<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Johns Hopkins Denies Pro-Life Student Group, Allows Students for Justice in Palestine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: A Henneberry</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4445525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Henneberry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 01:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4445525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are 200 million girls aborted from the world&#039;s population; so sorry Hopkins students feel uncomfortable about supporters of life.  These geniuses need to watch abortions in progress and get real. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are 200 million girls aborted from the world&#039;s population; so sorry Hopkins students feel uncomfortable about supporters of life.  These geniuses need to watch abortions in progress and get real. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4445392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4445392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;So why the conservative fixation on sex when discussing gay marriage? Because by defining it down to a sexual transaction conservatives seek to remove the other profoundly enriching and constructive elements that most of us associate with the marital relationship from our consideration of gay marriage. It&#039;s a way to degrade the love between individuals of the same gender, and to remove their relationships from the space conservatives would prefer to reserve for relationships between those of different genders.&quot; 
 
&quot;Love&quot; does not require the coerced participation of others. Why do you need the government to expand marriage laws then? 
 
&quot;And then, having stripped gay marriage of everything but the sex&quot; 
 
No. Marriage is about commitment. It was originally a church commitment so that society would assist coercing the couples to stay together. So why do gays need marriage? 
 
&quot;conservatives go a step further, lumping it in with the kinds of behaviors engaged in by the criminal and the insane.&quot; 
 
It&#039;s &quot;lumped&quot; with other desires that fall outside the realm of sex that the government has an interest in; the kind of sex that produces children. 
 
Now can you see the distinction? Children, vs. no plausible healthy way to produce or raise children. That&#039;s the defining distinction. 
 
This has been explained before and leftists will still ignore the salient points and talk to each other about how conservatives don&#039;t make sense on the basis of their own lack of comprehension. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;So why the conservative fixation on sex when discussing gay marriage? Because by defining it down to a sexual transaction conservatives seek to remove the other profoundly enriching and constructive elements that most of us associate with the marital relationship from our consideration of gay marriage. It&#039;s a way to degrade the love between individuals of the same gender, and to remove their relationships from the space conservatives would prefer to reserve for relationships between those of different genders.&quot; </p>
<p>&quot;Love&quot; does not require the coerced participation of others. Why do you need the government to expand marriage laws then? </p>
<p>&quot;And then, having stripped gay marriage of everything but the sex&quot; </p>
<p>No. Marriage is about commitment. It was originally a church commitment so that society would assist coercing the couples to stay together. So why do gays need marriage? </p>
<p>&quot;conservatives go a step further, lumping it in with the kinds of behaviors engaged in by the criminal and the insane.&quot; </p>
<p>It&#039;s &quot;lumped&quot; with other desires that fall outside the realm of sex that the government has an interest in; the kind of sex that produces children. </p>
<p>Now can you see the distinction? Children, vs. no plausible healthy way to produce or raise children. That&#039;s the defining distinction. </p>
<p>This has been explained before and leftists will still ignore the salient points and talk to each other about how conservatives don&#039;t make sense on the basis of their own lack of comprehension. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4445381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 00:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4445381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;First, a note about analogies. When you make an analogy it means that you see similarities in the things being compared sufficient to make discussion of one relevant to understanding the other.&quot; 
 
True. 
 
&quot;So what are the similarities you must see between bestiality, for example, and gay marriage to make discussion of the former relevant to the latter?&quot; 
 
That neither represents relationships that the state should have any interest in promoting. 
 
&quot;For conservatives, apparently, it&#039;s the presence of a sexual transaction or, perhaps more to the point, some sense that the defining element of both activities is sexual.&quot; 
 
They&#039;re not both sexual? They&#039;re justified with similar explanations about desire and satisfaction. They are both unhealthy for children who are exposed. Need I go on? 
 
&quot;So why the conservative fixation on sex when discussing gay marriage?&quot; 
 
That&#039;s an absurd question. It&#039;s not about sex? Really? It&#039;s about &quot;sexual orientation&quot; and sexual desire, and lack of desire for people of the opposite sex but it&#039;s not really about sex? Why call it marriage because marriage is certainly about sex. 
 
