U.S. Foreign Policy in ‘Whirlfall’

2012-12-21T191518Z_01_WAS209_RTRMDNP_3_USA-OBAMA-STATEA quarter of a century has elapsed since the Iron Curtain fell, heralding the collapse of the Soviet empire that had perverted human rights, trampled economic freedoms and subjugated its citizens utterly.  The implosion of USSR brought an end to the decades-old Cold War that had been the dominant framework of international relations since the end of World War II.

The disintegration of the communist world meant victory for the liberal democracies.  It yielded an “American Moment,” the brief window in which the United States was unchallenged in its global hegemony.

But victory also left the West disoriented within a new landscape no longer defined by the bipolar battle between the free world and the Warsaw Pact. Without clearly identifiable villains, the West lost its compass.

Quickly, global militant fundamentalist organizations, fueled by an ideological hatred of the West, attacked it at large and in its heart. America took up arms in response, but the legitimacy of its wars would soon be challenged by the growing number of casualties and concerns over its invasions of foreign territory, while domestic resistance to the spiraling cost of these campaigns, along with tactical and strategic mistakes, stymied their rapid and decisive conclusion.

Appalling flaws in communicating the rationale for and the justice of the Western military enterprises significantly weakened the effectiveness of the operations as a loose coalition of anti-Western forces and opponents to American foreign interventions used every channel at their disposal to delegitimize Washington. The conflicts’ narratives were turned on their head: The theme of “War for Freedom” against aggressive Fundamentalists became the object of ridicule and was eclipsed by images of innocent civilians resisting the oppressive Western armies invading their lands.

Elected on a wave of popular discontent with both the economy and America’s overseas adventures, President Obama initiated a strategy of reconciliation with the country’s enemies, focusing on Arab states and the Muslim world. Pledged to reduce the US footprint in foreign conflicts, the President of the United States adopted a policy of appeasement based on the precept that “it is better to be loved than to be feared.”

This policy, which is hastening the voluntary disintegration of the Western sphere of influence, is creating a vacuum into which old and new powers moved with incredible alacrity, led by realpolitik statesmen with scant regard to Western sensibilities, undeterred from using force to attain their goals. In the Middle East, in Africa, and in Asia, state actors such as Russia and China, as well as fundamentalist and terrorist groups such as the Taliban or Al-Shabaab, have moved in. Even in parts of South America – America’s “back yard” – the United States is being left behind.

Yet, as gentle and as troubling as the President’s approach towards the West’s adversaries has become, it is increasingly tougher with America’s allies, striking a blow to their interests. All over the world, dismayed friends of the United States have been required to bow to their opponents and to relinquish national security principles they consider fundamental to their survival. Decreeing that his approach would transform anti-American wolves into lambs, the leader of the free world is treating loyal allies as vassals, not only abandoning them to the maelstrom unleashed by his retreat, but handcuffing them by his policy of appeasement. Kept in containment, they remain as wounded soldiers abandoned on the battlefield.

Current US policy may be summarized by a new term, “Whirlfall” – a kind of “perfect storm” formed by the whirlpool generated by the United States’ declining global presence that is reinforced by the windfall that America’s global rivals are reaping from US-imposed policy restrictions on its allies.

Sooner or later, confrontations will start between those rival new great powers, in their quest for strategic interests and natural resources. Unhampered by scruples, they will be free to wreak war, death and misery in the arenas vacated by America – until, inevitably, they become strong enough and confident enough to raise a frontal challenge to the democratic West itself.

Then, with freedom, liberalism, democracy and its pursuit of happiness under threat, America will have no option but to respond.  It will have to fight to reestablish its security perimeter and reassert its interests – but from a position of self-imposed weakness with its associated additional cost in lives and resources.

But to whom will Washington be able to turn for help? Sucked into the raging whirlpool, America’s allies will be hamstrung in their attempts to sustain themselves as their rivals nibble at every piece of the cake left to them.  Not only will they have little strength to join in a reassertion of Western interests – they will be wary of placing their trust again in their unreliable former ally.

By the time Washington wakes up, the “whirlfall” will be at America’s door.  But how many of its allies will answer the call when the West needs them most?

Jérôme Vitenberg is a political analyst with a special interest in international affairs. He has taught political science and International relations for the London School of Economics through the University of London’s International Programs at DEI College, Greece.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ Jason P

    We are losing a cultural war.

    Fundamentalists, as you note, are on the rise not because of our lack of military resolve. This is an internal decay within these societies driven by a rotting culture. We can’t fix their culture.

    We can’t even fix ours. Our nation is in decay. The growth of paternalistic government is killing the economic machine that made our military might possible. Our children aren’t taught pride in our founding principles but shame for not being egalitarian and socialistic. The enemy’s culture, Islam, is presented in fairytale terms.

    We have been disarmed by our cultural leaders.

  • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ Jason P

    We are losing a cultural war.

    Fundamentalists, as you note, are on the rise not because of our lack of military resolve. This is an internal decay within these societies driven by a rotting culture. We can’t fix their culture.

    We can’t even fix ours. Our nation is in decay. The growth of paternalistic government is killing the economic machine that made our military might possible. Our children aren’t taught pride in our founding principles but shame for not being egalitarian and socialistic. The enemy’s culture, Islam, is presented in fairytale terms.

