What’s More Dangerous? An Asteroid or Global Warming?

The latest phase of the Global Warming scam has been to rename it to Climate Change and to blame it for every natural disaster in the world. If you had to leave your house due to Hurricane Sandy, you are now officially a “Climate Change Refugee”. But despite a valiant effort by a CNN anchorwoman, blaming meteors and asteroids on Global Warming is a tough sell even for the Al Gore gang.

After the widely publicized meteorite over Russia and the accompanying calls by Russia and other countries for a skywatch program that would intercept and destroy incoming objects, the Global Warming scammers have redoubled their efforts by screeching that Global Warming AKA Planet Heat Death 2012 AKA Climate Change is still much more dangerous than a huge rock colliding with the planet.

The House Science, Space and Technology Committee is holding hearings on the asteroid threat and that kind of thing freaks out the ecoscammers because the whole point of the Global Warming scam is to protect the funding that keeps the scam going.

The House Science, Space and Technology Committee will hold a hearing on how to “better identify and address asteroids that pose a potential threat to Earth,” Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) said in a statement on Friday.

“Today’s events are a stark reminder of the need to invest in space science,” Smith said. “Asteroid 2012 DA14 passed just 17,000 miles from Earth, less than the distance of a round trip from New York to Sydney. And this morning, a much smaller meteorite hit near the Russian city of Chelyabinsk, damaging buildings and injuring hundreds.”

“Developing technology and research that enable us to track objects like Asteroid 2012 DA14 is critical to our future,” Smith said. “We should continue to invest in systems that identify threatening asteroids and develop contingencies, if needed, to change the course of an asteroid headed toward Earth.”

When the threat priority changes, as it did during the War on Terror, the ecocammers begin rushing out articles claiming that

A. Global Warming is a bigger threat than Islamic Terrorism

B. Terrorism is caused by Global Warming

The Global Warming > Asteroids argument is being made by claiming not that asteroid impacts are caused by Global Warming (though the science has already been perverted so badly that they might as well go there. Your average CNN anchorwoman or liberal politician does not know any better) but that asteroid impacts cause “Climate Change” therefore what’s really dangerous is people exhaling and cows ruminating.

Forget big rocks colliding with the ocean, cow farts are still the number one threat to the planet and can only be met by giving Al Gore a lot of money.

  • Toni_Pereira

    Any idea fits inside Gore's head. He just have to claim that GW attracts asteroids to Earth and all the morons in government and the academy will applaude. Problem solved…

    • http://www.adinakutnicki.com AdinaK

      When economic scammers see that their gravy train is halting they go crazy. Bonkers. Nuts. But one would think – wouldn't one – that the "godfather" of "warming science" is rich enough, having made millions upon millions as he sold out to Arab oil interests. Now, isn't it a hoot, here we have a man who "invented" "warming science", blaming all of its disasters on this and that energy consumption, and then he engorges himself on oil money!!
      So, whatever comes out of his/their mouth should be taken as either fraudulent or hooey – http://adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/16/the-leftistti

      Believe them at your own peril!

      Adina Kutnicki, Israel – http://adinakutnicki.com/about/

  • Peter WA

    Other week on scientific series presented on local Australian TV – ABC (government channel), featured story regarding volcanoes at bottom of oceans and regular eruptions which eventually attract and spawn new bio-diversities through the volcanic chemical introduction… and not too mention… the constant heating of the waters (at depth)… no mention about impact on "Greenhouse Effect" or "Global Warming" or "Climate Change" or whatever 'they' change the label to this week – except that, of course, it's a constant natural event. Then there are the volcanoes above ground which, in some places have a constant magma/lave flow and geysers (such as in NZ and Yellowstone Nat.Park. I wonder how they go about carbon-taxing the volcanoes? Summer here in Western Australia is still hot (as usual). And I see on the news that Moscow still gets freezing cold winters… watched a youtube video regarding a man's visit to a jet company called "Weather Modification Systems" re pilots who fly and silver-iodonise the skies to cause certain effects… difficult to verify, but seemed a legit yarn. Asteroids/Meteors crashing first of many (I believe re Holy Bible). "Wormwood"… comes to mind. God Bless.

