<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Radical NLRB Recess Appointments Ruled Unconstitutional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 22:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: JacksonPearson</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-4197740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JacksonPearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 05:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=174977#comment-4197740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This kind of Constitutional corruption and usurpation is going on all over the nation. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of Constitutional corruption and usurpation is going on all over the nation. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JacksonPearson</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-4197732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JacksonPearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 05:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=174977#comment-4197732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LMAO...   
I was over on a liberal web site reading their leftist analysis, and comments. The Libs that were commenting, were crying and peeing all over themselves.   
   
The DC court of appeals handed Obama a resounding defeat. But as usual, Obama discounts federal courts, and continues business as though nothing have happened. If I am correct, the USDOJ have two months or 60 days to request an en banc hearing, or appeal to the Supreme Court. If he does neither, and his appointees are still in place, then he&#039;s in violation of the Constitution. House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell were supportive plaintiffs named in the lawsuit.   
   
If Obama fails to act, flips off the court&#039;s ruling and Congress, well then, things can get Constitutionally dicey for him. To be continued! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMAO&#8230;<br />
I was over on a liberal web site reading their leftist analysis, and comments. The Libs that were commenting, were crying and peeing all over themselves.   </p>
<p>The DC court of appeals handed Obama a resounding defeat. But as usual, Obama discounts federal courts, and continues business as though nothing have happened. If I am correct, the USDOJ have two months or 60 days to request an en banc hearing, or appeal to the Supreme Court. If he does neither, and his appointees are still in place, then he&#039;s in violation of the Constitution. House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell were supportive plaintiffs named in the lawsuit.   </p>
<p>If Obama fails to act, flips off the court&#039;s ruling and Congress, well then, things can get Constitutionally dicey for him. To be continued! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John E Foddrill sr</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-4197589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John E Foddrill sr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 04:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=174977#comment-4197589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama campaign co-chairman / Mayor Julian Castro, City Attorney Michael Bernard ( brother of White House Social Secretary Jeremy Bernard) and other city &#8220;leaders&#8221; follow in Obama&#8217;s footsteps&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.. &quot;It&#039;s d&#233;j&#224; vu all over again&quot;- Yogi Berra  
 
Texas Public Radio / KSTX reports that San Antonio TX city &#8220;leaders&#8221; are at the center of a federal civil rights lawsuit being filed by the Texas Civil Rights Project of Austin TX.  
 
