<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Syria and Commonsense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 04:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5250771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5250771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The poll shows that the American people prefer to go to war with missiles and drones, i.e., things that can be launched from aircraft carriers in the Mediterranean and airbases in the heartland, actions which demonstrate a very limited role against Assad, vs. arming rebels, which if history is our guide, is a step towards putting our own GIs in harms&#039;s way.  First it&#039;s arming the rebels, second it&#039;s having troops to show them how to use them...etc.    

Hey, you&#039;re right that Obama is making a mistake in arming rebels in Syria (if Congress actually lets him - it&#039;s looking less likely) but you try so hard to demonize him that it blows up in your face and you are exposed as a liar and a propagandist.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The poll shows that the American people prefer to go to war with missiles and drones, i.e., things that can be launched from aircraft carriers in the Mediterranean and airbases in the heartland, actions which demonstrate a very limited role against Assad, vs. arming rebels, which if history is our guide, is a step towards putting our own GIs in harms&#8217;s way.  First it&#8217;s arming the rebels, second it&#8217;s having troops to show them how to use them&#8230;etc.    </p>
<p>Hey, you&#8217;re right that Obama is making a mistake in arming rebels in Syria (if Congress actually lets him &#8211; it&#8217;s looking less likely) but you try so hard to demonize him that it blows up in your face and you are exposed as a liar and a propagandist.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5250768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5250768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not &quot;invasion&quot; given the context within the poll that you cite for your latest propaganda.  The question goes out of its way to distinguish the use of stand-off weapons vs. taking actions where soldiers get hurt, i.e., boots on the ground, i.e., an invasion.  You are lying again.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not &#8220;invasion&#8221; given the context within the poll that you cite for your latest propaganda.  The question goes out of its way to distinguish the use of stand-off weapons vs. taking actions where soldiers get hurt, i.e., boots on the ground, i.e., an invasion.  You are lying again.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5250055</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2013 03:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5250055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bottom line is that more Americans support going to war with Syria... than supporting arming the rebels.


Your explanation that the opposition to arming the rebels is really an opposing to more wars of choice is null and void.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bottom line is that more Americans support going to war with Syria&#8230; than supporting arming the rebels.</p>
<p>Your explanation that the opposition to arming the rebels is really an opposing to more wars of choice is null and void.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5250053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2013 03:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5250053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Entering the airspace of a foreign country and bombing it is an invasion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Entering the airspace of a foreign country and bombing it is an invasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5249138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5249138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I not only saw Question 51, I quoted it above:  

&quot;Do you think the United States should or should not use weapons which don&#039;t risk American lives, such as drones and cruise missiles, to attack Syrian government targets?&quot;

This question distinguishes between the use of stand-off weapons, vs. an invasion. Invasions &quot;risk American lives,&quot; while drones and cruise missiles do not.  
 
See Commandment #9.  Just because it&#039;s towards the bottom of the list doesn&#039;t mean its just a recommendation.  
 
I don&#039;t merely refer to you as Danny &quot;Goebbels&quot; Greenfield as an epithet (but at least you recognize it as one).  I use it as an accurate analogy for someone who consciously and viciously lies and propagandizes for a living.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I not only saw Question 51, I quoted it above:  </p>
<p>&#8220;Do you think the United States should or should not use weapons which don&#8217;t risk American lives, such as drones and cruise missiles, to attack Syrian government targets?&#8221;</p>
<p>This question distinguishes between the use of stand-off weapons, vs. an invasion. Invasions &#8220;risk American lives,&#8221; while drones and cruise missiles do not.  </p>
<p>See Commandment #9.  Just because it&#8217;s towards the bottom of the list doesn&#8217;t mean its just a recommendation.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t merely refer to you as Danny &#8220;Goebbels&#8221; Greenfield as an epithet (but at least you recognize it as one).  I use it as an accurate analogy for someone who consciously and viciously lies and propagandizes for a living.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 03:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5248945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See Question 51


