<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Gay Marriage Actually Different than Polygamy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4449895</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 08:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4449895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Marriage equality is not about having sex.&quot; 
 
Yes it is. You told me that they were born with sexual preferences that compel us to accommodate them. Are you changing your mind? This is no surprise because you&#039;ve never been coherent. 
 
&quot;You seem a bit hung up on that, if you don&#039;t mind me pointing that out.&quot; 
 
Yeah. I&#039;m hung up on straightening out stupidity. Your &quot;help&quot; isn&#039;t helping anyone. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Marriage equality is not about having sex.&quot; </p>
<p>Yes it is. You told me that they were born with sexual preferences that compel us to accommodate them. Are you changing your mind? This is no surprise because you&#039;ve never been coherent. </p>
<p>&quot;You seem a bit hung up on that, if you don&#039;t mind me pointing that out.&quot; </p>
<p>Yeah. I&#039;m hung up on straightening out stupidity. Your &quot;help&quot; isn&#039;t helping anyone. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4449886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 07:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4449886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Aren&#039;t you clever lil&#039; bigot,&quot; 
 
Good one, for a bird. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Aren&#039;t you clever lil&#039; bigot,&quot; </p>
<p>Good one, for a bird. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4449884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 07:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4449884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your stupidity doesn&#039;t embarrass me at all. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your stupidity doesn&#039;t embarrass me at all. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4449879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 07:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4449879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Yeah! Just keep the gays in the closet, becuse they scare Mary Sue, like most everything that is not in her tiny little comfort zone!&quot; 
 
Having a right is not the same as being compelled. You don&#039;t even know what it means to have rights from a sovereign.  
 
They already have equal rights. They want superior rights based on their particular fetishes. This has been established very easily for anyone who read the article and comments without a leftist mind-numbing bias. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Yeah! Just keep the gays in the closet, becuse they scare Mary Sue, like most everything that is not in her tiny little comfort zone!&quot; </p>
<p>Having a right is not the same as being compelled. You don&#039;t even know what it means to have rights from a sovereign.  </p>
<p>They already have equal rights. They want superior rights based on their particular fetishes. This has been established very easily for anyone who read the article and comments without a leftist mind-numbing bias. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4449871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 07:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4449871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Who says so, Mary Sue? Do you know gay people and have you discussed this with them?&quot; 
 
 
Let&#039;s ask you. Were you born this way or did your life experiences make you this absurd? Were you a retread from your earliest memories? 
 
Oh that was so useful. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Who says so, Mary Sue? Do you know gay people and have you discussed this with them?&quot; </p>
<p>Let&#039;s ask you. Were you born this way or did your life experiences make you this absurd? Were you a retread from your earliest memories? </p>
<p>Oh that was so useful. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4449867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 07:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4449867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Gay people are born homosexual. &quot; 
 
That is such BS. Most if not all sexual deviancy is caused by social interactions and life experiences. We&#039;re not even sure whether conventional sex requires the same kind of cultivation but it might. It&#039;s something worth exploring but your silly declaration marks you as indoctrinated...again. 
 
 
&quot;Whereas polygamy is a choice, not an ingrained part of ones biology.&quot; 
 
That is just an insane statement. There is far more evidence that it&#039;s more &quot;natural&quot; to have multiple heterosexual partners than to have any gay partners. You&#039;re just talking out your rear orifice...again. 
 
 
 
&quot;...an ingrained part of ones biology.&quot; 
 
 
We really need emoticons here and I need those eye-rolling versions badly. 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Gay people are born homosexual. &quot; </p>
<p>That is such BS. Most if not all sexual deviancy is caused by social interactions and life experiences. We&#039;re not even sure whether conventional sex requires the same kind of cultivation but it might. It&#039;s something worth exploring but your silly declaration marks you as indoctrinated&#8230;again. </p>
<p>&quot;Whereas polygamy is a choice, not an ingrained part of ones biology.&quot; </p>
<p>That is just an insane statement. There is far more evidence that it&#039;s more &quot;natural&quot; to have multiple heterosexual partners than to have any gay partners. You&#039;re just talking out your rear orifice&#8230;again. </p>
<p>&quot;&#8230;an ingrained part of ones biology.&quot; </p>
<p>We really need emoticons here and I need those eye-rolling versions badly. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4449856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 07:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4449856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;There is a difference between those things which fit outside the norm, and sexual deviancy. But for arguments sake, let&#039;s just agree that gays are &quot;deviant.&quot; So what? How would those &quot;deviants,&quot; committing to each other for life and not bothering you, be a bad thing to you?&quot; 
 
They want to wipe away distinctions, including the fact that it deviates from any possible natural child creation. You&#039;re not even supposed to mention that. The trend is to file hate speech claims for teaching any child (or mentioning in any context) that gays can&#039;t naturally birth children. 
 
