<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unilateralism, Obama-Style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=unilateralism-obama-style</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 05:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: WW4</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5269270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WW4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5269270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, &quot;amazingly stupid&quot; is thinking every choice he makes is wrong and detrimental.



Prioritizing and getting bin Ladin just like he said he would in 2008? How about the amount of al Qaeda leadership decimated under his watch? Giving the order to take out the Somali pirates? Anti-American?

Conservatives hate Obamacare, right?  But they just have no idea why; because what they think it is, it isn&#039;t. First president to actually reform heath care after 35 years of talking about it. Under it, the uninsured will be insured. The poorest will thus incur costs to us we know, rather than costs to us made up for by inflated imaginary numbers. The ones who can afford care will have access to a marketplace where there will be competition for their dollar. Consumers will be more aware of the real costs they incur and be more informed about health care decisions. Yeah, it&#039;s a bit half-@ssed, I&#039;ll agree. But consumer choice, market competition...anti-American? Huh?


No one was &quot;racist&quot; for opposing Obamacare--just foolish, because they lacked the confidence or ability to make a real argument.  The problem was--his main opponent pioneered Obamacare. Obamacare was essentially first dreamed up by a conservative think tank and proposed by Nixon. So when it came time to oppose it, they had to fall back on dummy scare tactics. They actually let Sarah Palin speak publically about it! Who in the right mind would do that, now?

We&#039;re mostly our of Iraq and Afghanistan--anti-American? Aside from that, he&#039;s following the George Bush foreign policy playbook. Which isn&#039;t much different from the Bill Clinton playbook, the George HW Bush playbook....

He ain&#039;t the best...but it&#039;s just like George Bush being &quot;stupid&quot; to his opponents. All he has to do is something mildly smart, and he wins. Same exact thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, &#8220;amazingly stupid&#8221; is thinking every choice he makes is wrong and detrimental.</p>
<p>Prioritizing and getting bin Ladin just like he said he would in 2008? How about the amount of al Qaeda leadership decimated under his watch? Giving the order to take out the Somali pirates? Anti-American?</p>
<p>Conservatives hate Obamacare, right?  But they just have no idea why; because what they think it is, it isn&#8217;t. First president to actually reform heath care after 35 years of talking about it. Under it, the uninsured will be insured. The poorest will thus incur costs to us we know, rather than costs to us made up for by inflated imaginary numbers. The ones who can afford care will have access to a marketplace where there will be competition for their dollar. Consumers will be more aware of the real costs they incur and be more informed about health care decisions. Yeah, it&#8217;s a bit half-@ssed, I&#8217;ll agree. But consumer choice, market competition&#8230;anti-American? Huh?</p>
<p>No one was &#8220;racist&#8221; for opposing Obamacare&#8211;just foolish, because they lacked the confidence or ability to make a real argument.  The problem was&#8211;his main opponent pioneered Obamacare. Obamacare was essentially first dreamed up by a conservative think tank and proposed by Nixon. So when it came time to oppose it, they had to fall back on dummy scare tactics. They actually let Sarah Palin speak publically about it! Who in the right mind would do that, now?</p>
<p>We&#8217;re mostly our of Iraq and Afghanistan&#8211;anti-American? Aside from that, he&#8217;s following the George Bush foreign policy playbook. Which isn&#8217;t much different from the Bill Clinton playbook, the George HW Bush playbook&#8230;.</p>
<p>He ain&#8217;t the best&#8230;but it&#8217;s just like George Bush being &#8220;stupid&#8221; to his opponents. All he has to do is something mildly smart, and he wins. Same exact thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cathy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5268256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Sep 2013 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5268256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Considering the gathered intelligence ... sometime in the three days prior to August 21st ... Congress could have held an emergency convening via teleconferencing and ... with Congressional approval Obama authorize what needed to be done to prevent the gassing of almost 1500 Syrians.

Three days!!  Not even a warning!!  What is wrong with this picture. 

++++++++

US government’s assessment of Syria’s use of chemical weapons

Published August 30, 2013

White House Unclassified Intel Report

Preparations:

We have intelligence that leads us to assess that Syrian chemical weapons personnel – including personnel assessed to be associated with the SSRC – were preparing chemical munitions prior to the attack. In the three days prior to the attack, we collected streams of human, signals and geospatial intelligence that reveal regime activities that we assess were associated with preparations for a chemical weapons attack.