Leftists can say anything to each other and get agreement about how smart they are. It&#039;s amazing. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;First, a note about analogies. When you make an analogy it means that you see similarities in the things being compared sufficient to make discussion of one relevant to understanding the other.&quot; </p>
<p>True. </p>
<p>&quot;So what are the similarities you must see between bestiality, for example, and gay marriage to make discussion of the former relevant to the latter?&quot; </p>
<p>That neither represents relationships that the state should have any interest in promoting. </p>
<p>&quot;For conservatives, apparently, it&#039;s the presence of a sexual transaction or, perhaps more to the point, some sense that the defining element of both activities is sexual.&quot; </p>
<p>They&#039;re not both sexual? They&#039;re justified with similar explanations about desire and satisfaction. They are both unhealthy for children who are exposed. Need I go on? </p>
<p>&quot;So why the conservative fixation on sex when discussing gay marriage?&quot; </p>
<p>That&#039;s an absurd question. It&#039;s not about sex? Really? It&#039;s about &quot;sexual orientation&quot; and sexual desire, and lack of desire for people of the opposite sex but it&#039;s not really about sex? Why call it marriage because marriage is certainly about sex. </p>
<p>Leftists can say anything to each other and get agreement about how smart they are. It&#039;s amazing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Doe</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4444737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jane Doe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 20:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4444737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fiur members of my immediate family graduated from JHU. And we have been generous donors for many years, wrongly believing that JHU is not one of the many far left leaning prestigious universities. They have henceforth lost a major donor. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fiur members of my immediate family graduated from JHU. And we have been generous donors for many years, wrongly believing that JHU is not one of the many far left leaning prestigious universities. They have henceforth lost a major donor. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wannabe</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4444348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wannabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4444348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This op-ed sums it up quite nicely, imho:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/anson-kaye/2013/04/04/conservatives-rush-to-defend-ben-carsons-gay-marriage-remarks&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/anson-kaye/20...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
&quot;First, a note about analogies. When you make an analogy it means that you see similarities in the things being compared sufficient to make discussion of one relevant to understanding the other. So what are the similarities you must see between bestiality, for example, and gay marriage to make discussion of the former relevant to the latter? For conservatives, apparently, it&#039;s the presence of a sexual transaction or, perhaps more to the point, some sense that the defining element of both activities is sexual. 
 
So why the conservative fixation on sex when discussing gay marriage? Because by defining it down to a sexual transaction conservatives seek to remove the other profoundly enriching and constructive elements that most of us associate with the marital relationship from our consideration of gay marriage. It&#039;s a way to degrade the love between individuals of the same gender, and to remove their relationships from the space conservatives would prefer to reserve for relationships between those of different genders. 
 
And then, having stripped gay marriage of everything but the sex, conservatives go a step further, lumping it in with the kinds of behaviors engaged in by the criminal and the insane.&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This op-ed sums it up quite nicely, imho:  <a href="http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/anson-kaye/2013/04/04/conservatives-rush-to-defend-ben-carsons-gay-marriage-remarks" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/anson-kaye/20" rel="nofollow">http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/anson-kaye/20</a>&#8230; </p>
<p>&quot;First, a note about analogies. When you make an analogy it means that you see similarities in the things being compared sufficient to make discussion of one relevant to understanding the other. So what are the similarities you must see between bestiality, for example, and gay marriage to make discussion of the former relevant to the latter? For conservatives, apparently, it&#039;s the presence of a sexual transaction or, perhaps more to the point, some sense that the defining element of both activities is sexual. </p>
<p>So why the conservative fixation on sex when discussing gay marriage? Because by defining it down to a sexual transaction conservatives seek to remove the other profoundly enriching and constructive elements that most of us associate with the marital relationship from our consideration of gay marriage. It&#039;s a way to degrade the love between individuals of the same gender, and to remove their relationships from the space conservatives would prefer to reserve for relationships between those of different genders. </p>
<p>And then, having stripped gay marriage of everything but the sex, conservatives go a step further, lumping it in with the kinds of behaviors engaged in by the criminal and the insane.&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4442366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 04:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4442366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;linking homosexuality to pedophilia&quot; 
 
Homosexual sex and pedophilia are both illegitimate ways to construct a marriage in our civilization. Not only that but some pedophiles (from a legal perspective) have a stronger argument for lowering the age of consent whereas homosexual marriage has no logical arguments in favor. Pedophiles can produce children. Homosexuals can&#039;t. 
 
I like the laws as they exist. I&#039;m OK with having children wait. I&#039;m OK with gays doing what they want. It&#039;s absurd to think of &quot;marriage&quot; as a &quot;right&quot; to be defined according to BS theories. 
 