That&#039;s how it is deviant. It&#039;s not a trivial statement in the context of this discussion. 
 
&quot;The future must not belong to those who &#039;slander&#039; the &#039;prophet&#039; of Islam or any other protected classes.&quot;  They just might riot you know. Change the laws before they riot. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;There is a difference between those things which fit outside the norm, and sexual deviancy. But for arguments sake, let&#039;s just agree that gays are &quot;deviant.&quot; So what? How would those &quot;deviants,&quot; committing to each other for life and not bothering you, be a bad thing to you?&quot; </p>
<p>They want to wipe away distinctions, including the fact that it deviates from any possible natural child creation. You&#039;re not even supposed to mention that. The trend is to file hate speech claims for teaching any child (or mentioning in any context) that gays can&#039;t naturally birth children. </p>
<p>That&#039;s how it is deviant. It&#039;s not a trivial statement in the context of this discussion. </p>
<p>&quot;The future must not belong to those who &#039;slander&#039; the &#039;prophet&#039; of Islam or any other protected classes.&quot;  They just might riot you know. Change the laws before they riot. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4449844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 07:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4449844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It IS about monogamy, which is much better for society than promiscuity (for lots of reasons).&quot; 
 
Who is stopping anyone from being monogamous? Riddle me that Batman. 
 
&quot;Anyway, I&#039;m not going to dignify the &quot;delusion lunatic&quot; comment (look at the definition of ad hominem attack)&quot; 
 
Your feelings were hurt. I just thought you might like to know your arguments are not rational. What they are is delusional. Still hurting? Try making rational statements and limiting your arguments in that way. 
 
It&#039;s always an appeal to the emotions. In leftist lunatic land that means you win because your feelings are hurt and now you&#039;re the victim. Never mind overcoming the logic of my statements.  
 
Why do gays need help from the state to be monogamous? Nobody does.  
 
Maybe we can say that for state mediated adoptions one must pass &quot;best interest of the child&quot; and as long as gays admit they are not generally as suitable for the task they can still apply and THEN if they win any adoption hearings they can get married too. What that will do is prevent bogus discrimination statistics based on the assumption that gays are just as suitable as parents. I&#039;m not even saying they&#039;re always unsuitable or that heteros are always more suitable. I&#039;m saying I know how the game works and I see affirmative action today as a very destructive principal and gay marriage simply expands the possible ways to abuse these false concepts of social justice through overly simplified statistics. 
 
Is that acceptable to you? Because that would solve every problem you claim to want to solve. 
 
This ought to be interesting to hear. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;It IS about monogamy, which is much better for society than promiscuity (for lots of reasons).&quot; </p>
<p>Who is stopping anyone from being monogamous? Riddle me that Batman. </p>
<p>&quot;Anyway, I&#039;m not going to dignify the &quot;delusion lunatic&quot; comment (look at the definition of ad hominem attack)&quot; </p>
<p>Your feelings were hurt. I just thought you might like to know your arguments are not rational. What they are is delusional. Still hurting? Try making rational statements and limiting your arguments in that way. </p>
<p>It&#039;s always an appeal to the emotions. In leftist lunatic land that means you win because your feelings are hurt and now you&#039;re the victim. Never mind overcoming the logic of my statements.  </p>
<p>Why do gays need help from the state to be monogamous? Nobody does.  </p>
<p>Maybe we can say that for state mediated adoptions one must pass &quot;best interest of the child&quot; and as long as gays admit they are not generally as suitable for the task they can still apply and THEN if they win any adoption hearings they can get married too. What that will do is prevent bogus discrimination statistics based on the assumption that gays are just as suitable as parents. I&#039;m not even saying they&#039;re always unsuitable or that heteros are always more suitable. I&#039;m saying I know how the game works and I see affirmative action today as a very destructive principal and gay marriage simply expands the possible ways to abuse these false concepts of social justice through overly simplified statistics. </p>
<p>Is that acceptable to you? Because that would solve every problem you claim to want to solve. </p>
<p>This ought to be interesting to hear. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4446847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4446847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;In other words, Object, you&#039;re just another frightened, ignorant hater. Don&#039;t worry, you&#039;re type is quickly dying off.&quot; 
 
Anyone that fails to go along with the leftist Utopian revolution is a certified hateful racist nazi right wing blood sucking b stard. 
 
