<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Violence We Don’t See</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-violence-we-dont-see</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 04:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 11:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TB:  &quot;Sounds like a Progressive. Thinking, including interpretation, analysis, deduction, induction, synthesis, etc. is not done with ideology. Those who substitute ideology for rational thinking are ultimately all the same. Consequence is the only thing one needs to understand in making decisions. Ideology can&#039;t calculate consequences, it can only rigidly predict them, assuming rigid adherence to dogma.  You adhere far too rigidly to dogma.  I question your logic, and tactics. You limit the possibilities so that your dogma can win.  If you are going to waste your energy on relatively trivial things like a negative book review, what good are you in the fight against statism?&quot;


Wake up.  Take off your blinders.  You&#039;ve been seduced by THE BIGGEST LIE OF ALL:  PROGRESS AS A NATION IS NOT CONSERVATIVE.  The essential argument of Communism and Islamism is that Capitalism is &quot;bad&quot;, because nations must grow, i.e. consume more resources, dominate more markets, etc. etc. etc. at the expense of other nations.  In the Communist and Islamist way of thinking, national identity must give way to the collective good of humanity.  Unfortunately, it&#039;s all completely false.  As Adam Smith understood very well, it is the WEALTH OF NATIONS that counts and that nations must necessarily grow poor or wealthy as a TEAM.  Building up TEAM AMERICA to compete and win in the highly competitive global marketplace of the 21st Century is the ONLY truly conservative value that matters.  The idea that &quot;progress&quot; bad or that &quot;statism&quot; is bad are both corollaries of the Big Lie of Communism and Islamism referred to above.  The truth is that Amiercans will win together or lose together as a team, and that is the only Authentic American Conservative value that matters.

TB:  &quot;How do you ascertain that someone&#039;s tactics, as you describe them, are &quot;hate-filled?&quot; Yet another non sequitur conclusion, and hauntingly reminiscent of Leftist propaganda.&quot;



You should be able to figure that out for yourself.  Once again, the object of all Bolshevik and Communist ideology was to convince Americans that they should feel guilty that they even exist at all.  The truth is that America is the LAST BEST HOPE FOR HUMANITY.

TB: &quot;You are a rigid ideologue -- well meaning, I&#039;m sure -- but a rigid ideologue, nonetheless. Your analysis of the difference between Reagan and Goldwater is a classic example. Reagan was elected as the president of the United States, twice. Goldwater lost. That means Goldwater was never forced to compromise on ideological principles in order to accomodate the exigencies of presidential decisions. You live in an ideological fog, where all problems can be solved by a one-size-fits-all, handy-dandy ideology. That is frankly delusional.&#039;


As alluded to above, Conservatism is not about ideology at all.  Conservatism is pragmatic and asks only one question:  What works?  And the only question conservatives need to be asking themselves at this point in time is what is it going to take to turn the American nation around so that we can compete successfully against other nations in the highly competitive global economic wars of the 21st Century.


TB: &quot;Life doesn&#039;t work that way, especially at the presidential level. The art of compromise is essential in a country that protects broad freedoms. There are many ideological viewpoints in America, and they don&#039;t all agree with you. The only way to rule as a president, while satisfying your ideological obession, is to rule as a dictator. That, of course, would contradict your ideology, wouldn&#039;t it?&quot;


Compromise is always the path to mediocrity, and is always the death of competitiveness and winning.  Any politician who is willing to compromise America&#039;s ability to compete and win in the global economic battles of the 21st Century is no conservative.