 A second lawsuit - SA13CV0051XR- was filed on 1/17/2013 naming City defendants (Mayor Castro, CM Sculley, City Attorney Bernard, Council members (past and present), Chief McManus, etc) in their official AND individual capacities for Constitutional violations including the act of banning a law &#8211;abiding citizen from City Hall/Council meetings for reporting long-term, widespread public /police corruption, bond fraud, accounting fraud and the theft/misuse of tens of millions of tax/grant dollars.  
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://tpr.org/post/banned-city-hall&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://tpr.org/post/banned-city-hall&lt;/a&gt; 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.sacurrent.com/index.php/staff/city-attorney-talks-about-banning-citizens-from-city-hall/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://blogs.sacurrent.com/index.php/staff/city-a...&lt;/a&gt; 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama campaign co-chairman / Mayor Julian Castro, City Attorney Michael Bernard ( brother of White House Social Secretary Jeremy Bernard) and other city &ldquo;leaders&rdquo; follow in Obama&rsquo;s footsteps&hellip;&hellip;&hellip;&hellip;.. &quot;It&#039;s d&eacute;j&agrave; vu all over again&quot;- Yogi Berra  </p>
<p>Texas Public Radio / KSTX reports that San Antonio TX city &ldquo;leaders&rdquo; are at the center of a federal civil rights lawsuit being filed by the Texas Civil Rights Project of Austin TX.  </p>
<p> A second lawsuit &#8211; SA13CV0051XR- was filed on 1/17/2013 naming City defendants (Mayor Castro, CM Sculley, City Attorney Bernard, Council members (past and present), Chief McManus, etc) in their official AND individual capacities for Constitutional violations including the act of banning a law &ndash;abiding citizen from City Hall/Council meetings for reporting long-term, widespread public /police corruption, bond fraud, accounting fraud and the theft/misuse of tens of millions of tax/grant dollars.<br />
  <a href="http://tpr.org/post/banned-city-hall" rel="nofollow">http://tpr.org/post/banned-city-hall</a><br />
  <a href="http://blogs.sacurrent.com/index.php/staff/city-attorney-talks-about-banning-citizens-from-city-hall/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://blogs.sacurrent.com/index.php/staff/city-a" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.sacurrent.com/index.php/staff/city-a</a>&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JacksonPearson</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-4197022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JacksonPearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2013 01:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=174977#comment-4197022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My question is, if a federal court and appellate, can amazingly find a constitutional question to rule on against Barack Hussein Obama&#039;s NLRB appointments, than why can&#039;t they as well search Article II to rule on his eligibility, or forged birth certificate?&lt;b&gt; WHY?&lt;/b&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question is, if a federal court and appellate, can amazingly find a constitutional question to rule on against Barack Hussein Obama&#039;s NLRB appointments, than why can&#039;t they as well search Article II to rule on his eligibility, or forged birth certificate?<b> WHY?</b> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JCS</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-4196604</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JCS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=174977#comment-4196604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m waiting to hear this reprted on CNN and waiting and waitin and waiting... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m waiting to hear this reprted on CNN and waiting and waitin and waiting&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kasandra</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-4196106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kasandra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=174977#comment-4196106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Supreme Court it will be a 5 to 4 decision reversing the DC Circuit with Roberts writing the majority opinion concluding that it wasn&#039;t a &quot;recess appointment&quot; Obama made, it was just a &quot;hire&quot; and, therefore, was legal.  (Just joking.) ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Supreme Court it will be a 5 to 4 decision reversing the DC Circuit with Roberts writing the majority opinion concluding that it wasn&#039;t a &quot;recess appointment&quot; Obama made, it was just a &quot;hire&quot; and, therefore, was legal.  (Just joking.) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kasandra</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-4196096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kasandra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=174977#comment-4196096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just heard about it on ABC Radio Network news at 3:00 p.m. E.S.T.  They described it as limiting the President&#039;s authority to make recess appointments.  They didn&#039;t bother mentioning the essential fact - Congress was not in recess when he claimed the authority to make the &quot;recess&quot; appointments.  In other words, ABC to the contrary notwithstanding, the decision does nothing to curb a President&#039;s legitimate authority to make recess appointments.  It only rightly curbs his nonexistent authority to declare, contrary to Congress&#039; own determination, that Congress is not in session and that he thus has the right to unilaterally make appointments without the Senate&#039;s advice and consent. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just heard about it on ABC Radio Network news at 3:00 p.m. E.S.T.  They described it as limiting the President&#039;s authority to make recess appointments.  They didn&#039;t bother mentioning the essential fact &#8211; Congress was not in recess when he claimed the authority to make the &quot;recess&quot; appointments.  In other words, ABC to the contrary notwithstanding, the decision does nothing to curb a President&#039;s legitimate authority to make recess appointments.  It only rightly curbs his nonexistent authority to declare, contrary to Congress&#039; own determination, that Congress is not in session and that he thus has the right to unilaterally make appointments without the Senate&#039;s advice and consent. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghostwriter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-4196070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghostwriter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=174977#comment-4196070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve heard about this. Most likely,the Supreme Court will uphold the decision of the lower court but I don&#039;t really want to make predictions. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve heard about this. Most likely,the Supreme Court will uphold the decision of the lower court but I don&#039;t really want to make predictions. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-4195799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Sue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=174977#comment-4195799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well at least the Judges that turned out to be &quot;liberal&quot; aren&#039;t complete fools. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well at least the Judges that turned out to be &quot;liberal&quot; aren&#039;t complete fools. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pagegl</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-4195750</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pagegl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=174977#comment-4195750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bet this decision gets Obama&#039;s knickers in a twist. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet this decision gets Obama&#039;s knickers in a twist. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Ludwig</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-4195613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Ludwig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=174977#comment-4195613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An important article.  I haven&#039;t seen this news on any outlet. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An important article.  I haven&#039;t seen this news on any outlet. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: becky</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-4195595</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[becky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=174977#comment-4195595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did someone wake up?   Blinders coming off?   
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did someone wake up?   Blinders coming off?   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdinaK</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obamas-radical-nlrb-recess-appointments-ruled-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-4195548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AdinaK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=174977#comment-4195548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First off, kudos to the judges.  
Most significantly, fiddling with the Constitution is the purview of Obama and his surrogates, regardless of this or that setback - &lt;a href=&quot;http://adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/07/fiddling-with-the-constitution-to-eviscerate-term-limitations-on-the-presidency-why-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/07/fiddling-with...&lt;/a&gt;  
  
Nevertheless, it is an intrinsic outcome.   
  
Adina kutnicki, Israel - &lt;a href=&quot;http://adinakutnicki.com/about/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://adinakutnicki.com/about/&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, kudos to the judges.<br />
Most significantly, fiddling with the Constitution is the purview of Obama and his surrogates, regardless of this or that setback &#8211; <a href="http://adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/07/fiddling-with-the-constitution-to-eviscerate-term-limitations-on-the-presidency-why-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/07/fiddling-with" rel="nofollow">http://adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/07/fiddling-with</a>&#8230;  </p>
<p>Nevertheless, it is an intrinsic outcome.   </p>
<p>Adina kutnicki, Israel &#8211; <a href="http://adinakutnicki.com/about/" rel="nofollow">http://adinakutnicki.com/about/</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 549/558 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 17:48:23 by W3 Total Cache -->