Obama: “The Taliban are Not Our Enemies and We Don’t Want to Fight Them.”

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.


20130108Obama_and_Karzai

It’s one compulsive liar who hates America and supports terrorists quoting another one. But it seem plausible enough.

Karzai confirmed that the Obama Administration actually told him that the Taliban, which provided al Qaeda its base of support for September 11, was not an enemy of the U.S. He said:

Last year, during my visit to Washington, in a very important briefing a day before I met U.S. President [Barack Obama], his national security adviser Tom Donilon, and senior White House officials, generals, and intelligence officials, the national security adviser met with me. He told me: “The Taliban are not our enemies and we don’t want to fight them.”

If Obama really believes that, and certainly his willingness to negotiate with the Taliban and to release high-ranking Taliban prisoners, without at least exchanging them for Sgt Bowe Bergdahl still being held in captivity, suggests he does, why are we still there?

Al Qaeda was hardly a presence in Afghanistan during Obama’s surge. So why did Obama approve a massive military surge? He repeatedly claimed it was against Al Qaeda, but there were something like 100 Al Qaeda there.

As he justified sending 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan at a cost of $30 billion a year, President Barack Obama’s description Tuesday of the al Qaeda “cancer” in that country left out one key fact: U.S. intelligence officials have concluded there are only about 100 al Qaeda fighters in the entire country.

A senior U.S. intelligence official told ABCNews.com the approximate estimate of 100 al Qaeda members left in Afghanistan reflects the conclusion of American intelligence agencies and the Defense Department. The relatively small number was part of the intelligence passed on to the White House as President Obama conducted his deliberations.

So under him over 1,500 American soldiers died fighting an enemy that Obama never believed was our enemy? And they died because he tied their hands with rules of engagement that did not let them defend themselves.

  • john spielman

    until the west stops this insane policical correctness and speaks the truth we are doomed to repeat this farce of a war, but next time it will be in Europe or even in the USA.
    The enemy is ISLAM! They are ideologically and theologically at war with all who are not of the “house of Islam”( though the house of islam is not united and is destined to fall ). According to Islamic theology we who are not muslims belong to the “house of war” and must be fought with all things from guns and bombs to even deception, even our own democratic prossess (mass imigration of muslims to the nonislamic countries along with high muslim birth rates to seize control via the ballot as a majority, then change the laws to aparttheid sharia -Lebanon is an example )
    Islam is the antithesis of the Gospel of Jesus Chrtist, and is a malevolent works righteous theology that sanctifies (make holy) violence- murder rape theft lying and pedophilia as that demon possessed pseudoprophet Muhammed, considered the “perfect man” in Islam, demonstarted to the world.

    • GSR

      Political correctness combined with the importing ever growing numbers of Muslim immigrants. Utter stupidity.

      • Lynn Rivera

        It is not simply stupidity. It is a well-calculated scheme. What kind of name is Barack? What kind of name is Hussein? You would think he would have changed his name to look more American, but that is his hubris.

        • http://www.facebook.com/haggios haggios

          “Barack” means “lightning.” “Obama” means “from heaven.” Read the story of Lucifer’s fall in the bible, and then substitute those two words where it says Lucifer fell like lightning from heaven, and see what you get.

          • Lynn Rivera

            Wow, Haggios, I didn’t know that! Well, that explains everything! What does Haggios mean?

          • Valtresca

            Yeah, he was an arab king that persecuted the jews whose name meant light bringer. when the old testament was translated to the King James version of the bible that arab king’s name was translated to Lucifer, based on roman astronomy, Lucifer is the morning star, which is what light bringer was translated to. The pentagon became a symbol for Lucifer only because of roman astronomy. In one year Venus appears to the earth as the morning star 5 times and if you pin point t hose occurences on a circle it forms a perfect pentagon if you draw lines between the points and pentagram.

          • Valtresca

            our dealings with the middle east and our wars by proxy between Russia and China have only to do with one thing OIL. Allowing them into Eastern European countries and the US to gain political power and the funding of mosques is all to appease Saudi Arabia, which is Nato/US’s strongest ally in that region besides Israel and France who stricter than us about the hidden Muslim agenda to infilitrate these countries culture, polticis, media, need I say more.

            People forget too that we supported the mujahedeen in Afghanistan to fight against Russia in a war by proxy back in the 80s, when we left we stopped our support and left the afghanis to fend for themselves, they changed their name to Al Quaida and became under the leadership of Bin Laden who was already in the war business with mujahedeen and at that time had our support. So we have been supporting Al Quaida to fight against Russians even before Syria.

            The headquarters in Benghazi was being used as an outpost to funnel money, intelligence and weapons to the Syrian rebels and Al Quaida to fight against the Russian backed Asad regime. Before that it was used to funnel weapons and money from London, Paris, Rome, and Washington (always us NATO) to anti Muamar Gaddafi militias while Gaddafi’s regime was being backed by Russia and China in Libya. Under the Obama administration We bombarded Chinese shipments of arms to Gadaffi to destroy and break the Beijing-Libya oil ties because China had planned to make Libya its primary source of oil.

            We did the same thing in 1999 with Russia-China backed Yugoslavia and our bombs hit the Chinese embassy killing 3 people. When Obama had Gaddafi killed it was an act of war against Russia and China but people don’t know that or don’t acknowledge it. If we would have attacked Syria that would have been the last straw. Russia and China have publicly said “The air attacks are an announcement that the West wants to dominate the world,” and “The West still believes down to its very bones that it’s the leader of the world.” Putin has denounced democracy and sees our two party system as a laughable failure because we can’t really accomplish anything significant here in our country through bi-partisanship. Our military is being run to where it no longer serves the best interests of the American people.

            This might give people some insight into what really happened in Benghazi but they will never tell the American public and continue to say that our assistance to these rebel groups is “non-lethal military aid” but the funny part is that there are UN mandates, basically rules for this kind of proxy warfare over control the world’s oil supply, so it is all a game to the permanent 5 UN members, Russia, China, America, UK and France, but Russia and China are saying that we have exceeded our mandates.

            Russia has recently acted in defiance of NATO by arming and positioning nuclear rocket launchers in S. America towards the US. China is building or has built a nuclear submarine base off the coast of Cuba. They both have destroyers and aircraft carriers strategically placed throughout the gulf region. People need to wake up, America is in a weakened state right now and being crippled from with in by our own government.

            Our military is intentionally being thrown into battles in these M. Eastern countries where our hands ore tied behind our backs. Military Leaders have intentionally imposed rules that don’t allow our American soldiers and marines to fight to the best of their ability in order to appease UN mandates in order to level the playing field between our troops and the people we are fighting, sometimes we are not allowed to do anything even when being fired upon because if we exceed those UN rules of engagment it would be a violation. Wars cannot be fought and won when the rules are holding us back.

            And what are we fighting for back home in US, look at what is going on our rights are being taken away, we have people that don’t care about our country screaming me me me. Our military is being used to enforce political correctness and must themselves adhere to those PC values which clearly violate the constitution. But no one cares about that America anymore but people will wake up when Russia rolls into the first American city to perform a “drill” that we gave them permission to do in order to appease them under the threat of thermo-nuclear war, but just wait if you think I’m making this up.

