New York Times Now Acting as Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s PR Team

new york times loves terror

There is no way to know what tomorrow may bring. There may be floods and there may be hurricanes. There may be muggings and murders. But the one thing we can be sure of is that the parade of sympathetic stories about the Muslim terrorists who bombed the Boston Marathon will continue.

The terrorist propagandists ply their trade with the same relentlessness that terrorists like Tamerlan Tsarnaev ply theirs. They have no sense of right and wrong and no sense of decency either.

And so the paper of record, whose record is that of defending terrorists, is at it again. Before the Boston Marathon bombings, the New York Times ran an op-ed from one of Osama bin Laden’s bodyguards whining about his hunger strike. After the bombings, it keeps running sympathetic pieces about the bombers.

The latest such piece tries to spin a new narrative that Tamerlan Tsarnaev only turned to terrorism because immigration rules at the Golden Gloves prevented him from competing.

The narrative contradicts much of what we know from other sources. Tamerlan Tsarnaev told his father that he was giving up boxing because he believed it was against Islam. And Tamerlan Tsarnaev had lost an earlier match, though the New York Times insists, based on a quote from his coach, that he really should have won.

And there you go. A perfectly nice Chechen loses a boxing match and then gets shut out from the competition for a year until he gets his citizenship. And then he gets shut out from obtaining citizenship due to domestic violence and terrorism and he has no choice but to turn to terrorism.

The narrative is slimy and dishonest. And it points toward Appeasement Avenue.

The idea is that if you don’t give a Muslim everything he wants, if you don’t bend over backward to provide him with special treatment, he may turn to terrorism. And then you’re responsible for the murders of those he kills.

It’s obscene. It’s self-destructive. It’s liberalism.

  • Gee59

    Well at least it consistent with their support of terrorism against Israel. The NYT always supports terrorism I have to wonder why though

  • guest

    Hmmm, what could Carlos Slim have to do with it? Follow the money!

  • Johnconrad

    Self-hatred manifests itself in many ways.

  • Moz

    Can we stop using the word liberalism. You can't accuse them of being against free speech and call them liberal at the same time.

    • pmyers

      Oh, but you can. Liberals are indeed in favor of free speech, as long as the speech expresses an opinion with which they agree. If an expressed opinion goes against liberalism, then it must be silenced. It's not a hard concept to grasp.

      • rulieg

        Moz has a point, though. these current "liberals" are not classic, traditional liberals in any sense of the word. we really should call them leftists.

        • NAHALKIDES

          Right – they are properly called Leftists, not "liberals" since they are first or second-generation members of the New Left, and are anything but liberal in the proper sense of "liberty".

  • http://www.adinakutnicki.com AdinaK

    Well, the Chechen bombers were THAT close to blowing up NYC…but never mind…perhaps the blind as a bat media needs some remedial lessons re what "animated" their jihad – http://adinakutnicki.com/2013/04/26/us-western-wa

    I dare them to refute one word of the above facts on the ground…

    Adina Kutnicki, Israel http://adinakutnicki.com/about/

  • Spikey1

    Note; the president's new address:

    1600 Appeasement Ave NW
    Washington, DC 20006

    He didn't move, he just changed the name of the street.

  • simplzSimon

    The narrative is slimy and dishonest. And it points toward Appeasement Avenue. Slimy and dishonest! Blowing up Boston and committing widescale slaughter because of losing a boxing competition??? And the gray lady accepted THAT for an excuse… I wonder how the Times would have explained Hinckley’s ( believe

  • simpleSimon

    HInckley's rather bizarre attempt to attract Jodi Foster's attention. Was the poor boy denied an autograph? OOps sorry, that was a Republican president so I suppose no Appeasement avenue was needed.

  • owmyballs

    American bigotry is to blame for islamic terrorism? Social justice would remove the need for more attacks? No wonder the NYT has lower circulation than “The Watchtower.”

  • jakespoon

    The NYT wouldn't make good toilet paper for my grandaddy's outhouse. Too much crap on it already.

  • slider 96

    Spontaneous jihad , you could be watching a football game on your wide screen , putting back beers and wings …..then ………blow some innocent people up . Your team lost !
    This kid got it from his mother , he should have never been let into this country and if so under close scrutiny . No one wants to say IT'S ISLAM .

  • spark777

    uptil I saw the check which said $4244, I accept that my brothers friend was like they say actualy taking home money parttime on their apple laptop.. there friend brother has done this 4 only 7 months and just paid the mortgage on there villa and bourt a gorgeous Porsche 911. I went here, kep2.com

    • owmyballs

      Spunk666,

      tell me more about the stupidest spam atttack I've ever seen. Can I get a baby d!ck like yours in ten easy payments or do I have to snort draino brfore I can paid the mortgage on mys villa and bourt a gorgeous Porsche 911?

  • Donna Daniel

    Praying in Jesus’ name.

    via Red White Blue News.com, “Study time! Because we are not low-information voters. If you don’t have time now, bookmark this one for later. I always hear how evil Christianity is on the basis that — but, but, but the CRUSADES! In the context of history, even the crusades were self defense…” ~mkw

    Why We Are Afraid of Islam, A 1400 Year Secret, by Dr Bill Warner

    Published on Sep 16, 2012

    – Two highlight of those in a hurry: Watch the presentation at 12:10 and 30:40

    – The history of Islam in Europe and how it effects us to this day. This is a history based on numbers and facts that you may not see anywhere else and explains why we may be afraid to see Islam for what it is based on its own doctrine and practice
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embed

  • http://www.marquezvsbradley.net marquez vs bradley

    A stunning win by the winner. It's a stepping for him to make it to the professional fights.