<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ted Koppel Writes the Dumbest Op-Ed About Terrorism You Can Imagine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: tagalog</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5258114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tagalog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5258114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Idiot squared.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idiot squared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tagalog</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5258109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tagalog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5258109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you.  Yes, World War I was not about terror.  I don&#039;t know what the death tally for World War I was, but 37 million is a common number cited for World War II&#039;s death toll.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you.  Yes, World War I was not about terror.  I don&#8217;t know what the death tally for World War I was, but 37 million is a common number cited for World War II&#8217;s death toll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tagalog</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5258108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tagalog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5258108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An organization that can intimidate Western nations to point where the U.S. pulls 19 of its embassies out, and other Western nations also pull their embassies out, is NOT, as Mr. Koppel has claimed, &quot;decimated and battered by more than a decade of the worst damage that the world’s most powerful nation can inflict.&quot;  It is an organization of considerable power. 

Furthermore, the United States and the coalition of nations that have joined to fight terrorism have NOT spent the last decade inflicting &quot;the worst damage that the world&#039;s most powerful nation can inflict.&quot;  The coalition has been quite restrained in its use of destructive power in fighting terror.  TOO restrained for the taste of some people.

We haven&#039;t used cluster bombs.  After 2001, we haven&#039;t used MOABs, or those BLU-numbers.  I haven&#039;t heard of any thermobaric bombs being used; they would have worked well at Abbottabad if we&#039;d been willing to have collateral damage occur.  We haven&#039;t used napalm.  We haven&#039;t even taken out the training camps, some of whom we have located and could easily strafe into worm-sized pieces.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An organization that can intimidate Western nations to point where the U.S. pulls 19 of its embassies out, and other Western nations also pull their embassies out, is NOT, as Mr. Koppel has claimed, &#8220;decimated and battered by more than a decade of the worst damage that the world’s most powerful nation can inflict.&#8221;  It is an organization of considerable power. </p>
<p>Furthermore, the United States and the coalition of nations that have joined to fight terrorism have NOT spent the last decade inflicting &#8220;the worst damage that the world&#8217;s most powerful nation can inflict.&#8221;  The coalition has been quite restrained in its use of destructive power in fighting terror.  TOO restrained for the taste of some people.</p>
<p>We haven&#8217;t used cluster bombs.  After 2001, we haven&#8217;t used MOABs, or those BLU-numbers.  I haven&#8217;t heard of any thermobaric bombs being used; they would have worked well at Abbottabad if we&#8217;d been willing to have collateral damage occur.  We haven&#8217;t used napalm.  We haven&#8217;t even taken out the training camps, some of whom we have located and could easily strafe into worm-sized pieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kikorikid</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5257611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kikorikid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5257611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[STOP!!!
     JIHAD=STRATEGY
     TERRORISM=TACTIC
Terrorism is the chosen tactic of violent Jihadist.
What IS endemic to Islamism is violence.
You do not sound familiar the Quran or Mohammed
as you would not have made the statements above.
Mohammeds,latter period, Sura 87 and beyond to 114
are loaded with violence and proscriptions for it.
Your last sentence is a defence of Islamic terrorism.
Is that what you meant?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STOP!!!<br />
     JIHAD=STRATEGY<br />
     TERRORISM=TACTIC<br />
Terrorism is the chosen tactic of violent Jihadist.<br />
What IS endemic to Islamism is violence.<br />
You do not sound familiar the Quran or Mohammed<br />
as you would not have made the statements above.<br />
Mohammeds,latter period, Sura 87 and beyond to 114<br />
are loaded with violence and proscriptions for it.<br />
Your last sentence is a defence of Islamic terrorism.<br />
Is that what you meant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LEL817</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5257148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LEL817]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2013 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5257148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;In February of 1993, before most of us had any real awareness of al Qaeda, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who would later be identified as the principal architect of 9/11, financed an earlier attack on the World Trade Center with car bombs that killed six and injured more than 1,000.

