<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next to Anthony Bourdain, Paula Deen’s a Saint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 06:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Asamota</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5464363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Asamota]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5464363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I notice that the cubans here in America didn&#039;t make anyone aware of these &#039;black&#039; political prisoners in Cuba! In fact, the cubans here I&#039;ve found to be some of the most racist assholes I&#039;ve ever ran into! It&#039;s a shame that this is going on, but the cuban comunity here have never done anything to take up the black cause before, all of a sudden they&#039;re &#039;concerned&#039; about black people back in their old country! Yeah, what the fuck ever!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice that the cubans here in America didn&#8217;t make anyone aware of these &#8216;black&#8217; political prisoners in Cuba! In fact, the cubans here I&#8217;ve found to be some of the most racist assholes I&#8217;ve ever ran into! It&#8217;s a shame that this is going on, but the cuban comunity here have never done anything to take up the black cause before, all of a sudden they&#8217;re &#8216;concerned&#8217; about black people back in their old country! Yeah, what the fuck ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5255218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5255218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It was a poor documentary on the horrible lives Cubanos lead despite Bourdain&#039;s jesty humour.&quot;

It wasn&#039;t a documentary about the horrible lives of Cubans.  It was his standard one hour travel show focusing on food.  It is entertainment, not journalism.    

&quot;He could have said much more but he was on a mission to show the positive side of Fidel&#039;s Cuba. Lot of things he never said because he wanted to show the positive elements? of lift wing ideology.&quot;

He could have also done the standard lefty expose&#039; on how Cubans get free, First World healthcare.  He didn&#039;t.  You know why?  His show is a one hour travel show focusing on food.  It is entertainment, not journalism.

I saw the show. I wonder if you did. In fact, given that his is a one hour travel show focusing on food, he was quite pointed about the poverty he saw, lack of freedom, and Cubans&#039; reticence to complain about the government.  Which is actually pretty good considering it is a one hour travel show focusing on food.
  
He also went to Vietnam, and focused on the food, not the unfree government, because it is a one hour travel show focused on food.  

&quot;Bourdain refuses to go to Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. Hates Israel as do all leftists.&quot;

According to CNN, regarding the upcoming season which starts in September, 2013:  

&quot;The new season of the weekend lifestyle series will explore the food, culture and history and parts unknown within Spain...Israel...and India.&quot;

And that show from Israel will be a one hour travel show focusing on food.  

See how this works?  But of course, political radical see everything through the lens of political partisanship, don&#039;t they?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It was a poor documentary on the horrible lives Cubanos lead despite Bourdain&#8217;s jesty humour.&#8221;</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t a documentary about the horrible lives of Cubans.  It was his standard one hour travel show focusing on food.  It is entertainment, not journalism.    </p>
<p>&#8220;He could have said much more but he was on a mission to show the positive side of Fidel&#8217;s Cuba. Lot of things he never said because he wanted to show the positive elements? of lift wing ideology.&#8221;</p>
<p>He could have also done the standard lefty expose&#8217; on how Cubans get free, First World healthcare.  He didn&#8217;t.  You know why?  His show is a one hour travel show focusing on food.  It is entertainment, not journalism.</p>
<p>I saw the show. I wonder if you did. In fact, given that his is a one hour travel show focusing on food, he was quite pointed about the poverty he saw, lack of freedom, and Cubans&#8217; reticence to complain about the government.  Which is actually pretty good considering it is a one hour travel show focusing on food.</p>
<p>He also went to Vietnam, and focused on the food, not the unfree government, because it is a one hour travel show focused on food.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Bourdain refuses to go to Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. Hates Israel as do all leftists.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to CNN, regarding the upcoming season which starts in September, 2013:  </p>
<p>&#8220;The new season of the weekend lifestyle series will explore the food, culture and history and parts unknown within Spain&#8230;Israel&#8230;and India.&#8221;</p>
<p>And that show from Israel will be a one hour travel show focusing on food.  </p>
<p>See how this works?  But of course, political radical see everything through the lens of political partisanship, don&#8217;t they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Productivity Market</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5255109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Productivity Market]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5255109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps but Bourdain has expressed more hate towards Deen than to Castro.


It was a poor documentary on the horrible lives Cubanos lead despite Bourdain&#039;s jesty humour. He could have said much more but he was on a mission to show the positive side of Fidel&#039;s Cuba. Lot of things he never said because he wanted to show the positive elements? of lift wing ideology.


