hinduphobia and Christophobia would never have existed,
    Geography has a lot to answer for!

    • ziggy zoggy

      Jihad pre-date the existence of the internal combustion engine.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        “Jihad pre-date the existence of the internal combustion engine.”

        This is of course true.

        But Bob is also correct that our ridiculous appeasement policies and attitudes are driven in large part by oil.

        Let’s say that the left would certainly have the same motives to use Islam against Judeo Christian values, but it would be harder to corrupt everyone else.

        Would FDR have entered in to a bilateral defense agreement with the Saudis without oil? Absolutely not. He may have had the same kind of naive approach, but without any reason to approach him in the first place.

        That alone emboldened them as to just how far they could influence American politics. That was the original Islamic Trojan horse in America. Without the oil, maybe the jihadis would have discovered another way in to Europe. I doubt they would get as far as they have.

        Without that Trojan horse invited by FDR, the agreements that followed, and OPEC, most of the other organized jihad support networks would be raising funds how?

        Today’s chaos is the true legacy of FDR and the communist dupes that followed. FDR was not the first dupe, he just made some of the most catastrophic decisions that empowered all of the enemies we have today.

        If we consistently had Islam-savvy leaders from the start of the Middle East oil era, we would have had strategic planning that prevented them from using oil supplies as a political tool against us. It’s not that they’re smarter than us, it’s that we underestimate them intellectually because of their savage behaviors.

  • Gee

    I think that since Islam’s problems is with all non-Muslims that the term Xenophobia would be more appropriate.

    They do not hate Hindus and more than they hate Jews or Christians or any other religion or non-religion

    • OfficialPro

      well, actually they do, because Hindus are “polytheists” and to them, that’s even worse than Jewish (because as much as they hate Jews they recognize the Jews only have One God).

      • ziggy zoggy

        Actually they don’t, because they are far more murderous to Jews.

        • OfficialPro

          Well, they don’t think Hindus are trying to take over the world. There’s no Hindu equivalent to the Protocols. So Jews do come off looking more sinister, in the Muslim narrative, but not based on religion alone.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        “well, actually they do, because Hindus are “polytheists” and to them, that’s even worse than Jewish (because as much as they hate Jews they recognize the Jews only have One God).”

        That depends. Jews who refuse to submit to sharia are worse than Hindus in the minds of jihadis. Jews also have a better chance of surviving if they agree to submit without converting to Islam.

        It’s complicated. Collectively though, the Jews are considered the worst. It’s just that according to Islamic “history” there were once “Islamic Jews” and if a Jew today submits to sharia, many Muslims will consider him a virtual Muslim with a distinct Islamic identity.

        This is also why it is acceptable to pose as a Christian or a Jew, like 0′Bama and Wiener. They cross their fingers when they make their claims, and they’re really referring to the theoretical Islamic Christians and Islamic Jews that never actually existed outside of the mind of Mohammed.

        O’Bama: “I’m a Christian” “Praise allah.” (See the ring)

        And doesn’t Wiener act a lot more like Mohammed than say, Moses?

        Can’t remove ->

    • Raymond_in_DC

      “Who they hate more” is an interesting exercise. Hindus are deemed “polytheists”, and thus usually hated more than “People of the Book” (Jews and Christians). But Christians themselves are sometimes deemed polytheists over the Trinity, except that Jesus is considered a prophet. Then of course, there are the “heretics”, who have introduced “blasphemous” notions like a prophet after the “final prophet” Mohammed (Baha’i), and apostates who have abandoned Islam altogether – sometimes for atheism, sometimes for one of the hated faiths – deemed worthy of death.

      Is there any other religion for which this exercise might be conducted? None come to mind.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      “I think that since Islam’s problems is with all non-Muslims that the term Xenophobia would be more appropriate.”

      Straight up salient facts don’t always go over well when you’re trying to educate people collectively, especially with a message they don’t want to hear and are not compelled to listen to.

      Most of the population today is duped at least to some degree by communist-leftist ideas. The whole class-victim thing is more compelling and believable to their ears than a story about a “class” (ideological) enemy that has always been cast as one of their pet victims.

      “They do not hate Hindus and more than they hate Jews or Christians or any other religion or non-religion”

      True. But they do hate Hindus, and this flies in the face of the communist narratives that the Islamic imperialists only hate the West because they’ve been victims of Western imperialism. Western imperialism empowered the good people in Islamic societies, with few exceptions.

      So it’s still true and useful to teach to the mushrooms that one of their pets is actually the worst monster on the planet.

  • ytdontplay

    I was speaking to a Hindu professor after he blasted “whitey” for all the evil in the world. I asked about the Muslims in Kashmir, he said that all the chaos in India is caused by the Muslims. How convenient.

    • voidist

      How convenient …indeed…you must be refering to the ethnic
      cleansing of Hindus from the Kashmiri Valleys by your muslim
      friends from the Terrorist state of pakistan