    • Peter

      Excuse my typing/spelling/punctuation errors (please).

  • Mary Sue

    So then Islam is caused by Global Warming? [/sarcasm]

    • Daniel Greenfield

      Sure. Just throw in something about migrating populations. A proper ecoscammer could write up a whole paper linking the rise of Islam to climate change in the time of Mohammed.

  • Bobbi

    It's unbelievable to me that Gore pedals his snake oil and people still pay to drink it. The planet goes through its own changes just one volcanoes erupting could warm or cool the planet, USA is only one country. Pollution in other nations are enormous, but we all must pay Gore for the snake oil cause explaination and his pay me to offset your carbon footprint solution.

    • figment

      China uses 3.8billion tons of coal a year/increasing and their environmental policies are non-existtent but you dont' hearof any watermelons going over to China and dictating THEIR policies.

      Hypocrites. manbearpig being the head hypocrite

      • zalukas

        They must heard what happened to unauthorized demonstration at Tienanmen Square.
        Mass lead poisoning.
        Is it even in this country’s History school books?

  • Mary Sue

    What's more dangerous is not being able to tell the difference between an asteroid, and global warming.

  • bob e

    i think al g should find a way to compute meterorite carbon emissions
    & tax them and put the cash in his pocket. whadda' ya' think dan ??

  • Asher

    An Asteroid is more dangerous, particularly a large one, there are more coming as well as eclipses of the sun and moon. Joel 2: 30-31. "And I will show you wonders in the heavens and in the earth. Blood and fire and pillars of smoke. The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before the great and awesome day of the Lord."

  • Donald

    I have a question….Does anyone know what percentage of global warming is caused by man-made emissions and how much is the result of natural causes?

    • BS77

      When Mt. Pinotubo erupted in the Phillipines it is estimated it released the equivalent of twenty cubic miles of dust, gas, smoke and debris….more than all the cars, jets, trains, power plants have released in human history. Mt. St Helen's released about a cubic mile of rock, dust, ash and gas. Just remember, about 19 thousand years ago, ice was two miles thick in a huge ice shield, over Nebraska, Chicago, New York and all of Canada….it melted away and there was not one SUV to blame for it….The main factor in global temperature changes are 1)mean solar radiant….i.e., how much energy the sun is releasing…and this goes up and down over the millenia….and 2) volcanic eruptions and asteroid impacts. Humans have done a lot of damage to the planet but asphalt parking lots contribute more to global warming than coal fired power systems or cars.

      • zalukas

        So island of Guam is going to tip over? I heard it on TV !

    • WilliamJamesWard

      Fair enough question but I think the data is possibly impossible to measure. There are records
      in the earth, in ice as to the composition of the air. There was considerably more carbon in the
      air prior to the explosions of man across the World. Google Carbon in Earth's History, try
      to find a non political and scammer outlet……………….William

  • figment

    what's more dangerous is a statist elites thinking they can tax the wealthy over something that is clearly beyond the control of mere mortals and the uninformed, clueless populace who goes along with the idea because they think it doesn't affect them. Yet. (eat the rich, it feeeeels good )

    Agenda 21

    • figment

      "are the statist elites"

      wish there was an edit button

  • JSH

    You and many others perpetuate the implicaiton that "global warming" was renamed "climate change" to soften the message and make it more acceptable to general debate.

    I worked in NOAA during the George W. Bush administration, and I witnessed exactly the opposite:

    I watched scientists in NOAA be instructed – off the record – via superiors with traceability to Republican politicals high in the Department of Commerce – to replace the term global warming with "climate change" so the existing politicals would have less explaining to do upstream in the power and money structure.

    I saw and heard it happen. The message was to lay low on the word warming.

  • pinnie

    three ring circus….BS..& money grubbing greed…I often wondered how Mrs.Gore could have slept with that. He is a vile example of what WE SPEND R WHOLE LIFE, TRYING NOT TO BE….

  • patrick

    @JSH … yeah sure you did. You saw and heard it happen. Blame it on Bush.


    I wish Al Gorezerra was on an asteroid.

  • http://twitter.com/globalwarmingwe @globalwarmingwe

    I have come to the conclusion that we all have a little blame global warming and its consequences and guilt even more politicians who do not slow down.