<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ian Lustick’s Hilarious New York Times Call for a One State Solution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 17:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Pseudonews</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5390396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pseudonews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2014 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5390396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is some of the worst journalism I&#039;ve ever read.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is some of the worst journalism I&#8217;ve ever read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Glick</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5332154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tommy Glick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5332154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lustick works for US intelligence, (i.e. he&#039;s an institutionally headpatted Jew because he supports the genocide of Jews).  Thus, he&#039;ll always be prominently featured in the media, in panels, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lustick works for US intelligence, (i.e. he&#8217;s an institutionally headpatted Jew because he supports the genocide of Jews).  Thus, he&#8217;ll always be prominently featured in the media, in panels, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5285176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5285176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ian Lustick has once again confirmed to the world that he is an idiot. Thanks for the reminder, Ian!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian Lustick has once again confirmed to the world that he is an idiot. Thanks for the reminder, Ian!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kertitor</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5279070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kertitor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5279070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are not alone]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are not alone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kertitor</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5279068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kertitor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5279068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can not comprehend how the brain of this &quot;progressive&quot; Jews work. At the moment they are the useful idiots. Very soon they will be useless idiots and we all know what Hitler did to idiots.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can not comprehend how the brain of this &#8220;progressive&#8221; Jews work. At the moment they are the useful idiots. Very soon they will be useless idiots and we all know what Hitler did to idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moonstruck</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5278560</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moonstruck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2013 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5278560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I happen to know Ian personally, as he was, until recently, a member of our synagogue. (I was told that he was asked to leave his previous synagogue because of his outrageous assertions re Israel.) I don&#039;t understand why Penn thinks so highly of him, especially when I&#039;ve heard other scholars in the field (from different Ivy League institutions) scoff at his so-called scholarship. What I have found distressing is that, because he is Jewish, he&#039;s been on at least one panel representing the Jewish view of the Arab-Israeli conflict. (The one I know about occurred at VIllanova University, an ultra-conservative Catholic institution which is virulently anti-Israel.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happen to know Ian personally, as he was, until recently, a member of our synagogue. (I was told that he was asked to leave his previous synagogue because of his outrageous assertions re Israel.) I don&#8217;t understand why Penn thinks so highly of him, especially when I&#8217;ve heard other scholars in the field (from different Ivy League institutions) scoff at his so-called scholarship. What I have found distressing is that, because he is Jewish, he&#8217;s been on at least one panel representing the Jewish view of the Arab-Israeli conflict. (The one I know about occurred at VIllanova University, an ultra-conservative Catholic institution which is virulently anti-Israel.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yuval</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5277251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yuval]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5277251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lustig is similar to the two thirds of american Jew2s who wish Israel had never been established because its uncomfortable to be told his &quot;next year in Jerusalem&quot; is phony. He ignores the outcome of the single state solution offered by Britain 1922-1947 : Bloodshed at which end the Jews remained and Arabs ran. They ran because they never belonged]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lustig is similar to the two thirds of american Jew2s who wish Israel had never been established because its uncomfortable to be told his &#8220;next year in Jerusalem&#8221; is phony. He ignores the outcome of the single state solution offered by Britain 1922-1947 : Bloodshed at which end the Jews remained and Arabs ran. They ran because they never belonged</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mitch gold</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5277206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mitch gold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5277206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the Arab world in turmoil and Assad gassing Syrians why must the New York TImes offer a denigration of Zionism on the front page of its op-ed section?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the Arab world in turmoil and Assad gassing Syrians why must the New York TImes offer a denigration of Zionism on the front page of its op-ed section?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kelso</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5276850</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Kelso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5276850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another article about this.


Gogle this. 

