The Darkness of Earth Hour

Forget the World’s Fair, we now have a new way to celebrate human accomplishment. Instead of seeing a vision of the future, we turn off the lights and sit in the dark for an hour.

Earth Hour shows how far we have come from celebrating human accomplishment to celebrating the lack of accomplishment as an accomplishment. For all the pretense of activism, environmentalism celebrates inaction. Don’t build, don’t create and don’t do– are its mandates. Turn off the lights and feel good about how much you aren’t doing right now.

Environmentalism has degenerated into a conviction that all human activity is destructive because the species of man is the greatest threat to the planet and all life on it. Each death, each act of undoing and unmaking, each darkness that is brought about by the cessation of humanity becomes a profoundly environmentalist activity.

Kill yourself and save the planet. Put out the lights, tear down the city and let the earth revert to some imaginary primeval paradise free of all pollution; whether it is the carbon breath of men, dogs and cows or the light pollution of their cities.

Embrace the darkness.

While we take electric light for granted– being able to read and write after dark is a technological achievement that transformed our civilization. Animals are governed by day and night cycles. Artificial light made it possible for us to work independently of the day and night cycle.

During the recent extended blackout after Hurricane Sandy, some of us had a brief period of reverting to a pre-technological civilization in which work was governed by day and night cycles. And that was a reminder that there is no way to measure the increase in knowledge gained from the conquest of the darkness. There is no better measure of the unthinking contempt of the environmentalist movement for that achievement than a call to turn off the lights and sit in the dark.

Like all environmental gimmicks, Earth Hour is perverse and hypocritical. Far more energy is consumed promoting it, then is saved by practicing it.

Websites switch to black, even though displaying black on television sets or monitors consumes more energy. Turning off electricity to entire buildings after working hours and then turning it on costs more than letting it run. And getting 90 million people across the country to turn their power on and off at a scheduled time is an energy savings disaster. And since power companies draw down on their more expensive ‘green’ generators first, Earth Hour actually shuts down ‘green’ power.

But its sponsors don’t claim that Earth Hour saves energy or prevents us from polluting the globe. Like every environmentalist stunt from flying rock stars around the world on jet planes to carving thousands of statues made of ice and then leaving them to melt in a public square, Earth Hour is meant to spread awareness.

Spreading awareness is the sole purpose of most environmental activism. Awareness spreading doesn’t make anything better, but makes people feel guilty, outraged, hopeful or some combination of the appropriate political sentiments in the face of an imminent armageddon that can only be fought by convincing everyone to be deeply concerned by it and disdainful of everyone who stands outside their Chicken Little consensus.

The WWF, Earth Hour’s godmother, has learned that shrill attention seeking is a reliable fundraising method. One of the WWF’s more memorable fundraising methods was an ad that showed hundreds of planes headed toward the World Trade Center, to highlight just how much more important their work is than fighting terrorism. Franny Armstrong of Age of Stupid, which was promoted by the WWF, ran a 10:10 campaign in the UK, whose ads featured environmentalists murdering dissenters, including a group of schoolchildren. The ads are just ads, but London’s leftist former mayor, Ken Livingstone had said of Age of Stupid, “Every single person in the country should be forcibly sat down on a chair and made to watch this film.”

That is the dark side of environmentalism. The most active non-Muslim domestic terrorist group is environmental. The undercurrent of violence finds easy purchase in environmentalism’s creed that the only real problem with the world is people. No amount of turning off the lights is enough. Eventually you come around to having to turn off the people.

The Nazis were among the most enthusiastic environmentalists of their day, even the term ‘Ecology’ was coined by Ernst Haeckel, whose racial views served as precursors to Nazi eugenics. But while Nazi environmentalist believed that we were all animals, they insisted that some animals were better than others. Modern environmentalists believe that we are all worse than animals. In their view we are both natural and unnatural. Natural because we come from the ape and unnatural because we are intelligent. We live on the planet, but our intelligence excludes us from ever belonging to it.