Syrian chemical weapons personnel were operating in the Damascus suburb of ‘Adra from Sunday, August 18 until early in the morning on Wednesday, August 21 near an area that the regime uses to mix chemical weapons, including sarin.

On August 21, a Syrian regime element prepared for a chemical weapons attack in the Damascus area, including through the utilization of gas masks.

Our intelligence sources in the Damascus area did not detect any indications in the days prior to the attack that opposition affiliates were planning to use chemical weapons.

Read more:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/30/us-government-assessment-syria-use-chemical-weapons/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the gathered intelligence &#8230; sometime in the three days prior to August 21st &#8230; Congress could have held an emergency convening via teleconferencing and &#8230; with Congressional approval Obama authorize what needed to be done to prevent the gassing of almost 1500 Syrians.</p>
<p>Three days!!  Not even a warning!!  What is wrong with this picture. </p>
<p>++++++++</p>
<p>US government’s assessment of Syria’s use of chemical weapons</p>
<p>Published August 30, 2013</p>
<p>White House Unclassified Intel Report</p>
<p>Preparations:</p>
<p>We have intelligence that leads us to assess that Syrian chemical weapons personnel – including personnel assessed to be associated with the SSRC – were preparing chemical munitions prior to the attack. In the three days prior to the attack, we collected streams of human, signals and geospatial intelligence that reveal regime activities that we assess were associated with preparations for a chemical weapons attack.</p>
<p>Syrian chemical weapons personnel were operating in the Damascus suburb of ‘Adra from Sunday, August 18 until early in the morning on Wednesday, August 21 near an area that the regime uses to mix chemical weapons, including sarin.</p>
<p>On August 21, a Syrian regime element prepared for a chemical weapons attack in the Damascus area, including through the utilization of gas masks.</p>
<p>Our intelligence sources in the Damascus area did not detect any indications in the days prior to the attack that opposition affiliates were planning to use chemical weapons.</p>
<p>Read more:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/30/us-government-assessment-syria-use-chemical-weapons/" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/30/us-government-assessment-syria-use-chemical-weapons/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: okokok</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[okokok]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lol

Fourteen countries that don’t have debt ceilings and are not on fire

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/08/30/fourteen-countries-that-dont-have-debt-ceilings-and-are-not-on-fire/?wpisrc=nl_wnkpm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol</p>
<p>Fourteen countries that don’t have debt ceilings and are not on fire</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/08/30/fourteen-countries-that-dont-have-debt-ceilings-and-are-not-on-fire/?wpisrc=nl_wnkpm" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/08/30/fourteen-countries-that-dont-have-debt-ceilings-and-are-not-on-fire/?wpisrc=nl_wnkpm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziggy zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the second time you&#039;ve claimed that conservatives oppose anything the Jihadi in Chief says or does in a knee-jerk fashion. That is an amazingly stupid claim. We can always count on him to make the wrong decision but it would be nice if he made a good one once in a while. I would settle for a single pro-American decision but we all know that will never happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the second time you&#8217;ve claimed that conservatives oppose anything the Jihadi in Chief says or does in a knee-jerk fashion. That is an amazingly stupid claim. We can always count on him to make the wrong decision but it would be nice if he made a good one once in a while. I would settle for a single pro-American decision but we all know that will never happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziggy zoggy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziggy zoggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WW0, who exactly has criticized the Jihadi In Chief without being accused of racism? What does an FPM thread about vicious Black racism have to do with him? How do you write such obnoxious garbage without vomiting in your mouth?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WW0, who exactly has criticized the Jihadi In Chief without being accused of racism? What does an FPM thread about vicious Black racism have to do with him? How do you write such obnoxious garbage without vomiting in your mouth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb3000</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barb3000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why don&#039;t this government let Syria fight it out and stay out of it.  These people have been fighting  tribal wars for thousands of years without the interference of the US which didn&#039;t even exist at that time.  That&#039;s what this is, a tribal war with no winners.  On top of that the UN wants the US to take in thousands of Syrian refugees that have run to all the surrounding countries that will let them in.  Why is it our tax payers job to support these people? I say help them in these countries and leave them there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t this government let Syria fight it out and stay out of it.  These people have been fighting  tribal wars for thousands of years without the interference of the US which didn&#8217;t even exist at that time.  That&#8217;s what this is, a tribal war with no winners.  On top of that the UN wants the US to take in thousands of Syrian refugees that have run to all the surrounding countries that will let them in.  Why is it our tax payers job to support these people? I say help them in these countries and leave them there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cathy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe an Executive Order is forthcoming.  The Congress ... the Constitution ... are at times huge roadblocks for the Islamic appeaser/Marxist in the White House. 