TB: &quot;One&#039;s political enlightenment is not determined by one person&#039;s opinion of a book review, especially when that person hasn&#039;t read the book that was reviewed. I believe that is called checkmate.&quot;



The test of enlightenment for any Conservative is whether he or she is able to recognize, reject, and ultimately leave behind all of the Big Lies of Communism and Islamism referred to above.  In the Authentically American Conservative scheme of things, nothing is more important that INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM, and the ultimate value for the individual is HELPING THE TEAM WIN.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB:  &#8220;Sounds like a Progressive. Thinking, including interpretation, analysis, deduction, induction, synthesis, etc. is not done with ideology. Those who substitute ideology for rational thinking are ultimately all the same. Consequence is the only thing one needs to understand in making decisions. Ideology can&#8217;t calculate consequences, it can only rigidly predict them, assuming rigid adherence to dogma.  You adhere far too rigidly to dogma.  I question your logic, and tactics. You limit the possibilities so that your dogma can win.  If you are going to waste your energy on relatively trivial things like a negative book review, what good are you in the fight against statism?&#8221;</p>
<p>Wake up.  Take off your blinders.  You&#8217;ve been seduced by THE BIGGEST LIE OF ALL:  PROGRESS AS A NATION IS NOT CONSERVATIVE.  The essential argument of Communism and Islamism is that Capitalism is &#8220;bad&#8221;, because nations must grow, i.e. consume more resources, dominate more markets, etc. etc. etc. at the expense of other nations.  In the Communist and Islamist way of thinking, national identity must give way to the collective good of humanity.  Unfortunately, it&#8217;s all completely false.  As Adam Smith understood very well, it is the WEALTH OF NATIONS that counts and that nations must necessarily grow poor or wealthy as a TEAM.  Building up TEAM AMERICA to compete and win in the highly competitive global marketplace of the 21st Century is the ONLY truly conservative value that matters.  The idea that &#8220;progress&#8221; bad or that &#8220;statism&#8221; is bad are both corollaries of the Big Lie of Communism and Islamism referred to above.  The truth is that Amiercans will win together or lose together as a team, and that is the only Authentic American Conservative value that matters.</p>
<p>TB:  &#8220;How do you ascertain that someone&#8217;s tactics, as you describe them, are &#8220;hate-filled?&#8221; Yet another non sequitur conclusion, and hauntingly reminiscent of Leftist propaganda.&#8221;</p>
<p>You should be able to figure that out for yourself.  Once again, the object of all Bolshevik and Communist ideology was to convince Americans that they should feel guilty that they even exist at all.  The truth is that America is the LAST BEST HOPE FOR HUMANITY.</p>
<p>TB: &#8220;You are a rigid ideologue &#8212; well meaning, I&#8217;m sure &#8212; but a rigid ideologue, nonetheless. Your analysis of the difference between Reagan and Goldwater is a classic example. Reagan was elected as the president of the United States, twice. Goldwater lost. That means Goldwater was never forced to compromise on ideological principles in order to accomodate the exigencies of presidential decisions. You live in an ideological fog, where all problems can be solved by a one-size-fits-all, handy-dandy ideology. That is frankly delusional.&#8217;</p>
<p>As alluded to above, Conservatism is not about ideology at all.  Conservatism is pragmatic and asks only one question:  What works?  And the only question conservatives need to be asking themselves at this point in time is what is it going to take to turn the American nation around so that we can compete successfully against other nations in the highly competitive global economic wars of the 21st Century.</p>
<p>TB: &#8220;Life doesn&#8217;t work that way, especially at the presidential level. The art of compromise is essential in a country that protects broad freedoms. There are many ideological viewpoints in America, and they don&#8217;t all agree with you. The only way to rule as a president, while satisfying your ideological obession, is to rule as a dictator. That, of course, would contradict your ideology, wouldn&#8217;t it?&#8221;</p>
<p>Compromise is always the path to mediocrity, and is always the death of competitiveness and winning.  Any politician who is willing to compromise America&#8217;s ability to compete and win in the global economic battles of the 21st Century is no conservative.</p>
<p>TB: &#8220;One&#8217;s political enlightenment is not determined by one person&#8217;s opinion of a book review, especially when that person hasn&#8217;t read the book that was reviewed. I believe that is called checkmate.&#8221;</p>
<p>The test of enlightenment for any Conservative is whether he or she is able to recognize, reject, and ultimately leave behind all of the Big Lies of Communism and Islamism referred to above.  In the Authentically American Conservative scheme of things, nothing is more important that INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM, and the ultimate value for the individual is HELPING THE TEAM WIN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274694</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My belief that she has not done so is based on what I have read of her &quot;rebuttal.&quot; Your blithering is essentially useless, since you take no meaningful stand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My belief that she has not done so is based on what I have read of her &#8220;rebuttal.&#8221; Your blithering is essentially useless, since you take no meaningful stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 05:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t you have anything more meaningful to accomplish?
BTW, this isn&#039;t the Diana West thread. Maybe Frontpage should provide you a map.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you have anything more meaningful to accomplish?<br />
BTW, this isn&#8217;t the Diana West thread. Maybe Frontpage should provide you a map.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2013 05:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It is entirely possible that he is too angry to move beyond the failures and frustrations of the past into a positive and enthusiastic vision and action plan for the future.&quot;
Sounds like a Progressive.

