<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reflections on the Wichita Horror</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 07:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5469960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat Henry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 01:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5469960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Negroes have not evolved past common animals - crimes like this serve to remind us of that fact]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Negroes have not evolved past common animals &#8211; crimes like this serve to remind us of that fact</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5420207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 23:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5420207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, a blast from the past!

I don&#039;t associate Goldwater with racism.  Rather, I associate him with moving the Republican Party to a much more conservative position, which made the Republicans much more palatable to the white Southern conservatives who found themselves in such conflict with the liberal wing of their own party.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, a blast from the past!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t associate Goldwater with racism.  Rather, I associate him with moving the Republican Party to a much more conservative position, which made the Republicans much more palatable to the white Southern conservatives who found themselves in such conflict with the liberal wing of their own party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crazyottojr</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5419943</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crazyottojr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2014 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5419943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hate to jump in here but the justice Department led by an extremely bigoted AG  will never equate Black on White crime with White on Black crime and he has admitted as much. I do think that Conservatism of the South is a little complex than many make it here. Likewise Goldwater was not a Racist but an ardent States rights and civil libertarian. No one could accuse Barry of being a racist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to jump in here but the justice Department led by an extremely bigoted AG  will never equate Black on White crime with White on Black crime and he has admitted as much. I do think that Conservatism of the South is a little complex than many make it here. Likewise Goldwater was not a Racist but an ardent States rights and civil libertarian. No one could accuse Barry of being a racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IndD</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5348451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IndD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 15:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5348451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are so full of it!! There was another quadruple murder - this time with only black victims - the week before and it received almost NO media coverage. Why? Because they weren&#039;t white victims. Four individuals were found shot to death Dec. 7. Raeshawnda Wheaton, 18; Quincy Williams, 17; Odessa Laquita Ford, 17; and Jermaine Levy, 20. Some of the victims were not even &quot;adults&quot; yet there was next to no news coverage of that atrocity. I am white and even I can see the racist disparity; and bigots like yourself only reinforce the problem. You&#039;re sick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are so full of it!! There was another quadruple murder &#8211; this time with only black victims &#8211; the week before and it received almost NO media coverage. Why? Because they weren&#8217;t white victims. Four individuals were found shot to death Dec. 7. Raeshawnda Wheaton, 18; Quincy Williams, 17; Odessa Laquita Ford, 17; and Jermaine Levy, 20. Some of the victims were not even &#8220;adults&#8221; yet there was next to no news coverage of that atrocity. I am white and even I can see the racist disparity; and bigots like yourself only reinforce the problem. You&#8217;re sick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logdon</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5255873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[logdon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5255873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do apologise.


The irony is that during the Fifties, as a boy I lived in Vancouver for three glorious years.


From a Pacific paradise back to a grimy dank Britain still recovering from the War, the episode on reflection, was quite traumatic.


You are right. A God given country, blessed and bountiful.


