Rubio Would Lose Latino Vote to Biden 60 to 28


biden

We have to pass amnesty right now to fill the country with unskilled poor Mexicans who are the Latino demographic least likely under any conceivable set of circumstances to vote Republican.

And even after becoming the champion of amnesty, Marco Rubio would still decisively lose the Latino vote to Joe Biden. What do you call that? De Facto Destructiveness?

In a potential 2016 presidential election matchup, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would beat Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) among Latinos, a poll out Monday shows.

Clinton is the favorite to Rubio 66 percent to 28 percent, the survey from Latino Decisions reports. Rubio also loses in a potential matchup against Vice President Joe Biden 60 percent to 28 percent.

In all the potential 2016 matchups featured in the poll, Clinton and Biden beat former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Rubio handily.

Why is Rubio losing the Latino vote to Biden of all people? He’s not. Democrats are just winning the Latino vote, which they tend to do. Especially the newly organized low income Latino vote.

The biggest determinant for Latino Republican votes was never immigration. It was income. Filling the country with low income Latino voters is a formula for more 60-28 blowouts.

It’s not about amnesty. It’s about class. It’s about welfare. It’s about government employees and social services.

Rubio can talk about his parents until he’s blue in the face, but it doesn’t change the fact that today’s unskilled immigrants are walking into a welfare state designed to suck them in and get them voting Democrat to protect it.

Any talk about winning the Latino vote has to deal with 1. the welfare state and 2. Making the GOP more competitive among low income voters.

Amnesty without points 1 and 2 is just a GOP elites suicide pact.

  • ziggy zoggy

    Latins will not vote Republican and there is no doubt about that. But polls are as scientific as astrology and the methodology behind this one is as reliable as a Mexican brain surgeon. Latins will ALWAYS support another “Latin” over a Gringo no matter how repulsive the Latin may be or how attractive the gringo may be. That is a fact that anybody who has lived with Latins knows by heart. And I mean ALL support. Votes, legislation, fandom, hiring, you name it. Ignore it at your own peril – and that of your descendants.

    • OfficialPro

      more correctly, commie Latinos will not vote Republican.

      • ziggy zoggy

        OP, most Latins are unabashed and greedy capitalists but they are racist and bigoted to the core. They will vote beaner first and Democrat second. Look at every voting district they control. They are all the same. Always have been, always will be.

        • Profit

          The irony of this post. Calls Latinos racist and bigoted then calls them beaners. There isnt much of a difference between you and the low-IQ Obama liberal freebie voters.

          • ziggy zoggy

            As a “Latino” yourself you know that what I write is true. Stop tying to apply my accurate group description to all members of that group. The majority of beaners are racist bloc voters so it really doesn’t matter that the minority of them are not. Just because you care about America doesn’t mean your bean brethren do.
            And BTW, I don’t care what you say about me personally but Whites are overwhelmingly non-racist, and I am not a racist for noticing that most beaners are.

    • John Prospero

      That is not true. Just last week in Massachussettes, the latinos voted for an old white guy (Deomocrat) over a pro-amnesty, pro-open border, pro everything LATINO republican….
      Bottom line…they want freebies and pandering…and they know the party that give them that.

      • ziggy zoggy

        I call bullshit. Prove your lie.

        • Profit

          You might just be a liberal in the closet, you just don’t know it yet! So if hypothetically youre given power, the first people you would get rid of are minorities. Gee, that extreme racism sounds a lot like MarxismCommunism.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Mexico is not a race, it is a country, and repatriating wetbacks is not the same as a pogrom. Spare me the histrionics.

  • defcon 4

    An article that indirectly (or directly) supports Greenfield’s earlier article on population replacement. Labour did it in the UK and now the democrats are doing it here in the USA. No wonder the democrats can’t afford to have voter ID requirements enforced.

    • Isabel Herron

      like Pamela answered I’m stunned that any body can make $6689 in 4 weeks on the computer. did you look at this page w­w­w.K­E­P­2.c­o­m

  • DebRollin

    This is laughable…Biden is a dufus….even the Dems are embarrased by him!

    • ziggy zoggy

      Biden couldn’t win a stupid contest with Richard Ramirez or Juan Corona, but he could easily win a Dem district. That’s how he became a Senator.

  • Gee

    Let’s face it even the Democrats and Republicans call them unregistered Democrats

  • AlecJ

    If that doesnt tell you all you need to know.

    How does this nation survive if the voter base is so pathetically uninformed?

    In my opinion, we should tell Mexico to pound sand, close the borders and stop illegal immigration. What will happen, Biden will get 65%?

    If we allow tens of millions of future Democrats into the country its game over.

    Hey Rubio— you see this? You cannot win these voters over with your open pandering? They hate you anyway…so why screw over the rest of us?

    The GOP is a joke and Rubio is the punchline.

  • jhsif

    Even the democraps are not stupid enough to run on the democrapic idea of amnesty! THEY ALWAYS RUN ON A CONSERVATIVE TICKET!!!!!! HMMM SHOULDN’T THAT TELL YOU IDIOTS SOMETHING?!