Soros-Funded Religious Left Group Targets Gitmo

torture-banner-5x7The chief torturer of Sudan’s Islamist regime is soon to visit the U.S., igniting not a peep of concern from left-leaning church officials ostensibly very concerned about “torture.”  Instead, a long list of prominent church honchos is instead demanding President Obama close Guantanamo Bay detention center because of its reputed history of “torture.”  Their letter was organized by the National Religious Campaign Against Torture, which has received over $1 million from George Soros.

“Guantanamo Bay is a place where our government tortured prisoners, and it continues to be a place where many are detained indefinitely without trial,” the church activists wrote Obama.  “We believe that our government has a moral obligation to close the prison at Guantanamo. We hope that you share this belief and that you will act expeditiously to close Guantanamo.”

The letter was signed by old-line Protestant officials with groups like the National Council of Churches and United Methodist Board of Church and Society, with old leftist Catholic lobbies like Pax Christi and Sister Simone Campbell’s “Nuns on the Bus” NETWORK, plus the Islamic Society of North America of course.

The prelates and activists are “deeply concerned” about Guantanamo’s persistence and the “indefinite detention without trial of many of the people imprisoned there” at the “nation’s most visible and painful symbol of torture and indefinite detention,” exemplifying America’s “deep moral wound.”

Church officials are particularly troubled by 86 “cleared detainees” who remain there, without mentioning that a chief problem is finding countries willing to accept them.  They also don’t mention the released inmates who have returned to murder and terror.  And they’re troubled by the “desperation and hopelessness felt by many of the detainees” that has “recently sparked a hunger strike,” “highlighting the growing human tragedy of the detention center.”

The church activists complain about a proposed nearly $200 million upgrade for Guantanamo, which does sound pricey.  But their complaint showcases how the Religious Left is only concerned about costs when related to national security, for which nearly any price is too much.  They want to start “transferring prisoners” but don’t say where or how.  Presumably they want them, if not released, moved to the U.S. and into the domestic criminal justice system.

For the Religious Left, Guantanamo is important as an unwanted symbol of the War on Terror, which for them does not or should not exist.  For them, the U.S. largely has no enemies who were not provoked or cannot be ameliorated through good will and reparations.  For them, detainees are more victims than dangerous terrorists or terror sympathizers.

This denunciation of Guantanamo comes courtesy of George Soros’ philanthropy.  The National Religious Campaign Against Torture (NRCAT) (by the U.S.) received over $1 million from 2007 to 2011, the last available reporting year.  Soros’ Open Society Foundations in 2010 hosted a NRCAT conversation on 9-11’s anniversary to spotlight the giving outreach of the philanthropy’s National Security and Human Rights Campaign.  Participants were NRCAT chief and Presbyterian minister/activist Richard Kilmer, former Islamic Society of North America president Ingrid Mattson, Rabbi Rachel Kahn-Troster of Rabbis for Human Rights – North America, and former National Association of Evangelicals chief lobbyist Richard Cizik, now head of New Evangelical Partnership for the Common Good.  Cizik boasted of NRCAT’s “Shoulder to Shoulder” campaign against “anti-Muslim bigotry,” whose purpose was evidenced, he said, by Congressman Peter King’s 2011 Homeland Security Committee hearings on what Cizik dismissed as alleged “radicalization of the American Muslim community,” but which he said actually exemplified the “marginalization and typecasting of a religious community.”

NRCAT itself was formed in 2006, in response to the Abu Ghraib photos, by Princeton University theologian George Hunsinger “to examine how religious communities could respond to the U.S. military’s use of torture against 9/11 detainees.”  NRCAT fights “torture” by the U.S., or by implication any government that may help the U.S., but not by anybody else.  NRCAT also combats “anti-Muslim bigotry,” which is laudable, except that “bigotry” often includes any substantive concern about radical Islam.

June will be NRCAT’s annual “Anti-Torture Month” when local religious congregations are enlisted to oppose the U.S. War on Terror, of which “torture” is presumed to be central, and which includes a film called Ending U.S.-Sponsored Torture Forever.  There are even anti- torture prayer and sermons for a complete worship experience devoted to opposing “torture” by the U.S., but not really by anybody else, especially America’s adversaries.

So don’t expect any NRCAT or wider Religious Left concerns about the impending U.S. visit of former Sudanese chief torturer Nafie Ali Nafie, once head of the genocidal Islamist regime’s notorious intelligence service and still a top presidential advisor infamous for personally having tortured opposition leaders, for which he expresses no regret when asked.   Any protests against him might stoke anti-Muslim bigotry (although most of that regime’s victims are themselves Muslim) and distract attention from the far more vital mission of endlessly spotlighting U.S. detention abuses, real and alleged, of mostly 10 years ago.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • Omar

    We need to counter the left-wing religious groups with conservative atheist activists and organizations. Also, why doesn't the religious left protest against human rights violations in Sudan, a country which is ruled by a racist, sexist, Islamist dictatorship that behaves worse than South Africa's former apartheid regime. The religious left, much like the left in general, supports the Islamist dictatorship in Sudan because The Islamists there and in other countries in the Middle East are anti-democracy and anti-Western. The left has no morals at all.

  • guest

    Pacifists are fascists, see George Orwell's brilliant essay. The left fundamentally does not understand war. They think all war is bad, but in reality for most wars there is no choice involved. It's fight and win and survive or nonexistence. From pacifism they travel down a blind alley of sorts into outright denial of the very existence of such a thing as an enemy. So they don't understand the idea of an enemy. They don't understand that there is no choice involved in one's enemies. No one chooses their enemies. The enemy makes his own choices. Or you could just say that the leftists are idiots. And btw, the reason they protest gitmo and not Sudan is because it's safe to protest gitmo. They'd likely be killed in Sudan. But to realize this would take self reflection. There's no self reflection and reconciling to any rational standard with the left. They're group think collectivists. And their ethics, so called, are determined through a popularity contest of sorts. It's really kind of random. It's only consistency is that it's usually against America or the west or their own families.