I wish I was still there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do apologise.</p>
<p>The irony is that during the Fifties, as a boy I lived in Vancouver for three glorious years.</p>
<p>From a Pacific paradise back to a grimy dank Britain still recovering from the War, the episode on reflection, was quite traumatic.</p>
<p>You are right. A God given country, blessed and bountiful.</p>
<p>I wish I was still there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProgDestroyer</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5255841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ProgDestroyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5255841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I completely agree with your description of the source of our problems being our assembly-line style of education.  If we could deal with this issue free of the pressures exerted by unions, politicians at the national level and pushed this down to the local level, I really think our system could be fixed.  The problem is that will never happen short of some kind of shock to the system that I can&#039;t even imagine of at this point.  The German method overall I think is superior, with one major bone of contention for me.  Some folks mature later than others and the German method doesn&#039;t allow for folks like that to change the track they are on.  This is an issue in that system since children are identified early on for the track they are put on.  I was a chucklehead as a youngster and no doubt would have been destined to work a shovel had I been in the German system.  It wasn&#039;t until my senior year that I realized I had &quot;leadership&quot; capability and a knack for a few other talents that would have been wasted in that system.  But it does seem to be a more productive and thorough system overall for the majority.  In any case it does a better job than what we deal with here. 
Congrats on the retirement!  I am hanging in for a few more and may do thirty, but that depends on my attitude and my tolerance level for the BS.  I too have thought about teaching afterward and have thought that if I do I will avoid the public system as well.  A lot of that depends on many factors, but you nailed a couple of reasons I was thinking of too.
Take care and good fortune on your transition and thanks for your service, especially the past twelve years or so.
Cheers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with your description of the source of our problems being our assembly-line style of education.  If we could deal with this issue free of the pressures exerted by unions, politicians at the national level and pushed this down to the local level, I really think our system could be fixed.  The problem is that will never happen short of some kind of shock to the system that I can&#8217;t even imagine of at this point.  The German method overall I think is superior, with one major bone of contention for me.  Some folks mature later than others and the German method doesn&#8217;t allow for folks like that to change the track they are on.  This is an issue in that system since children are identified early on for the track they are put on.  I was a chucklehead as a youngster and no doubt would have been destined to work a shovel had I been in the German system.  It wasn&#8217;t until my senior year that I realized I had &#8220;leadership&#8221; capability and a knack for a few other talents that would have been wasted in that system.  But it does seem to be a more productive and thorough system overall for the majority.  In any case it does a better job than what we deal with here.<br />
Congrats on the retirement!  I am hanging in for a few more and may do thirty, but that depends on my attitude and my tolerance level for the BS.  I too have thought about teaching afterward and have thought that if I do I will avoid the public system as well.  A lot of that depends on many factors, but you nailed a couple of reasons I was thinking of too.<br />
Take care and good fortune on your transition and thanks for your service, especially the past twelve years or so.<br />
Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5255827</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5255827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thoughtful comments - thanks for taking the time to make them.  In response to your two posts, the only thing I&#039;d add, from the perspective of someone who just retired from the military and entered the teaching profession (I chose to work at a parochial school, as the administrative burden and standardized testing issues of the public schools were matters I didn&#039;t really feel like dealing with at my point in life) is that the single biggest problem with our education system is not the unions, corruption, inefficiencies, etc, though those are all fair points, but in the underlying concept.  We adopted an industrial, mass-production model of education, in which large groups of children are moved from teacher to teacher in an assembly-line fashion.  The process was conceived during the height of the industrial age, and is designed to achieve maximum efficiency - i.e., highest output (kids with diplomas) to lowest input.  Any proposed solutions that retain that industrial model as its underpinning will fail.  I don&#039;t care how well a teacher knows his subject, and how engaging his personality is, if he has 25+ kids in a classroom for 50 minutes, he is &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; going to educate the majority of them.  He may reach a few, but there are too many students and too little time.  I think we &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; need to throw massive amounts of money at education - comparable (perhaps in lieu of) our defense budget, but not aimlessly, and not to companies like Pearson.  Rather, we need to re-thing the basics, and re-design schools so that there are many more teachers with much smaller groups.   There are other things to consider - more specialization, more years of education, perhaps a return to German-style differentiation (I have mixed feelings about that), but I think our root problem is that we&#039;re trying to get our education on the cheap (even if we spend a great deal of money on it), and it just isn&#039;t working anymore.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoughtful comments &#8211; thanks for taking the time to make them.  In response to your two posts, the only thing I&#8217;d add, from the perspective of someone who just retired from the military and entered the teaching profession (I chose to work at a parochial school, as the administrative burden and standardized testing issues of the public schools were matters I didn&#8217;t really feel like dealing with at my point in life) is that the single biggest problem with our education system is not the unions, corruption, inefficiencies, etc, though those are all fair points, but in the underlying concept.  We adopted an industrial, mass-production model of education, in which large groups of children are moved from teacher to teacher in an assembly-line fashion.  The process was conceived during the height of the industrial age, and is designed to achieve maximum efficiency &#8211; i.e., highest output (kids with diplomas) to lowest input.  Any proposed solutions that retain that industrial model as its underpinning will fail.  I don&#8217;t care how well a teacher knows his subject, and how engaging his personality is, if he has 25+ kids in a classroom for 50 minutes, he is <i>not</i> going to educate the majority of them.  He may reach a few, but there are too many students and too little time.  I think we <i>do</i> need to throw massive amounts of money at education &#8211; comparable (perhaps in lieu of) our defense budget, but not aimlessly, and not to companies like Pearson.  Rather, we need to re-thing the basics, and re-design schools so that there are many more teachers with much smaller groups.   