    We have been disarmed by our cultural leaders.

  • SoCalMike

    This guy perfectly sums up the international geopitical scene better than anyone I’ve read.
    With few exceptions we really don’t have a serious foreign policy commentariat in the US.
    Foreign Affairs, Foreignpolicy.com and the Hill are jokes more akin to Tiger Beat Magazine than anything serious.

  • SoCalMike

    This guy perfectly sums up the international geopitical scene better than anyone I’ve read.
    With few exceptions we really don’t have a serious foreign policy commentariat in the US.
    Foreign Affairs, Foreignpolicy.com and the Hill are jokes more akin to Tiger Beat Magazine than anything serious.

  • Battle of Athens

    ” they will be wary of placing their trust again in their unreliable former ally.”

    This is something I liked about George Bush. He stuck with the war through thick and thin.

    Our allies understood it. but they also understand that a rock steady president can be replaced by a Santa Clause, “peace in our times” candidate.

    So why ally with the U.S.?

    It is much easier to beat swords into welfare benefits if you tell people that America has no enemies and the world is a safe and gentle place.

  • Battle of Athens

    ” they will be wary of placing their trust again in their unreliable former ally.”

    This is something I liked about George Bush. He stuck with the war through thick and thin.

    Our allies understood it. but they also understand that a rock steady president can be replaced by a Santa Clause, “peace in our times” candidate.

    So why ally with the U.S.?

    It is much easier to beat swords into welfare benefits if you tell people that America has no enemies and the world is a safe and gentle place.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Of course, Obama’s foreign policy has been incredibly insane, but if I remember correctly, GWB’s wasn’t any better, and what’s worse is he was alleged to be a right winger and a Republican on top of it. Let’s face it, both Republicans and Dhimmicrats alike are incredibly incompetent today, which is why we treat jihad (holy war) like it’s only terrorism, at the same time we also let millions of them invade us via mass Muslim immigration. This country is not only going down the toilet via Marxism, it’s being sold out to Islam at the same time.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Of course, Obama’s foreign policy has been incredibly insane, but if I remember correctly, GWB’s wasn’t any better, and what’s worse is he was alleged to be a right winger and a Republican on top of it. Let’s face it, both Republicans and Dhimmicrats alike are incredibly incompetent today, which is why we treat jihad (holy war) like it’s only terrorism, at the same time we also let millions of them invade us via mass Muslim immigration. This country is not only going down the toilet via Marxism, it’s being sold out to Islam at the same time by both major political parties.

  • tranhong

    The growth of paternalistic government is killing the economic machine that made our military might possible.bao ve Our children aren’t taught pride in our founding principles but shame for not being egalitarian and socialistic.

    link website dịch vụ bảo vệ

  • tranhong

    The growth of paternalistic government is killing the economic machine that made our military might possible.bao ve Our children aren’t taught pride in our founding principles but shame for not being egalitarian and socialistic.

    link website dịch vụ bảo vệ

  • James Hubbs

    The Middle East is only a part of many pieces to the Obama doctrine, turning it upside down scares a lot of people. Betraying Israel and sadly I think he will do much more to them later when the time is right. Being out played by Putin or maybe he never played at all has opened more eyes around the world. Giving money and support to the muslim brotherhood and allowing them access to the White House Now secret deals being made with Iran by his Iranian born advisor Valerie Jarrett giving them concessions and getting nothing in return. Which directly threatens Israel ! Obama gave away British nuclear submarine secrets to the Chinese, Agreed to nuclear deals with Russia giving them a clear strategic advantage. Firing over 200 generals and high ranking officers, cutting out military down to a level that will affect their ability to fight effectively. Then orders our ICBM’s to be dismatled even though they were not part of the SALT treaty. We have lots of enemies around the world but the biggest threat is in the White House.

  • James Hubbs

    The Middle East is only a part of many pieces to the Obama doctrine, turning it upside down scares a lot of people. Betraying Israel and sadly I think he will do much more to them later when the time is right. Being out played by Putin or maybe he never played at all has opened more eyes around the world. Giving money and support to the muslim brotherhood and allowing them access to the White House Now secret deals being made with Iran by his Iranian born advisor Valerie Jarrett giving them concessions and getting nothing in return. Which directly threatens Israel ! Obama gave away British nuclear submarine secrets to the Chinese, Agreed to nuclear deals with Russia giving them a clear strategic advantage. Firing over 200 generals and high ranking officers, cutting out military down to a level that will affect their ability to fight effectively. Then orders our ICBM’s to be dismatled even though they were not part of the SALT treaty. We have lots of enemies around the world but the biggest threat is in the White House.

  • stephencarter

    It’s unbelievable how much damage a US President can do. It’s obscene how the US political system holds that office so little to account. In a parliamentary system the head of government has to answer hostile questions during Question Period from the Opposition benches on a daily basis. Obama is virtually free to blunder around destroying all in sight without ever being held to account. The compliant, sycophantic media doesn’t hold him to account either, in fact they cover for him. Is it any surprise such a dysfunctional system would produce such destruction?

  • kienanvinh

    The compliant, sycophantic media doesn’t hold him to account either

    view link website : http://thietkexaynhadep.com.vn