Bourdain refuses to go to Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. Hates Israel as do all leftists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps but Bourdain has expressed more hate towards Deen than to Castro.</p>
<p>It was a poor documentary on the horrible lives Cubanos lead despite Bourdain&#8217;s jesty humour. He could have said much more but he was on a mission to show the positive side of Fidel&#8217;s Cuba. Lot of things he never said because he wanted to show the positive elements? of lift wing ideology.</p>
<p>Bourdain refuses to go to Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. Hates Israel as do all leftists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5252813</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5252813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s pretty overwrought.  Bourdain went to Cuba, was forthright about the poverty and government impositions, and stated that he liked the food he was served.  That&#039;s all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty overwrought.  Bourdain went to Cuba, was forthright about the poverty and government impositions, and stated that he liked the food he was served.  That&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gislia Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5252612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gislia Jackson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 12:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5252612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saying that an undeveloped hellhole like Cuba has great food is a bellwether for for that leftist&#039;s thought.  Sort of like being a well known reporter visiting Stalin&#039;s Soviet Union during the purges and reporting &quot;all is well&quot; back to the free world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saying that an undeveloped hellhole like Cuba has great food is a bellwether for for that leftist&#8217;s thought.  Sort of like being a well known reporter visiting Stalin&#8217;s Soviet Union during the purges and reporting &#8220;all is well&#8221; back to the free world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gislia Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5252613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gislia Jackson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 12:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5252613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are just a freak, an example of someone who lives and breathes partisanship. What a weirdo you are. I wonder how you even get through the day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are just a freak, an example of someone who lives and breathes partisanship. What a weirdo you are. I wonder how you even get through the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5248899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5248899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I got nothing, EarlyBird!&quot;



Great. Now stop blaming others because you have nothing. Eventually you&#039;ll come around and want to make something of yourself honestly.


Good luck.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I got nothing, EarlyBird!&#8221;</p>
<p>Great. Now stop blaming others because you have nothing. Eventually you&#8217;ll come around and want to make something of yourself honestly.</p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5248870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5248870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In other words, &quot;I got nothing, EarlyBird!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words, &#8220;I got nothing, EarlyBird!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5248861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5248861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How often do you drink alcohol?


Anyone can read the thread. I&#039;ll stand on that. Not once did you correctly state my positions, and your own positions have been drifting to say the least. No matter how many times you repeat yourself, your reading comprehension and ability to summarize remain extremely poor. I&#039;d say somewhere below what we would expect from a well-educated grade school student in the USA.


You should work on getting through the day without destroying your brain with chemicals. Nobody could be as delusional as you without brain chemistry problems. Organic or chemical abuse? I can&#039;t say. You need to figure this out. 


You&#039;ve entered a new low around here. That will affect how you are seen in the future. You&#039;re as unhinged as ever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How often do you drink alcohol?</p>
<p>Anyone can read the thread. I&#8217;ll stand on that. Not once did you correctly state my positions, and your own positions have been drifting to say the least. No matter how many times you repeat yourself, your reading comprehension and ability to summarize remain extremely poor. I&#8217;d say somewhere below what we would expect from a well-educated grade school student in the USA.</p>
<p>You should work on getting through the day without destroying your brain with chemicals. Nobody could be as delusional as you without brain chemistry problems. Organic or chemical abuse? I can&#8217;t say. You need to figure this out. </p>
<p>You&#8217;ve entered a new low around here. That will affect how you are seen in the future. You&#8217;re as unhinged as ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5248724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5248724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re so deranged by partisanship you can&#039;t even understand when we actually agree.  It makes you unable to write coherently, and then you have the nerve to whine that you&#039;re so misunderstood.  Failure to take responsibility for anything seems to be a major theme with you.  
I&#039;ll try to make it easy for you, bone head:
1.) Throughout this thread I have acknowledge that there WERE spies in the US which helped the Soviets in their quest for the bomb - not merely the splitting of the atom, which the USSR was also involved in well before WWII - but the weaponization of that science.
2.) I have ALSO stated that it was inevitable that our enemies would gain such technology, and that we were in a race for that technology.  Even if we got there first, the Soviets would have caught up.  
You first idiotically stated that there would BE NO nuclear weapons AT ALL, post Japan, if ONLY it were not for leftists and spies and commies helping out the USSR.  (Apparently the US generals would have put that super weapon on the shelf out of kindness.) 
Even YOU seemed to be embarrassed by that absurd statement, so then qualified it by later stating...Well, the spies helped close the gap a lot earlier than the Soviets would have just working on their own. 
Well no s**t professor!  Why not state that first?    
You make a hash out of everything by attempting stuff everything into your puny Everyone to My Left is the Source of All Evil super-string theory.  You&#039;re an intellectually lazy slug.  &quot;Objective Facts Matter.&quot;  Hah!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re so deranged by partisanship you can&#8217;t even understand when we actually agree.  It makes you unable to write coherently, and then you have the nerve to whine that you&#8217;re so misunderstood.  Failure to take responsibility for anything seems to be a major theme with you.<br />
I&#8217;ll try to make it easy for you, bone head:<br />
1.) Throughout this thread I have acknowledge that there WERE spies in the US which helped the Soviets in their quest for the bomb &#8211; not merely the splitting of the atom, which the USSR was also involved in well before WWII &#8211; but the weaponization of that science.<br />
2.) I have ALSO stated that it was inevitable that our enemies would gain such technology, and that we were in a race for that technology.  Even if we got there first, the Soviets would have caught up.<br />
You first idiotically stated that there would BE NO nuclear weapons AT ALL, post Japan, if ONLY it were not for leftists and spies and commies helping out the USSR.  (Apparently the US generals would have put that super weapon on the shelf out of kindness.)<br />
Even YOU seemed to be embarrassed by that absurd statement, so then qualified it by later stating&#8230;Well, the spies helped close the gap a lot earlier than the Soviets would have just working on their own.<br />
Well no s**t professor!  Why not state that first?<br />
You make a hash out of everything by attempting stuff everything into your puny Everyone to My Left is the Source of All Evil super-string theory.  You&#8217;re an intellectually lazy slug.  &#8220;Objective Facts Matter.&#8221;  Hah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5248547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5248547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re a horrible bluffer.