There are other things to consider &#8211; more specialization, more years of education, perhaps a return to German-style differentiation (I have mixed feelings about that), but I think our root problem is that we&#8217;re trying to get our education on the cheap (even if we spend a great deal of money on it), and it just isn&#8217;t working anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrschristian</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5255710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrschristian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5255710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You forgot to mention Canada in your list as a successful nations we seem to be forgotten as we hover about you in the north LOL we are a great success but only because of God&#039;s continued blessings wich most fail to see, acknowledge or believe that He has had anything to do with our freedom that we enjoy and wich is quikly slipping away. the americans have already given up most  or all of their freedoms, I hope we remain a place where we can critisize our government and not feel threatened, America had walked away from the Bible faith that they built their country on and that was the foundation that the US was built on. they abandoned God, and are reaping the consequences of this. we are guilty of leaving God out as well you see that was the reason our countries were great, not because of our race, our ansestors were pagans as well like in the countries mentioned, they were degenerates just like those who are committing genoside as we sit here. but for the grace of God we would be in the same sesspool of degeneracy like them and we are headed there in the future if people don&#039;t go back to the roots of what made us great to begin with.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot to mention Canada in your list as a successful nations we seem to be forgotten as we hover about you in the north LOL we are a great success but only because of God&#8217;s continued blessings wich most fail to see, acknowledge or believe that He has had anything to do with our freedom that we enjoy and wich is quikly slipping away. the americans have already given up most  or all of their freedoms, I hope we remain a place where we can critisize our government and not feel threatened, America had walked away from the Bible faith that they built their country on and that was the foundation that the US was built on. they abandoned God, and are reaping the consequences of this. we are guilty of leaving God out as well you see that was the reason our countries were great, not because of our race, our ansestors were pagans as well like in the countries mentioned, they were degenerates just like those who are committing genoside as we sit here. but for the grace of God we would be in the same sesspool of degeneracy like them and we are headed there in the future if people don&#8217;t go back to the roots of what made us great to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrschristian</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5330483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrschristian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5330483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I remember this in the news and your right if this had been white on black it never would have been forgotten, I hope those men are executed whats taking so long,? is the justice system in the states so afraid to kill these 2 animals, (no offense to the animals on this planet.) that they can&#039;t get the nerve to do the deed ? put them down!!!! after giving them a chance to repent and get right with God, thats the only mercy I can think to give them, as well as my pity for their families who have to live with what they did. and for them, if they don&#039;t repent they will suffer forever in Hell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember this in the news and your right if this had been white on black it never would have been forgotten, I hope those men are executed whats taking so long,? is the justice system in the states so afraid to kill these 2 animals, (no offense to the animals on this planet.) that they can&#8217;t get the nerve to do the deed ? put them down!!!! after giving them a chance to repent and get right with God, thats the only mercy I can think to give them, as well as my pity for their families who have to live with what they did. and for them, if they don&#8217;t repent they will suffer forever in Hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProgDestroyer</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5255654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ProgDestroyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5255654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Education is an interesting discussion in all cases.  I agree that absence of it has a very detrimental effect over time.  Ignorance is the most expensive problem our country pays for.  There is no question that over time we have seen a steady erosion to the quality of knowledge our kids graduate with at any level.  Our Grandparents in many if not most cases graduated with an 8th grade education, but I would argue they knew more after 8 years than our kids do today after 12.  We spend more per child than any other industrialized country save Switzerland and Sweden, but they are only spending a little more than we are, yet we are damn near last in the industrialized world in every measured category among them.  As the subject pertains to race, it seems to me that blacks are the author of their own demise.  Anytime a black child shows an initiative and talent and chooses to pursue a dream to better themselves to escape the crushing poverty they find themselves in, they are told they are a sellout to their race.  If they speak proper English they are said to be acting white and derided for it.  I find it sad that the majority of black children express a desire to be a professional athlete or rap artist instead of being doctors, scientists, and such.  Look at the smack-down Bill Cosby got a few years ago when he said as much himself.  As long as you have a culture that thinks education is anti-black they will never improve their lot in life, and I would argue that this pernicious message is far more dangerous to their future than the number of words their parents have in their vocabulary, even though it is part of the same problem.  
The next problem we have in education are the teachers unions, AFT and NEA.  These organizations are a cancer on the education system and the dirty little secret is that they couldn&#039;t care less about educating children to a sufficient level as to create productive citizens.  I came to this conclusion in 1998 or so, when I watched the outgoing president of the NEA list his accomplishments and not a single one of the five or so he mentioned had one solitary thing to do with the children he and his minions are charged with educating.  The reason we don&#039;t get much bang for our educational bucks is because we have a system where administrators make more than teachers and generally attract folks into that track based on ideology rather than finding the most successful teachers to run the show.  Nation-wide administrators outnumber teachers 4:1, which is ridiculous as it is the source of some of the dumbest teaching ideas ever devised.  In some districts like NYC the ration is 7:1.  Of course there isn&#039;t any accountability because the administrators either don&#039;t even listen to school boards or ensure their acolytes are the ones sitting on it.  PTAs are a joke and have no teeth or oversight.  In short our schools are setup to ensure their agendas remain unknown and parents are at best humored, but never respected.  To add injury to this, the parents stuck in these situations have no recourse at all.  And anytime you advocate for &quot;school choice&quot; initiatives we hear the same song about how that steals money from the public schools.  In DC they had a choice program that was very successful and what happened to it?  The unions wanted it gone and the Obama dutifully did away with it.  Who was punished?  The very people the dems claim to defend.  Look at the Milwaukee Wi experiment in school choice for a success story on that issue and juxtapose it with the Kansas City MO experience when a federal judge took over that public system.  The details of each are very astounding.  KC ended up spending billions of dollars on ridiculously expensive buildings and such and ended up having a worse drop out rater afterward than they had before the money was spent and the poor drop-out rate was the reason the feds took over the system to begin with.  Here is my &quot;marshall&quot; plan for education:
1)  Eliminate 80% of all administrator positions everywhere.
2)  Take 50% of the savings realized from cutting this payroll and give it to the teachers as merit pay bonus&#039;
3)  Eliminate teachers unions.
4)  If this is too much, then the teachers unions have to negotiate their contracts with a board comprised of equal number of participants from the PTA and School Board with the head of the PTA being the tie-breaker.
5)  Get the feds out of the game altogether by eliminating the Dept of Education.  Education has gotten far worse since their inception and they are nothing but a home for crappy teachers and administrators to dream up the latest stupidity.
6)  Eliminate indoctrination.  BS like &quot;Heather Has Two Mommies&quot;, graphic and radical homosexual education, AGW fantasies, and such have no place in education and take precious time away from real subjects like math, science, English, American History.  