            I’m neither republican or democrat because they are both jokes now. One repeats what its demagogues tell them whether it’s fox news or msnbc and it’s all bull shit designed to distract you from what’s really going on. America is up for sale to anyone that wants a piece hell we’re just giving it away, pretty soon our civilians will be turned into slaves, just like China’s people and India’s people if we don’t do something about it and all the me me me’s will be forced into slave labor. They’re tired of us thinking we can have our cake and eat it too and that goes right down to the actions and beliefs of our uninformed public.

          • Allan477

            My Arab Christian friends tell me that Barack, or Baracket, means Blessed. I suspect that their information is more reliable than yours.

          • billobillo54

            Read the Bible. Read the O.T. A major theme is God’s faithfulness to Israel. Start with Jeremiah 31.

    • Warren Raymond

      The enemy are Obama and the swine who made him POTUS!

    • USARetired

      You are entirely correct on the Islam issue! They are our very worst ever enemy, who fully intend to conquer and annihilate us, and O’Bozo the ‘Dingle Barry’, unqualified to lead parade of Clown’s, is helping them!

    • Lynn Rivera

      Well, you have built a case for Obama being their leader. He is of like-mind and principles.

    • Nelson Stanley

      Better to kill them in the first trench than the last !!

    • nood2

      You’re right, but THEY are NOT listening to your obvious evidence.
      So with all this correct knowledge, what are you doing about it?

    • Khadim Hussain

      Stop using such blasphemous words against the prophet of Islam. The Muslims are not terrorist. The act of an individual cannot be considered as that of the whole of community. A good car cannot be blamed if it is not driven properly. Be careful while speaking about the holy personalities.

  • http://fdnyretiree.com/ Ed FDNYRetiree

    I beg to differ you traitorous bum!

    Yes, we do!

  • pennant8

    As much as I hate to admit it, there is some truth in Obama’s statement that the Taliban is not our enemy. At least they didn’t used to be. We kind of adopted them as a substitute enemy after Al Qaeda moved on to other places. The Taliban is primarily an indegenous group focused on strict sharia, although there are some signs that they are expanding outward following in Al Qaeda’s footsteps. The Taliban is the enemy of the Afghan people who prefer living under the generic brand of sharia instead of the industrial strength brand even though they don’t seem all that committed to ridding themselves of the enforces of the industrial strength brand.
    I think the assertion that Afghanistan was the safe haven for the 9/11 hijackers is a little exaggerated. While it is true that OBL had his HQ there, his operatives were not based there. They were moving around freely in various first-world countries. None of them were Afghan’s, most were Saudi’s as was OBL himself. Mohamed Atta was an Egytian who had much closer ties with a radical mosque in Hamburg, Germany than with Afghanistan, although he did visit there for some face to face with OBL. But when you come right down to it, the 9/11 hijackers real safe have was right here in the homeland. After all, it’s so much easier to plan something on the scale of 9/11 working out of a condo in San Diego than from a cave in Afghanistan.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      “As much as I hate to admit it, there is some truth in Obama’s statement that the Taliban is not our enemy. At least they didn’t used to be. We kind of adopted them as a substitute enemy after Al Qaeda moved on to other places. The Taliban is primarily an indegenous group focused on strict sharia, although there are some signs that they are expanding outward following in Al Qaeda’s footsteps.”

      The Taliban does not appear to have interest in transnational expansion unless you count Pakistan. The Taliban hosted AQ knowingly, which is an international jihadi movement usually using perfidious violent means. Therefore the Taliban is our enemy until this is reconciled. It’s been reconciled through appeasement and pretense. The Taliban may not be our enemy, but we are the Taliban’s enemy.

      They’ll host violent international jihadis until we truly reconcile these issues.

      • A Z

        They refused to turnover a war criminal not just any criminal. That made the Taliban our enemy.

        How is the Taliban not our enemy?

        We asked them to extradite Osama. they refused on the grounds he was their guest and it was Pashtun custom. He was their guess and it is there custom. But the guest is not suppose to cause problems and they asked him more than once not to cause problems and he disobeyed. But they did not punish him. This is documented in the book “The Looming Tower”

        Instead of extraditing him they suggested trial in another country. If we had a trail in Uzbekistan and Osama was not convicted after Al Qaeda claiming credit, what would you suggest we do.

        I am not exactly sure what the Taliban wanted to do. Maybe they wanted Osama gone, but they could not give him up since they are all Muslim. So trial in another Muslim country would be a face saving way of bowing out and washing their hands of Osama, a pain in their b_tt.

        Maybe there were counting on anti American sentiment (in any country), or anti-kafir sentiment (in the Ummah) to get an acquittal.

        Maybe they were counting on trying to be reasonable and knowing we could not accept trial in a 3rd country, so they know they offer would not be accepted.

        They refused to turnover a war criminal not just any criminal. That made the Taliban our enemy.

        • objectivefactsmatter

          “They refused to turnover a war criminal not just any criminal. That made the Taliban our enemy.”

          Right. And the irony of all this discussion right now is that Iran is even worse. Only Iran can make the Taliban look benign by comparison.

          But they’re all our friends because Dear Leader says so.

        • ObamaYoMoma

          They refused to turnover a war criminal not just any criminal. That made the Taliban our enemy.

          Yet the Afghani Muslims (former Northern Alliance Muslims) led by the Karsai government we have been propping up for all these many years with trillions of dollars and the lives of our young servicemen and women and ever since shortly after the 9/11 violent jihad attacks are not our enemies relative to the Taliban, AQ, and all other Muslims in the world in your book? Oh please further elaborate on that one. That would be very interesting. Indeed, I suppose those Afghani Muslims are some of those very few illusive and hard to find so-called “moderate Muslims.” Sort of like the Iraqi Muslims, you know. Yeah right.

          Meanwhile, no one reports are yet points out the fact that the nation-building missions in both Afghanistan and Iraq are the two biggest strategic blunders ever in American history and that both major political parties that strictly adhere to the insanity of multiculturalism and political correctness, which are both forms of Cultural Communism, are responsible for the unhinged madness. Indeed, what else could you call aiding, abetting, and propping up your own fricking enemies because you are too blind to see?

          • A Z

            I never said the Afghanis were our enemies.

            I did say the Taliban were.

            You are arguing that nation building is wrong. It is a point worth arguing. Yet we did nation build in Germany and Japan.

            Yet arguing against nation building then one has to come up with a solution about what to do about ungoverned space. Critics feel no need because they say it is not a pressing issue therefore they do not feel compelled to offer a comprehensive solution but only to nit pick.

          • defcon 4

            Not every German was a Nazi, but all muslimes are fascists, for the mere reason they subscribe to a religion that advocates totalitarian subjugation of everyone not muslime and a genocide of Jews.

          • A Z

            “Not every German was a Na-zi” -Defcon 4

            You cannot prove that to many people. They’ll say Germans at least acquiesced or were neutral to the NDSAP. That there were plots against Der Fuhrer or opposition groups they will say they were small and inconsequential like “the White Rose”.

            However, the Allies used their material in propaganda campaign to undermine NDSAP and shorten the war. What is ironic is the some of the same people that would say the White Rose is inconsequential will support every leftist student group protesting whatever.

            Sure NDSAP had control of Germany and there was not much dissent. But part of that and not an inconsequential part was that it was a police state that murdered and interned its opponents.

          • A Z

            Case in point

            NDSAP executed Helmuth James Graf von Moltke

            He came from a very famous German lineage.

          • TienBing

            There is no comparison between rebuilding the infrastructure of an advanced modern industrial nation which we completely destroyed; whose culture and civilization we share, and trying to build a modern civilization from scratch on the foundation of 7th century barbarism and savagery.

