<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Haunting Design of ObamaCare &#8212; on The Glazov Gang</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=when-obama-said-hes-sorry</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: smrstrauss</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5316569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smrstrauss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5316569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turning now to the &quot;born in Kenya&quot; story: It is as nutty as nutty can be.

The “born in Kenya” story is the height of the loony side of the birther movement. It is based on forgeries like that of Lucas D. Smith, and falsifications–such as the claim that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya—when she actually said right on the same tape that he was born IN HAWAII, and she said in another interview that the first that her family in Kenya had heard of Obama’s birth was in a letter FROM HAWAII.

 

Lucas D. Smith, a convicted felon, claimed that he went to Kenya and got Obama’s birth certificate at a hospital in Mombasa. But Lucas D. Smith has constantly refused to show proof that he, Smith, had ever gone to Kenya. All that he would have to do would be to show a Kenya stamp on a page of a passport, but Lucas D. Smith has refused to do that, constantly, and he has also constantly refused to say why he will not show that proof. (Moreover, his “birth certificate” uses US date formats [month/day/year] and not the day/month/year 
format used in Kenya.) 

 

Laying aside for a moment the overwhelming proof that Obama was born in Hawaii, the evidence that Obama was NOT born in Kenya is also very strong. There 
were a grand total of 21 people who came to the USA from Kenya in 1961. Of these only seven were US citizens. And the birther myth has always been that Obama’s parents went there and returned by plane, but only one person came to the USA from Kenya in 1961 by plane and that person was, wait for it, NOT a US citizen. And Obama’s father did not go to Kenya in 1961 either (making it unlikely that his mother did, since travel late in pregnancy was rare, and even more rare 
without the husband going along). WND has proved with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961.

 

And the Kenyan government investigated the “born in Kenya” story, and found  that it was not true.

 

“Jon Chessoni, a first secretary at the Kenyan Embassy in Washington, can’t understand why his office gets so many baseless questions about whether Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

 

“It’s madness,” said Chessoni on Monday.“His father, in 1961, would not even have been in Kenya. When this matter first came up, the Kenyan government 
did its research and confirmed that these are all baseless claims.””

 

http://washingtonindependent.com/53654/forged 
…

 

Obama has a Hawaii birth certificate that says that he was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, and the officials of both parties in Hawaii have 
confirmed that fact. It is also confirmed by the birth announcement in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961, which were sent to the papers only by the DOH of 
Hawaii. 

Obama’s birth announcement appeared in a section of the newspapers called Health Bureau Statistics. As the name indicates, and as the papers and the DOH 
also say, ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could send birth notices to the Health Bureau Statistics section of the paper. And the DOH only sent out those notices for 
children that it had issued birth certificates for, and in 1961 the DOH was not allowed to register the births of children who were not born in Hawaii.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turning now to the &#8220;born in Kenya&#8221; story: It is as nutty as nutty can be.</p>
<p>The “born in Kenya” story is the height of the loony side of the birther movement. It is based on forgeries like that of Lucas D. Smith, and falsifications–such as the claim that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya—when she actually said right on the same tape that he was born IN HAWAII, and she said in another interview that the first that her family in Kenya had heard of Obama’s birth was in a letter FROM HAWAII.</p>
<p>Lucas D. Smith, a convicted felon, claimed that he went to Kenya and got Obama’s birth certificate at a hospital in Mombasa. But Lucas D. Smith has constantly refused to show proof that he, Smith, had ever gone to Kenya. All that he would have to do would be to show a Kenya stamp on a page of a passport, but Lucas D. Smith has refused to do that, constantly, and he has also constantly refused to say why he will not show that proof. (Moreover, his “birth certificate” uses US date formats [month/day/year] and not the day/month/year<br />
format used in Kenya.) </p>
<p>Laying aside for a moment the overwhelming proof that Obama was born in Hawaii, the evidence that Obama was NOT born in Kenya is also very strong. There<br />
were a grand total of 21 people who came to the USA from Kenya in 1961. Of these only seven were US citizens. And the birther myth has always been that Obama’s parents went there and returned by plane, but only one person came to the USA from Kenya in 1961 by plane and that person was, wait for it, NOT a US citizen. And Obama’s father did not go to Kenya in 1961 either (making it unlikely that his mother did, since travel late in pregnancy was rare, and even more rare<br />
without the husband going along). WND has proved with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961.</p>
<p>And the Kenyan government investigated the “born in Kenya” story, and found  that it was not true.</p>
<p>“Jon Chessoni, a first secretary at the Kenyan Embassy in Washington, can’t understand why his office gets so many baseless questions about whether Barack Obama was born in Kenya.</p>
<p>“It’s madness,” said Chessoni on Monday.“His father, in 1961, would not even have been in Kenya. When this matter first came up, the Kenyan government<br />
did its research and confirmed that these are all baseless claims.””</p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/53654/forged" rel="nofollow">http://washingtonindependent.com/53654/forged</a><br />
…</p>
<p>Obama has a Hawaii birth certificate that says that he was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, and the officials of both parties in Hawaii have<br />
confirmed that fact. It is also confirmed by the birth announcement in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961, which were sent to the papers only by the DOH of<br />
Hawaii. </p>
<p>Obama’s birth announcement appeared in a section of the newspapers called Health Bureau Statistics. As the name indicates, and as the papers and the DOH<br />
also say, ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could send birth notices to the Health Bureau Statistics section of the paper. And the DOH only sent out those notices for<br />
children that it had issued birth certificates for, and in 1961 the DOH was not allowed to register the births of children who were not born in Hawaii.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smrstrauss</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5316566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smrstrauss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2013 19:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5316566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama NEVER said that he was born in Kenya. However, there is a FORGED video in which birthers claim that he said that he was born in Kenya. (I wonder why birthers would FORGE a video in which they claim that he said that he was born in Kenya? [It is easy to see that the video is forged because you cannot see his mouth move and there is no reaction from the audience].) Birthers have also forged a several &quot;Kenyan birth certificates&quot;---I wonder why they would do that? And birther sites LIED when they said that Obama&#039;s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya. The tape recording shows that she said repeatedly that he was BORN IN HAWAII, &quot;where his father was studying at the time.&quot;  Birther sites simply did not quote that and cut off the tape recording just before she was asked &quot;where was he born?&quot; (I wonder why they would do that?????)

