The D.C. Navy Yard Shooting and Racial Double Standards


4B9064268-g-let-130919-alexis-730a.blocks_desktop_teaseImagine that a white man went on a shooting rampage at a location in which there gathered many people of various racial backgrounds.  He shoots and kills, say, a dozen people.  Most of his victims are black.

Though there is relatively little known about the shooter’s background, this much is known: by all accounts, he was an “angry, frustrated, vengeful” man who not infrequently complained that he was mistreated because of the color of his skin.  He was also known to have in turn mistreated blacks who he believed had wronged him.

Had this imaginary scenario played out in reality, is there anyone reading this who could seriously doubt for a moment that all that we’d be hearing about is “white racism”? Can anyone doubt that we’d be hearing about this incessantly well into the future?

Now, picture another hypothetical set of circumstances: A (white) Christian man opens fire on several people, hitting and killing about 12 of them.  Most of his victims are Muslims. While all of the details concerning his identity and “motivation” aren’t yet available, those who knew him describe him as “angry, frustrated,” and “vengeful.” We also know that he frequently expressed bitterness toward Islam, and blamed the Islamic world for his ills.

Do you think that the press would busy themselves digging more deeply for other facts concerning such a shooter if they knew this much? Does anyone seriously doubt that the media would bombard us with wall-to-wall coverage of this “angry, frustrated, vengeful” Christian killer?

Or suppose that a heterosexual opened fire in a crowed place, a place filled with both homosexuals and heterosexuals. Most of his victims are homosexuals. The killer turns out to have been an “angry, frustrated,” and “vengeful” man who often revealed to others his animus toward gays.

Do you think that the media would be spending much time talking about “mental health,” the “failure” of the system, or guns if this kind of shooting occurred?  Isn’t it a foregone conclusion that all that we’d be hearing about from the talking heads are the evils of “homophobia”?

In the real world, as everyone knows, 12 people were indeed shot and murdered earlier this week by a gunman at the Washington, D.C. Naval Yard. His name was Aaron Alexis. And he was black.

Seventy-five percent of those who he slaughtered are white.

Alexis, we know, has been characterized by those who knew him as “angry, frustrated,” and “vengeful.”  It’s also been reported that he often “complained” that “that he was the victim of racial discrimination.” He “felt a lot of discrimination and racism with white people especially.”

Alexis displayed “a growing sense of entitlement and disrespect,”  a “tendency to feel like people owed him something all the time.”

In the final analysis, he appeared “like he was fed up with the United States.”

It is now something on the order of a truism that black criminals, particularly when their targets are white, are simply held to a grossly lower standard than that of their white counterparts. Still, given the national notoriety that Alexis, rightly, achieved within the span of hours, and given both his history of racial animus toward whites as well as the particularly brutal nature of the violence that he visited upon his mostly white victims, one would think—one would hope—that perhaps just this once, the media would suspend its self-imposed ban on judging black purveyors of evil according to the same standard by which it binds their white counterparts.

But no.

That even politicians and pundits are unsettled by the race, and racial preoccupations, of Aaron Alexis is clear from the fact that already, just a few short days following the massacre for which he’s responsible, they are talking remarkably little about it.  Contrast this situation with that of the extensive coverage that the mass shootings—and white shooters—in Connecticut, Colorado, and Arizona persisted in eliciting for weeks.

The fear and hypocrisy on the part of the punditry and political classes when it comes to race relations truly knows no bounds.  Such is their resistance to reality that it’s no stretch to think that had the 9/11 hijackers been, not men of Middle Eastern descent but, say, black American Muslims shouting “Black is beautiful” or, along with Barack Obama’s old pastor, “God damn America,” that even then, a sustained campaign would be underway to ensure that the racial component of that day of infamy was marginalized or denied entirely.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • Realist

    “Alexis displayed “a growing sense of entitlement and disrespect,” a “tendency to feel like people owed him something all the time.””

    This is the American Left’s “gift” to minorities, and especially blacks: Inject and cultivate thoughts of entitlement and disrespect towards whites and towards the nation.

    • Alvaro

      Correct. They’ll pretend to sympathize with them, but will throw them under the bus to score political points. They want to keep minorities poor, unsuccessful and angry – it is how they get votes from them.