          • A Z

            Kabul and Herat and other cities were not in the 7th century.

            Let’s just say for arguments sake that 5 or 10% of Afghanis were in the 20th century and the rest in some other century. Is that enough to give up on nation building? Do you leave it as ungoverned space of badly governed space?

            Under the Taliban Afghanistan was poorly governed. It had bad consequences for us. They went with tribal law in stead of international law and refused extradition of war criminals.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Totally 100 percent oblivious. Unbelievable.

          • defcon 4

            “tribal law” being islamic law right?

          • A Z

            Tribal law is not quite Islamic law.

            By having tribal law the Pashtun set themselves up for jihad by another holier than thou Muslim group once all the other infidels are gone.

            I do not know the exact difference, but I bet they can be found.

          • Drakken

            Killem all and let allah sortem out, that is how you deal with these savages, period.

          • defcon 4

            Do you really think, the muslimes who run the Taliban and/or Pakistain don’t refer to Sharia law at least some of the time and all of the time for important things, like blasphemy and heresy?

          • A Z

            Yes, they refer to Sharia.

            Yet there has to be some differences between Pasthun tribal law and Arab tribal law.

          • Drakken

            It is still tribal and no nation building is stupidity on steroids, every effing muslime nation is a cesspool.

          • TienBing

            Pockets of semi-Western European style civility do not equal a modern civilization. Had we completely defeated Afghanistan as a nation and a people, and destroyed their infrastructure; had they admitted defeat and begged for mercy; if we had any common cultural grounds to meet on; if the land could be isolated from other influences – then maybe it would have been possible to “rebuild” them and a case might have been made to do such. As it was “nation building” should never have been attempted.

            Afghanistan has been “ungoverned” and or “badly governed space” since before recorded history. It is not our business or to our interest to decide how it should be governed and who should govern it. Stressing over the fact that it was poorly governed should not be a consideration. Our only interest was the “Grand Game” – keeping Russia out. The only group in history who were able to “govern” Afghanistan were the Mongols. We don’t have the intestinal fortitude to rule as the Mongols.

            The only bad consequence to ignoring Afghanistan was because of our unwillingness to do what was necessary when they forcibly brought their presence to our attention. If the choice was between the lives of Americans or the lives of Afghans, we should have made it very clear to the Afghans that they would lose the lives – not Americans. They were for all intents and purposes a bandit nation – why should we care about extradition laws? They pay the price until they submit, or they stay out of everyone’s space.

          • A Z

            “Pockets of semi-Western European style civility do not equal a modern civilization”

            I’ll agree to that.

            But look at the pictures of women in Egypt and Afghanistan in the 1950s and 1960s Not all dressed western, but you could see what ethos was ascendant. Now we have burkas.

          • TienBing

            Fads and fashion change with regimes. If they don’t like the burkas they shouldn’t wear them. We are not responsible for their sartorial preferences or justifications for same. Our only concern is that they don’t try to intimidate or otherwise impose their concerns on us.

            They only need to know, and we only need to demonstrate, that if they bring any discomfort, irritation, or actual harm to us it will end up hurting them far more than anything they do or cause to be done to us. A graphic demonstration may be necessary to impress them with our ability and convince them of our sincerity – but once done would save a lot of time, money, and lives.

            Think of all the lives, American and Afghan, that would have been saved had Bill Clinton visited massive destruction Kabul, when the Taliban refused to hand over bin Laden. Afghans would have discovered a fatwa somewhere that said hiding murderous whackjobs from Americans is not covered under obligations of hospitality.

          • A Z

            “Afghanistan has been “ungoverned” and or “badly governed space” since before recorded history.”

            I don’t know that Greco-Bactria was more poorly governed on average than the rest of the world at the time.

          • TienBing

            To pass the time we could quibble about which of the “badly governed” eras was worst or better, but that was not the point.
            As far as the Greco-Bactria era – they did basically what I advocate: they did what they wanted with the territory or routes they needed and as long as the locals stayed out of the way all was good. If the locals caused problems they were punished severely without mercy or apology.
            They did not not attempt to “govern” the whole territory or give a fig for the local’s feelings or customs.

          • TienBing

            Somehow I managed to post this reply to your post in the general discussion – sorry.
            To pass the time we could quibble about which of the “badly governed” eras was worst or better, but that was not the point.
            As far as the Greco-Bactria era – they did basically what I advocate: they did what they wanted with the territory or routes they needed and as long as the locals stayed out of the way all was good. If the locals caused problems they were punished severely without mercy or apology.
            They did not not attempt to “govern” the whole territory or give a fig for the local’s feelings or customs.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            What do Germans have in common with Muslims? Not a damn thing!

          • defcon 4

            Not all Germans were Naz!s, but all muslimes are fascists because islam is a fascist theology.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            You are arguing that nation building is wrong. It is a point worth arguing. Yet we did nation build in Germany and Japan.

            Exactly like a very typical Republican and Dhimmicrat as well, you adhere to the tenets of political correct multiculturalism. Thus, since we did nation building in Germany and Japan, you believe we must also do nation-building in Islamic countries as well, even though every fricking Muslim in the world whether you know it or not is our eternal mortal enemy.

            Indeed, as long as you guys adhere to the tenets of political correctness and multiculturalism, which, by the way is a very destructive form of Cultural Communism, you guys will never be able to see the light and will be destined to repeat the same stupid idiotic mistakes over and over again.

            The Republican Party of today is almost as leftwing as the Dhimmicrat Party of today and just as incompetent when it comes to foreign policy. Indeed, this sort of insanity is one of the reasons I left the Republican Party and never looked back.

            Yet arguing against nation building then one has to come up with a solution about what to do about ungoverned space

            Dude…you are utterly clueless. I bet you even believe we should democratize them. More than 12 years have passed since the 9/11 jihad attacks and you are still as oblivious as the day it happened. That’s amazing!

            Critics feel no need because they say it is not a pressing issue therefore they do not feel compelled to offer a comprehensive solution but only to nit pick.

            Comprehensive solution? Yeah right.

          • Raymond_in_DC

            Germany and Japan surrendered and acknowledged their defeat. The ideology that drove them to war was discredited. So it was possible to rebuild those nations on new principles.

            But Islam doesn’t surrender or accept defeat, and its followers never blame Islam as the cause of their failure. They simply retreat or retrench and prepare to fight another day. And sometimes it’s outside players that “save” them from that defeat, as in the case of the Arab-Israeli wars where, as I’ve said for years, Israel is never allowed to win and the Arabs are never allowed to lose.

          • A Z

            “Germany and Japan surrendered and acknowledged their defeat. The ideology that drove them to war was discredited. So it was possible to rebuild those nations on new principles.”

            I’ll agree to that.

            Germans had a name for defeat. They called it “Zero Hour” They started speaking about it before the fall of Berlin. I’m not sure about how long before.

            Stunde Null specifically refers to the capitulation of the Nazi government on May 8, 1945, at midnight, marking the end of World War II in Germany.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stunde_Null

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I never said the Afghanis were our enemies.

            But they are and you would know this already if not for your unhinged adherence to the tenets of political correct multiculturalism.