Also Godwin&#039;s Law]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See Question 51</p>
<p>Also Godwin&#8217;s Law</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William James Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William James Ward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5248910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama regime is determined to support Islamist killers and
there is no changing that now, not until the next election and
the people vote out the anti-American professional criminal
politicians. Any military hardware given to the so called rebels
(Islamist murderers) will be used against Americans in the future.
I thought Republicans were just jellyfish frauds but no am sure
they are complicit with Democrats to turn us into a serf citizenry
where they dictate to us who they allow to have some of what
we work for but not that much. It would be nice to get rid of
every one of these thieving rats and allow them to scrub prison
walls, fill out chain gang quotas and serve as a warning to those
who cheat and demean the citizens of America.............William]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama regime is determined to support Islamist killers and<br />
there is no changing that now, not until the next election and<br />
the people vote out the anti-American professional criminal<br />
politicians. Any military hardware given to the so called rebels<br />
(Islamist murderers) will be used against Americans in the future.<br />
I thought Republicans were just jellyfish frauds but no am sure<br />
they are complicit with Democrats to turn us into a serf citizenry<br />
where they dictate to us who they allow to have some of what<br />
we work for but not that much. It would be nice to get rid of<br />
every one of these thieving rats and allow them to scrub prison<br />
walls, fill out chain gang quotas and serve as a warning to those<br />
who cheat and demean the citizens of America&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.William</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5248865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The poll doesn&#039;t even ask about invasion, nor could any of its questions be construed as asking about invasion.

So once again you are lying.  
  
&quot;Do you think it is in the national interest of the United States to be involved in the conflict in Syria, or not?&quot; is not asking about invasion.  
   
&quot;Do you think the United States should or should not use weapons which don&#039;t risk American lives, such as drones and cruise missiles, to attack Syrian government targets?&quot; specifically excludes invasion.  

Good try, Goebbels.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The poll doesn&#8217;t even ask about invasion, nor could any of its questions be construed as asking about invasion.</p>
<p>So once again you are lying.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Do you think it is in the national interest of the United States to be involved in the conflict in Syria, or not?&#8221; is not asking about invasion.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Do you think the United States should or should not use weapons which don&#8217;t risk American lives, such as drones and cruise missiles, to attack Syrian government targets?&#8221; specifically excludes invasion.  </p>
<p>Good try, Goebbels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248831</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5248831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The poll shows more support for an invasion than for arming terrorists


So that explanation falls flat]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The poll shows more support for an invasion than for arming terrorists</p>
<p>So that explanation falls flat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5248829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;...First off, Arab Spring, did not just happen, it was planned, contrived, then executed, by who? by us, in the &quot;west&quot;

I disagree. The West was reactive, rather than proactive.  The Arab Spring was inevitable and only looks dramatic and surprising today, but the Western Powers&#039; 100+ year control over the Middle East has been diminishing for quite a while.  We are living through an inevitable movement of history.  

&quot;We took out governments who were actually friendly to wards us, and not so friendly to the Muslim Brotherhood.&quot;

&quot;We&quot; didn&#039;t &quot;take out&quot; anybody.  We just chose not to actively help tyrants wipe out masses of people demanding self government and free elections.  The choice was a.) accepting that Arabs were taking control of their destiny in ways that may make us nervous, or b.) helping tyrants like Mubarak brutally crush hundreds of thousands of pro-freedom revolutionaries, destroying our credibililty in the world as a beacon of democracy, and providing a jihadist recruitment campaign against America which bin Laden could only dream of.  Wisely, thank God, we accepted to deal with the changing reality.  

Do I think there are forces who love the idea of another massive, global war?  Absolutely.  Arms manufacturers and the senators and congressmen whose constituencies work for them, the Halliburtons of the world, industrialists, oil men, evangelical Christians hoping for Armageddon, Israel Firsters, etc.

It&#039;s why we need to be so very clear about what are interests are and are not, in the world, and stop treating every dictator in some desert as a personal affront to American honor.  We must get off this addiction to war, or it will be our undoing, as it has been for every empire in history.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;First off, Arab Spring, did not just happen, it was planned, contrived, then executed, by who? by us, in the &#8220;west&#8221;</p>
<p>I disagree. The West was reactive, rather than proactive.  The Arab Spring was inevitable and only looks dramatic and surprising today, but the Western Powers&#8217; 100+ year control over the Middle East has been diminishing for quite a while.  We are living through an inevitable movement of history.  </p>
<p>&#8220;We took out governments who were actually friendly to wards us, and not so friendly to the Muslim Brotherhood.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8221; didn&#8217;t &#8220;take out&#8221; anybody.  We just chose not to actively help tyrants wipe out masses of people demanding self government and free elections.  The choice was a.) accepting that Arabs were taking control of their destiny in ways that may make us nervous, or b.) helping tyrants like Mubarak brutally crush hundreds of thousands of pro-freedom revolutionaries, destroying our credibililty in the world as a beacon of democracy, and providing a jihadist recruitment campaign against America which bin Laden could only dream of.  Wisely, thank God, we accepted to deal with the changing reality.  </p>
<p>Do I think there are forces who love the idea of another massive, global war?  Absolutely.  Arms manufacturers and the senators and congressmen whose constituencies work for them, the Halliburtons of the world, industrialists, oil men, evangelical Christians hoping for Armageddon, Israel Firsters, etc.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s why we need to be so very clear about what are interests are and are not, in the world, and stop treating every dictator in some desert as a personal affront to American honor.  We must get off this addiction to war, or it will be our undoing, as it has been for every empire in history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248797</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5248797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wrong, Danny.
 