The evidence of Obama being born in Hawaii is overwhelming:

The officials of both parties in Hawaii have repeatedly stated in writing and in court papers that the FACTS on Obama&#039;s birth certificate are identical to those on the short form and long form BCs that they sent to him.  And they both say that Obama was born in HAWAII.  

THAT is in addition to the Index Data file that shows that Obama had a Hawaii birth certificate issued in 1961 and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers that were from the Department of Health of Hawaii back in 1961 (and only the DOH of Hawaii could send notices to the &quot;Health Bureau Statistics&quot; section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.) And that is in addition to the Hawaii teacher whose father&#039;s name was Stanley (it really was, I&#039;ve checked) and who said that she was told of the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley and that she wrote up that little tidbit and sent the letter to her father. (Are you claiming that Obama was able to find a teacher in Hawaii who had a father named Stanley and got her to lie about hearing about the birth of a child to a woman named Stanley?)

And, guess what, we do not even know that Obama&#039;s mother had a passport in 1961-----and very very few 18-year-olds did. And even fewer women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 because of the high risk of stillbirths. Yet birther sites hope that GULLIBLE people will assume that Obama&#039;s mother was one of the very very few 18-year-olds to have a passport and also one of the EXTREMELY few women who traveled abroad late in pregnancy---and that the birth certificate is forged and the officials of BOTH parties lying about it (and the Index Data and the birth notices and the teacher who wrote home).

Here, by the way, are links to some (by no means all) of the confirmation documents from the officials in Hawaii. Notice that several of them say that the facts &quot;MATCH.&quot;

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-birth-certificate/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama NEVER said that he was born in Kenya. However, there is a FORGED video in which birthers claim that he said that he was born in Kenya. (I wonder why birthers would FORGE a video in which they claim that he said that he was born in Kenya? [It is easy to see that the video is forged because you cannot see his mouth move and there is no reaction from the audience].) Birthers have also forged a several &#8220;Kenyan birth certificates&#8221;&#8212;I wonder why they would do that? And birther sites LIED when they said that Obama&#8217;s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya. The tape recording shows that she said repeatedly that he was BORN IN HAWAII, &#8220;where his father was studying at the time.&#8221;  Birther sites simply did not quote that and cut off the tape recording just before she was asked &#8220;where was he born?&#8221; (I wonder why they would do that?????)</p>
<p>The evidence of Obama being born in Hawaii is overwhelming:</p>
<p>The officials of both parties in Hawaii have repeatedly stated in writing and in court papers that the FACTS on Obama&#8217;s birth certificate are identical to those on the short form and long form BCs that they sent to him.  And they both say that Obama was born in HAWAII.  </p>
<p>THAT is in addition to the Index Data file that shows that Obama had a Hawaii birth certificate issued in 1961 and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers that were from the Department of Health of Hawaii back in 1961 (and only the DOH of Hawaii could send notices to the &#8220;Health Bureau Statistics&#8221; section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.) And that is in addition to the Hawaii teacher whose father&#8217;s name was Stanley (it really was, I&#8217;ve checked) and who said that she was told of the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley and that she wrote up that little tidbit and sent the letter to her father. (Are you claiming that Obama was able to find a teacher in Hawaii who had a father named Stanley and got her to lie about hearing about the birth of a child to a woman named Stanley?)</p>
<p>And, guess what, we do not even know that Obama&#8217;s mother had a passport in 1961&#8212;&#8211;and very very few 18-year-olds did. And even fewer women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 because of the high risk of stillbirths. Yet birther sites hope that GULLIBLE people will assume that Obama&#8217;s mother was one of the very very few 18-year-olds to have a passport and also one of the EXTREMELY few women who traveled abroad late in pregnancy&#8212;and that the birth certificate is forged and the officials of BOTH parties lying about it (and the Index Data and the birth notices and the teacher who wrote home).</p>
<p>Here, by the way, are links to some (by no means all) of the confirmation documents from the officials in Hawaii. Notice that several of them say that the facts &#8220;MATCH.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-birth-certificate/" rel="nofollow">http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-birth-certificate/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sendtheclunkerbacktochicago</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5316044</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sendtheclunkerbacktochicago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2013 04:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5316044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you and your other evil friends won&#039;t be completely shocked when the roof comes crashing in on this Fraud in Chief&#039;s head go to bed listening to this most recent update by Lt. Mike Zullo.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxw7RS-DZM#t=522]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you and your other evil friends won&#8217;t be completely shocked when the roof comes crashing in on this Fraud in Chief&#8217;s head go to bed listening to this most recent update by Lt. Mike Zullo.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxw7RS-DZM#t=522" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxw7RS-DZM#t=522</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sendtheclunkerbacktochicago</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5333347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sendtheclunkerbacktochicago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2013 04:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5333347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here suck on this for a little while.  Obama worse nightmare is about to come crashing down on him and his corrupt administration.  I call this Mutt names because he has committed the biggest fraud ever committed against this nation and he deserves nothing less than a lethal injection for all the pain and suffering he has caused all of us.  Hell, you don&#039;t even realize that he is bringing all this about intentionally and shame on you for defending and attempting to explain his fraudulent activity. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxw7RS-DZM#t=522]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here suck on this for a little while.  Obama worse nightmare is about to come crashing down on him and his corrupt administration.  I call this Mutt names because he has committed the biggest fraud ever committed against this nation and he deserves nothing less than a lethal injection for all the pain and suffering he has caused all of us.  Hell, you don&#8217;t even realize that he is bringing all this about intentionally and shame on you for defending and attempting to explain his fraudulent activity. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxw7RS-DZM#t=522" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGxw7RS-DZM#t=522</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NJK</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5316031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NJK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2013 03:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5316031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate him.  And also, he said himself he was born in Kenya.  That was before he said Hawaii.  Which is it?  