      • alex

        what Julia implied I am stunned that a mom can earn $4343 in one month on the internet. this post

        w­w­w.Y­a­d­7.c­o­m

    • BS77

      I just read that 23 people were shot in Chicago in ONE day….3 died and some are in critical condition. Isn’t ours a lovely society???. How many people are killed each year in this manner? Clue: It’s in the tens of thousands, but the lame stream idiot media will not deal with this.

      • Nabuquduriuzhur

        It’s like Oregon thinking about re-legalizing pot today. People just don’t learn.

        It was legal from 1974-1997 and toward the end, Portland was having 1000+ homicides per year from drug violence.

        We have 11,000+ homicides per year. 8,000+ of them are by black Americans. (USBJS)

  • truebearing

    The Left wouldn’t even consider the mental illness component of any of the previous mass shootings… by deranged white guys. They were too busy trying to leverage guilt, or convert death into gun control, or make absurd claims that the shooters were Tea Partiers — anything to smear the Right. Now that a black man goes berserk with a sawed-off shotgun, they need some cover, so while they’re still trying desperately to convert death into power, at least some are acknowledging mental illness as the cause, if only as a fig leaf to hide any racist motives on the part of a black mass murderer.

    • BS77

      Read this week’s column by Ann Coulter.

  • fredbailey

    Excellent!! Bravo! Thank you!

  • Godagesil Rex

    I am no apologist, but I am a scientist, and I would like to know the racial make up of the service people at risk at the time of the shootiing. In other words, it might be that the racial make up of the people in the building was 75% white, and 25% black. Blacks make up about 20-25% of the military if I am not mistaken. So it follows that if Alexis had walked through the building randomly shooting people, he would have killed or injured people at the relative percentages he did. We should not go trying to find bogeymen where there are none. When we do, it only undermines, deminishes and marginalizes the valid arguments and warnings that appear on this website. I frequently post links to articles here on my facebook page. This will not be one of them. The argument is pretty thin and grabs at straws. Remember the what happened to the boy who cried, “wolf!” too often.

    • Bill Thurnau

      this article was in no way trying to find a “bogeyman”. I agree with your percentage thoughts, and you are right. All this article was trying to say was, what would have happened if it was turned around. Would the media lay low? Would they just say,” well he was a mentally disturbed individual.”? I think not. They would be hanging this killer out to dry if he were a white/right/hetero/Christian.

      • Watcher

        The black perp gets the benefit of the doubt as usual in the media. The lack of media dissection speaks volumes.

    • DilloTank

      I agree with your statistical analysis of the victims. However, one cannot ignore the fact the many blacks hate whites. It a big part of American black culture.

      • Aizino Smith

        I have seen it in the military. I have heard stories of other military members. I have seen it at black fraternities.

        • ziggy zoggy

          Yeah. My friend in the Air Force told me there was a name for Blacks in the Force. “Orbs.” Because whenever a large group of airmen got together, the Blacks would orbit around each other and shun Whites. This was back in 1990.

          Black Americans tend to be resentful, anti-White racists. Fact.

          • DB1954

            It seems like that’s gotten markedly worse since Obama in 08.

    • DilloTank

      I do not hate blacks. I try not to hate anyone, even the truly evil. However, American blacks as a group have many distasteful characteristics. My experience is that American blacks, not all but most, are dishonest, they do not keep their word. They lack moral scruples. They feel that they are justified in defrauding businesses and white people. They are prejudiced and hateful. And, according to the statistics, they murder at a rate 5 to 10 times that of whites. They have adopted a culture of criminality and commit far more crimes per capita, then whites. And our corrupt schools lie to them and tell them that the reason so many of them are in jail, is because America is a racist county.

      They deny that white people died in the Civil War to free them.

      Again, I am not talking about all blacks, but a disturbing portion, I believe, many of the things that I have mentioned are true about a large majority of black people.

      I am judging them by the content of their character, not the color of their skin.

      I say this from rather extensive personal experience.

      • Aizino Smith

        key phrase “disturbing portion”

        The left and unscrupulous black leaders feed it.