There is zero indication that the broad majority of Americans reject arming Syrian rebels because it comprises a &quot;...policy of giving weapons to terrorists who are certain to use them against us,&quot; as in American citizens at home, or while &quot;on their next vacation flight.&quot;  

Americans no longer buy your neo-con lies that we need to &quot;fight them over there so we don&#039;t need to fight them over here,&quot; and are starting to figure out that the more &quot;over there&quot; we are, the more &quot;over here&quot; our enemies want to be.

Americans reject arming the rebels because we reject more wars of choice in the Middle East, and arming Syrian rebels is the first step to invading Syria.

Americans don&#039;t have a deep understanding of the different parties over there, and are wise enough not to really care.  Everything from the Mediterranean to the Sahara to the Hindu Kush is all just one big, bloody, Islamist hornets nest, and we&#039;re done playing the Great Game which has been paying us diminishing returns for decades now.  

We reject the Syria game because we reject being the world&#039;s policeman, and defining our nation by the wars we fight.  Unfortunately for Goebbels Greenfield and other Israel First hacks, this includes an American disinclination to invade and occupy Iran on behalf of Israel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong, Danny.</p>
<p>There is zero indication that the broad majority of Americans reject arming Syrian rebels because it comprises a &#8220;&#8230;policy of giving weapons to terrorists who are certain to use them against us,&#8221; as in American citizens at home, or while &#8220;on their next vacation flight.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Americans no longer buy your neo-con lies that we need to &#8220;fight them over there so we don&#8217;t need to fight them over here,&#8221; and are starting to figure out that the more &#8220;over there&#8221; we are, the more &#8220;over here&#8221; our enemies want to be.</p>
<p>Americans reject arming the rebels because we reject more wars of choice in the Middle East, and arming Syrian rebels is the first step to invading Syria.</p>
<p>Americans don&#8217;t have a deep understanding of the different parties over there, and are wise enough not to really care.  Everything from the Mediterranean to the Sahara to the Hindu Kush is all just one big, bloody, Islamist hornets nest, and we&#8217;re done playing the Great Game which has been paying us diminishing returns for decades now.  </p>
<p>We reject the Syria game because we reject being the world&#8217;s policeman, and defining our nation by the wars we fight.  Unfortunately for Goebbels Greenfield and other Israel First hacks, this includes an American disinclination to invade and occupy Iran on behalf of Israel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Gersh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Gersh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5248701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Syria under the Assads has never been a friend to the USA, and neither have any flavor of Islamists ever been on our side. One of the oldest dicta of military doctrine is to not interfere when your enemies are destroying each other.


Personally, I have always felt that any time arabs are killing each other and they cannot blame the Jews, that&#039;s a good thing. And, if there is going to be a war between the Shi&#039;a and Sunni muslims, which side do we want to take in that mess anyway? We took the moslem side against the Christian Serbs, and there was never a very good reason for that either, and less than stellar results. Kosovo anyone? How did helping moslem killers ever help our position in the world?



