<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Global Warming God Strikes Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-global-warming-god-strikes-again</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Cold_Drake_80</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5316957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cold_Drake_80]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2013 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5316957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m still waiting coward. Weren&#039;t you the one who bragged about being a terrorist in Central America in the &#039;80s?
That would indicate you&#039;ve continued your terrorist ways to present. If you aren&#039;t a lying coward then that would make you 50 now. That means you aren&#039;t fit for battle so you&#039;ve probably transitioned over to torture or maybe organizing the death squads. Then again you&#039;ve yet to exhibit the intelligence or even low cunning needed to do the later. With that in mind you probably specialize in pulling the finger nails off of women and children to get the men to talk. That sounds about the speed of a good FPMer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still waiting coward. Weren&#8217;t you the one who bragged about being a terrorist in Central America in the &#8217;80s?<br />
That would indicate you&#8217;ve continued your terrorist ways to present. If you aren&#8217;t a lying coward then that would make you 50 now. That means you aren&#8217;t fit for battle so you&#8217;ve probably transitioned over to torture or maybe organizing the death squads. Then again you&#8217;ve yet to exhibit the intelligence or even low cunning needed to do the later. With that in mind you probably specialize in pulling the finger nails off of women and children to get the men to talk. That sounds about the speed of a good FPMer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5316308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2013 23:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5316308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Look at all the charts. It&#039;s blatantly obvious.&quot;



You need to be more specific.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Look at all the charts. It&#8217;s blatantly obvious.&#8221;</p>
<p>You need to be more specific.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5316210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2013 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5316210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;You&#039;re lying. The Chinese are the rudest and most crass people on the planet after the islamopithecines.&quot;
 
Someone has a different impression than yours and they&#039;re &quot;lying?&quot;  Get help.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You&#8217;re lying. The Chinese are the rudest and most crass people on the planet after the islamopithecines.&#8221;</p>
<p>Someone has a different impression than yours and they&#8217;re &#8220;lying?&#8221;  Get help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BagLady</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5316157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BagLady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2013 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5316157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, it&#039;s to do with a cartel of suppliers rigging the prices and the government standing back and saying &quot;What can we do?&quot; Look at all the charts.  It&#039;s blatantly obvious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it&#8217;s to do with a cartel of suppliers rigging the prices and the government standing back and saying &#8220;What can we do?&#8221; Look at all the charts.  It&#8217;s blatantly obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5316107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2013 07:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5316107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course it&#039;s greed. It can&#039;t be failed energy policy of socialist governments. They&#039;re in it for &quot;the people.&quot;


Just kill those stupid rich people already.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it&#8217;s greed. It can&#8217;t be failed energy policy of socialist governments. They&#8217;re in it for &#8220;the people.&#8221;</p>
<p>Just kill those stupid rich people already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5316082</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2013 05:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5316082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Snow&#039;s on the way and, yet again, they are hiking their prices. Let&#039;s see how many old people they kill off this winter.&quot;



I hate to break it to you but this is all the result of socialism and &quot;social justice.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Snow&#8217;s on the way and, yet again, they are hiking their prices. Let&#8217;s see how many old people they kill off this winter.&#8221;</p>
<p>I hate to break it to you but this is all the result of socialism and &#8220;social justice.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5316080</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2013 05:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5316080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Not greed you say. Not need, that&#039;s for sure.&quot;



I&#039;ll make you a deal: You put me in charge of the world&#039;s decisions about distinguishing between need and greed and then I won&#039;t worry about what other people think of my own needs. Since I can&#039;t possibly be greedy, I&#039;m sure that will solve a lot of problems.


Sound like a plan? Or should we all vote on people accused of &quot;excessive greediness&quot; by assembling &quot;people&#039;s courts&quot; around the world?


Great idea. Kill all of the productive people that &quot;seem&quot; greedy to one person or another. About 99.9999999% of the people on the planet are considered greedy by at least someone.


But wait, I know...what we need is global communism. Those guys can decide what we need and how to produce all that stuff when we need it. They can make fantastic 5-year plans and being so incredibly intelligent it should turn out that we all gain from the extra efficiency.


