Senator Graham Blasts Obama for Not Sending “Spokesman for 9/11″ to Gitmo

Visit for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Senator Lindsey Graham doesn’t have a great track record, but when he’s right, he’s right, and in this case, he’s clearly right. Obama is subverting national security in every area that he can and trying to de-militarize the War on Terror by treating it like a civilian criminal matter is something that he has been trying to do for a while.

Even as government officials applauded the arrest of Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, Osama bin Laden’s son-in-law and an al-Qaida spokesman, his transport to the United States stirred a debate among lawmakers who appeared caught by surprise by the news.

Abu Ghaith was apprehended, transported to New York and charged with conspiracy to kill Americans, according to court documents unsealed Thursday. Abu Ghaith appeared alongside his father-in-law in a 2001 video in which they took responsibility for the 9/11 attacks and warned of more.

Abu Ghaith’s trial will be one of the first prosecutions of senior al-Qaida leaders in the United States. Upon taking office in 2009, President Barack Obama said more foreign terror suspects should be charged in American federal courts, as part of his goal to close Guantanamo Bay.

Republicans in Congress would like to keep Guantanamo open and have strongly opposed bringing terror suspects on U.S. soil.

“We believe the administration’s decision here to bring this person to New York City, if that’s what’s happened, without letting Congress know is a very bad precedent to set,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who held a press conference with Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H, Thursday.

“And when we find somebody like this, this close to bin Laden and the senior al-Qaida leadership, the last thing in the world we want to do, in my opinion, is put them in civilian court. This man should be in Guantanamo Bay,” Ayotte said.

“So we’re putting the administration on notice,” said Graham. “We think that sneaking this guy into the country, clearly going around the intent of Congress when it comes to enemy combatants, will be challenged.”

Republicans have been fumbling the foreign policy debate for a while by embracing the Arab Spring and refusing to take a position on Afghanistan.

This is a clear and simple area where Republicans can set themselves apart from the Democrats. Terrorism is not a crime problem. It is a war being carried out against America. And those who engage in it should not be given an ACLU limo, but a trip over near Cuba and all the water they can drink.

  • Anonymous

    Exactly! There was an idiot on CNN (yes, a former Canadian and one whom I suspect despises America — she is the essence of a "bubble head") who gleefully asserted that some documents the terrorist signed would be inadmissible in the civilian courts unlike in a military court — and then this air headed CNN Leftist anti-American falsely alleged that at Gitmo confessions obtained through torture are admissible as evidence. (Why doesn't she just move to Cuba or North Korea? Get the hell out of the United States.) Laughably it took another Leftist to correct her lie — Jeffrey Toobin — he then went on about how necessary it is to have the terrorist read his Miranda "rights"!! How I despise Obama! The anti-Americans are no longer abroad — they are on the inside!

    • Daniel Greenfield

      Yes they are.

      always have been

      • Anonymous

        But in the past, the anti-Americans (as much as I recall) were on the margins, the fringes. Now, in the midst of an undeclared war, we have a President, his Secretary of State, the head of the CIA, the Dept of defense, etc — all espousing pro-terrorist rhetoric. (If this had occurred during the Cold War, the U.S. would have become a Soviet Socialist republic.) I believe the current situation is unprecedented.

        • Toni_Pereira

          "If the battle for civilization comes down to the wimps versus the barbarians, the barbarians are going to win."
          Thomas Sowell

          We should send all the wimps(Pseudointellectuals from Europe and North America) to Gittmo…

  • Anonymous

    Andrew McCarthy (I believe it was in his book, Willful Blindness) argued that one of the primary reasons he was opposed to civilian trials for terrorists was because it potentially imperils the rights given to American citizens accused of criminal offenses. In other words, the prosecutor (to gain a conviction against a terrorist) will have to ignore rights traditionally given to the accused — and if you don't stretch these boundaries, the terrorist walks free. So, once again, thanks to the current anti-American in the White House, the United States of America takes yet another step on the path to a Banana Republic.

  • AdinaK

    It was pathetically, patently obvious that the Repubs were incapable of doing the right thing, as soon as they unveiled their platform, but even before that –

    Doubtful RINOS at the helm will ever set the record straight!

    Adina Kutnicki, Israel