The incompatibility of productive man with the natural world is a fundamental tenet of the environmental movement. Everything we do is destructive, because of what we are. We are tool builders, inventors and producers. And the environmentalist movement is aimed at convincing us to stop being these things. To turn off the lights, make do with less and march back to the caves with a few clever ad campaigns and a catchy tune.

Zero Population campaigns and calls for mandatory one-child families are the eugenics of environmentalism. The old eugenicists were concerned with improving the human breed by promoting the reproduction of some, and preventing the reproduction of others. Environmental eugenics treats all of mankind as an inferior race. We all must die.

Not only mankind must go, but all the animals that man has domesticated and bred– cows, dogs and cats. That is why PETA kills thousands of dogs and cats a year, promotes the euthanasia of wild cats and pet spaying and its staffers have even been known to kidnap animals and then kill them. It is why the Global Warming crowd has made cow emissions into their whipping bovine.

It’s not enough to kill man, tear down his cities and put out his lights. His cats and dogs and his cows and sheep must also die.

Environmentalism is not motivated by a love for all creatures, but by preference for a prehuman world of natural wilderness uncultivated by man. The political leftist romanticizes the noble savage over the civilized man and its environmentalist arm romanticizes the jungle over the thousand acre farm. It prefers the the swamp to the garden, the wolf to the dog, and the tiger to the house cat.

This preference is not scientific, it is emotional, rooted in an antipathy to industrialization and human development. It wraps itself in the cloak of science, but it is a reactionary longing for a romanticized past that never existed.

In the environmental bible– man is the source of all evil. The transition from the nomadic to the domestic, the village to the city, and the craftsman to the factory, is its version of original sin.

The environmentalist began with a distaste for human civilization and the fetishization of the rural farm life of the peasant. The champions of this “naturalism” were invariably urban artists and writers from the upper classes who were enthusiastic about being in touch with nature. After them came the “Nature Fakers” crafting myths about the high moral standards of wild animals. Domestic animals in such stories were always wicked and dumb, while wild animals lived deep and spiritual lives out in the woods. And so the animal kingdom was subdivided into the noble savage and the uncle tom.

The world was divided into two polar opposites, the green and the gray, in an apocalyptic struggle. Either man would drown the world in industry, or he would return to a natural way of life through a lethal virus (Mary Shelley, The Last Man, 1826), a devastating war (H.G. Wells), oppressive social policies (Edward Bellamy) or eco-terrorism (The Monkey Wrench Gang). The more civilization grew, the more apocalyptic the scenarios became culminating in the two great environmental myths; nuclear winter and global warming. These apocalyptic myths have served the same purpose for environmentalists as apocalypses do for all religions. They predict a time when the sinful order is overturned and the earth is renewed to make way for the faithful.

Man is the environmentalist’s devil. He must be beaten, broken and subjugated. Even the animals he has bred, who are the spark of his genius, must be taken out and killed. Take away his food and his power. Blame him for the natural cycles of the planet and the inevitable extinction of species that goes on whether he is there or not. Take away his technology and his inventions. Tell him that the humblest bacteria is better than him, for it is dumb and follows its natural instincts, while he insists on using his mind. Take away his primacy and his learning. And then leave him in the dark.

The environmental movement is tenacious, fanatical and deceptive. Its creed is the undoing of all human progress. There is money to be made from that, as there is in all revolutions, but beneath the inconveniences of living under an environmental regime, from dirty clothes to high taxes, while being forced to listen to the hypocrisies and false pieties of the Gorean clergy of environmentalist activists heating their mansions while the poor freeze in energy poverty, is the darker reality that environmentalism is an anti-human movement with a vicious hostility toward man and the civilization he has built. Whatever he has built, it must destroy.

The gap between darkness and light is a profound symbol in every civilization. The light of knowledge pitted against the shadowy dark of ignorance. The light reveals, but the darkness hides.

Civilization and the moral code exist in the light of awareness, but the darkness is home to unthinking bestial things. To call for a return to the darkness is a profound act of symbolism. A civilization that celebrates a return to the darkness for even a single hour is longing for a return to a deeper state of darkness. A darkness of the soul.