Five years later, al Qaeda launched synchronized attacks on U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing more than 220 and injuring well over 4,000 people. In October 2000, al Qaeda operatives rammed a boat carrying explosives into the USS Cole, which was docked in Yemen. Seventeen American sailors were killed and 39 were injured.

Each of these attacks occurred during the presidency of Bill Clinton. In each case, the U.S. responded with caution and restraint. Covert and special operations were launched. The U.S. came close to killing or capturing Osama bin Laden at least twice, but there was a clear awareness among many policy makers that bin Laden might be trying to lure the U.S. into overreacting. Clinton administration counterterrorism policy erred, if at all, on the side of excessive caution&quot;.
.......................................................................................................................
Doesn&#039;t this contradict Ted Koppel&#039;s claim? Bill Clinton didn&#039;t &quot;overreact&quot; yet what followed Clinton&#039;s cautious response was the most catastrophic terrorist attack we ever had on 9/11. Perhaps if Clinton did &quot;overreact&quot; 9/11 just might have been avoided.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In February of 1993, before most of us had any real awareness of al Qaeda, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who would later be identified as the principal architect of 9/11, financed an earlier attack on the World Trade Center with car bombs that killed six and injured more than 1,000.</p>
<p>Five years later, al Qaeda launched synchronized attacks on U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing more than 220 and injuring well over 4,000 people. In October 2000, al Qaeda operatives rammed a boat carrying explosives into the USS Cole, which was docked in Yemen. Seventeen American sailors were killed and 39 were injured.</p>
<p>Each of these attacks occurred during the presidency of Bill Clinton. In each case, the U.S. responded with caution and restraint. Covert and special operations were launched. The U.S. came close to killing or capturing Osama bin Laden at least twice, but there was a clear awareness among many policy makers that bin Laden might be trying to lure the U.S. into overreacting. Clinton administration counterterrorism policy erred, if at all, on the side of excessive caution&#8221;.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
Doesn&#8217;t this contradict Ted Koppel&#8217;s claim? Bill Clinton didn&#8217;t &#8220;overreact&#8221; yet what followed Clinton&#8217;s cautious response was the most catastrophic terrorist attack we ever had on 9/11. Perhaps if Clinton did &#8220;overreact&#8221; 9/11 just might have been avoided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ObamaYoMoma</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5256988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ObamaYoMoma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2013 03:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5256988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jihad and terrorism are not the same manifestations, but nevertheless jihad is always conflated as somehow being terrorism, and because it is always conflated as somehow being terrorism, it opens the door for self-hating loons like Ted Koppel to idiotically blame America first for creating terrorism. However, jihad, in stark contrast to terrorism, is holy fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam, while terrorism, on the other hand, is perpetrated for all kinds of various political causes. Not to mention that terrorism is always and only violent, while jihad, in stark contrast, manifests both violently and non-violently, but astronomically far more non-violently relative to violently. In addition, only Muslims wage jihad, while terrorists emanate from all societies and cultures. Thus, jihad and terrorism in reality are two completely different and very distinct manifestations altogether. 