          • Drakken

            Do not compare a muslim dominated sub society with a western civilized society, for there is no comparison. Nation building in a muslim nation is complete utter folly and stupidity. Go in, and destroy everything and call it a day where a muslim nation is concerned, and if they have natural resources, take them as a form of reparations. Destroy every mosque and hang every imam and ayatollah with a pigs foot shoved in their mouth. You impose your will on them at the point of the sword. No mercy and no quarter period. That is how you deal with muslim dominated regions. Anything that has to do with kindness or mercy is weakness and the muslims will kill you for it. So effem.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I never said the Afghanis were our enemies.

            Are the Afghanis adherents of Islam? I believe they are. Thus, how are they not our eternal mortal enemy since the sole fundamental purpose of Islam is the subjugation of all religions and all infidels into Islamic totalitarianism through both violent and non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad (holy war) and the eventual imposition of Sharia (Islamic totalitarian law) to make Islam supreme throughout the world?

      • pennant8

        I would concede that the Taliban is our enemy in the sense that all other Islamic groups such as Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbillah, Al Nusra front and all the rest are our enemy. The Taliban might have played a role in protecting OBL but they couldn’t do it without the acquiescence of the Afghan government. The Pakistan government protected OBL as well. The even set him up in a compound down the street from their military academy.
        We need to stop squandering the lives of our troops chasing after barely literate Taliban goat herders in the hills of Afghanistan and go after the Islamic enemy within. The Islamic enemy in business suits, aka the Muslim Brotherhood, which has infiltrated into just about every key element of our defense and security estblishments, were part of the network supporting the 9/11 hijackers, and enjoy being regularly feted at the White House.

        • Drakken

          Every effing muslim is our enemy and your not going to tame them, you must put them under your boot otherwise they will be at your throat.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Not only just the Taliban and AQ dude, but every Muslim in the world is our eternal mortal enemy, as all of them and every last one of them, are jihadists in one form or another, either violent jihadists as in the Taliban and AQ or otherwise stealth and deceptive jihadists, as in Bush appointed Ambassador to Afghanistan and Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad. All Muslims are our eternal mortal enemy, otherwise they are not Muslims. To help Muslims is to help our enemies.

        • ObamaYoMoma

          Why is every last Muslim our enemy? It’s because Islam is not a religion, but a form of totalitarianism that masquerades as being a religion, not only to dupe Muslims, but also to dupe gullible useful idiot infidels. Thus, since the freedom of conscience is strictly controlled in Islam via the penalty of death for blasphemy and apostasy, all Muslims are our eternal mortal enemy or otherwise they are blasphemous apostates in which case, according to the texts and tenets of Islam, they must be executed. It isn’t any more complicated than that.

    • Veracious_one

      The Taliban is the enemy of the Afghan people who prefer living under the generic brand of sharia instead of the industrial strength brand even though they don’t seem all that committed to ridding themselves of the enforces of the industrial strength brand.

      there is no generic brand of Shar’ia law…

      • pennant8

        True enough. However, most Islamic countries do not enforce sharia to the letter of the law. My term “generic sharia” is just my way of describing their somewhat moderate interpretations.

        • defcon 4

          “most islamic countries do not enforce sharia to the letter of the law” try criticising the child molesting, Jew hating, psychopathic prophet of islam, in public, in any islam0nazi pigsty and see what happens to you.

          • pennant8

            i get it. Blasphemy is a real sore spot in the Islamic world. Nevertheless, the only reason why groups like the Taliban and Boko Harem spring up is because they percieve their governments as not being sufficiently compliant with sharia. And speaking of blasphemy. Our own Secretary of State Hillary Clinton actually had discussions with the OIC [Organization of the Islamic Cooperation] on how we might be able to water down our 1st Amendment to make it more aggreeable with sharia laws against blasphemy. The OIC disguises this stealth jihad attack by portraying themselves as being very concerned about disrespect to all religions.

          • dusel1

            Islam is not a religion; it is a political agenda, bent on killing all who do not agree with the rules.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Islam not only dupes most infidels into believing it is a religion, but also dupes all Muslims as well into believing it is a religion, but in faith-based religions people have the right to believe or not to believe. In Islam, on the other hand, the first and foremost prerequisite is the total, complete, and unconditional submission to the “will of Allah” under the penalty of death for blasphemy and apostasy. Thus, there is no freedom of conscience allowed in Islam. No individual right to choose to believe or not to believe. Indeed, once a Muslim, always a Muslim, otherwise, it is death. There is no middle ground or fence sitting allowed. Therefore, Islam in reality is actually a form of very strict totalitarianism that is masquerading as being a religion. Nevertheless, Islam is no more a religion than the man in the moon and should widely be denounced for the fraud it actually is. Of course, Muslims that have been brought up and raised in Islam have no understanding or concept of what the freedom of conscience actually is.

      • Veracious_one

        “It is amazing that the whole audience doesn’t erupt into laughter when that infamous clown, the Islamic supremacist Reza Aslan, emits these howlers. Sharia in reality is marked by a remarkable uniformity: the four Sunni madhahib agree on about 75% of all rulings. Whenever and wherever we see Sharia implemented, it looks essentially the same. Changes and variations come in when Sharia provisions are relaxed or dropped altogether, as in secular Turkey — but that is not some different version of Sharia, it is no Sharia at all.”

        “Mali Islamic supremacists move to ban music, just as they have in Afghanistan and elsewhere. Mali and Afghanistan are separated by immense distance and differences of language and culture. But Sharia in both is markedly similar.”

        • Veracious_one

          It is amazing that the whole audience doesn’t erupt into laughter when that infamous clown, the Islamic supremacist Reza Aslan, emits these howlers. Sharia in reality is marked by a remarkable uniformity: the four Sunni madhahib agree on about 75% of all rulings. Whenever and wherever we see Sharia implemented, it looks essentially the same. Changes and variations come in when Sharia provisions are relaxed or dropped altogether, as in secular Turkey — but that is not some different version of Sharia, it is no Sharia at all.

          Mali Islamic supremacists move to ban music, just as they have in Afghanistan and elsewhere. Mali and Afghanistan are separated by immense distance and differences of language and culture. But Sharia in both is markedly similar.

    • Drakken

      Do not kid yourself nor blind yourself into the self delusion that it is only so called “extremist muslims” and not the so called “peaceful muslims” It is all muslims who are our enemy period. Ask yourself this very pertinent question, wherever there is islam, is there peace? Name a country anywhere in the world where islam is dominant, that there is peaceful coexistence with anyone else not of the Islamic pestilence presence?
      Where ever islam goes, the blood always flows, without exception.

      • pennant8

        I agree with you. My concern is that we continue to flounder along with no real understanding of what we are up against. This is why after 12 years we are practically begging Afghanistan to allow us to remain past 2014 when more American lives will be squandered in return for virtually no added protection from Islamic jihad. This is why we actually gave serious thought to going into Syria on the side of jihadists we rebranded as freedom fighters, and for all I know we are probably aiding them under the radar anyway.
        To illustrate this, put two photos side by side. One photo of our troops patrolling along some godforsaken road in Afghanistan waiting to be shredded by an IED or shot in the back by an Afghan Army soldier. Next to that photo put a photo of Muslim Brotherhood bigwigs yukking it up at the annual Whiite House iftar dinner, and ask yourself whats wrong with these pictures?

        • Drakken

          What is wrong with that picture you ask? Islam period. We are well on our way to a Balkans on steroids, and it is not years or decades in coming, but upon us soon. As far as I am concerned, the only good muslim is a dead muslim.

  • Smoking Hamster

    I would believe it. Remember that Biden said, “The Taliban per-se is not our enemy.”