It&#039;s easier and more logical to say that to achieve perfect equality, the state should not sanction any marriages at all. But it has an interest in stable lives for children. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;linking homosexuality to pedophilia&quot; </p>
<p>Homosexual sex and pedophilia are both illegitimate ways to construct a marriage in our civilization. Not only that but some pedophiles (from a legal perspective) have a stronger argument for lowering the age of consent whereas homosexual marriage has no logical arguments in favor. Pedophiles can produce children. Homosexuals can&#039;t. </p>
<p>I like the laws as they exist. I&#039;m OK with having children wait. I&#039;m OK with gays doing what they want. It&#039;s absurd to think of &quot;marriage&quot; as a &quot;right&quot; to be defined according to BS theories. </p>
<p>It&#039;s easier and more logical to say that to achieve perfect equality, the state should not sanction any marriages at all. But it has an interest in stable lives for children. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wannabe</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4442160</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wannabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 02:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4442160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going to ask you the same question originally--you referred to &#039;unpopular truths&#039; in your initial response, which could be (and was) read as sarcastically insinuating his association (linking homosexuality to pedophilia, etc.), was truth, albeit unpopular.  
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to ask you the same question originally&#8211;you referred to &#039;unpopular truths&#039; in your initial response, which could be (and was) read as sarcastically insinuating his association (linking homosexuality to pedophilia, etc.), was truth, albeit unpopular.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4442067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 02:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4442067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;However, what we was indirectly referring to regarding homosexuality is by no means truth.&quot; 
 
 
Please elaborate and include distinctions between subjective opinions and &quot;truth.&quot; Maybe I missed something. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;However, what we was indirectly referring to regarding homosexuality is by no means truth.&quot; </p>
<p>Please elaborate and include distinctions between subjective opinions and &quot;truth.&quot; Maybe I missed something. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wannabe</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4442029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wannabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 01:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4442029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[However, what we was indirectly referring to regarding homosexuality is by no means truth.  
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However, what we was indirectly referring to regarding homosexuality is by no means truth.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4441959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 01:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4441959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It&#039;s Johns, with an s.&quot; 
 
 
J-Hop. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;It&#039;s Johns, with an s.&quot; </p>
<p>J-Hop. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4441957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 01:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4441957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Regardless of your own individual viewpoint or stance on this matter, there&#039;s a level of professional conduct that is expected of someone of his stature, and, many found this comment completely out of line and rather offensive. &quot; 
 
It is unprofessional to speak unpopular truths. No doubt about it. We want pure sellouts now that the left has established dominant cultural hegemony in the West. Political correctness rules. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Regardless of your own individual viewpoint or stance on this matter, there&#039;s a level of professional conduct that is expected of someone of his stature, and, many found this comment completely out of line and rather offensive. &quot; </p>
<p>It is unprofessional to speak unpopular truths. No doubt about it. We want pure sellouts now that the left has established dominant cultural hegemony in the West. Political correctness rules. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wannabe</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4441868</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wannabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 00:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4441868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Students at the School of Medicine objected to Dr. Carson speaking at the Commencement due to a separate matter, specifically, his comment equating same-sex marriages with bestiality and pedophilia, to quote:  
 
CARSON: &quot;Well, my thoughts are that marriage is between a man and a woman. It&#039;s a well-established, fundamental pillar of society and no group, be they gays, be they NAMBLA, be they people who believe in bestiality. It doesn&#039;t matter what they are.&quot;  
 
Regardless of your own individual viewpoint or stance on this matter, there&#039;s a level of professional conduct that is expected of someone of his stature, and, many found this comment completely out of line and rather offensive.  
 