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/The-Vetting-Barack-Obama-Literary-Agent-1991-Born-in-Kenya-Raised-Indonesia-Hawaii

You say there&#039;s no proof he was born in Kenya.  There&#039;s no proof he was born in Hawaii.  In 1961 it was taboo to have a baby out of wedlock.  Then you add the fact that the baby is biracial, and this is probably why his mother went to Kenya and was given Obama Sr.&#039;s name.  His real father is Frank Marshall Davis, and he&#039;s looking more and more like him everyday.

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=obama+and+frank+marshall+davis&amp;qpvt=obama+and+frank+marshall+davis&amp;FORM=IGRE#view=detail&amp;id=E5C6BE04D2B2C467D0B3576EC1294C58467BADA7&amp;selectedIndex=33]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate him.  And also, he said himself he was born in Kenya.  That was before he said Hawaii.  Which is it?  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/The-Vetting-Barack-Obama-Literary-Agent-1991-Born-in-Kenya-Raised-Indonesia-Hawaii" rel="nofollow">http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/The-Vetting-Barack-Obama-Literary-Agent-1991-Born-in-Kenya-Raised-Indonesia-Hawaii</a></p>
<p>You say there&#8217;s no proof he was born in Kenya.  There&#8217;s no proof he was born in Hawaii.  In 1961 it was taboo to have a baby out of wedlock.  Then you add the fact that the baby is biracial, and this is probably why his mother went to Kenya and was given Obama Sr.&#8217;s name.  His real father is Frank Marshall Davis, and he&#8217;s looking more and more like him everyday.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=obama+and+frank+marshall+davis&#038;qpvt=obama+and+frank+marshall+davis&#038;FORM=IGRE#view=detail&#038;id=E5C6BE04D2B2C467D0B3576EC1294C58467BADA7&#038;selectedIndex=33" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=obama+and+frank+marshall+davis&#038;qpvt=obama+and+frank+marshall+davis&#038;FORM=IGRE#view=detail&#038;id=E5C6BE04D2B2C467D0B3576EC1294C58467BADA7&#038;selectedIndex=33</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sendtheclunkerbacktochicago</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5333193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sendtheclunkerbacktochicago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5333193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that is really funny!  You couldn&#039;t come up with something better.  Hell he didn&#039;t publish is April 27th, 2011 computer generated document either, someone else did, it is still a forgery.  That is Obama&#039;s Selective Service registration.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that is really funny!  You couldn&#8217;t come up with something better.  Hell he didn&#8217;t publish is April 27th, 2011 computer generated document either, someone else did, it is still a forgery.  That is Obama&#8217;s Selective Service registration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smrstrauss</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5315873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smrstrauss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5315873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Resolution 511 was an attempt to prove that McCain WAS eligible. And it did so by pointing out that he had two citizen parents and he was born on a US Naval base. 

That, duh, does not mean that everybody has to be born on a US Naval base to be eligible, and it does not mean that everybody needs two citizen parents in order to be eligible. McCain had two citizen parents, but the resolution does not say that others had to have two in order to be eligible. It did not even say that people have to have ONE citizen parent in order to be eligible. It just said that the US Senate believed that because McCain had two citizen parents and was born on a Naval base he was eligible.

There was no similar resolution for Obama because, duh, EVERYBODY KNEW THAT HE WAS ELIGIBLE.

Re the Puzo link.

Mario Apuzzo, a birther lawyer, is wrong. The Heritage Foundation book is right:

“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are &quot;natural born citizens&quot; and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are &quot;natural born citizens&quot; eligible to serve as President ...&quot;---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

Mario Apuzzo, a birther lawyer, is wrong, and these appeals court rulings are right:

Hollander v. McCain (New Hampshire 2008) ruling: “Those born “in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” U.S. Const., amend. XIV, have been considered American citizens under American law in effect since the time of the founding, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 674-75 (1898), and thus eligible for the presidency...&quot;

Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana (Indiana 2008 – Appellate Court) ruling: “Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”

Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling: “It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.”

Purpura v. Obama (New Jersey 2012) ruling: “No court, federal, state or administrative, has accepted the challengers’ position that Mr. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” due to the acknowledged fact that his father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen by virtue of the then applicable British Nationality Act. Nor has the fact that Obama had, or may have had, dual citizenship at the time of his birth and thereafter been held to deny him the status of natural born. It is unnecessary to reinvent the wheel here. … The petitioners’ legal position on this issue, however well intentioned, has no merit in law. Thus, accepting for the point of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a ‘natural born Citizen’ regardless of the status of his father.”

Voeltz v. Obama (Florida 2012) ruling: “However, the United States Supreme Court has concluded that ‘[e]very person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States. ‘Other courts that have considered the issue in the context of challenges to the qualifications of candidates for the office of President of the United States have come to the same conclusion.&quot; 

Allen v. Obama (Arizona 2012) ruling: “Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co. , 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986(1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. … Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise.” 

Farrar (et al.) v. Obama (Georgia 2012) ruling: “In 2009, the Indiana Court of Appeals (“Indiana Court”) addressed facts and issues similar to those before this court. [Ankeny] v. Governor, 916 N.E.2d (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). … The Indiana Court rejected the argument that Mr. Obama was ineligible, stating that children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. … This Court finds the decision and analysis of [Ankeny] persuasive.”