7)  Take the remaining savings from ditching the useless administrators and place that money into team sports, music and art programs.
8)  Eliminate tenure in the Universities.  
9) Eliminate federal funding for college education.  Let the States handle this as they see fit.
10)  Make college regents more accountable to the States by having to answer to their respective State legislatures.
11)  Push for universities to abide by their free speech codes, rather than the commie PC crap they push.  Colleges have become little gulags where if you are ideologically opposed to socialism you are a pariah.  Open debates should be encouraged not a systematic enforcement of provably wrong and evil ideologies.
12)  Institute School Choice into primary education in every school district.  Giving parents this choice will improve the public education system as well, so everybody wins.
I could go on but these ideas would be cost effective and enormously improve our education system.  The novel idea would be that we will re-start education in this country rather than indoctrinating children with failed ideologies of the past.
Cheers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Education is an interesting discussion in all cases.  I agree that absence of it has a very detrimental effect over time.  Ignorance is the most expensive problem our country pays for.  There is no question that over time we have seen a steady erosion to the quality of knowledge our kids graduate with at any level.  Our Grandparents in many if not most cases graduated with an 8th grade education, but I would argue they knew more after 8 years than our kids do today after 12.  We spend more per child than any other industrialized country save Switzerland and Sweden, but they are only spending a little more than we are, yet we are damn near last in the industrialized world in every measured category among them.  As the subject pertains to race, it seems to me that blacks are the author of their own demise.  Anytime a black child shows an initiative and talent and chooses to pursue a dream to better themselves to escape the crushing poverty they find themselves in, they are told they are a sellout to their race.  If they speak proper English they are said to be acting white and derided for it.  I find it sad that the majority of black children express a desire to be a professional athlete or rap artist instead of being doctors, scientists, and such.  Look at the smack-down Bill Cosby got a few years ago when he said as much himself.  As long as you have a culture that thinks education is anti-black they will never improve their lot in life, and I would argue that this pernicious message is far more dangerous to their future than the number of words their parents have in their vocabulary, even though it is part of the same problem.<br />
The next problem we have in education are the teachers unions, AFT and NEA.  These organizations are a cancer on the education system and the dirty little secret is that they couldn&#8217;t care less about educating children to a sufficient level as to create productive citizens.  I came to this conclusion in 1998 or so, when I watched the outgoing president of the NEA list his accomplishments and not a single one of the five or so he mentioned had one solitary thing to do with the children he and his minions are charged with educating.  The reason we don&#8217;t get much bang for our educational bucks is because we have a system where administrators make more than teachers and generally attract folks into that track based on ideology rather than finding the most successful teachers to run the show.  Nation-wide administrators outnumber teachers 4:1, which is ridiculous as it is the source of some of the dumbest teaching ideas ever devised.  In some districts like NYC the ration is 7:1.  Of course there isn&#8217;t any accountability because the administrators either don&#8217;t even listen to school boards or ensure their acolytes are the ones sitting on it.  PTAs are a joke and have no teeth or oversight.  In short our schools are setup to ensure their agendas remain unknown and parents are at best humored, but never respected.  To add injury to this, the parents stuck in these situations have no recourse at all.  And anytime you advocate for &#8220;school choice&#8221; initiatives we hear the same song about how that steals money from the public schools.  In DC they had a choice program that was very successful and what happened to it?  The unions wanted it gone and the Obama dutifully did away with it.  Who was punished?  The very people the dems claim to defend.  Look at the Milwaukee Wi experiment in school choice for a success story on that issue and juxtapose it with the Kansas City MO experience when a federal judge took over that public system.  The details of each are very astounding.  KC ended up spending billions of dollars on ridiculously expensive buildings and such and ended up having a worse drop out rater afterward than they had before the money was spent and the poor drop-out rate was the reason the feds took over the system to begin with.  Here is my &#8220;marshall&#8221; plan for education:<br />
1)  Eliminate 80% of all administrator positions everywhere.<br />
2)  Take 50% of the savings realized from cutting this payroll and give it to the teachers as merit pay bonus&#8217;<br />
3)  Eliminate teachers unions.<br />
4)  If this is too much, then the teachers unions have to negotiate their contracts with a board comprised of equal number of participants from the PTA and School Board with the head of the PTA being the tie-breaker.<br />
5)  Get the feds out of the game altogether by eliminating the Dept of Education.  Education has gotten far worse since their inception and they are nothing but a home for crappy teachers and administrators to dream up the latest stupidity.<br />
6)  Eliminate indoctrination.  BS like &#8220;Heather Has Two Mommies&#8221;, graphic and radical homosexual education, AGW fantasies, and such have no place in education and take precious time away from real subjects like math, science, English, American History.<br />
7)  Take the remaining savings from ditching the useless administrators and place that money into team sports, music and art programs.<br />
8)  Eliminate tenure in the Universities.<br />
9) Eliminate federal funding for college education.  Let the States handle this as they see fit.<br />
10)  Make college regents more accountable to the States by having to answer to their respective State legislatures.<br />
11)  Push for universities to abide by their free speech codes, rather than the commie PC crap they push.  Colleges have become little gulags where if you are ideologically opposed to socialism you are a pariah.  Open debates should be encouraged not a systematic enforcement of provably wrong and evil ideologies.<br />
12)  Institute School Choice into primary education in every school district.  Giving parents this choice will improve the public education system as well, so everybody wins.<br />
I could go on but these ideas would be cost effective and enormously improve our education system.  The novel idea would be that we will re-start education in this country rather than indoctrinating children with failed ideologies of the past.<br />
Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProgDestroyer</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5255613</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ProgDestroyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5255613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry this is so long in coming back to you.  It has been busy the past few days.
