<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is It Time for the GOP to Embrace Gay Marriage?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4462153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4462153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The horror of male masturbation! Geez, get a life! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The horror of male masturbation! Geez, get a life! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4462151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4462151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God didn&#039;t do anything about the polygamist marriages in the old Testament though. Interesting. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God didn&#039;t do anything about the polygamist marriages in the old Testament though. Interesting. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4462132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4462132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A  church is not required to hold same sex marriages in its churches. However, if they own a hall that is generally open to the public, they may be required to rent to all comers under anti-discrimination laws. This would include being unable to discriminate against Jewish Weddings or Mixed Race Weddings, even if those went against their religious beliefs. This is really a seperate issue from same sex marriage. We don&#039;t allow people who are white seperatists to run a hotel and exclude blacks, even if it is their sincerely held religious belief that the races shouldn&#039;t mix. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A  church is not required to hold same sex marriages in its churches. However, if they own a hall that is generally open to the public, they may be required to rent to all comers under anti-discrimination laws. This would include being unable to discriminate against Jewish Weddings or Mixed Race Weddings, even if those went against their religious beliefs. This is really a seperate issue from same sex marriage. We don&#039;t allow people who are white seperatists to run a hotel and exclude blacks, even if it is their sincerely held religious belief that the races shouldn&#039;t mix. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheOne</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4313449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheOne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4313449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah Hugh&#039;s making up numbers again.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Hugh&#039;s making up numbers again.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeloak</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4310998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeloak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 03:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4310998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem for you is that as long as us &quot;reactionaries&quot; are able to maintain the freedom you have, you can say, think, and feel as you please.  The same isn&#039;t true when your side finally takes over and the &quot;fundamental transformation&quot; of America is completed. 
 
 Look to Stalin&#039;s Soviet Union, Mao&#039;s China, or Castro&#039;s Cuba for examples of what happens to people who say incorrect things, think incorrect thoughts, or have incorrect feelings. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem for you is that as long as us &quot;reactionaries&quot; are able to maintain the freedom you have, you can say, think, and feel as you please.  The same isn&#039;t true when your side finally takes over and the &quot;fundamental transformation&quot; of America is completed. </p>
<p> Look to Stalin&#039;s Soviet Union, Mao&#039;s China, or Castro&#039;s Cuba for examples of what happens to people who say incorrect things, think incorrect thoughts, or have incorrect feelings. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4310525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4310525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bull sh**.  You&#039;re lying through your teeth.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bull sh**.  You&#039;re lying through your teeth.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4310522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4310522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hugh, I doubt one iota that you would be for legally forbidding elderly couples unable and unwilling to procreate, or for that matter young couples, from marrying because they could not procreate.   
 
You are absolutely, positively wrong about this:  &quot;The Catholic Church teaches that a man and a woman who want to get married, but who intend never to have children, cannot validly contract a marriage. The Church will not marry them.&quot; 
 
Time to return to catechism class.    ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hugh, I doubt one iota that you would be for legally forbidding elderly couples unable and unwilling to procreate, or for that matter young couples, from marrying because they could not procreate.   </p>
<p>You are absolutely, positively wrong about this:  &quot;The Catholic Church teaches that a man and a woman who want to get married, but who intend never to have children, cannot validly contract a marriage. The Church will not marry them.&quot; </p>
<p>Time to return to catechism class.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4310517</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4310517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;So you are taking the position that polygamy is clearly bad for society while homosexual &quot;equality in marriage&quot; (making gender moot) is not?&quot; 
 
Yes.    
 
&quot;...so I want to hear that argument that doesn&#039;t apply to homosexual pairs.&quot; 
 
Because if someone &quot;marries&quot; a pet horse, it is a meaningless appelation.  How do we extend any kind of spousal rights to that pet horse?  How does property get shared, etc.?  Same goes with polygamy.  It makes a mess of law. Same goes with people marrying relatives.  It hurts society and the law.  Gay marriage does not do that.   
 