Moronic or Sadistic? On Joseph Levine’s (and the NYT’s) Moral Cruelty

APRIL 11, 2013 RICHARD LANDES 16 COMMENTS

A month ago, the NYT published a piece by another “as-a-Jew” singling out Israel for special (negative) treatment. It’s been addressed by at least four other commentators: Avi Bell at The Times of Israel, Elder of Ziyonat his blog, Jonathan Tobin at Commentary, and Vic Rosenthal at FresnoZionism. The outsider will consider this list a roundup of “right-wing” Israel-firsters, which is too bad because they’re responding to an Israel-laster, eager to curry favor with genuinely right-wing regressives, masquerading as a good progressive willing to be self-critical and to sacrifice his “own” interests (a “Jewish” state) for the sake of world peace.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another article about this.</p>
<p>Gogle this. </p>
<p>Moronic or Sadistic? On Joseph Levine’s (and the NYT’s) Moral Cruelty</p>
<p>APRIL 11, 2013 RICHARD LANDES 16 COMMENTS</p>
<p>A month ago, the NYT published a piece by another “as-a-Jew” singling out Israel for special (negative) treatment. It’s been addressed by at least four other commentators: Avi Bell at The Times of Israel, Elder of Ziyonat his blog, Jonathan Tobin at Commentary, and Vic Rosenthal at FresnoZionism. The outsider will consider this list a roundup of “right-wing” Israel-firsters, which is too bad because they’re responding to an Israel-laster, eager to curry favor with genuinely right-wing regressives, masquerading as a good progressive willing to be self-critical and to sacrifice his “own” interests (a “Jewish” state) for the sake of world peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kelso</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5276849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Kelso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 03:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5276849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NY Times strikes again with their anti Israel professors writing op eds.
Ian Lustick is another radical nut job who wants Israel eliminated.

Does anyone forget this professor the Times had write an Op Ed this year.

Any Israel hater the Times loves to quote.

-------------------------------------------------------
Sunday, March 10, 2013
Another pseudo-scholarly attempt to delegitimize Israel in NYT

The New York Times Opinionator column yesterdayis from Joseph Levine, professor of philosophy at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

He argues that Jews, as a people, have no right to a state.

The core of his argument:

So, when we consider whether or not a people has a right to a state of their own, are we speaking of a people in the ethnic sense or the civic one? I contend that insofar as the principle that all peoples have the right to self-determination entails the right to a state of their own, it can apply to peoples only in the civic sense.

After all, what is it for a people to have a state “of their own”? Here’s a rough characterization: the formal institutions and legal framework of the state serves to express, encourage and favor that people’s identity. The distinctive position of that people would be manifested in a number of ways, from the largely symbolic to the more substantive: for example, it would be reflected in the name of the state, the nature of its flag and other symbols, its national holidays, its education system, its immigration rules, the extent to which membership in the people in question is a factor in official planning, how resources are distributed, etc. If the people being favored in this way are just the state’s citizens, it is not a problem. 

But if the people who “own” the state in question are an ethnic sub-group of the citizenry, even if the vast majority, it constitutes a serious problem indeed, and this is precisely the situation of Israel as the Jewish state. Far from being a natural expression of the Jewish people’s right to self-determination, it is in fact a violation of the right to self-determination of its non-Jewish (mainly Palestinian) citizens. It is a violation of a people’s right to self-determination to exclude them — whether by virtue of their ethnic membership, or for any other reason — from full political participation in the state under whose sovereignty they fall. Of course Jews have a right to self-determination in this sense as well — this is what emancipation was all about. But so do non-Jewish peoples living in the same state.

Any state that “belongs” to one ethnic group within it violates the core democratic principle of equality, and the self-determination rights of the non-members of that group.

I conclude, then, that the very idea of a Jewish state is undemocratic, a violation of the self-determination rights of its non-Jewish citizens, and therefore morally problematic. But the harm doesn’t stop with the inherently undemocratic character of the state. For if an ethnic national state is established in a territory that contains a significant number of non-members of that ethnic group, it will inevitably face resistance from the land’s other inhabitants.If we accept that Levine&#039;s arguments are correct, every single state in the Western Hemisphere, as well as Australia and others, have no right to exist - because there is a minority (no matter how small, in Levine&#039;s characterization) who are indigenous residents whose own self-determination is fatally wounded by the existence of these states.

Apparently, Levine he feels that only Jews are violating the rights of other peoples.

By Levine&#039;s definition, Kurds and Armenians and Tibetans and anyone else who wants to exercise self-determination would also be acting illegitimately if there is even a small group of people not belonging to those groups on the lands they claim.

In fact, if you follow his bizarre logic, while &quot;of course Jews have a right to self-determination,&quot; in no practical way can that right be exercised. What kind of a right is it when it is hamstrung by definition?

