UK Imam Blasts Muslim Racism Behind Sex Abuse of British Girls

oxford-guilty_2562697b

Yes Dr. Taj Hargey is technically a Muslim cleric. But he’s a member of an actual tiny minority. That tiny minority of Muslims that actually want a liberal Islam. As a sample of how out of the Muslim mainstream he is, he advocates a Burka ban, mixed marriages, co-ed prayers and is a member of British Muslims for Secular Democracy. (However Hargey is clearly on the left and is stridently anti-Israel, etc… so the Salman Rushdie caution applies.)

Hargey represents the sort of liberal egalitarian thing that the Left pretends Islam really is. Which is why the left studiously ignores him, while working with Muslim Brotherhood front groups, and he’s reduced to writing Daily Mail editorials.

The fact is that the vicious activities of the Oxford ring are bound up with religion and race: religion, because all the perpetrators, though they had different nationalities, were Muslim; and race, because they deliberately targeted vulnerable white girls, whom they appeared to regard as ‘easy meat’, to use one of their revealing, racist phrases.

Indeed, one of the victims who bravely gave evidence in court told a newspaper afterwards that ‘the men exclusively wanted white girls to abuse’.

The view of some Islamic preachers towards white women can be appalling. They encourage their followers to believe that these women are habitually promiscuous, decadent and sleazy — sins which are made all the worse by the fact that they are kaffurs or non-believers.

Their dress code, from mini-skirts to sleeveless tops, is deemed to reflect their impure and immoral outlook. According to this mentality, these white women deserve to be punished for their behaviour by being exploited and degraded.

On one level, most imams in the UK are simply using their puritanical sermons to promote the wearing of the hijab and even the burka among their female adherents. But the dire result can be the brutish misogyny we see in the Oxford sex ring.

Another sign of the cowardly approach to these horrors is the constant reference to the criminals as ‘Asians’ rather than as ‘Muslims’.

In this context, Asian is a completely meaningless term.  The men were not from China, or India or Sri Lanka or even Bangladesh. They were all from either Pakistan or Eritrea, which is, in fact, in East Africa rather than Asia.

Commentators and politicians tip-toe around it, hiding behind weasel words.

We are told that child sex abuse happens ‘in all communities’, that white men are really far more likely to be abusers, as has been shown by the fall-out from the Jimmy Savile case.

One particularly misguided commentary argued that the predators’ religion was an irrelevance, for what really mattered was that most of them worked in the night-time economy as taxi drivers, just as in the Rochdale child sex scandal many of the abusers worked in kebab houses, so they had far more opportunities to target vulnerable girls.

In all these incidents, the abusers were Muslim men, and their targets were under-age white girls.

Moreover, reputable studies show that around 26 per cent of those involved in grooming and exploitation rings are Muslims, which is around five times higher than the proportion of Muslims in the adult male population.

But then part of the reason this scandal happened at all is precisely because of such politically correct thinking. All the agencies of the state, including the police, the social services and the care system, seemed eager to ignore the sickening exploitation that was happening before their eyes.

Terrified of accusations of racism, desperate not to undermine the official creed of cultural diversity, they took no action against obvious abuse.

Amazingly, the predators seem to have been allowed by local authority managers to come and go from care homes, picking their targets to ply them with drink and drugs before abusing them. You can be sure that if the situation had been reversed, with gangs of tough, young white men preying on vulnerable Muslim girls, the state’s agencies would have acted with greater alacrity.

That last sentence is the one thing that hardly anyone has said out loud about these cases. And yet it is indubitably true.

  • Parenthetical Phrase

    Part 1: It is tragic that the elitists in the UK happily inflict such pain and suffering on their most vulnerable citizens in return for ……? I heard a British professor in New York say (during a debate on Islam with Irshad Manji) that the Church of England is the state religion in the UK and Muslims are a minority. The Church of England therefore has pretty broad shoulders (yes, that was the term he used) and could be criticized while Islam (a minority religion) should not be (criticized).

  • Parenthetical Phrase

    Part 2: To this I would say that while the Church may have "broad shoulders" and maybe even some Christian clergy do, the English people (including these girls) assuredly do not. Nor do the thousands of people who have been the victims of Muslim harassment or the taxpayers who must cover the costs incurred by appeasement to Muslim demands and nor do the thousands of non-Christian, non-Muslim minorities who are the targets of Muslims and who the Christians deem "unimportant". I would like to think that the pendulum will soon swing in the opposite direction but in the UK I'm not so sure. The UK is a society in which social and economic mobility is not significant and the citizens appear to accept that all too much. I hope it changes.

  • Michael Copeland

    Both race (white victims) and religion, Islamic jihad sex-slave taking are hugely important.
    See their faces all round the world:
    Liberty GB – Child Sex Gangs
    libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/news-libertygb/5676-child-sex-gangs‎

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

    I can't believe I actually agree with this guy.

  • http://www.adinakutnicki.com AdinaK

    Firstly, yes, there is a tiny fraction of practicing Muslims who ARE liberal in their interpretation of separation of mosque and state, plus other related matters. I can name a handful. That being said, raping "infidels" is a crime which is very appealing to Muslim men. This is rooted in 2 pathological arenas. Firstly, their sexual repression, and guilt over enjoying it, is enormous. But more importantly, the defiling of the infidel woman is underlined in Sharia Law. Moreover, the relationship with their mothers is rife with explosive negativity. It is very complicated, but its essence can be found in "Islam & Blood" – http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/13/islam-blood-a

    Let us salute this cleric and hope he lives to tell more truths!.

    Adina kutnicki, Israel http://adinakutnicki.com/about/

  • objectivefactsmatter

    "Yes Dr. Taj Hargey is technically a Muslim cleric. But he’s a member of an actual tiny minority. "

    Insane mutants.