&quot;Then you have to make the case that polygamists somehow have fewer &quot;individual rights&quot; to marry the &quot;person they love.&quot;&quot; 
 
I just did.  I accept that marriage is a social institution which affects society, and so society should have a say in who marries. I just can&#039;t come up with an argument that says that two committed serious adults, who are not related (more legal/social confusion), some how hurt society or the institution of marriage.  In fact, I see that it strengthens it like any good marriage would. 
 
I&#039;ve noticed that you&#039;ve offered zero arguments against gay marriage on your own.  It&#039;s because you have none.  I&#039;d love to hear your reasoning.  Hint:  &quot;Gays are so...icky!&quot; doesn&#039;t cut it.  Surely you and Mrs. OFM are &quot;icky&quot; too, but that shouldn&#039;t keep you from marrying.   
 
See how democracy works?   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;So you are taking the position that polygamy is clearly bad for society while homosexual &quot;equality in marriage&quot; (making gender moot) is not?&quot; </p>
<p>Yes.    </p>
<p>&quot;&#8230;so I want to hear that argument that doesn&#039;t apply to homosexual pairs.&quot; </p>
<p>Because if someone &quot;marries&quot; a pet horse, it is a meaningless appelation.  How do we extend any kind of spousal rights to that pet horse?  How does property get shared, etc.?  Same goes with polygamy.  It makes a mess of law. Same goes with people marrying relatives.  It hurts society and the law.  Gay marriage does not do that.   </p>
<p>&quot;Then you have to make the case that polygamists somehow have fewer &quot;individual rights&quot; to marry the &quot;person they love.&quot;&quot; </p>
<p>I just did.  I accept that marriage is a social institution which affects society, and so society should have a say in who marries. I just can&#039;t come up with an argument that says that two committed serious adults, who are not related (more legal/social confusion), some how hurt society or the institution of marriage.  In fact, I see that it strengthens it like any good marriage would. </p>
<p>I&#039;ve noticed that you&#039;ve offered zero arguments against gay marriage on your own.  It&#039;s because you have none.  I&#039;d love to hear your reasoning.  Hint:  &quot;Gays are so&#8230;icky!&quot; doesn&#039;t cut it.  Surely you and Mrs. OFM are &quot;icky&quot; too, but that shouldn&#039;t keep you from marrying.   </p>
<p>See how democracy works?   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4310502</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 00:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4310502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re allowed to &quot;feel&quot; anyway you wish, and state very vocally how you feel.  You just can&#039;t discriminate against fellow American citizens for totally pointless reasons.   
 
As an example, I can feel that you&#039;re a reactionary posing as a thoughtful conservative, and say it, but I can&#039;t keep you from voting or polluting chat boards with your stupidity.   
 
See how democracy works?   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#039;re allowed to &quot;feel&quot; anyway you wish, and state very vocally how you feel.  You just can&#039;t discriminate against fellow American citizens for totally pointless reasons.   </p>
<p>As an example, I can feel that you&#039;re a reactionary posing as a thoughtful conservative, and say it, but I can&#039;t keep you from voting or polluting chat boards with your stupidity.   </p>
<p>See how democracy works?   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExtremeNativist</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4303540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ExtremeNativist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 23:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4303540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During a time in which we are assaulted by a gale of Leftist lies we should take moment to remember the fact that there is no such thing as gay marriage. 
 
Marriage is the union of a man and a woman in the sight of God. Without God there is no marriage, and without a man and a woman there is no marriage. 
 
Fashionable fads and government lies do not change that fact. If gays want to commit to each other (and typically several hundred other sexual partners) and live together, that&#039;s certainly none of my business. But they aren&#039;t married. 
 
The lie of gay marriage is just another perverse, dishonest attempt by the Left to redefine reality and destroy civilization. It is just another attempt to normalize deviance; deviants being one of the prime constituencies of the Leftist traitors and tyrants. 
 
Gay simply marriage doesn&#039;t exist. It is just another Leftist fantasy. 
 