  • Fritz Kohlhaas

    Obama has, as all traitors, no shame, no honour, no conscience.

    • defcon 4

      From the zero’s perspective, all of us who oppose islam0nazism as well as the zero’s policies are the traitors, we’re the enemies of his state.

    • Lynn Rivera

      yep.

  • BayouCoyote

    I’m done w baQuacks like a duck.
    With that quacking headline, it has officially become “Domestic” enemy #1.

    • pacific waters

      You may be done with him but he isn’t done with us.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Of course, if we understood that the Islamic world was waging a worldwide jihad (holy war) both violently and non-violently via stealth and deception against all religions and all infidels in the world simultaneously to ultimately make Islam supreme as opposed to a few Muslim extremist groups here and there that are perpetrating terrorism because of the infidel’s imperialist foreign policies or whatever, then we would also know and understand that all Muslims, including Karsai, former Bush appointed American Ambassador Zalmay Khalilzad, the Afghanis, the Taliban, and AQ in this case are all indeed our perpetual eternal enemies. Especially when you consider the fact that uniform wearing Afghani troops were the culprits that murdered many American troops, although the clueless media tried to blame it on Taliban infiltration.

    Until the government of the USA and most journalists, including this one, dump their unhinged allegiance to multiculturalism, which morally equates Islamic culture with our own culture and blocks them from viewing the nature of the problem sanely, this idiotic insanity unfortunately will continue unhindered and clueless journalists, including this one, will continue blaming it on Muslim extremist terrorism, even though every Muslim in the world is a jihadists in one form or another and also our eternal mortal enemy. Indeed, even the ones currently infiltrating America in mass today.

    Think about it, ever since shortly after the 9/11 violent jihad attacks we have been propping up a country and a people that are for all intents and purposes our perpetual eternal mortal enemies and also the enemies of all infidels. Both major political parties in America are responsible for this madness. Does it get any more incompetent and insane than that?

    • defcon 4

      At least there are Republicans trying to do something about it (Frank Gaffney is one, I’m sure there are others). There are Republicans resisting islam0nazism — while no one in the Democraptic party does anything except praise and collaborate w/islam0nazism.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Okay, because a tiny minority of Republicans is trying to do something as opposed to the vast overwhelming majority that don’t have the first clue, I should not chastise the Republican Party for their unhinged adherence to PC multiculturalism just like Dhimmicrats? Yeah right.

        • defcon 4

          Have ANY democraptic leaders ever even mildly criticised islam?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            What does that have to do with the official position of the Republican Party? I never was a Dhimmicrat. However, I used to be a Republican until I wised up and realized that it is just a hair to the right of the totally Marxist Dhimmicrat Party. Indeed, for this country to have a chance, the Republican Party must be replaced with a modern conservative party, but so many leftists are calling themselves conservatives, that the average voter has become confused.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Name one elected Republican member of Congress that publicly denounces Islam for what it really is and at the same time calls for outlawing, banning, and reversing mass Muslim immigration because it is really stealth and deceptive jihad for the strategic purpose of demographic conquest.

          • defcon 4

            Allen West has publicly criticised Islam, of course, he’s not in office anymore.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Like you said, he isn’t in office anymore and in any event he was always very limited in his denunciations. In fact, exactly like a strict adherent of multiculturalism he was always very careful to couch his limited denunciations of Islam in terms of radical Islam. That would be okay except for the fact that there is only one Islam, as the existence of radical Islam, exactly like the existence of moderate Islam is the fantasy based creation of the multicultural left, as it doesn’t exist. By the way, I never heard Mr. West call for outlawing, banning, and reversing mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage on the grounds that it is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad for the strategic purpose of demographic conquest. Have you?

    • A Z

      “Until the government of the USA and most journalists, including this one”

      That is a false statement and you know it.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        That is a false statement and you know it.

        If Republicans like Dhimmicrats and most journalists as well don’t adhere to the tenets of leftwing multiculturalism as you ridiculously claim above, then please explain why Muslims are being allowed to migrate to America in mass, as they are also migrating in mass throughout most of Western Europe as well?

        Indeed, you multicultural moonbats all morally equate Islamic society with Western society in strict adherence to the tenets multiculturalism, and it is multiculturalism that makes it impossible for you moonbats to see who your enemies actually are and even to see reality, for that matter. As a matter fact, in you guy’s very corrupted minds, what is jihad (holy war), if it is violent, is merely terrorism perpetrated by a few stray Muslim extremists, as terrorism perpetrated by a tiny minority of extremists is far less substantial a problem relative to war, which is what jihad really is. Thus, in one fell swoop and through the miracles of PC multiculturalism, what is actually a war has been effectively minimized and reduced to mere terrorism perpetrated by only a few misguided extremists. Meanwhile, at the same time we are letting the enemy infiltrate us in mass.

        By the way, when is this particular journalist not relegating Islamic violence to Muslim terrorism, while ignoring non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad as the same time?

        Nonetheless, I bet you believe I’m unhinged and very paranoid at the same time. Meanwhile, I know you are, maybe not paranoid, but very unhinged to say the least thanks to PC multiculturalism.

      • pacific waters

        You have to be kidding.

        • A Z

          I was not kidding. It was a false statement on face of it.
          Dan Greenfield is not a multi-culturalist. therefore the statement is false. If ObamaYoMoma (OY) made a broad sweeping generalization and those are usually wrong. If he had said something 90% of journalists are multi-culturalists it would not be so obvious that it was wrong. It would be debatable

          If he had said something 90% of liberal journalists are multi-culturalists it might be considered true given people’s observations

          “Until the government of the USA and most journalists,

          ****including this one, *****
          dump their unhinged allegiance to multiculturalism, which morally equates Islamic culture with our own culture and blocks them from viewing the nature of the problem sanely”

          • Daniel Greenfield

            I’m in fine company with the Counterjihadists this troll hates including Robert Spencer and Ryan Mauro

            I don’t think there’s anyone here who writes about Islam whom he doesn’t attack

          • A Z

            Within the last 3 months you called OY out on pretending to like many of the counter-jihadists and readers or agree with them only to later in his comments to twist things

            I called him out one one particular statement that was patently untrue to keep it simple and to prove a point.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            I did. Probably a waste of time. OY was falsely attributing quotes to me.

            But that’s what trolls do.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Actually, those accusations were proven to be incorrect.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            How were they proven incorrect?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            You can’t read?

          • Daniel Greenfield

            So no proof then.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Actually, I admire Robert Spencer, but I detest Ryan Mauro. I would admire you too if you wouldn’t reduce what is actually jihad waged by the Islamic world against all religions and all infidels to only a minuscule problem involving terrorism and a few stray misguided Muslim extremists here and there. After all, a war is a far greater dilemma than just a few terrorists attacks perpetrated here and there by Muslim extremists.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            That’s not what I do. But being a lying troll you know that already.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            That’s not what I do.

            Okay…let’s see you put your money where your mouth is.

            But being a lying troll you know that already.

            Accusations of lying are not proof of anything and anyone can make accusations. Indeed, for instance, you are a liar and a troll.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            What are you dense? It’s not false, there are tons of people out there that deny their own adherence to the tenets of political correct multiculturalism, but nonetheless action speaks louder than words. Does Greenfield repeatedly reduce and minimize what is really jihad (a holy war) to being a much smaller issue involving Muslim terrorism perpetrated by a tiny minority of extremists exactly like all political correct multicultural elitists? Unequivocally! If he doesn’t, then he isn’t making himself very clear.