On October 1 of 2013, the US Supreme Court turned down an appeal of the last of the rulings shown above, the Farrar case, which had ruled that &quot;children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.&quot; By rejecting the appeal, the US Supreme Court allowed the ruling of the lower court to STAND.

In addition to those rulings specifically on presidential eligibility, there are these:

Mustata v. US Dept. of Justice, 179 F.3d 1017 (6th Cir. 1999) (children born in US to two Romanian citizens described as “natural born citizens” of the US):

“Petitioners Marian and Lenuta Mustata are citizens of Romania. At the time of their petition, they resided in Michigan with their two minor children, who are natural born citizens of the United States.” 

Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir. 1983) (child born in US to Mexican citizen is “natural born citizen” of US):

“Petitioner, Sebastian Diaz-Salazar, entered the United States illegally [from Mexico] in 1974 and has been living and working in Chicago since that time. *** The relevant facts which have been placed before the INS, BIA, and this court can be summarized as follows: The petitioner has a wife and two children under the age of three in Chicago; the children are natural-born citizens of the United States.”

Nwankpa v. Kissinger, 376 F. Supp. 122 (M.D. Ala. 1974) (child born in US to two Biafra citizens described as “natural born citizen” of the US):

“The Plaintiff was a native of Biafra, now a part of the Republic of Nigeria. His wife and two older children are also natives of that country, but his third child, a daughter, is a natural-born citizen of the United States.”
That makes about 13 courts that I can cite easily that have ruled that the US born children of foreigners are Natural Born Citizens.

In addition, there are articles like these:

http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574322281597739634.html?KEYWORDS=obama+%22natural+born+citizen%22+minor+happersett


http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/04/vattel-and-natural-born-citizen/
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Resolution 511 was an attempt to prove that McCain WAS eligible. And it did so by pointing out that he had two citizen parents and he was born on a US Naval base. </p>
<p>That, duh, does not mean that everybody has to be born on a US Naval base to be eligible, and it does not mean that everybody needs two citizen parents in order to be eligible. McCain had two citizen parents, but the resolution does not say that others had to have two in order to be eligible. It did not even say that people have to have ONE citizen parent in order to be eligible. It just said that the US Senate believed that because McCain had two citizen parents and was born on a Naval base he was eligible.</p>
<p>There was no similar resolution for Obama because, duh, EVERYBODY KNEW THAT HE WAS ELIGIBLE.</p>
<p>Re the Puzo link.</p>
<p>Mario Apuzzo, a birther lawyer, is wrong. The Heritage Foundation book is right:</p>
<p>“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are &#8220;natural born citizens&#8221; and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are &#8220;natural born citizens&#8221; eligible to serve as President &#8230;&#8221;&#8212;- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]</p>
<p>Mario Apuzzo, a birther lawyer, is wrong, and these appeals court rulings are right:</p>
<p>Hollander v. McCain (New Hampshire 2008) ruling: “Those born “in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” U.S. Const., amend. XIV, have been considered American citizens under American law in effect since the time of the founding, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 674-75 (1898), and thus eligible for the presidency&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana (Indiana 2008 – Appellate Court) ruling: “Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”</p>
<p>Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling: “It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.”</p>
<p>Purpura v. Obama (New Jersey 2012) ruling: “No court, federal, state or administrative, has accepted the challengers’ position that Mr. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” due to the acknowledged fact that his father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen by virtue of the then applicable British Nationality Act. Nor has the fact that Obama had, or may have had, dual citizenship at the time of his birth and thereafter been held to deny him the status of natural born. It is unnecessary to reinvent the wheel here. … The petitioners’ legal position on this issue, however well intentioned, has no merit in law. Thus, accepting for the point of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a ‘natural born Citizen’ regardless of the status of his father.”</p>
<p>Voeltz v. Obama (Florida 2012) ruling: “However, the United States Supreme Court has concluded that ‘[e]very person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States. ‘Other courts that have considered the issue in the context of challenges to the qualifications of candidates for the office of President of the United States have come to the same conclusion.&#8221; </p>
<p>Allen v. Obama (Arizona 2012) ruling: “Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co. , 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986(1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. … Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise.” </p>
<p>Farrar (et al.) v. Obama (Georgia 2012) ruling: “In 2009, the Indiana Court of Appeals (“Indiana Court”) addressed facts and issues similar to those before this court. [Ankeny] v. Governor, 916 N.E.2d (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). … The Indiana Court rejected the argument that Mr. Obama was ineligible, stating that children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. … This Court finds the decision and analysis of [Ankeny] persuasive.”</p>
<p>On October 1 of 2013, the US Supreme Court turned down an appeal of the last of the rulings shown above, the Farrar case, which had ruled that &#8220;children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.&#8221; By rejecting the appeal, the US Supreme Court allowed the ruling of the lower court to STAND.</p>
<p>In addition to those rulings specifically on presidential eligibility, there are these:</p>
<p>Mustata v. US Dept. of Justice, 179 F.3d 1017 (6th Cir. 1999) (children born in US to two Romanian citizens described as “natural born citizens” of the US):</p>
<p>“Petitioners Marian and Lenuta Mustata are citizens of Romania. At the time of their petition, they resided in Michigan with their two minor children, who are natural born citizens of the United States.” </p>
<p>Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir. 1983) (child born in US to Mexican citizen is “natural born citizen” of US):</p>
<p>“Petitioner, Sebastian Diaz-Salazar, entered the United States illegally [from Mexico] in 1974 and has been living and working in Chicago since that time. *** The relevant facts which have been placed before the INS, BIA, and this court can be summarized as follows: The petitioner has a wife and two children under the age of three in Chicago; the children are natural-born citizens of the United States.”</p>
<p>Nwankpa v. Kissinger, 376 F. Supp. 122 (M.D. Ala. 1974) (child born in US to two Biafra citizens described as “natural born citizen” of the US):</p>
<p>“The Plaintiff was a native of Biafra, now a part of the Republic of Nigeria. His wife and two older children are also natives of that country, but his third child, a daughter, is a natural-born citizen of the United States.”<br />
That makes about 13 courts that I can cite easily that have ruled that the US born children of foreigners are Natural Born Citizens.</p>
<p>In addition, there are articles like these:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012" rel="nofollow">http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012</a></p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574322281597739634.html?KEYWORDS=obama+%22natural+born+citizen%22+minor+happersett" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574322281597739634.html?KEYWORDS=obama+%22natural+born+citizen%22+minor+happersett</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/04/vattel-and-natural-born-citizen/" rel="nofollow">http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/04/vattel-and-natural-born-citizen/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smrstrauss</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5333190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smrstrauss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5333190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate Resolution 511 was an attempt to prove that McCain WAS eligible. And it did so by pointing out that he had two citizen parents and he was born on a US Naval base. 

