Fact-Busters and the “Mosque-Buster”

Gavin Boby is a British lawyer who established the Law and Freedom Foundation in 2011 to work with communities to resist Islamization, particularly the campaigns of harassment and dominance that mosques routinely bring in their wake. Dubbed the “mosque-buster” because of his success in defeating 16 of 17 mosque applications in British neighborhoods, Boby spoke in Ottawa, Montreal, and Toronto this past week about the principles underlying his pro bono work. When I heard him make his presentation in Ottawa on Monday, February 4, his measured, soft-spoken manner and fact-based analysis contrasted suggestively with the melodramatic denunciations and biased reporting that surrounded his appearance.

Only in a nation hobbled by political correctness of the most mind-boggling sort could a speaker proposing nothing more shocking than residents’ right to defend their neighborhoods be so vociferously denounced. The self-righteous outcries at Boby’s “fearmongering” came not only from the predictable sources—in this case the Canadian arm of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-CAN), fawningly reported on by the press despite its close ties to terrorist organizations—but also from self-proclaimed free-thinkers and mainstream journalists. When everyone involved declares their commitment to free speech while seeking to suppress, distort, and censor Boby’s message, one is left staggered by the House of Mirrors confusion passing for informed debate in this country.

A week before Boby’s scheduled appearance, an editorial appeared in the Ottawa Citizen by two conservative-leaning commentators, Fred Litwin, founder of Ottawa’s Free Thinking Film Society, and Salim Mansur, author of Delectable Lie: A Liberal Repudiation of Multiculturalism. Emphasizing the necessity of distinguishing peaceful from violent forms of Islam, the authors identified Boby as one among a number of “misguided” activists who have apparently made “all Muslims and Islam their enemies.” While not explaining how one can distinguish good from bad Islam in advance—once a mosque has been built and radicalized, it’s too late to deny its permit—Litwin and Mansur charge that Boby’s work is “counter-productive” and imply that his effort to oppose extremism is itself a factor promoting extremism. This position—that merely advocating local, case-by-case legal action to oppose mosque construction is unacceptably intolerant—became the main tenor of the attacks on Boby in the days that followed, attacks that accused him of seeking to “marginalize entire communities” and of engaging in “the most dangerous form of conflict-generation.” Concerns about the self-sequestering of Muslims and their well-documented aggression received only lip service at best from the anti-Boby pundits.

With even self-proclaimed anti-Islamists decrying the talk, it was not surprising to see CAIR-CAN labeling Boby an “anti-Muslim hate-monger” and calling for the Ottawa Public Library to cancel his appearance. Claiming that a tax-payer funded venue should not be used to legitimize Islamophobia, CAIR-CAN cited as proof of Boby’s bigotry his reputed statements that “Islam encourages pedophilia, sex abuse, and pimping.” Has Boby made such statements? And if he has, are they false? The Ottawa Citizen wouldn’t say; it also refrained from any comment on CAIR’s own highly illiberal and immoderate positions and associations. It did, however, see fit to investigate the grassroots organization responsible for bringing Boby to Ottawa: ACT! For Canada. Modeled on Brigitte Gabriel’s Act! For America, it was established by Valerie Price, who maintains its website. The Citizen was not impressed. Noting ACT’s claim to defend Canadian “national security” and “democratic values,” the article focused with disapproval on the fact that ACT’s website “is given over almost entirely to discussion of Islam and terrorism” (yes, these are the threats to security and democracy that concern the organization) and that its presentation was “highly inflammatory.” The single example of “inflammatory” material was the website’s claim that Hitler’s Mein Kampf is a bestseller in the Muslim world—which it is. But truth is no defense against the findings of the thought police: the implication of the article was that ACT! For Canada is a Muslim-hating organization bringing in a Muslim-hating speaker.

Members of ACT (and I am one of them) consoled themselves that so much negative press could lead to wide dissemination of Boby’s message and prompt a good turnout on a very cold (-20 Celsius) Ottawa evening; or perhaps it might keep controversy-averse Canadians away. On Monday night, there was a modest turnout (about 80 people) and limited protest: a small group of dissenters gave interviews in the library lobby but did not seek to disrupt the talk—nor to attend it.