        • A Z

          ObamaYoMoma (OY) comes here as someone not all there, a plant or someone that just wants to tear things up. I usually pass over his comments. They are usually long and useless.

          Greenfield called OY out for his forever antagonistic comments in the last 3 months.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Aziz,

            What does antagonism have to do with OYM’s accurate descriptions of Islam? And how can a journalist be liberal and multicultural at the same time? Multiculturalists want to impose their Tower of Babel bullshit on the dissenting majority.

            At least 90% of journals are multicultural leftists. Unless you can pull a figure out of your @ss that is more accurate.

          • A Z

            I thought it was 85% of journalists that described themselves left of center. That statistic is about 10 or 15 years old.

            85% or 90% does not make much of a difference when they have had a generation or two to skew news stories over time shaping public opinion.

            http://archive.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics.asp

            http://www.mrc.org/biasalerts/speech-gift-confronting-race-w-honesty-3192008#4

            OY described Greenfield as a multiculturalist/liberal.
            I called him out on that. It was an untrue statement.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            You may have tried to call me out, but you have yet to prove it is a false statement. Saying it is false and proving it to be false are two different things I’m afraid. Are you delusional and how are you still so ignorant about Islam and Muslims after all these many years since 9/11? Are you not curious?

          • A Z

            I mentioned it was a false statement in a public post. Most readers can see that that particular statement was false “by inspection”. That is is a term used in mathematical/philosophy proofs. Anyone who has taken one of those subject I have no fear will see it the way I did.

            I have no need to further spar with you. The damage is done.

            Have fun keep safe & above all keep trolling …

            I know you will :)

          • Daniel Greenfield

            “Until the government of the USA and most journalists, including this
            one, dump their unhinged allegiance to multiculturalism, which morally
            equates Islamic culture with our own culture”

            Do you feel that’s a fair description by OYM of my work?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I don’t know if you noticed, but I also have called Greenfield out for his numerous misrepresentations as well, but that’s neither here nor there. By the way, why don’t you answer my posts? Oh yeah, you can’t without revealing at the same time that you are more than just a little mentally deficient. Apparently, you don’t like being exposed a fool. Oh well that’s too bad.

      • Northstar

        ObamaYoMoma like Obama doesn’t know when he’s lying

        • ObamaYoMoma

          Hey Western Canadian, how you been doing. Watched any good movies lately?

  • Socialism: Organized Evil

    Hussein Obama is totally delusional. Here’s another typical example: http://youtu.be/oQNkVmdicvA?t=17s

  • Gee

    Well if the Israeli government can consider Fatah to be a ‘peace partner’ the president of the United States can be just as stupid

    • jzabner

      I fail to grasp your point. The US and EU have, at least since the Madrid conference, forced Israel to consider Fatah as a “peace partner”. Who is forcing this administration to treat the Taliban or Iran as benign?

      • Gee

        Our government has continued the stupidity for decades now. Proving that our leaders are just as stupid as the American leaders

        • defcon 4

          Maybe just as stupid, but not half as corrupt!

          • Gee

            You optimist! Oh yes our politicians are just as corrupt as yours.

            Try looking up “the stinking maneuver” and “Peres”

  • ziggy zoggy

    The problem with Obama is that no Islamic group or country is America’s enemy.

    Even his publicized drone strikes against al qaeda “insurgents” are selective and inconsistent. None of the various reasons given for the strikes explain why far worse terrorists with known locations are ignored and some minor terrorists are not.

    You’d almost think he’s setting a precedent for drone strikes and other extra-judicial killings here in America. Next thing you know, he will offer the taliban sanctuary in America.

  • momtothreebeagles

    I swear, the Fresh Prince of Bill Ayers is mentally ill.

  • Lynn Rivera

    Not our enemy? Maybe not his enemy– but then he is not American.

  • lou hodges

    Obama missed the whole 11th grade History class. I guess he thinks this is the first time in history that dictators have assumed power and lied to the people. He doesn’t know its a formula. You lie until the people find out, then you run when they finally overpower you. Get on that bicycle baby.

    • defcon 4

      No he didn’t, he paid keen attention to his madrassa studies in isalm0fascist Indonesia

  • dusel1

    Of course, Muzslime raghead Obama and those who think like him are not the enemy of the Taliban, but the USA is one of the Taliban’s many enemies.

  • obamasucksreggielovesballs

    Super-Asshole Obama strikes again!

  • disqus_7ayGJSNXFl

    Of course Obama does not consider them enemies, because he is one of them. Oboma should be arrested and trialed for treason. He makes America look weak. If he loves them so much he should moved out of here and join them on their homeland.

  • markkrite

    Just another reason to IMPEACH the traitorous b……d sitting in the W.H. He doesn’t really care what we Americans think, he’s just reverting to the feral totalitarian that is in reality Obama. We don’t need incipient dictators masquerading as Presidents, so let’s us do what the Constitution provides, for our safety, and just insist that the House do it’s duty; launch letters of impeachment against this fraudulent buffoon Obama. He MUST go! And by now he’s fulfilled every one of the standards for impeachment, TREASON, BRIBERY, HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS, and he’s done them all in spades. Next stop after letters of impeachment are issued: Obama in chains before the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, for his trial for his many offenses against we the people. Let the trial begin!

  • Rachel

    What is it with this idiot? He changes laws, rules and definitions as it suits him! Well, Barry…you may not want to fight them, but they ARE our enemies. And so are YOU.

  • JohnDevries

    I cannot believe the situation Obama has put the world in. No one is sure of who the enemy is now. We have them living among us, we are fighting with them, they continue to kill our troops, Obama acts more like a muslim than any muslim I know and there seems to be absolutely no sense of direction at all now.
    Islam is flooding the world for reason no one knows or understands but most know that it is going to lead to a very nasty situation. In Norway, muslims are the primary rapist in the country and two days ago a Norwegian woman was buggared to death in the street, with the police having to pull the assailant off her. He claimed it was with consent because she had stopped screaming!
    Muslims parade in all European countries demanding special treatment and carrying signs which are grossly offensive to the host country. How long do government consider this is going to go on before the people start to remove the problem themselves.
    It is said the new world order intends to reduce the population by 90 per cent. Perhaps this is how they intend to do it. Pack every country of the world with Muslims and wait for them to be killed.
    For whatever reason, we are being deceived. To even touch on the subject of Islam brings a tsunami of racist accusations from those whose I.Q. does not exceed their glove size.
    One thing is for sure and this is by now we should be fighting but the question is who and what the hell do we fight.

  • Jakareh

    The domestic enemy saying the foreign enemy is not an enemy.

    • Bill Adkins

      The Tea Party is the domestic enemy.

      • The Guardian

        You are correct sir. The Tea Party is the domestic enemy of the Leftist totalitarians and the elite slave masters that you worship, and we will continue to fight for freedom and liberty and for the future of America.

      • ziggy zoggy

        Bildo Adkins,

        If the Tea Party is your enemy then you are an enemy of the Constitution, which is the “law of the land,” as you twats are so fond of saying. If you prefer socialist dictators, I suggest you move to utopian Cuba or North Korea.

        • Bill Adkins

          Your version of the constitution is quite active in the Somalian Confederacy. You should go. The Tea Party is truly ignorance become a political movement and very appropriately referenced as ‘snookism.’ It promises only Idiocracy

          • ziggy zoggy

            Bildo,

            There are no different versions of the US Constitution and if you think the Tea Party is an ignorant movement you are even stupider than your last comment proved. Promoting morons like Obama is what can march all the morons to an idiocracy.