I think I&#039;ve heard that before. Why would I care what delusional people think? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;In other words, Object, you&#039;re just another frightened, ignorant hater. Don&#039;t worry, you&#039;re type is quickly dying off.&quot; </p>
<p>Anyone that fails to go along with the leftist Utopian revolution is a certified hateful racist nazi right wing blood sucking b stard. </p>
<p>I think I&#039;ve heard that before. Why would I care what delusional people think? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4446842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4446842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;There is no law banning couples with no desire or ability to raise children from getting married.&quot; 
 
Should there be? Who will decide who has desire or ability? Most marriage have that possibility and it does no harm for kids to be introduced to childless couples for example. If you want that as your &quot;standard of fairness&quot; you are again unfamiliar with the fact that the world is imperfect. We&#039;re not trying to make it perfect. We&#039;re just trying to find the best possible real options. 
 
Not that you&#039;d recognize the distinctions between reality and delusion, because you know you don&#039;t know up from down. 
 
&quot;In regard to the first set of issues (property rights, etc.) there is a whole host of complications with polygamy, bestiality, and the like. There are none in regard to sex. It  
makes no difference if the couple is male/female or of the same sex.&quot; 
 
Property rights belong first to individuals. Individuals may share those rights already. You&#039;re a retread repeating talking points of other deluded leftists. You don&#039;t even understand your own arguments.  
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;There is no law banning couples with no desire or ability to raise children from getting married.&quot; </p>
<p>Should there be? Who will decide who has desire or ability? Most marriage have that possibility and it does no harm for kids to be introduced to childless couples for example. If you want that as your &quot;standard of fairness&quot; you are again unfamiliar with the fact that the world is imperfect. We&#039;re not trying to make it perfect. We&#039;re just trying to find the best possible real options. </p>
<p>Not that you&#039;d recognize the distinctions between reality and delusion, because you know you don&#039;t know up from down. </p>
<p>&quot;In regard to the first set of issues (property rights, etc.) there is a whole host of complications with polygamy, bestiality, and the like. There are none in regard to sex. It<br />
makes no difference if the couple is male/female or of the same sex.&quot; </p>
<p>Property rights belong first to individuals. Individuals may share those rights already. You&#039;re a retread repeating talking points of other deluded leftists. You don&#039;t even understand your own arguments.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4446833</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4446833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The state has an interest in couples not just because of children, but for reasons for taxes, transfer of wealth and benefits, rights for a spouse to be involved in end of life care issues, immigration rights, etc. &quot; 
 
The state has an interest in its citizens and their activities. Gay marriage doesn&#039;t solve any problems. It just creates new ones. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;The state has an interest in couples not just because of children, but for reasons for taxes, transfer of wealth and benefits, rights for a spouse to be involved in end of life care issues, immigration rights, etc. &quot; </p>
<p>The state has an interest in its citizens and their activities. Gay marriage doesn&#039;t solve any problems. It just creates new ones. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4446830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4446830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;While the specifics differ somewhat, the parallels between segregation and opposing gay rights are fairly obvious.&quot; 
 
Obvious to you but not even salient. You&#039;re totally delusional. You&#039;ve heard this argument work in front of other deluded leftists. 
 
&quot;It is easy in hindsight to say that segregation was wrong.&quot; 
 
Every non-indoctrinated person knew segregation was wrong. 
 
&quot;I happen to live in an area where gay rights is generally supported. The end result?&quot; 
 
You&#039;ve been indoctrinated. By the way, don&#039;t bother trying to become a trial lawyer. 
 
&quot;Real life is trumping your ideology against gays. &quot; 
 
There are many evil ideas out there based on ideology. Narcissism is called other things. If you&#039;ve already convinced enough of the mob to take over with your revolution then you don&#039;t need to convince anyone else, now do you? 
 
&quot;Talk to the American Association of Pediatrics about whether marriage equality is best for children: 
 
I know exactly what they&#039;ll say and it won&#039;t be the compelling endorsement you want to imagine. It&#039;s better for the kids that are already stuck in that hell, and worse for the future kids who could have otherwise had a better situation. 
 
You just can&#039;t accept that. Even if you believe that gays have a right to marry you just can&#039;t admit to any pitfalls. The world will be a better place in every way as soon as gays can marry. 
 