And the cowards over at &quot;The American Conservative&quot; have decided to join the enemy. Their redefining of conservatism so that it is indistinguishable from lively, vibrant, diverse, Leftist pathology is deadly serious, but it reads just like the Onion. Their tortuous rationalizations of their cowardly surrender savor of the same kinds of insane rationalizations that have been oozing out of Leftists for decades. These are people who waste ALL of the intelligence they have trying to make us believe that right is wrong, cowardice is courage and success is failure. They are literally insane. 
 
In the past month &quot;The American Conservative&quot; ran a story &quot;celebrating&quot; the hostile invasion and infestation of the U.S. by third-world savages and affirmative-action parasites because they might just some day vote antiwar. Good lord. I thought for sure this was just clumsy sarcasm, but no, they actually think our little brown and black brothers will save us from ourselves. 
 
Another imbecile over a AmCon, a Leon Hadar, actually seems to think that our affirmative-action-parasite-in-chief is a &quot;Republican Realist.&quot; That is just a flat out fantasy. Hadar has made a cowardly surrender to Leftist tyranny, but he doesn&#039;t have the honesty to admit it. He would have us believe he is still some kind of conservative. &quot;The American Conservative&quot; is becoming the jailhouse bitch of evil Leftists and they are doing this in full public view. 
The American Conservative has made the Onion redundant. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During a time in which we are assaulted by a gale of Leftist lies we should take moment to remember the fact that there is no such thing as gay marriage. </p>
<p>Marriage is the union of a man and a woman in the sight of God. Without God there is no marriage, and without a man and a woman there is no marriage. </p>
<p>Fashionable fads and government lies do not change that fact. If gays want to commit to each other (and typically several hundred other sexual partners) and live together, that&#039;s certainly none of my business. But they aren&#039;t married. </p>
<p>The lie of gay marriage is just another perverse, dishonest attempt by the Left to redefine reality and destroy civilization. It is just another attempt to normalize deviance; deviants being one of the prime constituencies of the Leftist traitors and tyrants. </p>
<p>Gay simply marriage doesn&#039;t exist. It is just another Leftist fantasy. </p>
<p>And the cowards over at &quot;The American Conservative&quot; have decided to join the enemy. Their redefining of conservatism so that it is indistinguishable from lively, vibrant, diverse, Leftist pathology is deadly serious, but it reads just like the Onion. Their tortuous rationalizations of their cowardly surrender savor of the same kinds of insane rationalizations that have been oozing out of Leftists for decades. These are people who waste ALL of the intelligence they have trying to make us believe that right is wrong, cowardice is courage and success is failure. They are literally insane. </p>
<p>In the past month &quot;The American Conservative&quot; ran a story &quot;celebrating&quot; the hostile invasion and infestation of the U.S. by third-world savages and affirmative-action parasites because they might just some day vote antiwar. Good lord. I thought for sure this was just clumsy sarcasm, but no, they actually think our little brown and black brothers will save us from ourselves. </p>
<p>Another imbecile over a AmCon, a Leon Hadar, actually seems to think that our affirmative-action-parasite-in-chief is a &quot;Republican Realist.&quot; That is just a flat out fantasy. Hadar has made a cowardly surrender to Leftist tyranny, but he doesn&#039;t have the honesty to admit it. He would have us believe he is still some kind of conservative. &quot;The American Conservative&quot; is becoming the jailhouse bitch of evil Leftists and they are doing this in full public view.<br />
The American Conservative has made the Onion redundant. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Embriaco</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4302849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugh Embriaco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4302849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where homosexuals are able to &quot;marry,&quot; their average &quot;marriage&quot; lasts 1.5 years.  While they are in this &quot;marriage,&quot; they have an average of 12 outside partners. 
 
If a heterosexual couple were going to behave the same way (get married for 1.5 years and have affairs with 12 different people), they would have the sense not to get married. 
 
