<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lincoln Unbound</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=lincoln-unbound</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 06:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: gray_man</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5238162</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gray_man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 07:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5238162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;As I had pointed out, slavery was one issue that lead up to the war, but not the only one.&quot; 
I didn&#039;t say slavery was the only issue. What I said was that without slavery, there wouldn&#039;t have been a war. Most of the issues revolved around slavery, or slavery had an impact. If Slavery was out of the picture, the rest could have been solved without all the bloodshed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As I had pointed out, slavery was one issue that lead up to the war, but not the only one.&#8221;<br />
I didn&#8217;t say slavery was the only issue. What I said was that without slavery, there wouldn&#8217;t have been a war. Most of the issues revolved around slavery, or slavery had an impact. If Slavery was out of the picture, the rest could have been solved without all the bloodshed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gray_man</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5238159</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gray_man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 06:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5238159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nonsense. I have not close my mind at all. Your comment: 
&#039;Moreover, what Dilorenzo has argued quite successfully has been maintained by other historians as well.&quot; In fact shows that you are the one with the closed mind. You assume that it was &quot;argued quite successfully&quot;. By who&#039;s standard? Yes, some historians may agree with some of Dilorenzo&#039;s arguments. However, what you refuse to accept is that equally qualified historians disagree with
some of his arguments. 
I&#039;m not the one confusing quantity with quality, however I also know, that just because someone dissents from the norm, does not make him correct either. No matter how much someone my agree, or in fact ,no matter how much his ideas, may seem to make sense.
In fact my entire argument is the same argument about &quot;man made&quot; global warning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nonsense. I have not close my mind at all. Your comment:<br />
&#8216;Moreover, what Dilorenzo has argued quite successfully has been maintained by other historians as well.&#8221; In fact shows that you are the one with the closed mind. You assume that it was &#8220;argued quite successfully&#8221;. By who&#8217;s standard? Yes, some historians may agree with some of Dilorenzo&#8217;s arguments. However, what you refuse to accept is that equally qualified historians disagree with<br />
some of his arguments.<br />
I&#8217;m not the one confusing quantity with quality, however I also know, that just because someone dissents from the norm, does not make him correct either. No matter how much someone my agree, or in fact ,no matter how much his ideas, may seem to make sense.<br />
In fact my entire argument is the same argument about &#8220;man made&#8221; global warning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluffcreek1967</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5238148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluffcreek1967]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5238148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The books I referred to are NOT socialist-progressive propaganda. You say this because it&#039;s convenient as a defense and because it doesn&#039;t require you to actually think through the issues in a more thoughtful manner. 


If you think I&#039;m a Leftist trying to push a progressive agenda, then you&#039;ve completely pegged me wrong. What you&#039;ve said is indicative of a knee-jerk reaction. 


Also, I&#039;m not &#039;picking&#039; on you. I was simply posting a comment in response to yours. This is what routinely happens on the internet where people exchange ideas and even debate them in a civil manner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The books I referred to are NOT socialist-progressive propaganda. You say this because it&#8217;s convenient as a defense and because it doesn&#8217;t require you to actually think through the issues in a more thoughtful manner. </p>
<p>If you think I&#8217;m a Leftist trying to push a progressive agenda, then you&#8217;ve completely pegged me wrong. What you&#8217;ve said is indicative of a knee-jerk reaction. </p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m not &#8216;picking&#8217; on you. I was simply posting a comment in response to yours. This is what routinely happens on the internet where people exchange ideas and even debate them in a civil manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluffcreek1967</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5238147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluffcreek1967]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5238147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand where you&#039;re coming from. However, I wouldn&#039;t allege that Thomas E. Woods, Jr. &#039;beats around the bush&#039; in any sense of the term. Incidentally, his treatment of the subject is quite brief. If you haven&#039;t done so, I would also urge you to check out such authors as James R. Kennedy, H.W. Crocker, and Lochlainn Seabrook who are much more thorough. You may not end up agreeing with them, but it&#039;s hard to ignore their historical and primary source arguments.  

As I had pointed out, slavery was one issue that lead up to the war, but not the only one. Fighting to end slavery emerged at a later point during the protracted war, but it was not the sole or even the primary cause of it. As Union General, Ulysses S. Grant, himself stated: &quot;If I thought this was was to abolish slavery, I would resign my commission and offer my sword to the other side.&quot; The facts support this time and time again. Thus, to ignore the other and more central reasons for the Civil War is myopic at best.  

