Welcome Tamerlan Tsarnaev — But You’re Outta Here Elian Gonzalez!


tamerlan1-600x350Recently, the intelligence agency of a government our State Department classifies as “innocent” of sponsoring terror (Russia’s) warned the U.S. government to keep an eye on a potential immigrant terrorist. That individual was Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the slain bomber of the Boston Marathon. However, U.S. security agencies found no cause to apprehend, much less deport, the “terrorist suspect” at the time.

Thirteen years ago, a Stalinist regime that our State Department condemns as an official “state-sponsor of terrorism” (Fidel Castro’s) asked the U.S. government to deport a 7-year-old immigrant named Elian Gonzalez. The U.S. Justice department snapped to attention and acted upon Fidel Castro’s request.

Elian Gonzalez’s family — as demonstrated for over a decade — is completely law-abiding.  The Tsarnaev brothers, on the other hand, pulled off what’s being billed as “the most successful terrorist attack since 9/11,” killing three Americans, wounding 178 more and temporarily “shutting down” one of the richest, most dynamic, most sophisticated and financially-vital cities in the Western hemisphere.

On April 22, 2000 the U.S. Dept. of Justice violated the U.S. Constitution at the whim and behest of a Stalinist dictator whose lifelong dream was to nuke Washington, D.C.  Naturally, this delighted many liberals. “Yup, I gotta confess, that now-famous picture of a U.S. marshal in Miami pointing an automatic weapon toward Donato Dalrymple and ordering him in the name of the U.S. government to turn over Elián González warmed my heart,” said Thomas Friedman in the New York Times on April 23, 2000.

But not all liberals rejoiced. Alan Dershowitz and Harvard’s Laurence Tribe, for instance, both condemned the Clinton justice department’s legal swindle.

Thanks to the ritual mainstream media-Castroite collusion, most people forget (or missed) the crucial legal and ethical details of this swindle — which were mostly established during the first week after Elian’s rescue at sea, after his heroic mother’s drowning. The “son-belongs-with-his-father” crowd, for instance, “missed” (with the help of the mainstream media-Democratic complex) that Elian’s father was initially delighted that his motherless son was in the U.S. and in the loving arms of his uncles and cousins.

Mauricio Vicent, a reporter for Madrid newspaper El Pais, wrote that during that first week after Elian’s rescue he’d visited Elian’s home town of Cardenas and talked with Elian’s father, Juan Miguel, along with other family members and friends. All confirmed that Juan Miguel had always longed for his son Elian to flee to the United States. Shortly after Elian’s rescue, his father had even applied for a U.S. visa.

Elian’s Miami uncle, Lazaro, explained it repeatedly and best: “I always said I would turn over Elian to his father, when Juan Miguel would come here and claim him. But I (along with practically everyone with experience under communism from Cambodians to Hungarians and from Lithuanians to Cubans) knew such a thing was impossible. He couldn’t do that. I knew it wasn’t Juan Miguel requesting Elian–it was Fidel.”

The legal-eagles forgot (or missed) that — as David Limbaugh meticulously documents in his book “Absolute Power” — on Dec. 1, 1999 the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) asserted that Miami-based uncle Lazaro was indeed Elian’s legal custodian and Florida’s family court was indeed the place to arbitrate further issues.

But by January 5 the identical INS ruled that state courts had no authority in these matters, that neither Elian, nor Lazaro on his behalf, could apply for political asylum, and that Elian had to return to Cuba by January 14.

Within months, this same INS was kicking down the door to Lazaro Gonzalez’s home, pummeling camera men and elderly ladies to the ground with jackboots and wrenching a screaming Elian from his legal custodians in a blaze of pepper gas and machine guns. When asked for the legal authority for this, they brandished either a search warrant to seize evidence that didn’t exist (and would not have been hidden anyway) or an arrest warrant to seize someone who no one claimed was a criminal or even a lawbreaker.

“They never made it clear just what kind of warrant” it was. And neither would it have been legal,” patiently explained Alan Dershowitz no less.

So what happened?

Well, on Dec. 5 of that year Fidel Castro suddenly whistled, clapped his hands — and his U.S. media and Democratic minions snapped to attention. Then he handed them his talking points and walking orders. Back in Cuba, Fidel Castro’s KGB-trained police also paid a visit to Juan Miguel Gonzales and apparently made him an offer he couldn’t refuse.  The rest is history.

All that stomping and macing and firepower in the dawn hours of April 22, 2000 horrified and enraged many people for sure – it also amazed. Why such overkill? Why such “shock and awe,” many wondered.