That, duh, does not mean that everybody has to be born on a US Naval base to be eligible, and it does not mean that everybody needs two citizen parents in order to be eligible. McCain had two citizen parents, but the resolution does not say that others had to have two in order to be eligible. It did not even say that people have to have ONE citizen parent in order to be eligible. It just said that the US Senate believed that because McCain had two citizen parents and was born on a Naval base he was eligible.

There was no similar resolution for Obama because, duh, EVERYBODY KNEW THAT HE WAS ELIGIBLE.

Re the Puzo link.

Mario Apuzzo, a birther lawyer, is wrong. The Heritage Foundation book is right:

“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are &quot;natural born citizens&quot; and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are &quot;natural born citizens&quot; eligible to serve as President ...&quot;---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

Mario Apuzzo, a birther lawyer, is wrong, and these appeals court rulings are right:

Hollander v. McCain (New Hampshire 2008) ruling: “Those born “in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” U.S. Const., amend. XIV, have been considered American citizens under American law in effect since the time of the founding, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 674-75 (1898), and thus eligible for the presidency...&quot;

Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana (Indiana 2008 – Appellate Court) ruling: “Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”

Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling: “It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.”

Purpura v. Obama (New Jersey 2012) ruling: “No court, federal, state or administrative, has accepted the challengers’ position that Mr. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” due to the acknowledged fact that his father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen by virtue of the then applicable British Nationality Act. Nor has the fact that Obama had, or may have had, dual citizenship at the time of his birth and thereafter been held to deny him the status of natural born. It is unnecessary to reinvent the wheel here. … The petitioners’ legal position on this issue, however well intentioned, has no merit in law. Thus, accepting for the point of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a ‘natural born Citizen’ regardless of the status of his father.”

Voeltz v. Obama (Florida 2012) ruling: “However, the United States Supreme Court has concluded that ‘[e]very person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States. ‘Other courts that have considered the issue in the context of challenges to the qualifications of candidates for the office of President of the United States have come to the same conclusion.&quot; 

Allen v. Obama (Arizona 2012) ruling: “Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co. , 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986(1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. … Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise.” 

Farrar (et al.) v. Obama (Georgia 2012) ruling: “In 2009, the Indiana Court of Appeals (“Indiana Court”) addressed facts and issues similar to those before this court. [Ankeny] v. Governor, 916 N.E.2d (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). … The Indiana Court rejected the argument that Mr. Obama was ineligible, stating that children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. … This Court finds the decision and analysis of [Ankeny] persuasive.”

On October 1 of 2013, the US Supreme Court turned down an appeal of the last of the rulings shown above, the Farrar case, which had ruled that &quot;children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.&quot; By rejecting the appeal, the US Supreme Court allowed the ruling of the lower court to STAND.

In addition to those rulings specifically on presidential eligibility, there are these:

Mustata v. US Dept. of Justice, 179 F.3d 1017 (6th Cir. 1999) (children born in US to two Romanian citizens described as “natural born citizens” of the US):

“Petitioners Marian and Lenuta Mustata are citizens of Romania. At the time of their petition, they resided in Michigan with their two minor children, who are natural born citizens of the United States.” 

Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir. 1983) (child born in US to Mexican citizen is “natural born citizen” of US):

“Petitioner, Sebastian Diaz-Salazar, entered the United States illegally [from Mexico] in 1974 and has been living and working in Chicago since that time. *** The relevant facts which have been placed before the INS, BIA, and this court can be summarized as follows: The petitioner has a wife and two children under the age of three in Chicago; the children are natural-born citizens of the United States.”

Nwankpa v. Kissinger, 376 F. Supp. 122 (M.D. Ala. 1974) (child born in US to two Biafra citizens described as “natural born citizen” of the US):

“The Plaintiff was a native of Biafra, now a part of the Republic of Nigeria. His wife and two older children are also natives of that country, but his third child, a daughter, is a natural-born citizen of the United States.”
That makes about 13 courts that I can cite easily that have ruled that the US born children of foreigners are Natural Born Citizens.

