The Democratic Party vs. Barack Obama

DNCObamaWhen Obama decided to turn his campaign into a permanent Super PAC, he was stabbing the Democratic Party in the back. But he was doing it to them before they did it to him.

Organizing for America gave him an independent source of power and influence at the expense of the Democratic Party. Obama was carelessly draining money and energy out of his own party because whatever common interests he had with a political party, that for all its leftward swing was still too conservative for his taste, were about to be fractured during his second term.

The Democratic Party might have been satisfied if he had retained his 2008 halo in 2015. But that was never going to happen. No matter how much the media slobbers over a politician, the voting public, at least those parts of it that don’t have Hope posters and Obama holograms hanging on their walls, eventually needs a break and someone to blame.

Even vice presidents turn on their own presidents once they begin running for office. Gore tried running as the antithesis of Bill Clinton at a time when everyone had grown sick of him and his scandals. Gore was just a less successful and even more hypocritical version of Bill Clinton; but the Democratic Party tried to build him an image as a stiff and serious fellow who spent a lot of time deep in thought and might be awkward at parties; but wouldn’t cheat on the entire country.

The Democratic Party already has an Anti-Obama in waiting. Hillary claims to be experienced where Obama was inexperienced and savvier about the practical details of getting things done.

The “Ready for Hillary” image is as phony as Gore’s serious ethical look; but it’s also a shot across Obama’s bow telling him that he’s going under the bus before the next election. With OFA, Obama, whose allegiance has always been to the left, not to anything as reactionary as an American political party, decided to throw them under the bus first.

Obama’s biggest asset is still the media, but there’s a reason he never trusted his biggest fans, locked them up in closets, avoided conferences and even set up his own photographers.

He knew that the time would come when the media would turn on him. When the halo photos would make way for pictures that make him look old and tired. When the same columnists who were talking him up as the great hope of the nation would turn to writing pieces about how he failed and why Hillary is the right woman to take his place.

The media won’t step forward to destroy Obama. But they will pile on him once it helps Hillary.

The ObamaCare crisis killed any hope of an enduring truce with the Democratic Party. Obama has been politically weakened now and there’s blood in the water.

ObamaCare has shown that the Prince of Chicago is mortal and that like all politicians he will fall. He will not remain an undying JFK stepping forward into the pages of history. Instead he will be shoved aside to make way for a successor while the men and women who once lionized him shake their heads.

In time he will emerge again, the way that Carter and Clinton have, as an elder statesman. But not in 2016.

The split between the Democratic Party and its leftist hijackers was always bound to happen. The interests that aligned them were nakedly political. The left wanted to push its agenda through and the Democrats would have adopted any tactic to win. The Democratic Party is ready to move on; but the left isn’t done pushing through its agenda.

The collapse of ObamaCare may be a disaster for the Democratic Party in the short term; but it’s also an opportunity in the long term.

There’s not much else that Hillary Clinton can run on in 2016 except health care. Foreign policy interest among Americans is at an all time low which takes her time as Secretary of State off the table. That just leaves the economy; an unpredictable topic to build an election campaign around for a race years into the future.

The rebirth of HillaryCare demands the destruction of ObamaCare. For Hillary to be able to return to her core issue in 2016; she has to take away Obama’s biggest legislative achievement. The problems with ObamaCare may be a nuclear bomb for the Democrats in 2014; but a gift-wrapped package for Hillary in 2016.

If Obama were a team player, he might grit his teeth and take one for the team. But he isn’t. OFA was just the latest demonstration that he owes no allegiance to the Democratic Party and that the awkward marriage of Chicago community organizers, lefty billionaires and the turgid ranks of the Democratic Party swollen with living fossils like Harry Reid was bound to end sometime.

The big dream of Republican campaign professionals is to force the Democrats into the same circular firing squad that its own party keeps collapsing into. That hasn’t happened yet, but there are signs that a stampede may be building.

The Democrats swallowed their losses in 2010 instead of turning on ObamaCare because they still had the Senate and the White House. If they lose the Senate, suddenly having a lame duck in the White House and a program that everyone hates at the top of the news hour won’t seem like such a bargain.