So this is not about marriage.  This is a sham about manipulating the system for government benefits, like the people who get married to get a green card or to get on their &quot;spouse&#039;s&quot; health insurance. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where homosexuals are able to &quot;marry,&quot; their average &quot;marriage&quot; lasts 1.5 years.  While they are in this &quot;marriage,&quot; they have an average of 12 outside partners. </p>
<p>If a heterosexual couple were going to behave the same way (get married for 1.5 years and have affairs with 12 different people), they would have the sense not to get married. </p>
<p>So this is not about marriage.  This is a sham about manipulating the system for government benefits, like the people who get married to get a green card or to get on their &quot;spouse&#039;s&quot; health insurance. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4301645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4301645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;&quot;Polygamy,&quot; marrying dogs and cats, etc., and any other specious comparisons Danny tries to make are moot, because such unions demonstrably damage society,&quot; 
 
 
So you are taking the position that polygamy is clearly bad for society while homosexual &quot;equality in marriage&quot; (making gender moot) is not? 
 
Please try to make that case. I can&#039;t want. You said, &quot;such unions demonstrably damage society&quot; in reference to marriage with animals or multiple spouses (including multiple animals I suppose) so I want to hear that argument that doesn&#039;t apply to homosexual pairs. 
 
Then you have to make the case that polygamists somehow have fewer &quot;individual rights&quot; to marry the &quot;person they love.&quot; 
 
&quot;Danny Greenfield provides no reason why such unions would threaten families or other exising marriages, and doesn&#039;t even pretend to offer them.&quot; 
 
Not all of us are as dense as you. Try this, as if you can read. 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/why_gay_marriage_is_not_a_right.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/why_gay_ma...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
 
&quot;He just is grossed out by gay people&quot; 
 
And you&#039;re an omniscient prophet. Didn&#039;t you on more than one occasion compare yourself to Jesus? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;&quot;Polygamy,&quot; marrying dogs and cats, etc., and any other specious comparisons Danny tries to make are moot, because such unions demonstrably damage society,&quot; </p>
<p>So you are taking the position that polygamy is clearly bad for society while homosexual &quot;equality in marriage&quot; (making gender moot) is not? </p>
<p>Please try to make that case. I can&#039;t want. You said, &quot;such unions demonstrably damage society&quot; in reference to marriage with animals or multiple spouses (including multiple animals I suppose) so I want to hear that argument that doesn&#039;t apply to homosexual pairs. </p>
<p>Then you have to make the case that polygamists somehow have fewer &quot;individual rights&quot; to marry the &quot;person they love.&quot; </p>
<p>&quot;Danny Greenfield provides no reason why such unions would threaten families or other exising marriages, and doesn&#039;t even pretend to offer them.&quot; </p>
<p>Not all of us are as dense as you. Try this, as if you can read.<br />
  <a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/why_gay_marriage_is_not_a_right.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/why_gay_ma" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/12/why_gay_ma</a>&#8230; </p>
<p>&quot;He just is grossed out by gay people&quot; </p>
<p>And you&#039;re an omniscient prophet. Didn&#039;t you on more than one occasion compare yourself to Jesus? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4301623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4301623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The true issue is will society be forced, not to just tolerate gay lifestyles, but to accept them as normal and not be allowed to think of them as deviant in any way. The true discrimination gays wish to end is the idea that their lifestyle is not normal. &quot; 
 