And, of course, to add, he&#039;s allowed to exercise his right to free speech, and make these indirect connections on public television as he wishes. However, Hopkins students are also allowed to exercise their right to protest his offensive comment, and, subsequently request he withdraw as a Commencement speaker.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Students at the School of Medicine objected to Dr. Carson speaking at the Commencement due to a separate matter, specifically, his comment equating same-sex marriages with bestiality and pedophilia, to quote:  </p>
<p>CARSON: &quot;Well, my thoughts are that marriage is between a man and a woman. It&#039;s a well-established, fundamental pillar of society and no group, be they gays, be they NAMBLA, be they people who believe in bestiality. It doesn&#039;t matter what they are.&quot;  </p>
<p>Regardless of your own individual viewpoint or stance on this matter, there&#039;s a level of professional conduct that is expected of someone of his stature, and, many found this comment completely out of line and rather offensive.  </p>
<p>And, of course, to add, he&#039;s allowed to exercise his right to free speech, and make these indirect connections on public television as he wishes. However, Hopkins students are also allowed to exercise their right to protest his offensive comment, and, subsequently request he withdraw as a Commencement speaker.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ______</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4441529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[______]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4441529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is my own opinion and I do not speak on behalf of the school in any shape or form. As a student at Johns Hopkins, it is easy to understand the SGA&#039;s response. While I am not sure whether it is Voice For Life (though one source has said that it is that group), in the past, a pro-life group has posted horrendous billboards of babies&#039; limbs on the street that I have to walk across to get to class everyday (not just outside of the abortion clinic). While I do not necessarily support abortion, the manner of their consultation is very obtrusive and does make our learning environment feel unsafe as older men (I have yet to come across a woman from this organization who has taken part in these ad campaigns) attempt to tell female students what to do with their bodies. Thus, from recent memory, the feeling of harassment may be fresh in the minds of the students. Rather than being so confrontational and closing minds, that organization, and Voice for Life should instead try to create a better environment for learning. If they want to provide consultation, instead of sidewalk consultations, the best form of informing people is to have voluntary seminars on what it means to have an abortion and advertise those classes. This will be more effective in comparison to creating mental distress that can close minds before they have had the time to consider the consequences of abortion. Please take this into account prior to making judgements. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my own opinion and I do not speak on behalf of the school in any shape or form. As a student at Johns Hopkins, it is easy to understand the SGA&#039;s response. While I am not sure whether it is Voice For Life (though one source has said that it is that group), in the past, a pro-life group has posted horrendous billboards of babies&#039; limbs on the street that I have to walk across to get to class everyday (not just outside of the abortion clinic). While I do not necessarily support abortion, the manner of their consultation is very obtrusive and does make our learning environment feel unsafe as older men (I have yet to come across a woman from this organization who has taken part in these ad campaigns) attempt to tell female students what to do with their bodies. Thus, from recent memory, the feeling of harassment may be fresh in the minds of the students. Rather than being so confrontational and closing minds, that organization, and Voice for Life should instead try to create a better environment for learning. If they want to provide consultation, instead of sidewalk consultations, the best form of informing people is to have voluntary seminars on what it means to have an abortion and advertise those classes. This will be more effective in comparison to creating mental distress that can close minds before they have had the time to consider the consequences of abortion. Please take this into account prior to making judgements. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kasandra</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4441113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kasandra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 19:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4441113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And this is the school where students are objecting to Ben Carson giving a commencement speech.  The world certainly has turned upside down. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this is the school where students are objecting to Ben Carson giving a commencement speech.  The world certainly has turned upside down. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ar&#039;nun</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4440183</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ar&#039;nun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4440183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Johns Hopkins Denies Pro-Life Student Group, Allows Students for Justice in Palestine&quot; 
Ok, Johns Hopkins will be checked off as Pro Genocide.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Johns Hopkins Denies Pro-Life Student Group, Allows Students for Justice in Palestine&quot;<br />
Ok, Johns Hopkins will be checked off as Pro Genocide.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ar&#039;nun</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4440170</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ar&#039;nun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4440170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great link, bookmarked. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great link, bookmarked. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wannabe</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4439557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wannabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4439557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s Johns, with an s. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s Johns, with an s. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michae1803</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4439324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michae1803]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 06:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4439324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It;s not like the students at Johns Hopkins display any sort of discernment or logic.  They are lemmings following the other lemmings over the cliff.  And to think that my brother donated $100,000 to that school.  He&#039;s spinning in his grave. They&#039;re as vapid as all Ivy League wannabe&#039;s. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It;s not like the students at Johns Hopkins display any sort of discernment or logic.  They are lemmings following the other lemmings over the cliff.  And to think that my brother donated $100,000 to that school.  He&#039;s spinning in his grave. They&#039;re as vapid as all Ivy League wannabe&#039;s. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wakefield Tolbert</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4439094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wakefield Tolbert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 05:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4439094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AdkinK is correct.   
  
The ISM has PLAINLY and OPENLY admitted that their goal is not ultimately some &quot;human rights&quot; based initiative (unless &quot;human rights&quot; is to be equated with the will of the Prophet, perhaps), but rather the destruction of Israel. All of it.  No, not just Gaza or the &quot;West Bank&quot;.   
  
And like the Pallies themselves,  if you grill the ISM for more than 3 minutes, they&#039;d get around to admitting this even if stateside the Obamanauts can&#039;t bring themselves to admit what the &quot;Pally&quot; cause is all about, or the crackpottery of the &quot;Palestinian perspective&quot; on things being something other than sheer hatred.   
  
