Huthi Says Killing Houthi More Important Than Killing Jews


Jihad is all about priorities

Jihad is all about priorities

Jihad is all about priorities.

Sure the Koran says that Allah sent Mo to wage war and be “victorious over all religions, even though the infidels may resist.” (Koran 61:9) But does killing of Muslims from other sects come before killing Jews and Christians?

With the Middle East exploding in a Muslim civil war, Jihadi Triage is becoming a serious issue. Who do you kill first? Whom do you kill second? What’s that suicide bomber doing on third? What do you mean you kill Houthi first? I asked you, who do you kill first?

In Yemen, Sheik Huthi says the Houthis have to be killed before the Jews. The Houthis, a Shiite sect/clan/militia (a common combination in the Muslim region where everything is tribal, theocratic and terrorist at the same time) probably feel the same way about Huthi. But they may want to kill the Jews first.

Yemen’s Sheikh Abd Al-Azim Al-Huthi has declared that the jihad against the “Houthi infidels”, the Shiite sect in Yemen that has been waging a civil war against the government over the past decade, “is better than the jihad against the Jews.” because these Shiite rebels “are enemies of Allah and His Messenger”

“It does not make sense to fight the Jews as long as the Houthi group exists,” said Sheikh Huthi.

Don’t worry – the Houthis won’t become Judeophiles any time soon. Their logo says “Allah is Great, Death to America, Death to Israel, Damn the Jews, Power to Islam.”

Just in case “Death to Israel” was considered too vague, they threw a “Damn the Jews” there.

There are about 90 Jews left in Yemen living behind barbed wire. From a formerly huge community. So there aren’t that many of them left to damn. But apparently damning Jews comes before power to Islam.

Do the Houthi think that Huthi has to be killed before they kill the Jews? Based on their motto, they probably support killing Americans first. I don’t know if that makes them “moderate” or “extremist.”

In any case, the Jews, Christians, Buddhists, Hindus and Atheists still make it into the Top 10 People to Jihad. Meanwhile Yemeni Sunnis and Shiites will go on killing each other. Except for those Houthi Shiites and Yemeni Sunnis who have traveled to Syria to kill each other there.

If it wasn’t for Israel… there would be peace in the Middle East.

  • Veracious_one

    In Yemen, Sheik Huthi says the Houthis have to be killed before the Jews.
    apparently there are a lot more of Houthis targets than Jewish targets available….Muslims revel at the opportunity to show off their slaughtering skills…so what if the targets just happen to be other Muslims….that has never stopped Muslims from their slaughtering ways….it’s what they do…

    • Daniel Greenfield

      Killing the Jews would show they are fit to lead the Muslim Ummah… so yes

      Whoever kills the Jews is the rightful heir of Mohammed

      • A Z

        Killing 60 odd Jews in Yemen would not prove anything except that the person doing the deed was despicable.

        It would not prove fitness to rule or prowess in battle. But it would show their hand not that they do not do that with every pronouncement they make.

    • defcon 4

      Maybe the 90 remaining Jews in Yemen are too well guarded, or too well hidden. After all, thinking is hard when you have jihad on your mind.

  • A Z

    “The Houthis, a Shiite sect/clan/militia (a common combination in the Muslim region where everything is tribal, theocratic and terrorist at the same time)”

    How did I not know this?

    I read the major daily newspapers and the national magazines such as Time and Newsweek. I was aware there was a North Yemen and a South Yemen and that they joined in 1990.

    And yet for all that reading I was ignorant. I have to take part of the blame. I still lay part of it on the liberal press. There is a reason why their publications are dying.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      The amount of subdivisions in a tribal society are effectively infinite.

      • Biff Henderson

        Old SicKMadMo had a mob,
        They all kill for Mo.
        And in this mob they had some agnates,
        They all kill for Mo.
        With an agnate, and an agnate there,
        Here an agnate, there an agnate,
        Everywhere an agnate,
        Old Sick MadMO had a mob,
        They all kill for Mo.

        • A Z

          Biff

          I had seen the adjective agnatic in relation to agnatic succession (Salic Succession).

          The wiki entry is really interesting especially the part about Galen.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnate

          There is a lesson there. You can make gains, but you can also lose them. Women gained inheritance rights in the Middle Republic on to lose them under the Lex Voconia only to regain them in the middle empire period.

          The entry point out that knowledge might have been key. Galen expounded a different theory of genetic inheritance than Aristotle.

          We might ask what is genetic inheritance. There are somewhere between 30 to 60 genetic mutations per generation. Most or benign.

          Point is whether the kids are like their parent or not they are still your kid, but just because someone is pf a different patrilineal/matrilineal line does not mean you should treat them like sh_t, if you can get away with it.
          But that is where excessive tribalism leads us.

          • Biff Henderson

            Cut and paste snippets on Arab tribalism w/o attribute -

            Islam…in layman’s terms- Unfortunately, peace is never achieved, as in these 100% states, the most radical Muslims intimidate, spew hatred, and satisfy their blood lust by killing less radical Muslims for a variety of reasons.

            QUOTE:
            “Before I was nine, I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother
            against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; the tribe against the world, and all of us against the infidel.”

            Tribalism
            Each person counting on paternal relatives (called agnates) for protection and forming agnates outside the family structure that give you numerical superiority when confronting each other.

            The Middle East lacks abstract principles by which to measure actions “against general criteria, irrespective of the affiliation of particular actors.” Instead, intense particularism requires a family member to support a closer relative against a farther one, regardless of who may be at fault. Tribesmen and subjects, not citizens, populate the region. That most Middle Easterners retain this us-versus-them mentality dooms universalism, the rule of law, and constitutionalism. Trapped by these ancient patterns, Salzman writes, Middle Eastern societies “perform poorly by most social, cultural, economic, and political criteria.” As the region fails to modernize, it falls steadily further
            behind.

            • Marrying one’s daughters to cousins, as a way for the family to benefit from their fertility.

            • Practicing polygyny, so as to benefit from the fertility of
            multiple women.

            • Scrutinizing other families’ females, hoping to catch them in an immoral act, thereby compelling their men-folk to kill them and forfeit their fertility.

          • A Z

            Tribalism
            … forming de facto agnates

            So true

            Mawali

            “. The influx of non-Arab converts to Islam created a new difficulty in incorporating them into tribal Arab society. The solution appeared to be the contract of wala’, through which the non-Arab Muslims acquired an Arab patron.” -wiki

            The converts also acquire a fictional patrilineal history in some cases.

            Acquiring a fictional patrilineal line is to insult all your ancestors. It is to say they were not worthy.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mawali

  • Softly Bob

    Good news, as far as I’m concerned. Whenever as the savages enact jihad against one another, they have less time to enact jihad against us.

    Shia v. Sunni, Huthi vs. Houthi, Raghead I versus Raghead II – it’s all the same to me.

  • http://elderofziyon.blogspot.com Elder of Ziyon

    BTW, sometimes the Houthi slogan is translated as “F*** the Jews.”

    • Gee

      The phrase “Allah is great” is not correct either. It is “Our Allah is greater”

  • Drakken

    Sit back, grab a bourbon or your favorite beverage and watch as the savages tear each other to pieces, in fact we can always encourage them by telling them the tribe next door just slept with the sheiks daughter and let the carnage reign.

    • UCSPanther

      As my Dad says, these idiots cannot organize a one-man race to a two-hole outhouse…