Obama Is Too Smart to Fail

obama67We all know that George W. Bush was a moron. And we all know that Obama is a genius. We have been told by Valerie Jarrett, by his media lapdogs and even by the great man himself that he is just too smart to do his job. And it’s reasonable that a genius would be bored by the tedious tasks involved in running the most powerful nation on earth.

But what is “smart” anyway? What makes Obama a genius? It’s not his IQ. It’s probably not his grades or we would have seen them already. It’s that he makes his supporters feel smart. The perception of intelligence is really a reflection.

Smart once used to be an unreachable quality. Einstein was proclaimed a genius, because it was said that no one understood his theories. Those were undemocratic times when it was assumed that the eggheads playing with the atom had to be a lot smarter than us or we were in big trouble.

Intelligence has since been democratized. Smart has been redistributed. Anyone can get an A for effort. And the impulse of manufactured intelligence is not smart people, but people who make us feel smart. That is why Neil deGrasse Tyson, another obsessively self-promoting mediocrity like Carl Sagan, is now the new face of science. Sagan made science-illiterate liberals feel smart while pandering to their biases. Tyson does the same thing for the Twitter generation.

Self-esteem is the new intelligence. Obama’s intelligence was manufactured by pandering to the biases and tastes of his supporters. The more he shared their biases and tastes, the smarter he seemed to be and the smarter they felt by having so much in common with such a smart man.

Everyone who encountered him thought that he was smart because he made them feel smart. And that is the supreme duty of the modern liberal intellectual, not to be smart, but to make others feel smart. Genuine intelligence is threatening. Manufactured intelligence is soothing. And those intellectually superior progressives who need to believe that Obama is smart in order to believe that they are smart cannot stop believing in his brains without confronting the illusion of their own intelligence.

Intelligence to a modern liberal isn’t depth; it’s appearance. It isn’t even an intellectual quality, but a spiritual quality. Compassionate people who care about others are always “smarter”, no matter how stupid they might be, because they care about the world around them.

That’s not just the DNA of every other New York Times column, TED talk and important book by an equally important thought leader. It’s also the DNA of Obama Inc which exploits the assumption of intelligence through compassionate self-involvement and the sanctification of the spiritual power of the Other to transcend the rational. It is upscale Oprah; egotism masquerading as enlightenment, condescension as compassion and soothing quotes as religion.

Marxists thought that Marxism was smart. Progressives measure intelligence in progressivism. Its only two qualities are “world awareness” and “progressive future adaptation”.

Obama hit both these qualities perfectly with his Third Culture background and the appearance of modern technocratic polish. Not just a politician, but a thought leader, he had the pseudo-celebrity quality of their kind, able to move smoothly from a celebrity panel about Third World microfinance, to a Jay-Z concert to a banquet for a political hack.

Obama and his supporters mistake their orgy of mutual flattery for intelligence and depth. The thought never rises within this bubble of manufactured intelligence that all of them might really be idiots who have convinced themselves that they are geniuses because they read the right books (or pretend to read them), watch the right movies and shows (or pretend to) and have the right values (or pretend to).

Smart is surplus when you have Gladwell sitting under a full DVD set of The Wire prominently displayed on your bookshelf right alongside a signed copy of The Audacity of Hope.

But manufactured intelligence isn’t smart. It’s stupid. It’s as stupid as building windmills for sustainable energy in places where the wind hardly blows, as stupid as calling inflated budgets “investments” and as stupid as believing that a man is smart because he can reference poverty in the Third World.

Manufactured intelligence is a consensus, not a debate. It’s correct because everyone says so. It mistakes feeling for thinking. It deals not with how things are or even how we would like them to be, but how we feel about the way things are and what our feelings about the way things are say about what kind of people we are.

Liberal intelligence is largely concerned with the latter. It is a self-esteem project for mediocre elites, the sons and daughters of the formerly accomplished who are constantly diving into the shallow pools of their own minds to explore how their privilege and entitlement makes them view the world and how they can be good people by challenging everyone’s paradigms and how they can think outside the box by climbing into it and pulling the flaps shut behind them.

Perpetual self-involvement isn’t intelligence regardless of how many of the linguistic tricks of memoir fiction it borrows to endow its liberal self-help section with the appearance of nobility. Liberalism isn’t really about making the world a better place. It’s about reassuring the elites that they are good people for wanting to rule over it.

That is why Obama received the Nobel Peace Prize for having good intentions. His actual foreign policy mattered less than the appearance of a new transformative foreign policy.

Liberal intelligence exists on the illusion of its self-worth. The magical thinking that guides it in every other area from economics to diplomacy also convinces it that if it believes it is smart, that it will be. The impenetrable liberal consensus in every area is based on this delusion of intelligence. Every policy is right because it’s smart and it’s smart because it’s progressive and it’s progressive because smart progressives say that it is.

