<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Foreign Policy Disasters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/obamas-foreign-policy-disasters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/obamas-foreign-policy-disasters/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obamas-foreign-policy-disasters</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 01:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Lanna</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/obamas-foreign-policy-disasters/comment-page-1/#comment-5326245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lanna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=212844#comment-5326245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nuclear deal between the US and Iran last month was deemed successful until the facts came out.  Iran is now lashing out at the US for releasing a modified version of the agreement to the American people that does not reflect its interpretation.   The Arak water reactor may be the biggest sticking point.  In the Geneva Agreement, Iran commits itself to not making any further advances of its activities at a number of nuclear sites including the Arak Reactor.  The Joint Plan of Action states that a final agreement would fully resolve concerns related to the reactor Arak, with the goal of ensuring there is NO reprocessing or construction of a facility capable of reprocessing.    According to the White House fact sheet, this means that Iran has committed to no further advances of its activities at Arak and to halt progress on its plutonium track.  The White House listed seven limitations related to Iran...Iran cannot: 
1 commission operationalize the Arak reactor.
2 Fuel the Arak reactor.
3. Produce fuel for the Arak reactor.
4. Test fuel for the Arak reactor.
5 Install any additional reactor components at Arak.
6. Transfer fuel and heavy water to the reactor site.
7. Construct a facility capable of reprocessing (to separate plutonium from spent fuel.)   According to Reuters, Iran could build components off-site to install later. The Iranian Minister Javad Zarif told the Majles that while no new nuclear fuel will be produced and no new installations will be installed...construction will continue.  Even Jen Psaki  with the State Department said, &quot;We&#039;re not exactly sure what he means by construction in the comments...will there be no work on the reactor, no work to prepare fuel for the reactor, or will there be additional testing of the reactor.    Iranian officials repeatedly say that Iran will not dismantle its nuclear enrichment sites.   So what has been accomplished if they continue on a path of getting nuclear weapons...Iran has all the oil and gas they could ever need for energy...they want nuclear weapons for much more sinister deeds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nuclear deal between the US and Iran last month was deemed successful until the facts came out.  Iran is now lashing out at the US for releasing a modified version of the agreement to the American people that does not reflect its interpretation.   The Arak water reactor may be the biggest sticking point.  In the Geneva Agreement, Iran commits itself to not making any further advances of its activities at a number of nuclear sites including the Arak Reactor.  The Joint Plan of Action states that a final agreement would fully resolve concerns related to the reactor Arak, with the goal of ensuring there is NO reprocessing or construction of a facility capable of reprocessing.    According to the White House fact sheet, this means that Iran has committed to no further advances of its activities at Arak and to halt progress on its plutonium track.  The White House listed seven limitations related to Iran&#8230;Iran cannot:<br />
1 commission operationalize the Arak reactor.<br />
2 Fuel the Arak reactor.<br />
3. Produce fuel for the Arak reactor.<br />
4. Test fuel for the Arak reactor.<br />
5 Install any additional reactor components at Arak.<br />
6. Transfer fuel and heavy water to the reactor site.<br />
7. Construct a facility capable of reprocessing (to separate plutonium from spent fuel.)   According to Reuters, Iran could build components off-site to install later. The Iranian Minister Javad Zarif told the Majles that while no new nuclear fuel will be produced and no new installations will be installed&#8230;construction will continue.  Even Jen Psaki  with the State Department said, &#8220;We&#8217;re not exactly sure what he means by construction in the comments&#8230;will there be no work on the reactor, no work to prepare fuel for the reactor, or will there be additional testing of the reactor.    Iranian officials repeatedly say that Iran will not dismantle its nuclear enrichment sites.   So what has been accomplished if they continue on a path of getting nuclear weapons&#8230;Iran has all the oil and gas they could ever need for energy&#8230;they want nuclear weapons for much more sinister deeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAthena</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/obamas-foreign-policy-disasters/comment-page-1/#comment-5325697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PAthena]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frontpagemag.com/?p=212844#comment-5325697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(1)  President Barack Hussein Obama gave a speech in Cairo in which he promised to defend Mohammedanism (or something to that effect).  He showed his ignorance - if not his dishonesty - by crediting Mohammedanism with the invention of the printing press (Johannes Gutenberg in Mainz was not a Mohammedan), the invention of the compass (the Chinese were not Mohammedans), and the first university (the Italians who founded the first university, I think in Bologna, were not Mohammedans).
(2)  He defends Mohammedanism at all costs, ordering the FBI to remove any mention of jihad in its manuals.  He changes the name of Mohammedan jihad to &quot;workplace violence&quot; when the perpetrator of the murder of American soldiers in Fort Hood, Nidal Hassan, proudly said that he murdered them for religious reasons, shouting &quot;Allahu Akbar&quot; as he mowed them down.
(2)  He is at best an ignoramus, or again, a liar supporting the enemies of the United States and attacking its allies.  The United States used the Marshall Plan after World War II to help restore both its allies and its former enemies.  What other country has ever done that?
(3)  He returned the bust of Winston Churchill to Great Britain which had been given to President Bush after 9/11. ( I wonder if that means that he would have supported Hitler Germany. )   Around the same time, he bowed to the king of Saudi Arabia.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(1)  President Barack Hussein Obama gave a speech in Cairo in which he promised to defend Mohammedanism (or something to that effect).  He showed his ignorance &#8211; if not his dishonesty &#8211; by crediting Mohammedanism with the invention of the printing press (Johannes Gutenberg in Mainz was not a Mohammedan), the invention of the compass (the Chinese were not Mohammedans), and the first university (the Italians who founded the first university, I think in Bologna, were not Mohammedans).<br />
(2)  He defends Mohammedanism at all costs, ordering the FBI to remove any mention of jihad in its manuals.  He changes the name of Mohammedan jihad to &#8220;workplace violence&#8221; when the perpetrator of the murder of American soldiers in Fort Hood, Nidal Hassan, proudly said that he murdered them for religious reasons, shouting &#8220;Allahu Akbar&#8221; as he mowed them down.<br />
(2)  He is at best an ignoramus, or again, a liar supporting the enemies of the United States and attacking its allies.  The United States used the Marshall Plan after World War II to help restore both its allies and its former enemies.  What other country has ever done that?<br />
(3)  He returned the bust of Winston Churchill to Great Britain which had been given to President Bush after 9/11. ( I wonder if that means that he would have supported Hitler Germany. )   Around the same time, he bowed to the king of Saudi Arabia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 330/333 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 20:20:37 by W3 Total Cache -->