It&#039;s win-in. What could go wrong?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Not greed you say. Not need, that&#8217;s for sure.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll make you a deal: You put me in charge of the world&#8217;s decisions about distinguishing between need and greed and then I won&#8217;t worry about what other people think of my own needs. Since I can&#8217;t possibly be greedy, I&#8217;m sure that will solve a lot of problems.</p>
<p>Sound like a plan? Or should we all vote on people accused of &#8220;excessive greediness&#8221; by assembling &#8220;people&#8217;s courts&#8221; around the world?</p>
<p>Great idea. Kill all of the productive people that &#8220;seem&#8221; greedy to one person or another. About 99.9999999% of the people on the planet are considered greedy by at least someone.</p>
<p>But wait, I know&#8230;what we need is global communism. Those guys can decide what we need and how to produce all that stuff when we need it. They can make fantastic 5-year plans and being so incredibly intelligent it should turn out that we all gain from the extra efficiency.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s win-in. What could go wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BagLady</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5316074</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BagLady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2013 05:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5316074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just looking at the energy suppliers in the UK.  Snow&#039;s on the way and, yet again,  they are hiking their prices.  Let&#039;s see how many old people they kill off this winter.  Not greed you say.  Not need, that&#039;s for sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just looking at the energy suppliers in the UK.  Snow&#8217;s on the way and, yet again,  they are hiking their prices.  Let&#8217;s see how many old people they kill off this winter.  Not greed you say.  Not need, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5315104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2013 01:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5315104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[404 - how very, very interesting...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>404 &#8211; how very, very interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5315085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 23:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5315085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently there is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently there is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cold_Drake_80</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5314966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cold_Drake_80]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5314966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m waiting. So get on with it! Prove what you&#039;ve post or admit you&#039;re a liar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m waiting. So get on with it! Prove what you&#8217;ve post or admit you&#8217;re a liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BagLady</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5314884</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BagLady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5314884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there not flexibility in definition?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there not flexibility in definition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5314701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 06:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5314701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Several countries we would consider 3rd world were declared 1st world under the original understanding of the term.&quot;

Today third world is just another phrase indicating the developing nations, but it&#039;s slightly archaic. Still, people generally understand what it means. Most &quot;developing nations&quot; of today were indeed third world nations according to what economists usually referred to.

It&#039;s just that the first and second worlds have kind of become fuzzy. I guess the ultimate answer is that you have to look at the context in which it&#039;s used and judge if it&#039;s clear or not.

&quot;I was underscoring it&#039;s political hack roots and lack of any utility.&quot;



There is potential to confuse people, no doubt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Several countries we would consider 3rd world were declared 1st world under the original understanding of the term.&#8221;</p>
<p>Today third world is just another phrase indicating the developing nations, but it&#8217;s slightly archaic. Still, people generally understand what it means. Most &#8220;developing nations&#8221; of today were indeed third world nations according to what economists usually referred to.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just that the first and second worlds have kind of become fuzzy. I guess the ultimate answer is that you have to look at the context in which it&#8217;s used and judge if it&#8217;s clear or not.</p>
<p>&#8220;I was underscoring it&#8217;s political hack roots and lack of any utility.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is potential to confuse people, no doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cold_Drake_80</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5314685</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cold_Drake_80]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 05:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5314685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several countries we would consider 3rd world were declared 1st world under the original understanding of the term. The Philippines being an example. Their infrastructure and standard of living would put lie to their 1st World designation. 
As for developed and developing those terms have some actual utility but are outside the scope of the subject at hand.
Go back and read my comment I WAS NOT endorsing the definition. I was underscoring it&#039;s political hack roots and lack of any utility. Drakken, amongst other bigots on FPM, was only to happy to start race baiting but that his psychosis at work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several countries we would consider 3rd world were declared 1st world under the original understanding of the term. The Philippines being an example. Their infrastructure and standard of living would put lie to their 1st World designation.<br />
As for developed and developing those terms have some actual utility but are outside the scope of the subject at hand.<br />
Go back and read my comment I WAS NOT endorsing the definition. I was underscoring it&#8217;s political hack roots and lack of any utility. Drakken, amongst other bigots on FPM, was only to happy to start race baiting but that his psychosis at work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justquitnow</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5332415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[justquitnow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 01:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5332415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this is called the &quot;ah shucks pa&quot; fallacy. The earth doesn&#039;t give a rat&#039;s arse whether it can sustain 7 billion humans. The earth will still be here long after we are all gone. We care because we live in a small band of habitable environment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is called the &#8220;ah shucks pa&#8221; fallacy. The earth doesn&#8217;t give a rat&#8217;s arse whether it can sustain 7 billion humans. The earth will still be here long after we are all gone. We care because we live in a small band of habitable environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justquitnow</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5314605</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[justquitnow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5314605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WTF...dude the bible is fine and all, but if you are going to soak in it for the whole of your adult life without further education on the matter then just keep it to yourself because that path leads to stupid crazy town.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF&#8230;dude the bible is fine and all, but if you are going to soak in it for the whole of your adult life without further education on the matter then just keep it to yourself because that path leads to stupid crazy town.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5314591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5314591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CIA&#039;s been reporting high levels of Chinese urbanization since long before 2009.    Interesting thought process, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CIA&#8217;s been reporting high levels of Chinese urbanization since long before 2009.    Interesting thought process, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5314522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5314522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But it wasn&#039;t about political allies. It was about economic development, albeit through a politicized economic lens. The idea was that yes they would become industrialized according to our models but simply having an alliance with us did not make them first world. They were third world aligned with us.