In addition, there are articles like these:

http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574322281597739634.html?KEYWORDS=obama+%22natural+born+citizen%22+minor+happersett


http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/04/vattel-and-natural-born-citizen/
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Resolution 511 was an attempt to prove that McCain WAS eligible. And it did so by pointing out that he had two citizen parents and he was born on a US Naval base. </p>
<p>That, duh, does not mean that everybody has to be born on a US Naval base to be eligible, and it does not mean that everybody needs two citizen parents in order to be eligible. McCain had two citizen parents, but the resolution does not say that others had to have two in order to be eligible. It did not even say that people have to have ONE citizen parent in order to be eligible. It just said that the US Senate believed that because McCain had two citizen parents and was born on a Naval base he was eligible.</p>
<p>There was no similar resolution for Obama because, duh, EVERYBODY KNEW THAT HE WAS ELIGIBLE.</p>
<p>Re the Puzo link.</p>
<p>Mario Apuzzo, a birther lawyer, is wrong. The Heritage Foundation book is right:</p>
<p>“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are &#8220;natural born citizens&#8221; and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are &#8220;natural born citizens&#8221; eligible to serve as President &#8230;&#8221;&#8212;- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]</p>
<p>Mario Apuzzo, a birther lawyer, is wrong, and these appeals court rulings are right:</p>
<p>Hollander v. McCain (New Hampshire 2008) ruling: “Those born “in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” U.S. Const., amend. XIV, have been considered American citizens under American law in effect since the time of the founding, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 674-75 (1898), and thus eligible for the presidency&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana (Indiana 2008 – Appellate Court) ruling: “Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”</p>
<p>Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling: “It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.”</p>
<p>Purpura v. Obama (New Jersey 2012) ruling: “No court, federal, state or administrative, has accepted the challengers’ position that Mr. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” due to the acknowledged fact that his father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen by virtue of the then applicable British Nationality Act. Nor has the fact that Obama had, or may have had, dual citizenship at the time of his birth and thereafter been held to deny him the status of natural born. It is unnecessary to reinvent the wheel here. … The petitioners’ legal position on this issue, however well intentioned, has no merit in law. Thus, accepting for the point of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a ‘natural born Citizen’ regardless of the status of his father.”</p>
<p>Voeltz v. Obama (Florida 2012) ruling: “However, the United States Supreme Court has concluded that ‘[e]very person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States. ‘Other courts that have considered the issue in the context of challenges to the qualifications of candidates for the office of President of the United States have come to the same conclusion.&#8221; </p>
<p>Allen v. Obama (Arizona 2012) ruling: “Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co. , 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986(1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. … Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise.” </p>
<p>Farrar (et al.) v. Obama (Georgia 2012) ruling: “In 2009, the Indiana Court of Appeals (“Indiana Court”) addressed facts and issues similar to those before this court. [Ankeny] v. Governor, 916 N.E.2d (Ind. Ct. App. 2009). … The Indiana Court rejected the argument that Mr. Obama was ineligible, stating that children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. … This Court finds the decision and analysis of [Ankeny] persuasive.”</p>
<p>On October 1 of 2013, the US Supreme Court turned down an appeal of the last of the rulings shown above, the Farrar case, which had ruled that &#8220;children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.&#8221; By rejecting the appeal, the US Supreme Court allowed the ruling of the lower court to STAND.</p>
<p>In addition to those rulings specifically on presidential eligibility, there are these:</p>
<p>Mustata v. US Dept. of Justice, 179 F.3d 1017 (6th Cir. 1999) (children born in US to two Romanian citizens described as “natural born citizens” of the US):</p>
<p>“Petitioners Marian and Lenuta Mustata are citizens of Romania. At the time of their petition, they resided in Michigan with their two minor children, who are natural born citizens of the United States.” </p>
<p>Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir. 1983) (child born in US to Mexican citizen is “natural born citizen” of US):</p>
<p>“Petitioner, Sebastian Diaz-Salazar, entered the United States illegally [from Mexico] in 1974 and has been living and working in Chicago since that time. *** The relevant facts which have been placed before the INS, BIA, and this court can be summarized as follows: The petitioner has a wife and two children under the age of three in Chicago; the children are natural-born citizens of the United States.”</p>
<p>Nwankpa v. Kissinger, 376 F. Supp. 122 (M.D. Ala. 1974) (child born in US to two Biafra citizens described as “natural born citizen” of the US):</p>
<p>“The Plaintiff was a native of Biafra, now a part of the Republic of Nigeria. His wife and two older children are also natives of that country, but his third child, a daughter, is a natural-born citizen of the United States.”<br />
That makes about 13 courts that I can cite easily that have ruled that the US born children of foreigners are Natural Born Citizens.</p>
<p>In addition, there are articles like these:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012" rel="nofollow">http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012</a></p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574322281597739634.html?KEYWORDS=obama+%22natural+born+citizen%22+minor+happersett" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574322281597739634.html?KEYWORDS=obama+%22natural+born+citizen%22+minor+happersett</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/04/vattel-and-natural-born-citizen/" rel="nofollow">http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/04/vattel-and-natural-born-citizen/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smrstrauss</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5315868</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smrstrauss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5315868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More reading on  the subject:
 
http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/
 
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012
 
http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/04/vattel-and-natural-born-citizen/
 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause_of_the_U.S._Constitution
 
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/scotus-natural-born-citizen-a-compendium.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More reading on  the subject:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012" rel="nofollow">http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/04/vattel-and-natural-born-citizen/" rel="nofollow">http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/04/vattel-and-natural-born-citizen/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause_of_the_U.S._Constitution" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause_of_the_U.S._Constitution</a></p>
<p><a href="http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/scotus-natural-born-citizen-a-compendium.html" rel="nofollow">http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/scotus-natural-born-citizen-a-compendium.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smrstrauss</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5333185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smrstrauss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5333185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More reading on  the subject:
 
http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/
 
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012
 
http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/04/vattel-and-natural-born-citizen/
 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause_of_the_U.S._Constitution
 
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/scotus-natural-born-citizen-a-compendium.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More reading on  the subject:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012" rel="nofollow">http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/04/vattel-and-natural-born-citizen/" rel="nofollow">http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/04/vattel-and-natural-born-citizen/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause_of_the_U.S._Constitution" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause_of_the_U.S._Constitution</a></p>
<p><a href="http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/scotus-natural-born-citizen-a-compendium.html" rel="nofollow">http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/scotus-natural-born-citizen-a-compendium.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smrstrauss</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5315867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smrstrauss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5315867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because some Republican members of Congress wanted to make former California Governor Arnold Schwartzenegger, a naturalized US citizen, eligible to be president. The attempts were NOT to make Obama eligible because, duh, Obama IS ELIGIBLE.