          • Bill Adkins

            No, there are perversions of the Constitution – and that’s exactly what you are – a purveyor of perversion, the type that says, “I don’t care if the Supreme Court says it’s constitutional, that doesn’t mean it’s constitutional.” Idiocracy is a consequence of tea parties.

          • Drakken

            Let me guess? You voted for Comrade Obummer didn’t you? Go figure that a good little progressive/commi like you would vote for Amerikas demise.

          • Bill Adkins

            If I were voting for America’s demise I’d vote for a Tea Party Republican. Go figure you’re a good little lemming/idiot who actually does vote that way.

          • johnnydelgado

            You qualify to win the “Title of the dumbest”.

          • Drakken

            The Tea Party believes in the Costitution, libidiots like you want to destroy it, sorry, but you folks on the left will open Pandora’s Little Box of Horrors. Let it rain !

          • Softly Bob

            Some people are proud of their stupidity and will flaunt it on any website. You are one of them.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        The Tea Party is the domestic enemy.

        Why…because the Tea Party supports adherence to the constitution, promotes smaller and less government and also that we live within our means, and advocates capitalism as opposed to Socialism. Indeed, those things along with our military might are what initially made America the greatest state the world has ever seen. Apparently, like Obama, you hate the constitution, while at the same time you worship at the altar of big bloated government, and aspire to transform America into a Marxist/Socialist state in the same vein as Cuba, Venezuela, and North Korea because you abhor capitalism and believe it is evil. In fact, you are an economic basket case, don’t have a clue how capitalism works, could care less about national defense, and are incredibly delusional. Instead, you feel a sense of entitlement like you are owed something, that healthcare is a right instead of a privilege, and that the government should confiscate the earned wealth of the rich to redistribute it to unhinged mentally incompetent morons like you. In fact, you also believe the government should order and control our lives because the majority of people like you aren’t intelligent enough to fend for themselves. Indeed, your greatest ambition in life is to live off of welfare benefits and food stamps while the government provides for your illegitimate children and takes care of their health care for you.

  • David

    Hard to believe the ignorance and fear spilled all over this page. In case you haven’t studied religions (obviously no one here has), the Muslim faith is closer to Christianity than Judaism.

    I have fought in Vietnam and in Lebanon (for Israel) and I have had to take many lives, but I can tell you one thing for sure: no man is my enemy unless I make him one.

    The only enemies of America are the ones we have made. If our foreign policies were win/win we’d have no enemies.

    • Truthseeker

      David, it is astonishing how practically nothing you said above is true or coyl be substantiated by facts and history. You, sir, have achieved a level of self-brainwashing that I have never seen the likes of anywhere. The philosophy of the greatest enemy of our country was formed over a thousand years before our country came into being, and it will remain so (by their own declaration) until it is eradicated from this earth. Peace will never come as long as barbarism is tolerated or, worse yet, enabled by the progressives.

    • batmanroxus

      Shut up idiot. The Marines were instituted to fight muslims… and leftist fools like you.

    • ziggy zoggy

      Daud,

      Islam is closer the Manson Family cult than Christianity, your military claims don’t make you less deranged, and America doesn’t have enemies because we provoke them – especially the islamopithecines we’ve been fighting for and enriching for about 100 years.

    • defcon 4

      LOL, then try walking through Beirut, Mogadishu, Islamabad, Karachi, Baghdad, Ankara, Istanbul, Tehran, Damascus, Riyadh, Mecca, Medina, Mogadishu w/a a kippah on. After all, no one would be your enemy there, because they don’t know you right?

    • ObamaYoMoma

      Hard to believe the ignorance and fear spilled all over this page. In case you haven’t studied religions (obviously no one here has), the Muslim faith is closer to Christianity than Judaism.

      Tell us since you represent yourself as an expert in theology while the rest of the posters here are mere neophytes next to you, what exactly in your mind makes Islam a religion? Please explain that for us so we can all learn from your infinite wisdom.

      Is it the total, complete, and unconditional submission to the “will of Allah” under the penalty of death for blasphemy and apostasy that Islam requires as the first and foremost prerequisite of all adherents that makes Islam a religion? Or is it the penalty of death for non-conformance, i.e., blasphemy and apostasy, with the texts and tenets of Islam that makes Islam a religion? How about the fact that waging jihad, which is holy war in the cause of Allah to ultimately make Islam supreme throughout the world, is a holy obligation incumbent upon all Muslims in one form or another, is that what makes Islam a religion?

      Indeed, what exactly according to you, a bona fide expert in theology no less, makes Islam a religion on a par with other true faith based religions according to you? Does Islam allow adherents the freedom of choice to believe or not to believe as in true faith-based religions, and if it does or doesn’t, does that still make Islam a religion? Please explain, because I was under the impression, apparently mistaken according to you, that Islam is really a very rabid form of totalitarianism masquerading as being a religion, not only to dupe its adherents who have no clue about religion, but to also dupe the gullible useful idiot infidels it intends to subjugate into Islamic totalitarianism through jihad and the eventual imposition of Sharia.

      I have fought in Vietnam and in Lebanon (for Israel) and I have had to take many lives, but I can tell you one thing for sure: no man is my enemy unless I make him one.

      Yeah…we know, you’re a legend in your own mind! And that somehow would make you infinitely qualified, a leading authority, and next to Obama, one of the smartest men in the world.

      The only enemies of America are the ones we have made. If our foreign policies were win/win we’d have no enemies.

      In other words, the Islamic world isn’t waging a jihad (holy war) to subjugate all religions and all infidels into Islamic totalitarianism through both violent and non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad and the eventual imposition of Sharia (Islamic totalitarian law) to ultimately make Islam supreme throughout the world, because it is a true faith-based religion very similar to Christianity and Judaism according to you, a bona fide expert in theology. Instead, Muslims perpetrate terrorism around the world only in response to America’s exploitative and imperialist foreign policies, or in the case of Ron Paul kooks, only in response to America’s “interventionist” foreign policies, or in the case of Israel, only in response to Israeli settlements and harsh Israeli policies. Not only that, but Muslims are migrating in mass throughout the infidel world with only good intentions and because they want to become good friends and good neighbors. Meanwhile, Muslims always treat non-Muslim infidels that happen to also live in the Islamic world only with the utmost respect and deepest admiration.

      Finally, Barack Hussein Obama is the smartest and most honest man in history and we will all be better off because of Obamacare and his limitless intelligence.

      • David

        If you can’t answer a man’s arguments, all is not lost; you can still engage in passive/aggressive attacks.

        You don’t want answers; you want blood. Problem is, you’re too much the coward to go after it yourself. السلام عليكم

        • defcon 4

          Gee, which religion is responsible for the most bloodshed in the 21st century? Lying allahtard.

          • David

            Christianity, ignoranus.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            What a moronic moonbat! Where, when?

        • ObamaYoMoma

          How so very typical! In other words, according to you, all right-wingers are warmongers. Where have we seen that stupidity ad nauseum before? Get lost you unhinged mentally incompetent moonbat.

    • Drakken

      Our enemies of the West are from the muslim east. That makes it every muslim no matter the stripe our enemy.