Thinking, including interpretation, analysis, deduction, induction, synthesis, etc. is not done with ideology. Those who substitute ideology for rational thinking are ultimately all the same. Consequence is the only thing one needs to understand in making decisions. Ideology can&#039;t calculate consequences, it can only rigidly predict them, assuming rigid adherence to dogma.

You adhere far too rigidly to dogma.

I question your logic, and tactics. You limit the possibilities so that your dogma can win.

If you are going to waste your energy on relatively trivial things like a negative book review, what good are you in the fight against statism? 

How do you ascertain that someone&#039;s tactics, as you describe them, are &quot;hate-filled?&quot; Yet another non sequitur conclusion, and hauntingly reminiscent of Leftist propaganda.

You are a rigid ideologue -- well meaning, I&#039;m sure -- but a rigid ideologue, nonetheless. Your analysis of the difference between Reagan and Goldwater is a classic example. Reagan was elected as the president of the United States, twice. Goldwater lost. That means Goldwater was never forced to compromise on ideological principles in order to accomodate the exigencies of presidential decisions. You live in an ideological fog, where all problems can be solved by a one-size-fits-all, handy-dandy ideology. That is frankly delusional. Life doesn&#039;t work that way, especially at the presidential level. The art of compromise is essential in a country that protects broad freedoms. There are many ideological viewpoints in America, and they don&#039;t all agree with you. The only way to rule as a president, while satisfying your ideological obession, is to rule as a dictator. That, of course, would contradict your ideology, wouldn&#039;t it?