“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those 
persons born within the United States are &quot;natural born citizens&quot; and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are &quot;natural born citizens&quot; eligible to serve as President ...&quot;---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.] 
 
&quot;Some birthers imagine that there is a difference between being a “citizen by birth” or a “native citizen”
 on the one hand and a “natural born” citizen on the other. “Eccentric” is too kind a word for this notion, which is either daft or dishonest. All three terms are identical in meaning.&quot;---The Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574322281597739634.html?KEYWORDS=obama+%22natural+born+citizen%22+minor+happersett)
 
&quot;Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.”---Senator Lindsay Graham (December 11, 2008 letter to constituents)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because some Republican members of Congress wanted to make former California Governor Arnold Schwartzenegger, a naturalized US citizen, eligible to be president. The attempts were NOT to make Obama eligible because, duh, Obama IS ELIGIBLE.</p>
<p>“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those<br />
persons born within the United States are &#8220;natural born citizens&#8221; and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are &#8220;natural born citizens&#8221; eligible to serve as President &#8230;&#8221;&#8212;- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.] </p>
<p>&#8220;Some birthers imagine that there is a difference between being a “citizen by birth” or a “native citizen”<br />
 on the one hand and a “natural born” citizen on the other. “Eccentric” is too kind a word for this notion, which is either daft or dishonest. All three terms are identical in meaning.&#8221;&#8212;The Wall Street Journal (<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574322281597739634.html?KEYWORDS=obama+%22natural+born+citizen%22+minor+happersett" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574322281597739634.html?KEYWORDS=obama+%22natural+born+citizen%22+minor+happersett</a>)</p>
<p>&#8220;Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.”&#8212;Senator Lindsay Graham (December 11, 2008 letter to constituents)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smrstrauss</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5333184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smrstrauss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5333184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because some Republican members of Congress wanted to make former California Governor Arnold Schwartzenegger, a naturalized US citizen, eligible to be president. The attempts were NOT to make Obama eligible because, duh, Obama IS ELIGIBLE.

“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those 
persons born within the United States are &quot;natural born citizens&quot; and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are &quot;natural born citizens&quot; eligible to serve as President ...&quot;---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.] 
 
&quot;Some birthers imagine that there is a difference between being a “citizen by birth” or a “native citizen”
 on the one hand and a “natural born” citizen on the other. “Eccentric” is too kind a word for this notion, which is either daft or dishonest. All three terms are identical in meaning.&quot;---The Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574322281597739634.html?KEYWORDS=obama+%22natural+born+citizen%22+minor+happersett)
 
&quot;Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.”---Senator Lindsay Graham (December 11, 2008 letter to constituents)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because some Republican members of Congress wanted to make former California Governor Arnold Schwartzenegger, a naturalized US citizen, eligible to be president. The attempts were NOT to make Obama eligible because, duh, Obama IS ELIGIBLE.</p>
<p>“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those<br />
persons born within the United States are &#8220;natural born citizens&#8221; and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are &#8220;natural born citizens&#8221; eligible to serve as President &#8230;&#8221;&#8212;- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.] </p>
<p>&#8220;Some birthers imagine that there is a difference between being a “citizen by birth” or a “native citizen”<br />
 on the one hand and a “natural born” citizen on the other. “Eccentric” is too kind a word for this notion, which is either daft or dishonest. All three terms are identical in meaning.&#8221;&#8212;The Wall Street Journal (<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574322281597739634.html?KEYWORDS=obama+%22natural+born+citizen%22+minor+happersett" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574322281597739634.html?KEYWORDS=obama+%22natural+born+citizen%22+minor+happersett</a>)</p>
<p>&#8220;Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.”&#8212;Senator Lindsay Graham (December 11, 2008 letter to constituents)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smrstrauss</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5315862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smrstrauss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5315862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You CLAIM that you do not hate Obama, but you call him names. You CLAIM not to hate Obama but you post an allegation that he had his Selective Service documents  forged. (They are forged, but since Obama never published him the ones that were published were, duh, forged by the guy who published them.)


Obama did not publish his Selective Service registration. It IS forged, but Obama did not and could not have done it (The guy who put it online did not even claim to have gotten it from Obama).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You CLAIM that you do not hate Obama, but you call him names. You CLAIM not to hate Obama but you post an allegation that he had his Selective Service documents  forged. (They are forged, but since Obama never published him the ones that were published were, duh, forged by the guy who published them.)</p>
<p>Obama did not publish his Selective Service registration. It IS forged, but Obama did not and could not have done it (The guy who put it online did not even claim to have gotten it from Obama).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smrstrauss</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5333179</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smrstrauss]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5333179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You CLAIM that you do not hate Obama, but you call him names. You CLAIM not to hate Obama but you post an allegation that he had his Selective Service documents  forged. (They are forged, but since Obama never published him the ones that were published were, duh, forged by the guy who published them.)