Hence, when self-hating loons like Koppel and his ilk confuse what is really jihad for being terrorism, they inevitably blame American foreign policy or the alleged greed of American capitalism for generating terrorism. However, I hate to rain on Koppel and his ilk&#039;s self-hating parade, but it&#039;s not terrorism that is the problem. Instead, the problem is jihad, and Muslims always and only wage jihad in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam. Hence, Muslims are waging jihad to make Islam supreme, and that doesn&#039;t have anything whatsoever to do with America&#039;s foreign policy, the alleged greed of American capitalism, or with terrorism, for that matter. Indeed, we are in the midst of a war called the &quot;war on terror&quot; and it inevitably has blown up in our faces, because terrorism is not even an Islamic manifestation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jihad and terrorism are not the same manifestations, but nevertheless jihad is always conflated as somehow being terrorism, and because it is always conflated as somehow being terrorism, it opens the door for self-hating loons like Ted Koppel to idiotically blame America first for creating terrorism. However, jihad, in stark contrast to terrorism, is holy fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam, while terrorism, on the other hand, is perpetrated for all kinds of various political causes. Not to mention that terrorism is always and only violent, while jihad, in stark contrast, manifests both violently and non-violently, but astronomically far more non-violently relative to violently. In addition, only Muslims wage jihad, while terrorists emanate from all societies and cultures. Thus, jihad and terrorism in reality are two completely different and very distinct manifestations altogether. </p>
<p>Hence, when self-hating loons like Koppel and his ilk confuse what is really jihad for being terrorism, they inevitably blame American foreign policy or the alleged greed of American capitalism for generating terrorism. However, I hate to rain on Koppel and his ilk&#8217;s self-hating parade, but it&#8217;s not terrorism that is the problem. Instead, the problem is jihad, and Muslims always and only wage jihad in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam. Hence, Muslims are waging jihad to make Islam supreme, and that doesn&#8217;t have anything whatsoever to do with America&#8217;s foreign policy, the alleged greed of American capitalism, or with terrorism, for that matter. Indeed, we are in the midst of a war called the &#8220;war on terror&#8221; and it inevitably has blown up in our faces, because terrorism is not even an Islamic manifestation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gray_man</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5256975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gray_man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2013 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5256975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch SNL.
Ted Koppel: idiot. Played by Al Franken: idiot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch SNL.<br />
Ted Koppel: idiot. Played by Al Franken: idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5256963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Omar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2013 01:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5256963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Between 1914 and 1918, 37 million soldiers and civilians were injured or killed.&quot;


Ted Koppel got his facts wrong on the number of casualties in World War I as well. Historians estimated that around 8 million people died in the war in those four years. That number is smaller than the number of Ukrainian farmers who died in Stalin&#039;s Holodomour in the 1930s (about 10 million people died in that intentional starvation made b y the Soviet dictatorship). Also, Koppel forgot to mention that World War II had far more casualties than its predecessor. Besides, everyone knows that World War I was fought over commerce as well as for reasons of MAIN, which is the acronym for Militarism, Alliances, Imperialism and Nationalism. I learned about MAIN in high school.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Between 1914 and 1918, 37 million soldiers and civilians were injured or killed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ted Koppel got his facts wrong on the number of casualties in World War I as well. Historians estimated that around 8 million people died in the war in those four years. That number is smaller than the number of Ukrainian farmers who died in Stalin&#8217;s Holodomour in the 1930s (about 10 million people died in that intentional starvation made b y the Soviet dictatorship). Also, Koppel forgot to mention that World War II had far more casualties than its predecessor. Besides, everyone knows that World War I was fought over commerce as well as for reasons of MAIN, which is the acronym for Militarism, Alliances, Imperialism and Nationalism. I learned about MAIN in high school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5256957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2013 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5256957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5256956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2013 01:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5256956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The point is that the war was not about terror. It simply allowed factions to start moving on their plans.


Even jihad is not about terror per se. That&#039;s part of the problem with these deranged leftist fallacies.


The jihadis don&#039;t dream about &#039;a world in terror.&quot; They dream about using any means to achieve sharia. The over-reaction that serves jihadi objectives is the deranged leftist reaction to defending our civilization.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point is that the war was not about terror. It simply allowed factions to start moving on their plans.</p>
<p>Even jihad is not about terror per se. That&#8217;s part of the problem with these deranged leftist fallacies.</p>
<p>The jihadis don&#8217;t dream about &#8216;a world in terror.&#8221; They dream about using any means to achieve sharia. The over-reaction that serves jihadi objectives is the deranged leftist reaction to defending our civilization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5256955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2013 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5256955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the photo above is from an SNL skit. Ted&#039;s wig is a lot worse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the photo above is from an SNL skit. Ted&#8217;s wig is a lot worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5256942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2013 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5256942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember Koppel claiming that the Sudanese conflict was &quot;only about oil.&quot; What a maroon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember Koppel claiming that the Sudanese conflict was &#8220;only about oil.&#8221; What a maroon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5256923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Apple]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5256923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not certain that Gavrilo Princip was backed by the Serbian government.  At Princip&#039;s trial in October 1914, no evidence was found to prove a link between him and the government.  Despite a host of witnesses and defendants (about 12 defendants in total), no link was confirmed.