One&#039;s political enlightenment is not determined by one person&#039;s opinion of a book review, especially when that person hasn&#039;t read the book that was reviewed. I believe that is called checkmate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is entirely possible that he is too angry to move beyond the failures and frustrations of the past into a positive and enthusiastic vision and action plan for the future.&#8221;<br />
Sounds like a Progressive.</p>
<p>Thinking, including interpretation, analysis, deduction, induction, synthesis, etc. is not done with ideology. Those who substitute ideology for rational thinking are ultimately all the same. Consequence is the only thing one needs to understand in making decisions. Ideology can&#8217;t calculate consequences, it can only rigidly predict them, assuming rigid adherence to dogma.</p>
<p>You adhere far too rigidly to dogma.</p>
<p>I question your logic, and tactics. You limit the possibilities so that your dogma can win.</p>
<p>If you are going to waste your energy on relatively trivial things like a negative book review, what good are you in the fight against statism? </p>
<p>How do you ascertain that someone&#8217;s tactics, as you describe them, are &#8220;hate-filled?&#8221; Yet another non sequitur conclusion, and hauntingly reminiscent of Leftist propaganda.</p>
<p>You are a rigid ideologue &#8212; well meaning, I&#8217;m sure &#8212; but a rigid ideologue, nonetheless. Your analysis of the difference between Reagan and Goldwater is a classic example. Reagan was elected as the president of the United States, twice. Goldwater lost. That means Goldwater was never forced to compromise on ideological principles in order to accomodate the exigencies of presidential decisions. You live in an ideological fog, where all problems can be solved by a one-size-fits-all, handy-dandy ideology. That is frankly delusional. Life doesn&#8217;t work that way, especially at the presidential level. The art of compromise is essential in a country that protects broad freedoms. There are many ideological viewpoints in America, and they don&#8217;t all agree with you. The only way to rule as a president, while satisfying your ideological obession, is to rule as a dictator. That, of course, would contradict your ideology, wouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>One&#8217;s political enlightenment is not determined by one person&#8217;s opinion of a book review, especially when that person hasn&#8217;t read the book that was reviewed. I believe that is called checkmate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You purposely ignored my comments on your hypocrisy, not surprisingly. Instead, you went righ back to your repetitive blather about the wrongs you perceive over West&#039;s negative review. You&#039;re the one who should be embarrassed...if only you were smart enough to understand why.
How is a book review trying to shut anyone up? That is utterly moronic. Are you so deluded that you think all reviews have to be positive? Are you operating under some theory of intellectual entitlement, where anyone who writes a book must have unamimous praise? What planet have you been wandering around on, lo these many confused years?
If you have a problem with ZiggyZoggy, tell him. Don&#039;t try to enlist me in your peer censorship scheme. Grow a pair and take him on...if you think you can.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You purposely ignored my comments on your hypocrisy, not surprisingly. Instead, you went righ back to your repetitive blather about the wrongs you perceive over West&#8217;s negative review. You&#8217;re the one who should be embarrassed&#8230;if only you were smart enough to understand why.<br />
How is a book review trying to shut anyone up? That is utterly moronic. Are you so deluded that you think all reviews have to be positive? Are you operating under some theory of intellectual entitlement, where anyone who writes a book must have unamimous praise? What planet have you been wandering around on, lo these many confused years?<br />
If you have a problem with ZiggyZoggy, tell him. Don&#8217;t try to enlist me in your peer censorship scheme. Grow a pair and take him on&#8230;if you think you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCraigen</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RCraigen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Currently the only reason I&#039;m revisiting this thread is to see if Mr. Horowitz is going to chime in again with his earlier revealing statement, &quot;Thank you Ziggy Zoggy&quot;.  Keep it up Zig, your words speak volumes about you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently the only reason I&#8217;m revisiting this thread is to see if Mr. Horowitz is going to chime in again with his earlier revealing statement, &#8220;Thank you Ziggy Zoggy&#8221;.  Keep it up Zig, your words speak volumes about you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziggy zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who said anything about judging people on their race? And who said the majority of Blacks have committed crimes? I asked you how you know the majority of Blacks aren&#039;t criminals because I don&#039;t think you have any idea what proportion of Blacks are prone to criminality.