Boby himself did not disappoint. He spoke in lucid and quietly impassioned terms of his advocacy, asserting that it is based not in hatred for Muslims but in love for the British tradition of decency, restraint, and public order that he wished to preserve for future generations. He used reliable studies and poll results to show why mosques are different in kind from churches, synagogues, or other places of worship, being not centers of religious contemplation only but command centers of jihadist recruitment where believers are indoctrinated to support and commit violence against non-believers. A 2011 study by Mordechai Kedar and David Yerushalmi found that 81% of 100 American mosques randomly surveyed contained materials promoting “moderate” (30%) or “severe” (51%) violence, while only 19% of the mosques contained no material promoting violence. (As Boby pondered, what would constitute “moderate violence?”) Perhaps even more significantly, Muslims attending the pro-violence mosques vastly outnumbered those attending the non-violent mosques. The researchers found that non-violent mosques had a mean attendance of only 15 worshipers; on the other hand, violence-promoting mosques, whether falling in the “severe” or “moderate” category, had a mean attendance of 178 worshipers. It is Muslims themselves, Boby concluded from such statistics, who have defined what form of Islam they find authentic.

Boby spoke of the stages of intimidation and neighborhood control that typically follow the establishment of a mosque. At the beginning, there is the relatively non-serious headache of parking problems, the so-called “parking jihad”: residents find their driveways blocked and every space on the street taken up by mosque attenders’ cars. The problems become more severe with time, including verbal harassment (“You can’t dress like that; this is a Muslim area”); attacks on dog owners; the grooming of teenage girls for sexual exploitation; vandalism of non-Muslim homes; and vaguely-threatening visits by Muslim men to non-Muslim home-owners to encourage them to sell up. The most extreme result—seen in some British areas as well as throughout European cities—is the establishment of Islamic-controlled no-go areas where the national law has ceased to operate—complaints to police at any of the stages tend to be worse than useless—and where Sharia compliance is forced on all. The consequences are particularly harsh for Jews, homosexuals, and women who refuse the veil.

Mosques tend to be built in poor neighborhoods where residents—often pensioners, widows, and blue-collar workers—lack the financial resources or cultural confidence to protest. They are rightfully suspicious that their concerns will be dismissed by local councilors as racist. They don’t know how planning applications work and they have been made to feel that any criticism of Muslim ideology or behavior is unacceptable, possibly even criminal. Boby points out that he is merely helping them to use the legal channels created precisely to foster citizen involvement in town planning. Contrary to so many reports on his work, he does not wish nor does he have the power to stop all mosques or to prohibit Muslims from worshipping.

If there are errors in Boby’s evidence or reasoning, none of his detractors could find them, resorting instead to tactics of emotional accusation and misrepresentation. Dissenters at his Ottawa talk asked why he targeted Muslims when there were bad apples in every religion, ignoring his thorough explanation of the special case presented by mosques. Others wondered whether he was appropriately supportive of the “moderates” attempting to renew Islam, ignoring his evidence that mosque-attending Muslims favor the firebrand variety. No matter how patiently Boby set out his proofs—often in the form of devout Muslims’ own horrifying statements of belief—the politically correct charged him with extremism.

Lazy and ideologically slanted representation also dominated press coverage after the event, the exception being the conservative-oriented SUN News Network, which gave fair coverage. An article by the notoriously left-wing Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) referred repeatedly to Boby’s position that “mosques should not be built in non-Muslim areas,” never mentioning why residents might legitimately fear mosques and leaving readers to construe that Boby’s stance (always presented as a lunatic lone crusade) was based on racism. The Ottawa Citizen’s report was just slightly more informative, referring to Boby’s resistance to “what he sees as Islam’s anti-democratic direction.” No evidence for “what he sees” was included, making it seem like a far-out personal opinion. A pious editorial in the Ottawa Citizen following Boby’s talk downplayed his representation of the British situation and asserted that even if some problems do exist, “there are laws” to deal with them.

The overall message of such reporters was clear: there was nothing to learn from Boby, nothing to fear from Islam. As the Ottawa Citizen reporter put it in the first line of his account, “Despite the advance controversy … the city greeted the speech with a collective shrug.” The real shrug, of course, was the reporter’s own when he decided to rely on his politically correct talking points rather than report the substance of Boby’s sober and informative presentation. Many such journalists are determined not to hear what they don’t like—and to prevent others from hearing it as well. They are protected from the outside world by the hard shell of politically correct ignorance: no noise annoys an oyster.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

  • Mary Sue

    Idiots in Ottawa are idiots. This is nothing new. The same kind of complacent liberal jackasses that let Britain get as bad as it has.

  • Michael Copeland

    Yes, Ottawa Citizen, “there are laws for that”. Mr. Boby helps citizens to use them.

  • http://www.adinakutnicki.com AdinaK

    The dhimmification of the west necessitates an omerta re Islam. Its silencing comes from the red/green alliance. It is really that simple. In fact, those who shrilly accuse others of "Islamophobia", often wear their liberal bonafides as their badge of honor. At the same time, they intimate all others into silence, hardly demonstrating their fealty to liberal constructs! What is this, freedoms for thee (leftists) but not for me (conservatives).

    Now that that is settled, the most intrinsic bugaboo to destroy is "Islamophobia". Once done, it will set the freedom – from Sharia – train in motion – http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/06/islamophobia-

    Cart before the horse.

    Adina kutnicki, Israel – http://adinakutnicki.com/about/

  • asim

    what "islamization??" and from a vulnarable and besiged Muslims in America/west?
    jews hate muslims and incite haterd against them because Islam exposed their corruption and dcotoring of the Moses teachings and because they persecuted and murdered jesus.

    Quran, 5:82: "Strongest among men in enmity to the Believers wilt thou find the Jews and Pagans; and nearest among them in love to the Believers wilt thou find those who say: "We are Christians:" because amongst these are men devoted to learning and men who have renounced the world, and they are not arrogant. "

    • john butala

      Ha ha.. is that supposed to be some kind of comedy routine? You accuse Jews of inciting hatred of Muslims without providing any evidence and then repeat the blood libel accusation that's been around for two millenia. I think you might want to look up "hypocrite" in the dictionary sir.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        "I think you might want to look up "hypocrite" in the dictionary sir."

        Anyone who quotes the koran is by definition a hypocrite.



      your fellow racist muslims kill people all over the world and then you cry like old women when Infidels fight back.

      Your fellow racist muslims kill Jews, Hindus, Christians, Buddhists, Bahais, Zoroastrians.

      Where? In Israel, Egypt, Nigeria, Philippines, Algeria, UK, France, Beslan Russia, USA.

      I see a day when Mecca will necessarily be totally destroyed, in retaliation.

      • Parenthetical Phrase

        I agree with you, Screw, but when Mecca is destroyed, it will be because of Muslim terrorism and a revolt against the Saudi gov't. Muslims will be killing Muslims all over the world, just as they are now.

    • http://frontpage richard sherman

      There is not a single word in the Old Testament about killing or humiliating muslims…The Koran is filled with passages celebrating the humiliating and killing of Jews. Muslims celebrate the sociopathic actions of Muhammad at Quarayza where is personally decapitated 900 Unarmed Jews…Case Closed.

      • Dan

        Well, the Old Testamnet was written a couple thousand years before Islam existed so it's only slightly suprising it says nothing about Muslims. But there is certainly lots of bloddthirsty stuff in the Old Testament, slaughtering other ethnic groups/tribes. Religion is a universal poison. That said, some are worse than others. Jainism is perhaps the least offensive of the god delusions.

        • objectivefactsmatter

          "Well, the Old Testamnet was written a couple thousand years before Islam existed so it's only slightly suprising it says nothing about Muslims."

          Yeah, but he's talking to a Muslim. They believe all prophets were Muslims. As absurd as it sounds, we need to teach Muslims when Mo invented their fantastic religion and it's fictitious history.