You wanted to (contradict my statement and) show that leftists didn&#039;t do significant harm to US interests vis-a-vis spying against US nuclear weapons technologies. You can&#039;t even keep track of your own themes.


You just take opposing positions as you go and then scramble to pull together something that might seem reasonable based on your limited understanding and even more limited memory.


Anyone still reading this can review the thread. You lose. Every time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re a horrible bluffer.</p>
<p>You wanted to (contradict my statement and) show that leftists didn&#8217;t do significant harm to US interests vis-a-vis spying against US nuclear weapons technologies. You can&#8217;t even keep track of your own themes.</p>
<p>You just take opposing positions as you go and then scramble to pull together something that might seem reasonable based on your limited understanding and even more limited memory.</p>
<p>Anyone still reading this can review the thread. You lose. Every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5248538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5248538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is nothing more amusing here than when you try to tap dance out of your idiocy.  It&#039;s hilarious.   You ever see that great movie &quot;Lost In America&quot;?  You&#039;re like the guy trying to get his money back from the casino.  &quot;The Desert Inn has heart!  The Desert Inn has heart!&quot;  
Dude, you&#039;re so in thrall to ideology you can&#039;t even make coherent sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing more amusing here than when you try to tap dance out of your idiocy.  It&#8217;s hilarious.   You ever see that great movie &#8220;Lost In America&#8221;?  You&#8217;re like the guy trying to get his money back from the casino.  &#8220;The Desert Inn has heart!  The Desert Inn has heart!&#8221;<br />
Dude, you&#8217;re so in thrall to ideology you can&#8217;t even make coherent sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5248521</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 23:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5248521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can always count on you to miss the point entirely. It&#039;s like you&#039;re drunk and then try to drink buckets of coffee to compensate. It doesn&#039;t work. Sober up before logging in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can always count on you to miss the point entirely. It&#8217;s like you&#8217;re drunk and then try to drink buckets of coffee to compensate. It doesn&#8217;t work. Sober up before logging in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5248347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5248347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We did not have a monopoly on splitting the atom.  We had a brief monopoly on the bomb, i.e., the weaponizing of the splitting of the atom.  

And yes, THAT technology was stolen.  Nobody is praising Soviet spies here, idiot.  That&#039;s in your deranged world.  I imagine you wearing a crew cut and horned rimmed glasses and spluttering about Communists! and laying awake at night about Sputnik.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We did not have a monopoly on splitting the atom.  We had a brief monopoly on the bomb, i.e., the weaponizing of the splitting of the atom.  </p>
<p>And yes, THAT technology was stolen.  Nobody is praising Soviet spies here, idiot.  That&#8217;s in your deranged world.  I imagine you wearing a crew cut and horned rimmed glasses and spluttering about Communists! and laying awake at night about Sputnik.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5330133</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5330133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You failed again.  