Levine&#039;s logical fallacy is that one&#039;s right to self-determination is illegitimate if it happens to compete with anyone else&#039;s similar right. This is something he simply made up. A people&#039;s right to self-determination is independent of others&#039; rights. Unless there is a new continent that is discovered, by definition everyone&#039;s rights to self-determination is going to interfere with others&#039;.

Given this reality, what can a people who aspire to self-determination do? They grant the maximum rights possible to the minority population, without giving up on their own rights. The minority population can make a decision to live with these rights - and fight to increase them within a society that hopefully is democratic and tolerant - or, if appropriate, they can choose to move to an area where they are the majority and can practice their own rights to self-determination freely, similarly granting maximal rights to their own minority groups. 

Levine is essentially engaging in a sophisticated form of anti-semitism, where by his definition only the Jewish people&#039;s rights must be subsumed to the rights of others; the others are not limited by any means that he sees fit to mention. 

Also unmentioned by Levine is the small fact that every Arab country defines itself as either &quot;Arab&quot; or &quot;Muslim&quot; or both in their constitutions, thus being just as guilty as Israel of infringing on minority rights - and therefore being just as non-deserving of statehood. 

Levine lets the veil fall from his own pretense of objectivity when he states 

[I]f an ethnic national state is established in a territory that contains a significant number of non-members of that ethnic group, it will inevitably face resistance from the land’s other inhabitants. This will force the ethnic nation controlling the state to resort to further undemocratic means to maintain their hegemony. Three strategies to deal with resistance are common: expulsion, occupation and institutional marginalization. Interestingly, all three strategies have been employed by the Zionist movement: expulsion in 1948 (and, to a lesser extent, in 1967), occupation of the territories conquered in 1967 and institution of a complex web of laws that prevent Israel’s Palestinian citizens from mounting an internal challenge to the Jewish character of the state.This statement is so a-historic, and so wedded to the anti-Israel narrative, that Levine&#039;s anti-Israel bias is revealed in all its ugliness. 

Only the most rabid anti-Zionist claims that Israel forcefully expelled Arabs in 1948 in order to maintain a Jewish majority - in fact, the vast majority of Arabs fled on their own. 

There were essentially no expulsions in 1967 to outside the territories. 

Moreover, Levine absurdly characterizes the attacks on Israel from Jordan and Syria in 1967 as &quot;resistance,&quot; which would be laughable if he weren&#039;t a professor at a prestigious institution.

Finally, Israeli efforts to maintain itself as a Jewish state - practicing that very same self-determination that Levine pretends that Jews have - is described negatively, a &quot;complex set of laws&quot; meant only to make Arabs into second-class citizens. 

As the Arabs so, Levine is looking at everything Israel does through an anti-Israel lens, not even considering the idea that Jews indeed do have national rights on their historic homeland. Even worse, he does not admit that Israel bends over backwards to give rights to its Arab minority beyond those given in states where they are the majority. No, to Levine, Jewish nationhood (and apparently only Jewish nationhood) is inherently racist.

Sorry, but this is not a serious essay that advocates for equal rights. This is a hate-filled screed that is dressed up in academic garb. the NYT&#039;s decision to run this shows that they are easily seduced by quasi-academic arguments that are simply disguises for anti-Israel hate.