        • kasandra

          That’s what you get when the political left, for over forty years, presses on a “discrete and insular minority” a narrative of unlimited grievance and entitlement.

      • DeShawn

        “My experience is that American jews, not all but most, are dishonest,
        they do not keep their word. They lack moral scruples. They feel that
        they are justified in defrauding businesses and white and black people. They are
        prejudiced and hateful.”

        There I fixed it for you. :)

        • ziggy zoggy

          If you hate Jews so much why are you so attracted to them? It must kill you inside to lust after Jewish shmucks.

          • DB1954

            :-D

        • iluvisrael

          it’s shawny – the black white supremacist – they need useful idiots like you to shine shoes and do the laundry

          • UCSPanther

            This idiot can only come up with bizarro conspiracy theories, and when challenged, either goes on a rant about Jews, or brags about some physics degree that more than likely doesn’t exist.

        • UCSPanther

          I’ll bet that whenever you see a synagogue when walking back from the liquor store or “Physics Lab”, you pull out a piece of dog-eared note-paper with a series of bizarre scribblings on it which only make sense to a demented mind and think “It’s just as the stone tablets predicted!”

          And then you write some hate-filled nonsense that confirms that you are, in fact, a nutcase.

          And you are nowhere near as good a demented writer that Francis E Dec was…

        • DilloTank

          You are lying. You have not spent any significant time around Jews.

          • DilloTank

            The election of a black President has meant nothing for race relations in the U.S..

            http://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2013/07/16/the-election-of-a-black-president-has-meant-nothing-n1641435/page/full

          • DB1954

            I don’t agree. I think Obama’s election has caused race relations to go off the rails. It’s because initially some whites could see his racism. Five years later, I think a majority of whites see his racism, and I think the percentage will grow even more in the next 9 months. I’m beginning to also sense that some blacks I know, are starting to feel remorse for what this racist bast*rd has started in this country.

        • DilloTank

          Why is it always blacks that behave like savages. It is because your culture is impoverished. It has nothing to do with racism, except your own hatred towards not blacks.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_Heights_riot

          For three days following the accident, numerous African Americans and Caribbean Americans of the neighborhood, joined by growing numbers of non-residents, rioted in Crown Heights. In the rioting of the ensuing three days, according to Edward Shapiro, many of the rioters “did not even live in Crown Heights.”[5]

          During the riots, Jews were injured, stores were looted, and cars and homes were damaged. The rioters identified Jewish homes by the mezuzot affixed to the front doors.[14] Rioters marched through Crown Heights carrying anti-Semitic signs and an Israeli flag was burned. Rioters threw bricks and bottles at police; shots were fired at police and police cars were pelted and overturned, including the Police Commissioner’s car.[5][14]

          An additional 350 police officers were added to the regular duty roster on August 20 and were assigned to Crown Heights in an attempt to quell the rioting. After episodes of rock- and bottle-throwing involving hundreds of blacks and Jews, and after groups of blacks marched through Crown Heights chanting “No Justice, No Peace!”, “Death to the Jews!”, and “Whose streets? Our streets!”, an additional 1,200 police officers were sent to confront rioters in Crown Heights.[5] Riots escalated to the extent that a detachment of 200 police officers was overwhelmed and had to retreat for their safety. On August 22, over 1,800 police officers, including mounted and motorcycle units, had been dispatched to stop the attacks on people and property.[5]

          By the time the three days of rioting ended, 152 police officers and 38 civilians were injured, 27 vehicles were destroyed, seven stores were looted or burned,[21] and 225 cases of robbery and burglary were committed.[5] At least 129 arrests were made during the riots,[21]including 122 blacks and seven whites.[22][23] Property damage was estimated at one million dollars.[5]

    • JamesJ

      As a scientist you should know that 5% of the population (black males 15 – 35 yrs of age) commits 51% of all violent crime.

      • goomba

        A black is 15 times more likely to be a criminal than a white, and we for sure got some white criminals.

      • ziggy zoggy

        Not 51%. 93 %.

    • Aizino Smith

      http://prhome.defense.gov/RFM/MPP/ACCESSION%20POLICY/
      PopRep2008/summary/chap5.pdf

      You estimates are a tad high but ballpark

      See page 26.

      • goomba

        No they are not. Black crime is vastly under reported for PC reasons; since a black man can “do no wrong” i.e. its somebody else’s fault, or the fault of “society”.

        • Aizino Smith

          I was replying to Gardasil King’s that 20 to 25 % of the military is black. He is essentially correct. The Marines were slightly below 12% and the Air Force is below 18%. That is all i said

          I did not say that crimes by this or that ethnic group were underreported. Nor do I deny it.

          The link does not work correctly. So here is the parsed link.

          http://prhome.defense.gov/

          RFM/MPP/ACCESSION%20POLICY
          /PopRep2008/summary/chap5.pdf

          See page 26 of report

          • ziggy zoggy

            Male Marines have to be willing to risk their lives in combat. Airmen (but not airwomen) have to be smarter. The Navy has co-ed ships and low induction requirements. Last time I checked, the Army only required a score of 30% on the ASVAB, or whatever it’s supposed to be called nowadays. I know for a fact that the test is easier than ever. And the majority of Blacks serve in non combat positions in the Army and Navy. No offense to good soldiers, airmen, Seamen (chuckle,) or Marines, but those are the facts.

            I’m surprised there aren’t more Alexises. Whenever I hear about mass shootings, grenade attacks on fellows, rapes, mindless murders, etc, it seems Blacks, islamopithecines or Black islamopithecines are always the ones responsible.

    • ytdontplay

      Godagesil Rex: A scientist, what a crock. I guess your real name is Yacoub.

      • goomba

        Yt, your a denier of the truth. You are living in shame.

    • ziggy zoggy

      The article is about the media coverup of a Black mass shooter and his DOCUMENTED anti-White racism. It is NOT about the racism of the shooter – Alexis.

      You are a stupid fucking racist POS. who cares what a nobody like you posts on your Facebook page?

  • JVictor

    Isn’t it sad that we are having this discussion in 2013? 50 years ago, Martin Luther King, Jr. implored the nation and the world to judge “his children,” and, by extension, the children of his children’s generation, by the content of their character and not the color of their skin. Thanks to the radical, divide and conquer mentality of Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals that has emblazoned itself in the mind and heart of Obama and his administration, along with the likes of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, we are still captivated by the color of someone’s skin before we even have a chance to get to know the content of their character.

    MLK’s dream has been on life support since the aforementioned race pimps started lining their silk pockets with the money generated by their divisive agenda. Since January 2009, Obama et. al. have been doing everything they can to pull the plug.

    • Watcher

      Looking back beyond the rhetoric of MLK and what actually happened on the streets, it’s evident he stirred up the blacks too. MLK was a kinder, gentler rabble rouser. He would come in with his soaring words and as he was leaving town, chaos and riots would erupt in his wake. However, his hands always remained clean. Kind of like Obama’s M.O.

      • cjkcjk

        Right, MLK would be just like the others today if he had lived. Anyone who doubts that please look up and read his interview with Playboy magazine before you decide I’m a liar.

        • ziggy zoggy

          I read that interview and I disagree with you. I’ve read 30 years worth of Playboy interviews.

          • cjkcjk

            I guess maybe we just think differently, but to me this stuff stinks just like all the rest:
            Playboy:
            Along with the other civil rights leaders, you have often proposed a massive program of economic aid, financed by the Federal Government, to improve the lot of the nation’s 20,000,000 million Negroes. Just one of the projects you’ve mentioned… is expected to cost $141,000,000 over the next ten years, and that includes only Harlem. A nationwide program such as you propose would undoubtedly run into the billions.
            King:
            About 50 billion, actually – which is less than one year of our present defense spending. It is my belief that with the expenditure of this amount over a ten-year period, a genuine and dramatic transformation could be achieved in the conditions of Negro life in America. I am positive, moreover, that the money spend would be more than amply justified by the benefits that would accrue to the nation through a spectacular decline in school dropouts, family breakups, crime rates, illegitimacy, swollen relief rolls, rioting and other social evils.
            Playboy:
            Do you think it’s realistic to hope that the Government would consider an appropriation of such magnitude other than for national defense?
            King:
            I certainly do. This country has the resources to solve any problems once that problem is accepted as national policy. An example is aid to Appalachia, which has been made a policy of the Federal Government’s much-touted war on poverty; one billion was proposed for its relief – without making the slightest dent in the defense budget. Another example is the fact that after WWII, during the years when it became policy to build and maintain the largest military machine the world has ever known, America also took upon itself, through the Marshall Plan and other measures, the financial relief and rehabilitation of millions of European peoples. If America can afford to underwrite its allies and ex-enemies, it can certainly afford, – and has a much greater obligation, as I see it – to do at least as well by its own no-less-needy countrymen.
            Playboy:
            Do you feel it’s fair to request a multibillion-dollar program of preferential treatment for the Negro, or for any other minority group?
            King:
            I do indeed. Can any fair-minded citizen deny that the Negro has been deprived? Few people reflect that for two centuries the Negro was enslaved, and robbed of any wages – potential accrued wealth which would have been the legacy of his descendants. All of America’s wealth today could not adequately compensate its Negroes for his centuries of exploitation and humiliation. It is an economic fact that a program such as I propose would certainly cost far less than any computation of unpaid wages plus accumulated interest. In any case, I do not intend that his program of economic aid should apply only to the Negro; it should benefit the disadvantaged of all races.
            Playboy:
            If a nationwide program of preferential employment for Negroes were to be adopted, how would you propose to assuage the resentment of whites who already feel that their jobs are being jeopardized by the influx of Negroes resulting from desegregation?
            King:
            We must develop a Federal program of public works, retraining and jobs for all – so that none, white or black, will have cause to feel threatened… together, they could exert massive pressure on the Government to get jobs for all. Together, they could form a grand alliance. Together, they could merge all people for the good of all.
            Playboy:
            If Negroes are also granted preferential treatment in housing, as you propose, how would you allay the alarm with which many white homeowners, fearing property devaluation, greet the arrival of Negroes in hitherto all-white neighborhoods?
            King:
            We must expunge from our society the myths and half-truths that engender such groundless fears as these. In the first place, there is no truth to the myth that Negroes depreciate property. The fact is that most Negroes are kept out of residential neighborhoods so long that when one us is finally sold a home it’s already depreciated. In the second place, we must dispel the negative and harmful atmosphere that has been created by avaricious and unprincipled realtors who engage in “blockbusting.”
            If we had in America really serious efforts to break down discrimination in housing, and at the same time a concerted program of Government aid to improve housing for Negros, I think that many white people would be surprised at how many Negroes would choose to live among themselves, exactly as Poles and Jews and other ethnic groups do.
            Playboy:
            One of the most controversial issues of the past year, apart from civil rights, was the question of school prayer, which has been ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court. [Alabama Gov. George] Wallace, among others, has denounced the decision. How do you feel about it?
            King:
            I endorse it. I think it was correct. Contrary to what many have said, it sought to outlaw neither prayer nor belief in God. In a pluralistic society such as ours, who is to determine what prayer shall be spoken, and by whom? Legally, constitutionally or otherwise, the state certainly has no such right. I am strongly opposed to the efforts that have been made to nullify the decision. They have been motivated, I think, by little more than the wish to embarrass the Supreme Court. When I saw Brother Wallace going up to Washington to testify against the decision at the Congressional hearings, it only strengthened my conviction that the decision was right. (p. 65 – 78)

        • JVictor

          Not sure I’d have the audacity to call you a liar; but, I think you are wrong based upon how that article reads. Care to share some relevant points?

          • cjkcjk

            See my reply to ziggy zoggy below

      • DB1954

        I think it’s fair to say that MLK became increasingly eager for fawning media attention; not that he didn’t deserve it in some measure, but the fact remains that whether or not he was aware of the matter, he was letting the ego strokes get the best of him. King surrounded himself with more than a few figures who were extremely troubling to the government, even to liberal Democrats. To some extent, he may have blinded himself to those types. In short, King’s circle of “friends” had grown so large by the time of his death that he had ceased, for all intents and purposes, to be the true voice of the civil rights movement. Fame has its price.

    • DB1954

      What’s sadder still is that the Obama-Soros controlled media have convinced such a large percentage–to this very day– that Barack Obama and all the other Alinsky acolytes are the “mainstream” of American politics.