I never denied that spies contributed to the Soviet bomb program.  I indicated 1.) that there was a race for that technology, 2.) accepted the fact that spies helped them, 3.) but believe it was inevitable for them to gain this technology regardless of that help.

Here&#039;s what I wrote:  

&quot;The word was out well before WWII and regardless of traitors or leftists in our midst.&quot;

&quot;Regardless&quot; in that statement indicates that I acknowledge the existence of those spies.  So that I&#039;m very clear with you:  there was a fairly robust Soviet spy ring in the higher reaches of Washington throughout much of the mid-20th Century.  Got it?  

Now, after ALL of this, about which we agree, you state this profundity:

&quot;All I said about our nukes in that context is that we would not need to use them again as others had suggested. Simply having a monopoly on that proven weapon gave us cover to protect growing democracies. No need to bomb the Soviets.&quot;

Well, no kidding, professor.  Yes.  We agree that 1.) there was a Cold War, 2.) nukes were a big part of the balance in that war, 3.) that spies and traitors who helped the Soviets with their nuclear program thereby helped the Soviets fight that Cold War.  Duh.

That&#039;s a lot different than your first idiotic contention that:

&quot;Actually all we had to do was get rid of the damn traitors and spies, and then no nukes would have been required. Certainly none after Japan.&quot;

Don&#039;t call me dumb.  You&#039;re so deranged by hyper-partisanship that you can&#039;t even communicate coherently.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You failed again.  </p>
<p>I never denied that spies contributed to the Soviet bomb program.  I indicated 1.) that there was a race for that technology, 2.) accepted the fact that spies helped them, 3.) but believe it was inevitable for them to gain this technology regardless of that help.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I wrote:  </p>
<p>&#8220;The word was out well before WWII and regardless of traitors or leftists in our midst.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Regardless&#8221; in that statement indicates that I acknowledge the existence of those spies.  So that I&#8217;m very clear with you:  there was a fairly robust Soviet spy ring in the higher reaches of Washington throughout much of the mid-20th Century.  Got it?  </p>
<p>Now, after ALL of this, about which we agree, you state this profundity:</p>
<p>&#8220;All I said about our nukes in that context is that we would not need to use them again as others had suggested. Simply having a monopoly on that proven weapon gave us cover to protect growing democracies. No need to bomb the Soviets.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, no kidding, professor.  Yes.  We agree that 1.) there was a Cold War, 2.) nukes were a big part of the balance in that war, 3.) that spies and traitors who helped the Soviets with their nuclear program thereby helped the Soviets fight that Cold War.  Duh.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a lot different than your first idiotic contention that:</p>
<p>&#8220;Actually all we had to do was get rid of the damn traitors and spies, and then no nukes would have been required. Certainly none after Japan.&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t call me dumb.  You&#8217;re so deranged by hyper-partisanship that you can&#8217;t even communicate coherently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5248114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5248114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Uncle Sam coulda had a monopoly on splitting the atom...&quot;





We did have a monopoly, but our technology was stolen. And it hurt our interests as described when you went nuts again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Uncle Sam coulda had a monopoly on splitting the atom&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>We did have a monopoly, but our technology was stolen. And it hurt our interests as described when you went nuts again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5248112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 23:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5248112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;And this refutes my position in some way?&quot;

Yes. You stated that since the theory was already well known that our monopoly on the technology developed in the Manhattan Project was not significant enough. You trivialized or denied that Soviet spies hurt our interests in very significant ways. That&#039;s before we talk about other military technology that was stolen.

Basically you started out by denying the harm done to our interests by leftists. That&#039;s your song.

&quot;As I stated earlier, the reason the US put such tremendous money and effort into the Manhattan Project was because we knew it was inevitable that other nations would obtain practical nuclear bomb technology as well, and we wanted to get there first. We were in a race.&quot;

It&#039;s not a question of whether or not there was a race. The original question was whether or not leftist traitors hurt our interests when they leaked nuclear technology to the Soviets. You claimed &quot;no.&quot;

&quot;Actually all we had to do was get rid of the damn traitors and spies, and then no nukes would have been required. Certainly none after Japan.&quot;

The biggest spread of communism happened during the period that the Soviets had their &quot;nuclear umbrella.&quot; If we had been able to extend our nuclear monopoly for perhaps even as little as 5 more years, the cold war would have been a lot smaller. A lot happened in that time.