As with the Pallies, if we shan&#039;t take them at their word, then whose word should we take?   
 Hillary Clinton&#039;s State Department?    
  
They plainly say that the whole point of BDS has less to do with some protest movement on principles regarding alleged &quot;war crimes&quot;,  such as stanching the flow of  Jihadist  weaponry via Gaza (as one example where Israel has to act at some point, as in the Jihadtilla/&quot;Flotilla&quot; episode a few years back) and more to do with isolation and de-legitimization of an entire nation in the eyes of the rest of the world; the thinking here being that so isolated, Israel would be abandoned with little trade, aging weaponry, and fall to Arab powers finally empathetic to the Pallie &quot;cause&quot;  (though in a   fit of perhaps poetic justice, most of the Arab nations hate the Palestinian Arabs. They use the &quot;Palestine&quot; issue as a way to cook up hatred for Israel and keep matters in the region on a rolling boil on the front political burner and away from their own daily internal horrors far more real than anything the IDF has ever done).  
  
For more fun and adventure and ammo about how to take a machete to the weedy thicket double-talk of local dingbat politicians who&#039;re into this kind of thing, as well as answering left wing street zombies who&#8217;re bunking over to spread the ISM bullseed stuff, see also:  
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://stoptheism.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://stoptheism.com/&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AdkinK is correct.   </p>
<p>The ISM has PLAINLY and OPENLY admitted that their goal is not ultimately some &quot;human rights&quot; based initiative (unless &quot;human rights&quot; is to be equated with the will of the Prophet, perhaps), but rather the destruction of Israel. All of it.  No, not just Gaza or the &quot;West Bank&quot;.   </p>
<p>And like the Pallies themselves,  if you grill the ISM for more than 3 minutes, they&#039;d get around to admitting this even if stateside the Obamanauts can&#039;t bring themselves to admit what the &quot;Pally&quot; cause is all about, or the crackpottery of the &quot;Palestinian perspective&quot; on things being something other than sheer hatred.   </p>
<p>As with the Pallies, if we shan&#039;t take them at their word, then whose word should we take?<br />
 Hillary Clinton&#039;s State Department?    </p>
<p>They plainly say that the whole point of BDS has less to do with some protest movement on principles regarding alleged &quot;war crimes&quot;,  such as stanching the flow of  Jihadist  weaponry via Gaza (as one example where Israel has to act at some point, as in the Jihadtilla/&quot;Flotilla&quot; episode a few years back) and more to do with isolation and de-legitimization of an entire nation in the eyes of the rest of the world; the thinking here being that so isolated, Israel would be abandoned with little trade, aging weaponry, and fall to Arab powers finally empathetic to the Pallie &quot;cause&quot;  (though in a   fit of perhaps poetic justice, most of the Arab nations hate the Palestinian Arabs. They use the &quot;Palestine&quot; issue as a way to cook up hatred for Israel and keep matters in the region on a rolling boil on the front political burner and away from their own daily internal horrors far more real than anything the IDF has ever done).  </p>
<p>For more fun and adventure and ammo about how to take a machete to the weedy thicket double-talk of local dingbat politicians who&#039;re into this kind of thing, as well as answering left wing street zombies who&rsquo;re bunking over to spread the ISM bullseed stuff, see also:<br />
  <a href="http://stoptheism.com/" rel="nofollow">http://stoptheism.com/</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/johns-hopkins-denies-pro-life-student-group-allows-students-for-justice-in-palestine/comment-page-1/#comment-4439063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Sue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 04:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=184105#comment-4439063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[it&#039;s the student societies that run the joints.  They&#039;re all populated by NDP/Liberal Democrat types who somehow made it official that the University of Whatever is &quot;officially&quot; of a &quot;Pro-Choice&quot; stance on abortion, therefore no dissenting opinion on abortion can be heard, because to be pro-life is to keep women barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen under a glass ceiling or some junk. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#039;s the student societies that run the joints.  They&#039;re all populated by NDP/Liberal Democrat types who somehow made it official that the University of Whatever is &quot;officially&quot; of a &quot;Pro-Choice&quot; stance on abortion, therefore no dissenting opinion on abortion can be heard, because to be pro-life is to keep women barefoot, pregnant, and in the kitchen under a glass ceiling or some junk. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 736/767 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 03:16:14 by W3 Total Cache -->