Having a supremacist attitude toward all other religions and people is as extreme as it gets, short of murder - which is the next step. Every islamopithecine is a ticking tome bomb and potential terrorist. Any islamopithecine who aids, cheerleads, excuses or ignores terrorism for jihad is guilty of extremism. Not only that, but any islamopithecine who doesn&#039;t actively oppose it is guilty. And that&#039;s just it. Islam doesn&#039;t allow dissent. Any islamopithecine who does so is a heretic and is supposed to be executed under Islamic &quot;law.&quot; There are no innocent islamopithecines. Islam is worse than crack or meth. It can turn anybody into an animal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said anything about judging people on their race? And who said the majority of Blacks have committed crimes? I asked you how you know the majority of Blacks aren&#8217;t criminals because I don&#8217;t think you have any idea what proportion of Blacks are prone to criminality.</p>
<p>Having a supremacist attitude toward all other religions and people is as extreme as it gets, short of murder &#8211; which is the next step. Every islamopithecine is a ticking tome bomb and potential terrorist. Any islamopithecine who aids, cheerleads, excuses or ignores terrorism for jihad is guilty of extremism. Not only that, but any islamopithecine who doesn&#8217;t actively oppose it is guilty. And that&#8217;s just it. Islam doesn&#8217;t allow dissent. Any islamopithecine who does so is a heretic and is supposed to be executed under Islamic &#8220;law.&#8221; There are no innocent islamopithecines. Islam is worse than crack or meth. It can turn anybody into an animal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Way to go, Ziggy.  It&#039;s clear that you&#039;ve been studying your Communist &quot;Attack Dog&quot; Handbook.  Please tell us, in what chapter do they talk about how to mug someone and then pretend you&#039;re the victim?  It works for everyone else, why shouldn&#039;t it work for Radosh and Horowitz? Unfortunately, no one is fooled.  Everyone knows that Radosh and Horowitz started the attacks, and now they&#039;re complaining that Diana West is defending herself and making them look bad.  Awwwww.  Isn&#039;t that sad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go, Ziggy.  It&#8217;s clear that you&#8217;ve been studying your Communist &#8220;Attack Dog&#8221; Handbook.  Please tell us, in what chapter do they talk about how to mug someone and then pretend you&#8217;re the victim?  It works for everyone else, why shouldn&#8217;t it work for Radosh and Horowitz? Unfortunately, no one is fooled.  Everyone knows that Radosh and Horowitz started the attacks, and now they&#8217;re complaining that Diana West is defending herself and making them look bad.  Awwwww.  Isn&#8217;t that sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziggy zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, you are a &quot;Westroll.&quot; it&#039;s obvious who you think the Bolshevik and Stalinist is. you have it backwards. you Westrolls are the ones trying to force others to accept your opinions and so is West. Horowitz was honest about your little jihad and gave West the chance to rebut it but she snubbed him started an ad hominem campaign instead. Read this article again. It has nothing to do with the monomania of you Westrolls and your idol. Stop trying to twist into something it isn&#039;t. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you are a &#8220;Westroll.&#8221; it&#8217;s obvious who you think the Bolshevik and Stalinist is. you have it backwards. you Westrolls are the ones trying to force others to accept your opinions and so is West. Horowitz was honest about your little jihad and gave West the chance to rebut it but she snubbed him started an ad hominem campaign instead. Read this article again. It has nothing to do with the monomania of you Westrolls and your idol. Stop trying to twist into something it isn&#8217;t. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziggy zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Except that John Derbyshire is an excellent writer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that John Derbyshire is an excellent writer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziggy zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RCraven, everybody is sick of listening to you Westrolls whine. You drove away what few commentators there were on the thread that was supposed to end the one sided feud from your idol, and now you&#039;re wasting people&#039;s time here. I read West&#039;s 3 part excuse and I think I lost brain cells for having done it. It would be safer to huff paint and watch MSNBC than read more of her strident accusations and cheap sophistry. She had a chance to rebut her book review here but chose to attack the FPM writers personally instead - from the safety of another website. She is a hypocrite and a fraud. So are all you sycophantic Westrolls. Stick to the subject of this thread and stop pissing everybody off with your distractions.


Nice to see I got under your thin skin, though. I hope you remember me every time you try to disrupt a thread with pettifoggery and insults. Guys like you can dish it out but you can&#039;t take it. Punk.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RCraven, everybody is sick of listening to you Westrolls whine. You drove away what few commentators there were on the thread that was supposed to end the one sided feud from your idol, and now you&#8217;re wasting people&#8217;s time here. I read West&#8217;s 3 part excuse and I think I lost brain cells for having done it. It would be safer to huff paint and watch MSNBC than read more of her strident accusations and cheap sophistry. She had a chance to rebut her book review here but chose to attack the FPM writers personally instead &#8211; from the safety of another website. She is a hypocrite and a fraud. So are all you sycophantic Westrolls. Stick to the subject of this thread and stop pissing everybody off with your distractions.</p>
<p>Nice to see I got under your thin skin, though. I hope you remember me every time you try to disrupt a thread with pettifoggery and insults. Guys like you can dish it out but you can&#8217;t take it. Punk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274320</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziggy zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[truebearing, you&#039;ve done a good job trying to get through to these Westrolls but you&#039;re wasting your time. Even after all you wrote, they are dead set on making us all bow to the altar of West and her vanity - including the owner of this site. She is a lousy writer and a bitch to boot, but these fanatics are fixated on her for some reason. If you mean it when you say the end, they&#039;ll eventually STFU. I&#039;m sure you&#039;re as sick and tired as I am of their obnoxious demands and petty evasions. 