Sometimes doing nothing is the best course of action. If the images of killing upset us, how can killing even more people be the right thing to do?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Syria under the Assads has never been a friend to the USA, and neither have any flavor of Islamists ever been on our side. One of the oldest dicta of military doctrine is to not interfere when your enemies are destroying each other.</p>
<p>Personally, I have always felt that any time arabs are killing each other and they cannot blame the Jews, that&#8217;s a good thing. And, if there is going to be a war between the Shi&#8217;a and Sunni muslims, which side do we want to take in that mess anyway? We took the moslem side against the Christian Serbs, and there was never a very good reason for that either, and less than stellar results. Kosovo anyone? How did helping moslem killers ever help our position in the world?</p>
<p>Sometimes doing nothing is the best course of action. If the images of killing upset us, how can killing even more people be the right thing to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: used_to_be_a_liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5330164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[used_to_be_a_liberal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5330164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that we are all missing something here, call me nuts, crazy, or insane if you like, but this is what I see. First off, Arab Spring, did not just happen, it was planned, contrived, then executed, by who? by us, in the &quot;west&quot;  Then we were fed a load of bull dung that we swallowed hook line and sinker. Who did we help take out, and why. We took out governments who were actually friendly to wards us, and not so friendly to the Muslim Brotherhood. Why did we do this, well hell, we have done this before. Around 1933, in a country called Germany, we not only backed Hitler, but aided in the build up of his political and military machine. Henry Ford was given a medal by Hitler for giving them the assembly line. Rothschild, Kennedy, Bush, the King of England, Rockefeller, and many others thought Hitler was the greatest thing since sliced bread. So here we go again, along the same path, only this time the plan is more deliberate, in that &quot;we&quot; are creating or trying to create a visible, viable enemy, under the  banner of the Muslim Brotherhood, who, if the plan goes correctly, will rule what we call the whole middle east. Then we will have a brand new enemy to go to war with. This then should solve our economic problem, along with our energy problem. The I M F will be very happy with this scenario, European Governments will be happy as they will now have an excuse to clamp down on Islam in their own countries, and won&#039;t have to worry about screams of intolerance or human rights. Russia, and China will enter on the side against Islam, as they have their own problems with this &quot;religion&quot; , but be prepared, this time they will not leave, or give back. The march to the &quot;New World Order&quot; began in earnest under Bush 1 continued under Clinton, then Bush 2, now Obama, then will continue, and culminate under the next one or two presidents. A &quot;good&quot; war on the horizon by 2020. Am I nuts? maybe, but it seems to me that all these interventions so far have been to benefit the I M F, and in turn us. Will we be fighting a &quot;just&quot; war, sure we will, after all we are being set-up for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that we are all missing something here, call me nuts, crazy, or insane if you like, but this is what I see. First off, Arab Spring, did not just happen, it was planned, contrived, then executed, by who? by us, in the &#8220;west&#8221;  Then we were fed a load of bull dung that we swallowed hook line and sinker. Who did we help take out, and why. We took out governments who were actually friendly to wards us, and not so friendly to the Muslim Brotherhood. Why did we do this, well hell, we have done this before. Around 1933, in a country called Germany, we not only backed Hitler, but aided in the build up of his political and military machine. Henry Ford was given a medal by Hitler for giving them the assembly line. Rothschild, Kennedy, Bush, the King of England, Rockefeller, and many others thought Hitler was the greatest thing since sliced bread. So here we go again, along the same path, only this time the plan is more deliberate, in that &#8220;we&#8221; are creating or trying to create a visible, viable enemy, under the  banner of the Muslim Brotherhood, who, if the plan goes correctly, will rule what we call the whole middle east. Then we will have a brand new enemy to go to war with. This then should solve our economic problem, along with our energy problem. The I M F will be very happy with this scenario, European Governments will be happy as they will now have an excuse to clamp down on Islam in their own countries, and won&#8217;t have to worry about screams of intolerance or human rights. Russia, and China will enter on the side against Islam, as they have their own problems with this &#8220;religion&#8221; , but be prepared, this time they will not leave, or give back. The march to the &#8220;New World Order&#8221; began in earnest under Bush 1 continued under Clinton, then Bush 2, now Obama, then will continue, and culminate under the next one or two presidents. A &#8220;good&#8221; war on the horizon by 2020. Am I nuts? maybe, but it seems to me that all these interventions so far have been to benefit the I M F, and in turn us. Will we be fighting a &#8220;just&#8221; war, sure we will, after all we are being set-up for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Used To Be A Liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5330163</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Used To Be A Liberal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5330163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that we are all missing something here, call me nuts, crazy, or insane if you like, but this is what I see. First off, Arab Spring, did not just happen, it was planned, contrived, then executed, by who? by us, in the &quot;west&quot;  Then we were fed a load of bull dung that we swallowed hook line and sinker. Who did we help take out, and why. We took out governments who were actually friendly to wards us, and not so friendly to the Muslim Brotherhood. Why did we do this, well hell, we have done this before. Around 1933, in a country called Germany, we not only backed Hitler, but aided in the build up of his political and military machine. Henry Ford was given a medal by Hitler for giving