When Scandals Reach Into the Oval Office

obamadThere is no evidence whatever that the IRS and other scandals reach into the oval office — or so Jay Carney tells us. But is that really so?

Ben Swann of Fox19 in Cincinnati has a convincing method of figuring out the lowest level at which the IRS scandals must have originated. Starting with the fact that six individual IRS agents sent letters to conservative groups that were essentially similar, Swann suggested a simple way of determining the identity of the senior person who either originated the practice or passed through an order that came from higher up. First, get the names of the people these six were supervised by. If that produces six different names, get the names of the people they were supervised by. Keep doing this until you have a single name — the common supervisor. Swann found that single name: Cindy Thomas.

Swann’s logic is hard to argue with. But let’s see what happens when we apply his method to the case reported by Peggy Noonan in her May 23 column in the Wall Street Journal. Ms. Noonan explained what happened when in 2010 Catherine Engelbrecht sent applications for tax exempt status to the IRS. “The U.S. government came down on her with full force,” said Noonan:

In December 2010 the FBI came to ask about a person who’d attended a King Street Patriots function. In January 2011 the FBI had more questions. The same month the IRS audited her business tax returns. In May 2011 the FBI called again for a general inquiry about King Street Patriots. In June 2011 Engelbrecht’s personal tax returns were audited and the FBI called again. In October 2011 a round of questions on True the Vote. In November 2011 another call from the FBI. The next month, more questions from the FBI. In February 2012 a third round of IRS questions on True the Vote. In February 2012 a first round of questions on King Street Patriots. The same month the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms did an unscheduled audit of her business. (It had a license to make firearms but didn’t make them.) In July 2012 the Occupational Safety and Health Administration did an unscheduled audit. In November 2012 more IRS questions on True the Vote. In March 2013, more questions. In April 2013 a second ATF audit.

Let’s give this the Ben Swann treatment. We are looking for the common supervisor. How far up the chain do we have to go to find that person? First came harassment by the FBI, which is a part of the Justice Department. But we also have involvement of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, another agency within the Justice Department. To find the common supervisor we have to go higher than the FBI Director and the ATF Director to arrive at the person they both report to: Eric Holder, the Attorney General. So far, Swann’s logic indicates that the order to target and harass conservative groups could not have come from anyone lower than cabinet rank.

If the IRS and OSHA were also agencies within the Justice Department, we could say no more than that Eric Holder originated or transmitted the order. But that is not so: IRS is a part of the Treasury Department, and OSHA is part of the Department of Labor. When all of this was going on Timothy Geithner was Secretary of the Treasury, and Hilda Solis the Secretary of Labor. The order must therefore have gone through all three cabinet members, but could not have originated with any of the three. Who is their common supervisor? There is only one person who fits that description: the President of the United States. If Swann is right that we must look to Cindy Thomas as the conduit for the order to misuse the IRS for political purposes, then it must also be reasonable to infer that the order to use three departments of the federal government to harass, intimidate, and obstruct the administration’s political opponents came from President Obama himself.

Evidence is not the same as proof. Proof comes as evidence accumulates. But the fact that Barack Obama is the only common supervisor of all the corrupt activity in various departments of the federal government is certainly compelling evidence. Carney’s insistence that there is no evidence whatever that this scandal goes as high as the oval office is simply wrong.

This evidence is obviously strong enough to require both Carney and the President himself to answer questions about it. Any questioner should be careful to explain what the stakes are: everyone knows that third world despots typically use all of the resources of the governments they head to weaken and obstruct their political opponents, and to prevent any possibility of a successful electoral challenge. Is that what the President did, and what he thinks is compatible with our system of government?

John M. Ellis is an emeritus professor and former Dean of the Graduate Division at UC Santa Cruz.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

  • VHG1

    There is evidence! The meetings, the coordinated blast fax slogans between the dems and the IRS and an Obama who railed against Citizens United in a SOTU speech ridiculing the SCOTUS! It’s there, get it! Do a survey, ask how many people believe Obama is directly involved!

  • Omar

    Sadly, The most corrupt administration in the history of the world. Carter was the worst president, clintoon impeached, the savior so rotten even satan blushes. All progressive, liberal dems. So much damage to God’s blessed country by 3 evil men corrupted by their own egos.

  • gunsmithkat

    It’s the Chicago Way! Chicago on the Potomac.

  • Jim1904

    Zero has successfully nationalized the Chicago way. While our senators and congressmen sit idly by.

  • CurmudJohn

    Sing Along! Chicago! Chicago! That totalitarian town!

  • http://shugartpoliticalaction.shugartmedia.com/uncommonsense/ Chris Shugart

    Don Corleone never had to tell his crime bosses what to do. They all knew the game plan: Take over by whatever means necessary.

  • tokoloshiman

    What a travesty it is that at a time when the USA should be united , patriotic and strong, it is instead divided, ineffective, and weak.
    The man in charge is a fake , an orator at times but also a buffoon at times and whose very position as the leader of the USA and therefore the free world , is in question.
    That all efforts to examine this most egregious of all claims is indicative of the
    left wing congress’ ability to absorb lies and ignore them to the detriment of the nation at large.
    The scandals mounting up since the worst one, benghazi , show that this risible administration is way off track and out to destroy the very fabric of the once great
    and decisive USA.

  • CowboyUp

    OSHA is only supposed to respond to complaints filed by current employees of a company. It’s possible they broke their own rules to harass King Street Patriots, and it’s doubtful they would do that, unless they hade orders and clearance from above their agency to do so.

  • Dylan Felts

    All roads lead to……..Obama.

  • nimbii

    Thank you Dr. Ellis. Let’s continue the research and sooner or later the vector will become visible enough.

  • Joel Cairo

    I find it amazing and improbable that this would have originated with someone from U.C. Santa Cruz. Perhaps he is the exception that proves the rule.

    More than likely, Swann’s logic is correct here. Besides, it is unlikely that these people would all have been acting independently. There must have been some form of coordination. It could not have been the fat man.

  • Elizabeth Cape Cod

    There was no evidence at first that Watergate reached into the oval office either, but THAT didn’t deter democrats from expecting and conducting a thorough investigation, without fielding obstacles at every turn from that administration.. Republicans have every right to expect the same without recrimination from the peanut gallery!!!!


    Certainly the administration as a whole is corrupt. The problem is that all Leftists think exactly alike, and all believe in using the power of the state to suppress political opponents. Thus it is entirely possible that high-ranking officials in the various departments all acted independently against Conservative groups. Thus we can’t be sure that Obama was behind it all, although I personally would say the chances are about 50-50.

  • chiefpontiac

    The road leads to Valerie Jarrett with the complicity of our dear leader. Marxists think alike. Jarrett wears the pants in this administration. She put the kibosh on the Bin Laden killing on at least two occasions and she wasn’t happy when Obama eventually went through with it.

  • USARetired

    The only reason the IRS visited the Oval Office so many times was to conduct ‘Skull Skulduggery’ in person, thus no trail of evidence. Congress must start placing witnesses under oath, and investigate in earnest! We know O’Bozo will lie, however most witnesses under oath usually tell the truth