I will agree that there was some good to come from the progressive movement of the late 19th to early 20th century.  Your points about workplace safety are legitimate, but keep in mind that much of that issue was a problem that many groups were working on.  In my opinion the progressives have just been very successful at taking all or most of the credit, when it is at best a shared result that came about.  But just because they did some good things for society like initiatives to fix work-place safety problems doesn&#039;t mean that the group on a whole was noble.  I mean some good can be found in all groups, even the most evil.  The Italians said that at least Mussolini made the trains run on time.  Regardless of their past what they have done since has been terribly destructive to our country.  But to stay in the same time period one has to look at what else was being done.  They met in the UK the year after Marx died and started the Fabian society which advocated socialism by evolution vice revolution and sought to merely create a persistent move toward that ideology all the while pretending to be moderates.  For heaven&#039;s sake they adopted the wolf in sheep&#039;s clothing as their logo.  That creation lead to the creation of the Frankfurt school here in the US (with financial support from leading industrialists here), which sought to use issues like work-place safety, women&#039;s issues, and other initiatives that promoted a decay of the US culture (ie:  Christian values).  This is undeniable.  The result is that for the rest of the 20th century we have seen a steady, and at brief times rapid, movement to the far left of the spectrum.  The Fabians and the Frankfurt School used legitimate issues and problems of the day to camouflage their true intent which was at best to move us away from our Constitution and at their worst, to a radical egalitarian system, which is all socialism is anyway.  The irony is that while they made themselves the &quot;champions&quot; of the poor and disadvantaged they were foisting upon those folks a philosophy that would fool the masses into choosing bondage to the State over liberty and freedom.  So the Fabian&#039;s logo was most apt.  They have been so successful that the majority of this country, or at least a very large plurality, now believe that all forms of government assistance and largesse are their constitutional right or at least believe that it is owed to them for perceived or real injustices from the distant past.  In short all smart communists and radical socialists call themselves progressive, even today.  I mean how can one argue with &quot;progress&quot;?  It is a more benign version of ridicule to silence critics, much like the more pejorative term &quot;racist&quot; is used today.   
At this point I will move to the issue of whether America is racist.  It is true we are, but not the way I think you are saying.  One item that has been added to the definition of racism is the ability to control institutions to enforce it (ala, Jesse Jackson et. al.)  As such, we have been told that blacks can&#039;t be racist because they don&#039;t control the institutions.  Of course at this point complete control handed to them wouldn&#039;t be good enough either because then we would be lectured that there is still latent racist thoughts that certain terms function as &quot;dog whistles&quot; to activate said latent racist thoughts.  In other words the goal posts are always moved when success is about to be achieved.  It is why even before Obama was inaugurated the race baiters were out there saying his election didn&#039;t prove the USA wasn&#039;t racist at all.  I and others predicted things would get worse, a lot worse because now the race hustlers were in charge.  In the end that is all a &quot;community organize&quot; is.  A prog plant whose purpose is to &quot;rub raw the wounds of discontent&quot;, to affect social change.  A change to a more &quot;just&quot; society.  Of course bigotry, racisms ugly cousin, will never be eradicated as long as individual differences are present.  The key is whether a society allows them to be a part of any decision making, and by that measure we have achieved a very impressive amount of success at least with regards to white on black racism/bigotry.  Unfortunately it has been replaced with the reverse.  Here is an interesting question; blacks are only about 12% of the population.  If they control the bureaucracy and institute policies designed to get pay back doesn&#039;t that come awfully close to apartheid, particularly when apartheid is defined as minority rule over a majority based upon racial justifications?  Something to discuss at least.  I will address your interesting ideas on education in another post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry this is so long in coming back to you.  It has been busy the past few days.<br />
I will agree that there was some good to come from the progressive movement of the late 19th to early 20th century.  Your points about workplace safety are legitimate, but keep in mind that much of that issue was a problem that many groups were working on.  In my opinion the progressives have just been very successful at taking all or most of the credit, when it is at best a shared result that came about.  But just because they did some good things for society like initiatives to fix work-place safety problems doesn&#8217;t mean that the group on a whole was noble.  I mean some good can be found in all groups, even the most evil.  The Italians said that at least Mussolini made the trains run on time.  Regardless of their past what they have done since has been terribly destructive to our country.  But to stay in the same time period one has to look at what else was being done.  They met in the UK the year after Marx died and started the Fabian society which advocated socialism by evolution vice revolution and sought to merely create a persistent move toward that ideology all the while pretending to be moderates.  For heaven&#8217;s sake they adopted the wolf in sheep&#8217;s clothing as their logo.  That creation lead to the creation of the Frankfurt school here in the US (with financial support from leading industrialists here), which sought to use issues like work-place safety, women&#8217;s issues, and other initiatives that promoted a decay of the US culture (ie:  Christian values).  This is undeniable.  The result is that for the rest of the 20th century we have seen a steady, and at brief times rapid, movement to the far left of the spectrum.  The Fabians and the Frankfurt School used legitimate issues and problems of the day to camouflage their true intent which was at best to move us away from our Constitution and at their worst, to a radical egalitarian system, which is all socialism is anyway.  The irony is that while they made themselves the &#8220;champions&#8221; of the poor and disadvantaged they were foisting upon those folks a philosophy that would fool the masses into choosing bondage to the State over liberty and freedom.  So the Fabian&#8217;s logo was most apt.  They have been so successful that the majority of this country, or at least a very large plurality, now believe that all forms of government assistance and largesse are their constitutional right or at least believe that it is owed to them for perceived or real injustices from the distant past.  In short all smart communists and radical socialists call themselves progressive, even today.  I mean how can one argue with &#8220;progress&#8221;?  It is a more benign version of ridicule to silence critics, much like the more pejorative term &#8220;racist&#8221; is used today.<br />
At this point I will move to the issue of whether America is racist.  It is true we are, but not the way I think you are saying.  One item that has been added to the definition of racism is the ability to control institutions to enforce it (ala, Jesse Jackson et. al.)  As such, we have been told that blacks can&#8217;t be racist because they don&#8217;t control the institutions.  Of course at this point complete control handed to them wouldn&#8217;t be good enough either because then we would be lectured that there is still latent racist thoughts that certain terms function as &#8220;dog whistles&#8221; to activate said latent racist thoughts.  In other words the goal posts are always moved when success is about to be achieved.  It is why even before Obama was inaugurated the race baiters were out there saying his election didn&#8217;t prove the USA wasn&#8217;t racist at all.  I and others predicted things would get worse, a lot worse because now the race hustlers were in charge.  In the end that is all a &#8220;community organize&#8221; is.  A prog plant whose purpose is to &#8220;rub raw the wounds of discontent&#8221;, to affect social change.  A change to a more &#8220;just&#8221; society.  Of course bigotry, racisms ugly cousin, will never be eradicated as long as individual differences are present.  The key is whether a society allows them to be a part of any decision making, and by that measure we have achieved a very impressive amount of success at least with regards to white on black racism/bigotry.  Unfortunately it has been replaced with the reverse.  Here is an interesting question; blacks are only about 12% of the population.  If they control the bureaucracy and institute policies designed to get pay back doesn&#8217;t that come awfully close to apartheid, particularly when apartheid is defined as minority rule over a majority based upon racial justifications?  Something to discuss at least.  I will address your interesting ideas on education in another post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5254563</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5254563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;They nationalized industries...&quot;
 
