Obama’s Syria Spin

barack-obama-george-stephanopoulosEven with the assistance of his media minions, President Obama is failing to articulate any kind of a rational defense of the administration’s nonsensical, on-again, off-again policy toward Syria.

Yet somehow despite Obama’s bumbling on the domestic and world stages, Russia and the United States agreed Saturday to take custody of Syria’s stockpile of chemical weapons by the middle of next year. Syria is required to hand over an inventory of the illicit weapons within a week.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said the pact will be backed up by a UN Security Council resolution. Noncompliance could lead to sanctions or other actions, he said. Kerry said the inspections could begin by November and that destruction of the weapons could get underway in 2014. Assad sent a letter Thursday to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon promising that he will sign the international treaty that bans chemical weapons today.

Then the games will begin. The parties are likely to negotiate the same kind of weapons inspections regime that the world saw in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and Kim Jong-il’s North Korea. Even if inspectors are allowed to locate and examine the weapons, it is far from clear how they will be able to seize and destroy them while Syria’s increasingly brutal two-and-a-half year-old civil war continues to rage.

Obama is now claiming that this supposed diplomatic victory is related to his effort to obtain authorization from Congress to use force against the Syrian regime. In fact Obama backed away from the congressional push when it became obvious that Congress would have turned him down.

This means that unless Obama was willing to cause a constitutional crisis by acting against Syria without congressional approval, there was no credible threat to use force.

But happily things still turned out according to his secret master plan, Obama told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos.

It may not have appeared “smooth and disciplined and linear,” but it’s working, he offered.

“I’m less concerned about style points. I’m much more concerned with getting the policy right,” said Obama who has been using the Syrian regime’s alleged use of chemical weapons as a pretext for helping al-Qaeda and the other Islamofascist terrorists now fighting Bashar al-Assad’s forces.

Obama then acknowledged an assist provided by Russian President Vladimir Putin. Russia’s diplomatic plan has put the U.S. “definitely in a better position,” Obama said.

“My entire goal throughout this exercise is to make sure what happened on Aug. 21 does not happen again,” Obama said, referring to a large-scale chemical weapons attack outside Damascus that he claimed killed more than 1,400 civilians.

“We have the possibility of making sure it doesn’t happen again,” he said.

Leftist lapdogs who earn their living whitewashing Obama’s record continue to push the president’s proposed alliance with al-Qaeda in Syria without acknowledging that Obama wants to work with the same people who flew airplanes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon just 12 years ago.

Obama-worshippers deal in different ways with the unpleasantness of the cognitive dissonance they experience from defending the president.

For example, at Daily Kos, senior policy editor Jed Lewison mocked Syrian President Assad for his self-serving but factually accurate observation about the enemy he’s fighting in Syria.

During Charlie Rose’s recent English-language interview with Assad on CBS, the dictator said the U.S. should not attack the Syrian government because doing so “is going to support al-Qaeda and the same people that kill[ed] Americans in the 11[th] of September.”

Although it is an objective fact that Obama is supporting al-Qaeda, which orchestrated the 9/11 attacks and is a major player in the coalition fighting Assad, Lewison criticizes Assad by name instead of Obama:

Personally, I find Assad’s scaremongering against attacking about as convincing as I find the scaremongering in favor of attacking, but I guess at least there’s one thing that that the scaremongers can all agree on: That if you’re not with them, then you’re with Al Qaeda.

Lewison, a former mouthpiece for Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), is also editor of Daily Kos TV.

A Media Matters blogger who has strategized with Obama at the White House also doesn’t seem to grasp that the president wants to arm al-Qaeda.

After Ayman al-Zawahiri called last week for Muslims to attack inside the U.S., Obama supplicant Oliver Willis denounced the al-Qaeda leader on Twitter. “[T]his ass can’t die quick enough,” wrote Willis without a hint of irony.

Fresh from humiliating Obama, Putin plans to visit Tehran to help craft a strategy for Iran’s nuclear program, which is believed to be a front for developing nuclear weapons.

Obama is eager to bow before the new leader of the Islamofascist regime in Tehran, Iranian president Hassan Rouhani, and has acknowledged reaching out to him. A meeting between the two may take place at the United Nations as soon as this week.