And in reality we could have extended it a lot longer. But as it turned out, the Soviets got the bomb and started immediately protecting Asian communists.

&quot;You are literally blaming the fact of nuclear weapons on leftists! Why? Because the US - in its absolute decency and righteousness - would have retired the nuclear bomb after WWII, if only those damm lefties hadn&#039;t given our secrets to the Soviets!&quot;



As usual, you misunderstand completely. You are so much dumber than I even realized to this point. All I said about our nukes in that context is that we would not need to use them again as others had suggested. Simply having a monopoly on that proven weapon gave us cover to protect growing democracies. No need to bomb the Soviets. 

Then again, you couldn&#039;t even follow the conversation back then so it&#039;s not shocking that you still make stuff up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And this refutes my position in some way?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes. You stated that since the theory was already well known that our monopoly on the technology developed in the Manhattan Project was not significant enough. You trivialized or denied that Soviet spies hurt our interests in very significant ways. That&#8217;s before we talk about other military technology that was stolen.</p>
<p>Basically you started out by denying the harm done to our interests by leftists. That&#8217;s your song.</p>
<p>&#8220;As I stated earlier, the reason the US put such tremendous money and effort into the Manhattan Project was because we knew it was inevitable that other nations would obtain practical nuclear bomb technology as well, and we wanted to get there first. We were in a race.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a question of whether or not there was a race. The original question was whether or not leftist traitors hurt our interests when they leaked nuclear technology to the Soviets. You claimed &#8220;no.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Actually all we had to do was get rid of the damn traitors and spies, and then no nukes would have been required. Certainly none after Japan.&#8221;</p>
<p>The biggest spread of communism happened during the period that the Soviets had their &#8220;nuclear umbrella.&#8221; If we had been able to extend our nuclear monopoly for perhaps even as little as 5 more years, the cold war would have been a lot smaller. A lot happened in that time.</p>
<p>And in reality we could have extended it a lot longer. But as it turned out, the Soviets got the bomb and started immediately protecting Asian communists.</p>
<p>&#8220;You are literally blaming the fact of nuclear weapons on leftists! Why? Because the US &#8211; in its absolute decency and righteousness &#8211; would have retired the nuclear bomb after WWII, if only those damm lefties hadn&#8217;t given our secrets to the Soviets!&#8221;</p>
<p>As usual, you misunderstand completely. You are so much dumber than I even realized to this point. All I said about our nukes in that context is that we would not need to use them again as others had suggested. Simply having a monopoly on that proven weapon gave us cover to protect growing democracies. No need to bomb the Soviets. </p>
<p>Then again, you couldn&#8217;t even follow the conversation back then so it&#8217;s not shocking that you still make stuff up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5247903</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5247903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And?  As I stated before, &quot;the reason we got the bomb first is that we put enough money and effort behind getting it.&quot;  
Note the words &quot;...got the bomb first...&quot;  Whereas you believe it would not have been developed by other nations at all without commies and spies and lefties.  Wrong.  It was a question of time, and the US knew that we were in a race with other nations, which is why the US put such tremendous money and effort into the Manhattan Project:  to get that practical technology first.  

Now, this does not eliminate the fact that there were spies and lefties and commies, and that America Is Number 1.  Okay?  But it does refute your contention that the US is omnipotent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And?  As I stated before, &#8220;the reason we got the bomb first is that we put enough money and effort behind getting it.&#8221;<br />
Note the words &#8220;&#8230;got the bomb first&#8230;&#8221;  Whereas you believe it would not have been developed by other nations at all without commies and spies and lefties.  Wrong.  It was a question of time, and the US knew that we were in a race with other nations, which is why the US put such tremendous money and effort into the Manhattan Project:  to get that practical technology first.  </p>
<p>Now, this does not eliminate the fact that there were spies and lefties and commies, and that America Is Number 1.  Okay?  But it does refute your contention that the US is omnipotent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OfficialPro</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5247030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OfficialPro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 09:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5247030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah and when exotic Eastern spices appeared in trade and were brought to the West, the Dutch, the English, etc, fought WARS over control of them.


And yet with all that, some white people food (including some German offerings) tended to be on the bland side.  Poverty does tend to reduce the ability to buy spices, after all.  So &quot;poor&quot; food, tends to be bland food when spices are too expensive for the masses.