British lawmakers reject military action in Syria, in setback for Obama administration
Published August 29, 2013

… The outcome raises serious questions for President Obama, who has not yet made a decision on the way forward in Syria but had indicated his administration would need international support for any strike.

After failing to win support for an anti-Assad resolution before the U.N. Security Council, U.S. officials were looking to allies like Britain and France to build a coalition for action in Syria.

The U.K. vote was not technically binding. Even if the measure was approved, Cameron would likely have had to seek another round of approval in a matter of days. But Cameron now risks a political backlash if he proceeds at all; he said Thursday that he understand the British people do not want to see the U.K. involved in Syria.

Polls in the United States have shown similar distaste among Americans for military action in Syria. …

Read more:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/29/syria-strike-push-hits-hurdles/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe an Executive Order is forthcoming.  The Congress &#8230; the Constitution &#8230; are at times huge roadblocks for the Islamic appeaser/Marxist in the White House. </p>
<p>British lawmakers reject military action in Syria, in setback for Obama administration<br />
Published August 29, 2013</p>
<p>… The outcome raises serious questions for President Obama, who has not yet made a decision on the way forward in Syria but had indicated his administration would need international support for any strike.</p>
<p>After failing to win support for an anti-Assad resolution before the U.N. Security Council, U.S. officials were looking to allies like Britain and France to build a coalition for action in Syria.</p>
<p>The U.K. vote was not technically binding. Even if the measure was approved, Cameron would likely have had to seek another round of approval in a matter of days. But Cameron now risks a political backlash if he proceeds at all; he said Thursday that he understand the British people do not want to see the U.K. involved in Syria.</p>
<p>Polls in the United States have shown similar distaste among Americans for military action in Syria. …</p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/29/syria-strike-push-hits-hurdles/" rel="nofollow">http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/29/syria-strike-push-hits-hurdles/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cathy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE!!

Something akin to the British Parliament ... will each US Congress representative be afforded a vote.

UK LEADER DAVID CAMERON LOSES PRELIMINARY VOTE ON SYRIA IN STUNNING DEFEAT FOR GOVERNMENT
Aug. 29 5:33 PM ED

LONDON (AP) — UK leader David Cameron loses preliminary vote on Syria in stunning defeat for government

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/uk-leader-david-cameron-loses-preliminary-vote-syria-stunning-defeat-government


Syria: Government Defeat On Military Action
10:42pm UK, Thursday 29 August 2013

MPs have rejected the Government motion on the principle of military action in Syria by just 13 votes.  The motion, calling for a strong humanitarian response which may have included military action, was defeated by 272 votes to 285 on Thursday night.

http://news.sky.com/story/1134732/syria-government-defeat-on-military-action]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE!!</p>
<p>Something akin to the British Parliament &#8230; will each US Congress representative be afforded a vote.</p>
<p>UK LEADER DAVID CAMERON LOSES PRELIMINARY VOTE ON SYRIA IN STUNNING DEFEAT FOR GOVERNMENT<br />
Aug. 29 5:33 PM ED</p>
<p>LONDON (AP) — UK leader David Cameron loses preliminary vote on Syria in stunning defeat for government</p>
<p><a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/uk-leader-david-cameron-loses-preliminary-vote-syria-stunning-defeat-government" rel="nofollow">http://bigstory.ap.org/article/uk-leader-david-cameron-loses-preliminary-vote-syria-stunning-defeat-government</a></p>
<p>Syria: Government Defeat On Military Action<br />
10:42pm UK, Thursday 29 August 2013</p>
<p>MPs have rejected the Government motion on the principle of military action in Syria by just 13 votes.  The motion, calling for a strong humanitarian response which may have included military action, was defeated by 272 votes to 285 on Thursday night.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.sky.com/story/1134732/syria-government-defeat-on-military-action" rel="nofollow">http://news.sky.com/story/1134732/syria-government-defeat-on-military-action</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WW4</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WW4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not always &quot;racist&quot; to oppose Obama. Plenty have done so without the charge of racism. Obama&#039;s made a lot of dumb calls, they&#039;re pretty easy to argue against without claiming he&#039;s the antichrist. Sure the Left has been idiotic in its use of the label &quot;racism.&quot; But plenty have warranted the label. One only need look at a thread on the killing of that Australian guy to see white supremacy is alive and well, here. HUGE list of racist comments--with a few good regular conservative FPMers calling them out, I should add.