          There is no Christian or Hebrew canonical text that mentions Islam other than indirectly when talking about Satanic deceptions.

    • kafir4life

      asim – would it be correct to assume that you're one of those moon god worshippers that follow allahahaha, who was invented by the pedophilic false prophet, mohamat? The same mohamat that shat the koran into the sand following sex with, then later a meal of his favorite pig, or "mom" as he called her? You should keep in mind that islam is a gutter cult, and muslims are the gutter cultists.
      Tell me you don't giggle-snort every time you hear of a muslim killing a muslim for being the wrong "style" of muslim, or not quite muslim "enough"! That's some good stuff!!

    • Mary Sue

      The Quran is such a confused mess its verses are not even in chronological order, and it contradicts itself far more than the Bible is said to do.

      Dude, Islamization is when that Muslim Patrol bunch in the United Kingdom go around telling women who are fully dressed to "cover up" because they dare to show off their nose-hairs, and telling men to pour out their beer.

      • pfwag

        Islam solves their many contradictions in the Quran through the doctrine of "Nasekh" (abrogation). Basically when there are contradictory statements, the latest pronunciation negates or “abrogates” an earlier one. The concept of abrogation in the Quran is that Allah replaced or superseded an earlier ayat (singular ayah), which means a sign or miracle which includes a verse in the Quran. Some references for the principle of Nasekh are as follows:

        Whatever communications we abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring one better than it or like it. Do you not know that Allah has power over all things? Qur'an 2:106

        Allah doth blot out or confirm what He pleaseth: with Him is the Mother of the Book. Qur'an 13:39

        And when We change (one) communication for (another) communication, and Allah knows best what He reveals, they say: You are only a forger. Nay, most of them do not know. Qur'an 16:101

        Two surahs, Maidah and Taubah, are particularly violent, barbaric, and simply vile. They contain numerous "kill the infidels" commands from Allah. In the Quran, they are the 5th and 9th surah respectively. However, in chronological order they are 112 and 113 respectively. There is nothing in the very last and short 114th surah, Nasr, that abrogates anything in Maidah and Taubah.

        • objectivefactsmatter

          That's how it solves the "contradiction" about whether it's a "religion of peace" or a religion of deception. It's the latter.

          That doesn't solve the other silliness.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      "..what "islamization??" and from a vulnarable and besiged Muslims in America/west?
      jews hate muslims and incite haterd against them because Islam exposed their corruption and dcotoring of the Moses teachings and because they persecuted and murdered jesus."

      We need to find another planet for you so that you can convince everyone about the "facts" of the virtual world you live in.

      Jesus was a Jew. People persecuted him. Not all Jews collectively. The texts distinguishes between the Romans and the Jews because those were some of the people on the scene. It's not an indictment of Jews collectively unless you're a psychotic bigot like Mo. Funny how nobody goes around attacking "Romans" or Italians for persecuting Jesus. Hmm. Mo must have been pretty ignorant about the facts of history…the ones that are actually true that is.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      "Quran, 5:82"

      Earth to Mars; we're not buying that BS. Save it for your dupes. And no, you can't have the moon. Worship it from the planet we already gave you. And yes the flag stays too.

  • Guest

    Everything Mr. Boby said is true and he is only speaking from his own experiences. We all know what happens in Europe eventually makes it across the "pond". I for one am grateful that organizations such as ACT! FOR CANADA, exist and are watching out for us. Thanks to them for bringing in Mr. Boby and openning our eyes as to what may eventually happen here, if it hasn't already.

    • yarlos

      you are right

  • Gee

    I do not believe that the issue is liberals. Am not from Canada or Britian, but am a social liberal – I just don't happen to be a leftist. I agree with what Mr. Boby is doing.

    I stand for free speech and freedom of religion for everybody, and leftists are the ones that oppose those freedoms – not liberals.

    • Mary Sue

      Well, in Canada, we're starting to see the kind of Leftists (Progressives, really) who oppose freedom of speech. They think they are liberal because they're for gay marriage etc. But they've been steeped so hard in the Identity Politics that they think that any action against a perceived minority is "bigotry". And to them, the essence of liberalism is a staunch commitment to "anti-bigotry". The problem starts when they take the wrong side, such as they do when they support the Islamist Oppressors who go around telling people to pour out their beer or go cover up.

    • Cat K

      What on earth is the difference between a "leftist" and a "liberal," anyway? I don't think many other people use these two terms as you do.
      Perhaps you identify with classical liberalism which is not what "liberals" practice today.
      For me, there is truth and there are lies. Today's liberals lie, others attempt to tell the truth.
      Today, to openly side with facts instead of irrationality takes courage.

      • JacksonPearson

        "What on earth is the difference between a "leftist" and a "liberal," anyway? I don't think many other people use these two terms as you do."

        There is no difference. It's like they're saying, that they're just part pregnant, when in reality, their protruding belly is a dead give away!.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        "What on earth is the difference between a "leftist" and a "liberal," anyway?"

        There are generalizations that get confusing because the people themselves are confused about what these labels are supposed to indicate. "Socially liberal" can mean anything from mere tolerance of homosexuality to full blown communism. If you talk to individuals, you need to ask them what they're talking about if something seems out of place. OTOH, there are lots of dupes too. Few people admit outright that they're leftist but some who claim to be socially liberal are merely tolerant of social liberties, like most conservatives. Conservatives just don't want the state telling us where and how to make these moral decisions, like whether a Christian church should celebrate a gay wedding and so forth.

  • morgan

    I reluctantly agree with ‘Screw': making a 100 foot deep crater the middle of the city of Mecca would decisively end Islam. I hope there is another way to end this delusion.

    I have heard Boby speak and everything he says is based on unchallengeable facts. The Muslims who attend mosques do in fact support violent jihad and are supremacists, rather than ‘moderates’. Opinion surveys have routinely shown that over 60% of Muslims worldwide support discriminatory Sharia law and a global caliphate dictatorship.

  • Murray

    I was at Boby's talk the next day in Montreal. Interestingly one member of the audience asked why he doesn't include community demonstrations to buttress his cause. He responded that he has faith in the legal and judiciary channels still available in a democracy. His success record, 15/16 has born that out.

  • Rev. Roy

    They are just like the "Borg". They do not "assimilate", they do not want to assimilate and they will never assimilate. They are world conquerers with a 1,400 year history of murder, mayhem and massacre and they "are back" !!!!!!
    Revelation 20:4…
    "And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years". King James Bible
    Hmmmmmmmmm? Who "beheads" people on this planet???? Are you ready ?? The only way to "be ready" is to call on the Name above all Names, Jesus Christ, and accept His offer of forgiveness through His blood that He shed for your sins 2,000 years ago and invite Him to take charge of your life so that you can spend an Eternity with the only Deity who loved you so much that He died for you. Allah demands that YOU die for him. Take your pick.
    Rev. Roy….<><

  • Ghostwriter

    I wonder if Mr. Boby would like to come to America and give his talk. It would be very interesting to see.

  • Western Canadian

    I find that Salim Mansur spoke out in such a manner to be very sad. I enjoyed his columns in the local paper, and regret that they ended some months ago. This is NOT what I would have expected from him…

    • Geoffrey Blake

      Remember that, in the U.S., the Muslims tried such oppression in Dearborn, Michigan, arresting Christians simply for being Christians. They were defeated in court, but the arrests never should have happened in the first place. Now Dearborn owes the defendants over one hundred thousand dollars for violating the constitutional rights of the Christians arrested.
      These are not just happening in Canada, but te stupid Liberals ar trying to control everyone with their political correctness attacks.

      • Mary Sue

        The cops are idiots, for sure, just like the idiot Ontario Provincial Police that arrested property owners at Caledonia instead of the violent squatting extremist Indians, or the banana-republic style arrest (and driving/banishing them off the reserve) of Global, CBC, and other Canadian News Organizations' reporters by the Tribal Police at Attawapiskat, home of the dictator in chief Theresa Spence, She of the Fake Hunger Strike Of Fish Soup. This is what happens when the cops become "political" and "politically correct" instead of following the law.

        Such cops should run for office instead of being in law enforcement.

        • objectivefactsmatter

          "Such cops should run for office instead of being in law enforcement."

          If a Jihadi can get elected president and that president can nominate jihadis for cabinet positions, who knows what else is going on in local agencies? We can just imagine who those cops were and or who they report to. I'm sure many took their oaths on the koran, or with their fingers crossed.

  • Kingsley

    Gratified to read Fiamengo's report. I was at Roby's presentation in Ottawa and was disgusted by the Citizen's reporting. We should be grateful that Act for Canada is taking the lead in starting resistance to and ideology irrevocably dedicated to establishing Sharia, an expression of 7th century Bedouin tribal barbarism, as the only law for the entire world. Any one who claims to be Muslim must support "jihad" in order to achieve that goal. Enthusiasm and means can vary; but, the goal cannot be denied. I dread the possibility that my grand children could be forced to "live" as semi-slaves in an Islamic Canada.

  • Dan

    What a nicely written, logical piece by Janice. Mosques as the preview to no-go zones is a major problem in several European countries now. Will this pattern follow in Canada?

  • Colin Jones

    Muslims the world over worship a paedophile. End of story.
    Their treatment of women disqualifies them from any conversation let alone social contact with the rest of humanity.
    They are busy setting up schools here in Australia and it is not too much of a stretch of the imagination as to what they shall be teaching in those schools; read Madrassa.

  • 11bravo

    Where is video of this speech?

  • Canadave

    Asim … Do millions of muslims flee muslim countries and emigrate to the west to be besieged? Jews don't hate muslims but muslims bring animosity to themselves by propagating and practicing the lies and barbarism of their illiterate false prophet Mo. The only sin of the Jews in the eyes of the muslims and the reason muslims hate Jews, calling them the descendants of apes and pigs is because they wisely, correctly and intelligently didn't accept the false prophet Mo as a prophet. Prophets only came to the people of God's covenant, the descendants of Isaac (not Abraham) and hence pagan arabs cannot be prophets and hence Mo is a false prophet. The Jews didn't persecute and murder Jesus. He was murdered by the Romans (crucifixion is a Roman punishment) as they considered him to be a threat to their rule. If the Jews killed him he would have been stoned. If you took the time to educate yourself you would discover that Mo's tribal god allah was the pagan moon god and was believed at the time to be the "chief amongst the gods." In other words, the pagan arabs believed in many gods and allah was only one of them which means they were polytheists. Mo was an admirer of the monotheistic religions of Judaism and Christianity and only declared his own tribe's favoured god as the one and only god and adopted Jewish beliefs along the way such as Jewish kosher food laws . A knowledge of history proves that your god allah is a lie, the koran is a lie and Mo is a liar. Your claim that the jews doctored the teachings of Moses is another muslim and koranic lie. The Torah pre-dates the koran by thousands of years so obviously the koran doctored the teachings of Moses. A childish accusation of anyone as descendants of apes and pigs in itself shows the koran to be childish as well as a lie. By the way I am not a Jew but will support any people like the Jews who have contributed more to civilization, the arts and science than any other people, especially arabs. Arabs claim that Islam can claim advancements to the arts and science but if you examine history closely, the roots of their claims can be attributed to India and China. The only thing arabs can claim a fame to is barbarism.

  • JacksonPearson

    "Islamophobia": The fear of speaking out against the rapidly growing religion/ideology that is out to repress all who do not follow its doctrine.

    ISLAM: The Religion of Peace (and a big stack of dead bodies)
    Islamic Terrorists Have Carried out More Than 20,365 Deadly Terror Attacks Since 9/11

    Wherever Islam Spread, Darkness Follows with Death and Destruction

  • Herb Benty

    To Asim comment above: Your lies concerning Jews and the Bible may sound good in Pakistan but not in America or Canada. 1. Islam's attempt to obliterate the Jewish nation of Israel will fail as The Almighty God loves and has eternal covenant with Israel. 2. Islam is the attempted corruption of the Jewish Torah, Psalms and Prophets with more twisting of Christians New Testament. 3. God sent His Son to save some Gentiles along with the Israelites, He came to die, " in the house of His friends". The lamb, "without spot or blemish" was killed by God the Father( remember Abraham and Issac which was a "type" of what God had planned). Islam is in deep trouble because THEY espouse murder.

