<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Deconstruction of Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-deconstruction-of-marriage</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 22:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: TheTruth12123</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-5290501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheTruth12123]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-5290501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[another propaganda article from the far right that paints the left as anti americans give it up no one with a brain is falling for your crap]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another propaganda article from the far right that paints the left as anti americans give it up no one with a brain is falling for your crap</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grace</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4937356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 01:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4937356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are deluding yourself.  Same sex marriage is not about two people being permanently &amp; exclusively committed to each other as it is with real marriage.  Research done to answer the question as to why so few homosexuals marry in countries where it has been made legal revealed that they have no interest in marriage - and even those who marry did not decrease their promiscuous behaviors as they largely do not believe in monogamous relationships.  Dr. Greenfield is correct - the battle for marriage is about eliminating all traditional gender normative aspects of society.  Google Professor Judith Stacey and get it straight from the other side (no pun intended, lol!)... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are deluding yourself.  Same sex marriage is not about two people being permanently &amp; exclusively committed to each other as it is with real marriage.  Research done to answer the question as to why so few homosexuals marry in countries where it has been made legal revealed that they have no interest in marriage &#8211; and even those who marry did not decrease their promiscuous behaviors as they largely do not believe in monogamous relationships.  Dr. Greenfield is correct &#8211; the battle for marriage is about eliminating all traditional gender normative aspects of society.  Google Professor Judith Stacey and get it straight from the other side (no pun intended, lol!)&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4433907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 17:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4433907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s interesting, FK, is your&#039;s, Patron&#039;s and others&#039; focus on the sex acts between gays, rather than the whole relationship.  It&#039;s so child-like, your concern with the &quot;ick!&quot; factor.     
 
I remember when my cousin (who is actually gay!) and I met my mother and aunt&#039;s cousins, middle aged men at the time, who were raging queens.  We were 12 years old, and totally freaked about by gay people, because we could only think of them in terms of having sex with each other.  But what does one expect of 12 year old boys in the &#039;70s?   
 
It so happened those two men had one of the most solid, fulfilling, loving, complete &quot;marriages&quot; anyone could ask for, but were entirely denied a lot of the basic rights which go along with marriage.  It took me to grow up to recognize what they had, and overlook the &quot;ick&quot; factor.   
 
Perhaps its time to grow up, FK?     ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#039;s interesting, FK, is your&#039;s, Patron&#039;s and others&#039; focus on the sex acts between gays, rather than the whole relationship.  It&#039;s so child-like, your concern with the &quot;ick!&quot; factor.     </p>
<p>I remember when my cousin (who is actually gay!) and I met my mother and aunt&#039;s cousins, middle aged men at the time, who were raging queens.  We were 12 years old, and totally freaked about by gay people, because we could only think of them in terms of having sex with each other.  But what does one expect of 12 year old boys in the &#039;70s?   </p>
<p>It so happened those two men had one of the most solid, fulfilling, loving, complete &quot;marriages&quot; anyone could ask for, but were entirely denied a lot of the basic rights which go along with marriage.  It took me to grow up to recognize what they had, and overlook the &quot;ick&quot; factor.   </p>
<p>Perhaps its time to grow up, FK?     </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4433894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 17:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4433894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadly for Danny Greenfield, I think he&#039;s just too frightened, in general.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly for Danny Greenfield, I think he&#039;s just too frightened, in general.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4433883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 17:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4433883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Who cares if two homosexuals pledge to commit sodomy exclusively with each other? Their behavior is still an aberration.&quot; 
 
Gay relationships are no more or less about sex than heterosexual ones are.  And though homosexuality is not the &quot;norm,&quot; it is not &quot;aberrant.&quot;  It&#039;s a biological reality, and God doesn&#039;t make mistakes.     
 
&quot;... they want the government and society to recognize something that is not true: that their couplings are as meaningful and as important as the marriage of one man and one woman.&quot; 
 
But they are just as meaningful and important to society, and full marriage commitment strengthens your community as much as straight marriage does.   
 