Bingo. Precisely. I lived near San Francisco for many years and watched the mentality evolve as they gained political power. Many of them &quot;feel&quot; that we are to adjust everything we say and do until they &quot;feel&quot; we accept them as totally equal in every way. The most radical will use it to go after every religion that makes any comment about the issue. It won&#039;t end well. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;The true issue is will society be forced, not to just tolerate gay lifestyles, but to accept them as normal and not be allowed to think of them as deviant in any way. The true discrimination gays wish to end is the idea that their lifestyle is not normal. &quot; </p>
<p>Bingo. Precisely. I lived near San Francisco for many years and watched the mentality evolve as they gained political power. Many of them &quot;feel&quot; that we are to adjust everything we say and do until they &quot;feel&quot; we accept them as totally equal in every way. The most radical will use it to go after every religion that makes any comment about the issue. It won&#039;t end well. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Embriaco</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4300456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugh Embriaco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 02:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4300456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Church also teaches that heterosexual fellatio or sodomy, when brought to fruition, is JUST AS EVIL and unnatural as homosexual fellatio or sodomy.  There is no difference in the nature of the sin.  In fact, masturbation is just as evil as homosexual sodomy. 
Who, these days, recognize these truths?  So the society is already so corrupt and irrational that it truly has no defense against arguments in favor of gay &quot;marriage.&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Church also teaches that heterosexual fellatio or sodomy, when brought to fruition, is JUST AS EVIL and unnatural as homosexual fellatio or sodomy.  There is no difference in the nature of the sin.  In fact, masturbation is just as evil as homosexual sodomy.<br />
Who, these days, recognize these truths?  So the society is already so corrupt and irrational that it truly has no defense against arguments in favor of gay &quot;marriage.&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Embriaco</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4300454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hugh Embriaco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 02:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4300454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason why a lot of people commenting here cannot see how gay &quot;marriage&quot; is an attack on marriage is that this is just the latest and most obvious attack on marriage that began with no-fault divorce. 
As long as people cannot understand that the principal end of marriage is the propagation of the species, and not merely a contract to receive government benefits as long as the mutual masturbation is satisfying, they cannot see that the definition of marriage is already destroyed. 
The Catholic Church teaches that a man and a woman who want to get married, but who intend never to have children, cannot validly contract a marriage.  The Church will not marry them.  But, on the other hand, the Church in America freely hands out annulments, and thus contributes to the corruption of marriage. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason why a lot of people commenting here cannot see how gay &quot;marriage&quot; is an attack on marriage is that this is just the latest and most obvious attack on marriage that began with no-fault divorce.<br />
As long as people cannot understand that the principal end of marriage is the propagation of the species, and not merely a contract to receive government benefits as long as the mutual masturbation is satisfying, they cannot see that the definition of marriage is already destroyed.<br />
The Catholic Church teaches that a man and a woman who want to get married, but who intend never to have children, cannot validly contract a marriage.  The Church will not marry them.  But, on the other hand, the Church in America freely hands out annulments, and thus contributes to the corruption of marriage. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4300188</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4300188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, nobody is saying you can&#039;t hate gays for being &quot;deviant,&quot; if you want.  Just give them fair protection under the law, okay?  &quot;I don&#039;t like them&quot; is not an argument for discrimination.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, nobody is saying you can&#039;t hate gays for being &quot;deviant,&quot; if you want.  Just give them fair protection under the law, okay?  &quot;I don&#039;t like them&quot; is not an argument for discrimination.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4300184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4300184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But Steel, why then do we hear story after story of gay people being unable to be with their spouse at the end of their lives in a hospital room or make medical decisions for them, or being able to inherit property from that person, and so on?  I refuse to believe these are all lies.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Steel, why then do we hear story after story of gay people being unable to be with their spouse at the end of their lives in a hospital room or make medical decisions for them, or being able to inherit property from that person, and so on?  I refuse to believe these are all lies.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4300178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4300178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world&#039;s turned upside down!  Aaargh! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world&#039;s turned upside down!  Aaargh! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4300175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4300175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good for Canada. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for Canada. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/is-it-time-for-the-gop-to-embrace-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4300169</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178702#comment-4300169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You must understand how far gay rights proponents have come.  They went from wanting the right to have anonymous sex in bath houses, to having the right to do the most conservative and society-affirming institution, marriage.  They are asking to settle down, commit fully to one another for life and build families and neighborhoods.   
 
I understand it&#039;s a jolt.  I went through a &quot;Good God, what next?!&quot; thing myself, but then realized that they want normalcy, not to be set aside and treated differently at all.   
 
And I am at a total loss to find a single salient argument as to why is threatens straight marriage.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must understand how far gay rights proponents have come.  They went from wanting the right to have anonymous sex in bath houses, to having the right to do the most conservative and society-affirming institution, marriage.  They are asking to settle down, commit fully to one another for life and build families and neighborhoods.   </p>
<p>I understand it&#039;s a jolt.  I went through a &quot;Good God, what next?!&quot; thing myself, but then realized that they want normalcy, not to be set aside and treated differently at all.   </p>
<p>And I am at a total loss to find a single salient argument as to why is threatens straight marriage.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 702/735 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 09:28:45 by W3 Total Cache -->