  • Tuco

    Not to defend Obama by any stretch, but FrontPage Mag did its own
    credibility a huge disservice by publishing an article with the headline
    that screams: “Obama: “The Taliban are Not Our Enemies and We Don’t
    Want to Fight Them” and then revealing by second-hand anecdote that
    Karzai attributed the statement to a national security adviser by the
    name of Tom Donilon. That’s the sleight of hand BS the left pulls to
    sell an emotion and not fitting for FrontPage Mag. There’s plenty of
    petards on which to hoist Obama without contriving unsubstantiated
    innuendos. Stick to the high ground, FrontPage Mag.

    • defcon 4

      Prove your allegation, because I see nothing in the article to support your statement.

      • Tuco

        The “proof” of my statement is the article itself. Headline screams
        “OBAMA…” (said such-and-such) and the article itself reveals that it
        was: 1) stated by Karzai (a third party = anecdotal) that: 2) a national
        security adviser, Tom Donilon (a name that is NOT synonymous with
        Barack Hussein Obama) who made the statement. So, there’s my “proof”
        that the body of the article does not fulfill the “bait” of the
        headline. Now, since we’re in a “show your proof” mode, how ’bout you
        prove that you actually even read the article. Or is it rude to require
        factual stuff of trolls?

        • defcon 4

          Actually you’re right. Nevertheless, the National Security Adviser serves at the pleasure of the zero. Therefore he works for the zero. Has the zero ever repudiated his subordinate’s position?

          • Tuco

            I hereby retract my “troll” barb, with apologies. Two conservatives at crossed purposes. I doubt that Obama would have repudiated that adviser’s statement as I personally believe that the adviser is on the same wavelength with his master. My only quibble is with FrontPage Mag putting its credibility in jeopardy by throwing out a misleading (bait) headline like that — only to discover that no such thing actually happened (yet). And for that matter, that suggests believability should be attributed to Karzai. No thanks. In a sea of journalistic BS, I’d like to trust that FPM will always take the high road and not stoop to libtard/progressive tactics like using bait-and-switch headlines. To me, that smacks of a carnival barker’s tactic and not class journalism.

          • Phil Gwinn

            Glad to see you man-up defcon 4. But, your question remains:

            Has the zero ever repudiated his subordinate’s position?

            A better question would be: Has the zero been proven to even know his subordinates position? Our current President has a penchant for not being informed. In the Marines we stopped taking the “Private didn’t know” excuse about the time they make PFC. That is to say about six months in.

            It’s too damn bad that the american electorate accepts that nonsense from the ultimate “leader” of our military.

      • Phil Gwinn

        Defcon4 are you really that slow? I don’t believe it for a minute. I mean you can read, you can type, you have internet access.

        Surely you understand Tuco’s words:

        “…then revealing by second-hand anecdote that Karzai attributed the statement to a national security adviser by the name of Tom Donilon.”

        Your post was a mistake right? You were reading someone elses post and due to multiple tabs you typed your response on the wrong page? Happens all the time…

  • Chuck Weaver

    put this on the list of impeachable actions. If this is true it is the most disgusting of his treasonous activities. Impeachment procedures should start should strat Monday.

  • AWAKEN

    WAKE UP AMERICANS!

    OBAMA praise Islamic History and says the Muslims Brotherhood , Talibans, Hamas, other terrorists are their friends who have great plan to Jihad and Islamize America then who are his enemies ? YOU who are American Non-Muslims are his enemies, KAFIRS to be subjugated soon as DHIMMIS!

  • Bobbi Santorumforprez Swingle

    that is ok he is not our friend either!!!! Obama the worst trustworthy person in the world

  • Kimberly Elliott

    YOU BETTER REMEMBER 9 11 AND TELL ME WHO YOUR ENEMIES ARE….

  • Kimberly Elliott

    TRAITORS WILL BE UP AND DROPPED OFF. SOMEWHERE….

  • joshuasweet

    just like the Muslim Brotherhood is not our enemy

  • David Hersch

    Did George Orwell write this Obama script? Certainly sounds like it.

  • nood2

    He who blesses them, will be blessed, and he who curses them will be cursed.
    Stop turning your back on Israel and God will again look at the US in favour.

  • lolman

    a shameless attempt to slander Obama. Ohh fine, he’s a dick, but this is not evidence fora nything

  • billobillo54

    George Bush saying: “Islam is a religion of peace” is just as damaging, betraying and destructive to the U.S. as Obama’s words and actions are. Being alligned with nations like and especially Saudi Arabia, Turkee, and the Gulf States is an unholy alliance that we will pay dearly for in the near future. Islam and Muslims are toxic to freedom and prosperity. Churchill said it best: Islam is the world’s most “retrograde force.”

  • Ranchman

    We need to all stay on top of Obama’s agenda and everything he does. It just might give us a little bit of warning before he moves to crush us. The man is pathological in his hatred of this country and its citizens. We need all the advance notice we can get of what he might have planned for us.

  • http://www.marktraina.webs.com Mark N Starla Traina

    PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA is AMERICA’S
    GREATEST AMERICAN TRAITOR!

    PUBLIC
    ENEMY NUMBER 1:

    1)
    http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%20Government/Communism/barack_obama-enemy.htm

    2)
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2942427/posts

    3)
    http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2011/06/president-barack-obamas-complete-list.html

    4)
    http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1642

    5)
    http://www.notable-quotes.com/o/obama_barack.html

    6)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_LOXQ_jom8k

    7)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_LOXQ_jom8k#t=3

    8)
    http://lieoftheyear.org/landrieu

    9)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8URgZZhEM3w&feature=player_embedded

    10) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8URgZZhEM3w&feature=player_embedded#t=27

    OBAMA– PUBLIC RELATIONS STUNT in AFGHANISTAN
    in of MAY 2014!

    … more SMOKE & MIRRORS!

    President Barack Obama secretly slipped into Afghanistan under the cover of
    darkness Sunday for a weekend visit with U.S. troops serving in the closing
    months of America’s longest war.

    Air Force One landed at Bagram Air Field, the main U.S. base in
    Afghanistan, after an overnight flight from Washington. Obama was scheduled to
    spend just a few hours on the base and had no plans to travel to Kabul, the
    capital, to meet with Hamid Karzai, the mercurial president who has had a
    tumultuous relationship with the White House.

    Obama’s surprise trip comes as the U.S. and NATO withdraw most of their
    forces ahead of a year-end deadline. Obama is seeking to keep a small number of
    U.S. troops in Afghanistan beyond 2014 to train Afghan security forces and
    conduct counterterrorism missions. But that plan is contingent on Karzai’s
    successor signing a bilateral security agreement that Karzai has refused to
    authorize.

    Obama’s visit also was taking place against the backdrop of growing outrage
    in the United States over the treatment of America’s war veterans. More than
    two dozen veterans’ hospitals across America are under investigation over
    allegations of treatment delays and deaths, putting greater scrutiny on the
    Department of Veterans Affairs. The agency already was struggling to keep up
    with the influx of forces returning home from Afghanistan and Iraq.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/25/obama-surprises-troops_n_5389274.html

    NAAWP calls “BULL$HYT” on PRESIDENT
    OBAMA!

    PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA keeps BLOWING
    SMOKE UP OUR AZZES!

    A PRESIDENT who HISTORICALLY has
    provided better HEALTHCARE for our ENEMIES than our DISABLED and WOUNDED WARRIORS!

    ———IMPEACH BARACK OBAMA and
    IMPEACH him NOW!———

    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the
    ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE