<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Islamism&#8217;s Tactical Advantage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-puder/islamisms-tactical-advantage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-puder/islamisms-tactical-advantage/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=islamisms-tactical-advantage</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 08:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: PhillipGaley</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-puder/islamisms-tactical-advantage/comment-page-1/#comment-5239485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PhillipGaley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194985#comment-5239485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would say, rather, &quot;What a mixed-up comment, on a fragmentary and off-point article, and not that, it&#039;s totally wrong, but: In reality, both are totalitarian systems which—as any and all other criminal organizations—deny individuality, suppress free will, reject commonly perceived morality and insist right and wrong to be determined on an ad hoc basis, by the head honchos, which—for Moslems—are their imams, their so-called lawyers, as their sense of need shall dictate, . . . and, be there any of whole mind who would say that, the Moslem peoples are not ruled by their lawyers?

Instead of a period, &quot;. . . . slammed the Obama administration. &#039;The notion that there . . . .&quot;, should rather, have a colon, thusly: &quot;. . . . slammed the Obama administration:  &#039;The notion that there . . . .&quot;.

if I and my associates bow 7 times to the east, and in the next motion, use flowing robes and head coverings to obscure view, and prosecute a robbery, are we robbers, or are we religionists?  Consistent with political promulgation in pablum populi, does saying something is so, make that thing an operative fact in our plane of life?  And so, America and the West cannot defeat Islamism and its terrorist operatives so long as the people fail in mental power to apply the old: &quot;If it looks like a duck, if it walks like a duck, and sounds like a duck, probably, it&#039;s a duck.&quot;, . . .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say, rather, &#8220;What a mixed-up comment, on a fragmentary and off-point article, and not that, it&#8217;s totally wrong, but: In reality, both are totalitarian systems which—as any and all other criminal organizations—deny individuality, suppress free will, reject commonly perceived morality and insist right and wrong to be determined on an ad hoc basis, by the head honchos, which—for Moslems—are their imams, their so-called lawyers, as their sense of need shall dictate, . . . and, be there any of whole mind who would say that, the Moslem peoples are not ruled by their lawyers?</p>
<p>Instead of a period, &#8220;. . . . slammed the Obama administration. &#8216;The notion that there . . . .&#8221;, should rather, have a colon, thusly: &#8220;. . . . slammed the Obama administration:  &#8216;The notion that there . . . .&#8221;.</p>
<p>if I and my associates bow 7 times to the east, and in the next motion, use flowing robes and head coverings to obscure view, and prosecute a robbery, are we robbers, or are we religionists?  Consistent with political promulgation in pablum populi, does saying something is so, make that thing an operative fact in our plane of life?  And so, America and the West cannot defeat Islamism and its terrorist operatives so long as the people fail in mental power to apply the old: &#8220;If it looks like a duck, if it walks like a duck, and sounds like a duck, probably, it&#8217;s a duck.&#8221;, . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infovoyeur</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-puder/islamisms-tactical-advantage/comment-page-1/#comment-5239141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Infovoyeur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194985#comment-5239141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I diagnose our malady as Semantic Confusion--treatable as follows.  To begin seeing complexity in a situation seemingly simple and unitary. (As in, What is Islam? Who are Muslims?)  As follows, using analogies of &quot;Siamese twins&quot; and &quot;sheep and wolves.&quot;
(1) As for Islam itself as a &quot;religion,&quot; here we must &quot;Conjoin (see correctly as one), Two Items Too Often Wrongly Seen as Distinct, Separate.&quot;  That is, Islam is a religion but is spliced, nay welded, nay fused, to its parent, nay twin, a larger system of totalitarian uncivil ideology of Sharia in a total cultural political economic etc. entity.  Even as SIAMESE TWINS are connected--and in this case, inseparable via operation!  That is, you cannot save out the Religion cleanly, without contamination from the whole system. THEREFORE, Islam as a &quot;religion&quot; merits no civil-rights protection in our system as a &quot;religion;,&quot; it is too much more than that, it trails in unacceptable elements indivisibly from itself!  How unusual but actually accurate a view...
(2) As for MUSLIMS themselves, here we must Separate (distinguish) Two Items Wrongly Seen as One.&quot;  Some people see all Muslims as terrorists, others protest seeing any Muslims as terrorists (=the deadly &quot;steamroller egalitarianism&quot; of P.C.)  In fact Muslims are of two types.  The Sheep (=meaning flock of worshipers moderates MINOS or M. in Name Only, and the like--both inoffensive and ineffective). But also the WOLVES in Sheeps&#039; Clothing (=dedicated jihadists who seek the Global Caliphate, but of course subersive-invisible).  THEREFORE we must rigorously seek out to uncover the latter, &quot;discriminate&quot; not in bad sense of wrongly, but in technical sense of perceive and act upon differences to divide the meek from the malicious. How seemingly-brutal but actually responsible a view...
Now these two habits of thought above, although &quot;unnatural&quot; or difficult, let alone currently paralyzed by P.C., nevertheless seem vital to our survival.  And they may well provide an efficient tool, route, policy, etc.  Of course, that would mean starting right now--or never...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I diagnose our malady as Semantic Confusion&#8211;treatable as follows.  To begin seeing complexity in a situation seemingly simple and unitary. (As in, What is Islam? Who are Muslims?)  As follows, using analogies of &#8220;Siamese twins&#8221; and &#8220;sheep and wolves.&#8221;<br />
(1) As for Islam itself as a &#8220;religion,&#8221; here we must &#8220;Conjoin (see correctly as one), Two Items Too Often Wrongly Seen as Distinct, Separate.&#8221;  That is, Islam is a religion but is spliced, nay welded, nay fused, to its parent, nay twin, a larger system of totalitarian uncivil ideology of Sharia in a total cultural political economic etc. entity.  Even as SIAMESE TWINS are connected&#8211;and in this case, inseparable via operation!  That is, you cannot save out the Religion cleanly, without contamination from the whole system. THEREFORE, Islam as a &#8220;religion&#8221; merits no civil-rights protection in our system as a &#8220;religion;,&#8221; it is too much more than that, it trails in unacceptable elements indivisibly from itself!  How unusual but actually accurate a view&#8230;<br />
(2) As for MUSLIMS themselves, here we must Separate (distinguish) Two Items Wrongly Seen as One.&#8221;  Some people see all Muslims as terrorists, others protest seeing any Muslims as terrorists (=the deadly &#8220;steamroller egalitarianism&#8221; of P.C.)  In fact Muslims are of two types.  The Sheep (=meaning flock of worshipers moderates MINOS or M. in Name Only, and the like&#8211;both inoffensive and ineffective). But also the WOLVES in Sheeps&#8217; Clothing (=dedicated jihadists who seek the Global Caliphate, but of course subersive-invisible).  THEREFORE we must rigorously seek out to uncover the latter, &#8220;discriminate&#8221; not in bad sense of wrongly, but in technical sense of perceive and act upon differences to divide the meek from the malicious. How seemingly-brutal but actually responsible a view&#8230;<br />
Now these two habits of thought above, although &#8220;unnatural&#8221; or difficult, let alone currently paralyzed by P.C., nevertheless seem vital to our survival.  And they may well provide an efficient tool, route, policy, etc.  Of course, that would mean starting right now&#8211;or never&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alpha_1</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-puder/islamisms-tactical-advantage/comment-page-1/#comment-5239059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alpha_1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194985#comment-5239059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amen to that.  Very good article.  I am only a layman when it comes to these things but I see Islam as a religion of violent conquest.  That violent conquest will only stop when the whole world bows to the religion of Islam.  We need to wake up and wake up in a hurry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to that.  Very good article.  I am only a layman when it comes to these things but I see Islam as a religion of violent conquest.  That violent conquest will only stop when the whole world bows to the religion of Islam.  We need to wake up and wake up in a hurry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ammanius</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-puder/islamisms-tactical-advantage/comment-page-1/#comment-5239019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ammanius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194985#comment-5239019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It is a political perversion of Islam, albeit it is rooted in Islamic traditions and scriptures.&quot;
This is becoming a tiresome debate.  The assertion reflected in the above statement from the author of this piece contradicts his otherwise sensible argument.  Of course the terrorism he outlines is rooted in Islamic tradition because Islam itself is based on terrorism.  Ironically it is the political correctness he correctly castigates that prevents him from seeing this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is a political perversion of Islam, albeit it is rooted in Islamic traditions and scriptures.&#8221;<br />
This is becoming a tiresome debate.  The assertion reflected in the above statement from the author of this piece contradicts his otherwise sensible argument.  Of course the terrorism he outlines is rooted in Islamic tradition because Islam itself is based on terrorism.  Ironically it is the political correctness he correctly castigates that prevents him from seeing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newsel</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/joseph-puder/islamisms-tactical-advantage/comment-page-1/#comment-5238991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[newsel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=194985#comment-5238991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No PC or pulling punches here:

Putin stated “I am sure you agree that we surely should not support people who not only kill their enemies but cut open their bodies and eat their innards before the public and the cameras.” 

http://eng.news.kremlin.ru/news/5597]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No PC or pulling punches here:</p>
<p>Putin stated “I am sure you agree that we surely should not support people who not only kill their enemies but cut open their bodies and eat their innards before the public and the cameras.” </p>
<p><a href="http://eng.news.kremlin.ru/news/5597" rel="nofollow">http://eng.news.kremlin.ru/news/5597</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 389/394 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 03:47:27 by W3 Total Cache -->