Similarly, it&#039;s true the word &quot;imperialism&quot; gets thrown around, but a good Leftist (no, not me) levies that charge against Obama as well. There&#039;s a lot of &quot;Don&#039;t attack Syria&quot; coming from the Left right now. I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s politically motivated, I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s just war-weariness. But it&#039;s out there, big time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not always &#8220;racist&#8221; to oppose Obama. Plenty have done so without the charge of racism. Obama&#8217;s made a lot of dumb calls, they&#8217;re pretty easy to argue against without claiming he&#8217;s the antichrist. Sure the Left has been idiotic in its use of the label &#8220;racism.&#8221; But plenty have warranted the label. One only need look at a thread on the killing of that Australian guy to see white supremacy is alive and well, here. HUGE list of racist comments&#8211;with a few good regular conservative FPMers calling them out, I should add.</p>
<p>Similarly, it&#8217;s true the word &#8220;imperialism&#8221; gets thrown around, but a good Leftist (no, not me) levies that charge against Obama as well. There&#8217;s a lot of &#8220;Don&#8217;t attack Syria&#8221; coming from the Left right now. I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s politically motivated, I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s just war-weariness. But it&#8217;s out there, big time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cathy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Ted Cruz: Congress must have say on Syria before Obama acts
Thursday, August 29, 201

“When and if President Obama makes a decision on Syria, he must immediately call a special session of Congress and persuade the American people that what he proposes is critical to the defense of our nation,” Mr. Cruz said. “I am confident all members of Congress would willingly return to Washington to work with him on this issue.”

Mr. Cruz said that Mr. Obama’s comments suggest the nation does not face an imminent threat, so only Congress has the authority to declare war.

He said the U.S. should take the lead of the the British House of Commons and the Israeli Knesset, which have called emergency meetings to take up the subject.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/29/sen-ted-cruz-congress-must-have-say-syria-obama-ac/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Ted Cruz: Congress must have say on Syria before Obama acts<br />
Thursday, August 29, 201</p>
<p>“When and if President Obama makes a decision on Syria, he must immediately call a special session of Congress and persuade the American people that what he proposes is critical to the defense of our nation,” Mr. Cruz said. “I am confident all members of Congress would willingly return to Washington to work with him on this issue.”</p>
<p>Mr. Cruz said that Mr. Obama’s comments suggest the nation does not face an imminent threat, so only Congress has the authority to declare war.</p>
<p>He said the U.S. should take the lead of the the British House of Commons and the Israeli Knesset, which have called emergency meetings to take up the subject.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/29/sen-ted-cruz-congress-must-have-say-syria-obama-ac/" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/aug/29/sen-ted-cruz-congress-must-have-say-syria-obama-ac/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WW4</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WW4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think it is as &quot;obvious&quot; as you say--which means the &quot;treason&quot; charge is still as fatuous as ever, a word to just get tossed around.


That said, you&#039;re absolutely right: some gains were made, and Mr. Bush deserves credit for them, just as Mr. Obama deserves credit for the things he&#039;s accomplished, and both deserve blame for the things they didn&#039;t do, or botched.


I know your posts, and you generally have a solid point of view that warrants discussion. But your charge here of politics is no different then mine: What&#039;s Obama going to do? Bomb? Not Bomb? Wait for Congress? Not wait for Congress? Bomb small? Bomb big? Who cares--we&#039;ll be against whatever it is! Whose side are you on, Assad or the Muslim Brotherhood? Who cares--whichever side Obama&#039;s (supposedly) not on!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it is as &#8220;obvious&#8221; as you say&#8211;which means the &#8220;treason&#8221; charge is still as fatuous as ever, a word to just get tossed around.</p>
<p>That said, you&#8217;re absolutely right: some gains were made, and Mr. Bush deserves credit for them, just as Mr. Obama deserves credit for the things he&#8217;s accomplished, and both deserve blame for the things they didn&#8217;t do, or botched.</p>
<p>I know your posts, and you generally have a solid point of view that warrants discussion. But your charge here of politics is no different then mine: What&#8217;s Obama going to do? Bomb? Not Bomb? Wait for Congress? Not wait for Congress? Bomb small? Bomb big? Who cares&#8211;we&#8217;ll be against whatever it is! Whose side are you on, Assad or the Muslim Brotherhood? Who cares&#8211;whichever side Obama&#8217;s (supposedly) not on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WW4</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WW4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not a lot of conservatives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a lot of conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DonaldYoungsRevenge</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DonaldYoungsRevenge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joseph Klein, you need to join hands with Aaron Klein and all the members of Sheriff Joe Arpaio&#039;s investigative team.  Sheriff Joe&#039;s lead investigator Mike Zullo has packaged the evidence and made it courtroom ready.  All you have to do is look at. it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph Klein, you need to join hands with Aaron Klein and all the members of Sheriff Joe Arpaio&#8217;s investigative team.  Sheriff Joe&#8217;s lead investigator Mike Zullo has packaged the evidence and made it courtroom ready.  All you have to do is look at. it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cathy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267275</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Then there is the double standard of John Kerry.