  • LindaRivera

    Abu Baseer in London: “One of the goals of immigration is the revival of the duty of jihad and enforcement of power over the infidels. Immigration and jihad go together.

    Non-Muslims in non-Muslim countries DON’T want Muslim immigration for the reason stated by devout Muslim, Baseer and because of commands in the Quran and teachings in mosques!

    Founder of Islam, Mohammed: “I have been made victorious with terror”, “Wage war on the infidel and kill them until Islam is dominant” (Koran 8:39).

    40,000 Iran agents in Western Hemisphere
    Now hidden in Latin America, awaiting ‘operations’ against U.S.
    “We must get ready for global operation. … Our fellow fighters are present in all five continents of the world. … An international jihad must be provoked; we must fear no one.”

    The Revolutionary Guards’ intelligence division runs operations out of mosques.

    Those operations include recruitment, reconnaissance and transfer of arms and cash.

    This source also verified then that all Imam Ali Mosques are controlled by regime intelligence operatives and that the cells are well placed in Europe and America for terrorist acts… http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/army-of-iran-sadists-p

  • LindaRivera

    Protect Innocents! END ALL MUSLIM IMMIGRATION before it is too late!

    Turkish Prime Minister, Erdogan, explained the function of mosques. Erdogan: The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers…

    The Quran teaches hate, violence and mass murder of non-Muslims and commands Muslims to wage jihad against non-Muslims and conquer all nations. In a dreadful act of treason many millions of Muslims, soldiers of Allah, have been imported into our countries by our leaders, in order to facilitate jihad and Islamic conquest of our nations. It is the greatest betrayal by nations’ leaders in all of human history.

    Koran 9:5 “Kill Jews and Christians wherever you find them”.

    “The whole of Europe will become Islamic. Like the army of the sultan we will conquer Rome.”
    − Former Turkish Prime Minister Necmettin Erbakan, June 2002

  • LindaRivera

    ISLAM IS NOT A RELIGION! It is a totalitarian, POLITICAL system that calls for the savage genocide of non-Muslim innocents!

    Founder of Islam, Mohammed: “I have been made victorious with terror”, “Wage war on the infidel and kill them until Islam is dominant” (Koran 8:39)

    “Islam will return to Europe as a conqueror and victor, after being expelled from it twice – once from the South, from Andalusia, and a second time from the East, when it knocked several times on the door of Athens.” Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi, leading Sunni cleric

    “One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”
    – Houari (Mohamed) Boumedienne, President of Algeria, 1965 – 1978, in a 1974 speech at the UN

  • ObamaYoMoma

    All of these debates are predicated on the absurdity that Islam is a religion and that Muslims are just like any other religious adherents. However, Islam is an Islamic religion, but to us in the West Islam is really a very aggressive form of totalitarianism that aims to subjugate all non-Muslims into harsh and degrading dhimmitude. Moreover, all Muslims, not just the violent jihadists that we misconstrue as being terrorists, are jihadists. Otherwise, they are blasphemous apostates that per the dictates of Islam must be executed.

    Indeed, mass Muslim immigration to the West is a clandestine form of non-violent jihad that takes place via stealth and deception and for the most part almost totally unopposed and undetected. How do I know? Simple, even though mass Muslim immigration to the West has been ongoing for decades, no one can point to one single place on the planet where a population of Muslim immigrants have successfully assimilated and integrated into contributing and productive members of their newly adopted countries. Not one. Instead, just like clockwork they have formed hundreds of Muslim no-go zones ruled by Sharia as tiny statelets within the greater states to which they have migrated.

  • http://twitter.com/TophStewart @TophStewart

    Here is an idea. Lets try to build a church and a synagogue in a majorly Muslim area. Let us see the results.