<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Needs the Family?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=who-needs-the-family</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: FrontPgSubscr</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4296621</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FrontPgSubscr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4296621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton, 1834-1902 (aka Lord Acton): 
               &#8220;Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.&#8221; 
                                                                     ⋯ 
               &quot;For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and  
                lose his own soul?&quot; -  Matthew 16: 26 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton, 1834-1902 (aka Lord Acton):<br />
               &ldquo;Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.&rdquo;<br />
                                                                     ⋯<br />
               &quot;For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and<br />
                lose his own soul?&quot; &#8211;  Matthew 16: 26 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrontPgSubscr</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4296561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FrontPgSubscr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4296561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CRITICAL matter is: The kind and quality of upbringing this  -brood received. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CRITICAL matter is: The kind and quality of upbringing this  -brood received. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connor Beaty</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4296102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connor Beaty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 02:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4296102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[great article ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4295774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4295774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I&#039;m actually a longstanding Ted Nugent fan with a few questions. Get real.&quot; 
 
That&#039;s your argument to show you&#039;re not confused? 
 
I rest my case. Try reading carefully and analyzing what is actually written. But don&#039;t despair, it&#039;s likely with a little discipline you can easily overcome your tendency to get confused.  When we look for examples, we try to think about saliency. When speaking about statistics and generalizations one can always find counter-examples. What&#039;s so confusing about that? Ted Nugent is only an archetype of someone who loves the A-chord. He&#039;s not a model for much else, other than turning his fame for A-chord mania in to a larger-than-life image you seem to be impressed by. No problem there, but what is the relevancy to the conversation here? 
 
What do we make of this? 
 
Nugent is OK. I saw him live when he still had long hair and I was very, very young. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;I&#039;m actually a longstanding Ted Nugent fan with a few questions. Get real.&quot; </p>
<p>That&#039;s your argument to show you&#039;re not confused? </p>
<p>I rest my case. Try reading carefully and analyzing what is actually written. But don&#039;t despair, it&#039;s likely with a little discipline you can easily overcome your tendency to get confused.  When we look for examples, we try to think about saliency. When speaking about statistics and generalizations one can always find counter-examples. What&#039;s so confusing about that? Ted Nugent is only an archetype of someone who loves the A-chord. He&#039;s not a model for much else, other than turning his fame for A-chord mania in to a larger-than-life image you seem to be impressed by. No problem there, but what is the relevancy to the conversation here? </p>
<p>What do we make of this? </p>
<p>Nugent is OK. I saw him live when he still had long hair and I was very, very young. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4295745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4295745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;&quot;Gay politics&quot; is the problem? What problems is it causing us, exactly?&quot; 
 
Gays adopting children. Gays demanding &quot;equality&quot; based on cultural hegemony. They don&#039;t want equal opportunity, they want the government to ensure that all others treat them with the respect they expect. It&#039;s based on their expectations and feelings. 
 
Most of it flows from those problems. 
 
&quot;I&#039;m not gay but really can&#039;t stand people are are bigoted against homosexuality.&quot; 
 
I defend gay rights, but only those that truly exist. They have the same rights I do. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;&quot;Gay politics&quot; is the problem? What problems is it causing us, exactly?&quot; </p>
<p>Gays adopting children. Gays demanding &quot;equality&quot; based on cultural hegemony. They don&#039;t want equal opportunity, they want the government to ensure that all others treat them with the respect they expect. It&#039;s based on their expectations and feelings. </p>
<p>Most of it flows from those problems. </p>
<p>&quot;I&#039;m not gay but really can&#039;t stand people are are bigoted against homosexuality.&quot; </p>
<p>I defend gay rights, but only those that truly exist. They have the same rights I do. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4295534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Sue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4295534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so that he may better concentrate on spreading the message of conservative, you doofus.  His brother is perpetuating the line which is good enough. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so that he may better concentrate on spreading the message of conservative, you doofus.  His brother is perpetuating the line which is good enough. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clarespark</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4295511</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clarespark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4295511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See my latest blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://clarespark.com/2013/02/21/discovery-anxiety/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://clarespark.com/2013/02/21/discovery-anxiet...&lt;/a&gt;. And follow the links. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See my latest blog <a href="http://clarespark.com/2013/02/21/discovery-anxiety/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://clarespark.com/2013/02/21/discovery-anxiet" rel="nofollow">http://clarespark.com/2013/02/21/discovery-anxiet</a>&#8230;. And follow the links. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim_C</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4295390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim_C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4295390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting article. I don&#039;t agree with much of it, but it provides food for thought about the direction of future policymaking, and I applaud the effort.  
  