Another pseudo-scholarly attempt to delegitimize Israel in NYT
The New York Times Opinionator column yesterday is from Joseph Levine, professor of philosophy at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
He argues that Jews, as a people, have no right to a state.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NY Times strikes again with their anti Israel professors writing op eds.<br />
Ian Lustick is another radical nut job who wants Israel eliminated.</p>
<p>Does anyone forget this professor the Times had write an Op Ed this year.</p>
<p>Any Israel hater the Times loves to quote.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Sunday, March 10, 2013<br />
Another pseudo-scholarly attempt to delegitimize Israel in NYT</p>
<p>The New York Times Opinionator column yesterdayis from Joseph Levine, professor of philosophy at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.</p>
<p>He argues that Jews, as a people, have no right to a state.</p>
<p>The core of his argument:</p>
<p>So, when we consider whether or not a people has a right to a state of their own, are we speaking of a people in the ethnic sense or the civic one? I contend that insofar as the principle that all peoples have the right to self-determination entails the right to a state of their own, it can apply to peoples only in the civic sense.</p>
<p>After all, what is it for a people to have a state “of their own”? Here’s a rough characterization: the formal institutions and legal framework of the state serves to express, encourage and favor that people’s identity. The distinctive position of that people would be manifested in a number of ways, from the largely symbolic to the more substantive: for example, it would be reflected in the name of the state, the nature of its flag and other symbols, its national holidays, its education system, its immigration rules, the extent to which membership in the people in question is a factor in official planning, how resources are distributed, etc. If the people being favored in this way are just the state’s citizens, it is not a problem. </p>
<p>But if the people who “own” the state in question are an ethnic sub-group of the citizenry, even if the vast majority, it constitutes a serious problem indeed, and this is precisely the situation of Israel as the Jewish state. Far from being a natural expression of the Jewish people’s right to self-determination, it is in fact a violation of the right to self-determination of its non-Jewish (mainly Palestinian) citizens. It is a violation of a people’s right to self-determination to exclude them — whether by virtue of their ethnic membership, or for any other reason — from full political participation in the state under whose sovereignty they fall. Of course Jews have a right to self-determination in this sense as well — this is what emancipation was all about. But so do non-Jewish peoples living in the same state.</p>
<p>Any state that “belongs” to one ethnic group within it violates the core democratic principle of equality, and the self-determination rights of the non-members of that group.</p>
<p>I conclude, then, that the very idea of a Jewish state is undemocratic, a violation of the self-determination rights of its non-Jewish citizens, and therefore morally problematic. But the harm doesn’t stop with the inherently undemocratic character of the state. For if an ethnic national state is established in a territory that contains a significant number of non-members of that ethnic group, it will inevitably face resistance from the land’s other inhabitants.If we accept that Levine&#8217;s arguments are correct, every single state in the Western Hemisphere, as well as Australia and others, have no right to exist &#8211; because there is a minority (no matter how small, in Levine&#8217;s characterization) who are indigenous residents whose own self-determination is fatally wounded by the existence of these states.</p>
<p>Apparently, Levine he feels that only Jews are violating the rights of other peoples.</p>
<p>By Levine&#8217;s definition, Kurds and Armenians and Tibetans and anyone else who wants to exercise self-determination would also be acting illegitimately if there is even a small group of people not belonging to those groups on the lands they claim.</p>
<p>In fact, if you follow his bizarre logic, while &#8220;of course Jews have a right to self-determination,&#8221; in no practical way can that right be exercised. What kind of a right is it when it is hamstrung by definition?</p>
<p>Levine&#8217;s logical fallacy is that one&#8217;s right to self-determination is illegitimate if it happens to compete with anyone else&#8217;s similar right. This is something he simply made up. A people&#8217;s right to self-determination is independent of others&#8217; rights. Unless there is a new continent that is discovered, by definition everyone&#8217;s rights to self-determination is going to interfere with others&#8217;.</p>