Really?  I was under the impression that Krupp and Porsche went to Allied prisons after the war as owners of their firms.  Thyssen&#039;s industries were temporarily nationalized, but only after Thyssen fled to Switzerland and sent a letter to the Nazis announcing his opposition to the war.  (Ironically, though, Thyssen was one of the people who encouraged Hitler to suppress the Socialists in the Night of the Long Knives; what he hadn&#039;t banked on was that Hitler would also take the opportunity to settle scores with Schleicher, making Thyssen very nervous indeed).
 
And, again, controlling the media, manipulating food distribution, and &quot;persecuting dissenters&quot; are not distinguishing characteristics of socialism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They nationalized industries&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Really?  I was under the impression that Krupp and Porsche went to Allied prisons after the war as owners of their firms.  Thyssen&#8217;s industries were temporarily nationalized, but only after Thyssen fled to Switzerland and sent a letter to the Nazis announcing his opposition to the war.  (Ironically, though, Thyssen was one of the people who encouraged Hitler to suppress the Socialists in the Night of the Long Knives; what he hadn&#8217;t banked on was that Hitler would also take the opportunity to settle scores with Schleicher, making Thyssen very nervous indeed).</p>
<p>And, again, controlling the media, manipulating food distribution, and &#8220;persecuting dissenters&#8221; are not distinguishing characteristics of socialism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5254558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5254558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My first, rather lengthy response, didn&#039;t make it past the moderators - apparently Kevin Phillips&#039; quotes were too racist to get through.  I&#039;ll offer an abbreviated comment here:
1.  Re the legislation: the CRA of 1965 was conceived by Kennedy, introduced by Emanual Celler (D-NY), final version lead sponsor (of 40-some) was Democrat Hubert Humphrey.  For both the CRA and the VRA, both minority and majority leaders (D &amp; R) were on board and pushed the legislation.  Bottom line: both were conceived by Democratic presidents, both received bipartisan support in being sponsored, both were opposed by Southern white conservative Democrats.
 