As usual, however, the victors of any war get to write the history books - and Americans, for the most part, have only been given one side of the story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand where you&#8217;re coming from. However, I wouldn&#8217;t allege that Thomas E. Woods, Jr. &#8216;beats around the bush&#8217; in any sense of the term. Incidentally, his treatment of the subject is quite brief. If you haven&#8217;t done so, I would also urge you to check out such authors as James R. Kennedy, H.W. Crocker, and Lochlainn Seabrook who are much more thorough. You may not end up agreeing with them, but it&#8217;s hard to ignore their historical and primary source arguments.  </p>
<p>As I had pointed out, slavery was one issue that lead up to the war, but not the only one. Fighting to end slavery emerged at a later point during the protracted war, but it was not the sole or even the primary cause of it. As Union General, Ulysses S. Grant, himself stated: &#8220;If I thought this was was to abolish slavery, I would resign my commission and offer my sword to the other side.&#8221; The facts support this time and time again. Thus, to ignore the other and more central reasons for the Civil War is myopic at best.  </p>
<p>As usual, however, the victors of any war get to write the history books &#8211; and Americans, for the most part, have only been given one side of the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluffcreek1967</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5238141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluffcreek1967]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 05:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5238141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The quantity of books written on any subject doesn&#039;t make anything true or valid. Truth has never been settled by majority opinion either. It comes about as a result of the debate process, the exchange of ideas. But this requires that people hear what others have to say and fairly weigh them in the light of the evidence. Hint? 


Moreover, what Dilorenzo has argued quite successfully has been maintained by other historians as well. But you wouldn&#039;t know this because you&#039;ve closed your mind to differing opinions. In other words, don&#039;t confuse me with the facts, my mind&#039;s already made up!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quantity of books written on any subject doesn&#8217;t make anything true or valid. Truth has never been settled by majority opinion either. It comes about as a result of the debate process, the exchange of ideas. But this requires that people hear what others have to say and fairly weigh them in the light of the evidence. Hint? </p>
<p>Moreover, what Dilorenzo has argued quite successfully has been maintained by other historians as well. But you wouldn&#8217;t know this because you&#8217;ve closed your mind to differing opinions. In other words, don&#8217;t confuse me with the facts, my mind&#8217;s already made up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DebRollin</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5238083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DebRollin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5238083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks but no thanks, I am not the least bit interested in Socialist Progressive propaganda. Pick on someone else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks but no thanks, I am not the least bit interested in Socialist Progressive propaganda. Pick on someone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gray_man</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5238061</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gray_man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5238061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To give your argument back. Nonsense! 
More books about Lincoln have been written then any other President.
To assume Dilorenzo&#039;s work is the only truth is again, Nonsense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To give your argument back. Nonsense!<br />
More books about Lincoln have been written then any other President.<br />
To assume Dilorenzo&#8217;s work is the only truth is again, Nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gray_man</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5238060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gray_man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5238060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve read the book a long time ago, and the one on the Civil War. Good reads. However, they both beat around the bush. The bottom line is that if slavery had not been a practice in the United States the Civil war would not have happened. You can talk about the economics of the south / north. You can talk about trade with other countries of the north / south. You can talk about voting and the 3/5th&#039;s rule. You can talk about secession of the south. You can talk about what a &quot;tyrant&quot; Lincoln was. The central issue of all that revolves around slavery. Ergo: no slavery no war.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read the book a long time ago, and the one on the Civil War. Good reads. However, they both beat around the bush. The bottom line is that if slavery had not been a practice in the United States the Civil war would not have happened. You can talk about the economics of the south / north. You can talk about trade with other countries of the north / south. You can talk about voting and the 3/5th&#8217;s rule. You can talk about secession of the south. You can talk about what a &#8220;tyrant&#8221; Lincoln was. The central issue of all that revolves around slavery. Ergo: no slavery no war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluffcreek1967</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5238054</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluffcreek1967]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5238054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking at things now, it would have been better had the South won and secession occurred. I won&#039;t defend the practice of slavery, but it would have eventually died of its own just as it did in all civilized Western nations. 


Yes, Lincoln preserved the Union. But because of things he implemented and set in motion, we&#039;re now stuck with this massive, bloated federal bureaucracy that always finds new ways to intrude within our lives. 