One of the points I always return to here at FPM is that we really haven&#039;t been able to come to grips with the absolutely enormous social, economic, and technological changes of the 20th century. And that rate of change seems to be accelerating every day. The institution of the family is but one institution that has been gobsmacked by these changes. While the article certainly portrays Marx correctly, I disagree that Marx is at the root of the most important of these upheavals.  
  
The freedoms now enjoyed by women began to come about less than a century ago, and as those freedoms extended into economic freedom, we begin to see the family unit change. For better? For worse? Yes, both. There are many more divorces, many more single parents, and while these things aren&#039;t &quot;good,&quot; from the standpoint of individual freedom, they&#039;re much better than the alternative (Mom and Dad fighting, spousal abuse, abusive parenting, etc.)  
  
When you think of the halcyon days of the American family, you&#039;re thinking about a time when union membership was at its peak, allowing families to grow, save, and better themselves. So &quot;leftism&quot; in that case actually nurtured families.  
  
The successful family norm, now, entails two working parents. This has allowed for much financial gain--but not necessarily economic security. Most of us live paycheck to paycheck; we are still able to save, but those savings don&#039;t go as far given today&#039;s costs. So economic pressures are great, and can contribute to marital stress.  
  
I don&#039;t agree at all that the State, in the USA, is &quot;replacing the family,&quot; though. The State may or may not be becoming too unwieldy and inefficient and too enamored of selling us a bill of goods. It may be becoming a hindrance in its attempts to solve problems. But it is a long, long way from &quot;taking over&quot; that most important of society&#039;s building blocks. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. I don&#039;t agree with much of it, but it provides food for thought about the direction of future policymaking, and I applaud the effort.  </p>
<p>One of the points I always return to here at FPM is that we really haven&#039;t been able to come to grips with the absolutely enormous social, economic, and technological changes of the 20th century. And that rate of change seems to be accelerating every day. The institution of the family is but one institution that has been gobsmacked by these changes. While the article certainly portrays Marx correctly, I disagree that Marx is at the root of the most important of these upheavals.  </p>
<p>The freedoms now enjoyed by women began to come about less than a century ago, and as those freedoms extended into economic freedom, we begin to see the family unit change. For better? For worse? Yes, both. There are many more divorces, many more single parents, and while these things aren&#039;t &quot;good,&quot; from the standpoint of individual freedom, they&#039;re much better than the alternative (Mom and Dad fighting, spousal abuse, abusive parenting, etc.)  </p>
<p>When you think of the halcyon days of the American family, you&#039;re thinking about a time when union membership was at its peak, allowing families to grow, save, and better themselves. So &quot;leftism&quot; in that case actually nurtured families.  </p>
<p>The successful family norm, now, entails two working parents. This has allowed for much financial gain&#8211;but not necessarily economic security. Most of us live paycheck to paycheck; we are still able to save, but those savings don&#039;t go as far given today&#039;s costs. So economic pressures are great, and can contribute to marital stress.  </p>
<p>I don&#039;t agree at all that the State, in the USA, is &quot;replacing the family,&quot; though. The State may or may not be becoming too unwieldy and inefficient and too enamored of selling us a bill of goods. It may be becoming a hindrance in its attempts to solve problems. But it is a long, long way from &quot;taking over&quot; that most important of society&#039;s building blocks. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David of Edinburgh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4294933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David of Edinburgh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4294933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Solve all our problems&quot;? 
Meanwhile the animal kingdom continues to function within the parent/sibling family structure unabated. A structure that is free from the ravages of the intellectual vanity possessed by man which has created the needless problems affecting the same family structure.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Solve all our problems&quot;?<br />
Meanwhile the animal kingdom continues to function within the parent/sibling family structure unabated. A structure that is free from the ravages of the intellectual vanity possessed by man which has created the needless problems affecting the same family structure.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4294737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Questions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4294737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m actually a longstanding Ted Nugent fan with a few questions.  Get real.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m actually a longstanding Ted Nugent fan with a few questions.  Get real.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glennd1</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4293791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glennd1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4293791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Gay politics&quot; is the problem? What problems is it causing us, exactly? Please tell me. Fyi, I&#039;m not gay but really can&#039;t stand people are are bigoted against homosexuality.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Gay politics&quot; is the problem? What problems is it causing us, exactly? Please tell me. Fyi, I&#039;m not gay but really can&#039;t stand people are are bigoted against homosexuality.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KKKK</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4293558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KKKK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4293558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and soon, when those nurses and teachers (&quot; four teachers to an empty classroom and eight nurses to an empty hospital&quot;) die, there will not be any skilled person to replace them... because they all were aborted or were never born due to the childless policy. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and soon, when those nurses and teachers (&quot; four teachers to an empty classroom and eight nurses to an empty hospital&quot;) die, there will not be any skilled person to replace them&#8230; because they all were aborted or were never born due to the childless policy. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4293145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4293145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the &quot;gay agenda&quot;? 
 