And an interesting parallel is Mainland China.  Though they have some coastal areas which can easily obtain salt, the interior, particularly Szechwan Province, had a real issue with salt being expensive because the salt got taxed progressively upon shipment through each and every Jurisdiction, and they were too far away from the ocean to make their own.  So the poor of Szechwan ended up relying on vinegars and hot peppers to season the food rather than salt.  But that&#039;s a rare instance of something done out of poverty and lack actually working out very well in terms of flavor.


But yeah, leftists have a problem with being honest about stuff like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah and when exotic Eastern spices appeared in trade and were brought to the West, the Dutch, the English, etc, fought WARS over control of them.</p>
<p>And yet with all that, some white people food (including some German offerings) tended to be on the bland side.  Poverty does tend to reduce the ability to buy spices, after all.  So &#8220;poor&#8221; food, tends to be bland food when spices are too expensive for the masses.</p>
<p>And an interesting parallel is Mainland China.  Though they have some coastal areas which can easily obtain salt, the interior, particularly Szechwan Province, had a real issue with salt being expensive because the salt got taxed progressively upon shipment through each and every Jurisdiction, and they were too far away from the ocean to make their own.  So the poor of Szechwan ended up relying on vinegars and hot peppers to season the food rather than salt.  But that&#8217;s a rare instance of something done out of poverty and lack actually working out very well in terms of flavor.</p>
<p>But yeah, leftists have a problem with being honest about stuff like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/humberto-fontova/next-to-anthony-bourdain-paula-deens-a-saint/comment-page-1/#comment-5247024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2013 06:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196549#comment-5247024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~jus/0302/schwartz.pdf

Excerpt:

And, by World War II, Soviet physicists understood that nuclear fission had military significance as it could be used to develop and extraordinarily powerful bomb. Igor Tamm explained this realization to some of his students in 1939 when he discussed fission, saying, “Do you know what this new discovery [fission] means? It means a bomb can be built that will destroy a city out to a radius of maybe 10 kilometers.”11 By June 1940, a specific Uranium Commission had been developed, which set out to locate uranium deposits, develop a method for the production of heavy water, provide for the rapid construction of cyclotrons, study isotope separation, and to measure nuclear constants, all in the interests of harnessing the energy of the nucleus.

Yet, by World War II, the Soviets only had the theoretical understanding necessary to embark on an atomic bomb project. Historian David Holloway points out that “Soviet physicists did not lag behind their American, British, or German counterparts in their thinking about nuclear fission (emphasis added).”13 But the Soviet scientists lacked the Western scientists’ vision of its practical application to a bomb.

Khoplin considered uranium energy to be “a beautiful dream,” but “a distant prospect.” Ioffe considered it a “matter of the next century,”14 and he openly admitted that although Soviet physicists had made significant advances in the theoretical realm of nuclear physics, there still lingered the “failure of Soviet physicists as yet to achieve ‘any kind of practical applications.’”15 (The West had already begun applying the science to medicine.) Even Kurchatov believed that the materials needed to make a bomb exceeded what the world had.16]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~jus/0302/schwartz.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~jus/0302/schwartz.pdf</a></p>
<p>Excerpt:</p>
<p>And, by World War II, Soviet physicists understood that nuclear fission had military significance as it could be used to develop and extraordinarily powerful bomb. Igor Tamm explained this realization to some of his students in 1939 when he discussed fission, saying, “Do you know what this new discovery [fission] means? It means a bomb can be built that will destroy a city out to a radius of maybe 10 kilometers.”11 By June 1940, a specific Uranium Commission had been developed, which set out to locate uranium deposits, develop a method for the production of heavy water, provide for the rapid construction of cyclotrons, study isotope separation, and to measure nuclear constants, all in the interests of harnessing the energy of the nucleus.</p>
<p>Yet, by World War II, the Soviets only had the theoretical understanding necessary to embark on an atomic bomb project. Historian David Holloway points out that “Soviet physicists did not lag behind their American, British, or German counterparts in their thinking about nuclear fission (emphasis added).”13 But the Soviet scientists lacked the Western scientists’ vision of its practical application to a bomb.</p>
<p>Khoplin considered uranium energy to be “a beautiful dream,” but “a distant prospect.” Ioffe considered it a “matter of the next century,”14 and he openly admitted that although Soviet physicists had made significant advances in the theoretical realm of nuclear physics, there still lingered the “failure of Soviet physicists as yet to achieve ‘any kind of practical applications.’”15 (The West had already begun applying the science to medicine.) Even Kurchatov believed that the materials needed to make a bomb exceeded what the world had.16</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 842/907 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 01:46:09 by W3 Total Cache -->