- FrontPage Magazine - http://www.frontpagemag.com -
Obama Judicial Nominee Claims Abstinence Education is Unconstitutional
Posted By Daniel Greenfield On July 26, 2013 @ 11:17 am In The Point | 20 Comments
“Unconstitutional”, like “hate crime” is just how liberals express their dislike of something. It has no basis in actual law. It’s just their exercise of personal whim.
Among some of her greatest hits, the former Deputy Assistant Attorney General argues that abortion is necessary to help “free women from historically routine conscription into maternity.”
She takes the opportunity in some of her writings to slam anyone who opposes the abortion-contraception mandate as “reinforce[ing] broader patterns of discrimination against women as a class of presumptive breeders.”
Nina wrote a 2011 paper, “Against the New Maternalism,” which argues that by celebrating motherhood, society is creating a “self-fulfilling cycle of discrimination.”
Here are some quotes from the introduction to the work of this visionary of human affairs.
The most influential and resistant obstacle to actualizing gender equality is the continuing cultural practice of romanticizing the mother as the best possible caretaker.
As the Court has recognized, we cannot simply accept existing gendered family patterns as results of freely made individual choices. Persistently gendered family care becomes self-fulfilling, and solidifies the very inequalities — economic, political and social — that the law strives to dislodge. Given that mothers’ unequal burden in the home is a fulcrum of broader sex discrimination, it is particularly disturbing that one of the most persistent strains in contemporary culture is a celebration of mothers’ domesticity and their role as the default parent
Cheerful stuff. I suspect Pillard isn’t a fan of flags or apple pies either. They probably reinforce all sorts of norms.
Those ideas bleed into Pillard’s extreme pro-abortion views, which suggest that technology is somehow manipulating Americans to consider the personhood of the unborn. In one of her most jaw-dropping statements, the President’s nominee even criticizes the ultrasound. She believes it manufactures “deceptive images of fetus-as-autonomous-being that the anti-choice movement has popularized since the advent of amniocentesis.”
In “Our Other Reproductive Choices,” Nina argues that abstinence-only curriculum is “permeated with stereotyped messages and sex-based double standards” which, in her mind, makes it “vulnerable to an equal protection challenge.”
Finally. Someone who makes Nancy Pelosi seem reasonable.
Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://www.frontpagemag.com
URL to article: http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obama-judicial-nominee-claims-abstinence-education-is-unconstitutional/
Copyright © 2009 FrontPage Magazine. All rights reserved.