Ironically, what you&#039;ve said in your post about a revolution was very similar to how Southerners felt during the war between the states. The South, likewise, had felt the sting of tyranny that had come repeatedly from Washington, and they too wanted it &#039;nuked.&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at things now, it would have been better had the South won and secession occurred. I won&#8217;t defend the practice of slavery, but it would have eventually died of its own just as it did in all civilized Western nations. </p>
<p>Yes, Lincoln preserved the Union. But because of things he implemented and set in motion, we&#8217;re now stuck with this massive, bloated federal bureaucracy that always finds new ways to intrude within our lives. </p>
<p>Ironically, what you&#8217;ve said in your post about a revolution was very similar to how Southerners felt during the war between the states. The South, likewise, had felt the sting of tyranny that had come repeatedly from Washington, and they too wanted it &#8216;nuked.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluffcreek1967</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5238052</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluffcreek1967]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5238052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slavery was only one reason for the Civil War (and not even a major one as many historians admit). It mostly had to do with states&#039; rights issues and the increasing reach and power of the federal government. I won&#039;t attempt to justify slavery, but there were a host of concerns greater than that of slavery which led to the war between the states. I would get a hold of Thomas E. Woods&#039; book, &#039;The Politically Incorrect Gide to American History&#039; as a good start.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slavery was only one reason for the Civil War (and not even a major one as many historians admit). It mostly had to do with states&#8217; rights issues and the increasing reach and power of the federal government. I won&#8217;t attempt to justify slavery, but there were a host of concerns greater than that of slavery which led to the war between the states. I would get a hold of Thomas E. Woods&#8217; book, &#8216;The Politically Incorrect Gide to American History&#8217; as a good start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluffcreek1967</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5238050</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluffcreek1967]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5238050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nonsense! I try as best as I can to follow where the evidence leads - and I would urge you to do the same. It&#039;s simplistic to say that I&#039;ve only chosen to believe one book over another when you probably haven&#039;t read the same books yourselves. 


Moreover, Thomas Dilorenzo&#039;s works have been criticized here and there, but they have never been intellectually and historically refuted. Many historians, in fact, have sheepishly admitted that he&#039;s right. It&#039;s embarrassing, however, in light of how Lincoln has been glorified throughout our nation to publicly admit such things. 


I urge you to read his books and make up your own mind. But as the old adage goes, &#039;A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nonsense! I try as best as I can to follow where the evidence leads &#8211; and I would urge you to do the same. It&#8217;s simplistic to say that I&#8217;ve only chosen to believe one book over another when you probably haven&#8217;t read the same books yourselves. </p>
<p>Moreover, Thomas Dilorenzo&#8217;s works have been criticized here and there, but they have never been intellectually and historically refuted. Many historians, in fact, have sheepishly admitted that he&#8217;s right. It&#8217;s embarrassing, however, in light of how Lincoln has been glorified throughout our nation to publicly admit such things. </p>
<p>I urge you to read his books and make up your own mind. But as the old adage goes, &#8216;A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluffcreek1967</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5238048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluffcreek1967]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5238048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t doubt that there were some honorable things about Lincoln the man. But in spite of what you were told in school, Lincoln did some very un-American and unconstitutional things. He also said things racially that I would happen to agree with, but which would go over in today&#039;s political climate like a fart in an elevator! You need to read a little wider than perhaps you have. And if my memory serves me correct, Thomas Dilorenzo is not a liberal, and his works have not been intellectually or historically refuted by the other American historians.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t doubt that there were some honorable things about Lincoln the man. But in spite of what you were told in school, Lincoln did some very un-American and unconstitutional things. He also said things racially that I would happen to agree with, but which would go over in today&#8217;s political climate like a fart in an elevator! You need to read a little wider than perhaps you have. And if my memory serves me correct, Thomas Dilorenzo is not a liberal, and his works have not been intellectually or historically refuted by the other American historians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lady Val</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5238043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lady Val]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5238043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All the Marxist/socialist/fascist tyranny we have today is a direct consequence of the policies of Abraham Lincoln. You don&#039;t like intrusive government? Then you cannot &quot;like&quot; Lincoln! You don&#039;t approve of your God-given (supposedly) constitutionally protected liberties infringed? Then you cannot &quot;approve&quot; of Lincoln. You reject warfare that murders civilian non-combatants? Then you must reject Lincoln. You condemn the hostile &quot;race relations&quot; in the nation? Then you must condemn Lincoln for it was his administration that pitted black against white as a strategy of war. You bemoan the fact that the Constitution is a worthless relic of a long-dead past? Then you must blame Lincoln for he totally discarded it so as to provide for the triumph of the State over the Founding Principles of the nation.