<p>Given this reality, what can a people who aspire to self-determination do? They grant the maximum rights possible to the minority population, without giving up on their own rights. The minority population can make a decision to live with these rights &#8211; and fight to increase them within a society that hopefully is democratic and tolerant &#8211; or, if appropriate, they can choose to move to an area where they are the majority and can practice their own rights to self-determination freely, similarly granting maximal rights to their own minority groups. </p>
<p>Levine is essentially engaging in a sophisticated form of anti-semitism, where by his definition only the Jewish people&#8217;s rights must be subsumed to the rights of others; the others are not limited by any means that he sees fit to mention. </p>
<p>Also unmentioned by Levine is the small fact that every Arab country defines itself as either &#8220;Arab&#8221; or &#8220;Muslim&#8221; or both in their constitutions, thus being just as guilty as Israel of infringing on minority rights &#8211; and therefore being just as non-deserving of statehood. </p>
<p>Levine lets the veil fall from his own pretense of objectivity when he states </p>
<p>[I]f an ethnic national state is established in a territory that contains a significant number of non-members of that ethnic group, it will inevitably face resistance from the land’s other inhabitants. This will force the ethnic nation controlling the state to resort to further undemocratic means to maintain their hegemony. Three strategies to deal with resistance are common: expulsion, occupation and institutional marginalization. Interestingly, all three strategies have been employed by the Zionist movement: expulsion in 1948 (and, to a lesser extent, in 1967), occupation of the territories conquered in 1967 and institution of a complex web of laws that prevent Israel’s Palestinian citizens from mounting an internal challenge to the Jewish character of the state.This statement is so a-historic, and so wedded to the anti-Israel narrative, that Levine&#8217;s anti-Israel bias is revealed in all its ugliness. </p>
<p>Only the most rabid anti-Zionist claims that Israel forcefully expelled Arabs in 1948 in order to maintain a Jewish majority &#8211; in fact, the vast majority of Arabs fled on their own. </p>
<p>There were essentially no expulsions in 1967 to outside the territories. </p>
<p>Moreover, Levine absurdly characterizes the attacks on Israel from Jordan and Syria in 1967 as &#8220;resistance,&#8221; which would be laughable if he weren&#8217;t a professor at a prestigious institution.</p>
<p>Finally, Israeli efforts to maintain itself as a Jewish state &#8211; practicing that very same self-determination that Levine pretends that Jews have &#8211; is described negatively, a &#8220;complex set of laws&#8221; meant only to make Arabs into second-class citizens. </p>
<p>As the Arabs so, Levine is looking at everything Israel does through an anti-Israel lens, not even considering the idea that Jews indeed do have national rights on their historic homeland. Even worse, he does not admit that Israel bends over backwards to give rights to its Arab minority beyond those given in states where they are the majority. No, to Levine, Jewish nationhood (and apparently only Jewish nationhood) is inherently racist.</p>
<p>Sorry, but this is not a serious essay that advocates for equal rights. This is a hate-filled screed that is dressed up in academic garb. the NYT&#8217;s decision to run this shows that they are easily seduced by quasi-academic arguments that are simply disguises for anti-Israel hate.</p>
<p>Another pseudo-scholarly attempt to delegitimize Israel in NYT<br />
The New York Times Opinionator column yesterday is from Joseph Levine, professor of philosophy at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.<br />
He argues that Jews, as a people, have no right to a state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5276786</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5276786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can think of a workable one-state solution, but he wouldn&#039;t like it. Neither would a single jihadi.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can think of a workable one-state solution, but he wouldn&#8217;t like it. Neither would a single jihadi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5276785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 01:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5276785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Does the NYT building have a checkpoint, to screen people wanting to enter its offices? You bet.&quot;