&quot;That type of marriage--the only real marriage--is the arrangement best capable of generating and raising healthy children.&quot; 
 
Get back to me when you&#039;re ready to restrict marriage to those couples only willing and able to make children.   
 
&quot;...rotten, abnormal, and destructive.&quot;  
 
I genuinely feel sorry for you.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Who cares if two homosexuals pledge to commit sodomy exclusively with each other? Their behavior is still an aberration.&quot; </p>
<p>Gay relationships are no more or less about sex than heterosexual ones are.  And though homosexuality is not the &quot;norm,&quot; it is not &quot;aberrant.&quot;  It&#039;s a biological reality, and God doesn&#039;t make mistakes.     </p>
<p>&quot;&#8230; they want the government and society to recognize something that is not true: that their couplings are as meaningful and as important as the marriage of one man and one woman.&quot; </p>
<p>But they are just as meaningful and important to society, and full marriage commitment strengthens your community as much as straight marriage does.   </p>
<p>&quot;That type of marriage&#8211;the only real marriage&#8211;is the arrangement best capable of generating and raising healthy children.&quot; </p>
<p>Get back to me when you&#039;re ready to restrict marriage to those couples only willing and able to make children.   </p>
<p>&quot;&#8230;rotten, abnormal, and destructive.&quot;  </p>
<p>I genuinely feel sorry for you.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4433864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 17:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4433864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Marriage is exactly about raising children.&quot; 
 
But surely you are not suggesting we deny the right of elderly or infertile couples with no ability or desire to raise children the right to marry.   
 
Strike one! 
 
&quot;The &quot;damages&quot; homosexuals claim are based on their exclusion from benefits which are intended for two people who have created a child together.&quot; 
 
Nope.  The rights of property transfer, inheritance upon death, tax breaks, shared health benefits, rights to be involved in end of life care decisions, etc., have absolutely nothing to do with children.  
 
Strike two! 
 
&quot;...Because they do not get to pick an arbitrary foreigner to become a citizen or an heir, and two homosexuals do, is they federal government damaging celibates?&quot; 
 
No, because there is nothing &quot;arbitrary&quot; about a gay person wanting to bring his/her spouse to the US from a foreign country.  It the very same marriage commitment that allows heterosexual Americans to bring their spouses to America from foreign countries.   
 
Strike three, you&#039;re out! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Marriage is exactly about raising children.&quot; </p>
<p>But surely you are not suggesting we deny the right of elderly or infertile couples with no ability or desire to raise children the right to marry.   </p>
<p>Strike one! </p>
<p>&quot;The &quot;damages&quot; homosexuals claim are based on their exclusion from benefits which are intended for two people who have created a child together.&quot; </p>
<p>Nope.  The rights of property transfer, inheritance upon death, tax breaks, shared health benefits, rights to be involved in end of life care decisions, etc., have absolutely nothing to do with children.  </p>
<p>Strike two! </p>
<p>&quot;&#8230;Because they do not get to pick an arbitrary foreigner to become a citizen or an heir, and two homosexuals do, is they federal government damaging celibates?&quot; </p>
<p>No, because there is nothing &quot;arbitrary&quot; about a gay person wanting to bring his/her spouse to the US from a foreign country.  It the very same marriage commitment that allows heterosexual Americans to bring their spouses to America from foreign countries.   </p>
<p>Strike three, you&#039;re out! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4433836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 17:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4433836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your bizarre post is simply proof that you see everything in terms of partsan political warfare.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your bizarre post is simply proof that you see everything in terms of partsan political warfare.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F.K. Juliano</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4425822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[F.K. Juliano]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 02:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4425822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who cares if two homosexuals pledge to commit sodomy exclusively with each other? Their behavior is still an aberration. That having been said, no one is proposing to deny them the right to do as they wish. However, what they want is a legal and social endorsement of that behavior. In effect, they want the government and society to recognize something that is not true: that their couplings are as meaningful and as important as the marriage of one man and one woman. That type of marriage--the only real marriage--is the arrangement best capable of generating and raising healthy children. That is why leftists are intent on attacking it. It&#039;s not a conspiracy; it&#039;s their inescapable attraction to everything that&#039;s rotten, abnormal, and destructive. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares if two homosexuals pledge to commit sodomy exclusively with each other? Their behavior is still an aberration. That having been said, no one is proposing to deny them the right to do as they wish. However, what they want is a legal and social endorsement of that behavior. In effect, they want the government and society to recognize something that is not true: that their couplings are as meaningful and as important as the marriage of one man and one woman. That type of marriage&#8211;the only real marriage&#8211;is the arrangement best capable of generating and raising healthy children. That is why leftists are intent on attacking it. It&#039;s not a conspiracy; it&#039;s their inescapable attraction to everything that&#039;s rotten, abnormal, and destructive. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patron</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4422499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 02:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4422499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marriage is exactly about raising children. The &quot;damages&quot; homosexuals claim are based on their exclusion from benefits which are intended for two people who have created a child together. 
 