Well, it appears that those INS agents genuinely feared that they were on a mission fraught with deadly peril from massive firepower. Fidel Castro himself, you see, had confided to his friend Bill Clinton via his lawyer friend Gregory Craig, that Lazaro Gonzalez’s house was crammed with typical Cuban-American right-wing maniacs, all heavily armed, foaming at the mouth, and ready to rumble. The Gonzalez home could well start spewing the same firepower against American freedom-fighters as did the monastery atop Monte Cassino Italy in 1944.

Given that many American liberals pretty much share Castro’s view of American citizens of Cuban heritage, the Stalinist dictator’s warning was warmly received – and scrupulously acted-upon.

But it turned out that the only blasting that morning came from mace and tear gas into the faces of ladies holding infants and rosaries.

“Excessive force” by U.S. government agents is frightening for sure. But often it’s simply a consequence of too many federal employees with too little to do. All those Terminators and all that Rambo hardware costs money to upkeep. Can’t let it all “rust in the scabbard.” So let’s roll it all out, even to rescue a kitten caught in a tree. After all, many media cameras will be rolling. Many of us notice much the same thing locally from many overstaffed and bored police departments.

But a U.S. Justice Dept. that accepted the word of a state sponsor of terror (Fidel Castro) over that of lawful U.S. citizens — i.e. Cuban-Americans who claimed that from day-one Fidel Castro was the one orchestrating Elian’s return. Such action by a federal agency should really give more U.S. citizens more pause.

Castro’s media just announced the death of the regime’s “James Bond,” Nicolás Sirgado. This KGB- trained agent “penetrated and laughed at the CIA for over ten years,” gloats Castro’s media. “The CIA considered him absolutely trustworthy and vital,” chuckles Cuba’s main media organ. “Sirgado’s value to the U.S. was such that in 1976 U.S. Sec. of State Henry Kissinger presented him with an autographed  Pulsar watch, which today is on display in Havana’s “Hall of Glory” to Cuba’s Intelligence agents.”

With a record like that, it’s small wonder our Dept. of Justice dutifully acted on every letter of Fidel Castro’s advice against Miami Cubans in April 2000.

In the meantime, like Nicolás Sirgado, the Tsarnaev brothers (and who knows how many others) get a clean bill of health from our intelligence agencies.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • davarino

    FAILED IMMIGRATION POLICY………………………

  • AlgerHiss

    Let’s not forget that notorious photo:
    http://img.timeinc.net/time/daily/2010/1004/360_e

    One wonders where that “agent” in the photo is today. He would have fit in quite well with Pol Pot’s crowd.

    • undercover

      The officer in the photo was a Border Patrol Agent and member of the useless BORTAC "Swat" team. After the "daring" raid, the INS, fearing reprisals against the agent, hid him at the giant training center in Glynco, GA. This guy is likely retired now and is a "Retired Annuitant". scamming the taxpayers as an "instructor."

  • STEVE CHAVEZ

    Imagine if HUMBERTO went to Cuba! The U.S. Government would be warning Cuba. Humberto's biggest weapon of mass destruction? His voice. Cuba and Fidel though would allow any supporters like members of the Democrat Party who would then come back from their "fact-finding mission" to speak of the glories of Fidel's ISLAND PRISON. (I always like to compare Cuba with Alcatraz. No difference!)

  • http://shugartpoliticalaction.shugartmedia.com/uncommonsense/ Chris_Shugart

    Double standards every direction you look. Orwell called it "double-think" It's worth looking up.

  • Omar

    Great article. Mr. Fontova exposes the hypocrisy that society has regarding foreign policy. The title is especially good. A similar title for another topic can be used for exposing Illinois Representative Luis Gutierrez's ironic views regarding immigration reform and citizenship rights, The title can be this: "Rep. Gutierrez: 'Welcome all illegal immigrants as American citizens with full equal rights-but you're outta here, American citizens living in Puerto Rico'". Gutierrez's irony regarding citizenship rights is that he proclaims himself as a "champion" of immigrant rights, particularly illegal immigrants. He supports their right to become American citizens and participate in,our democracy. Yet not only does Gutierrez oppose the right of the people of Puerto Rico to become a U.S. state and to fully participate in national elections, but he advocates for the island territory to secede from the United States. Essentially, Gutierrez wants to make nearly four million American citizens from an island territory foreign immigrants. Now, that's ironic. Gutierrez is clearly corrupt just like Eric Holder and others of their ilk.

    • Fritz

      No doubt another party favorite of the Crook County Politburo.

  • g_jochnowitz

    For some reason, custody is a category reserved for prisoners and children. A seven-yer-old is a human being who should not be in custody. Children should have the right to choose whom they live with.

  • Lauren

    Even if Elian had been granted political asylum, that wouldn’t have prevented Juan Miguel from taking his son back to Cuba. Granting someone asylum doesn’t make them obligated to stay. Also, Elian wanted to go home. The Miami relatives had no right to try to keep him from his father. Not sure what that has to do with islamic terrorists.