Obama knows all this and doesn’t care. He’s counting on the left to have his back while sacrificing the political fortunes of the Democratic Party for the sake of the progressive agenda. The Democrats might have held on to Congress, but Obama traded their political successes for his own success; weakening the Democratic Party while building his own image and power.

Now the Democratic Party is beginning to bite back. If it’s going to get into shape for 2014 and 2016, it has to claw back donors from OFA and turn the ObamaCare problems into a HillaryCare opportunity. And that is going to mean an ugly political civil war with the left turning on the Democratic Party and the media caught in the middle.

Obama carved up the Democratic Party for political spare parts. Now the Democratic Party is about to return the favor.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • Judahlevi

    As with Obama, I think many political analysts fail to recognize the power of political correctness. If Obama did not have the skin color he did, he never would have been elected. Even his current poll numbers, although low, are much higher than they would be if not for his minority status. Hillary found out that skin color trumped gender on the politically correct scale in 2008.

    Now that skin color is satiated, it is time (according to people who vote to be politically correct) for a woman. The sexists at Emily’s List, a list of high net worth and influential Democratic women, have already said they will only support a women on the Democratic ticket.

    This is not to be underestimated. Some voters will want to make “history” again and prove themselves to be sexists just as Obama supporters proved to be racist. For myself, I don’t care if the president is green with pink polka dots as long as the person is competent. Gender and skin color should have nothing to do with it.

    • Jason

      Beware of Emily’s list. Emily’s list gave Australia the worst prime minister in our history, Julia Gillard. Imagine someone 5 times as divisive as Obama, and 10 times more incompetent. She divided Australia on gender lines, she had 20% support amongst men, 40% amongst women. Given what I know about Hillary Clinton, and her experiences with men, I would expect the same from her. Imagine an address to Congress claiming she was the victim of misogyny from the GOP. Gillard did that in our parliament, and was lauded as a hero by the leftwing press, and lampooned by the right wing press. Emily’s list at your peril.

    • Robert Lande

      Competent would be nice for once.

  • truebearing

    The broadsides between Hillary and Obama could get very interesting. At some point Hillary has to distance herself from Benghazi, so she’ll gladly offer up tidbits about Obama. Being at least as vindictive as Hillary, and entirely incapable of keeping his mouth shut, he will retaliate and try to blame it all on her. I wish them both unflagging energy and no impulse control in their impending battle.

  • Hass

    “In time he will emerge again, the way that Carter and Clinton have, as an elder statesman”

    That Muslime boofhead will never be a statesman.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      and Clinton and Carter are?

      • Hass

        Boofheads mate!

  • http://islesofmyst.co.uk/ Raibeart MacIlleathain

    I love it whenever a Communist Party, regardless of nation, disintegrates. Time for popcorn and soda, an ottoman, and a remote control.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      the soda has already been banned

  • Robert Lande

    What has Hilliary done besides sleep with a president and rack up miles as SOS? She and Obama own Benghazi.

    • jmulcahy

      I doubt she ever slept with a President, maybe a first term Governor of a small Southern state, but not since.

  • ADM64

    I’m not sure the Democratic party can split from its hard left base quite that easily. There are a lot of people – including many young people – who really believe all the stuff Obama is selling and who are not going to be keen to see a Clintonian move back to the center. Moreover, Hillary has plenty of baggage and she always struck me as far more ideological than Bill. And she lacks her husband’s political and personal skills. If elected, she will be a brittle, angry difficult person, much like President Obama.

  • Randy Townsend

    Obama’s ego is only rivaled by his incompetence: Anyone who believes Obama will be content to hang out on the golf course after his second term is over is delusional. He CRAVES the attention that being President has given him. As an individual, he is unremarkable, but he knows this. Whether the voters are gullible and naive enough to swallow the lie that Hillary “deserves” to be President remains to be seen, although with the reelection of the Anointed One, it is clear stupidity runs rampant in our society.

  • PStarr

    “Democrat” party. They are in NO way, shape OR form “democratic,” unless you call them Democratic Socialists, which they are.

  • foo

    This sounds a lot like wishful thinking to me.