Is this a serious question? 
 
&quot;You do realize the homosexual population is not growing&quot; 
 
Their influence and demands are growing. 
 
&quot; that it is not spread as an idea or something, yes?&quot; 
 
Wrong. You&#039;re saying some politically active gays don&#039;t have ideas about how we should run our government and society base on ideas about their sexuality (which they define as gay)? Don&#039;t ask don&#039;t tell...no, there is no gay agenda. Of course not. There are multiple gay agendas. 
 
&quot;The bottom line is that homosexuality is a result of fetal exposure to hormones.&quot; 
 
Really? Wow. Even if that turned out to be true, what does that matter? We don&#039;t have a problem with &quot;gay urges&quot; or &quot;gay desire&quot; but &quot;gay politics is the problem. It&#039;s the ideas about how some of the most vocal radicals expect us to mold society to accommodate their agendas. 
 
&quot;homosexuality isn&#039;t on the rise or corrupting us.&quot; 
 
Political homosexuality is. 
 
&quot;Judeo-Christian culture has brought at least as much suffering as it has light, if there even was such thing in the first place.&quot; 
 
What a bizarre argument.  
 
&quot;Our morality doesn&#039;t stem from christianity, it&#039;s reflected by it.&quot; 
 
It&#039;s not like anyone reads those texts eh? None of our ancestors read them. Since you didn&#039;t they couldn&#039;t have either. 
 
&quot;Our liberty stems from the non-spiritual ideas of the Greeks and Romans, not the Talmud or the preaching of Jesus.&quot; 
 
LOL!!!!!! That&#039;s the leftist-approved post-Christian dogma. You got that much correct. You&#039;re clueless about both. 
 
&quot;You and many others here just lump so many things together as &#039;radical left&#039; when in fact the world is just much more complicated than that.&quot; 
 
But nobody claimed the world wasn&#039;t complicated. 
 