Discrimination lawsuits against churches from a Supreme Court ruling affirming homosexual marriage will definitely impact traditional marriage. 
 
If your point holds true, we should grant federal marriage benefits like preferred immigration status and tax breaks to celibates and the asexual. Because they do not get to pick an arbitrary foreigner to become a citizen or an heir, and two homosexuals do, is they federal government damaging celibates? Expect debates more ridiculous than this one due to Obama&#039;s newest scheme to distract from the bankrupting of America. 
 
We are quickly becoming the world where every assertion is perjury and every identity is a lie, Dante&#039;s lowest Maelbolge of the 8th layer of hell, where the fraudulent suffer the evils of their own making. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marriage is exactly about raising children. The &quot;damages&quot; homosexuals claim are based on their exclusion from benefits which are intended for two people who have created a child together. </p>
<p>Discrimination lawsuits against churches from a Supreme Court ruling affirming homosexual marriage will definitely impact traditional marriage. </p>
<p>If your point holds true, we should grant federal marriage benefits like preferred immigration status and tax breaks to celibates and the asexual. Because they do not get to pick an arbitrary foreigner to become a citizen or an heir, and two homosexuals do, is they federal government damaging celibates? Expect debates more ridiculous than this one due to Obama&#039;s newest scheme to distract from the bankrupting of America. </p>
<p>We are quickly becoming the world where every assertion is perjury and every identity is a lie, Dante&#039;s lowest Maelbolge of the 8th layer of hell, where the fraudulent suffer the evils of their own making. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patron</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4422463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 01:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4422463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have been brainwashed by the Democratic&#039;s pathetic attempt to reclaim their civil rights glory days because they have spent us into economic ruin. Patty Murray, Harry Reid, Charles Schummer and Nancy Pelosi are happier than pigs in slop, sitting in DC winning votes by politically destroying anyone trying to stop the rapidly approaching economic armageddon. 
 
Do we stop giving millionaire drug dealers foodstamps, welfare and medicaid? Nope. 
Do we shut down the trial lawyer gravy train which has ballooned US healthcare cost? Nope. 
Do we stop giving millions of disability fraudsters $1,000 a month? Nope. 
Do we bring an end to the corporatism which gives the K Street client with the best Lamborghini billions? Never. 
 