]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>truebearing, you&#8217;ve done a good job trying to get through to these Westrolls but you&#8217;re wasting your time. Even after all you wrote, they are dead set on making us all bow to the altar of West and her vanity &#8211; including the owner of this site. She is a lousy writer and a bitch to boot, but these fanatics are fixated on her for some reason. If you mean it when you say the end, they&#8217;ll eventually STFU. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re as sick and tired as I am of their obnoxious demands and petty evasions. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziggy zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Give a few of West&#039;s books away for Christmas? I guess you can&#039;t afford to give toilet paper. Better hurry. That book is bargain bin and return to publisher only.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give a few of West&#8217;s books away for Christmas? I guess you can&#8217;t afford to give toilet paper. Better hurry. That book is bargain bin and return to publisher only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smoking Hamster</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smoking Hamster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t like reading people based on their skin color. I am not going to judge all blacks based on the violent actions of a minority. I am not a collectivist and racism is one of the worst form forms of collectivism. &quot;And how do you know most Blacks aren&#039;t criminal?&quot; Innocent until proven guilty. You must show me that the majority of blacks have committed crimes.

Look Islam is a violent and extremist religion. I criticize Islam all the time. If you are a Muslim and you believe in those teachings I will criticize your beliefs. I will not assume that all Muslims are extremists though. Wanting your religion to be supreme is NOT the same thing as fighting and killing people to make it supreme.

&quot;Don&#039;t judge the Muslims that you know by Islam and don&#039;t judge Islam by the Muslims that you know. &quot;

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/Statement-on-Muslims.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like reading people based on their skin color. I am not going to judge all blacks based on the violent actions of a minority. I am not a collectivist and racism is one of the worst form forms of collectivism. &#8220;And how do you know most Blacks aren&#8217;t criminal?&#8221; Innocent until proven guilty. You must show me that the majority of blacks have committed crimes.</p>
<p>Look Islam is a violent and extremist religion. I criticize Islam all the time. If you are a Muslim and you believe in those teachings I will criticize your beliefs. I will not assume that all Muslims are extremists though. Wanting your religion to be supreme is NOT the same thing as fighting and killing people to make it supreme.</p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t judge the Muslims that you know by Islam and don&#8217;t judge Islam by the Muslims that you know. &#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/Statement-on-Muslims.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Pages/Statement-on-Muslims.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274292</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziggy zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quit trying to hijack these threads with your Westroll bull$hit. Nobody cares about your idol&#039;s crappy book.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quit trying to hijack these threads with your Westroll bull$hit. Nobody cares about your idol&#8217;s crappy book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziggy zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And your obnoxious Westrolling is exactly how the left distracts commentators from the subject of a thread. Get over your unhealthy fixation and stop wasting everybody else&#039;s time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And your obnoxious Westrolling is exactly how the left distracts commentators from the subject of a thread. Get over your unhealthy fixation and stop wasting everybody else&#8217;s time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274284</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziggy zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a lousy reason to read a website - and futile. Go back to Worst&#039;s website and wallow in your conspiracy theories. You Westrolls bore the $hit out of everybody else here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a lousy reason to read a website &#8211; and futile. Go back to Worst&#8217;s website and wallow in your conspiracy theories. You Westrolls bore the $hit out of everybody else here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziggy zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you Westrolls have to ruin every thread with your stupid whining and accusations? Give it a rest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you Westrolls have to ruin every thread with your stupid whining and accusations? Give it a rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274277</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziggy zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep. American Blacks tend to be trash compared to non-islamopithecine African Blacks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. American Blacks tend to be trash compared to non-islamopithecine African Blacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/the-violence-we-dont-see/comment-page-1/#comment-5274275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziggy zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203726#comment-5274275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even non violent islamopithecines want Islam to be supreme. They are ALL jihadis. And how do you know most Blacks aren&#039;t criminal? What proportion have criminal records and what proportion haven&#039;t been convicted for their crimes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even non violent islamopithecines want Islam to be supreme. They are ALL jihadis. And how do you know most Blacks aren&#8217;t criminal? What proportion have criminal records and what proportion haven&#8217;t been convicted for their crimes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 769/820 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 23:24:31 by W3 Total Cache -->