  • RAS

    There is nothing that can be said that can heal the tragic loss
    and injury of this horrible deed or comfort the families of those good people
    taken from them. The media need look no further than to itself to find an accessory before the fact. Buy helping to promote biased racial, economic, and cultural divisions they have given those angry and disturbed individuals just the little extra push that they need to justify their horrific actions. On a less tragic side, if there is
    one, Aaron Alexis did follow the Left’s addiction to affirmative action by destroying
    the lives of 75% white people and 25% others. God help us.

    • DB1954

      Well he might have actually done some good, by disabusing more people of the fatuous notion that there’s no such thing as a bad black man. But Obama and the prog media will spin it so that within a month, 55% of the American people will think that it was a right wing conspiracy by white supremacists. And of graduate students, 98% will believe them.

  • arkiePTSD

    The article is illogical for an obvious reason.

    • Bill Thurnau

      please continue…the article is a hypothetical question, logic is not even an issue, What are you trying to insinuate?

    • DB1954

      Which is …? Do you want to clue us, or just sit there staring blankly at your navel?

  • CowboyUp

    I wonder if he watched al Sharpton’s tv show? I’m sure if there was any evidence the author’s hypothetical shooter was a Levin or Rush listener, or watched Hannity, O’Reilly, or any conservative show, we’d know all about it.

  • goomba

    The blood had not even congealed on the floor when senator finestien shoots off her big fat mouth demanding yet more GUN CONTROL. How about MENTAL ILLNESS CONTROL? The past generations had Insane Asylums where they locked the Aaron Alexis’s up in straight jackets and rubber rooms. You need to be locked up senator, your a menace to society with your idiocy.

  • Hewlett Harris

    Another Black, White-Hating racist shoots whites.
    And no one dare says a word.

  • mtnhikerdude

    Insanity Rules .

  • Mr. W. H. Braden

    I asked a Singh taxi driver what percentage of whites does he see as a problem in his cab…30%. I asked what percentage of blacks does he see as a problem in his cab…70%. I say it’s a family issue. The modern black family is not what it was in the past. They had a strong Christian ideals and a father and mother that loved each other. The Left and Hollywood have done nothing to strengthen the family. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are enemies of the black community and few in the black community know this as true.

  • Johnnnyboy

    As long as you can distinguish between the races as a matter of government policy, it will always be exploited by the political class. For that reason the concept of affirmative action effectively eliminated any progress in race relations because it produced a new rational for distinguishing between races. Elements of the government now pander to blacks for black votes, instead of pandering against blacks for the white vote. Same old stuff, same old way, only with a new twist.

  • codefender

    75% of the US Population is white…what’s the point here? I strongly believe the progs are trying, and succeeding in dividing us by race, etc, however I don’t believe for one minute that this schizo went shooting with the intent of only killing certain races/creeds, etc…besides, reports are that he was not very handy with his weapons…

    • DB1954

      He didn’t have to be, at least at first. That’s because when he entered the Naval Yard, he was armed only with a 12 gauge pump action shotgun, presumably with buck shot. And he didn’t open fire until he was on the 4th floor of a building, in close quarters, at virtual point blank range.

  • CainCan

    The Government won’t dare address it – it MUST be workplace violence. I cannot be a hate crime. They don’t want to have to take care of the survivors – just another Ft. Hood. Out of all the senators, congressmen, newscasters – not ONE would entertain the notion. Why? We ALL know why.

  • DeShawn

    This supposed attack was staged, a jew-manufactured hoax brought to you by the Mossad and the jew-controlled CIA. And of course it’s either a Muslim or a black man they always choose to take the fall for it. They control Hollywood and the media so staging something like this is NOTHING. You can read more about it here: http://nodisinfo.com/Home/images-wounded-people-navy/ STOP JEWISH ZIONIST TERROR!

    • UCSPanther

      You are a walking joke, fit only to be mocked.

      Everyone knows you are a pathetic little nutcase with an axe to grind, and frankly, it is hilarious…

      • ziggy zoggy

        He is pretty funny. He’s so nutty he seems like a caricature.