Progressives manufacture the consensus of their own intelligence and insist that it proves them right.

Imagine a million people walking in a circle and shouting, “WE’RE SMART AND WE’RE RIGHT. WE’RE RIGHT BECAUSE WE’RE SMART. WE’RE SMART BECAUSE WE’RE RIGHT.” Now imagine that they dominate academia and the entertainment industry allowing them to spend billions yelling their idiot message until it outshouts everyone else while ignoring the disasters in their wake because they are too smart to fail.

That is progressivism. That is why Obama is too smart to fail.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

  • ZZ

    Oh yeah. His phony speech cadence is not only annoying but flat out bizzare. Nobody on the planet speaks that way but him. His handlers are freaks for coaching him to do it and his public supporters are morons.

  • paendragon

    Liberal ‘discourse’ is all about image over reality, form over substance, and lies over Truth. At best it’s tautological: a spew of disjointed, circumlocutionary non-sequiturs. But lying is the most basic form of theft – it’s fraud, the theft of the Truth, which is a crime.

    Liberals are criminals! They act like silly victims when they demand that the large gangs called “governments” should be forced to give them their own “dignity!”

    They each compete to out-do each other as the next “Though-Leader!” while ignoring that discovering objective facts and being able to teach them to others, doesn’t make one a permanent leader, but only demonstrates temporarily that one is a good teacher.

    Liberals are all about image over reality, form over substance, and lies over Truth.

    Because of their eternally pre-emptively adversarial, ritualistic and idolatrous stance, they are unfit to govern even their own lives, much less others: they will automatically see any and all problems they are faced with, as unavoidable and predetermined forces of nature or acts of God which cannot be avoided, much less conquered – every problem, crime, or perversion presented to them for which they can be held accountable or responsible, they will seek to automatically compromise with and/or Submit to, preferably while blaming others for daring to suggest they had any other choice but to do so.

    They are idolaters, always selling symptoms to avoid causes, and slanderously paranoid: always on the lookout for others’ outrages and crimes to defend themselves from or compare themselves to (argumentum tu quoque) to dilute their own even only potential culpability with. Those who are good at making excuses, are seldom good for anything else, as Ben Franklin once noticed. They will always secretly scheme to seek to selfishly, pre-emptively “defend” them selves, rather than ever risk beeing wrong in an effort to collaboratively cooperate with others in a symbiotic effort to come to understand an objective truth and thereby fix a mistake or solve a problem.

    They will thus also by default automatically always end up exploiting unsolved problems by leaving them unsolved (thus committing criminal negligence), and act as solutions in search of problems, wanting and agitating to fix what’s not broken. They thus fail upwards and often get promoted for ruining everything.

    Their motto must be: “There’s No Money In Solutions!”

  • pfbonney

    We can only hope.

  • Well Done

    Comparisons between Nixon and 0bama are odious. 0bama did more crooked things before he was even elected President than Nixon did the whole time he was in office.

    • Drifter12

      On an order of magnitude…

  • ylem

    I have a genius IQ and cannot stand talking with Liberals. They don’t use reason or logic and that just leads to frustration on my part. They can’t seem to think for themselves either n

  • http://www.MARVINFOX.com/ Marvin E. Fox

    Liberal intellect is a product of PR more than mental ability. Obama’s PR confederates in the Media can no longer support his screwed up Obamacare or alibi his lack of ability to address the many jobs he should have found necessary to take care of. Take delivering weapons to Mexican drug cartels, and keep going through the various government agencies until you arrive at his latest unilateral and illegal change of law to protect Obamacare. I see Obama as a very active and politically protected politician. Is that intellect, or is it the bad idea that one can get away with doing, or not doing, the reverse of the things one has accepted the duty of doing, or not doing?
    There is an old saying that goes, “If you want to dance, you have to pay the fiddler.” I think I see the fiddler a little way offstage, fixing his bow.
    Marvin Fox

  • sonofseawolf

    Oh, boy i wish i hadnt wasted my time reading that. You see someone once and then you follow them because that first contact was fun. But then you end up here. Wanting the last few minutes of your life back.
    Protect yourself at all times 14/5

  • http://www.abay.vn/Ve-quoc-te/ve-may-bay-di-tay-ban-nha Nhóm Đào Tạo

    How does one actually dl that bg

    vé máy bay di Anh
    vé máy bay di Tây Ban Nha

  • veeper

    of course obama doesn’t fail….

    it just looks like he fails to un-smart people…..

  • USARetired

    There is nothing intelligent nor smart about a criminal or liar, and Obama qualify s for both!