Hypocrites suck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Does the NYT building have a checkpoint, to screen people wanting to enter its offices? You bet.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hypocrites suck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5276774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 01:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5276774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry to post an off-topic comment but about 50% of my replies to a certain bird on crack are getting deleted without so much as a warning about it. I return to see that they are not posted.


It only happens to him, and it happens on about 50% of the comments, not attempts. Even if I change my comment completely in order to test it, there are comments of his that I&#039;m totally blocked from replying to.


It may be an extraordinary and fascinating glitch but someone needs to look in to this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to post an off-topic comment but about 50% of my replies to a certain bird on crack are getting deleted without so much as a warning about it. I return to see that they are not posted.</p>
<p>It only happens to him, and it happens on about 50% of the comments, not attempts. Even if I change my comment completely in order to test it, there are comments of his that I&#8217;m totally blocked from replying to.</p>
<p>It may be an extraordinary and fascinating glitch but someone needs to look in to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reuven</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5276553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reuven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5276553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s what I had to say, with my many typos corrected: Lustick&#039;s op-ed was as vicious as it was absurd.  Pieces like his are why I have been boycotting The Times for years.  I only read it in libraries.  What he was calling for, in reality, was the annhilation of Israel...genocide, and nothing less than that. Lusticik is the personification of evil, or perhaps a blending of evil and stupidity.  In either case, he is a kapo of the lowest form.  Once again, I apologize for my many typos.  That sometimes happens to me when I type while being furious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what I had to say, with my many typos corrected: Lustick&#8217;s op-ed was as vicious as it was absurd.  Pieces like his are why I have been boycotting The Times for years.  I only read it in libraries.  What he was calling for, in reality, was the annhilation of Israel&#8230;genocide, and nothing less than that. Lusticik is the personification of evil, or perhaps a blending of evil and stupidity.  In either case, he is a kapo of the lowest form.  Once again, I apologize for my many typos.  That sometimes happens to me when I type while being furious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reuven</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5276542</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reuven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5276542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lustick&#039;s op-e was as vicious as it was absurd.  Pieces liker his are why I have been boycotting The Tinmes for years.  I only read it in libraries.  What he wasa in calling for, in rweality wss the annhilstion of Israel...gernocide, and nothing less than that.  Lustick is the persdonification of eviol, or perhsaps a blending of msalevolence and stupidity.  In either case, he is a kapo of the lowest form.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lustick&#8217;s op-e was as vicious as it was absurd.  Pieces liker his are why I have been boycotting The Tinmes for years.  I only read it in libraries.  What he wasa in calling for, in rweality wss the annhilstion of Israel&#8230;gernocide, and nothing less than that.  Lustick is the persdonification of eviol, or perhsaps a blending of msalevolence and stupidity.  In either case, he is a kapo of the lowest form.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeShawn</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5276539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DeShawn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5276539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting all the damn jews out of the Middle East will solve so many problems, it&#039;s isn&#039;t even funny. One jew-free state over there called Palestine and the US will be a lot better off. Then we gotta work on getting the jews out of the US government. Seperation of synagogue and state!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting all the damn jews out of the Middle East will solve so many problems, it&#8217;s isn&#8217;t even funny. One jew-free state over there called Palestine and the US will be a lot better off. Then we gotta work on getting the jews out of the US government. Seperation of synagogue and state!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: defcon 4</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5276500</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[defcon 4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5276500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s a worse place than California?
Dearbornistan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s a worse place than California?<br />
Dearbornistan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athling</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5276481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Athling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5276481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can the lion and leopard share the same pen? Mr. Lustick puts his lack of understanding on full display. A One State Solution cannot work. A Two State Solution could work but there are many problems here also.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can the lion and leopard share the same pen? Mr. Lustick puts his lack of understanding on full display. A One State Solution cannot work. A Two State Solution could work but there are many problems here also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gee</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5276471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5276471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leave it to an American to attempt to dictate Israeli policy. He is unwilling to bet his life on his ideas, but millions of Israelis - that&#039;s okay.


I propose that we return to international law and a two-state solution. Israel with 22.5% of the original Mandate territories and the Arabs in Jordan with the other 77.5%. Even though Israel has a population equal to that of Jordan plus their colonists it is enough for us]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave it to an American to attempt to dictate Israeli policy. He is unwilling to bet his life on his ideas, but millions of Israelis &#8211; that&#8217;s okay.</p>
<p>I propose that we return to international law and a two-state solution. Israel with 22.5% of the original Mandate territories and the Arabs in Jordan with the other 77.5%. Even though Israel has a population equal to that of Jordan plus their colonists it is enough for us</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCREW SOCIALISM</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ian-lusticks-hilarious-new-york-times-call-for-a-one-state-solution/comment-page-1/#comment-5276465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SCREW SOCIALISM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204415#comment-5276465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;There’s a reason that Sefardi Jews are right wing. It’s because they’re 
familiar with the Middle East in a way that idiot American Ashkenazi 
liberals aren’t.&quot;

AND There’s a reason that RUSSIAN Jews are right wing. It’s because they’re 
intimately familiar with communism/socialism in a way that idiot American Ashkenazi socialist &quot;progressive&quot;/liberals aren’t.


Does the NYT building have a checkpoint, to screen people wanting to enter its offices?  You bet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There’s a reason that Sefardi Jews are right wing. It’s because they’re<br />
familiar with the Middle East in a way that idiot American Ashkenazi<br />
liberals aren’t.&#8221;</p>
<p>AND There’s a reason that RUSSIAN Jews are right wing. It’s because they’re<br />
intimately familiar with communism/socialism in a way that idiot American Ashkenazi socialist &#8220;progressive&#8221;/liberals aren’t.</p>
<p>Does the NYT building have a checkpoint, to screen people wanting to enter its offices?  You bet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 690/709 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 12:27:31 by W3 Total Cache -->