You&#039;re completely deluded and can&#039;t even think for yourself. This conversation proved that to anyone who read it with comprehension.  
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;While the specifics differ somewhat, the parallels between segregation and opposing gay rights are fairly obvious.&quot; </p>
<p>Obvious to you but not even salient. You&#039;re totally delusional. You&#039;ve heard this argument work in front of other deluded leftists. </p>
<p>&quot;It is easy in hindsight to say that segregation was wrong.&quot; </p>
<p>Every non-indoctrinated person knew segregation was wrong. </p>
<p>&quot;I happen to live in an area where gay rights is generally supported. The end result?&quot; </p>
<p>You&#039;ve been indoctrinated. By the way, don&#039;t bother trying to become a trial lawyer. </p>
<p>&quot;Real life is trumping your ideology against gays. &quot; </p>
<p>There are many evil ideas out there based on ideology. Narcissism is called other things. If you&#039;ve already convinced enough of the mob to take over with your revolution then you don&#039;t need to convince anyone else, now do you? </p>
<p>&quot;Talk to the American Association of Pediatrics about whether marriage equality is best for children: </p>
<p>I know exactly what they&#039;ll say and it won&#039;t be the compelling endorsement you want to imagine. It&#039;s better for the kids that are already stuck in that hell, and worse for the future kids who could have otherwise had a better situation. </p>
<p>You just can&#039;t accept that. Even if you believe that gays have a right to marry you just can&#039;t admit to any pitfalls. The world will be a better place in every way as soon as gays can marry. </p>
<p>You&#039;re completely deluded and can&#039;t even think for yourself. This conversation proved that to anyone who read it with comprehension.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4446813</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 10:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4446813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Gays can and do raise children, and that is the incontrovertible fact that matters.&quot; 
 
 
So can 12-year-olds, but we have standards determined by what&#039;s in the best interests of the children. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Gays can and do raise children, and that is the incontrovertible fact that matters.&quot; </p>
<p>So can 12-year-olds, but we have standards determined by what&#039;s in the best interests of the children. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4446809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 10:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4446809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Interesting, if you want to carry this parallel further, do you support criminalizing homosexuality?&quot; 
 
Obviously you can&#039;t read with comprehension. I&#039;ve already said that I have no stake in what 2 or more consenting adults do with their sex lives and many other liberties. 
 
&quot;BTW, that sill never happen again.&quot; 
 
Then what are you worried about? 
 
&quot;Bereft of any plausible discriminatory alternative, you are left with simply blocking the road to a logical end point (equal rights). &quot; 
 
It&#039;s getting more obvious that you can&#039;t read with comprehension. 
 
&quot;However, imbedded in your talking points is an animus toward gays, and a wishful goal to return to a discriminatory past that is rapidly disappearing (none too soon).&quot; 
 
 
I have an animus towards prima donna cry babies with nothing legitimate to cry about, yet the tears still keep flowing and the lines of victims keeps getting longer and longer. I resent the present day gay political movement. I have no worries about what gays do until they act like victims when they&#039;re not. I have no problems with leftists until they start causing trouble with their insane delusions. 
 
Leftists are a far bigger problem than the political gays and I&#039;d marry any gay man who could get rid of the leftists from this country. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Interesting, if you want to carry this parallel further, do you support criminalizing homosexuality?&quot; </p>
<p>Obviously you can&#039;t read with comprehension. I&#039;ve already said that I have no stake in what 2 or more consenting adults do with their sex lives and many other liberties. </p>
<p>&quot;BTW, that sill never happen again.&quot; </p>
<p>Then what are you worried about? </p>
<p>&quot;Bereft of any plausible discriminatory alternative, you are left with simply blocking the road to a logical end point (equal rights). &quot; </p>
<p>It&#039;s getting more obvious that you can&#039;t read with comprehension. </p>
<p>&quot;However, imbedded in your talking points is an animus toward gays, and a wishful goal to return to a discriminatory past that is rapidly disappearing (none too soon).&quot; </p>
<p>I have an animus towards prima donna cry babies with nothing legitimate to cry about, yet the tears still keep flowing and the lines of victims keeps getting longer and longer. I resent the present day gay political movement. I have no worries about what gays do until they act like victims when they&#039;re not. I have no problems with leftists until they start causing trouble with their insane delusions. </p>
<p>Leftists are a far bigger problem than the political gays and I&#039;d marry any gay man who could get rid of the leftists from this country. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4446797</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 10:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4446797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Millions of people believe that monogamy is better than promiscuity, for a large number of reasons.&quot; 
 
A large number of purely subjective reasons. And we&#039;re not talking about personal choice but whether the state needs to regulate and promote a new kind of &quot;marriage&quot; based on special kinds of &quot;equality.&quot; 
 
&quot;Ask Rob Portman, or all of the Republicans who support SSM for the exact reason that it IS a conservative ideal.&quot; 
 
Sure. Conserve hypocrisy. OK. Whatever. 
 