We Still Have a Choice on Iraq

Senator John Kerry, D-Mass.
New York Times
September 6, 2002

&quot; ....For the sake of our country, the legitimacy of our cause and our ultimate success in Iraq, the administration must seek advice and approval from Congress, laying out the evidence and making the case. Then, in concert with our allies, it must seek full enforcement of the existing cease-fire agreement from the United Nations Security Council. We should at the same time offer a clear ultimatum to Iraq before the world: Accept rigorous inspections without negotiation or compromise. ....&quot;

http://www.cfr.org/world/we-still-have-choice-iraq/p5596]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then there is the double standard of John Kerry.</p>
<p>We Still Have a Choice on Iraq</p>
<p>Senator John Kerry, D-Mass.<br />
New York Times<br />
September 6, 2002</p>
<p>&#8221; &#8230;.For the sake of our country, the legitimacy of our cause and our ultimate success in Iraq, the administration must seek advice and approval from Congress, laying out the evidence and making the case. Then, in concert with our allies, it must seek full enforcement of the existing cease-fire agreement from the United Nations Security Council. We should at the same time offer a clear ultimatum to Iraq before the world: Accept rigorous inspections without negotiation or compromise. &#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cfr.org/world/we-still-have-choice-iraq/p5596" rel="nofollow">http://www.cfr.org/world/we-still-have-choice-iraq/p5596</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cathy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267273</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION&#039;S DOUBLE STANDARD

Video: Biden Threatening to Impeach President (Bush) If He Launches an Attack Without Congressional Authority
27 Aug 2013


Biden: I was chairman of the judiciary committee for 17 years or its ranking member. I teach separation of powers and constitutional law. This is something I know. So I got together and brought a group of constitutional scholars together to write a piece that I&#039;m going to deliver to the whole United State Senate pointing out the President (Bush) has no constitutional authority...to take this nation to war against a county of 70 million people unless we&#039;re attacked or unless there is proof we are about to be attacked. And if he does, if he does, I would move to impeach him. The House obviously has to do that but I would lead an effort to impeach him.&quot; 

http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013/08/27/Video-Biden-Will-Impeach-Bush-if-He-Attacks-Iran-Without-Congressional-Authority]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION&#8217;S DOUBLE STANDARD</p>
<p>Video: Biden Threatening to Impeach President (Bush) If He Launches an Attack Without Congressional Authority<br />
27 Aug 2013</p>
<p>Biden: I was chairman of the judiciary committee for 17 years or its ranking member. I teach separation of powers and constitutional law. This is something I know. So I got together and brought a group of constitutional scholars together to write a piece that I&#8217;m going to deliver to the whole United State Senate pointing out the President (Bush) has no constitutional authority&#8230;to take this nation to war against a county of 70 million people unless we&#8217;re attacked or unless there is proof we are about to be attacked. And if he does, if he does, I would move to impeach him. The House obviously has to do that but I would lead an effort to impeach him.&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013/08/27/Video-Biden-Will-Impeach-Bush-if-He-Attacks-Iran-Without-Congressional-Authority" rel="nofollow">http://www.breitbart.com/InstaBlog/2013/08/27/Video-Biden-Will-Impeach-Bush-if-He-Attacks-Iran-Without-Congressional-Authority</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gee</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t forget Odumba&#039;s other wars without Congressional approval - Pakistan, Yemen and Libya.


Odumba has launched more wars than any other President ever]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget Odumba&#8217;s other wars without Congressional approval &#8211; Pakistan, Yemen and Libya.</p>
<p>Odumba has launched more wars than any other President ever</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gee</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nope there were a lot of people against going into Iraq and even more against spending $1.5 trillion to rebuild it.