If you are Former ACORN Lawyer Barak Obama, you pander on divisive issues for political advantage, awarding approval only  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have been brainwashed by the Democratic&#039;s pathetic attempt to reclaim their civil rights glory days because they have spent us into economic ruin. Patty Murray, Harry Reid, Charles Schummer and Nancy Pelosi are happier than pigs in slop, sitting in DC winning votes by politically destroying anyone trying to stop the rapidly approaching economic armageddon. </p>
<p>Do we stop giving millionaire drug dealers foodstamps, welfare and medicaid? Nope.<br />
Do we shut down the trial lawyer gravy train which has ballooned US healthcare cost? Nope.<br />
Do we stop giving millions of disability fraudsters $1,000 a month? Nope.<br />
Do we bring an end to the corporatism which gives the K Street client with the best Lamborghini billions? Never. </p>
<p>If you are Former ACORN Lawyer Barak Obama, you pander on divisive issues for political advantage, awarding approval only  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qalb-Al-Assad</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4421858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Qalb-Al-Assad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 20:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4421858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m surprised Dave (Horowitz) would allow this kind of drivel on his website, with the world full of Islamofascists killing &amp; raping kuffar we&#039;re worried about Gay marriage, I can&#039;t believe it, let the queers get married for God&#039;s sak, we have real threats to address.. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m surprised Dave (Horowitz) would allow this kind of drivel on his website, with the world full of Islamofascists killing &amp; raping kuffar we&#039;re worried about Gay marriage, I can&#039;t believe it, let the queers get married for God&#039;s sak, we have real threats to address.. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4421749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 20:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4421749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kudos to Chuck and EarlyBird for cutting through Greenfield&#039;s BS to get at the core of the matter.  It is sad though that Greenfield sees his marriage or prospective marriage (not to mention the whole of western civilization) as somehow endangered by allowing gays to marry, stating that it&#039;s &quot;hard to maintain a marriage if the idea no longer exists&quot; because gays are marrying.  It must be an incredibly fearful and depressing way of life to think that way, to see others&#039; happiness as &quot;deconstructing&quot; something sacred to you (when Greenfield finds a new word he likes, he certainly milks it, doesn&#039;t he?), rather than simply enjoy the love and commitment that marriage offers to those of us lucky enough to have found someone with whom we can share our lives.  I sincerely hope Greenfield one day stops obsessing about &quot;deconstruction&quot; and the approaching end of marriage and western civilization and finds happiness with someone.  Somehow though, I don&#039;t think he will. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to Chuck and EarlyBird for cutting through Greenfield&#039;s BS to get at the core of the matter.  It is sad though that Greenfield sees his marriage or prospective marriage (not to mention the whole of western civilization) as somehow endangered by allowing gays to marry, stating that it&#039;s &quot;hard to maintain a marriage if the idea no longer exists&quot; because gays are marrying.  It must be an incredibly fearful and depressing way of life to think that way, to see others&#039; happiness as &quot;deconstructing&quot; something sacred to you (when Greenfield finds a new word he likes, he certainly milks it, doesn&#039;t he?), rather than simply enjoy the love and commitment that marriage offers to those of us lucky enough to have found someone with whom we can share our lives.  I sincerely hope Greenfield one day stops obsessing about &quot;deconstruction&quot; and the approaching end of marriage and western civilization and finds happiness with someone.  Somehow though, I don&#039;t think he will. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4421659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4421659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The &quot;zero threat&quot; that gay marriage zealots aver is not posed to marriage of the Genesis One type is one of their biggest lies. The threat is real and is already engulfing us on so many fronts.&quot; 
 
How so, Jeff?  Really, please illustrate for us how if a gay married couple moves next door to you, it impacts you and your wife&#039;s marriage.  I want to know.  And sorry, but just referring to the Bible doesn&#039;t cut it.     
 
I am more concerned by far with hetero marriages that are gone into lightly, or people choosing to shack up instead, or by granting gays civil unions, thereby offering everyone a &quot;Marriage Lite&quot; option.    ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;The &quot;zero threat&quot; that gay marriage zealots aver is not posed to marriage of the Genesis One type is one of their biggest lies. The threat is real and is already engulfing us on so many fronts.&quot; </p>
<p>How so, Jeff?  Really, please illustrate for us how if a gay married couple moves next door to you, it impacts you and your wife&#039;s marriage.  I want to know.  And sorry, but just referring to the Bible doesn&#039;t cut it.     </p>
<p>I am more concerned by far with hetero marriages that are gone into lightly, or people choosing to shack up instead, or by granting gays civil unions, thereby offering everyone a &quot;Marriage Lite&quot; option.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Long</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4421653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Long]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4421653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Greenfield,  A brilliant piece which opens up with unusual clarity for the reader a view of the deconstruction process as the communist (and mostly homosexuals) vanguard of the Frankfurt School, et al., envisioned would unfold as it &quot;transformed&quot; all of society, especially in the Christian West their most formidable foe. It has been hard for them however as the Bible is if anything a solid anchor for defining in absolute terms those institutions of especial interest to God and His followers. The &quot;zero threat&quot; that gay marriage zealots aver is not posed to marriage of the Genesis One type is one of their biggest lies. The threat is real and is already engulfing us on so many fronts. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Greenfield,  A brilliant piece which opens up with unusual clarity for the reader a view of the deconstruction process as the communist (and mostly homosexuals) vanguard of the Frankfurt School, et al., envisioned would unfold as it &quot;transformed&quot; all of society, especially in the Christian West their most formidable foe. It has been hard for them however as the Bible is if anything a solid anchor for defining in absolute terms those institutions of especial interest to God and His followers. The &quot;zero threat&quot; that gay marriage zealots aver is not posed to marriage of the Genesis One type is one of their biggest lies. The threat is real and is already engulfing us on so many fronts. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4421525</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 18:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4421525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How sad.  How ridiculous.  What a terrifying world yours must be that everything Good in the world is constantly under assault by Evil Leftist Conspiracies.   
 