  • 1proactive2

    For every slanted report where blacks, gays, Hispanics and Muslims are allowed protected status and thus major latitude in pretend innocence, I say several articles about the reporter should then be put out for the public to see. Personal stuff about the noble scribe.

    Every sordid detail of the reporter’s private life as well as his or her current address would be made public for all to see along with the details of the crime he or she attempted to minimize or dismiss. It might make for some entertaining reading.

    The method mentioned above is the tactic of morally corrupt reporters, and their liberal counterparts in public education and politics. Let them see how it feels, just for about a year. After that their opinions would be very interesting as to their experience. “What’s good for the goose, etc………”

    • Mrteapot

      As a hispanic guy I rarely seen any special circumstances we’re you claim we we’re protected…maybe with George Zimmerman but hey you right wingers we’re happy with that we’re you not?

      • ziggy zoggy

        Right. Because the daily murders committed by “Hispanics” is all over the news.

      • 1proactive2

        Go to Los Angeles. It’s a “sanctuary city” where hispanics are given carte blanche by the press when it comes to gang terror, and crime in general. As L.A. continues its willful slide into third world status like Detroit, you can bet your last buck the cultural terror and bizarre thinking wrought by blacks and browns will never be held accountable.

        I predict that when the federal and state cash drawers start bottoming out, the public trough wars between hispanics and blacks will be pretty tense. Maybe violent.

        Certainly there are hard working blacks and hispanics, but they are in the minority and thus don’t rate TV time with the left, see also MSM. But both groups share one common trait, and that’s to pledge allegience to their failed countries and continents while being willing to take government handouts as a means of living. The latter is repugnant to a majority of whites, regardless of income level.

        As to “what if I were black or brown”, I’d have floated all the through to a taxpayer paid doctorate with all the set-asides and lowered standards for the so-called “people of color”.

        Stay third world in your thinking. It will provide for you huge dividends in life, paid for by productive people.

        • Mrteapot

          Actually I live in Los Angeles and this sanctuary you speak of is absent in my eyes prolly why alot of white upper class live more up north. This draining of money due to minorities milking the system is propaganda by fox news does it happen yes is it the cause no. It counts for 3% of the overall economy, you forget a housing collapse and two back to back wars over supposed wmd that had a huge take and reason. Without putting blame it’s easy to point fingers at the disenfranchised, hitler did and it worked right….

          • 1proactive2

            I see, it’s them thar wars that’s causing the chronic demands by “minorities” for hand outs and set-asides. Dummy me.

            Anyway, back here on earth, a majority of hispanic kiddies in L.A. schools, whether here legally or not, continue to get free breakfast and lunch meals and a lifetime of free college tuition, the latter if they so choose. Regarding the free meals in schools, this handout paid for by the productive is a gift to the city schools by the higher minds in public education since they don’t want the poor kiddies to feel bad by taking handouts when others are paying their way in life.

            Those hispanics that go through that open collegiate door can expect lower standards in grading and academic expectations overall. In short, a black or hispanic can skate through normal degree requirements at most any public university.

            Enjoy your position at the public trough. The liberal plantation needs slaves, and some races are just meant to be in that category. May the next gang drive-by shooting be named in your honor.

      • Stendec

        You’re “hispanic”? I thought you people were “latino”? When are you wetback greaseballs going to make up your mind?

        • Mrteapot

          You sound mad lemme guess you caught your gf or wife with the gardener lol

          Unlije your douch comment i have no hate to hate

        • Mrteapot

          You sound mad lemme guess you caught your gf or wife with the gardener lol

          Unlije your douch comment i have no hate to hate

          • Stendec

            You also have no brain to think.