them the assembly line. Rothschild, Kennedy, Bush, the King of England, Rockefeller, and many others thought Hitler was the greatest thing since sliced bread. So here we go again, along the same path, only this time the plan is more deliberate, in that &quot;we&quot; are creating or trying to create a visible, viable enemy, under the  banner of the Muslim Brotherhood, who, if the plan goes correctly, will rule what we call the whole middle east. Then we will have a brand new enemy to go to war with. This then should solve our economic problem, along with our energy problem. The I M F will be very happy with this scenario, European Governments will be happy as they will now have an excuse to clamp down on Islam in their own countries, and won&#039;t have to worry about screams of intolerance or human rights. Russia, and China will enter on the side against Islam, as they have their own problems with this &quot;religion&quot; , but be prepared, this time they will not leave, or give back. The march to the &quot;New World Order&quot; began in earnest under Bush 1 continued under Clinton, then Bush 2, now Obama, then will continue, and culminate under the next one or two presidents. A &quot;good&quot; war on the horizon by 2020. Am I nuts? maybe, but it seems to me that all these interventions so far have been to benefit the I M F, and in turn us. Will we be fighting a &quot;just&quot; war, sure we will, after all we are being set-up for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that we are all missing something here, call me nuts, crazy, or insane if you like, but this is what I see. First off, Arab Spring, did not just happen, it was planned, contrived, then executed, by who? by us, in the &#8220;west&#8221;  Then we were fed a load of bull dung that we swallowed hook line and sinker. Who did we help take out, and why. We took out governments who were actually friendly to wards us, and not so friendly to the Muslim Brotherhood. Why did we do this, well hell, we have done this before. Around 1933, in a country called Germany, we not only backed Hitler, but aided in the build up of his political and military machine. Henry Ford was given a medal by Hitler for giving them the assembly line. Rothschild, Kennedy, Bush, the King of England, Rockefeller, and many others thought Hitler was the greatest thing since sliced bread. So here we go again, along the same path, only this time the plan is more deliberate, in that &#8220;we&#8221; are creating or trying to create a visible, viable enemy, under the  banner of the Muslim Brotherhood, who, if the plan goes correctly, will rule what we call the whole middle east. Then we will have a brand new enemy to go to war with. This then should solve our economic problem, along with our energy problem. The I M F will be very happy with this scenario, European Governments will be happy as they will now have an excuse to clamp down on Islam in their own countries, and won&#8217;t have to worry about screams of intolerance or human rights. Russia, and China will enter on the side against Islam, as they have their own problems with this &#8220;religion&#8221; , but be prepared, this time they will not leave, or give back. The march to the &#8220;New World Order&#8221; began in earnest under Bush 1 continued under Clinton, then Bush 2, now Obama, then will continue, and culminate under the next one or two presidents. A &#8220;good&#8221; war on the horizon by 2020. Am I nuts? maybe, but it seems to me that all these interventions so far have been to benefit the I M F, and in turn us. Will we be fighting a &#8220;just&#8221; war, sure we will, after all we are being set-up for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aposematic</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248673</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aposematic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5248673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Silly Me! I thought arming, aiding, and giving comfort to America&#039;s enemies (MB/Al Qaeda/etc.) was treason. I guess when a D POTUS does it its all o.k. since apparently our MSM/Press propaganda pontificators see no evil when D&#039;s are at the helm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly Me! I thought arming, aiding, and giving comfort to America&#8217;s enemies (MB/Al Qaeda/etc.) was treason. I guess when a D POTUS does it its all o.k. since apparently our MSM/Press propaganda pontificators see no evil when D&#8217;s are at the helm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5248668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Follow the money trail, Daniel.  Follow the money trail.  As long as U.S. politicians are permitted to receive direct or indirect political contributions and financial benefits from foreign nations, the interests and concerns of the American people will be secondary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow the money trail, Daniel.  Follow the money trail.  As long as U.S. politicians are permitted to receive direct or indirect political contributions and financial benefits from foreign nations, the interests and concerns of the American people will be secondary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 07:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5248603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The corrupt government in DC needs to go, we need a reset back to following the constitution. And the federal reserve is a major player in the corruption along with wall street.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The corrupt government in DC needs to go, we need a reset back to following the constitution. And the federal reserve is a major player in the corruption along with wall street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Fuslims</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-american-people-vs-american-politicians-on-syria/comment-page-1/#comment-5248601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mick Fuslims]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 07:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=197944#comment-5248601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ONLY group of people abed Hussein-Obama supports are those affiliated with the muslim brotherhood, he&#039;s a treasonous usurper and needs to be treated like one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ONLY group of people abed Hussein-Obama supports are those affiliated with the muslim brotherhood, he&#8217;s a treasonous usurper and needs to be treated like one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 674/691 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 00:46:48 by W3 Total Cache -->