You make ZERO sense.  I would be thrilled to read any attempt by you to actually argue the issue in a sane fashion.  Have you even bothered to consider the arguments?   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How sad.  How ridiculous.  What a terrifying world yours must be that everything Good in the world is constantly under assault by Evil Leftist Conspiracies.   </p>
<p>You make ZERO sense.  I would be thrilled to read any attempt by you to actually argue the issue in a sane fashion.  Have you even bothered to consider the arguments?   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4421521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 18:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4421521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are 100% correct, Chuck! 
 
I admit that just 10 or so years ago I too saw gay marriage as a radical political act, not a genuine personal commitment to marriage.  I said, &quot;Are you kidding me?  What&#039;s next?!&quot;  When seen purely as another battle in the culture war, it looks radical.   
 
But it&#039;s not.  Gays are not demanding the right to have anonymous sex in bath houses, but to have serious, committed, deep and socially sanctioned marriage.  It&#039;s the most conservative thing someone can want. And simple &quot;civil unions&quot; are not the same as marriage, as any married couple understands.   
 
I am not only for the right for gays to marry; I&#039;d like to see a lot more gay couples do so.     ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are 100% correct, Chuck! </p>
<p>I admit that just 10 or so years ago I too saw gay marriage as a radical political act, not a genuine personal commitment to marriage.  I said, &quot;Are you kidding me?  What&#039;s next?!&quot;  When seen purely as another battle in the culture war, it looks radical.   </p>
<p>But it&#039;s not.  Gays are not demanding the right to have anonymous sex in bath houses, but to have serious, committed, deep and socially sanctioned marriage.  It&#039;s the most conservative thing someone can want. And simple &quot;civil unions&quot; are not the same as marriage, as any married couple understands.   </p>
<p>I am not only for the right for gays to marry; I&#039;d like to see a lot more gay couples do so.     </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4421423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4421423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sympathetic to Greenfield&#039;s take on gay marriage, the exact one I used to share 10 or so years ago.  It seemed as if just one more definition which the left couldn&#039;t tolerate had to be smashed in the name of radical &quot;equality.&quot;   
 
But I&#039;ve come around, basically because in that time period I&#039;ve made some very close relationships with gay couples, who are as serious and committed to each other as my wife and I are, and as boring and conservative as we are, who want to make a very mainstream life.  I&#039;ve realized it is not a fad or a campaign for deconstruction, but for inclusion in the most important social institution we have.   
 