&quot;But hey, at least you managed to drop some more blog links...&quot; 
 
Get over your petty jealousy. You&#039;re free to do the same but you know very well nobody cares about your rants. Although I personally get a laugh most of the time I probably wouldn&#039;t go to your blog. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the &quot;gay agenda&quot;? </p>
<p>Is this a serious question? </p>
<p>&quot;You do realize the homosexual population is not growing&quot; </p>
<p>Their influence and demands are growing. </p>
<p>&quot; that it is not spread as an idea or something, yes?&quot; </p>
<p>Wrong. You&#039;re saying some politically active gays don&#039;t have ideas about how we should run our government and society base on ideas about their sexuality (which they define as gay)? Don&#039;t ask don&#039;t tell&#8230;no, there is no gay agenda. Of course not. There are multiple gay agendas. </p>
<p>&quot;The bottom line is that homosexuality is a result of fetal exposure to hormones.&quot; </p>
<p>Really? Wow. Even if that turned out to be true, what does that matter? We don&#039;t have a problem with &quot;gay urges&quot; or &quot;gay desire&quot; but &quot;gay politics is the problem. It&#039;s the ideas about how some of the most vocal radicals expect us to mold society to accommodate their agendas. </p>
<p>&quot;homosexuality isn&#039;t on the rise or corrupting us.&quot; </p>
<p>Political homosexuality is. </p>
<p>&quot;Judeo-Christian culture has brought at least as much suffering as it has light, if there even was such thing in the first place.&quot; </p>
<p>What a bizarre argument.  </p>
<p>&quot;Our morality doesn&#039;t stem from christianity, it&#039;s reflected by it.&quot; </p>
<p>It&#039;s not like anyone reads those texts eh? None of our ancestors read them. Since you didn&#039;t they couldn&#039;t have either. </p>
<p>&quot;Our liberty stems from the non-spiritual ideas of the Greeks and Romans, not the Talmud or the preaching of Jesus.&quot; </p>
<p>LOL!!!!!! That&#039;s the leftist-approved post-Christian dogma. You got that much correct. You&#039;re clueless about both. </p>
<p>&quot;You and many others here just lump so many things together as &#039;radical left&#039; when in fact the world is just much more complicated than that.&quot; </p>
<p>But nobody claimed the world wasn&#039;t complicated. </p>
<p>&quot;But hey, at least you managed to drop some more blog links&#8230;&quot; </p>
<p>Get over your petty jealousy. You&#039;re free to do the same but you know very well nobody cares about your rants. Although I personally get a laugh most of the time I probably wouldn&#039;t go to your blog. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevefraser</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4293063</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stevefraser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4293063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But the bourgeois family is a cultural/social evolutionary advance. Marx hates it because he deifies an insane society defined by no private property (another social/cultual advance), no money, no family structure and no markets. Hate is at the core of the Left, a true death cult. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the bourgeois family is a cultural/social evolutionary advance. Marx hates it because he deifies an insane society defined by no private property (another social/cultual advance), no money, no family structure and no markets. Hate is at the core of the Left, a true death cult. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevefraser</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4293054</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stevefraser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4293054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The primary goal is not to destroy the family but to grow a huge central state that defines reality and is always right...The traditional family is an impediment to this goal.....which is why Marx hated the family, along with Hitler. See &quot;Liberal Fascism&quot; by J. Goldberg for the historical details of the growth and deification of the State. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The primary goal is not to destroy the family but to grow a huge central state that defines reality and is always right&#8230;The traditional family is an impediment to this goal&#8230;..which is why Marx hated the family, along with Hitler. See &quot;Liberal Fascism&quot; by J. Goldberg for the historical details of the growth and deification of the State. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevefraser</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4293040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stevefraser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4293040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You forgot the growth of a huge central state which defines reality and is always right.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot the growth of a huge central state which defines reality and is always right.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevefraser</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4293011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stevefraser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4293011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AFDC is the most destructive of all the Left&#039;s attacks on the family. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AFDC is the most destructive of all the Left&#039;s attacks on the family. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Bargholz</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4292929</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Bargholz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 06:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4292929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greenfield,  
 
this is a very good article. Bastiat was right about socialist elites using the state to plunder a society&#039;s wealth while encouraging the masses to try to live off the other guy&#039;s dime. Describing it as a pyramid scheme is simple and accurate. 
 