I suppose if people were using that paradigm we could count that as a third paradigm that was a distortion of the second.

Let&#039;s say you have a &quot;third world&quot; backwater that remains aloof and then decides to create trade agreements with the West. Little comes of it because they don&#039;t fundamentally change anything. Does that change their political alignment? Of course. Does it change their economic situation? The hope is that it will. 

By your third paradigm the only &quot;third world&quot; nations were the nonaligned states. 

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/nonaligned

nonaligned [ˌnɒnəˈlaɪnd]

adj

(Government, Politics &amp; Diplomacy) (of states) not part of a major alliance or power bloc, esp not allied to the US, China, or formerly the Soviet Union

nonalignment  n

Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged © Harper Collins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003



So you&#039;ve conflated third world with nonaligned. I&#039;m sure you&#039;re not the first. But why have 2 terms for the exact same thing? Because one is nominally speaking about economic development models rather than political alignments even though there is a lot of overlap, it&#039;s not the same thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it wasn&#8217;t about political allies. It was about economic development, albeit through a politicized economic lens. The idea was that yes they would become industrialized according to our models but simply having an alliance with us did not make them first world. They were third world aligned with us.</p>
<p>I suppose if people were using that paradigm we could count that as a third paradigm that was a distortion of the second.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say you have a &#8220;third world&#8221; backwater that remains aloof and then decides to create trade agreements with the West. Little comes of it because they don&#8217;t fundamentally change anything. Does that change their political alignment? Of course. Does it change their economic situation? The hope is that it will. </p>
<p>By your third paradigm the only &#8220;third world&#8221; nations were the nonaligned states. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/nonaligned" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefreedictionary.com/nonaligned</a></p>
<p>nonaligned [ˌnɒnəˈlaɪnd]</p>
<p>adj</p>
<p>(Government, Politics &amp; Diplomacy) (of states) not part of a major alliance or power bloc, esp not allied to the US, China, or formerly the Soviet Union</p>
<p>nonalignment  n</p>
<p>Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged © Harper Collins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003</p>
<p>So you&#8217;ve conflated third world with nonaligned. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re not the first. But why have 2 terms for the exact same thing? Because one is nominally speaking about economic development models rather than political alignments even though there is a lot of overlap, it&#8217;s not the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cold_Drake_80</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5314341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cold_Drake_80]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5314341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trying looking up the original definition. 1st World designated US allies, 2nd Soviet/Chinese aligned ones and 3rd were technically unaligned. Yeesh, it only took me a couple of minutes to actually find that. Quit whining and don&#039;t be such a sloth. For that matter if you had actually read the thread instead of whining you could have figured it out.
My post was about how stupid the definition actually was but I suppose you didn&#039;t notice that either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying looking up the original definition. 1st World designated US allies, 2nd Soviet/Chinese aligned ones and 3rd were technically unaligned. Yeesh, it only took me a couple of minutes to actually find that. Quit whining and don&#8217;t be such a sloth. For that matter if you had actually read the thread instead of whining you could have figured it out.<br />
My post was about how stupid the definition actually was but I suppose you didn&#8217;t notice that either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cold_Drake_80</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-global-warming-god-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-5314327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cold_Drake_80]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210605#comment-5314327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All right punk it&#039;s put up or shut up time. What country are you working in? What job do you do? How long have you been doing it?
Spit it out or prove to us all you&#039;re a liar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All right punk it&#8217;s put up or shut up time. What country are you working in? What job do you do? How long have you been doing it?<br />
Spit it out or prove to us all you&#8217;re a liar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 834/936 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 12:11:53 by W3 Total Cache -->