2.  I recommend reading this article, start to finish.  It&#039;s an extensive piece on Kevin Phillips, the primary architect of the Southern Strategy, written in 1970.  http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/books/phillips-southern.pdf
 
It&#039;s not simply an observation, but an active strategy.  Note particularly this passage in the 3d column of the 3d page, quoting Phillips: 
 
&lt;blockquote&gt;
All the talk about Repulicans making inroads into the Negro vote is persiflage...From now on, the Republicans are never going to get more than 10 to 20 per cent of the Negro vote and they don&#039;t need any more than than . . . but Republicans would be shortsighted if they weakened enforcement of the Voting Rights Act.  The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans.  That&#039;s where the votes are.  Without that prodding from the blacks, the whites will backslide into their old comfortable arrangement with the local Democrats.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first, rather lengthy response, didn&#8217;t make it past the moderators &#8211; apparently Kevin Phillips&#8217; quotes were too racist to get through.  I&#8217;ll offer an abbreviated comment here:<br />
1.  Re the legislation: the CRA of 1965 was conceived by Kennedy, introduced by Emanual Celler (D-NY), final version lead sponsor (of 40-some) was Democrat Hubert Humphrey.  For both the CRA and the VRA, both minority and majority leaders (D &amp; R) were on board and pushed the legislation.  Bottom line: both were conceived by Democratic presidents, both received bipartisan support in being sponsored, both were opposed by Southern white conservative Democrats.</p>
<p>2.  I recommend reading this article, start to finish.  It&#8217;s an extensive piece on Kevin Phillips, the primary architect of the Southern Strategy, written in 1970.  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/books/phillips-southern.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/books/phillips-southern.pdf</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not simply an observation, but an active strategy.  Note particularly this passage in the 3d column of the 3d page, quoting Phillips: </p>
<blockquote><p>
All the talk about Repulicans making inroads into the Negro vote is persiflage&#8230;From now on, the Republicans are never going to get more than 10 to 20 per cent of the Negro vote and they don&#8217;t need any more than than . . . but Republicans would be shortsighted if they weakened enforcement of the Voting Rights Act.  The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans.  That&#8217;s where the votes are.  Without that prodding from the blacks, the whites will backslide into their old comfortable arrangement with the local Democrats.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5254555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5254555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apology accepted!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apology accepted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5254554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5254554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still nothing?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still nothing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5254542</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 13:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5254542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Negroes are dangerous animals and need to be treated as such if they are discovered.&quot;
 
And somebody on this thread assured me that racism died in 1965, and that all racism today is of blacks against whites.
 
Well, you&#039;re a disgrace to your uniform, but by being so open about what others have learned to conceal, you serve a useful function, at least.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Negroes are dangerous animals and need to be treated as such if they are discovered.&#8221;</p>
<p>And somebody on this thread assured me that racism died in 1965, and that all racism today is of blacks against whites.</p>
<p>Well, you&#8217;re a disgrace to your uniform, but by being so open about what others have learned to conceal, you serve a useful function, at least.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Hines</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5254513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat Hines]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 12:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5254513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s simply not true, it is a lie.  Negro thugs are almost always protected as to their race.