&quot;You are raising a sarcastic straw man argument.&quot; 
 
Not. 
 
&quot;There are people just as conservative as you, you believe that monogamy is such a strong ideal that gay couples shouldn&#039;t be precluded from it. &quot; 
 
Totally false. How am I excluding anyone from being monogamous? You&#039;re absurd. You don&#039;t even make sense. If you&#039;d read your own claims with an open mind you&#039;d see your arguments are circular and dependent on positions you took entirely for emotional reasons. You were indoctrinated before you ever had a chance to think about anything we&#039;re discussing. 
 
News flash, I once thought gay marriage was harmless until I waded through the nonsense and considered the real consequences. I&#039;m not a politician so it does me know harm to come to these convictions. 
 
&quot;You are speaking like a hard-core segregationist who just can&#039;t imagine mixed marriage.&quot; 
 
 
So housing rights are now bundled with marriage certificates and this is my sly way to get rid of the gays in the hetero neighborhood. You argue like an insane person. 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Millions of people believe that monogamy is better than promiscuity, for a large number of reasons.&quot; </p>
<p>A large number of purely subjective reasons. And we&#039;re not talking about personal choice but whether the state needs to regulate and promote a new kind of &quot;marriage&quot; based on special kinds of &quot;equality.&quot; </p>
<p>&quot;Ask Rob Portman, or all of the Republicans who support SSM for the exact reason that it IS a conservative ideal.&quot; </p>
<p>Sure. Conserve hypocrisy. OK. Whatever. </p>
<p>&quot;You are raising a sarcastic straw man argument.&quot; </p>
<p>Not. </p>
<p>&quot;There are people just as conservative as you, you believe that monogamy is such a strong ideal that gay couples shouldn&#039;t be precluded from it. &quot; </p>
<p>Totally false. How am I excluding anyone from being monogamous? You&#039;re absurd. You don&#039;t even make sense. If you&#039;d read your own claims with an open mind you&#039;d see your arguments are circular and dependent on positions you took entirely for emotional reasons. You were indoctrinated before you ever had a chance to think about anything we&#039;re discussing. </p>
<p>News flash, I once thought gay marriage was harmless until I waded through the nonsense and considered the real consequences. I&#039;m not a politician so it does me know harm to come to these convictions. </p>
<p>&quot;You are speaking like a hard-core segregationist who just can&#039;t imagine mixed marriage.&quot; </p>
<p>So housing rights are now bundled with marriage certificates and this is my sly way to get rid of the gays in the hetero neighborhood. You argue like an insane person. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4441405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 21:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4441405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gay marriage will have zero impact on the ability or likelihood of gay people to have sex.  Marriage equality is not about having sex.  You seem a bit hung up on that, if you don&#039;t mind me pointing that out.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gay marriage will have zero impact on the ability or likelihood of gay people to have sex.  Marriage equality is not about having sex.  You seem a bit hung up on that, if you don&#039;t mind me pointing that out.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4441399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 21:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4441399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aren&#039;t you clever lil&#039; bigot, Mary Sue. 
 
Back to your knitting, dear.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#039;t you clever lil&#039; bigot, Mary Sue. </p>
<p>Back to your knitting, dear.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4441398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 21:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4441398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YOU don&#039;t have the right to marry a woman?! 
 
Dude, you&#039;re embarrassing yourself.  Stop.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU don&#039;t have the right to marry a woman?! </p>
<p>Dude, you&#039;re embarrassing yourself.  Stop.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4441395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 21:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4441395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;And they do it too; look at all the gay people that marry straight!&quot; 
 
Yeah!  Just keep the gays in the closet, becuse they scare Mary Sue, like most everything that is not in her tiny little comfort zone!   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;And they do it too; look at all the gay people that marry straight!&quot; </p>
<p>Yeah!  Just keep the gays in the closet, becuse they scare Mary Sue, like most everything that is not in her tiny little comfort zone!   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-gay-marriage-actually-different-than-polygamy/comment-page-1/#comment-4441388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 21:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183472#comment-4441388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who says so, Mary Sue?  Do you know gay people and have you discussed this with them?   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who says so, Mary Sue?  Do you know gay people and have you discussed this with them?   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 814/917 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 14:23:58 by W3 Total Cache -->