Obama&#039;s handlers have him enforcing this system like a mentally retarded regent because he&#039;s much too stupid to have thought of it himself. I think  Americans went to sleep as citizens (barely) before he was installed and woke up as employees afterwards. Pretty soon we could end up as proles. 
 
Do you think America will Balkanize soon, or even worse, cease to exist as the country that was founded on the Constitution? Sounds crazy, I know, but I think the changes the Obama Administration is wreaking with so little opposition are even crazier.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greenfield,  </p>
<p>this is a very good article. Bastiat was right about socialist elites using the state to plunder a society&#039;s wealth while encouraging the masses to try to live off the other guy&#039;s dime. Describing it as a pyramid scheme is simple and accurate. </p>
<p>Obama&#039;s handlers have him enforcing this system like a mentally retarded regent because he&#039;s much too stupid to have thought of it himself. I think  Americans went to sleep as citizens (barely) before he was installed and woke up as employees afterwards. Pretty soon we could end up as proles. </p>
<p>Do you think America will Balkanize soon, or even worse, cease to exist as the country that was founded on the Constitution? Sounds crazy, I know, but I think the changes the Obama Administration is wreaking with so little opposition are even crazier.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cynthia curran</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4292775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cynthia curran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4292775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
think the situation in Canada is even worse than in the United States. The notion of the nuclear family -- that is, husband, wife, children -- has been defunct for decades. For years income tax rewarded common law couples (under Liberal regimes common law couples paid far less in taxes than married couples. They taxed, penalized, those who married.) Now with gay marriage, it is considered a gender crime to employ on a marriage certificate the terms &quot;husband&quot; or &quot;wife&quot; -- we must all be asexual entities. As I laugh. And geniuses who devise such things are typically members of Canada&#039;s ultra-Leftist Supreme Court -- these justices are who actually rule Canada.  
 Well, Mexico has a lot of common law marriage and Gay Marriage is excepted inMexico City but you here Norquist and company talk about conservative social values with Hispanics. 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
think the situation in Canada is even worse than in the United States. The notion of the nuclear family &#8212; that is, husband, wife, children &#8212; has been defunct for decades. For years income tax rewarded common law couples (under Liberal regimes common law couples paid far less in taxes than married couples. They taxed, penalized, those who married.) Now with gay marriage, it is considered a gender crime to employ on a marriage certificate the terms &quot;husband&quot; or &quot;wife&quot; &#8212; we must all be asexual entities. As I laugh. And geniuses who devise such things are typically members of Canada&#039;s ultra-Leftist Supreme Court &#8212; these justices are who actually rule Canada.<br />
 Well, Mexico has a lot of common law marriage and Gay Marriage is excepted inMexico City but you here Norquist and company talk about conservative social values with Hispanics. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cynthia curran</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/who-needs-the-family/comment-page-1/#comment-4292770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cynthia curran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 05:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=178314#comment-4292770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well i&#039;m in the middle, we need to reduce Hispanic birthrates in order to not have the problems that Hispanics have with income and gangs and out of wedlock births. I&#039;m glad that Mexico birthrate is dropping. Some of the high birthrate crowd want a lot of immirgation and high birthrates from Hispancs that have more poverty issues than whites and keeping the birthrates high in Mexico means more illegal immirgants here ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well i&#039;m in the middle, we need to reduce Hispanic birthrates in order to not have the problems that Hispanics have with income and gangs and out of wedlock births. I&#039;m glad that Mexico birthrate is dropping. Some of the high birthrate crowd want a lot of immirgation and high birthrates from Hispancs that have more poverty issues than whites and keeping the birthrates high in Mexico means more illegal immirgants here </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 706/743 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 07:49:08 by W3 Total Cache -->