On the other hand, if you believe - as does Antonin Scalia - that force of arms
de-legitimized the constitutional right of succession, then you believe - as did Lincoln - that &quot;might makes right.&quot; And if you believe - as does John Bolton - that covering a government policy or action, however wicked, with &quot;The Flag&quot; makes it moral and legal, then you believe - as did Lincoln - that &quot;the ends justify the means.&quot; Far too many conservatives worship a man whose system of government was more Marx than Jefferson and whose use of power was more Hitler than Washington.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the Marxist/socialist/fascist tyranny we have today is a direct consequence of the policies of Abraham Lincoln. You don&#8217;t like intrusive government? Then you cannot &#8220;like&#8221; Lincoln! You don&#8217;t approve of your God-given (supposedly) constitutionally protected liberties infringed? Then you cannot &#8220;approve&#8221; of Lincoln. You reject warfare that murders civilian non-combatants? Then you must reject Lincoln. You condemn the hostile &#8220;race relations&#8221; in the nation? Then you must condemn Lincoln for it was his administration that pitted black against white as a strategy of war. You bemoan the fact that the Constitution is a worthless relic of a long-dead past? Then you must blame Lincoln for he totally discarded it so as to provide for the triumph of the State over the Founding Principles of the nation.</p>
<p>On the other hand, if you believe &#8211; as does Antonin Scalia &#8211; that force of arms<br />
de-legitimized the constitutional right of succession, then you believe &#8211; as did Lincoln &#8211; that &#8220;might makes right.&#8221; And if you believe &#8211; as does John Bolton &#8211; that covering a government policy or action, however wicked, with &#8220;The Flag&#8221; makes it moral and legal, then you believe &#8211; as did Lincoln &#8211; that &#8220;the ends justify the means.&#8221; Far too many conservatives worship a man whose system of government was more Marx than Jefferson and whose use of power was more Hitler than Washington.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DebRollin</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5237857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DebRollin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5237857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember, Most teachers are liberals, they don&#039;t even teach the Constitution of the United States or correct history, thats how they have dumbed down our youth and tried to dumb down America.  Yes, its very pathetic to elect leaders who really don&#039;t care about the people they 
serve.  Its a Banana Republic...kickbacks, buy and sell votes, say what they must to get elected, and then break their word.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, Most teachers are liberals, they don&#8217;t even teach the Constitution of the United States or correct history, thats how they have dumbed down our youth and tried to dumb down America.  Yes, its very pathetic to elect leaders who really don&#8217;t care about the people they<br />
serve.  Its a Banana Republic&#8230;kickbacks, buy and sell votes, say what they must to get elected, and then break their word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everett Vulgamore</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5237696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Everett Vulgamore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5237696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i personally think that Lincoln is awesome for ONE thing: he kept the Union together. isnt that reason enough?

on the flipside though, i think that if revolution were to break out to rid America of our current government people and liberal &quot;progressives&quot;, and replace them with the ones that have brains, it would be a good thing. if the liberals all move to California to save themselves, and form their own country after that, i say go right ahead and nuke it.



maybe im just too brutal]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i personally think that Lincoln is awesome for ONE thing: he kept the Union together. isnt that reason enough?</p>
<p>on the flipside though, i think that if revolution were to break out to rid America of our current government people and liberal &#8220;progressives&#8221;, and replace them with the ones that have brains, it would be a good thing. if the liberals all move to California to save themselves, and form their own country after that, i say go right ahead and nuke it.</p>
<p>maybe im just too brutal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everett Vulgamore</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5237695</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Everett Vulgamore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5237695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you must be old, because all ive ever heard from most high school city teachers is that the left is THE answer to everything. it makes me sad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you must be old, because all ive ever heard from most high school city teachers is that the left is THE answer to everything. it makes me sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gray_man</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5237662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gray_man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5237662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the slave holders were like, um the muslims who have been doing it for centuries and continue to this day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the slave holders were like, um the muslims who have been doing it for centuries and continue to this day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gray_man</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5237661</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gray_man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5237661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nonsense, Lincoln is no more responsible for the deaths of 600,000 people then the people who thought it was OK to enslave their fellow man. If there was no slavery, the civil war would not have happened.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nonsense, Lincoln is no more responsible for the deaths of 600,000 people then the people who thought it was OK to enslave their fellow man. If there was no slavery, the civil war would not have happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gray_man</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5237659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gray_man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5237659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[meh ... you chose to believe one book over another.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meh &#8230; you chose to believe one book over another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DebRollin</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lincoln-unbound/comment-page-1/#comment-5237624</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DebRollin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194288#comment-5237624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please note that instead of Occupying a park or city, Occupy Wallstreet is on the websites hacking and attacking anyone with a brain left. The only thing we don&#039;t see is the rape, syringes, and excrement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please note that instead of Occupying a park or city, Occupy Wallstreet is on the websites hacking and attacking anyone with a brain left. The only thing we don&#8217;t see is the rape, syringes, and excrement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 730/767 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 01:31:32 by W3 Total Cache -->