Obama said he is cautiously optimistic that Putin will be a reliable partner in the process in Syria, while at the same time slighting him. “I don’t think that Mr. Putin has the same values that we do,” Obama said, replying to the Russian president’s controversial New York Times op-ed that rejected “American exceptionalism.”

Funny. It was just two years ago that Obama pronounced the idea of American exceptionalism meaningless by saying that every country believes it is exceptional.

“I believe in American exceptionalism, just as I suspect that the Brits believe in British exceptionalism and the Greeks believe in Greek exceptionalism,” Obama said at the time.

In this, Obama and Putin are on the same page.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • Gamal

    Part of the negotiations that will take place regarding Syria’s chemical weapons will be the demand that Israel give up its nuclear weapons.

    • http://subversioninc.com Matthew Vadum

      You’re probably right. The question is who will push harder: Putin or Obama?

      • m4253y

        are you intentionally being either facetious or rhetorical, or both?

        the answer to that is pretty obvious.

        • http://subversioninc.com Matthew Vadum


          • m4253y

            without any doubt. i did go online and re-read both his cairo (2009) and UN (sept 2012) speeches and i am simply awe struck that no-one is pointing out both the muslim in chief’s glaring stupidity on foreign policy matters and his perverse and pro MB ideology.

          • http://subversioninc.com Matthew Vadum
      • oandroplex700

        Putin is head and shoulders above the likes of obama, ob is way over his head, and he knows it, even his arrogance, cant help him here

    • Gee

      What weapons? Israel has never stated that it has them – nor our we required to do anything at all.

      Odumba and Putin can put that demand where the sun doesn’t shine

      • defcon 4

        It would be better if Israel had them — mounted on thousands of ICBM’s, because that is all the delusional Jew haters of the world respect.

    • truebearing

      Israel would be better off nuking itself if it decided to give up their nukes. Given the insanity of the Muslims, and Twelvers in particular, an Israel with no nuclear deterrent is a country consigned to hell.
      As for the US, Obama is working feverishly to consign us to groveling dhimmitude to any or every country on earth. Israel and the US are Obama’s “axis of evil.”

  • CaoMoo

    The man’s arrogance and narcisism knows no bounds does it?

    • http://americandictators.blogspot.com/ WarriorClass III

      Syria is going to seriously spin out of control:


      • lori

        My Uncle Lincoln got a stunning white Land Rover Range Rover Sport by working part-time from a macbook… site link


    • oandroplex700

      absolutley not.ask obuma, he”ll tell you he”s teriffic!!

  • m4253y

    “I’m less concerned about style points. I’m much more concerned with getting the policy right,” said Obama

    Matthew, you needn’t write such a lengthy article on the muslim in chief’s Syria spin, all you had to do was paste his UN speech a year ago in the face of Benghazi…remember, “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

    the family of those dead in Benghazi sadly learned this the hard way.

  • Mladen_Andrijasevic

    It is incredible that Obama still thinks his words have any weight, after all the flip-flopping! One can just go back and compare what Churchill had been saying in the 1940s and the hope and inspiration the Brits and in fact the whole word got from his speeches. Obama’s words sound hollow and insincere and we in Israel can now only turn to our own leadership to save us and everyone else from the Iranian nuclear threat.

    Why Israelis See Shi’ite Axis as a Greater Threat Than Syrian Jihad

  • Lanna

    Mr. O lives in his own world, the American people, as well, as other nations, and all parties are looking at him in a different light, especially after trying to bomb Syria’s weapons stash and Putin came out the Victor, he has really made the office of the Presidency look small, what a big Mistake he has been in every way!

  • Vladimir

    The embarassing should get the…..out off the Mediterranian with his Bathtubbs.

  • oandroplex700

    I love the way obam, tries to sound Intelligent, and knowledgeable, when he gives his teleprompter read speeches, the morons that still believe in his failed policies and Ideas, surely must be getting sick and tired of this fraud…by now!!….

  • USARetired

    The ‘Idiot in Chief’ failed agai9n by not insisting Assad’s biological weapons be included, as they are more hazardous then the chemical weapons. Because it has been brought up now, he acts like mentioning them is his idea. This is amateur hour at it’s best, or is he preserving them for his Muslim Brotherhood?