          • Mrteapot

            Funny i was going to say something along the lines of you being an angry moron but your first comment i felt was self explanatory of that. O:-)

          • Mrteapot

            I was going to say you sound like an angry moron but thats pretty much implied by your original comment O:-)

        • Mrteapot

          You sound mad, you catch your wife or gf in bed with the gardener huh lol

          Sok jim bob i myself have no hostility to ignorant dumb muuuricans, why cause obama is in office so i know that pisses you off and my gf is caucasian/white i love her
          Have a good day sir :-)

  • TheOrdinaryMan

    Maybe part of the reason that they’re talking “remarkably little about it.” is that Obama himself might have been behind it. Consider this: On August 13, 2008, Bill Gwatney, head of the Arkansas Democrat Party, was gunned down by an unknown assailant. The police chased him, and when he shot at them, they killed him. There was speculation then that Obama was behind it, because he wanted the Arkansas Democrat vote, and he wanted to intimidate Bill Clinton.(Gwatney was a friend of Clinton’s) The shooter was subsequently described as “disgruntled, someone who had just lost his job.” They described Alexis the same way.

  • Mrteapot

    There’s alot of theoretical right wing stories going around, why can’t we say he was a but job instead of saying every black guy is entitled angry mass murder inclined to violence (throw in Obama somewhere) like alot of you are saying.
    As of late alot of the mass shooters have been white so do I say white people are self entitled inclined to violence hate for society? No there’s butt jobs of every race.
    This guy prolly faced some difficulty finding a job or hard time moving up due to racism cause it exsists specially in the military with also sexism and homophobia…but does this make him less guilty, it does not..
    I’ve sealed with self entitled white people who feel they deserve more respect and ignorant ghetto black people. I don’t define a nationality based on one stupid white or black idiot,.this guy was a butt job with a gun.
    These comments have to be the most ridiculous smug right wing BS I’ve ever heard lol

    • TheOrdinaryMan

      Anyone, of any skin color, who gets up every morning and does his best to work(or find a job) and provide for himself/herself deserves some respect. Alternatively, the great majority of people who are looking for work don’t go out and murder. Also, your spelling invites smug comments. Did you mean to say “probably?”

      • Mrteapot

        Yea that’s my dumb auto correct replace butt with nutts, lemme get thus straight who says not to give or not give respect? Alot of people murder for various reasons one being loosing a job or desperate for a job. Really don’t see what your point is.
        But this weird ideological backwards fox news way of looking at things I can’t see. To black and white

        • ziggy zoggy

          Is English your native language?

        • TheOrdinaryMan

          My point is right in front of you–it isn’t necessary to commit murder. Or is that basic civilizational premise beyond your 7th Century comprehension? There’s no ideology here, only the ten commandments.

  • maximilien321

    what Gloria said I am impressed that anybody can get paid
    $8371 in a few weeks on the internet. Get More Info w­w­w.J­A­M­20.ℂ­o­m

  • Grouchy Old Man

    But you do not understand. As members of the race that enslaved his fore bearers and still demeaned him, WE are the parties responsible for Aaron Alexis’ deeds, not him. We are actually not only responsible for his actions but also for his death! At least that is what a good solid liberal person would say.

    The above was rendered with the tongue strongly positioned in a cheek. But, when are we going to stop putting up with this BS? Write the advertisers of all these pundits’ shows and express your displeasure. Money talks.

  • Stendec

    The blacks are the most vile racists in America. For confirmation of this, one need only ask someone who is Korean. Or Thai. Or Indonesian. Or Chinese. Or Vietnamese. Or Japanese (though they don’t put up with a whole lot of black bull$h!t). Or Malaysian. Or Philippine. Or Cambodian. Or Singaporean. Or Burmese…and on and on it goes.

    • CosmoAwakening

      If I were latino or hipanic I would never put myself in the same category as blacks. there are all kinds of excuses for why Detroit is a war zone and ghettos are as they are., where ever Blacks go watch what happends later when others move out becasue of the violence caused by them. When the money from productive whites runs out, there is no more funds also the houses built by them are destroyed. Wake up America over 90 % of prisons are filled with blacks. how much longer will you make excuses

  • Zombee

    Where is the condemnation of this black mass murderer from the typical race-hustlers and the lame-stream media? Many folks consider this another black on white hate crime.

  • CosmoAwakening

    If I were latino or hipanic I would never put myself in the same category as blacks. there are all kinds of excuses for why Detroit is a war zone and ghettos are as they are., where ever Blacks go watch what happends later when others move out becasue of the violence caused by them. When the money from productive whites runs out, there is no more funds also the houses built by them are destroyed. Wake up America over 90 % of prisons are filled with blacks. how much longer will you make excuses