Knowing gay people and is how conservatives like Portman and Cheney, can see the desire for marriage equality as a noble campaign, not an act of social vandalism.  There is zero threat to the institution of marriage, in fact, it is a celebration of it.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m sympathetic to Greenfield&#039;s take on gay marriage, the exact one I used to share 10 or so years ago.  It seemed as if just one more definition which the left couldn&#039;t tolerate had to be smashed in the name of radical &quot;equality.&quot;   </p>
<p>But I&#039;ve come around, basically because in that time period I&#039;ve made some very close relationships with gay couples, who are as serious and committed to each other as my wife and I are, and as boring and conservative as we are, who want to make a very mainstream life.  I&#039;ve realized it is not a fad or a campaign for deconstruction, but for inclusion in the most important social institution we have.   </p>
<p>Knowing gay people and is how conservatives like Portman and Cheney, can see the desire for marriage equality as a noble campaign, not an act of social vandalism.  There is zero threat to the institution of marriage, in fact, it is a celebration of it.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ar&#039;nun</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4421401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ar&#039;nun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4421401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The deconstruction of marriage is all part of the Sol Alinsky program along with the deconstruction of the Constitution. They fight against freedom of speech, freedom of self preservation and any other individualistic freedom.  
 
A healthy marriage isn&#039;t imortant to a Collectivist utopia because there, &quot;it takes a village&quot; I really do emplore anyone who hasn&#039;t read Hillary&#039;s book to give it a try. You may have to replace a few windows after attempting to throw it out of them, but it is important to know what our enemies think. She willl be running in 2016 with Mark the Sealion killer Kelly as her VP. (just my prediction) And this is what is in store from our society if she is successful.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deconstruction of marriage is all part of the Sol Alinsky program along with the deconstruction of the Constitution. They fight against freedom of speech, freedom of self preservation and any other individualistic freedom.  </p>
<p>A healthy marriage isn&#039;t imortant to a Collectivist utopia because there, &quot;it takes a village&quot; I really do emplore anyone who hasn&#039;t read Hillary&#039;s book to give it a try. You may have to replace a few windows after attempting to throw it out of them, but it is important to know what our enemies think. She willl be running in 2016 with Mark the Sealion killer Kelly as her VP. (just my prediction) And this is what is in store from our society if she is successful.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Anziulewicz</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-deconstruction-of-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-4421380</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Anziulewicz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=183437#comment-4421380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a bunch or hysterical nonsense. 
 
Ask any Straight couple why they choose to marry. Their answer will not be, &#8220;We want to get married so that we can have sex and make babies!&#8221; That would be absurd. The reason couples choose to marry is to make a solemn declaration before friends and family members that they wish to make a commitment to one another&#8217;s happiness, health, and well-being, to the exclusion of all others. Those friends and family members will subsequently act as a force of encouragement for that couple to hold fast to their vows. 
 
THAT&#8217;S what makes marriage a good thing, whether the couple in question is Straight OR Gay. It looks like American voters are starting to accept that. 
 
But let me reassure you: For Straight couples, absolutely nothing is happening to &quot;traditional marriage.&quot; Nothing is being &quot;redefined.&quot; Straight couples will continue to date, get engaged, marry, and build lives and families together as they always have. None of that will be remotely affected whether (or not) Gay couples are allowed to do the same.  
 
Conversely, allowing Gay couples to marry will have ZERO impact on the number of Straight couples who divorce, have children out of wedlock, or give up unwanted children for adoption. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bunch or hysterical nonsense. </p>
<p>Ask any Straight couple why they choose to marry. Their answer will not be, &ldquo;We want to get married so that we can have sex and make babies!&rdquo; That would be absurd. The reason couples choose to marry is to make a solemn declaration before friends and family members that they wish to make a commitment to one another&rsquo;s happiness, health, and well-being, to the exclusion of all others. Those friends and family members will subsequently act as a force of encouragement for that couple to hold fast to their vows. </p>
<p>THAT&rsquo;S what makes marriage a good thing, whether the couple in question is Straight OR Gay. It looks like American voters are starting to accept that. </p>
<p>But let me reassure you: For Straight couples, absolutely nothing is happening to &quot;traditional marriage.&quot; Nothing is being &quot;redefined.&quot; Straight couples will continue to date, get engaged, marry, and build lives and families together as they always have. None of that will be remotely affected whether (or not) Gay couples are allowed to do the same.  </p>
<p>Conversely, allowing Gay couples to marry will have ZERO impact on the number of Straight couples who divorce, have children out of wedlock, or give up unwanted children for adoption. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 677/703 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 17:16:46 by W3 Total Cache -->