Obama did not publish his Selective Service registration. It IS forged, but Obama did not and could not have done it (The guy who put it online did not even claim to have gotten it from Obama).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You CLAIM that you do not hate Obama, but you call him names. You CLAIM not to hate Obama but you post an allegation that he had his Selective Service documents  forged. (They are forged, but since Obama never published him the ones that were published were, duh, forged by the guy who published them.)</p>
<p>Obama did not publish his Selective Service registration. It IS forged, but Obama did not and could not have done it (The guy who put it online did not even claim to have gotten it from Obama).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sendtheclunkerbacktochicago</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5315861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sendtheclunkerbacktochicago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5315861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So why were there some 8 attempts to change the &quot;natural born Citizen&quot; clause by Congress since 2003 if they didn&#039;t see it as a threat for their agenda (nothing to do with Obama, just wanted it changed)?   All 8 attempts failed, thank God. Not all of those involved the movie star governor either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why were there some 8 attempts to change the &#8220;natural born Citizen&#8221; clause by Congress since 2003 if they didn&#8217;t see it as a threat for their agenda (nothing to do with Obama, just wanted it changed)?   All 8 attempts failed, thank God. Not all of those involved the movie star governor either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sendtheclunkerbacktochicago</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5333178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sendtheclunkerbacktochicago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5333178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So why were there some 8 attempts to change the &quot;natural born Citizen&quot; clause by Congress since 2003 if they didn&#039;t see it as a threat for their agenda (nothing to do with Obama, just wanted it changed)?   All 8 attempts failed, thank God. Not all of those involved the movie star governor either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why were there some 8 attempts to change the &#8220;natural born Citizen&#8221; clause by Congress since 2003 if they didn&#8217;t see it as a threat for their agenda (nothing to do with Obama, just wanted it changed)?   All 8 attempts failed, thank God. Not all of those involved the movie star governor either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sendtheclunkerbacktochicago</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5315860</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sendtheclunkerbacktochicago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5315860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out Senate Resolution 511, you know the piece of crap the Democrats came up with when the left wing nut job original birthers attempted to prove McCain was not a &quot;natural born Citizen.&quot;  The idiots (they got it right) even understood that both PARENTS (notice the &quot;S&quot;) had to be citizens (again notice the &quot;S&quot;) at the time of the child&#039;s birth.  Obama, Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal had parents who were NOT citizens at the time of their birth.  Doesn&#039;t get any better than that.  Allow those following the comments decide by applying some simple logic.  

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/11/logic-and-defining-natural-born-citizen.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out Senate Resolution 511, you know the piece of crap the Democrats came up with when the left wing nut job original birthers attempted to prove McCain was not a &#8220;natural born Citizen.&#8221;  The idiots (they got it right) even understood that both PARENTS (notice the &#8220;S&#8221;) had to be citizens (again notice the &#8220;S&#8221;) at the time of the child&#8217;s birth.  Obama, Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal had parents who were NOT citizens at the time of their birth.  Doesn&#8217;t get any better than that.  Allow those following the comments decide by applying some simple logic.  </p>
<p><a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/11/logic-and-defining-natural-born-citizen.html" rel="nofollow">http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/11/logic-and-defining-natural-born-citizen.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sendtheclunkerbacktochicago</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5333177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sendtheclunkerbacktochicago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5333177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out Senate Resolution 511, you know the piece of crap the Democrats came up with when the left wing nut job original birthers attempted to prove McCain was not a &quot;natural born Citizen.&quot;  The idiots (they got it right) even understood that both PARENTS (notice the &quot;S&quot;) had to be citizens (again notice the &quot;S&quot;) at the time of the child&#039;s birth.  Obama, Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal had parents who were NOT citizens at the time of their birth.  Doesn&#039;t get any better than that.  Allow those following the comments decide by applying some simple logic.  

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/11/logic-and-defining-natural-born-citizen.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out Senate Resolution 511, you know the piece of crap the Democrats came up with when the left wing nut job original birthers attempted to prove McCain was not a &#8220;natural born Citizen.&#8221;  The idiots (they got it right) even understood that both PARENTS (notice the &#8220;S&#8221;) had to be citizens (again notice the &#8220;S&#8221;) at the time of the child&#8217;s birth.  Obama, Cruz, Rubio, and Jindal had parents who were NOT citizens at the time of their birth.  Doesn&#8217;t get any better than that.  Allow those following the comments decide by applying some simple logic.  </p>
<p><a href="http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/11/logic-and-defining-natural-born-citizen.html" rel="nofollow">http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/11/logic-and-defining-natural-born-citizen.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sendtheclunkerbacktochicago</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5315859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sendtheclunkerbacktochicago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5315859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t hate the Mutt in Chief, the Liar in Chief, the Fraud in Chief.  He is an elite con artist, nothing more nothing less.  Take this an put it in your pipe and smoke it, a 3 minute Youtube that folks can judge for themselves, simply done and probably the fraud that will take this man and his enablers to prison.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbkPh6NXZ7A]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t hate the Mutt in Chief, the Liar in Chief, the Fraud in Chief.  He is an elite con artist, nothing more nothing less.  Take this an put it in your pipe and smoke it, a 3 minute Youtube that folks can judge for themselves, simply done and probably the fraud that will take this man and his enablers to prison.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbkPh6NXZ7A" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbkPh6NXZ7A</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sendtheclunkerbacktochicago</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/frontpagemag-com/when-obama-said-hes-sorry/comment-page-1/#comment-5333176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sendtheclunkerbacktochicago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=210635#comment-5333176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t hate the Mutt in Chief, the Liar in Chief, the Fraud in Chief.  He is an elite con artist, nothing more nothing less.  Take this an put it in your pipe and smoke it, a 3 minute Youtube that folks can judge for themselves, simply done and probably the fraud that will take this man and his enablers to prison.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbkPh6NXZ7A]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t hate the Mutt in Chief, the Liar in Chief, the Fraud in Chief.  He is an elite con artist, nothing more nothing less.  Take this an put it in your pipe and smoke it, a 3 minute Youtube that folks can judge for themselves, simply done and probably the fraud that will take this man and his enablers to prison.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbkPh6NXZ7A" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xbkPh6NXZ7A</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 769/810 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 21:01:56 by W3 Total Cache -->