This bloodthirsty tyrant will not be satisfied without a 4th illegal war under his belt.


He is a racist, coward that is attempting to destroy the United States]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope there were a lot of people against going into Iraq and even more against spending $1.5 trillion to rebuild it.</p>
<p>This bloodthirsty tyrant will not be satisfied without a 4th illegal war under his belt.</p>
<p>He is a racist, coward that is attempting to destroy the United States</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CowboyUp</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CowboyUp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They haven&#039;t lost their minds to any greater extent, it&#039;s purely political, and always has been.   They default to whatever option is the worst for the USA and our allies, and best for our worst enemies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They haven&#8217;t lost their minds to any greater extent, it&#8217;s purely political, and always has been.   They default to whatever option is the worst for the USA and our allies, and best for our worst enemies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CowboyUp</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CowboyUp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s pretty obvious the opposition on the left after the voted for enforcing the GWCFA, was purely political. That IS treason.  Iraq made sense strategically, bombing Syria on behalf of the muslim brotherhood and al qaeda doesn&#039;t.  There&#039;s no lipsticking that pig.
And I never changed my mind about Iraq.   Defanging quaddaffy, discovering the Khan nuclear proliferation network, and exposing the UN and Euro corruption in the oil for palaces scam were serious gains, not to mention removing saddam and his psychotic sons and freeing up the US forces he tied down trying to contain him.  The time to bomb boy assad was when he was supporting al Qaeda in Iraq, along with Iran.    I fault Bush for his failure to attack the insurgent&#039;s rat lines at their source and make Syria and Iran&#039;s interference more costly than they were willing to pay.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty obvious the opposition on the left after the voted for enforcing the GWCFA, was purely political. That IS treason.  Iraq made sense strategically, bombing Syria on behalf of the muslim brotherhood and al qaeda doesn&#8217;t.  There&#8217;s no lipsticking that pig.<br />
And I never changed my mind about Iraq.   Defanging quaddaffy, discovering the Khan nuclear proliferation network, and exposing the UN and Euro corruption in the oil for palaces scam were serious gains, not to mention removing saddam and his psychotic sons and freeing up the US forces he tied down trying to contain him.  The time to bomb boy assad was when he was supporting al Qaeda in Iraq, along with Iran.    I fault Bush for his failure to attack the insurgent&#8217;s rat lines at their source and make Syria and Iran&#8217;s interference more costly than they were willing to pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nomoretraitors</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-klein/unilateralism-obama-style/comment-page-1/#comment-5267218</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nomoretraitors]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=202251#comment-5267218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Remember: if you thought invading Iraq was a bad idea, you got called a &quot;traitor&quot; routinely. That is, until Obama was elected&quot;
Remember: dissent was &quot;patriotic,&quot; that is, until Obama was elected. Now it has become &quot;racist&quot;
Some other interesting things to &quot;remember:&quot;
The left routinely refers to Republicans as &quot;war mongers&quot; and America as &quot;imperalist&quot; for &quot;meddling&quot; in other countries&#039; affairs (even though both Korea and Vietnam were initiated by Democratic presidents), yet now support military action (therefore &quot;meddling) in Syria. Why? Because Obama is now commander in chief (and I use that term very loosely)
Jumpin Joe Biden is on tape calling for Bush&#039;s impeachment should he take unilateral action against Iran, yet now support Obama taking unilateral action in Syria.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Remember: if you thought invading Iraq was a bad idea, you got called a &#8220;traitor&#8221; routinely. That is, until Obama was elected&#8221;<br />
Remember: dissent was &#8220;patriotic,&#8221; that is, until Obama was elected. Now it has become &#8220;racist&#8221;<br />
Some other interesting things to &#8220;remember:&#8221;<br />
The left routinely refers to Republicans as &#8220;war mongers&#8221; and America as &#8220;imperalist&#8221; for &#8220;meddling&#8221; in other countries&#8217; affairs (even though both Korea and Vietnam were initiated by Democratic presidents), yet now support military action (therefore &#8220;meddling) in Syria. Why? Because Obama is now commander in chief (and I use that term very loosely)<br />
Jumpin Joe Biden is on tape calling for Bush&#8217;s impeachment should he take unilateral action against Iran, yet now support Obama taking unilateral action in Syria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 717/743 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 00:25:26 by W3 Total Cache -->