  • Softly Bob

    Daniel, a good article although you forgot to add one thing: These environmentalists are not entirely suicidal. Although they believe that humans are evil and want to destroy mankind, they don't include themselves in that. Their hypocrisy is such that they believe themselves to be a special case.
    They dream of a future where only 'bad' humans are exterminated (bad=capitalist, free-thinking, pioneering etc.) and they themselves are masters of the planet, living in and ruling over some kind of ecological utopia. It's the only way that they could ever have any power.
    If 99% of the World's population were exterminated then they themselves, the laziest and most deluded of all, would finally have the upper hand.

    • JoeKidd

      This article is worth sharing… "Earth Hour: A Dissent" — Ross McKitrick: "Abundant, cheap electricity has been the greatest source of human liberation in the 20th century."

      Also this, from Doug Ross: "DEMOCRATS' UTOPIA AS SEEN FROM SPACE: 1992 and 2010"

      I found this Daniel Greenfield quote devastating: "No amount of turning off the lights is enough. Eventually you come around to having to turn off the people."

      It reminded me of another quote, this one from Heinrich Heine: "Dort wo man Bücher verbrennt, verbrennt man auch am Ende Menschen."

      Translation: "Wherever they burn books, they will also burn people at the end."

  • Toni_Pereira

    Superb article,Daniel!I wonder why people who are always shouting for a new enlightenment end up endorsing these views that are deeply anti-enlightenment?

  • AdinaK

    Eco fantasists are in sync with all kinds of human "elimination", & IF they had their druthers they would "select" who is allowed to benefit from this or that, but not before millions are disposed of –

    Adina Kutnicki, Israel

  • SuicidePrevention

    You wrote: Blame him (Man) for the natural cycles of the planet and the inevitable extinction of species that goes on whether he is there or not. Care to elaborate?

    • jakespoon

      Species come and species go. Example: Man didn't kill off the dinosaurs ,nature did. Happens all the time,if we had never been created,it would still happen. Conditions change that aren't conducive to certain forms of life, and poof,they're gone.

    • Paul of Alexandria

      There is a wishful fantasy that the world is static, that the way that is is now is the way that it always was and will be. In reality, continents move, the Sun waxes and wanes, asteroids and comets impact, and volcanoes wreak havoc. 99% of all species that have ever existed died before humanity ever existed. 100,000 years ago a large chunk of the earth was covered by ice, a few million years before that even Antarctica was warm enough for dinosaurs and trees.

  • Dale

    Isn't it funny that, just like Islamic terrorist leaders, leaders of this movement hold signs telling others to commit suicide but do not, themselves, do it. If these people truly believed what they say then there'd be no one to hold their signs. They want you and me to sacrifice our lives to give them their vision of utopia.

  • UCSPanther

    I wish I could have celebrated earth hour my way: By firing up a 1979 cat D6D and knocking over a few trees

  • Toni_Pereira

    I just killed 11/12 trees with this post, and i'm proud of it!

    According to french writer Pascal Bruckner, Eco-freakishness is the new marxism and the planet the new proletariat :

  • @quark1912

    I celebrated Earth Hour by turning on all my lights, watching TV and recharging my cell phone & IPad.

    • Toni_Pereira

      Couldn't you turn on the heat,too?

  • jakespoon

    These"people" operate under the assumption that man is alien to this planet. We were created here and every thing we do comes from our nature. A dam on a river that makes power to run our society is as natural as a beaver pond that provides food and shelter for beavers and other creatures, a sky scraper is as natural as a bee-hive. While we were made to use the resources of this planet,we should also be good stewards. No one in their right mind wants dirty air or poison water, and any one that believes we do is an idiot. An ideology that puts animal lives on par or better than human life is insane and satanic.

  • Paul of Alexandria

    "This preference is not scientific, " It's Satanic.

  • Lady_Dr

    Death to Rousseau and his minions!

  • ACL – A Voice for Values

    Hey, I think your site might be having browser compatibility
    issues. When I look at your website in Ie, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping.
    I just wanted to give you a quick heads up! Other then that, excellent blog!