However, there is no doubt that elements of the Serbian military had provided bombs, pistols and cyanide pills to Princip and his co-conspirators.  This came out in court, and is not disputed.

You need to remember that Princip and his co-conspirators were amateurs with passionate anti-Austrian beliefs.  They were propelled by their beliefs.  Their beliefs were similar to the American revolutionaries: no taxation without representation.

Princip succeeded due to an extraordinary set of circumstances, a perfect storm of human error and human determination.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not certain that Gavrilo Princip was backed by the Serbian government.  At Princip&#8217;s trial in October 1914, no evidence was found to prove a link between him and the government.  Despite a host of witnesses and defendants (about 12 defendants in total), no link was confirmed.</p>
<p>However, there is no doubt that elements of the Serbian military had provided bombs, pistols and cyanide pills to Princip and his co-conspirators.  This came out in court, and is not disputed.</p>
<p>You need to remember that Princip and his co-conspirators were amateurs with passionate anti-Austrian beliefs.  They were propelled by their beliefs.  Their beliefs were similar to the American revolutionaries: no taxation without representation.</p>
<p>Princip succeeded due to an extraordinary set of circumstances, a perfect storm of human error and human determination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VHG1</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5256896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VHG1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5256896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proving again, you don&#039;t have to know anything to be &quot;brilliant&quot; in lib circles! They&#039;re all as intentionally uninformed as Ted is! Now let&#039;s sit back and read some Maya Angelou incoherence!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proving again, you don&#8217;t have to know anything to be &#8220;brilliant&#8221; in lib circles! They&#8217;re all as intentionally uninformed as Ted is! Now let&#8217;s sit back and read some Maya Angelou incoherence!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MZAZ86442i</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5256887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MZAZ86442i]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5256887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is the ugliest wig I have ever seen. LMFAO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the ugliest wig I have ever seen. LMFAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DogmaelJones1</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5256834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DogmaelJones1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5256834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Koppel not only had a continuing bad hair day (blame the  hair spray and the studio make-up artist), but a continuing bad-brain day. He is a permanent, dues-paying resident of La-La Land, living in a bubble that won&#039;t burst, not even with a nuclear weapon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Koppel not only had a continuing bad hair day (blame the  hair spray and the studio make-up artist), but a continuing bad-brain day. He is a permanent, dues-paying resident of La-La Land, living in a bubble that won&#8217;t burst, not even with a nuclear weapon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mittymo</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/ted-koppel-writes-the-dumbest-op-ed-about-terrorism-you-can-imagine/comment-page-1/#comment-5256827</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mittymo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199792#comment-5256827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Ted writes about anything, you can pretty much be sure it will be amongst the dumbest things written.

I lost all respect for him when he claimed to have found an eyewitness in Vietnam that remembered the specifics about a single skirmish that occurred there 40 years prior (such skirmishes couldn&#039;t be identified by name or number &amp; must&#039;ve all looked the same) among perhaps tens of thousands of such incidents.  Really Ted?  Really?  You thought people would believe that?

Here&#039;s what I believe.  If you gave a Vietnamese peasant a carton of cigarettes, he&#039;d likely say anything you wanted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Ted writes about anything, you can pretty much be sure it will be amongst the dumbest things written.</p>
<p>I lost all respect for him when he claimed to have found an eyewitness in Vietnam that remembered the specifics about a single skirmish that occurred there 40 years prior (such skirmishes couldn&#8217;t be identified by name or number &amp; must&#8217;ve all looked the same) among perhaps tens of thousands of such incidents.  Really Ted?  Really?  You thought people would believe that?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I believe.  If you gave a Vietnamese peasant a carton of cigarettes, he&#8217;d likely say anything you wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 628/648 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 14:11:46 by W3 Total Cache -->