Negroes commit violent crime between 900% and 1200% more often than whites, this should be on the front page of every newspaper in the land.

Yet, it is not.


In fact, there&#039;s an unspoken rule that negroes &quot;shall not be identified as such&quot; regardless of what they&#039;ve done.  

Negroes are dangerous animals and need to be treated as such if they are discovered.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s simply not true, it is a lie.  Negro thugs are almost always protected as to their race.</p>
<p>Negroes commit violent crime between 900% and 1200% more often than whites, this should be on the front page of every newspaper in the land.</p>
<p>Yet, it is not.</p>
<p>In fact, there&#8217;s an unspoken rule that negroes &#8220;shall not be identified as such&#8221; regardless of what they&#8217;ve done.  </p>
<p>Negroes are dangerous animals and need to be treated as such if they are discovered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5254404</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 05:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5254404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I personally attacked you rather than your idiotic argument. That was ad hominem, you utter dolt.&quot;
 
You are still mistaking &quot;ad hominem&quot; for &quot;insult.&quot;  They&#039;re not synonyms.

I don&#039;t know how to make it any plainer, but let&#039;s give it one more shot.
 
An insult - a personal attack - may or may not be an ad hominem, depending on how it is used.  To put it as simply as possible, what makes something an ad hominem is &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; that it attacks the person rather than the argument, but that the personal attack stands in lieu of one&#039;s own argument.  
 
A:  &quot;Racism is a problem in America today.&quot;
B:  &quot;You slurp on dongs!&quot;

Not an ad hominem.  There&#039;s an insult, and there&#039;s no substantive response to A&#039;s assertion, but there&#039;s no ad hominem.  Now let&#039;s look at how it would become an ad hominem.

A:  &quot;Racism is a problem in America today.&quot;
B:  &quot;You&#039;re racist yourself, so you&#039;re in no position to claim that racism is a problem.&quot;

That&#039;s an ad hominem - the insult is used to discredit the individual making the assertion, and thereby the assertion itself.
 
That&#039;s a bit oversimplified, but you need to walk before you run.
 
&quot;Because you like to slurp on dongs.&quot;
  
Is that your final answer?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I personally attacked you rather than your idiotic argument. That was ad hominem, you utter dolt.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are still mistaking &#8220;ad hominem&#8221; for &#8220;insult.&#8221;  They&#8217;re not synonyms.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how to make it any plainer, but let&#8217;s give it one more shot.</p>
<p>An insult &#8211; a personal attack &#8211; may or may not be an ad hominem, depending on how it is used.  To put it as simply as possible, what makes something an ad hominem is <i>not</i> that it attacks the person rather than the argument, but that the personal attack stands in lieu of one&#8217;s own argument.  </p>
<p>A:  &#8220;Racism is a problem in America today.&#8221;<br />
B:  &#8220;You slurp on dongs!&#8221;</p>
<p>Not an ad hominem.  There&#8217;s an insult, and there&#8217;s no substantive response to A&#8217;s assertion, but there&#8217;s no ad hominem.  Now let&#8217;s look at how it would become an ad hominem.</p>
<p>A:  &#8220;Racism is a problem in America today.&#8221;<br />
B:  &#8220;You&#8217;re racist yourself, so you&#8217;re in no position to claim that racism is a problem.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s an ad hominem &#8211; the insult is used to discredit the individual making the assertion, and thereby the assertion itself.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a bit oversimplified, but you need to walk before you run.</p>
<p>&#8220;Because you like to slurp on dongs.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that your final answer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5254402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 05:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5254402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Maybe you should watch &#039;The Girl Show.&#039;&quot;
 
I rather thought I was.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Maybe you should watch &#8216;The Girl Show.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>I rather thought I was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/jack-kerwick/reflctions-on-the-wichita-massacre/comment-page-1/#comment-5254401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2013 04:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=199142#comment-5254401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I&#039;m referencing &quot;The Man Show,&quot; you fem,...&quot;

Yes, hence the reference to getting your German second hand from Jimmy Kimmel in my last post.  You&#039;re always running a little behind, aren&#039;t you?

&quot;I seriously doubt you speak &quot;fluent&quot; German.&quot;

So doubt it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m referencing &#8220;The Man Show,&#8221; you fem,&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, hence the reference to getting your German second hand from Jimmy Kimmel in my last post.  You&#8217;re always running a little behind, aren&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>&#8220;I seriously doubt you speak &#8220;fluent&#8221; German.&#8221;</p>
<p>So doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 821/994 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 02:33:55 by W3 Total Cache -->